Not Applicable
Not Applicable
1. Observed Problem
The general purpose of a shoelace is to secure a shoe to a foot without negatively impacting the fashionable look of the shoe while it is worn. Over the years, many shoelaces have been provided in an attempt to improve the utility of the shoelace and its fashionable impact. As a result, shoelaces today come in many different shapes, colors, and lengths and can be constructed of many different types of materials with specific properties.
When a person laces a shoe an effort is made to keep the lace balanced equally between the right and left sides of the shoe's lacing flaps so that the two separate ends of the lace that will be used for tying the lace in a knot will each extend an equal distance beyond the top eyelets of the shoe's lacing flaps. A person achieves this equal balance by continually comparing the lengths of the two separate ends after the lace is passed through each pair of lacing eyelets during the lacing process. If there is an imbalance in length between the two separate ends, the person will usually adjust the lace so that balance is restored between the right and left sides before passing the lace through the next pair of eyelets. This process of lacing, comparing, re-balancing, lacing, comparing, re-balancing continues until the shoe is completely laced. Alternatively if the shoe is fully laced in an unbalanced manner the person may loosen the lace on the longer side and pull it through to the shorter side, sometimes repeatedly, until the free ends of the lace are equal in length. The main purpose of this lacing process is to make sure that once the shoe is laced, the resulting tying ends will each be equal in length. By keeping the tying ends equal in length it makes them easier to tie and results in a balanced, aesthetically pleasing knot.
However, after a lace is balanced it may be compromised over time as a shoe is repeatedly put on, tied, untied, and taken off. The process of putting on or taking off the shoe requires a person to pull the sides of the shoe away from each other so the foot can fit through the shoe's opening. As a result, the shoe's two lacing flaps also spread apart, forcing the lace to slip and become unbalanced. The slippage causes one tying end to become shorter and the other end to become longer. This imbalance will increase each time a shoe is put on or taken off until one of the tying ends becomes too short to be used to tie a secure knot. When this point of extreme imbalance is reached the person will need to un-lace and then re-lace the shoe, or loosen and readjust the lace, to rebalance the two tying ends. Without re-balancing the lace as described the person will be unable to wear the shoe because they will be unable to tie a secure knot.
Thus, shoelaces have several problems, one of which is the time consuming process required to initially lace a shoe. A second problem arises over an extended period of time where the lace becomes unbalanced, eventually requiring a person to un-lace and then re-lace their shoe, or otherwise rebalance the lace.
2. Prior Art
One prior-art shoelace is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,477,151 to Stapleton (1944). Stapleton's shoelace is a long, flat first member with a second member woven through the first member to make the knot more secure and less likely to come untied. Stapleton states that the materials and manner of construction enable a better knot to be tied while still enabling the lace to pass through the eyelets. Stapleton's lace is designed so that its whole length can pass through the eyelets of a shoe, which means it will suffer from the slippage discussed earlier.
A second prior-art shoelace is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,513,210 B1 to Gonzalez (2003). Gonzalez shows a cord which may be used as a shoelace; the cord is constructed with a core of elastic material housed within a flexible sheath so that it “can be used to fasten, tie or adjust an object while requiring no knot or mechanical device to prevent unfastening or slippage in the cording”. It achieves these results because the elastic core, when not being stretched by force, bunches up and forms bulges too large to fit through an eyelet at specific points along the cord's length. When the cord is stretched the bulges disappear and the cord is able to pass through the eyelets of a lacing system. It is apparent then that a person using Gonzalez's cord to lace a shoe will experience the same, or potentially longer, process of balancing the cord within the lacing system as any other shoelace. The process might be longer because the person will now need to stretch and release the cord repeatedly to get the bulges placed appropriately in relation to the eyelets so that the shoe is sufficiently secure on the foot. Lastly, when the cord is used as intended, the bulges sit on top of the eyelets on the outside surface of the lacing system in plain sight. These bulges are unattractive and negatively impact the traditional style of a dress shoe.
A third lace is shown in U.S. Published patent application Ser. No. 11/329,311 of Kraft (2006). Kraft introduces a shoelace with the usual two aglets at the respective ends of the lace and a third aglet positioned near the center of the lace; this third aglet may be used as a centering device. However, Kraft's third aglet is the same size as the aglets at the ends of the lace and thus is able to pass through the lacing eyelets. This makes Kraft's third aglet solely a visual guide for centering and not a physical barrier that guarantees a centered shoelace. As such, Kraft's shoelace fails to prevent a shoelace from slipping and does not make the lacing process simpler.
Accordingly various advantages of one or more aspects is the provision of an anti-slip lace that does not have to be un-laced and then re-laced, or otherwise adjusted, as the tying ends cannot become unequal over time. To provide a lace that does not have ends that the user needs to compare and re-balance while lacing a shoe, to enable a shoe to be laced faster and simpler and yet always results in equal tying ends. To provide a lace which is automatically balanced yet the classic look of a dress shoe is not compromised, and to provide a lace that makes it easy for the visually impaired or blind population to lace a shoe as it will always result in a properly laced shoe with equal tying ends.
In accordance with one embodiment an anti-slip lace comprises a lace having a pair of protuberances of a size larger than the opening of a lacing eyelet, each protuberance permanently attached to said lace. Each protuberance is disposed on one side of the midpoint of the lace so a first protuberance is a specific distance to the right of said midpoint and a second protuberance is disposed a specific distance to the left of the midpoint. Thus the lace will be easier to lace symmetrically into an item and the tying ends of the lace will always be equal in length.
A perspective view of this particular shape is shown in
In
Protuberance 21F in
Even though several examples have been shown, many other shapes are possible; the only requirements are that each protuberance must be of sufficient size so that it cannot fit through a lacing eyelet, and it must not create a visible bulge when positioned under a lacing flap. For example, if the eyelets have a diameter of ⅛ inch, the protuberances are required to have a diameter or width greater than ⅛ inch. In this example, the measurements used are exemplary and other sizes can be used.
On a lace intended to be used with an inside-to-outside lacing method, the protuberances should be positioned so that the distance between protuberances' outside edges is slightly less than the distance between lacing eyelets while keeping the midpoint of the lace centered between the first set of lacing eyelets. As an example, if the eyelets are spaced 1 inch apart, the protuberances would each be fixed at a point on the lace less than a ½ inch from the midpoint of the lace. Alternatively, on a lace intended to be used with an outside-to-inside lacing method, the protuberances should be positioned so that the distance between protuberances' inside edges is slightly greater than the distance between lacing eyelets while keeping the midpoint of the lace centered between the first set of lacing eyelets. As an example, if the eyelets are spaced 1 inch apart, the protuberances would each be fixed at a point on the lace greater than a ½ inch from the midpoint of the lace. In these examples, the measurements used are exemplary and other sizes can be used.
Protuberances 21 are used to make the time-consuming task of measuring and equalizing the length of lace 15 after it passes through each pair of eyelets 25 when lacing a shoe unnecessary. As shown in
Thus it has been shown that my non-slip lace provides a simple solution to the problems of uneven tying ends. While historically a person needed to un-lace and then re-lace their shoe or loosen and adjust the lace to solve this problem, my improved lace makes this process unnecessary.
Additionally, the lace makes lacing a shoe quicker and simpler. A user will appreciate that protuberances 21 make the task of measuring and equalizing the length of lace 15 after threading it through each pair of lacing eyelets 25 unnecessary because the protuberances equally divide the lace into fixed and equal lengths between the left side and the right side. Those lengths are equal to the distance between protuberance 21 and tying end 17 on one side and protuberance 21 and tying end 18 on the other side so that the tying ends can never be of differing lengths.
The lace is able to achieve these results without impacting the traditional look of a dress shoe as protuberances 21 are hidden under flaps 31 of the shoe's lacing system 30.
Although the non-slip laces of the present application have been described with reference to specific embodiments of its parts, materials, fabrication and elements, the specific construction and arrangements have been given only as examples and many modifications and changes are possible. For instance, the laces may be round, flat, square, triangular, oval or any other shape and be of any width. The shape of the protuberances can be circular like a collar, round like a bead, rectangular like a cross-member, thin and straight like a shaft, triangular, oval, pentagonal, hexagonal, flat, or any other shape. Additionally, the shape of the protuberances may be either symmetrical or asymmetrical. Furthermore, while the laces have been described for use on a shoe it should be understood that the laces may be used with any type of footwear, clothing, or other item that is laced, including sneakers, running or athletic shoes, boat shoes, moccasins, boots, corsets, waist gathering laces for jackets or parkas, and nautical items. And while an inside-to-outside lacing method has been used graphically in
This application claims priority of Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/334,495, filed May 13, 2010, Inventor John A. Ward, Title: “Anti-Slip Shoelace”
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61334495 | May 2010 | US |