The present invention relates solely to the field of mail processing, and it is concerned more particularly with a device for preventing the skewing of mail items during their introduction into a mail processing machine.
Conventionally, the anti-skew (or anti-slant) function is performed by the mail-item jogging device which acts directly on the lateral positioning of the mail items. However, this function is ensured efficiently only if the jogged mail items are of the same dimension. To be precise, as regards mail of different dimensions (bulk mail), this jogging is carried out on the mail items having the largest dimensions. This then results, for the articles having smaller dimensions, in the possibility of appreciable skewing.
The object of the present invention is, therefore, to mitigate this disadvantage by means of a device making it possible to prevent this skewing, particularly during the feeding of bulk mail items. One purpose of the invention is also to provide a device easily adaptable to the various formats of mail items which arise due to separate postal standards, without any special modification to its structure. Another purpose of the invention is to provide a device of which the integration into the traditional mail processing machine is easy to implement, without the need to redefine the general architecture of this machine.
These purposes are achieved by means of an anti-skew device for a mail processing machine comprising a reception plate for receiving, in the form of a stack of items, the mail items to be printed, a jogging means for jogging this stack of items against a reference wall, a selection means for extracting the mail items to be printed from this stack of items one by one, and a printing means for printing a postal stamp on the selected mail item, characterized in that it comprises a plurality of retractable members which are each positioned at a defined distance from the said reference wall and a first end of which extends through an orifice made in the said reception plate in order to form, above the said plate, a removable lateral obstacle for the mail items.
Thus, by means of this simple structure, as it were a dynamic jogging of each mail item is carried out, and the latter can then be presented in an optimum way to the selection machines of the mail processing machine. The defined distances each correspond to a width of envelope of different format. Preferably, the said first end has a triangular shape. The number of orifices made in the reception plate may be greater than the number of retractable members.
According to a preferred embodiment, the anti-skew device for a mail processing machine according to the invention comprises retractable members consisting of at least two pivoting levers. The pivoting levers are articulated on a common shaft secured to a frame of the mail processing machine by means of a supporting bar, and each of the said pivoting levers comprises a second end connected to an elastic element secured to this supporting bar.
The invention will be understood more clearly from the following detailed description accompanied by illustrative and non-limiting examples with reference to the following figures in which:
A traditional mail processing machine is illustrated in
When the mail items are of the same dimensions, more specifically of the same width, the lateral jogging means ensure that these mail items always have a correct positioning on the selection means, that is to say with a position of the front of each mail item perpendicular with respect to the reference wall. By contrast, it is easily understood that, if a mail item 24 has a lesser width than that of the other jogged items 26, the position of its front may be at an angle α with respect to the perpendicular to this wall, so that its selection is carried out crookedly and the following printing may then be seriously impaired.
According to the invention, and as illustrated in
As shown clearly in
Thus, by means of the present invention, the mail items stored in bulk on the reception plate 12, for example those designated by 40, 42 and 44 in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3356364 | Grigereit et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
4638989 | Senoo | Jan 1987 | A |
5080345 | Daniels | Jan 1992 | A |
5316288 | Fish et al. | May 1994 | A |
6523822 | Galtier et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 590 285 | Aug 1993 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060033260 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |