Anti-reversion coagents for rubber vulcanization

This invention relates to a rubber composition having improved physical properties. More particularly, it relates to a sulfur-vulcanized rubber composition which is vulcanized in the presence of particular anti-reversion coagents. The invention also relates to a sulfur-vulcanization process which is carried out in the presence of particular anti-reversion coagents and the use of particular anti-reversion coagents in the sulfur-vulcanization of rubber. Finally, the invention also relates to rubber products comprising rubber vulcanized with sulfur in the presence of particular anti-reversion coagents.
In the tire and belt industries, among others, better mechanical and heat resistance properties are being demanded. It has long been known that the mechanical properties of rubber can be improved by using a large amount of sulfur as a cross-linking agent to increase the cross-link density in vulcanized rubbers. However, the use of large amounts of sulfur suffers from the disadvantage that it produces reversion and leads to a marked decrease in heat resistance and resistance to flex cracking, among other properties, in the final product. The fact that reversion is a continuing problem can be seen from, "Rubber Microstructure and Reversion," Nordsiek, Dr. K. H., Rubber World, 197 (3), pp. 30-38, 1987, and, "Physikalische und Chemische Aspekte der Reversion," Kautschuk+Gummi-Kunstoffe, 34, No. 9, 1981.
In order to eliminate the foregoing disadvantage, it has been proposed to add coagents to sulfur-vulcanization systems. One known type of coagent are the maleimides. Such vulcanization systems are disclosed in, "Vulcanization With Maleimides," Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 8, pp. 2281-2298 (1964).
U.S. Pat. No. 3,297,713 suggests the use of dithiobis (N-phenylmaleimides) as vulcanizing agents for rubber. However, this system does not employ .sulfur as a vulcanization agent and thus suffers from several disadvantages which result from the absence of sulfur cross-links in the rubber product.
Japanese patent publication J6 1014-238 discloses sulfur-vulcanization systems wherein maleimides are used as coagents and which also contain either dibenzothiazyl disulfide or tetramethylthiuram disulfide. However, this solution is of limited application since only vulcanization accelerators having relatively short scorch times can be used with the bis-maleimides.
European patent application 0 191 931 suggests that the use of a bismaleimide compound in combination with a sulfenamide and a dithiophosphoric acid leads to further improvements in the mechanical and anti-reversion properties of sulfur-vulcanized rubbers. The patent specification claims that these rubbers exhibit improved resistance to reversion, resistance to heat ageing and resistance to flex cracking. However, this system is limited to vulcanization carried out in the presence of a sulfenamide accelerator in combination with a dithiophosphoric acid accelerator and is thus of limited utility in actual practice.
In the article, "Change in the Structure and Properties of Vulcanizates Based on Natural Rubber Under Prolonged Vulcanization in the Presence of Vulcanizing Systems Containing Sulfur and Bismaleimides," Chavchich, T. A., et al., Kauchuk i Rezina, vol. 4, pp. 20-3, 1981, there is disclosed that vulcanization of natural rubber tread stocks with sulfur in the presence of m-phenylenebismaleimide at 143.degree. C. over a 600-minute period gave vulcanizates with enhanced physiomechanical properties and resistance to reversion.
Other articles relating to the sulfur-vulcanization of rubbers using bismaleimides as coagents include, "Vulcanization of cis-1,4-isoprene rubber by derivatives of maleimide under the action of high temperatures and radiation," Kauchuk i Rezina, vol. 3, pp. 10-12, 1974; "High-temperature Vulcanization of Unsaturated Rubbers by Thio Derivatives of Maleimide," Kauchuk i Rezina, vol. 3, pp. 16-19, 1975; and, "Influence of the Type and Concentration of Crosslinking Agent on the Effectiveness of a Combined System of Bismaleimide and Sulfur," Kauchuk i Rezina, No. 10, pp. 15-19, 1985.
Even more recently, Japanese patent applications J6 3286-445 and J6 3312-333 disclosed the vulcanization of rubber with sulfur and an aliphatic bis-maleimide or N,N'-toluene bis-maleimide. These particular bis-maleimides are said to improve the heat resistance and adhesion properties of the rubbers.
Further, European patent applications 345 825 and 410 152 also relate to the use of bismaleimides as coagents in sulfur-vulcanization of rubber. These two patents are directed to vulcanization systems which contain a second coagent, presumably to improve upon the bismaleimide system.
However, despite the fact that some of the above patents claim to reduce reversion by addition of a bismaleimide, in actual practice the reduction in reversion achieved with the bismaleimides is insufficient. Accordingly, although the reversion and the heat resistance are slightly improved, the problem remains that there is no generally applicable anti-reversion agent which may be used in combination with a number of different rubber accelerators during the vulcanization process and which satisfactorily solves the reversion problem while at the same time significantly improving the heat resistance of sulfurvulcanized rubbers without having an adverse affect on other rubber properties.
Another type of curing system used to inhibit reversion in rubbers is disclosed in, "Latest Developments in the Urethane Crosslinking of Natural Rubber,"Kautschuk+Gummi-Kunstoffe 36, pp. 677-684, 1983. However, this so-called NOVOR system also suffers from several disadvantages including very limited applicability to particular vulcanization on processes.
Further, in Canadian Patent no. 738,500 the vulcanization of rubbers in the absence of sulfur, with either bis-maleimides and biscitraconimides, is disclosed. This process had, for its purpose, to be an alternative to sulfur-vulcanization processes. However, the rubber products made by the process of this patent suffer from the usual disadvantages of peroxide-cured rubbers such as low tensile strength and significant reductions in other important properties. This patent does not disclose the use of the bis-maleimides or bis-citraconimides in the sulfur-vulcanization of rubber.
The present invention provides a solution to the above problems by the use of a novel class of anti-reversion coagents in the sulfur-vulcanization of rubbers. More particularly, in a first aspect, the present invention relates to a sulfur-vulcanized rubber composition which comprises the vulcanization reaction product of:
(A) 100 parts by weight of at least one natural or synthetic rubber;
(B) 0.1 to 25 parts by weight of sulfur and/or a sufficient amount of a sulfur donor to provide the equivalent of 0.1 to 25 parts by weight of sulfur; and
(C) 0.1 to 5.0 parts by weight of a coagent which only partially reacts under sulfur-vulcanization reaction conditions up to optimum cure, and which, after optimum cure, forms cross-links bonded to the sulfur cross-linked rubber by a carbon-carbon linkage at a rate sufficient to compensate for from 10 to 200 percent of the reversion in said rubber composition.
In addition, the present invention relates to a vulcanization process carried out in the presence of the anti-reversion coagents and the use of these anti-reversion coagents in the sulfur-vulcanization of rubbers. Further, the invention also encompasses rubber products which comprise at least some rubber which has been vulcanized with sulfur in the presence of said anti-reversion coagents.
The present invention provides an excellent anti-reversion effect as well as improvements in several rubber properties without having a significant adverse effect on the remaining properties, when compared with similar sulfur-vulcanization systems using other coagents.
The present invention is applicable to all natural and synthetic rubbers. Examples of such rubbers include, but are not limited to, natural rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, butadiene rubber, isoprene rubber, acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber, chloroprene rubber, isopreneisobutylene rubber, brominated isoprene-isobutylene rubber, chlorinated isoprene-isobutylene rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymers, as well as combinations of two or more of these rubbers and combinations of one or more of these rubbers with other rubbers and/or thermoplastics.
Examples of sulfur which may be used in the present invention include various types of sulfur such as powdered sulfur, precipitated sulfur and insoluble sulfur. Also, sulfur donors may be used in place of, or in addition to sulfur in order to provide the required level of sulfur during the vulcanization process. Examples of such sulfur donors include, but are not limited to, tetramethylthiuram disulfide, tetraethylthiuram disulfide, tetrabutylthiuram disulfide, dipentamethylene thiuram hexasulfide, dipentamethylene thiuram tetrasulfide, dithiodimorpholine and mixtures thereof.
In this text, references to sulfur shall include sulfur donors and mixtures of sulfur and sulfur donors. Further, references to the quantity of sulfur employed in the vulcanization, when applied to sulfur donors, refer to a quantity of sulfur donor which is required to provide the equivalent amount of sulfur that is specified.
The anti-reversion coagents of the present invention are characterized by the fact that they must be capable of forming cross-links bonded to the rubber by a carbon-carbon linkage. This type of cross-link is known in the rubber literature from, for example, "High-temperature vulcanization of unsaturated rubbers by thio derivatives of maleimide," Krashennikov et al., Kauchuk i Rezina, No. 3, pp. 16-20, 1975. Such cross-links bonded to the rubber by a carbon-carbon linkage are highly desirable in rubbers, and particularly sulfurvulcanized rubbers since such cross-links are thermally stable.
Accordingly, we have found that it is desirable, in sulfurvulcanization, to produce cross-links bonded to the rubber by carbon-carbon linkages. For the purposes of this patent application, these cross-links will be hereinafter referred to as, "carbon-carbon" cross-links. In order to make a thermally stable rubber composition which still possesses the advantageous properties of sulfur-vulcanization, however, it remains necessary to combine the formation of carbon-carbon linkages with the formation of the stable monosulfidic cross-links which result from sulfur-vulcanization.
While it is possible to obtain a significant number of carbon-carbon cross-links by sulfur-vulcanizing rubber in the presence of bismaleimides, we have found that such rubbers still suffer from significant reversion (reduction in the cross-link density) upon thermal loading of the rubber after vulcanization. This leads to a corresponding decrease in some of the important properties of such rubber compositions during their use in, for example, tires.
While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is thought that the anti-reversion coagents of the present invention solve this long-standing problem since they are sufficiently unreactive under sulfur-vulcanization conditions such that, at optimum cure, a substantial portion of the coagent remains in the rubber composition in a form in which it is still capable of reacting with the sulfur-vulcanized rubber to form additional cross-links, which cross-links are bonded to the rubber by a carbon-carbon linkage.
One possible measure of the reactivity of the anti-reversion coagents under sulfur-vulcanization conditions up to optimum cure is cross-linking efficiency. Cross-linking efficiency, in the context of this patent application, refers to a measure of the percentage increase or decrease in shear modulus of the vulcanized rubber, per millimole of anti-reversion coagent, per 100 grams of rubber, as compared with the same rubber composition vulcanized under the same reaction conditions in the absence of the anti-reversion coagent. The shear modulus measurements for determining the cross-linking efficiency are made on a rubber composition at optimum cure. For a definition of optimum cure see, W. Holmann, "Rubber Technology Handbook."
For example, if 1 millimole of anti-reversion coagent, when compared to the t.sub.90 control, gives an increase in the shear modulus (as measured in accordance with the procedure of the examples hereafter) of 0.54 at optimum cure, then the cross-linking efficiency for that anti-reversion coagent is 0.5.% With t.sub.90 control is meant the optimum cure time of a rubber composition vulcanized without anti-reversion coagent. In addition, if for the same amount of coagent, 0.3% less cross-links are formed, then the cross-linking efficiency is -0.3.%
The cross-linking efficiency gives an indication of the influence of the coagent on the sulfur-vulcanization up to optimum cure and thereby an indication of the cross-linking reactivity of the coagent under sulfur-vulcanization conditions. In general, the anti-reversion coagents of the present invention exert little influence on the sulfur-vulcanized rubber up to optimum cure.
We have found that the preferred anti-reversion coagents of the present invention generally exhibit a cross-linking efficiency of between 2.0 and -2.0.% More preferred coagents have a cross-linking efficiency of 1.0 to -1.0, and most preferred coagents have a cross-linking efficiency of 0.5 to -0.5.% However, it should be noted that the cross-linking efficiency is only an inidication of the reactivity of the coagent up to optimum cure, and does not directly measure what is thought to be the important feature of the coagents of the present invention, namely that some of the coagent is still present at optimum cure in a form capable of reacting with the sulfur-vulcanized rubber to form additional cross-links. Thus, some useful coagents may have a higher or lower cross-linking efficiency but still fall within the scope of the present invention if they meet all of the other criteria.
The final characterizing feature of the coagents of the present invention is that they must form stable carbon-carbon cross-links at a rate sufficient to compensate for 10-200% of the reversion in that rubber composition. It is this final feature of the present coagents which prevents significant reversion of the sulfur-vulcanized rubber since, the degraded polysulfide cross-links are simply replaced by the thermally stable carbon-carbon cross-links formed by the anti-reversion coagents, thereby holding the torque at a relatively constant level.
The rate of formation of carbon-carbon cross-links after optimum cure can vary within a particular range depending upon how much reversion or marching can be tolerated in the particular rubber composition. Marching is when the compensation of the coagent exceeds the reversion such that, after optimum cure, a further increase in the cross-link density occurs. It is preferred that the coagent exhibit a reactivity which compensates for at least 10% of the reversion in the rubber composition and not more than 200% of the reversion. More preferably, the coagent compensates for from 40-150% of the reversion and most preferably for 70-120% of the reversion. Of course, the amount of anti-reversion compensation which is desired and/or acceptable depends to a great extent on the particular rubber composition, the application in which the rubber is used and the conditions to which the rubber will be exposed during its lifetime.
Anti-reversion coagents of the present invention include, but are not limited to compounds represented by the general formula A:
Q.sub.1 --D--(Q.sub.2).sub.n (A);
wherein D, optionally containing one or more heteroatoms or groups selected from nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, phosphorus, boron, sulphone and sulphoxy, is a monomeric or oligomeric divalent, trivalent or tetravatent group, n is an integer selected from 1, 2 or 3, Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.2 are independently selected from the formulas I and II: ##STR1## wherein R.sub.1, R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 are independently selected from hydrogen, C.sub.1 --C.sub.18 alkyl groups, C.sub.3 --C.sub.18 cycloalkyl groups, C.sub.6 --C.sub.18 aryl groups, C.sub.7 --C.sub.30 aralkyl groups and C.sub.7 --C.sub.30 alkaryl groups and R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 may combine to form a ring when R.sub.1 is hydrogen; B and B.sup.1 are independently selected from the following hetero atoms: oxygen and sulfur.
The imides of the present invention are, in general, known compounds and may be prepared by the methods disclosed in, "The synthesis of Biscitraconimides and Polybiscitraconimides," Galanti, A. V. and Scola, D. A., Journ. of Poly. Sci.: Polymer Chemistry Edition, Vol. 19, pp. 451-475, (1981); and "The Synthesis of Bisitaconamic Acids, Isomeric Bisimide Monomers," Galanti, A. V. et al., Journ. Poly. Sci.: Polymer Chemistry Edition, Vol. 20, pp. 233-239 (1982) and Hartford, S. L., Subramanian, S. and Parker, J. A., Journ. Poly. Sci.: Polymer Chemistry Edition, Vol. 16, p. 137, 1982, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The imide compounds useful in the present invention and represented by the formula A include, but are not limited to, the bis-citraconimides wherein Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.2 are of the formula I, R.sub.1 =R.sub.2 =R.sub.3 =H, n=1 and B=B.sup.1 =oxygen; the bis-itaconimides wherein Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.2 are of the formula II, R.sub.1 =R.sub.2 =R.sub.3 =H, n=1 and B=B.sup.1 =oxygen; the mixed citraconimide and itaconimide wherein Q.sub.1 is of the formula I, Q.sub.2 is of the formula II, R.sub.1 =R.sub.2 =R.sub.3 H, n:1 and B=B.sup.1 =oxygen; and mixtures of the above-mentioned compounds.
More specifically, the group D mentioned in the formula A can be a monomeric divalent, trivalent or tetravalent linear or branched radical chosen from a C.sub.1 --C.sub.18 alkyl, C.sub.2 --C.sub.18 alkenyl, C.sub.2 --C.sub.18 alkynyl, C.sub.3 --C.sub.18 cycloalkyl, C.sub.3 --C.sub.18 polycycloalkyl, C.sub.6 --C.sub.18 aryl, C.sub.6 --C.sub.30 polyaryl, C.sub.7 --C.sub.30 aralkyl, C.sub.7 --C.sub.30 alkaryl, oligomers of one or more of these radicals, and which radicals may optionally contain one or more of oxygen, nitrogen, silicon, phosphorus, sulphone, sulfoxy and boron, all of which radicals may also be optionally substituted at one or more of the atoms in the radical with a substituent selected from oxygen, nitrogen, silicon, SiO.sub.2, sulfoxy, boron, phosphorus, amido, imino, azo, diazo, hydrazo, azoxy, alkoxy, hydroxy, iodine, fluorine, bromine, chlorine, carbonyl, carboxy, ester, carboxylate, SO.sub.2, SO.sub.3, sulphonamido, SiO.sub.3, nitro, imido, thiocarbonyl, cyano, and epoxy groups.
More specific examples of some of the imide compounds useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to, the following:
N,N'-ethylene-bis-citraconic imide (BCI--C2);
N,N'-hexamethylene-bis-citraconic imide (BCI--C6);
N,N'-tetramethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-2-methyl-pentamethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,3-propylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(3,3'-oxydipropylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(aminodiethylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(aminodipropylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,10-(4,7-dioxa)-decanediyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-(di-(2-methylcyclohexyl)methylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-dicyclohexy-isopropylene)bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-dicyclohexyloxy)-bis-citracon imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-dicyclohexylene)-bis-citracon imide;
N,N'-o-phenylene-bis-citraconic imide; N,N'-m-phenylene-bis-citraconic imide(BCI-MP); N,N'-m-phenylene-bis-itaconic imide (BII-MP);
N,N'-p-phenylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(5-chloro-1,3-phenylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(5-hydroxy-1,3-phenylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(5-methoxy-1,3-phenylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(.alpha., .alpha.'-(1,3-dimethylphenylene) )-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-(1,10-decanediol-dibenzoate) )-bis-citraconic imide (BCI-BAE10); N,N'-(4,4'-diphenyl-bisphenol-A-ether)-bis-citraconic imide; N,N'-(4,4'-biphenylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-diphenylmethylene)-bis-citraconic imide (BCI-DPM);
N,N'-(4,4'-diphenylmethylene)-bis-itaconic imide (BII-DPM);
N,N'-m-xylylene-bis-citraconic imide (BCI-MX);
N,N'-(4,4'-diphenylisopropylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(3,3'-dimethyl-4,4'-biphenylene)-bis-citraconic imide:
N,N'-(3,3'-dichloro-4,4'-biphenylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(3,3'-difluoro-4,4'-biphenylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-oxydiphenylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-diphenylsulfone)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-diphenylcarboxy)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-(1,1-diphenylpropylene))-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-3,5-(1,2,4-triazole)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-dodecamethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(2,2,4-trimethylhexamethylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,11-(4,8-dioxa-undecanediyl))-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4,4'-benzophenonediyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,4-anthraquinonediyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,3-naphthalenediyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,4-naphthalenediyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,5-naphthalenediyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,3-cyclohexylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,4-cyclohexylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(5-methyl-1,3-phenylene)-bis-citraconc imide;
N,N'-(.alpha., .alpha.'-(1,3-dimethylcyclohexylene))-bis-citraconic imide (BCI-BAC);
N,N'-(.alpha.3-(1,1,5,5-tetramethyl-cyclohexylene))-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(isophoronyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(dimethyltricyclododecylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-octamethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,2-propylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-decamethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-heptamethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(5-bromo-1,3-phenylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,13-(7-aza-tridecanediyl))-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,7-(4-aza-heptanediyl))-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,11-(3,6,9-triaza-undecanediyl))-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(1,8-(3,6-diaza-octanediyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(N,N'-di-2-ethylpiperazinyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(2-hydroxy-1,3-propylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-N"-(2,4,6-trihexamethylene-isocyanuratetriyl)-tris-citraconic imde (TCI-AA33); N,N'-(3,5-benzoic aciddiyl)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-pentamethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-undecamethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(4-(N-methylene-citraconic imide)-octamethylene-bis-citraconic imide (TCI--C9v); N,N'-nonamethylene-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-(2-butyl-2-ethylpentamethylene)-bis-citraconic imide;
N,N'-polytetrahydrofuryl-bis-citraconic imide; N,N'-(Jeffamine D230.RTM.)-bis-citraconic imide; N,N'-(Jeffamine D2000.RTM.)-bis-citraconic imide; and N,N'-(Jeffamine ED600.RTM.)-bis-citraconic imide. Jeffamine D230.RTM., Jeffamine D2000.RTM. and Jeffamine ED600.RTM. are registered tradenames of the Texaco company. The biscitraconic imides based on these amines have the following general structure:
Q.sub.1 --CH(CH.sub.3)--CH.sub.2 -(O--CH.sub.2 --CH(CH.sub.3)).sub.m -O--CH.sub.2 CH(CH.sub.3)-Q.sub.2
Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.2 are as defined above. m represents from 1 up to 1000.
In addition, the bis-, tris- and tetra-itaconimides of the present invention may be the same as mentioned above, except that all citraconimide groups are exchanged for itaconimide groups. The same materials as mentioned above may be mixed imides if some of the citraconimide groups are exchanged for itaconimide groups.
The amount of sulfur to be compounded with the rubber is, based on 100 parts of rubber, usually 0.1 to 25 parts by weight, and more preferably 0.2 to 8 parts by weight. The amount of sulfur donor to be compounded with the rubber is an amount sufficient to provide an equivalent amount of sulfur which is the same as if sulfur itself were used.
The amount of anti-reversion coagent to be compounded with the rubber is, based on 100 parts of rubber, 0.1 to 5 parts by weight, and more preferably 0.2 to 3.0 parts by weight. These ingredients may be employed as a pre-mix, or added simultaneously or separately, and they may be added together with other rubber compounding ingredients as well.
In most circumstances it is also desirable to have a vulcanization accelerator in the rubber compound. Conventional, known vulcanization accelerators may be employed. The preferred vulcanization accelerators include mercaptobenzothiazole, 2,2'-mercaptobenzothiazole disulfide, sulfenamide accelerators including
N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide,
N-tertiary-butyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide,
N,N'-dicyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide, and 2-(morphol inothio)benzothiazole; thiophosphoric acid derivative accelerators, thiurams, dithiocarbamates, diphenyl guanidine, diorthotolyl guanidine, dithiocarbamylsulfenamides, xanthates, triazine accelerators and mixtures thereof.
When the vulcanization accelerator is employed, quantities of from 0.1 to 8 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of rubber composition, are used. More preferably, the vulcanization accelerator comprises 0.3 to 4.0 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of rubber.
Other conventional rubber additives may also be employed in their usual amounts. For example, reinforcing agents such as carbon black, silica, clay, whiting and other mineral fillers, as well as mixtures of fillers, may be included in the rubber composition. Other additives such as process oils, tackifiers, waxes, antioxidants, antiozonants, pigments, resins, plasticizers, process aids, factice, compounding agents and activators such as stearic acid and zinc oxide may be included in conventional, known amounts. For a more complete listing of rubber additives which may be used in combination with the present invention see, W. Hofmann, "Rubber Technology Handbook, Chapter 4, Rubber Chemicals and Additives, pp. 217-353, Hanser Publishers, Munich 1989.
Further, scorch retarders such as phthalic anhydride, pyromellitic anhydride, benzene hexacarboxylic trianhydride, 4-methylphthalic anhydride, trimellitic anhydride, 4-chlorophthalic anhydride, N-cyclohexyl-thiophthalimide, salicylic acid, benzoic acid, maleic anhydride and N-nitrosodiphenylamine may also be included in the rubber composition in conventional, known amounts. Finally, in specific applications it may also be desirable to include steel-cord adhesion promoters such as cobalt salts and dithiosulfates in conventional, known quantities.
The present invention also relates to a vulcanization process which comprises the step of vulcanizing at least one natural or synthetic rubber in the presence of 0.1 to 25 parts by weight of sulfur or a sulfur donor per 100 parts by weight of rubber, characterized in that said process is carried out in the presence of an effective amount of a coagent which only partially reacts under sulfur-vulcanization reaction conditions up to optimum cure, and which, after optimum cure, forms cross-links bonded to the sulfur cross-linked rubber by a carbon-carbon linkage at a rate sufficient to compensate for from 10 to 200 percent of the reversion in said rubber composition.
The process is carried out at a temperature of 110-220.degree. C. over a period of up to 24 hours. More preferably, the process is carried out at a temperature of 120-190.degree. C. over a period of up to 8 hours in the presence of 0.1 to 5.0 parts by weight of anti-reversion coagent. Even more preferable is the use of 0.2-3.0 parts by weight of antireversion coagent. All of the additives mentioned above with respect to the rubber composition may also be present during the vulcanization process of the invention.
In a more preferred embodiment of the vulcanization process, the vulcanization is carried out at a temperature of 120-190.degree. C. over a period of up to 8 hours and in the presence of 0.1 to 8.0 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of rubber, of at least one vulcanization accelerator.
In another preferred embodiment of the vulcanization process, the anti-reversion coagent is selected from a compound of the formula A.
The present invention also comprises the use of an anti-reversion coagent which only partially reacts under sulfur-vulcanization reaction conditions up to optimum cure, and which, after optimum cure, forms cross-links bonded to the sulfur cross-linked rubber by a carbon-carbon linkage at a rate sufficient to compensate for from 10 to 200 percent of the reversion in said rubber composition, in a process for the sulfur-vulcanization of rubber.
Finally, the present invention also includes articles of manufacture, such as tires, which comprise sulfur-vulcanized rubber which is vulcanized in the presence of the anti-reversion coagents of the present invention.
The invention is further illustrated by the following examples which are not to be construed as limiting the invention in any way. The scope of the invention is to be determined from the claims appended hereto.

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS USED IN THE EXAMPLES
Structural characterization of the rubber network
The cross-link density and the distribution of poly-, di- and monosulfidic and non-sulfidic cross-links has been determined in a rubber compound based on a natural rubber (NR) gum recipe (NR SMR CV5 100 parts, stearic acid 2 phr, ZnO RS 5 phr, Perkacit.RTM. CBS 0.6 phr, sulfur 2.3 phr), all amounts being related to the amount of rubber, which recipe was mixed on a two-roll mill and vulcanized as described below.
The density of cross-links was determined from the elastic constant (J. Mullins, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2, 1, 1959; J. Mooney et al., J. Appl. Physics, 11, 100, 1940) following the procedure given by Saville and Watson (Rubber Chem. Technol. 40, 100, 1967). The proportions of the sulfidic cross-links were determined by thiol-amine chemical probes (D. S. Campbell et al., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13, 1201, 1969 and Proc. Int. Conf. 5th, 1, 1967, 1968), and the proportions of non-sulfidic, carbon-carbon, cross-links by methyl iodide treatment (C. G. Moore et al., J. Polym. Sci. 19, 237, 1956 and 32, 503, 1958; M. L. Selker et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. 36, 20, 1944).
Compounding, Vulcanization and Characterization of Compounds
In the following examples, rubber compounding, vulcanization and testing was carried out according to standard methods except as otherwise stated:
Base compounds were mixed in a Farrel Bridge BR 1.6 liter Banbury type internal mixer (preheating at 50.degree. C., rotor speed 77 rpm, mixing time 6 min with full cooling). Vulcanization ingredients and coagents were added to the compounds on a Schwabenthan Polymix 150L two-roll mill (friction 1:1.22, temperature 70.degree. C., 3 min).
Mooney viscosity was determined using a Mooney viscosimeter MV 2000E at 100.degree. C. according to ASTM D1646-89.
Scorch times were determined using a Mooney viscosimeter MV 2000E at 121.degree. C. as time to until an increase of 5 Mooney units was observed (t+5; ASTM D 1646-89).
Cure characteristics were determined using a Goettfert elastograph or Monsanto rheometer ODR (arc 1.degree.) or MDR 2000E (arc 0.5.degree.): delta torque or extent of cross-linking (R.infin.) is the maximum torque (MH, also denoted as initial torque maximum, T.sub.i) minus the minimum torque (ML). Scorch safety (t.sub.s 2) is the time to 2% of delta torque above minimum torque (ML), optimum cure time (t.sub.90) is the time to 90% of delta torque above minimum, reversion time (t.sub.r 2) is the time to 2% of delta torque below maximum torque. Final torque (T.sub.f) is the torque measured after the overcure time.
Sheets and test specimens were vulcanized by compression molding in a Fontyne TP-400 press.
Tensile measurements were carried out using a Zwick 1445 tensile tester (ISO-2 dumbbells, tensile properties according to ASTM D 412-87, tear strength according to ASTM D 624-86).
Hardness was determined according to DIN 53505, and ISO 48 (IRHD).
Rebound resilience was measured at room temperature (RT) or at 100.degree. C. according to ASTM D 1054-87.
Compression set was determined after 24 h at 70.degree. C. or 72 h at 23.degree. C. according to ASTM D 395-89.
Heat build-up and compression set after dynamic loading were determined using a Goodrich Flexometer (load 1 MPa, stroke 0.445 cm, frequency 30 Hz, start temperature 100.degree. C., running time 30 min or till blow out; ASTM D 623-78).
Fatigue to failure was determined using a Monsanto FTFT tester (cam 24; ASTM D 4482 ).
Abrasion was determined using a Zwick abrasion tester as volume loss per 40 m path travelled (DIN 53516).
Dynamic mechanical analysis was carried out using an Eplexor Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (prestrain 10%, frequency 15 Hz, ASTM D 2231)
Examples 1-5 and Comparative Examples A and B
Five different imide anti-reversion agents in accordance with the present invention were prepared and tested in the sulfur vulcanization process according to the present invention. The imides employed were the following:
1. N,N'-m-phenylene-bis-citraconic imide (BCI-MP);
2. N,N'-ethylene-bis-citraconic imide (BCI--C2);
3. N,N'-hexamethylene-bis-citraconic imide (BCI--C6);
4. N,N'-1,3-dimethyl-cyclohexyl-bis-citraconic imide (BCI-BAC);
5. N,N'-m-xylylene-bis-citraconic imide (BCI-MX);and
A. N,N'-m-phenylene-bis-maleimide (HVA-2.RTM.) (ex. Du Pont);
The accelerator employed was n-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide (CBS). Comparative example B was a control example with no anti-reversion additive. Natural rubber was vulcanized in the presence of the foregoing compounds using the formulations listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1______________________________________Example No. 1 2 3 4 5 A B______________________________________CompoundNatural Rubber 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Carbon Black 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Zinc Oxide 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Stearic Acid 2 2 2 2 2 2 2CBS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Sulfur 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3BCI-MP 1.5 -- -- -- -- -- --BCI-C2 -- 1.2 -- -- -- -- --BCI-C6 -- -- 1.5 -- -- -- --BCI-BAC -- -- -- 1.6 -- -- --BCI-MX -- -- -- -- 1.6 -- --HVA-2 .RTM. -- -- -- -- -- 1.3 --______________________________________
The vulcanized rubbers listed in Table 1 were then tested for anti-reversion and other physical properties upon overcure. The results are given in Table 2.
TABLE 2______________________________________Evaluation of bis-citraconimides for improvement ofmechanical properties relative to bis-maleimide upon(over)cure at 180.degree. C. for 60 minutes.Example No. 1 2 3 4 5 A B______________________________________MechanicalpropertyHardness (Sh A) 70 68 69 68 69 67 62Modulus 300% 13.3 13.2 13.8 18.4 19.4 10.5 9.0(MPa)Tensile strength 17.4 19.8 23.0 21.4 21.4 18.3 17.4(MPa)Compression set 9.8 8.0 8.9 -- -- 12.1 11.0Reversion (%)* -3 -2 -13 -4 -6 22 30______________________________________ *Reversion ##STR2## [Mod. 300%, at 180.degree. C. t.sub.90 ] - [Mod. 300%, at 180.degree. C. 60 min.]- (.times. 100) [ Mod. 300%, at 150.degree. C., t.sub.90 -- = not tested
These results show that with the known bis-maleimide anti-reversion agent a reduced reversion was observed (22%). No reversion is represented by 0%. All of the anti-reversion agents of the present invention were significantly superior to the bis-maleimide, as can be seen from the observed physical properties wherein the bis-citraconimides gave higher 300% modulus values than the bis-maleimide. The agents of the present invention gave satisfactory properties due to their anti-reversion effect.
Example 6 and Comparative Examples C-F
The effects of several materials on the vulcanization curve of natural rubber vulcanized at 180.degree. C. were determined. In addition to HVA-2.RTM. and BCI-MP, the following materials were employed:
D. Phenyl-maleimide (PMI) (ex. Janssen Chimica);and
E. Phenyl-citraconimide (PCI).
The accelerators employed were 2,2'-mercaptobenzothiazole disulfide (MBTS). Comparative example F was a control example with no anti-reversion additive. The rubber formulations which were employed are given in Table 3.
TABLE 3______________________________________Example 6 C D E F______________________________________CompoundNatural Rubber 100 100 100 100 100Carbon Black 50 50 50 50 50Zinc Oxide 5 5 5 5 5Stearic Acid 2 2 2 2 2MBTS 1 1 1 1 1Sulfur 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25HVA-2 -- 2.0 -- -- --PMI -- -- 2.6 -- --PCI -- -- -- 2.8 --______________________________________
Vulcanization curves were measured with a Gottfert Elastograph at 180.degree. C. for a period up to 60 minutes. The anti-reversion effect can be seen by comparing the final torque (T.sub.f) with the initial torque maximum (T.sub.i).
TABLE 4______________________________________Torque (Nm) T.sub.i T.sub.f______________________________________Example6 0.96 1.13C 1.14 0.89D 0.90 0.72E 0.82 0.38F 0.88 0.55______________________________________
As in the previous examples, the BCI-MP anti-reversion agent slightly over-compensated for the reversion thereby providing a rubber with satisfactory physical properties. The PCI enhanced the reversion effect on the control example. The HVA-2.RTM. increased the viscosity during the vulcanization more than the PMI did but neither of these agents compensated as much for the reversion effect as did the BCI-MP.
Examples 7-14 and Comparative Example G
In these examples four different accelerators were used in combination with the anti-reversion agents of the present invention in order to demonstrate that the anti-reversion effect is independent of the accelerator employed. The rubber formulations shown in table 4 were vulcanized in accordance with the present invention.
The accelerators employed for these tests included MBTS, CBS, N,N'-dicyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide (DCBS) and MBS.
TABLE 5______________________________________Example 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14______________________________________CompoundNatural 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100RubberCarbon Black 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Zinc Oxide 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Stearic Acid 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2MBTS 1 -- -- -- 1 -- -- --CBS -- 1 -- -- -- 1 -- --MBS -- -- 1 -- -- -- 1DCBS -- -- -- 1 -- -- -- 1Sulfur 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3BCI-MP 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 -- -- -- --BCI-C6 -- -- -- -- 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5______________________________________
All of the formulations gave similar vulcanization curves with superior torque retention upon overcure as compared with the controls without BCI. Mathematical analysis of the vulcanization curves showed that the anti-reversion effect was not influenced by the type of vulcanization accelerator used.
Examples 15-17
These examples compare the effects of different concentrations of N,N'-hexamethylene-bis-citraconimide. The results of vulcanization with three different concentrations of anti-reversion agents are given in Table 6.
To obtain the results given in Table 6, vulcanization was carried out at 180.degree. C. over a period of 60 minutes.
TABLE 6______________________________________Example 15 16 17 G______________________________________CompoundNatural Rubber 100 100 100 100Carbon Black 50 50 50 50Zinc Oxide 5 5 5 5Stearic Acid 2 2 2 2CBS 1 1 1 1Sulfur 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3BCI-C6 0.75 1.5 2.25 --Hardness (Shore A) 63 65 67 58Modulus (MPa)100% 3.3 3.8 4.5 2.1300% 15.9 18.6 20.5 10.7______________________________________
These results demonstrate that at varying concentrations the composition of the present invention gave generally superior hardness and modulus at all concentrations.
Examples 18-20 and Comparative Examples H and I
These examples demonstrate that the rubbers in accordance with the present invention exhibit significantly better properties after ageing than prior art rubbers do. More particularly, the compositions shown in Table 7 were vulcanized under three different sets of vulcanization conditions, and then subjected to ageing for 48 hours at 100.degree. C.
The results given in Table 7 were obtained from vulcanization at 150.degree. C. for a period of 7-11 minutes. The results given in Table 8, in which similarly numbered and lettered examples employed the same quantities of all ingredients, were obtained from vulcanization at 180.degree. C. for a period of 2 minutes, and the results given in Table 9 were obtained from vulcanization at 180.degree. C. for a period of 60 minutes.
TABLE 7______________________________________Example H1 I1 18a 19a 20a______________________________________Natural Rubber 100 100 100 100 100Carbon Black 50 50 50 50 50Zinc Oxide 5 5 5 5 5Stearic Acid 2 2 2 2 2CBS 1 1 1 1 1Sulfur 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3HVA-2 .RTM. -- 1.3 -- -- --BCI-MP -- -- 1.5 -- --BCI-C2 -- -- -- 1.2 --BCI-C6 -- -- -- -- 1.5Ageing PropertiesHardness (Shore A) 61 60 69 66 64Modulus (MPa) 100% 3.5 3.2 4.2 3.7 3.7Tensile Strength (MPa) 7.2 5.9 7.9 8.4 8.7______________________________________
TABLE 8______________________________________Example H2 I2 18b 19b 20b______________________________________Ageing PropertiesHardness (Shore A) 62 62 66 65 64Modulus (MPa) 100% 3.4 3.4 4.3 3.9 3.8Tensile Strength (MPa) 6.6 6.4 7.7 8.3 7.0______________________________________
TABLE 9______________________________________Example H3 I3 18c 19c 20c______________________________________Ageing PropertiesHardness (Shore A) 52 60 63 59 63Modulus (MPa) 100% 2.3 2.4 3.0 3.1 3.0Tensile Strength (MPa) 6.4 6.7 8.1 9.3 8.7______________________________________
These results show that, in general, the rubbers of the present invention exhibit superior properties after ageing as compared with comparable prior art rubber compositions.
Examples 21-22 and Comparative Example J
The effect of two anti-reversion agents of the present invention was tested in three different CBS/sulfur vulcanization systems: conventional (C.V), semi-efficient (semi-E.V.) and efficient (E.V.). In addition to BCI-MP and BCI--C6 a comparative HVA-2.RTM.-containing example was employed.
The rubber formulations which were employed with C.V. are given in Table 10. Similarly lettered examples employed the same quantities of all the ingredients except for the vulcanization accelerator and sulfur contents. The amounts of vulcanization accelerator and sulfur in the rubber formulations considered to be semi-E.V. are given in Table 11. The amounts of vulcanization accelerator and sulfur in the rubber formulations considered to be E.V. are given in Table 12.
TABLE 10______________________________________Example 21a 22a Ja______________________________________CompoundNatural Rubber 100 100 100Carbon Black 50 50 50Zinc Oxide 5 5 5Resin Pine Tar 2 2 2BCI-MP 1.5 -- --BCI-C6 -- 1.5 --HVA-2 .RTM. -- -- 1.3CBS 0.6 0.6 0.6Sulfur 2.3 2.3 2.3______________________________________
TABLE 11______________________________________Example 21b 22b Jb______________________________________CompoundCBS 1.5 1.5 1.5Sulfur 1.5 1.5 1.5______________________________________
TABLE 12______________________________________Example 21c 22c Jc______________________________________CompoundCBS 4.0 4.0 4.0Sulfur 0.5 0.5 0.5______________________________________
To obtain the results given in Table 13, vulcanization was carried out at 180.degree. C. over a period of 60 minutes. The anti-reversion effect can be seen by comparing the final torque (T.sub.f) with the initial torque maximum (T.sub.i ).
TABLE 13______________________________________torque (dNm) T.sub.i T.sub.f______________________________________Example21a 16.25 1922a 16.25 18.8Ja 19.5 15.021b 17.8 18.822b 17.5 18.0Jb 21.6 16.021c 13.7 17.522c 13.0 13.5Jc 16 13.5______________________________________
The compensation effects of the anti-reversion agents according to the present invention were quite similar in C.V. and semi-E.V., but decreased for the efficient cure system. HVA-2.RTM.showed vulcanization curves initially reflecting high reactivity, but due to reversion a low final torque resulted. Compared with the anti-reversion agents of the present invention the contribution of HVA-2.RTM.to the cure curves was relatively less dependent on the efficiency of the cure system.
BCI-MP and BCI-C6 have a significant anti-reversion effect in C.V. and semi- E.V. NR-based formulations. The effect on E.V compounds is smaller, but also less relevant in E.V compounds. The anti-reversion effect of BCI's is probably a synergistic effect with sulfur. HVA-2.RTM. shows inferior anti-reversion effects in the cure curves as compared with the anti-reversion agents of the present invention.
Examples 23-27
The effect of mixed itaconimide and citraconimide groups was tested for hexamethylene bisimide derivatives (BI--C6). Also the bis-itaconimide of diphenylmethane (BII-DPM) was compared with the bis-citracon imide thereof (BCI-DPM). The rubber formulations which were employed are given in Table 14.
TABLE 14______________________________________Example No. 23 24 25 26 27______________________________________CompoundNatural Rubber 100 100 100 100 100Carbon Black 50 50 50 50 50Stearic Acid 2 2 2 2 2Zinc Oxide 5 5 5 5 5Resin Pine Tar 3 3 3 3 3CBS 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6Sulphur 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3BI (97,5/2.5).sup.1 -C6 1.5 -- -- -- --BI (70/30).sup.1 -C6 -- 1.5 -- -- --BI(37/63).sup.1 -C6 -- -- 1.5 -- --BCI-DPM -- -- -- 1.9 --BII-DPM -- -- -- -- 1.9______________________________________ .sup.1 The relative citraconimide/itaconimide content (mole %/mole %) is given in parentheses.
To obtain the results given in Table 15, vulcanization was carried out at 180.degree. C. over a period of 60 minutes. The anti-reversion effect can be seen by comparing T.sub.f with T.sub.i.
TABLE 15______________________________________torque (dNm) T.sub.i T.sub.f______________________________________Example23 16 17.624 16 17.625 16 17.626 16.3 20.527 17.4 18.5______________________________________
The different hexamethylene citraconimide derivatives with itaconimide contents of 2.5% (BCI--C6), 30% and 63%, respectively, gave similar vulcanization curves. The diphenylmethane derivatives of BCI and BII showed anti-reversion effects close to those of BCI-MP. The BII-DMP showed an improved modulus after vulcanization at 180.degree. C.
Examples 28-35
The effects of BCI-MP on the physical properties of natural rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) and different rubber blends (e.g NR-BR and SBR-BR, NR being natural rubber and BR being butadiene rubber) were investigated.
The formulations of the NR and SBR compounds are listed in Table 16.
TABLE 16______________________________________ Example No.Compounds 28 29 30 31______________________________________NR 100 100 -- --SBR -- -- 100 100Carbon Black 50 50 50 50Stearic acid 2 2 2 2Zinc Oxide 5 5 5 5Aromatic oil A.sup.1 -- -- 3 3Aromatic oil B.sup.2 3 3 -- --BCI-MP -- 1.5 -- 1.5CBS 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6Sulfur 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3______________________________________ .sup.1 aromatic oil Dutrex 729 HP .sup.2 aromatic oil Enerflex 72 .RTM.-
The formulations of the NR-BR and SBR-BR blends are listed in Table 17.
TABLE 17______________________________________ Example No.Compounds 32 33 34 35______________________________________NR 80 80 -- --SBR -- -- 55 55BR 20 20 45 45Carbon Black 50 50 50 50Stearic Acid 2 2 2 2Zinc Oxide 5 5 5 5Aromatic oil A 3 3 3 3BCI-MP -- 1.5 -- 1.5CBS 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6Sulfur 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3______________________________________
Mixing procedure for the blend
In a banbury mixer separate rubber masterbatches were mixed to ensure homogeneous carbon dispersion.
The additional ingredients, including BCI-MP, were added to the masterbatch according to the formulations of Table 17 and mixed. After 24 hours the masterbatches were cross-blended in the banbury mixer for 3 minutes. After an additional 24 hours, the batches were finalized on a mill on addition of sulfur and accelerators.
The cure characteristics of the examples obtained at 150.degree. C. are listed in Table 18 and the values obtained at 180.degree. C. are presented in Table 19. At the optimum cure time (opt. cure time (t.sub.90)) the torque was at its maximum. At the reversion time the torque started to decrease.
TABLE 18______________________________________Characteristics Cross-linking Scorch safety Opt. cure ReversionExample R.infin., dNm t.sub.S 2, min time, min time, min______________________________________28a 18.5 4.1 11.0 24.329a 18.7 4.2 12.4 --30a 20.7 10.1 24.1 --31a 22.6 10.4 24.3 --32a 20.4 4.9 12.8 28.833a 20.1 4.8 13.0 --34a 23.6 9.4 26.2 --35a 23.7 9.7 26.0 --______________________________________
TABLE 19______________________________________28b 15.3 0.6 1.6 2.329b 15.2 0.6 1.7 --30b 20.5 1.2 4.3 12.531b 22.8 1.2 27 --32b 17.1 0.6 1.9 3.133b 16.4 0.6 7.9 --34b 27.1 1.0 4.0 20.235b 22.5 1.1 5.5 --______________________________________ -- indicates no reversion
Tables 20 and 21 give the resulting properties of the cured products obtained, a-indices referring to curing at 150.degree. C. up to optimal cure, t.sub.90 and b-indices referring to curing at 180.degree. C. over a period of 60 minutes.
TABLE 20______________________________________ Example No.Properties 28a 28b 29a 29b 30a 30b 31a 31b______________________________________Hardness, 61 42 53 51 67 66 69 69Shore A,MPaModulus,MPa50% 0.95 0.64 0.97 0.96 1.86 1.65 1.89 1.96100% 1.63 0.96 1.66 1.68 3.66 2.92 3.53 4.01300% 8.33 4.59 8.45 8.76 20.1 16.1 18.9 21.5Tensile 25.6 13.5 24.8 15.8 29.5 21.4 26.6 22.9Strength,MPaElongation 590 545 595 429 423 387 379 294at break, %______________________________________
TABLE 21______________________________________ Example NoProperties 32a 32b 33a 33b 34a 34b 35a 35b______________________________________Hardness, 67 61 67 69 67 64 67 69Shore A,MPaModulus,MPa50% 1.61 1.29 1.49 1.75 1.53 1.47 1.56 1.75100% 3.09 2.22 2.67 3.29 2.49 2.40 2.51 3.06300% 15.4 11.1 13.5 15.9 12.9 12.5 12.4 16.2Tensile 27.2 17.4 29.7 20.5 22.0 20.9 20.9 19.0Strength,MPaElongation 503 417 513 389 454 458 442 313at break, %______________________________________
As already shown in previous examples, BCI-MP has a remarkable effect by counteracting the reversion phenomenon in NR formulations. This is also true for SBR, NR-BR and SBR-BR formulations. The mechanical properties of the SBR, NR-BR and SBR-BR vulcanizates with BCI-MP are well retained, especially on over-cure.
Examples 36-41
Tire formulations with common ingredients were prepared employing various BCI-MP contents. A truck tire tread compound recipe according to "C.S.L. Baker c.s., Elastomerics, Jul. 1989, pp 20-25" is listed in Table 22, example 36. Various BCI-contents were added to this composition (examples 37-41). The resulting mechanical properties obtained by vulcanization at 150.degree. C. up to optimum cure, are given in Table 23, the ones obtained by vulcanization at 180.degree. C. overcured for 60 minutes, in Table 24.
TABLE 22______________________________________ Example No.Compound 36 37 38 39 40 41______________________________________NR 80 80 80 80 80 80BR 20 20 20 20 20 20Carbon Black 55 55 55 55 55 55Stearic Acid 2 2 2 2 2 2Zinc Oxide 4 4 4 4 4 4Aromatic oil A 8 8 8 8 8 8Permanax 6PPD .RTM. 2 2 2 2 2 2BCI-MP -- 0.5 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50CBS 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2Sulfur 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2______________________________________
TABLE 23______________________________________ Example NoProperties 36a 37a 38a 39a 40a 41a______________________________________Hardness, Sh A 60 62 62 63 63 64Modulus50% 1.17 1.14 1.15 1.14 1.20 1.14100% 2.05 1.92 1.91 1.88 2.04 1.95300% 10.8 10.3 10.6 10.4 10.8 10.8Tensile 24.0 25.1 24.7 24.2 24.0 23.2Strength, MPaElongation at 556 600 571 574 568 535break, %Tear strength, 119 107 114 110 110 111N/mm______________________________________
TABLE 24______________________________________ Example NoProperties 36b 37b 38b 39b 40b 41b______________________________________Hardness, Sh A 55 60 62 64 63 66Modulus50% 1.02 1.07 1.19 1.33 1.35 1.32100% 1.65 1.71 1.82 2.37 2.37 2.30300% 8.5 8.8 10.0 11.9 12.0 11.5Tensile 16.5 18.3 20.4 20.7 20.6 20.4Strength, MPaElongation at 482 502 501 489 461 460break, %Tear strength, 41 60 64 66 166 68N/mm______________________________________
These experiments show that BCI-MP can be used in various quantities to improve the reversion resistance of tire compounds.
Example 42
Structural characterization of rubber networks
NR gum stocks (NR 100 parts, zinc oxide 5 phr, stearic acid 2 phr, CBS 0.6 phr and sulfur 2.3 phr) were compounded with various coagents: phenylmaleimide (PMI), HVA-2.RTM., phenylcitraconimide (PCI) and BCI-MX (all 1.5 phr). The compounds were vulcanized at 150.degree. C. until optimum cure (t.sub.90) and at 170.degree. C. for 30 min. The number and distribution of types of cross-links were determined as described above and presented in TABLES 25 and 26.
TABLE 25______________________________________Distribution of crosslinks in vulcanizates obtained at 150.degree. C.cured up to t.sub.90. Total Poly Di- Mono- C--C crosslinks* Sulfidic sulfidic sulfidic CrosslinksCompound .times. 10*5 .times. 10*5 .times. 10*5 .times. 10*5 .times. 10*5______________________________________Control 5.05 3.18 1.87 -- -- (63%) (37%)HVA-2 .RTM. 6.30 2.91 1.64 0.17 1.57 (46%) (26%) (3%) (25%)PMI 5.42 3.20 1.96 -- 0.26 (59%) (36%) -- (5%)PCI 4.92 3.18 1.75 -- -- (65%) (35%)BCI-MX 5.04 2.94 2.10 -- -- (58%) (42%)______________________________________ *Concentration of crosslinks are expressed in terms of Gram mole per gram of RH.
TABLE 26______________________________________Distribution of crosslinks in vulcanizates obtained at 170.degree. C.andovercured for 30 minutes Total Poly Di- Mono- C--C crosslinks* Sulfidic sulfidic sulfidic CrosslinksCompound .times. 10*5 .times. 10*5 .times. 10*5 .times. 10*5 .times. 10*5______________________________________Control 2.05 0.04 0.06 1.94 -- (2%) (5%) (93%)HVA-2 .RTM. 2.2 0.11 0.11 1.32 0.67 (5%) (5%) (60%) (30%)PMI 2.12 0.008 0.03 1.93 0.15 (2%) (91%) (7%)PCI 1.86 0.05 0.10 1.71 -- (3%) (5%) (92%)BCI-MX 2.54 0.03 0.10 0.88 1.53 (1%) (4%) (35%) (60%)______________________________________ *Concentration of crosslinks are expressed in terms of Gram mole per gram of RH.
After optimum cure at 150.degree. C. only PMI and BMI-MP gave an increased number of total cross-links as compared to the control which consisted besides sulfidic also of non-sulfidic carbon-carbon type crosslinks. Similarly cured compounds with PCI and BCI-MX showed no additional contribution to the total crosslinks and no C--C type crosslinks.
These results indicate that coagents such as biscitraconimides have substantially no influence on the total cross-link density up to optimal cure in contrast to bismaleimides.
Example 43
Extraction Experiments
Sheets of NR gum stock with 1.5 phr HVA-2.RTM.or BCI-MP vulcanized at 150.degree. C. until optimum cure were extracted with chloroform in a Soxhlet apparatus over a 24 hour period. The extract was evaporated, dissolved in deuterated chloroform and examined with H-NMR. The extract from the HVA-2.RTM. containing sheet did not show a detectable quantity of bismaleimide, whereas BCI-MP was successfully extracted from the sheet containing BCI-MP. This indicates that unreacted BCI-MP was present in the vulcanizate.
Example 44
Compounding BCI with rubber on a two-roll mill and in a Banbury internal mixer
BCI-MP was compounded with a NR rubber recipe (NR SMR CV5: 100 parts, carbon black N-330 50 phr, stearic acid 2 phr, zinc oxide RS 5 phr, aromatic oil (Dutrex 729 HP.RTM.) 3 phr, Perkacit.RTM. CBS 0.6 phr and sulfur 2.3 phr) by different procedures;
a. The ingredients, excepting CBS, sulfur and BCI-MP, were mixed in a Banbury internal mixer at 135-140.degree. C. stepwise for 6 minutes. Then, the vulcanization agents and the BCI-MP (1.5 phr) were mixed on a two-roll mill at 60-70.degree. C.
b. The ingredients including 1.5 phr BCI-MP and excepting sulfur and CBS, were mixed in the Banbury and the CBS and sulfur were added on a two-roll mill.
Then, the cure characteristics of these compounds and a control compound containing no BCI-MP were determined using a Monsanto rheometer MDR 2000E at 180.degree. C. during a 60 minute period.
Monsanto rheometer data obtained at 150.degree. C. (data in parenthesis are obtained at 180.degree. C. )
There was no difference in anti-reversion effect according to the cure characteristics after either following the two-roll mill or Banbury procedure for compounding.
TABLE 27______________________________________ Procedure Procedure Control a) b)______________________________________Scorch safety, t.sub.S 2 11.0 12.4 12.5(min) (1.6) (1.7) (1.6)Cure time, t.sub.90 (min) 4.1 4.2 4.2 (0.6) (0.6) (0.6)Extent of crosslinking, 18.5 18.7 19.3R.infin. (dNm)Monsanto rheometer curecurve at 180.degree. C., 60 min(dNm):T.sub.i 17.3 17.3 17.4T.sub.f 11.5 19.0 19.0______________________________________
Example 45
Properties of NR/SBR and NR compounds with BCI-MP
A carbon black-filled NR compound with conventional amounts of activators, processing oil, antidegradants and a C.V. curing system with 1.8 phr sulfur, and an NR/SBR (75/25) blend with conventional amounts of activators, oils, antidegradants, wax and a semi-E. V. curing system with 1.5 phr sulfur were mixed with 0.5 or 1.0 phr BCI-MP according to a standard procedure as described above. In control compounds, BCI-MP was omitted.
Tables 28 and 29 show that there is slight or no influence of BCI-MP on scorch and cure characteristics of the NR/SBR and NR compounds. The reversion time at 170.degree. C. is always increased. A Monsanto rheometer ODR was used for the determination of cure characteristics.
TABLE 28______________________________________Scorch and Cure characteristics* of NR-SBR compounds. 2 3 1 (BCI-MP (BCI-MPCompound (control) 0.5 phr) 1.0 phr)______________________________________Mooney scorch time 43 42 43minCure at 150.degree. C.:Extent of crosslinking, 2.53 2.50 2.45R.infin., NmScorch safety, t.sub.S 2, min. 8.0 8.0 7.5Optimum curetime, t.sub.90, 14.5 14.0 14.0min.Reversion time, t.sub.r 2, (--) (--) (--)min.Cure at 170.degree. C.:Extent of crosslinking, 2.25 2.25 2.25R.infin., NmScorch safety, t.sub.S 2, min. 2.5 2.5 2.5Optimum cure time, t.sub.90, min. 5.0 5.0 5.0Reversion time, t.sub.r 2, 23.0 (--) (--)min.______________________________________ (--) indicates no reversion *Monsanto rheometer ODR
TABLE 29______________________________________Scorch and Cure* characteristics of NR compounds. 5 6 4 (BCI-MP (BCI-MPCompound (control) 0.5 phr) 1.0 phr)______________________________________Mooney scorch time 41 41 42minCure at 150.degree. C.:Extent of crosslinking, 2.77 2.70 2.70R.infin., NmScorch safety, t.sub.S 2, min. 5.8 6.3 6.2Optimum cure time, t.sub.90, min. 13.8 14.0 14.0Cure at 170.degree. C.:Extent of crosslinking, 2.4 2.3 2.4R.infin., NmScorch safety, t.sub.S 2, min. 1.6 1.7 1.9Optimum cure time, t.sub.90, min. 4.1 3.9 4.3Reversion time, t.sub.r 2, 10.5 16.4 (--)min.______________________________________ (--) indicates no reversion *Monsanto rheometer ODR
TABLES 30 and 31 show improvements obtained in the NR/SBR and NR compounds with BCI-MP regarding hardness, modulus, tensile strength, tear strength, compression set, and abrasion.
TABLE 30______________________________________Mechanical properties of the vulcanizates cured at 150.degree. C. fort.sub.90and at 170.degree. C. for 30 min. (overcured shown between parenthesis).Compound 1 2 3______________________________________Hardness, Shore A 57.0 60.0 60.0 (54.5) (59.5) (60.0)Modulus50%, MPa 1.20 1.15 1.20 (0.90) (1.15) (1.20)100%, MPa 1.90 1.85 1.80 (1.35) (1.81) (1.90)300%, MPa 9.30 9.45 9.0 (6.51) (8.90) (9.95)Tensile strength, MPa 23.2 23.1 23.3 (15.5) (19.0) (20.1)Tear strength, KN/m 89.0 86.5 82.5 (46.5) (61.5) (58.5)Compression set, %24 h/70.degree. C. 21 23 22 (26) (25) (24)72 h/23.degree. C. 15 14 12 (20) (17) (17)Abrasion (volume loss 102 103 105mm.sup.3 /40 m path travelled) (201) (131) (117)______________________________________
TABLE 31______________________________________Mechanical properties of the vulcanizates cured at 150.degree. C. fort.sub.90and at 170.degree. C. for 30 min. (overcured shown in parenthesis).Compound 4 5 6______________________________________Hardness, Shore A 60 62 64 (52) (57) (60)Modulus50%, MPa 1.15 1.20 1.20 (0.88) (1.04) (1.20)100%, MPa 2.06 2.15 2.10 (1.30) (1.65) (2.00)300%, MPa 11.8 11.4 11.4 (6.6) (8.6) (10.7)Tensile strength, MPa 27.2 28.0 28.5 (18.2) (21.3) (21.3)Tear strength, KN/m 101 119 136 (25.5) (39.0) (58.0)Compression set, %24 h/70.degree. C. 21 23 23 (33) (28) (24)72 h/23.degree. C. 9 10 23 (17) (13) (12)Abrasion (volume loss 122 121 122mm.sup.3 /40 m path travelled) (214) (172) (145)______________________________________
TABLES 32 and 33 show substantial reduction of heat build up (temperature rise) and permanent set in the Goodrich flexometer test and improved fatigue resistance of the compounds containing BCI-MP cured at 170.degree. C. for 30 min.
TABLE 32______________________________________Heat build up and permanent set properties of overcuredvulcanizates (170.degree. C., 30 minutes)______________________________________a) NR/SBR Compounds 1 2 3 (control) (BCI-MP (BCI-MP 0.5 phr) 1.0 phr)Temperature rise, 42 30 26.DELTA.t, .degree.C.Permanent set, % 12.0 8.1 5.4b) NR Compounds 4 5 6 (control) (BCI-MP (BCI-MP 0.5 phr) 1.0 phr)Temperature rise, 52 31 24.DELTA.t, .degree.C.Permanent set, % 17.2 8.2 5.2______________________________________
TABLE 33______________________________________Fatigue to Failure properties of overcured vulcanizates (170.degree. C.,30 minutes)______________________________________a) NR/SBR Compounds 1 2 3 (control) (BCI-MP (BCI-MP 0.5 phr) 1.0 phr)Number of Kilo cycles 37.5 38.1 41.2to Failure(b) NR-Compounds 4 5 6 (control) (BCI-MP (BCI-MP 0.5 phr) 1.0 phr)Number of Kilo cycles 50.1 53.7 55.4to Failure______________________________________
Increased loss modulus (E") as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis of the NR/SBR blend with BCI-MP as shown in TABLE 34 can contribute to the improvement of tire properties such as wet grip or skid resistance (K. A. Grosch, Nature, 197,858, 1963).
TABLE 34______________________________________Dynamic-mechanical data (at 20.degree. C.) of NR/SBR vulcanizatescured at 150.degree. C./t.sub.90. E' E" E*Compound MPa MPa MPa tan.delta.______________________________________1(Control) 18.3 2.8 18.5 0.1522(BCI-MP 0.5 phr) 22.2 3.2 22.4 0.1453(BCI-MP 1.0 phr) 24.4 3.6 24.7 0.148______________________________________
Increased storage modulus (E') and decreased loss tangent (tan.delta.) measured at 60.degree. C. as shown in TABLE 35 imply a lower loss compliance (tan.delta./E') which can contribute to improved tire properties such as reduced rolling resistance (J. M. Collins et al., Trans. Inst. Rubber Ind. 40, T239, 1964), which by consequence leads to fuel savings during service.
TABLE 35______________________________________Dynamic-mechanical data (at 60.degree. C.) of NR-vulcanizatescured at 170.degree. C./30 min. E' E" E*Compound MPa MPa MPa tan.delta.______________________________________4(Control) 8.2 1.3 8.3 0.1606(+BCI-MP 1.0 phr) 9.3 1.1 9.4 0.119______________________________________
Example 46
NR/BR compound with various BCI's
An NR/BR recipe (see Example 36), useful as truck tire tread compound (C.S.L. Baker c.s., Elastomerics, Jul. 1989, pp.20-25) has been used to test the effects of various BCI's. Compounding was done with 1.0 phr BCI-MP, BCI-DPM and BCI-MX as described above (Example 36). Vulcanization was done by compression moulding at 150.degree. C. (t.sub.90 and 60 min) and 170.degree. C. (t.sub.90 and 30 min).
TABLE 36 shows that BCI's have slight or no effect on Mooney viscosity, scorch time and cure characteristics.
TABLE 36______________________________________ BCI- BCI- BCI- Control MP DPM MX______________________________________Mooney viscosity (MU) 46.4 42.6 45.2 45.3Mooney Scorch time (min) 36.1 36.1 36.4 35.5Monsanto rheometer curedata (150.degree. C.)t.sub.S 2 5.0 5.2 5.5 5.2t.sub.90 8.3 8.4 8.7 8.6Delta torque (Nm) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5Monsanto rheometer curedata (170.degree. C.)t.sub.S 2 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7t.sub.90 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7Delta torque (Nm) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4______________________________________
TABLE 37 gives Monsanto rheometer torque data obtained at 140.degree. C. with a total cure time of 8 hours that show that antireversion effects are also obtained under these conditions with the BCI's.
TABLE 37______________________________________ torque (dNm)Compound T.sub.i T.sub.f *______________________________________Control 17.5 13.4BCI-MX 17.2 18.3BCI-MP 17.3 18.0BCI-DPM 17.4 18.2______________________________________ *Final torque after 8 hours, 140.degree. C.
TABLES 38 and 39 show improvement of the following properties of vulcanisates after overcure at 150.degree. C. for 60 minutes and especially at 170.degree. C. for 30 minutes: hardness, tensile strength, modulus, abrasion, compression set, tear strength, and both permanent set and heat build up.
TABLE 38______________________________________Physical and mechanical properties of the vulcanizates cured at150.degree. C./t.sub.90 and 150.degree. C./60 min. (betweenparanthesis): 01 02 04 05Compound control BCI-MP BCI-DPM BCI-MX______________________________________Hardness IRHD 70 71 74 71 (67) (72) (72) (70)Tensile strength MPa 25.5 25.4 24.9 26.3 (21.9) (22.8) (22.9) (23.0)Modulus 50% MPa 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 (1.1) (1.3) (1.3) (1.3)Modulus 100% MPa 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.3 (1.9) (2.4) (2.2) (2.1)Modulus 300% MPa 12.5 12.0 11.3 12.4 (10.5) (12.5) (11.2) (11.2)Abrasion mm.sup.3 93 86 117 96 (128) (76) (78) (75)Tear strength kN/m 115 106 114 113 (88) (92) (87) (80)Permanent set % 13.1 10.6 12.5 9.4 (13.9) (5.3) (8.0) (9.9)Heat build up .degree.C. +40 +29 +33 +27 (+47) (+27) (+31) (+35)______________________________________
TABLE 39______________________________________Physical and mechanical properties of the vulcanizates cured at170.degree. C./t.sub.90. 01 02 04 05Compound control BCI-MP BCI-DPM BCI-MX______________________________________Hardness IRHD 69 69 72 69 (63) (70) (69) (68)Rebound % 34 33 31 33 (31) (32) (32) (31)Tensile strength MPa 25.1 24.5 24.0 23.8 (16.8) (20.9) (20.8) (19.7)Modulus 50% MPa 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 (1.0) (1.3) (1.2) (1.2)Modulus 100% MPa 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 (1.5) (2.1) (2.0) (2.0)Modulus 300% MPa 11.2 10.8 10.7 11.0 (7.6) (10.7) (9.8) (10.2)Abrasion mm.sup.3 83 86 93 92 (126) (113) (100) (90)Tear strength kN/m 105 104 102 110 (43) (68) (70) (67)FTFT kcycl 45.2 46.2 44.0 47.7 (47.9) (39.2) (41.9) (38.5)Permanent set % 14.0 15.7 14.6 12.4 (17.9) (5.4) (8.7) (7.1)Heat build up .degree.C. +39 +36 +35 +30 (+58) (+29) (+35) (+31)Compression set 11 12 14 14(72 h., 23.degree. C.) (18) (15) (16) (15)______________________________________ +The data in the parentheses are the values obtained for the vulcanizates cured at 170.degree. C./30 minutes.
The compound containing 1 phr BCI-MX (and control without BCI) vulcanized at 170.degree. C. for 30 min was subjected to a blow out test in the Goodrich flexometer.
TABLE 40______________________________________Blow out test results. Blow out time Temp. rise (hrs) (.degree.C.)______________________________________Control 1.5 +92BCI-MX >10 +43______________________________________
The results show that the blow out time is substantially lengthened and the heat build up and temperature rise are substantially lowered by BCI-MX.
Example 47
1,10-Bis(4-citraconimidobenzoyloxy)decane (BCI-BAE10), Tris(6-citraconimidohexyl )isocyanurate (TCI-AA33) and 1,8-bis(citraconimido)-4-citraconimidomethyloctane (TCI--C6v) were compounded in an NR recipe (see Example 44) and their effects on the Monsanto rheometer cure curves at 170 or 180.degree. C. up to 30 min determined (Table 41):
TABLE 41______________________________________Coagent BCI-BAE10 TCI-AA33 TCI-C9V______________________________________Concentration (phr) 3.0 1.0 1.0Test temperature (.degree.C.) 180 170 170Scorch safety, t.sub.S 2 0.8 1.0 0.9(min) (0.7) (1.1) (0.9)Optimal cure time, 1.7 3.1 2.9t.sub.90 (min) (1.7) (3.2) (2.9)Torque retention after 109 86 9130 min (%) (68) (73) (73)______________________________________ Monsanto rheometer MDR 2000E; Values between parenthesis: control without BCI or TCI
BCI-BAE10, TCI-AA33 and TCI--C9V had slight or no effect on scorch and cure time, but improved reversion resistance of the compound.
Example 48
NR compound vulcanized with higher amount of sulfur
A black-filled NR compound (NR SMR CV 100, Carbon black N-326 55, Stearic acid 0.5,ZnO 8, Permanax 6PPD.RTM.2, Dutrex 729 HP.RTM.3, Crystex OT 20.RTM. 5, Perkacit CBS.RTM. 0.7 phr) containing a high amount of (insoluble) sulfur, useful as steel cord skim stock in tire compounding (M. Piertoh and R. Schubart, Kautsch.+Gummi, Kunstst. 43, 385, 1990), was compounded with 1.0 phr BCI-MP or BCI-MX.
The BCI's had practically no influence on cure characteristics at 170.degree. C. (Table 42):
TABLE 42______________________________________Cure characteristics at 170.degree. C.Compound 1 2 3______________________________________Coagent -- BCI-MP BCI-MXScorch safety, t.sub.S 2 (min) 0.7 0.7 0.7Cure time, t.sub.90 (min) 2.6 2.8 2.7Delta torque (Nm) 1.8 1.8 1.9______________________________________
Compounds containing BCI-MP and BCI-MX showed improved mechanical properties after overcure at 170.degree. C. for 30 min as compared to the control without BCI: improved hardness, modulus, tear strength (Table 43):
TABLE 43______________________________________Mechanical properties after cure at 170.degree. C., t.sub.90 and170.degree. C.,30 min (between parenthesis)Compound 1 2 3______________________________________Coagent -- BCI-MP BCI-MXHardness, Shore A 59 (53) 59 (58) 60 (57)Modulus (MPa)50% 1.5 (1.2) 1.5 (1.6) 1.5 (1.7)100% 2.7 (1.8) 2.7 (2.6) 2.7 (2.8)300% 11.6 (7.9 10.7) 11.8 (12.1)Tear strength, KN/m 107 (35) 115 (42) 103 (42)______________________________________
Example 49
The contribution of different coagents to the cross-inking reaction of a conventionally cured carbon-black filled NR compound (see Example 44) was tested at 150.degree. C. to 180.degree. C. up to optimum cure. Table 44 shows the cross-linking reaction of BCI--C6, HVA-2.RTM. and BCI-MP, expressed as the percentage change in torque at optimum cure per mmole coagent.
TABLE 44______________________________________Crosslinking reaction of coagents* torque torque change at change at Concn. Temp. t.sub.90 t.sub.90Coagent (phr) .degree.C. % %/mmole______________________________________BCI-C6 1.5 150 -3.0 -0.6 180 -3.0 -0.6HVA-2 .RTM. 1.5 170 +13.2 +2.4 5.0 170 +112 +6.0 10 170 +249 +6.7BCI-MP 1.5 170 -4.0 -0.8 5.0 170 -1.3 -0.1 10 170 -3.3 -0.1______________________________________ *Monsanto rheometer MDR 2000E.
Both BCI--C6 and BCI-MP exerted no cross-linking reaction in the conventionally cured carbon-black filled NR compound as measured by torque change at optimum cure, whereas the bismaleimide and HVA-2.RTM. exerted a substantial cross-linking reaction.

Number	Name	Date
3297713	Ladd	Jan 1967
3974163	Coran et al.	Aug 1976
4323662	Oba et al.	Apr 1982

Number	Date	Country
0738500	Jul 1966	CAX
0345825	Dec 1985	EPX
0191931	Aug 1986	EPX
0410152	Jan 1991	EPX
1257913	Apr 1960	FRX
61-014238	Jan 1986	JPX
63-312332	Dec 1988	JPX

Anti-reversion coagents for rubber vulcanization

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (1)

PCT Information

US Referenced Citations (3)

Foreign Referenced Citations (7)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)