Anti-theft security marker with soft magnetic bias component

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20070290857
  • Publication Number
    20070290857
  • Date Filed
    November 20, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Published
    December 20, 2007
    17 years ago
Abstract
An acoustic-magneto (AM) anti-theft marker is formed with the bias piece made from a soft magnetic material, instead of a “semi-hard” magnetic material that has been used in conventional anti-theft AM security markers. The method of manufacturing such soft magnetic bias pieces includes cold deforming a soft magnetic material with at least an eighty percent reduction rate, while keeping its DC coercivity below 12.5 Oe. The strip or wire of soft magnetic material is then cut to size as required for the bias piece. The anti-theft AM security marker has the soft magnetic bias piece placed inside or outside of the resonating cavity of the housing for the security tag with the resonator pieces inside the resonating cavity with a cover film placed over the housing. The soft magnetic bias piece or pieces effectively operate close to resonator piece or pieces with or without a non-magnetic separating film.
Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The advantages of this invention will become apparent upon consideration of the following detailed disclosure of the invention, especially when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 is a table showing a computerized recorded AC measurement data on a bias component made with a 49Ni—Fe soft magnetic material.



FIG. 1A is a graph depicting the AC coercivity of a 49Ni—Fe soft magnetic bias strip increases as the frequency increases;



FIG. 2 is a typical frequency spectrum from a Fe40Ni38Mo4B18 amorphous resonator piece biased by a 49Ni—Fe soft magnetic bias piece;



FIG. 3 is an exploded view of a prior art AM security label using a semi-hard magnetic bias piece;



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the prior art anti-theft AM security label depicted in FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 is an exploded schematic view of a first embodiment of an AM anti-theft security tag incorporating the principles of the instant invention;



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of the anti-theft security tag shown in FIG. 5;



FIG. 7 is an exploded view of an alternative embodiment of an anti-theft security tag incorporating the principles of the instant invention;



FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of the security tag depicted in FIG. 7;



FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of a second alternative embodiment of the instant invention;



FIG. 10 is an exploded view of a third alternative embodiment of an anti-theft security tag incorporating the principles of the instant invention;



FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view of the security tag depicted in FIG. 10;



FIG. 12 is an exploded view of a fourth alternative embodiment of an anti-theft security tag incorporating the principles of the instant invention;



FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of the security tag depicted in FIG. 12; and



FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a fifth alternative embodiment of an anti-theft security tag incorporating the principles of the instant invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring to FIGS. 3 and 4, an acoustic-magneto (AM) anti-theft security tag manufactured according to the known prior art technology can be seen. The anti-theft security tag 10 includes a housing 12 defining a resonating cavity 13 in which resonator pieces 14 are placed. A cover film 16 closes the resonating cavity 13 with the resonator pieces 14 position within. The semi-hard magnetic bias piece 15 is positioned outside of the resonating cavity 13 between the cover film 16 and the cover 17 trapping the semi-hard magnetic bias piece 15 between the cover 17 and the intermediate cover film 16. When activated, the semi-hard magnetic bias piece 15 causes the resonator 14 to resonate mechanically at a frequency within the range of the detection apparatus (not shown). Demagnetizing the semi-hard bias piece 15 causes the resonation of the resonator piece 14 to shift outside the frequency range of the field applied by the detection apparatus, which can accomplish deactivation of the AM security tag 10. Once deactivated, the security tag 10 can pass through the interrogation field applied by the detection apparatus (not shown) without raising the alarm. The operation of the AM anti-theft marker is well known to one of ordinary skill in the art and a more detailed explanation is not necessary.


Conventional practice utilizes semi-hard magnetic material as the bias piece in the disposable labels so that the bias material will not be deactivated in the standard detection apparatus. By setting a minimum DC coercivity, and, therefore, using semi-hard magnetic material in the formation of the semi-hard magnetic bias piece 15, the bias material would not be in danger of becoming demagnetized by the interrogation field of the detection apparatus. The concern was that the interrogation field could have a peak as high as 12.5 Oe in a real security label detection system. As is noted in greater detail below, the 58Hz AC coercivity is the final important property to see if the bias material can be stable or not in the interrogation field, not DC coercivity as referred in all prior arts documents relating to this subject.


Semi-hard magnetic material is manufactured by carefully controlled manufacturing parameters to provide a material having consistent DC Hc and DC Br properties. The material must be heat treated within very strict temperature controls to provide satisfactorily operable material for the bias pieces. As a matter of fact, most final heat treatments to form a semi-hard magnetic material for use as a bias material in prior AM labels are irreversible. Namely, it is a “hit or miss” process with great risk involved. If a final heat treatment cannot reach a targeted combination of DC Hc and DC Br to provide a good bias function for prior AM labels, the strip will no longer be salvageable by any other means. Consequently, a failed final heat treatment will result in scraping the entire lot being processes at final thin gauge after enormous process from melting. In contrast, the soft magnetic bias material can be manufactured very easily. For example, by using Fe-based or Ni-based cold rolled strip or wire with big cold reduction (e.g. >90%) without heat treatment needed, we will get high consistency properties from lot-to-lot in the manufacturing process. No uncertainty to produce every qualified lot of this bias material. More particular examples are: a Fe—Ni alloy (the commercial example is 49Ni—Fe) strip material, as well as low carbon Fe strip, is widely used as soft magnetic strips. These alloys have single phase and easy cold formability.


Although they have never been considered for using as AM label's bias material, these soft magnetic alloys are widely available materials with manufacturing experience spanning several decades and were available long before the existence of the semi-hard bias materials as well as the AM labels. In contrast, current semi-hard bias materials always are patented special material compositions with complicated processes. The as-rolled DC coercivity and DC remenance of soft magnetic alloys become insensitive to the process parameters and become uniformly consistent after a heavy cold reduction such as >90%. No further heat treatment is needed after cold rolling the material at finished thickness for use as bias material for AM labels. The homogenity of the whole batch, as well as the batch to batch consistency is superior, compared to the semi-hard magnetic materials that go through various low temperature heat treatments under controlled atmospheres with difficult handling on annealed thin gage strip.


The reduced DC Hc of soft magnetic bias materials enables a significantly longer deactivation distance. Unlike the detection system operated at high frequency at 58 kHz, the AC deactivation field frequency can be designed as low as power line frequency such as 50-60 Hz. In such low frequency, the eddy current is low and the material has AC coercivity close to DC coercivity, which is at about or below 12.5 Oe. Therefore, the lower deactivation peak field at 12.5 Oe is enough to deactivate the soft magnetic bias material, while semi-hard bias material cannot be deactivated with DC Hc greater than 20 Oe at same distance.


The lower DC coercivity of the soft magnetic bias piece 25 provides just enough bias field without excess magnetic force to clamp the flat resonator piece 24. Prior AM security label 10 incorporated many measures to reduce such clamping effect: such as making resonator piece 14 with a transversely curled shape, as depicted in FIG. 3, and/or increasing the thickness of the cover film 16 to create enough distance between the semi-hard magnetic bias piece 15 and the curled resonator piece 14 to reduce attraction force therefore to prevent clamping. The transverse curled resonant strip 14 is not as good as a flat strip configuration 24 in keeping the stability on resonant frequency.


The magnetically softer bias material has much less or nearly zero “clamping” effect on the resonator pieces compared to a same size (e.g. 0.05 mm thick) semi-hard magnetic material. Therefore, the resonator pieces 24 can be flat instead of being curled shape resonator piece 14 across width. The fact that 49Ni—Fe soft magnetic material can be used in AM label also overthrow the conventional notion that the bias material has to be high in DC Br in order to get enough flux level at thin gage such as 0.05 mm. All known prior semi-hard materials have a higher DC Hc (>12.5 Oe) as well as high DC Br (e.g. about 12-18 kGs). In contrast, our one specific example showing that the 49Ni—Fe soft magnetic bias piece with its DC Br is less than 7 kOs but showing acceptable bias function, when the strip is same thin thickness of 0.05 mm, to make an active and detectable AM label in commercially available Ultramax detection system. This clearly demonstrated that high DC Br is not necessary which combined with higher DC Hc could cause adverse “clamping” effect.


The soft magnetic bias material does not require curled resonator pieces, and operates satisfactorily with flat ones. With a bias piece formed as a flat strip, a wire or other elongated shape, the anti-theft AM security label can be manufactured thinner. Another embodiment of the bias piece would be to place multiple wires in a parallel array, for example on a piece of pressure sensitive tape or double tape. Still another embodiment of the instant invention utilizes a triangle shape bias material with acceptable performance. This embodiment can effectively reduce the half weight of the bias strip needed for the same function. This is half cost reduction for making an equivalent or better AM label. In summary, the thin soft magnetic bias piece (e.g. 0.05 mm) has nearly zero “clamping” effect. Therefore, all previously utilized complicated measures to offset “clamping” effect become unnecessary. More favorably, the soft magnetic bias piece 25 can now be placed inside the resonating cavity of the house together with the resonator pieces 24, which much simplified the label production process.


One of the major advantages of using low DC coercivity bias material is that we can use cheaper resonator material. In Anderson's '489 patent, Fe—Si—B amorphous was listed as having the highest magneto-elastic exchange factor k, which is listed as suitable for AM label application. However, the bias field needed to get the maximum coupling is lower compared to that for a cobalt-contained amorphous resonator. Prior semi-hard magnetic materials give a higher bias field that is suitable for the cobalt-contained resonators that need higher bias field to reach maximum coupling exchange. Therefore, the semi-hard bias materials are not suitable for Fe—Si—B resonator that needs much lower bias field. Now, the soft magnetic bias materials, with its lower bias field, make it possible to use much cheaper Fe—Si—B amorphous as the resonator material.


One example to manufacture soft magnetic bias pieces, start with a coil of 100 mm wide, 0.5 mm thick 49Ni—Fe strip, which is widely available in the marketplace, cold roll with a four-high rolling mill directly down to 0.05 mm thick with cold reduction rate greater than 80%, preferably greater than 90%, but maintaining the DC Hc still below 12.5 Oe. In our specific case, the DC Hc is about 8.5 Oe for 49Ni—Fe soft magnetic bias material as manufactured. The coil is then slit into strips about 7 mm wide, which are then cut into 32-35 mm long pieces with a high speed shear utilizing an automatic feeder. The soft magnetic bias pieces do not need any heat treatments at 0.05 mm final thickness.



FIG. 1 and FIG. 1A are the table and graph of the data to show that the AC Hc of a soft magnetic bias piece formed as described above, FIG. 1A being the graphic form of the data expressed in FIG. 1. The AC Hc is significantly higher than DC Hc. At 58 kHz, the AC Hc is typically at least 60% higher than the DC Hc, reached 13-16 Oe, although the DC Hc is below 8.5 Oe, which prevents AM labels formed with soft magnetic bias pieces from being deactivated by the 58 kHz reversal pulse field in high frequency detection systems. The DC Hc and DC Br from the bias strip made as described above are very consistent, thus enabling AM labels to be manufactured with consistent quality.



FIG. 2 shows a typical frequency spectrum from the Fe40Ni38Mo4B18 amorphous resonator piece (such as is disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,510,489), biased by a 32×7×0.05 mm 49Ni—Fe soft magnetic bias piece. The graph shows the resonant and anti-resonant peaks, indicating that the AM anti-theft label manufactured with a soft magnetic material bias piece can have resonant frequency being controlled around 58 kHz.


As a test of the soft magnetic biased AM security labels, a narrow deactivator commercially available from SEC under the name of“Scanmax Slim-Pad Pro” was employed by placing activated AM labels with the elongated direction thereof oriented parallel to the surface of the deactivator at various distances from the deactivator, as listed in Table I below. The deactivator was triggered with a permanent AM security tag to release the AC demagnetization field. The exposed soft magnetic biased AM security labels were then checked with a label detector (commercially available under the name of “Double Checker” made by SEC) to check the deactivation performance. The test was duplicated using semi-hard magnetic biased security labels (DR labels) commercially available from SEC for comparison purpose.


As is reflected in Table I below, the soft magnetic biased AM security labels incorporating the principles of the instant invention demonstrated significantly better deactivation performance when compared to the presently commercially available semi-hard magnetic biased AM security labels. The soft magnetic biased AM security labels increased effective deactivation distance to 24 cm compared to the corresponding distance of 15 cm for the semi-hard magnetic biased AM security labels. The instant invention greatly enhances the deactivation reliability to big articles or whole box of articles attached with AM labels (i.e. “source tagging”).









TABLE I







Deactivation performance comparison of DR security


labels (with semi-hard magnetic bias piece) and


security labels incorporating the instant invention (with


soft magnetic bias piece, used 49Ni—Fe in this example)


exposed to the same deactivation field.









AM labels









Exposure distance from the
Semi-Hard



surface of the deactivator
Magnetic biased
Soft Magnetic biased





15 cm
Fully deactivated
Fully deactivated


16 cm
Partially deactivated
Fully deactivated


17 cm
Failed deactivation
Fully deactivated


18 cm
Failed deactivation
Fully deactivated


19 cm
Failed deactivation
Fully deactivated


20 cm
Failed deactivation
Fully deactivated


21 cm
Failed deactivation
Fully deactivated


22 cm
Failed deactivation
Fully deactivated


24 cm
Failed deactivation
Fully deactivated


25 cm
Failed deactivation
Partially deactivated


26 cm
Failed deactivation
Failed deactivation





Deactivator: SEC's “Scanmax Slim Pad Pro”


Label detector: SEC's Double Checker


DR Label: Semi-hard bias piece + two FeNiCoSiB resonators


Soft Magnetic biased Label: 49Ni—Fe bias piece + two FeNiMoB resonators


Fully deactivated: no alarm at Double Checker's surface


Partially deactivated: alarm at 1–10 cm away from Double Checker's surface


Failed deactivation: alarm at >20 cm away from Double Checker's surface






Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6, an AM security label 20 incorporating the principles of the instant invention can best be seen. The security label 20 includes a housing 22 defining a resonating cavity 23 in which is placed the soft magnetic bias piece 25 and a pair of resonator pieces 24. The housing 22 is preferably thermal-formed from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) material having a thickness of 0.3 mm, although other known packaging films commonly used for medicines or foods could be utilized. The shape of the resonating cavity 23 is preferably rectangular. Similarly, the soft magnetic bias piece 25 is a flat rectangular member preferably formed from a 49Ni—Fe strip. The two resonator pieces 24 are preferably placed above the soft magnetic bias piece 25 and are also preferably formed in a flat rectangular configuration to fit within the resonating cavity 23. The area of the soft magnetic bias piece 25 should be smaller than the resonating cavity 23 in order to provide enough space for the resonator pieces 24 to resonate. The resonating cavity 23 is closed by applying a cover 27, preferably formed from double side tape with liner placed on a rectangular shaped cover film affixed to the top of the housing 22.


Table II below shows the effect of different locations of the soft magnetic bias piece 25 on the detection performance of the AM security labels 20. Samples A and B of the soft magnetic biased security label, incorporating a 49Ni—Fe 32×7×0.05 mm bias piece 25 placed inside the resonating cavity 23 of the housing 22 with a resonator piece formed of FeNiMoB amorphous strip, were tested using a commercially available label detector (Double Checker manufactured by SEC) to determine the detection distance. The results of this test show that the exact position of soft magnetic bias piece 25 inside the resonating cavity 23 does not affect the label detection performance significantly. Accordingly, a significant advantage of the instant invention is that no specific requirement for the exact position of the soft magnetic bias piece 25 is mandated. As a result, production and equipment costs can be substantially reduced.









TABLE II







Effect of different positions of the soft magnetic bias


piece (49Ni—Fe 32 × 7 × 0.05 mm) within


the resonating cavity with respect to the detection


performance of the soft magnetic biased AM security


labels.








Position of



the soft


magnetic bias
The longest distance that an active soft magnetic


piece inside
security label can be detected by a double checker (cm):









the resonating
Soft Magnetic Label A
Soft Magnetic Label B











cavity
Direction 1
Direction 2
Direction 1
Direction 2





left side
22
23
20
26


middle
21
23
22
23


right side
19
22
22
23





Note:


(1) Direction 1 is with the long axis of the security label perpendicular to the double checker's surface.


(2) Direction 2 is reversal to direction 1


(3) Additional earth field bias effect in various directions caused slight variations in detection distances.






Referring now to FIGS. 7 and 8, the soft magnetic biased AM security label 20 is formed substantially like the prior art AM security label 10 in FIGS. 3 and 4. The housing 22 defines the resonating cavity 23 in which the resonating pieces 24 are positioned. An intermediate cover film 26 seals off the resonating cavity 23. The soft magnetic bias piece 25 is placed on top of the intermediate cover film 26 and then covered with a top cover 27 that is formed from a cover film and double sided tape, as described above. This configuration allows existing AM label production equipment can simply replace semi-hard bias material with soft magnetic bias material without significant investment in equipment modification.



FIG. 9 depicts a configuration of a security label 20 that is similar in structure to the embodiment depicted in FIGS. 5 and 6, but with the soft magnetic bias piece 25 placed on top of the resonator pieces 24. FIGS. 10 and 11 depict yet a different configuration, though also similar to the structure of FIGS. 5 and 6, but utilizing only a single resonator piece 24, instead of two resonator pieces 24 as is conventional with AM security labels for lower cost and easier manufacturing. FIGS. 12 and 13 depict yet another configuration in which two bias pieces, though more than two bias pieces can be used, with one bias piece 25 being located below the resonator piece 24 in the resonating cavity 23 and the other bias piece 25 being located above the intermediate cover film 26. FIG. 14 depicts yet a different configuration of a security label 20 that is similar in structure to the embodiments shown in FIGS. 5, 6 and 9, but placing a single flat soft magnetic bias piece 25 sandwiched between two resonator pieces 24, housed within the resonating cavity without fixing the position of the bias piece 25.


The utilization of the soft magnetic bias piece in an AM security label enables the configuration of the housing 22, and arrangement of the soft magnetic bias piece 25 and the resonator piece(s) 24 within and outside the resonating cavity, as are described above with respect to FIGS. 5-11, to be placed in these different configurations without disruption of the effectiveness of the security label 20 in the active mode, or to be deactivated. A substantial advantage of the instant application is the reduction of the clamping effect, described above, which allows the reconfiguration of the resonator 24 and bias pieces 25 to correspond to the manufacturing machinery and process methods readily available to the manufacturer of the security tags 20, and allows the resonator pieces 24 to be manufactured in a flat rectangular configuration, rather than the transversely curved shape conventional with semi-hard magnetic biased anti-theft AM security tags.


It will be understood that changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangements of parts which have been described and illustrated to explain the nature of the invention will occur to and may be made by those skilled in the art upon a reading of this disclosure within the principles and scope of the invention. The foregoing description illustrates the preferred embodiment of the invention; however, concepts, as based upon the description, may be employed in other embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An acoustic-magneto security label comprising: a housing defining a resonating cavity;a resonator piece positioned within said resonating cavity;a soft magnetic bias piece supported on said housing proximate to said resonator piece; anda top cover affixed to said housing to seal said soft magnetic bias piece and said resonator piece within said housing.
  • 2. The security label of claim 1 wherein both said resonator piece and said soft magnetic bias piece are positioned within said resonating cavity.
  • 3. The security label of claim 1 further comprising an intermediate cover placed on said housing to close said resonating cavity with said resonator piece positioned therein, said soft magnetic bias piece being positioned between said intermediate cover and said top cover.
  • 4. The security label of claim 3 wherein said resonating cavity has multiple resonator pieces positioned therein.
  • 5. The security label of claim 2 wherein said resonator piece are positioned between said soft magnetic bias and said top cover.
  • 6. The security label of claim 5 wherein said resonating cavity has multiple resonator pieces positioned therein between said soft magnetic bias piece and said top cover.
  • 7. The security label of claim 1 wherein said soft magnetic bias piece has a direct current coercivity value below 10.0 Oe.
  • 8. The security label of claim 7 wherein said soft magnetic bias piece is formed in a flat configuration from a cold rolled strip of material having a cold reduction rate of at least 80 percent.
  • 9. In an acoustic-magneto security tag having a housing defining a resonating cavity in which is positioned a resonating device and a top cover closing said resonating cavity, the improvement comprising: at least one magnetic bias piece formed of soft magnetic material having a direct current coercivity below 12.5 Oe.
  • 10. The security tag of claim 9 wherein said magnetic bias piece has a simple metallurgical uniform single phase structure without multiple phase structures.
  • 11. The security tag of claim 10 wherein both said resonating device and said at least one soft magnetic bias piece are positioned within said resonating cavity.
  • 12. The security tag of claim 11 wherein said resonating device is positioned between said at least one soft magnetic bias piece and said top cover.
  • 13. The security tag of claim 12 wherein said resonating device is formed of at least one resonator piece positioned within said resonating cavity between said at least one soft magnetic bias piece and said top cover.
  • 14. The security tag of claim 12 wherein said resonating device is formed of multiple resonator pieces positioned within said resonating cavity between said at least one soft magnetic bias piece and said top cover.
  • 15. The security tag of claim 14 wherein each said resonator piece is formed in a flat configuration.
  • 16. The security tag of claim 10 further comprising an intermediate cover placed on said housing to separate said resonating device and said at least one soft magnetic bias piece, said at least one soft magnetic bias piece being positioned between said intermediate cover and said top cover.
  • 17. The security tag of claim 16 further comprising first and second soft magnetic bias pieces with said first soft magnetic bias piece being positioned in said resonating cavity and said second soft magnetic bias piece being position between said intermediate cover and said top cover, said resonating device being located between said first and second soft magnetic bias pieces.
  • 18. A method of manufacturing an acoustic-magneto anti-theft security label comprising the steps of: providing a housing formed with a resonating cavity;placing at least one resonator piece within said resonating cavity;positioning at least one soft magnetic bias piece proximate to said at least one resonator piece, said soft magnetic bias piece having a direct current coercivity below 12.5 Oe; andaffixing a cover on said housing to secure said at least one resonator piece and said at least one soft magnetic bias piece within said housing.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein said positioning step places said at least one soft magnetic bias piece within said resonating cavity with said at least one resonator piece.
  • 20. The method of claim 18 wherein said affixing step includes the steps of: placing an intermediate cover film over said resonating cavity to secure said at least one resonator piece within said resonating cavity; andmounting a top cover on said intermediate cover film to secure said at least one soft magnetic bias piece between said top cover and said intermediate cover film.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
200610052012.4 Jun 2006 CN national