Patent Grant
12043663
The present application is related to the following co-pending applications:
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing that has been submitted in XML format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said XML copy, created on Apr. 6, 2023, is named LNK_191 D1_ST26_SL.xml and is 87,842 bytes in size.
The present invention relates to antibody molecules and functional fragments thereof, capable of binding to tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), to processes for their production, and to their therapeutic uses.
TNFα is a homo-trimeric pro-inflammatory cytokine that is released by and interacts with cells of the immune system. TNFα has also been shown to be up-regulated in a number of human diseases, including chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.
Antibodies to TNFα have been proposed for the prophylaxis and treatment of endotoxic shock (Beutler et al., Science, 234, 470-474, 1985). Bodmer et al., (Critical Care Medicine, 21, S441-S446, 1993) and Wherry et al., (Critical Care Medicine, 21, S436-S440, 1993) discuss the therapeutic potential of anti-TNFα antibodies in the treatment of septic shock. The use of anti-TNFα antibodies in the treatment of septic shock is also discussed by Kirschenbaum et al., (Critical Care Medicine, 26, 1625-1626, 1998). Collagen-induced arthritis can be treated effectively using an anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody (Williams et al. (PNAS-USA, 89, 9784-9788, 1992)).
The use of anti-TNFα antibodies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease is discussed in Feldman et al. (Transplantation Proceedings, 30, 4126-4127, 1998), Adorini et al. (Trends in Immunology Today, 18, 209-211, 1997) and in Feldman et al. (Advances in Immunology, 64, 283-350, 1997). The antibodies to TNFα previously used in such treatments are generally chimeric antibodies, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,452.
Monoclonal antibodies against TNFα have been described in the prior art. Meager et al. (Hybridoma, 6, 305-311, 1987) describe murine monoclonal antibodies against recombinant TNFα. Fendly et al. (Hybridoma, 6, 359-370, 1987) describe the use of murine monoclonal antibodies against recombinant TNFα in defining neutralising epitopes on TNFα. Furthermore, in International Patent Application WO 92/11383, recombinant antibodies, including CDR-grafted antibodies, specific for TNFα are disclosed. Rankin et al. (British J. Rheumatology, 34, 334-342, 1995) describe the use of such CDR-grafted antibodies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,452 discloses anti-TNFα chimeric antibodies and their use in treating pathologies associated with the presence of TNFα. Further anti-TNFα antibodies are disclosed in Stephens et al. (Immunology, 85, 668-674, 1995), GB-A-2 246 570, GB-A-2 297 145, U.S. Pat. No. 8,673,310, US 2014/0193400, EP 2 390 267 B1, U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,293,235, 8,697,074, WO 2009/155723 A2 and WO 2006/131013 A2.
The prior art recombinant anti-TNFα antibody molecules generally have a reduced affinity for TNFα compared to the antibodies from which the hypervariable regions or CDRs are derived. All currently marketed inhibitors of TNFα are administered intravenously or subcutaneously in weekly or longer intervals as bolus injections, resulting in high starting concentrations that are steadily decreasing until the next injection.
Currently approved anti-TNFα biotherapeutics include (i) infliximab, a chimeric IgG anti-human monoclonal antibody (Remicade®; Wiekowski M et al: “Infliximab (Remicade)”, Handbook of Therapeutic Antibodies, WILEY-VCH; Weinheim, 2007 Jan. 1, p. 885-904); (ii) etanercept, a TNFR2 dimeric fusion protein, with an IgG1 Fc (Enbrel®); (iii) adalimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) (Humira®; Kupper H et al: “Adalimumab (Humira)”, Handbook of Therapeutic Antibodies, WILEY-VCH; Weinheim, 2007 Jan. 1, p. 697-732); (iv) certolizumab, a PEGylated Fab fragment (Cimzia®; Melmed G Y et al: “Certolizumab pegol”, Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, Nature Publishing Group, GB, Vol. 7, No. 8, 2008 Aug. 1, p. 641-642); (v) Golimumab, a human IgGIK monoclonal antibody (Simponi®; Mazumdar S et al: “Golimumab”, mAbs, Landes Bioscience, US, Vol. 1, No. 5, 2009 Sep. 1, p. 422-431). However, various biosimilars are in development, and a mimic of infliximab known as Remsima has already been approved in Europe.
Infliximab has a relatively low affinity to TNFα (KD>0.2 nM; Weir et al., 2006, Therapy 3: 535) and a limited neutralization potency in an L929 assay. In addition, infliximab shows substantially no cross-reactivity with TNFα from Cynomolgus or Rhesus monkeys. For anti-TNFα antibodies, however, cross-reactivity with TNFα from monkeys is highly desirable, as this allows for animal tests with primates, reflecting the situation in humans in many aspects.
Etanercept, although a bivalent molecule, binds TNFα at a ratio of one trimer per one etanercept molecule, precluding the formation of large antigen-biotherapeutics complexes (Wallis, 2008, Lancet Infect Dis, 8: 601). It does not inhibit LPS-induced cytokine secretion in monocytes (Kirchner et al., 2004, Cytokine, 28: 67).
The potency of adalimumab is similar to that of infliximab. Another disadvantage of adalimumab is its poor stability, e.g. as determined in a thermal unfolding test. The melting temperature (Tm) of adalimumab in such a test was determined to be 67.5° C. The lower the Tm value of an antibody, however, the lower is its general stability. A lower Tm makes antibodies less suitable for pharmaceutical use, e.g. for oral administration.
The potency of certolizumab is slightly greater than that of infliximab, but still not satisfying. Certolizumab does not inhibit T-cell proliferation in a MLR (Vos et al., 2011, Gastroenterology, 140: 221).
EP2623515 A1 discloses humanized anti-TNFα antibodies and antigen-binding fragments (Fab) thereof. As becomes clear from the disclosed examples, the potency of the resulting humanized Fab fragments is comparable to that of infliximab in a L929 neutralization assay (see Table 2 and 5). The sole anti-TNFα IgG antibody tested for cross-reactivity binds only weakly to Rhesus TNF-α (see [0069];
WO 2012/007880 A2 discloses a modified single domain antigen binding molecule (SDAB) in the form of fusion proteins comprising one or more single antigen binding domains that bind to one or more targets (e.g. TNFα), a linker and one or more polymer molecules. The only specific example given is termed SDAB-01 and includes two antigen binding domains, which bind to TNFα, connected with a flexible linker, and a C-terminal Cysteine supporting the site specific PEGylation (see
WO 2015/144852 A1 investigates the properties of an anti-TNF-α scFv designated “scFv1”. This scFv showed a TNFα neutralization capacity in a PK-15 cell assay that was comparable to that of infliximab (see [0236]). In addition, the scFv seems to have some cross-reactivity to TNF-α from rhesus macaque and cynomolgus monkey (see Ex. 8). No affinity data are reported in WO 2015/144852 A1. The single chain antibody fragment DLX105 (also known as ESBA 105), however, which is known to have only moderate affinity (KD=157 pM; see Urech et al. 2010 Ann Rheum Dis 69: 443), shows a better binding to TNF-α than scFv1 (see FIG. 1 of WO 2015/144852 A1). Therefore, WO 2015/144852 A1 does not disclose anti-TNF-α antibodies having high affinity for human TNFα (KD<125 pM).
WO 2015/065987 A1 describes anti-TNF-α antibodies, anti-IL-6 antibodies, and bispecific antibodies binding to both antigens. Certain anti-TNFα antibodies showed some cross-reactivity with TNFα from Cynomolgus (
Drugs in R&D, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2003, pages 174-178 describes the humanized antibody “Humicade” (CDP 571; BAY 103356), a monoclonal anti-TNFα antibody with high affinity. The potency of Humicade to inhibit TNFα-induced apoptosis in L929 cells, however, appears to be limited (see, e.g., US 2003/0199679 A1 at [0189]). The reference therefore does not disclose anti-TNF-α antibodies having a potency to inhibit TNFα-induced apoptosis in L929 cells greater than that of infliximab.
Saldanha J W et al: “Molecular Engineering I: Humanization”, Handbook of Therapeutic Antibodies, Chapter 6, 2007-01-01, WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, p. 119-144 discloses different strategies for humanization of monoclonal antibodies including CDR Grafting, Resurfacing/Veneering, SDR transfer and Delmmunization Technology.
There is a need for improved antibody molecules to treat chronic inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel disorders. The antibody molecules should at least have (i) high affinity for human TNFα (i.e. a KD<125 pM), (ii) a high potency to inhibit TNFα-induced apoptosis in L929 cells, (iii) a high potency to inhibit LPS-induced cytokine secretion, (iv) substantial affinity to TNFα from Cynomolgus and Rhesus (e.g. a KD<1 nM), and (v) a high melting temperature of the variable domain as determined in a thermal unfolding experiment (e.g. a Tm>70° C.).
The inventors of the present application found that certain anti-TNFα antibodies and functional fragments thereof exhibit a combination of favorable properties, including high affinity for human TNFα (KD<125 pM), a potency to inhibit TNFα-induced apoptosis in L929 cells greater than that of infliximab, a potency to inhibit LPS-induced cytokine secretion greater than that of adalimumab, and substantial affinity (KD<1 nM) to TNFα from animals such as Cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) and/or Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). In addition, the antibodies and functional fragments thereof were specific for TNFα in that they did not significantly bind to TNFβ, and exhibit a significant stability, as determined in a thermal unfolding assay of the variable domain.
The invention provides antibody molecules and functional fragments thereof.
The present invention therefore relates to the subject matter defined in the following items (1) to (48):
The present invention pertains to an antibody or a functional fragment thereof capable of binding to human TNFα.
In the context of the present application, the term “antibody” is used as a synonym for “immunoglobulin” (Ig), which is defined as a protein belonging to the class IgG, IgM, IgE, IgA, or IgD (or any subclass thereof), and includes all conventionally known antibodies and functional fragments thereof. In the context of the present invention, a “functional fragment” of an antibody/immunoglobulin is defined as antigen-binding fragment or other derivative of a parental antibody that essentially maintains one or more of the properties of such parental antibody referred to in items (1) to (30) herein above. An “antigen-binding fragment” of an antibody/immunoglobulin is defined as fragment (e.g., a variable region of an IgG) that retains the antigen-binding region. An “antigen-binding region” of an antibody typically is found in one or more hypervariable region(s) of an antibody, i.e., the CDR-1, -2, and/or -3 regions. “Antigen-binding fragments” of the invention include the domain of a F(ab′)2 fragment and a Fab fragment. “Functional fragments” of the invention include, scFv, dsFv, diabodies, triabodies, tetrabodies and Fc fusion proteins. The F(ab′)2 or Fab may be engineered to minimize or completely remove the intermolecular disulphide interactions that occur between the CH1 and CL domains. The antibodies or functional fragments of the present invention may be part of bi- or multifunctional constructs.
Preferred functional fragments in the present invention are scFv and diabodies.
An scFv is a single chain Fv fragment in which the variable light (“VL”) and variable heavy (“VH”) domains are linked by a peptide bridge.
A diabody is a dimer consisting of two fragments, each having variable regions joined together via a linker or the like (hereinafter referred to as diabody-forming fragments), and typically contain two VLs and two VHS. Diabody-forming fragments include those consisting of VL and VH, VL and VL, VH and VH, etc., preferably VH and VL. In diabody-forming fragments, the linker joining variable regions is not specifically limited, but preferably enough short to avoid noncovalent bonds between variable regions in the same fragment. The length of such a linker can be determined as appropriate by those skilled in the art, but typically 2-14 amino acids, preferably 3-9 amino acids, especially 4-6 amino acids. In this case, the VL and VH encoded on the same fragment are joined via a linker short enough to avoid noncovalent bonds between the VL and VH on the same chain and to avoid the formation of single-chain variable region fragments so that dimers with another fragment can be formed. The dimers can be formed via either covalent or noncovalent bonds or both between diabody-forming fragments.
Moreover, diabody-forming fragments can be joined via a linker or the like to form single-chain diabodies (sc(Fv)2). By joining diabody-forming fragments using a long linker of about 15-20 amino acids, noncovalent bonds can be formed between diabody-forming fragments existing on the same chain to form dimers. Based on the same principle as for preparing diabodies, polymerized antibodies such as trimers or tetramers can also be prepared by joining three or more diabody-forming fragments.
Preferably, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention specifically binds to TNFα. As used herein, an antibody or functional fragment thereof “specifically recognizes”, or “specifically binds to” human TNFα, when the antibody or functional fragment is able to discriminate between human TNFα and one or more reference molecule(s). Preferably, the IC50 value for binding to each of the reference molecules is at least 1,000 times greater than the IC50 value for binding to TNFα, particularly as described in Example 2, section 2.1.4. In its most general form (and when no defined reference is mentioned), “specific binding” is referring to the ability of the antibody or functional fragment to discriminate between human TNFα and an unrelated biomolecule, as determined, for example, in accordance with a specificity assay methods known in the art. Such methods comprise, but are not limited to, Western blots and ELISA tests. For example, a standard ELISA assay can be carried out. Typically, determination of binding specificity is performed by using not a single reference biomolecule, but a set of about three to five unrelated biomolecules, such as milk powder, BSA, transferrin or the like. In one embodiment, specific binding refers to the ability of the antibody or fragment to discriminate between human TNFα and human TNFβ.
The antibody of the invention or the functional fragment of the invention comprises a VL domain and a VH domain. The VL domain comprises a CDR1 region (CDRL1), a CDR2 region (CDRL2), a CDR3 region (CDRL3) and Framework regions. The VH domain comprises a CDR1 region (CDRH1), a CDR2 region (CDRH2), a CDR3 region (CDRH3) and Framework regions.
The term “CDR” refers to one of the six hypervariable regions within the variable domains of an antibody that mainly contribute to antigen binding. One of the most commonly used definitions for the six CDRs was provided by Kabat E. A. et al., (1991) Sequences of proteins of immunological interest. NIH Publication 91-3242). As used herein, Kabat's definition of CDRs only apply for CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 of the light chain variable domain (CDR L1, CDR L2, CDR L3, or L1, L2, L3), as well as for CDR2 and CDR3 of the heavy chain variable domain (CDR H2, CDR H3, or H2, H3). CDR1 of the heavy chain variable domain (CDR H1 or H1), however, as used herein is defined by the following residues (Kabat numbering): It starts with position 26 and ends prior to position 36.
The CDR1 region of the VL domain consists of an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:1. Preferably, the CDR1 region of the VL domain consists of an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21 and SEQ ID NO:22. Most preferably, the CDR1 region of the VL domain consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:7.
The CDR2 region of the VL domain consists of an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:2. Preferably, the CDR2 region of the VL domain consists of an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:23, SEQ ID NO:24, SEQ ID NO:25, and SEQ ID NO:26. Most preferably, the CDR2 region of the VL domain consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:8.
The CDR3 region of the VL domain consists of an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:3. Preferably, the CDR3 region of the VL domain consists of an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31 and SEQ ID NO:32. Most preferably, the CDR3 region of the VL domain consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:9.
The CDR1 region of the VH domain consists of an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:4. Preferably, the CDR1 region of the VH domain consists of an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35 and SEQ ID NO:36. Most preferably, the CDR1 region of the VH domain consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:10.
The CDR2 region of the VH domain consists of an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:5. Preferably, the CDR2 region of the VH domain consists of an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:38, SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:40 and SEQ ID NO:41. Most preferably, the CDR2 region of the VH domain consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:11.
The CDR3 region of the VH domain consists of an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:6. Preferably, the CDR3 region of the VH domain consists of an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, SEQ ID NO:44, SEQ ID NO:45, SEQ ID NO:46, SEQ ID NO:47 and SEQ ID NO:48. Most preferably, the CDR3 region of the VH domain consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:12.
In a particular embodiment, the antibody of the invention or the functional fragment of the invention comprises (i) a VL domain comprising a CDR1 region having an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:1, a CDR2 region having an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:2, and a CDR3 region having an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:3, and (ii) a VH domain comprising a CDR1 region having an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:4, a CDR2 region having an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:5, and a CDR3 region having an amino acid sequence in accordance with the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:6 In a particular embodiment, the antibody of the invention or the functional fragment of the invention comprises (i) a VL domain comprising a CDR1 region having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:7, a CDR2 region having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:8, and a CDR3 region having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:9, and (ii) a VH domain comprising a CDR1 region having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:10, a CDR2 region having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:11, and a CDR3 region having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:12.
In a more preferred embodiment, the antibody of the invention or the functional fragment of the invention comprises a VH domain having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:13. In another more preferred embodiment the antibody or functional fragment comprises a VL domain having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:14 or SEQ ID NO:54. Most preferably, the antibody of the invention or the functional fragment of the invention comprises (i) a VH domain having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:13, and (ii) a VL domain having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:14.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the functional fragment is a single chain antibody (scFv) comprising a VH domain having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:13 and a VL domain having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:14 or SEQ ID NO:54. The VH domain and the VL domain are preferably linked by a peptide linker. The peptide linker (hereinafter referred to as “linkerA”) typically has a length of about 10 to about 30 amino acids, more preferably of about 15 to about 25 amino acids. The linkerA typically comprises Gly and Ser residues, but other amino acids are also possible. In preferred embodiments the linker comprises multiple repeats of the sequence GGGGS (SEQ ID NO:50), e.g. 2 to 6, or 3 to 5, or 4 consecutive repeats of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:50. Most preferably, the linkerA consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:49. The scFv may have the following structure (with the N-terminus being left and the C-terminus being right):
More preferably, the functional fragment is a single chain antibody (scFv) consisting of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:15 or SEQ ID NO:55. Most preferably, the functional fragment is a single chain antibody (scFv) consisting of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:15.
In another particularly preferred embodiment, the functional fragment is a diabody comprising a VH domain having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:13 and a VL domain having the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:14 or SEQ ID NO:54. The VH domain and the VL domain are linked by a peptide linker. The peptide linker (hereinafter referred to as “linkerB”) preferably has a length of about 2 to about 10 amino acids, more preferably of about 5 amino acids. The linkerB typically comprises Gly and Ser residues, but other amino acids are also possible. Most preferably, the linkerB consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:50.
The diabody preferably is a monospecific diabody, i.e. it is directed to one epitope only. The diabody is preferably a homodimer. The diabody may be a dimer of two polypeptide chains that are non-covalently bound to each other. Each monomer may be a polypeptide chain having the structure:
Moreover, diabody-forming fragments can be joined via a linkerA or the like to form single-chain diabodies (sc(Fv)2). By joining diabody-forming fragments using a long linker of about 15-20 amino acids, noncovalent bonds can be formed between diabody-forming fragments existing on the same chain to form dimers. Examples of the arrangements of single-chain diabodies include the following.
Preferably the diabody of the invention has the following structure:
Most preferably the diabody consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:51.
Based on the same principle as for preparing diabodies, polymerized antibodies such as trimers or tetramers can also be prepared by joining three or more diabody-forming fragments.
In another particular embodiment the antibody of the invention is an immunoglobulin, preferably an immunoglobulin G (IgG). The subclass of the IgG of the invention is not limited and includes IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4. Preferably, the IgG of the invention is of subclass 1, i.e. it is an IgG, molecule. In one embodiment, each light chain of the IgG molecule of the invention has the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:52, and/or each heavy chain of the IgG molecule of the invention has the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:53. A specific IgG of the invention consists of two light chains and two heavy chains, wherein each of the two light chains has the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:52, and each of the two heavy chains has the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:53.
Affinity
The antibody or functional fragment of the invention has a high affinity to human TNFα. The term “KD,” refers to the dissociation equilibrium constant of a particular antibody-antigen interaction. Typically, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention binds to human TNFα with a dissociation equilibrium constant (KD) of less than approximately 2×10−10 M, preferably less than 1.5×10−10 M, preferably less than 1.25×10−10 M, more preferably less than 1×10−10 M, most preferably less than 7.5×10−11 M or even less than 5×10−11 M, as determined using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technology in a BIACORE instrument. In particular, the determination of the KD is carried out as described in Example 2, section 2.1.1.
Cross-Reactivity to TNFα from Cynomolgus Monkeys or from Rhesus Macaques
In particular embodiments, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention has substantial affinity to TNFα from animals such as Cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) and/or Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). This is advantageous, as preclinical tests of anti-human TNFα antibodies such as toxicity studies are preferably performed with such animals. Accordingly, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is preferably cross-reactive with TNFα from animals such as Cynomolgus monkeys and/or Rhesus macaques. Affinity measurements are carried out as described in Example 2, section 2.1.1.
In one embodiment, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is cross-reactive with TNFα from Macaca fascicularis. The antibody or functional fragment of the invention preferably has an affinity to Macaca fascicularis TNFα that is less than 20-fold, particularly less than 10-fold, even more particularly less than 5-fold different to that of human TNFα. Typically, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention binds to TNFα from Macaca fascicularis with a dissociation equilibrium constant (KD), wherein the ratio RM. fascicularis of (i) the KD for binding to TNFα from Macaca fascicularis to (ii) the KD for binding to human TNFα is less than 20.
RM. fascicularis is preferably less than 20, particularly less than 10, even more particularly less than 5.
In another embodiment, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is cross-reactive with TNFα from Macaca mulatta. The antibody or functional fragment of the invention preferably has an affinity to Macaca mulatta TNFα that is less than 20-fold, more particularly less than 10-fold different to that of human TNFα. Typically, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention binds to TNFα from Macaca mulatta with a dissociation equilibrium constant (KD), wherein the ratio RM. mulatta of (i) the KD for binding to TNFα from Macaca mulatta to (ii) the KD for binding to human TNFα is less than 20.
RM. mulatta is preferably less than 20, particularly less than 10.
In yet another embodiment, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is cross-reactive with TNFα from Macaca fascicularis and with TNFα from Macaca mulatta. The antibody or functional fragment of the invention preferably has an affinity to Macaca fascicularis TNFα that is less than 20-fold, particularly less than 10-fold, even more particularly less than 5-fold different to that of human TNFα, and it preferably has an affinity to Macaca mulatta TNFα that is less than 20-fold, more particularly less than 10-fold different to that of human TNFα. The ratio RM. fascicularis of the antibody or functional fragment is preferably less than 20, particularly less than 10, even more particularly less than 5, and the ratio RM. mulatta of the antibody or functional fragment is preferably less than 20, particularly less than 10.
Potency to Inhibit TNFα-Induced Apoptosis of L929 Cells
The antibody or functional fragment of the invention has a high potency to inhibit TNFα-induced apoptosis of L929 cells. In a particular embodiment, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention has a potency to inhibit TNFα-induced apoptosis of L929 cells greater than that of the known antibody infliximab.
Potency relative to infliximab can be determined in an L929 assay as described in Example 2, section 2.1.2 of this application. The relative potency of the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is greater than 1.5, preferably greater than 2, more preferably greater than 3, more preferably greater than 5, more preferably greater than 7.5, or even greater than 10, wherein the relative potency is the ratio of (i) the IC50 value of infliximab in an L929 assay over (ii) the IC50 value of the antibody or functional fragment of the invention in the L929 assay, and wherein the IC50 indicates the concentration in ng/mL of the respective molecule necessary to achieve 50% of maximal inhibition of TNFα-induced apoptosis of L929 cells.
In another embodiment, the relative potency of the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is greater than 1.5, preferably greater than 2, more preferably greater than 3, more preferably greater than 5, more preferably greater than 7.5, or even greater than 10, wherein the relative potency is the ratio of (i) the IC90 value of infliximab in an L929 assay over (ii) the IC90 value of the antibody or functional fragment of the invention in the L929 assay, and wherein the IC90 value indicates the concentration in ng/mL of the respective molecule necessary to achieve 90% of maximal inhibition of TNFα-induced apoptosis of L929 cells.
Inhibition of LPS-Induced Cytokine Secretion
Typically, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is capable of inhibiting LPS-induced cytokine secretion from monocytes. LPS-induced cytokine secretion from monocytes can be determined as described in Example 7.
In one embodiment, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is capable of inhibiting LPS-induced secretion of interleukin-1β from CD14+ monocytes. The IC50 value for inhibiting LPS-induced secretion of interleukin-1β is preferably less than 1 nM and/or less than 100 pg/mL. The IC50 value for inhibiting LPS-induced secretion of interleukin-1β, on a molar basis and/or on a weight-per-volume basis, is preferably lower than that of adalimumab.
In another embodiment, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is capable of inhibiting LPS-induced secretion of TNFα from CD14+ monocytes. The IC50 value for inhibiting LPS-induced secretion of TNFα is preferably less than 1 nM and/or less than 150 pg/mL. The IC50 value for inhibiting LPS-induced secretion of TNFα, on a molar basis and/or on a weight-per-volume basis, is preferably lower than that of adalimumab.
Inhibition of Cell Proliferation
The antibody or functional fragment of the invention is typically capable of inhibiting cell proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a mixed lymphocyte reaction. The inhibition of cell proliferation can be determined as described in Example 6. The stimulation index of the antibody or functional fragment, e.g. of the scFv or diabody of the invention, determined according to Example 6, is preferably less than 5, more preferably less than 4.5. In particular embodiments, the stimulation index of the antibody, e.g. of the IgG of the invention, is less than 4 or even less than 3.
Inhibition of Interaction Between TNFα and TNF Receptor
Typically, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is capable of inhibiting the interaction between human TNFα and TNF receptor I (TNFRI). The inhibition of the interaction between human TNFα and TNFRI can be determined in an inhibition ELISA as described below in Example 2, section 2.1.3.
The potency of the antibody or functional fragment of the invention to inhibit the interaction between human TNFα and TNFRI, relative to that of infliximab (relative potency), as determined in an inhibition ELISA, is preferably at least 2, wherein said relative potency is the ratio of the IC50 value in ng/mL of infliximab to the IC50 value in ng/mL of the antibody or functional fragment thereof.
Typically, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is capable of inhibiting the interaction between human TNFα and TNF receptor II (TNFRII). The inhibition of the interaction between human TNFα and TNFRII can be determined in an inhibition ELISA as described below in Example 2, section 2.1.3.
The potency of the antibody or functional fragment of the invention to inhibit the interaction between human TNFα and TNFRII, relative to that of infliximab (relative potency), as determined in an inhibition ELISA, is preferably at least 2, more preferably at least 3, wherein said relative potency is the ratio of the IC50 value in ng/mL of infliximab to the IC50 value in ng/mL of the antibody or functional fragment thereof.
Stoichiometry and Crosslinking
The antibody or functional fragment of the invention is typically capable of binding to human TNFαTrimer in a stoichiometry (antibody: TNFαTrimer) of at least 2. The stoichiometry (antibody: TNFαTimer) is preferably greater than 2, or at least 2.5, or at least 3. In one embodiment, the stoichiometry (antibody: TNFαTrimer) is about 3. The stoichiometry (antibody: TNFαTrimer) can be determined as described in Example 4 below.
In another embodiment, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is capable of forming a complex with human TNFα, wherein said complex comprises at least two molecules of TNFα and at least three molecules of antibody or functional fragment. The functional fragment in accordance with this embodiment comprises at least two separate binding sites for TNFα such as, e.g. diabodies. Complex formation can be determined as described in Example 5 below.
In one embodiment, the antibody is an IgG, and is capable of forming a complex of at least 600 kDa with TNFα. In another embodiment, the functional fragment is a diabody, and is capable of forming a complex of at least 300 kDa with TNFα.
Target Selectivity
In certain embodiments, the antibody or the functional fragment of the invention has a high target selectivity, i.e. it can discriminate between TNFα and TNFβ. Preferably, the IC50 value of TNFβ is at least 1,000 times greater than the IC50 value of TNFα, as determined in a competition ELISA as described in Example 2, section 2.1.4. More preferably, the IC50 value of TNFβ is at least 5,000 times, most preferably at least 10,000 greater than the IC50 value of TNFα, as determined in a competition ELISA as described in Example 2, section 2.1.4.
Expression Yield and Refolding Yield
In other embodiments, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention, preferably the scFv or diabody, can be recombinantly expressed in high yield in microorganisms such as bacteria or in other cells. Preferably, the expression yield in E. coli, determined as described in Example 2, is at least 0.25 g/L. This particularly applies to functional fragments such as scFvs.
The refolding yield, determined as described in Example 2, is at least 5 mg/L, more preferably at least 10 mg/L, more preferably at least 15 mg/L, and most preferably at least 20 mg/L. This particularly applies to functional fragments such as scFvs.
Stability
Typically, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention, preferably the scFv or diabody, has a high stability. Stability can be assessed by different methodologies. The “melting temperature” Tm of the variable domain of the antibody or functional fragment of the invention, determined by differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) as described in Example 2, section 2.2.4, is preferably at least 65° C., more preferably at least 68° C., most preferably at least 70° C. The “melting temperature of the variable domain”, as used herein, refers to the melting temperature of an scFv consisting of the sequence VL-LinkerA-VH, wherein the amino acid sequence of LinkerA consists of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:49. For example, the melting temperature of the variable domain of an IgG is defined as the melting temperature of its corresponding scFv as defined above.
The loss in monomer content (at a concentration of 10 g/L; initial monomer content>95%) after storage for four weeks at 4° C., determined by analytical size-exclusion chromatography as described in Example 2, section 2.2.5, is preferably less than 5%, more preferably less than 3%, more preferably less than 1%, most preferably less than 0.5%. The loss in monomer content (at a concentration of 10 g/L; initial monomer content>95%) after storage for four weeks at −20° C., determined by analytical size-exclusion chromatography as described in Example 2, section 2.2.5, is preferably less than 5%, more preferably less than 3%, more preferably less than 1%, most preferably less than 0.5%. The loss in monomer content (at a concentration of 10 g/L; initial monomer content>95%) after storage for four weeks at −65° C., determined by analytical size-exclusion chromatography as described in Example 2, section 2.2.5, is preferably less than 5%, more preferably less than 3%, more preferably less than 1%, most preferably less than 0.5%.
The monomer loss after five consecutive freeze-thaw cycles, determined as described in Example 2, is less than 5%, more preferably less than 1%, more preferably less than 0.5%, most preferably less than 0.2%, e.g. 0.1% or 0.0%.
Antibodies and Functional Fragments
Particular embodiments of the invention relate to functional fragments of the antibodies described herein. Functional fragments include, but are not limited to, F(ab′)2 fragment, a Fab fragment, scFv, diabodies, triabodies and tetrabodies. Preferably, the functional fragment is a single chain antibody (scFv) or a diabody. More preferably, the non-CDR sequences of the scFv or of the diabody are human sequences.
Preferably in order to minimize potential for immunogenicity in humans the chosen acceptor scaffold is composed of framework regions derived from human consensus sequences or human germline sequences. In particular framework regions I to III of the variable light domain consist of human VK1 consensus sequences according to SEQ ID NOs: 56 to 58 and a framework region IV of a λ germline-based sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs:59 to 62. As residues that are not human consensus or human germline residues may cause immune reactions the number of such residues in each variable domain (VH or VL) should be as low as possible, preferably lower than 7, more preferably lower than 4, most preferably 0.
Preferably the antibody is a monoclonal antibody. The term “monoclonal antibody” as used herein is not limited to antibodies produced through hybridoma technology. The term “monoclonal antibody” refers to an antibody that is derived from a single clone, including any eukaryotic, prokaryotic, or phage clone, and not the method by which it is produced. Monoclonal antibodies can be prepared using a wide variety of techniques known in the art including the use of hybridoma, recombinant, and phage display technologies, or a combination thereof. (Harlow and Lane, “Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual” CSH Press 1988, Cold Spring Harbor N.Y.).
In other embodiments, including embodiments relating to the in vivo use of the anti-TNFα antibodies in humans, chimeric, primatized, humanized, or human antibodies can be used. In a preferred embodiment, the antibody is a human antibody or a humanized antibody, more preferably a monoclonal human antibody or a monoclonal humanized antibody.
The term “chimeric” antibody as used herein refers to an antibody having variable sequences derived from a non-human immunoglobulin, such as a rat or mouse antibody, and human immunoglobulins constant regions, typically chosen from a human immunoglobulin template. Methods for producing chimeric antibodies are known in the art. See, e.g., Morrison, 1985, Science 229(4719): 1202-7; Oi et al, 1986, BioTechniques 4:214-221; Gillies et al., 1985, J. Immunol. Methods 125: 191-202; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,807,715; 4,816,567; and 4,816397, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Different recombinant methodologies are available to one of ordinary skill in the art to render a non-human (e.g., murine) antibody more human-like by generating immunoglobulins, immunoglobulin chains or fragments thereof (such as Fv, Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2 or other target-binding subsequences of antibodies), which contain minimal sequences derived from such non-human immunoglobulin. In general, the resulting recombinant antibody will comprise substantially all of at least one, and typically two, variable domains, in which all or substantially all of the CDR regions correspond to those of a non-human immunoglobulin and all or substantially all of the FR regions are those of a human immunoglobulin sequence, particularly a human immunoglobulin consensus sequence. CDR-grafted antibodies are antibody molecules having one or more complementarity determining regions (CDRs) from an antibody originally generated in a non-human species that bind the desired antigen and framework (FR) regions from a human immunoglobulin molecule (EP239400; PCT publication WO 91/09967; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,225,539; 5,530,101 and 5,585,089). Often, in a process called “humanization”, framework residues in the human framework regions will additionally be substituted with the corresponding residue from the CDR donor antibody to alter, preferably improve, antigen binding. These framework substitutions are identified by methods well known in the art, e.g., by modeling of the interactions of the CDR and framework residues to identify framework residues important for antigen binding and sequence comparison to identify unusual framework residues at particular positions. See, e.g., Riechmann et al., 1988, Nature 332:323-7 and Queen et al, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,530,101; 5,585,089; 5,693,761; 5,693,762; and 6,180,370 (each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety). Antibodies can be rendered more human using a variety of additional techniques known in the art including, for example, veneering or resurfacing (EP592106; EP519596; Padlan, 1991, Mol. Immunol, 28:489-498; Studnicka et al, 1994, Prot. Eng. 7:805-814; Roguska et al, 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91:969-973, and chain shuffling (U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,332), all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. A CDR-grafted or humanized antibody can also comprise at least a portion of an immunoglobulin constant region (Fc), typically that of a human immunoglobulin template chosen.
In some embodiments, humanized antibodies are prepared as described in Queen et al, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,530,101; 5,585,089; 5,693,761; 5,693,762; and 6,180,370 (each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety).
In some embodiments, the anti-TNFα antibodies are human antibodies. Completely “human” anti-TNFα antibodies can be desirable for therapeutic treatment of human patients. As used herein, “human antibodies” include antibodies having the amino acid sequence of a human immunoglobulin and include antibodies isolated from human immunoglobulin libraries or from animals transgenic for one or more human immunoglobulin and that do not express endogenous immunoglobulins. Human antibodies can be made by a variety of methods known in the art including phage display methods described above using antibody libraries derived from human immunoglobulin sequences. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,444,887 and 4,716,111; and PCT publications WO 98/46645; WO 98/50433; WO 98/24893; WO 98/16654; WO 96/34096; WO 96/33735; and WO 91/10741, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Human antibodies can also be produced using transgenic mice which are incapable of expressing functional endogenous immunoglobulins, but which can express human immunoglobulin genes. See, e.g., PCT publications WO 98/24893; WO 92/01047; WO 96/34096; WO 96/33735; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,413,923; 5,625,126; 5,633,425; 5,569,825; 5,661,016; 5,545,806; 5,814,318; 5,885,793; 5,916,771; and 5,939,598, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. Completely human antibodies that recognize a selected epitope can be generated using a technique referred to as “guided selection.” In this approach a selected non-human monoclonal antibody, e.g., a mouse antibody, is used to guide the selection of a completely human antibody recognizing the same epitope (Jespers et al, 1988, Biotechnology 12:899-903).
In some embodiments, the anti-TNFα antibodies are primatized antibodies. The term “primatized antibody” refers to an antibody comprising monkey variable regions and human constant regions. Methods for producing primatized antibodies are known in the art. See e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,658,570; 5,681,722; and 5,693,780, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
In some embodiments, the anti-TNFα antibodies are derivatized antibodies. For example, but not by way of limitation, the derivatized antibodies that have been modified, e.g., by glycosylation, acetylation, pegylation, phosphorylation, amidation, derivatization by known protecting/blocking groups, proteolytic cleavage, linkage to a cellular ligand or other protein (see below for a discussion of antibody conjugates), etc. Any of numerous chemical modifications may be carried out by known techniques, including, but not limited to, specific chemical cleavage, acetylation, formylation, metabolic synthesis of tunicamycin, etc. Additionally, the derivative may contain one or more non-classical amino acids.
In yet other aspects, an anti-TNFα antibody has one or more amino acids inserted into one or more of its hypervariable region, for example as described in US 2007/0280931.
Antibody Conjugates
In some embodiments, the anti-TNFα antibodies are antibody conjugates that are modified, e.g., by the covalent attachment of any type of molecule to the antibody, such that covalent attachment does not interfere with binding to TNFα.Techniques for conjugating effector moieties to antibodies are well known in the art (See, e.g., Hellstrom et al., Controlled Drag Delivery, 2nd Ed., at pp. 623-53 (Robinson et al., eds., 1987)); Thorpe et al., 1982, Immunol. Rev. 62: 119-58 and Dubowchik et al., 1999, Pharmacology and Therapeutics 83:67-123).
In one example, the antibody or fragment thereof is fused via a covalent bond (e.g., a peptide bond), at optionally the N-terminus or the C-terminus, to an amino acid sequence of another protein (or portion thereof; preferably at least a 10, 20 or 50 amino acid portion of the protein). Preferably the antibody, or fragment thereof, is linked to the other protein at the N-terminus of the constant domain of the antibody. Recombinant DNA procedures can be used to create such fusions, for example as described in WO 86/01533 and EP0392745. In another example the effector molecule can increase half-life in vivo. Examples of suitable effector molecules of this type include polymers, albumin, albumin binding proteins or albumin binding compounds such as those described in WO 2005/117984.
In some embodiments, anti-TNFα antibodies can be attached to poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG) moieties. For example, if the antibody is an antibody fragment, the PEG moieties can be attached through any available amino acid side-chain or terminal amino acid functional group located in the antibody fragment, for example any free amino, imino, thiol, hydroxyl or carboxyl group. Such amino acids can occur naturally in the antibody fragment or can be engineered into the fragment using recombinant DNA methods. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,996. Multiple sites can be used to attach two or more PEG molecules. Preferably PEG moieties are covalently linked through a thiol group of at least one cysteine residue located in the antibody fragment. Where a thiol group is used as the point of attachment, appropriately activated effector moieties, for example thiol selective derivatives such as maleimides and cysteine derivatives, can be used.
In another example, an anti-TNFα antibody conjugate is a modified Fab′ fragment which is PEGylated, i.e., has PEG (poly(ethyleneglycol)) covalently attached thereto, e.g., according to the method disclosed in EP0948544. See also Poly(ethyleneglycol) Chemistry, Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications, (J. Milton Harris (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, 1992); Poly(ethyleneglycol) Chemistry and Biological Applications, (J. Milton Harris and S. Zalipsky, eds., American Chemical Society, Washington D. C, 1997); and Bioconjugation Protein Coupling Techniques for the Biomedical Sciences, (M. Aslam and A. Dent, eds., Grove Publishers, New York, 1998); and Chapman, 2002, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 54:531-545.
Pharmaceutical Compositions and Treatment
Treatment of a disease encompasses the treatment of patients already diagnosed as having any form of the disease at any clinical stage or manifestation; the delay of the onset or evolution or aggravation or deterioration of the symptoms or signs of the disease; and/or preventing and/or reducing the severity of the disease.
A “subject” or “patient” to whom an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment thereof is administered can be a mammal, such as a non-primate (e.g., cow, pig, horse, cat, dog, rat, etc.) or a primate (e.g., monkey or human). In certain aspects, the human is a pediatric patient. In other aspects, the human is an adult patient.
Compositions comprising an anti-TNFα antibody and, optionally one or more additional therapeutic agents, such as the second therapeutic agents described below, are described herein. The compositions typically are supplied as part of a sterile, pharmaceutical composition that includes a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. This composition can be in any suitable form (depending upon the desired method of administering it to a patient).
The anti-TNFα antibodies and functional fragments can be administered to a patient by a variety of routes such as orally, transdermally, subcutaneously, intranasally, intravenously, intramuscularly, intrathecally, topically or locally. The most suitable route for administration in any given case will depend on the particular antibody, the subject, and the nature and severity of the disease and the physical condition of the subject. Typically, an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment thereof will be administered intravenously.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is administered orally. If the administration is via the oral route the functional fragment is preferably a single chain antibody (scFv), diabody or IgG.
In typical embodiments, an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment is present in a pharmaceutical composition at a concentration sufficient to permit intravenous administration at 0.5 mg/kg body weight to 20 mg/kg body weight. In some embodiments, the concentration of antibody or fragment suitable for use in the compositions and methods described herein includes, but is not limited to, 0.5 mg/kg, 0.75 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg, 9 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 11 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, 13 mg/kg, 14 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg, 16 mg/kg, 17 mg/kg, 18 mg/kg, 19 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, or a concentration ranging between any of the foregoing values, e.g., 1 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg to 18 mg/kg.
The effective dose of an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment can range from about 0.001 to about 750 mg/kg per single (e.g., bolus) administration, multiple administrations or continuous administration, or to achieve a serum concentration of 0.01-5000 pg/ml serum concentration per single (e.g., bolus) administration, multiple administrations or continuous administration, or any effective range or value therein depending on the condition being treated, the route of administration and the age, weight and condition of the subject. In certain embodiments, each dose can range from about 0.5 mg to about 50 mg per kilogram of body weight or from about 3 mg to about 30 mg per kilogram body weight. The antibody can be formulated as an aqueous solution.
Pharmaceutical compositions can be conveniently presented in unit dose forms containing a predetermined amount of an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment per dose. Such a unit can contain 0.5 mg to 5 g, for example, but without limitation, 1 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, 1000 mg, or any range between any two of the foregoing values, for example 10 mg to 1000 mg, 20 mg to 50 mg, or 30 mg to 300 mg. Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers can take a wide variety of forms depending, e.g., on the condition to be treated or route of administration.
Determination of the effective dosage, total number of doses, and length of treatment an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment thereof is well within the capabilities of those skilled in the art, and can be determined using a standard dose escalation study.
Therapeutic formulations of the anti-TNFα antibodies and functional fragments suitable in the methods described herein can be prepared for storage as lyophilized formulations or aqueous solutions by mixing the antibody having the desired degree of purity with optional pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers, excipients or stabilizers typically employed in the art (all of which are referred to herein as “carriers”), i.e., buffering agents, stabilizing agents, preservatives, isotonifiers, non-ionic detergents, antioxidants, and other miscellaneous additives. See, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16th edition (Osol, ed. 1980). Such additives must be nontoxic to the recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed.
Buffering agents help to maintain the pH in the range which approximates physiological conditions. They can present at concentration ranging from about 2 mM to about 50 mM. Suitable buffering agents include both organic and inorganic acids and salts thereof such as citrate buffers (e.g., monosodium citrate-disodium citrate mixture, citric acid-trisodium citrate mixture, citric acid-monosodium citrate mixture, etc.), succinate buffers (e.g., succinic acid-monosodium succinate mixture, succinic acid-sodium hydroxide mixture, succinic acid-disodium succinate mixture, etc.), tartrate buffers (e.g., tartaric acid-sodium tartrate mixture, tartaric acid-potassium tartrate mixture, tartaric acid-sodium hydroxide mixture, etc.), fumarate buffers (e.g., fumaric acid-monosodium fumarate mixture, fumaric acid-disodium fumarate mixture, monosodium fumarate-disodium fumarate mixture, etc.), gluconate buffers (e.g., gluconic acid-sodium glyconate mixture, gluconic acid-sodium hydroxide mixture, gluconic acid-potassium glyuconate mixture, etc.), oxalate buffer (e.g., oxalic acid-sodium oxalate mixture, oxalic acid-sodium hydroxide mixture, oxalic acid-potassium oxalate mixture, etc), lactate buffers (e.g., lactic acid-sodium lactate mixture, lactic acid-sodium hydroxide mixture, lactic acid-potassium lactate mixture, etc.) and acetate buffers (e.g., acetic acid-sodium acetate mixture, acetic acid-sodium hydroxide mixture, etc.). Additionally, phosphate buffers, histidine buffers and trimethylamine salts such as Tris can be used.
Preservatives can be added to retard microbial growth, and can be added in amounts ranging from 0.2%-1% (w/v). Suitable preservatives include phenol, benzyl alcohol, meta-cresol, methyl paraben, propyl paraben, octadecyldimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride, benzalconium halides (e.g., chloride, bromide, and iodide), hexamethonium chloride, and alkyl parabens such as methyl or propyl paraben, catechol, resorcinol, cyclohexanol, and 3-pentanol. Isotonicifiers sometimes known as “stabilizers” can be added to ensure isotonicity of liquid compositions and include polyhydric sugar alcohols, preferably trihydric or higher sugar alcohols, such as glycerin, erythritol, arabitol, xylitol, sorbitol and mannitol. Stabilizers refer to a broad category of excipients which can range in function from a bulking agent to an additive which solubilizes the therapeutic agent or helps to prevent denaturation or adherence to the container wall. Typical stabilizers can be polyhydric sugar alcohols (enumerated above); amino acids such as arginine, lysine, glycine, glutamine, asparagine, histidine, alanine, ornithine, L-leucine, 2-phenylalanine, glutamic acid, threonine, etc., organic sugars or sugar alcohols, such as lactose, trehalose, stachyose, mannitol, sorbitol, xylitol, ribitol, myoinisitol, galactitol, glycerol and the like, including cyclitols such as inositol; polyethylene glycol; amino acid polymers; sulfur containing reducing agents, such as urea, glutathione, thioctic acid, sodium thioglycolate, thioglycerol, α-monothioglycerol and sodium thio sulfate; low molecular weight polypeptides (e.g., peptides of 10 residues or fewer); proteins such as human serum albumin, bovine serum albumin, gelatin or immunoglobulins; hydrophylic polymers, such as polyvinylpyrrolidone monosaccharides, such as xylose, mannose, fructose, glucose; disaccharides such as lactose, maltose, sucrose and trisaccacharides such as raffinose; and polysaccharides such as dextran. Stabilizers can be present in the range from 0.1 to 10,000 weights per part of weight active protein.
Non-ionic surfactants or detergents (also known as “wetting agents”) can be added to help solubilize the therapeutic agent as well as to protect the therapeutic protein against agitation-induced aggregation, which also permits the formulation to be exposed to shear surface stressed without causing denaturation of the protein. Suitable non-ionic surfactants include polysorbates (20, 80, etc.), polyoxamers (184, 188 etc.), Pluronic polyols, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monoethers (TWEEN®-20, TWEEN®-80, etc.). Non-ionic surfactants can be present in a range of about 0.05 mg/ml to about 1.0 mg/ml, or in a range of about 0.07 mg/ml to about 0.2 mg/ml.
Additional miscellaneous excipients include bulking agents (e.g., starch), chelating agents (e.g., EDTA), antioxidants (e.g., ascorbic acid, methionine, vitamin E), protease inhibitors and co-solvents.
The formulation herein can also contain a second therapeutic agent in addition to an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment thereof. Examples of suitable second therapeutic agents are provided below.
The dosing schedule can vary from once a month to daily depending on a number of clinical factors, including the type of disease, severity of disease, and the patient's sensitivity to the anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment. In specific embodiments, an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment thereof is administered daily, twice weekly, three times a week, every other day, every 5 days, every 10 days, every two weeks, every three weeks, every four weeks or once a month, or in any range between any two of the foregoing values, for example from every four days to every month, from every 10 days to every two weeks, or from two to three times a week, etc.
The dosage of an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment to be administered will vary according to the particular antibody, the subject, and the nature and severity of the disease, the physical condition of the subject, the therapeutic regimen (e.g., whether a second therapeutic agent is used), and the selected route of administration; the appropriate dosage can be readily determined by a person skilled in the art.
It will be recognized by one of skill in the art that the optimal quantity and spacing of individual dosages of an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment thereof will be determined by the nature and extent of the condition being treated, the form, route and site of administration, and the age and condition of the particular subject being treated, and that a physician will ultimately determine appropriate dosages to be used. This dosage can be repeated as often as appropriate. If side effects develop the amount and/or frequency of the dosage can be altered or reduced, in accordance with normal clinical practice.
Disorders to be Treated
The invention relates to a method of treating or preventing a human TNFα-related disease in a subject, comprising administering to the subject the antibody or functional fragment as defined herein. The term “TNFα-related disorder” or “TNFα-related disease” refers to any disorder, the onset, progression or the persistence of the symptoms or disease states of which requires the participation of TNFα. Exemplary TNFα-related disorders include, but are not limited to, chronic and/or autoimmune states of inflammation in general, immune mediated inflammatory disorders in general, inflammatory CNS disease, inflammatory diseases affecting the eye, joint, skin, mucous membranes, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract or lung, states of uveitis in general, retinitis, HLA-B27+ uveitis, Behçet's disease, dry eye syndrome, glaucoma, Sjögren syndrome, diabetes mellitus (incl. diabetic neuropathy), insulin resistance, states of arthritis in general, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, reactive arthritis and Reiter's syndrome, juvenile arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, sarcoidosis, glomerulonephritis, chronic kidney disease, cystitis, psoriasis (incl. psoriatic arthritis), hidradenitis suppurativa, panniculitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis), acne, Sweet's syndrome, pemphigus, Crohn's disease (incl. extraintestinal manifestastations), ulcerative colitis, asthma bronchiale, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, general allergies, allergic rhinitis, allergic sinusitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung fibrosis, Wegener's granulomatosis, Kawasaki syndrome, Giant cell arteritis, Churg-Strauss vasculitis, polyarteritis nodosa, burns, graft versus host disease, host versus graft reactions, rejection episodes following organ or bone marrow transplantation, systemic and local states of vasculitis in general, systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematodes, polymyositis and dermatomyositis, sclerodermia, pre-eclampsia, acute and chronic pancreatitis, viral hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, postsurgical inflammation such as after eye surgery (e.g. cataract (eye lens replacement) or glaucoma surgery), joint surgery (incl. arthroscopic surgery), surgery at joint-related structures (e.g. ligaments), oral and/or dental surgery, minimally invasive cardiovascular procedures (e.g. PTCA, atherectomy, stent placement), laparoscopic and/or endoscopic intra-abdominal and gynecological procedures, endoscopic urological procedures (e.g. prostate surgery, ureteroscopy, cystoscopy, interstitial cystitis), or perioperative inflammation (prevention) in general, bullous dermatitis, neutrophilic dermatitis, toxic epidermal necrolysis, pustular dermatitis, cerebral malaria, hemolytic uremic syndrome, allograft rejection, otitis media, snakebite, erythema nodosum, myelodysplastic syndromes, primary sclerosing cholangitis, seronegative spondylartheropathy, autoimmune hematolytic anemia, orofacial granulamatosis, pyostomatitis vegetans, aphthous stomatitis, geographic tongue, migratory stoimatitis, Alzheimer disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Bell's palsy, Creutzfeld-Jakob disease and neuro-degenerative conditions in general.
Cancer-related osteolysis, cancer-related inflammation, cancer-related pain, cancer-related cachexia, bone metastases, acute and chronic forms of pain, irrespective whether these are caused by central or peripheral effects of TNFα and whether they are classified as inflammatory, nociceptive or neuropathic forms of pain, sciatica, low back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), gout, postherpetic neuralgia, fibromyalgia, local pain states, chronic pain syndroms due to metastatic tumor, dismenorrhea.
Particular disorders to be treated include states of arthritis in general, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, reactive arthritis, juvenile arthritis; psoriasis incl. psoriatic arthritis; inflammatory bowel disease, including Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis incl. proctitis, sigmoiditis, left-sided colitis, extensive colitis and pancolitis, undetermined colitis, microscopic colitis incl. collagenous and lymphocytic colitis, colitis in connective tissue disease, diversion colitis, colitis in diverticular disease, eosinophilic colitis and pouchitis.
Most preferably, the antibody or functional fragment of the invention is used to treat an inflammatory bowel disease, in particular Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or microscopic colitis. The Crohn's disease may be ileal, colonic, ileocolonic or isolated upper Crohn's disease (gastric, duodenal and/or jejunal) including non-stricturing/non-penetrating, stricturing, penetrating and perianal disease behavior, allowing any combination of localization and disease behavior of any of the above mentioned. The ulcerative colitis may be ulcerative proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, left-sided colitis, pan-ulcerative colitis and pouchitis.
Combination Therapy and other aspects
Preferably, the patient being treated with an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment thereof is also treated with another conventional medicament. For example, a patient suffering from inflammatory bowel disease, especially if having moderate to severe disease is typically also being treated with mesalazine or derivatives or prodrugs thereof, corticosteroids, e.g. budesonide or prednisolone (oral or i.v.), immunosuppressants, e.g. azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) or methotrexate, cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Other medicaments which can be co-administered to the patient include biologics such as infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab pegol or others. Further medicaments which can be co-administered to the patient include immunosupressants (e.g. azathioprine/6-MP or methotrexate or oral cyclosporine) in order to maintain stable and longer remission. Yet another aspect of the invention is the use of an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment as defined hereinabove for reducing inflammation.
Yet another aspect of the invention is an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment as defined hereinabove for use in reducing inflammation in a patient suffering from an inflammatory condition.
A further aspect of this invention is a method of treating an inflammatory condition, comprising administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment as defined hereinabove. The inflammatory condition is preferably one of the conditions described above.
A further aspect of this invention is a method of preventing an inflammatory condition, comprising administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of an anti-TNFα antibody or functional fragment as defined hereinabove. The inflammatory condition is preferably one of the conditions described above.
1. Results
1.1 Immunization
Rabbits have been immunized with purified recombinant human TNFα (Peprotech, Cat. No. 300-01A). During the course of the immunization, the strength of the humoral immune response against the antigen was qualitatively assessed by determining the maximal dilution (titer) for the serum of each rabbit that still produced detectable binding of the polyclonal serum antibodies to the antigen. Serum antibody titers against immobilized recombinant human TNFα were assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, see 2.2.1). All three rabbits showed very high titers with a 10×106-fold dilution of the serum still resulting in a positive signal (at least 3-fold higher than the signal obtained with serum from a naïve unrelated animal which was used as background control) in the ELISA. In addition, the ability of different rabbit sera to inhibit the biological activity of TNFα was assessed using a mouse L929 cell-based assay (see 2.2.3). All three sera inhibited TNFα-induced apoptosis of mouse L929 fibroblasts. Rabbit #3 showed the strongest neutralizing activity with 50% inhibition (IC50) reached at a serum dilution of 1:155′000. Compared to rabbit #3, rabbit #2 and rabbit #1 showed approximately 3 and 21-fold lower activity, reaching 50% inhibition at a serum dilution of 1:55′500 and 1:7′210, respectively.
Lymphocytes isolated from spleens of all three animals were chosen for the subsequent hit identification procedures. The animals were prioritized based on the potency to inhibit the biological activity of TNFα in the L929 assay. Therefore, the highest number of hits that were cultivated originated from rabbit #3, and the lowest number of hits was derived from rabbit #1.
1.2 Hit Identification
1.2.1 Hit Sorting
Prior to the hit identification procedure, a flow-cytometry-based sorting procedure was developed that specifically detects and allows for the isolation of high-affinity TNFα binding B-cells (see 2.1).
A total of 33×106 lymphocytes (corresponding to 1.5% of total lymphocytes isolated) derived from all three rabbits were characterized in two independent sorting campaigns. Out of the 33×106 cells analyzed in total 3452 B-cells expressing TNFα-specific antibodies (IgG) were isolated. The numbers of lymphocytes cloned were different for the three rabbits, as more cells were isolated from those rabbits whose sera showed strong inhibition of TNFα in the L929 assay. Of the isolated B-cells, 792 clones were derived from rabbit #1, 1144 clones from rabbit #2 and 1408 clones from rabbit #3. For 108 clones the respective rabbit origin is not known, because they are derived from a mixture of residual lymphocytes from all 3 rabbits to allow optimal recovery of small amount of lymphocytes from the vials.
1.2.2 Hit Screening
The results obtained during the screening phase are based on assays performed with non-purified antibodies from culture supernatants of antibody secreting cells (ASC), as the scale of the high-throughput culture does not allow for purification of the individual rabbit antibodies. Such supernatants were used to rank large numbers of antibodies relative to each other, however not to provide absolute values (e.g. for inhibition of biological activity of TNFα), except for binding affinity. ASC supernatants were screened in a high-throughput ELISA for binding to recombinant human TNFα. TNFα-binding supernatants were further characterized for binding to Cynomolgus monkey TNFα by ELISA, binding kinetics and for their potential to neutralize the biological activity of human TNFα in the L929 assay. With the exception of binding kinetics, the reporting values of the high-throughput screenings should be interpreted as “yes” or “no” answers, which are based on single-point measurements (no dose-response). Affinity to Cynomolgus monkey and mouse TNFα was analyzed for all the 102 clones that were selected for amplification and sequencing of the antibody heavy and light chain variable domains.
1.2.2.1 Binding to Human TNFα
The aim of the primary screening is to identify ASC clones that produce antibodies specific for human TNFα. For this purpose, cell culture supernatants of 3452 ASC clones were analysed for the presence of antibodies to human TNFα by ELISA (see 2.2.1). The ELISA method used assesses the “quantity” of antibodies of the IgG subtype bound to recombinant human TNFα, gives however no information about the affinity or the concentration of the antibodies. In this assay, supernatants from 894 ASC clones produced a signal that was clearly above background. The hit rate in screening was similar for rabbit #1 and rabbit #2 with 153 hits out of 792 (19.3%) identified from rabbit #1 and 225 hits out of 1144 identified from rabbit #2 (19.7%). Rabbit #3 showed a significantly higher hit rate of 34.4% resulting in the identification of 484 hits out of 1408. All 894 hits identified in this primary screening, were subjected to the measurement of binding kinetics by SPR (secondary screening).
1.2.2.2 TNFα Binding Kinetics
The aim of the secondary screening is to obtain quantitative information on the quality of target binding for each hit from the primary screening by surface plasmon resonance (SPR, see 2.2.2). In contrast to the ELISA used during the primary screening, this method assesses the kinetics of target binding as a function of time. This allows determination of the rate constants for association (ka) and dissociation (kd) of the antibody from its target. The ratio kd/ka provides the equilibrium dissociation constant (KD), which reflects the affinity of an antibody to its target. Of the 894 hits identified in the primary screening, binding affinities to human TNFα could be determined for 839 monoclonal rabbit antibodies. For the remaining 55 antibodies affinity could not be measured because the antibody concentration in the ASC supernatant was below the detection limit of the SPR instrument in the respective setup. The 839 anti-TNFα antibodies that could be measured showed dissociation constants (KD) ranging from below 1.36×10−13 M to 1.14×10−8 M. 69% of all antibodies analyzed had a KD below 0.5 nM.
The median KDs of 2.21×10−10 M and 2.09×10−10 M for screening hits identified from rabbits #2 and #3 were similar while rabbit #1 showed about 2-fold higher values with a median KD of 4.65×10−10 M. When considering only neutralizing screening hits, the affinity distributions were similar for all three animals with lower values for the median KD (median KDs between 1.4×10−10 M and 1.27×10−10 M). Affinities below 0.041 nM, 0.029 nM and 0.026 nM were measured for 5% of screening hits for rabbits #1, #2 and #3, respectively. For 2% of supernatants, affinities were even in the low picomolar range (below 6.2 pM, 7.9 pM and 11 pM). The excellent yield of high-affinity antibodies resulting from the secondary screening provides a broad basis for the selection of the most appropriate antibodies for humanization and reformatting.
1.2.2.3 Potency
For the assessment of potency, a cell-based assay (L929 assay) has been developed (see 2.2.3). 506 out of the 894 selected antibodies (56.6%), inhibited TNFα-induced apoptosis in the L929 assay by more than 50%. In line with results obtained during titer analysis, the highest percentage of neutralizing hits was derived from rabbit #3 with a hit rate of 62.8%, followed by rabbit #2 with a hit rate of 56.4% and rabbit #1 with the lowest hit rate of 39.9%. Affinities of these neutralizing antibodies ranged between 1.36×10−1 to 1.19×10−9 M.
1.2.2.4 Species Cross-Reactivity (Cynomolgus Monkey)
All 894 hits identified in the primary screening, were analyzed for species cross-reactivity to Cynomolgus monkey TNFα by ELISA (see 2.2.1). The aim of this additional screening was to allow selection of ASC clones that are known to cross-react with Cynomolgus monkey TNFα. The ELISA method used assesses the “quantity” of antibodies of the IgG subtype bound to recombinant Cynomolgus monkey TNFα, gives however no information about the affinity or the concentration of the antibodies. Supernatants from 414 (46%) ASC clones produced a clear signal (optical density (OD) ≥1). The percentage of hits cross-reactive to Cynomolgus monkey TNFα was similar for rabbit #1 and rabbit #3 with 81 hits out of 153 (52.9%) identified from rabbit #1 and 236 hits out of 484 identified from rabbit #3 (48.8%). With 37.8%, rabbit #2 showed a slightly lower percentage of cross-reactive hits resulting in the identification of 82 hits out of 225.
1.2.2.5 Selection of Clones for RT-PCR
As a prerequisite for hit confirmation, gene sequence analysis and subsequent humanization of the rabbit antibodies, the genetic information encoding the rabbit antibody variable domain needs to be retrieved. This was done by reverse transcription (RT) of the respective messenger RNA into the complementary DNA (cDNA), followed by amplification of the double stranded DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The selection of ASC clones subjected to RT-PCR was primarily based on affinity and neutralizing activity. As additional criterion cross-reactivity to Cynomolgus monkey TNFα was considered. In total 102 ASC clones were selected for gene cloning by RT-PCR. First, the 93 best ranking ASC (in terms of affinity) with a KD below 80 pM, that inhibited the biological activity of TNFα in the L929 assay by more than 50% and that showed significant binding to Cynomolgus monkey TNFα were selected. Additionally, all the 9 best ranking ASC clones with KD below 20 pM that neutralized TNFα activity by more than 50% but did not bind to Cynomolgus monkey TNFα nevertheless were chosen as well. In total, 12, 13 and 66 ASC clones were successfully amplified and sequenced from rabbits #1, #2 and #3, respectively.
1.2.2.6 Identification of Related Clones with Desired Properties
In order to characterize the genetic diversity of the panel of isolated ASC clones the sequences of the complementary determining regions (CDRs) were extracted and subjected to a multiple sequence alignment thus allowing sequence clustering in a phylogenetic tree.
While this analysis on one hand allows the selection of a diverse set of clonal sequences to be carried forward into humanization and re-formatting experiments it also identifies homologous clusters of clonal sequences that appeared to share a common parental B-cell clone in the rabbit. The hallmark of these sequence clusters are high sequence homology in the CDRs and a consistent pattern of pharmacodynamic properties. Both of these features are summarized for a cluster of eight clones in Tables 2 and 3. Despite the functional conservation of this sequence cluster the consensus sequence in Table 3 reveals that a certain variability of the CDRs is tolerated, while still resulting in the desired pharmacodynamic profile.
1.2.2.7 Cross-Reactivity to Cynomolgus Monkey TNFα (by SPR)
Because of the high number of high affinity hits that potently neutralized TNFα, species cross-reactivity was assessed for all monoclonal rabbit antibodies that were subjected to RT-PCR in order to facilitate the selection of ASC clones for Hit confirmation. Affinities to Cynomolgus monkey TNFα were determined by SPR measurements similarly as described above (see also 2.2.2). The affinities of the 93 tested antibodies for Cynomolgus monkey TNFα ranged from 9.6×10−12 to 2.1×10−9 M. 38 of the 93 cross-reactive antibodies bound human and Cynomolgus TNFα with similar affinity (less than two-fold difference in KD). Moreover, the difference in affinity between human and Cynomolgus was less than 20-fold for 79 of the 93 cross-reactive antibodies and less than 10-fold for 62 of them, which makes them acceptable for the preclinical development in the Cynomolgus monkey.
2.1 Sorting Assay
Flow-cytometry based sorting procedure for the isolation of antigen-specific B-cells from rabbit lymphatic tissue was performed as outlined by Lalor et al (Eur J Immunol. 1992; 22.3001-2011)
2.2 Screening Assays
2.2.1 TNFα Binding ELISA (Human and Cynomolgus Monkey TNFα)
Recombinant human TNFα (Peprotech, Cat. No. 300-01) was coated on a 96 well microtiter ELISA plate. Binding of rabbit antibodies in the ASC culture supernatants to the immobilized TNFα was detected by a secondary HRP-labelled anti-rabbit IgG (JacksonImmuno Research, Cat. No. 111-035-046). TMB substrate (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine, KPL, Cat. No. 53-00-00) was added and the colour reaction was stopped by the addition of H2SO4. Plates were read using a microtiter plate reader (Infinity reader M200 Pro, Tecan) at a wavelength of 450 nm.
Assay performance during the screening campaigns was monitored by a commercially available positive control anti-TNFα rabbit polyclonal antibody (AbD Serotec, Cat. No. 9295-0174). For this purpose the positive control antibody was tested at 100 and 250 ng/ml in duplicate on each screening plate. Robustness and precision of the response of the positive control was monitored for each plate. At the final assay conditions, the signal-to-background ratio was between 30 to 40 for the positive control at 250 ng/ml and coefficient of variation (CV) of the positive control were below 10%. A signal with an optical density of >100% relative to the 250 ng/ml positive control was considered as a primary screening hit.
For serum titer determinations, the same ELISA setup was used as described above. A serum dilution was considered positive when the binding signal of the immune serum was at least 3-fold higher compared to the signal of a naïve unrelated animal.
Species cross-reactivity to Cynomolgus monkey was determined using a similar ELISA as described above. Recombinant Cynomolgus monkey TNFα (Sino Biological, Cat. No. 90018-CNAE) was coated on 96 well microtiter ELISA plates. Binding of rabbit antibodies in the ASC culture supernatants to the immobilized Cynomolgus monkey TNFα was detected by the HRP-labelled secondary antibody as specified above. Immune serum from rabbit #2 was used as positive control at a dilution of 1:80′000 and 1:320′000. Robustness and precision of the response of the positive control was monitored for each plate. At the final assay conditions, the signal-to-background ratio was between 20 to 30 for the positive control at a dilution of 1:80′000 and CVs of the positive control were below 10%.
2.2.2 Binding Kinetics to TNFα by SPR (Human and Cynomolgus Monkey)
Binding affinities of antibodies towards human TNFα were measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) using a MASS-1 SPR instrument (Sierra Sensors). Performance of the instrument was qualified by means of standard reference solutions as well as by analysis of a reference antibody-antigen interaction such as infliximab-TNFα interaction.
For affinity screening, an antibody specific for the Fc region of rabbit IgGs (Bethyl Laboratories, Cat. No. A120-111A) was immobilized on a sensor chip (SPR-2 Affinity Sensor, High Capacity Amine, Sierra Sensors) using a standard amine-coupling procedure. Rabbit monoclonal antibodies in ASC supernatants were captured by the immobilized anti-rabbit IgG antibody. After capturing of the monoclonal antibodies, human TNFα (Peprotech, Cat. No. 300-01) was injected into the flow cells for 3 min at a concentration of 90 nM, and dissociation of the protein from the IgG captured on the sensor chip was allowed to proceed for 5 min. After each injection cycle, surfaces were regenerated with two injections of 10 mM Glycine-HCl. The apparent dissociation (kd) and association (ka) rate constants and the apparent dissociation equilibrium constant (KD) were calculated with the MASS-1 analysis software (Analyzer, Sierra Sensors) using one-to-one Langmuir binding model and quality of the fits was monitored based on relative Chi2 (Chi2 normalized to the extrapolated maximal binding level of the analyte), which is a measure for the quality of the curve fitting. For most of the Hits the relative Chi2 value was below 15%. Results were deemed valid if the response units (RU) for ligand binding were at least 2% of the RUs for antibody capturing. Samples with RUs for ligand binding with less than 2% of the RUs for antibody capturing were considered to show no specific binding of TNFα to the captured antibody.
Species cross-reactivity to Cynomolgus monkey TNFα (Sino Biological, Cat. No. 90018-CNAE) was measured using the same assay setup and TNFα concentrations and applying the same quality measures. The relative Chi2 was below 15% for most of the ASC supernatants analyzed.
2.2.3 TNFα-Induced Apoptosis in L929 Fibroblasts
The ability of rabbit IgGs from ASC culture supernatants to neutralize the biological activity of recombinant human TNFα was assessed using mouse L929 fibroblasts (ATCC/LGC Standards, Cat. No. CCL-1). L929 cells were sensitized to TNFα-induced apoptosis by addition of 1 μg/ml actinomycin D. Cells were cultured in 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates in the presence of 50% ASC culture supernatant and 100 pM (5.2 ng/ml) human TNFα (Peprotech, Cat. No. 300-01) for 24 h. Compared to purified antibodies, higher concentrations of TNFα have to be used in the presence of ASC supernatants for hit screening. Survival of the cells was determined by a colorimetric assay using the WST-8 (2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt) cell proliferation reagent (Sigma Aldrich, Cat. No. 96992).WST-8 is reduced by cellular dehydrogenases to an orange formazan product. The amount of formazan produced is directly proportional to the number of living cells. Data were analyzed using a four-parameter logistic curve fit using the Softmax Data Analysis Software (Molecular Devices), and the concentration of infliximab required to neutralize TNFα-induced apoptosis by 50% (IC50) was calculated at a concentration of 36.2 ng/ml. Therefore, the estimated lower limit of detection for this assay is between 30 to 40 ng/ml. This value is only a rough estimate for the detection limit, since the potential to block TNFα is not only dependent on the concentration of the monoclonal antibody but also on affinity of the antibody to the target. However, the sensitivity of the assay is sufficient for screening of ASC supernatants since IgG concentrations in most ASC supernatants are above a concentration of 40 ng/ml. Supernatants resulting in 50% neutralization of TNFα-induced apoptosis were considered positive.
To assure robust assay performance during the screening campaigns the positive control antibody infliximab was tested at 115 ng/ml (0.8 nM) and at 58 ng/ml (0.4 nM) in duplicates on each screening plate. Percent inhibition and precision of the response for the positive control was monitored for each screening plate. The acceptance criteria for each plate were set as follows: at least 60% inhibition with the positive control antibody at a concentration of 115 ng/ml with a coefficient of variation (CV) below 20%.
1. Results
1.1 Hit Confirmation & Selection of Hits for Humanization
73 unique sets of parental rabbit light and heavy chain variable domains were retrieved during hit screening and analyzed by sequence alignment. Based on the screening assay results and the sequence homology of the individual rabbit IgG clones, 30 candidates were selected for hit confirmation. 29 monoclonal antibodies were manufactured and the best performing clones in terms of affinity and potency were selected for the humanization and lead candidate generation. The criteria for the selection of clones were i) neutralization of human TNFα in L929 assay, ii) high affinity to human TNFα, iii) cross-reactivity to Cynomolgus and Rhesus monkey TNFα, and iv) sequence diversity. One clone (16-22-H05) has been selected for humanization—one of the best ranking IgGs in terms of potency to neutralize human TNFα in the L929 assay. With respect to binding strength, the best possible affinity is desired since a certain loss of affinity needs to be anticipated as a result of humanization and reformatting into the scFv format.
The data fro IgG clone No. 16-22-H05 are summarized in Table 4.
1.2 Generation and Selection of Humanized scFv Fragments
The sequences encoding the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) were transferred in silico by CDR-loop grafting onto a human variable domain scaffold sequence as described in WO 2014/206561. In addition a second construct was generated per rabbit clone, which transferred additional amino acids from the donor sequence at positions with structural relevance for the immunoglobulin domains and CDR positioning. An artificial gene (with an optimized codon usage for bacterial expression) encoding the respective humanized single-chain antibody Fv (scFv) was synthesized (from the corresponding variable light and heavy chains). The polypeptide was then produced and subsequently characterized using similar assays as described during the hit confirmation.
1.2.1 Humanization and Manufacture of Humanized scFv (APIs)
The humanization of the selected clone comprised the transfer of the rabbit CDRs onto a scFv acceptor framework of the VK1NH3 type as described in WO 2014/206561. In this process, which is schematically shown in
In addition, a second graft was designed, which included additional amino acids modifications from the rabbit donor on the positions L15, L22, L48, L57, L74, L87, L88, L90, L92, L95, L97, L99 and H24, H25, H56, H82, H84, H89, H108 (AHo numbering), which have been described to potentially influence CDR positioning and thus antigen binding (Borras et al. JBC. 2010; 285:9054-9066). These humanized construct is termed “structural (STR) graft”. In case the comparison of the characterization data for these two initial constructs revealed a significant advantage of the STR construct additional variants were designed that combined the CDR grafted VL with STR grafted VH. This combination has been proven to be often sufficient to retain the activity of the STR graft (Borras et al., 2010, JBC, 285:9054-9066) and would generally be preferred as fewer non-human alterations in the human acceptor scaffold reduce the risk for impaired stability and also the potential for immunogenicity.
Once the in-silico construct design described in the previous section was completed the corresponding genes were synthesized and bacterial expression vectors were constructed. The sequence of the expression constructs was confirmed on the level of the DNA and the constructs were manufactured according to generic expression and purification protocols.
The heterologous expression of the proteins was performed in E. coli as insoluble inclusion bodies. The expression culture was inoculated with an exponentially growing starting culture. The cultivation was performed in shake flasks in an orbital shaker using commercially available rich media. The cells were grown to a defined OD600 of 2 and induced by overnight expression with 1 mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). At the end of fermentation the cells were harvested by centrifugation and homogenized by sonication. At this point the expression level of the different constructs was determined by SDS-PAGE analysis of the cell lysate. The inclusion bodies were isolated from the homogenized cell pellet by a centrifugation protocol that included several washing steps to remove cell debris and other host cell impurities. The purified inclusion bodies were solubilized in a denaturing buffer (100 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 6 M Gdn-HCl, 2 mM EDTA) and the scFvs were refolded by a scalable refolding protocol that generated milligram amounts of natively folded, monomeric scFv. A standardized protocol was employed to purify the scFvs, which included the following steps. The product after refolding was captured by an affinity chromatography employing Capto L agarose (GE Healthcare) to yield the purified scFvs. Lead candidates that met the affinity and potency criteria in initial testing were further purified by a polishing size-exclusion chromatography using a HiLoad Superdex75 column (GE Healthcare). Subsequent to the purification protocol the proteins were formulated in a buffered saline solution and characterized by the various biophysical, protein interaction and biological methods, as described in the following. The producibility of the different constructs was compared by determining the final yield of purified protein for the batch and normalizing this value to 1 L of refolding volume.
1.2.2 Biophysical Characterization of Humanized scFv
The biophysical characterization of the scFv with respect to stability and producibility were compiled in Table 5. The producibility and stability of the scFv construct was characterized by the different reporting points as discussed in the subsequent sections.
The scFv was investigated as to certain criteria, as explained in the following.
The producibility criterion shall ensure that the selected scFv entity can be expressed, refolded and purified in sufficient amounts to support later development of the lead molecule. The defined criteria were the expression yield of scFv per liter of fermentation broth, as assessed by SDS-PAGE, and the purification yield achieved in the generic lab-scale process, as assessed by measurement of the amount of purified protein by UV spectrometry, calculated back to 1 liter of refolding solution.
The criteria for stability were intended to assess the aggregation propensity during the manufacturing process of the molecules and their structural integrity during storage and further handling. The monomer content determined by SE-HPLC allows assessing the colloidal stability of molecules during the purification process (2.2.3). In a subsequent stability study the monomer content was tested over a duration of 4 weeks at 1 and 10 mg/mL and storage at 4, −20 and <−65° C. In addition, the colloidal stability of the proteins was tested after 5 freezing and thawing cycles. As an additional stability indicating parameter, the midpoint of thermal unfolding was determined by differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) (2.2.4) to provide a read-out for the conformational stability of the lead candidates.
1.2.2.1 Producibility Assessment
The lead candidate scFv molecules were expressed by shake flask fermentation in batch mode and purified by a generic lab-scale process to yield the protein samples for further characterization. During this process some key performance parameters were monitored to compare the candidate molecules and to identify potentially difficult to develop constructs.
The expression titer was determined on the level of the crude E. coli lysate after the harvest of the cells by centrifugation. During the harvest a small loss of cells is anticipated, however, this factor was chosen to be neglected for the calculation of the expression yield in favor of a more conservative estimation of the productivity. For the quantification of the scFv product in the lysate coomassie stained reducing SDS-PAGE (2.2.1) was chosen due to the high specificity of the method that allows discriminating the product from the host cell proteins in the sample.
A second criterion to assess the producibility is the purification yield of scFv calculated per liter of refolding solution. This parameter addresses the potential bottleneck in the anticipated manufacturing process that includes a protein refolding step. Since the efficiency of the refolding procedure has proven to be limiting in comparable manufacturing processes it has been decided to compare the performance of the different constructs with respect to the producibility normalized to a defined refolding volume. For the calculation of the yield the final protein sample from each batch was quantified by UV absorbance (2.2.2) and divided by the actual refolding volume of the respective purification (Table 6).
1.2.2.2 Stability Assessment
The assessment of the conformational stability, monodispersity and structural integrity of the scFv constructs is an integral component for the ranking of the different molecules with respect to the developability. A prerequisite for the meaningful comparison of the different constructs is the preparation of purified molecules of similar quality. The criterion “monomer purity” determined by SE-HPLC is intended to ensure compatible quality of the different test substances. In addition to the SE-HPLC analysis, SDS-PAGE for the determination of protein purity and identity was performed to confirm comparable quality of the tested preparations. The SE-HPLC results of the two scFvs reveal that all preparations could be purified to a monomer content of z 99% (
The thermal unfolding behavior of the lead candidates was tested by differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) to allow ranking of the molecules with respect to their expected conformational stability. A normalized plot of the fluorescence raw data is shown in
In a second arm of the stability assessment the monodispersity of the molecules was monitored over the duration of 4 weeks at different temperatures. The results for the stability study and the resulting monomer contents are shown in
A SDS-PAGE analysis was performed for the two scFvs to generate supportive data for the quantification by UV absorbance, confirming the purity of the sample preparation and thereby conferring specificity for the content quantification. In another aspect of this analysis the SDS-PAGE results revealed the absence of protein degradation during the stability study (28 days at 4° C. and a concentration of 10 mg/ml compared to sample from day 0 stored at <−65° C.), which is an important characteristic from a developability perspective.
It is important to note that the different studies performed within the scope of this assessment address distinct mechanistic aspects of protein stability. The determination of the thermal unfolding temperature of a protein will give complementary results to the measurement of the monodispersity by SE-HPLC upon storage at elevated temperature. While both methods are designed to give an estimation of the potential product shelf live and stability the mechanisms addressed are profoundly different. The midpoint of transition (Tm) assessed by thermal unfolding is a qualitative measure for protein domain stability (does not allow for thermodynamic determination of ΔG). Highly stable protein domains (high Tm) are less likely to spontaneously unfold at ambient temperature and thus less prone to irreversible aggregation/precipitation driven by unfolded domain interactions. High domain stability indicates dense packaging of amino acid residues, which also correlates with resistance towards protease cleavage. The SE-HPLC assessment on the other hand quantitatively determines the content of the monomeric fraction as well as of soluble oligomers/aggregates. Such soluble oligomers are oftentimes reversible and relatively loose associations driven by electrostatic or hydrophobic interactions between correctly folded proteins. There is some correlation between Tm as assessed by thermal unfolding and the propensity for oligomer/aggregate formation as assessed by SE-HPLC particularly for proteins with “border line” stability. Beyond a certain threshold Tm of approximately 60° C. antibody variable domains are generally sufficiently stable to be resistant toward aggregation/precipitation and proteolytic degradation due to partial domain unfolding at ambient temperature. Oligomerization driven by hydrophobic and/or electrostatic interactions of surface residues may, however, still occur. Importantly, in an accelerated (stress) stability study at elevated temperature (e.g. 37° C.) the various mechanisms of oligomer formation and precipitation may occur simultaneously.
1.2.3 Characterization of In Vitro Binding and Activity of Humanized scFvs
In the following the humanized scFvs were characterized in vitro for their target binding properties and potencies. Binding kinetics (ka, kd and KD) to human TNFα and potency to neutralize TNFα-induced apoptosis of L929 fibroblasts was analyzed. Additionally, the potency to inhibit Cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) and Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) TNFα induced apoptosis as well as the potency to inhibit the interaction between human TNFα and TNFRI/TNFRII by ELISA and target selectivity for binding to TNFα over TNFβ was determined.
For the understanding of the results below it is important to note that both, the transfer of the rabbit CDRs onto a human variable domain scaffold as well as the change in the format from the full-size IgG to the scFv fragment may impact on pharmacological properties. For example, a certain loss of affinity is usually associated with humanization. Further, due to the smaller size of the scFv compared to the IgG the ability of a scFv to interfere with interaction partners through steric hindrance is largely reduced. Last but not least it shall be noted that due to its bivalent mode of binding to the homo-trimeric TNFα, the affinity of the parent IgG may have been reported too high (SPR artifact). Consequently, when comparing affinities between the parental bivalent rabbit IgG and the humanized monovalent scFv, the reported “loss in affinity” may be overestimated.
1.2.3.1 Affinity
Affinity of humanized scFvs to human TNFα was determined by SPR measurements (see also 2.1.1). Affinity was determined using 2-fold serial dilutions of the respective scFvs. The scFvs were derived from a rabbit monoclonal antibody. Two scFv variants were generated, named “CDR” (CDR) and “structural graft” (STR). To assess the relative contribution of framework substitutions in the light and the heavy chain and to possibly reduce the number of rabbit amino acid residues introduced in the human framework, domain shuffling experiments were performed. Therefore, scFv constructs containing a CDR grafted light chain and a structural grafted heavy chain (CDR/STR) were generated for clone 16-22-H05.
The top ranking scFvs 16-22-H05-sc02 (STR) and 16-22-H05-sc04 (CDR/STR) bound with affinities of 4.5×10−11 and 1.1×10−10 M, respectively. 16-22-H05-sc04 showed only a slight reduction of affinity when compared to its “structural graft” variant (16-22-H04-sc02) (see Table 7). These results suggest that affinity of the humanized scFvs mainly depends on the few rabbit amino acids introduced into the human heavy chain framework.
1.2.3.2 Potency
The ability of the humanized scFvs to neutralize human TNFα was analyzed using the L929 assay (see also 2.1.2). The potency (IC50 and IC90) to neutralize TNFα induced apoptosis was analyzed for 16-22-H5 derived scFvs and compared to the potency of the reference antibody infliximab to allow for direct comparison of IC50 and IC90 values from different assay plates. Relative IC50 and IC90 values were calculated in mass units (ng/ml) of infliximab and the scFvs. Potency analysis was performed several times on different days with different lots of antibody fragments.
The humanized scFvs inhibited TNFα induced apoptosis with lower IC50 and IC90 values than infliximab (see Table 7). Consistent with SPR results, the domain shuffled variant 16-22-H05-sc04 (CDR/STR) exhibited equal potency when compared to the structural graft 16-22-H05-sc02 (STR). The scFvs 16-22-H05-sc04 and 16-22-H05-sc02 showed excellent TNFα-neutralizing activities, with IC50 values of 14.6- and 13.1-fold better than infliximab, respectively. IC90 values of 16-22-H05-sc04 and 16-22-H05-sc02 were 13.1- and 12.6-fold better than for infliximab, respectively. As observed for the parental rabbit monoclonal antibodies there was no clear correlation between affinity and potency of antibodies (correlation not shown). Nevertheless, scFv derived from 16-22-H05 showing the highest affinities (16-22-H05-sc02 (STR) and 16-22-H05-sc04 (CDR/STR)) also showed highest potency. Additionally, results from the neutralization assays suggest that a certain threshold affinity needs to be achieved for efficient inhibition of TNFα signaling. For example, scFvs 16-14-D08-sc01 (CDR), 16-15-C09-sc01 (CDR), 16-24-H07-sc01 (CDR) and 17-20-G01-sc01 (CDR), all binding to TNFα with affinities above 1 nM, show poor potential to neutralize TNFα (not shown).
1.2.3.3 Species Cross-Reactivity (Cynomolgus and Rhesus Monkey TNFα)
Species cross-reactivity for the top ranking scFvs was determined by two methods: 1) potency to neutralize Cynomolgus monkey and Rhesus monkey TNFα in the L929 assay and 2) affinity to Cynomolgus monkey and Rhesus monkey TNFα by SPR. The potency to neutralize TNFα from the different species was determined by the L929 assay similarly as described above for human TNFα using Cynomolgus monkey and Rhesus monkey TNFα, respectively (see also 2.1.2). TNFα from both species showed very similar potency to induce L929 apoptosis (data not shown). Therefore, same concentrations of human and monkey TNFα were used for species cross-reactivity testing. Additionally, binding kinetics (by SPR) to Cynomolgus monkey and Rhesus monkey TNFα were determined using a similar assay as for human TNFα (see also 2.1.1).
All scFvs derived from the clone 16-22-H05 showed cross-reactivity to Cynomolgus monkey and Rhesus monkey TNFα (see Table 7). The affinities were similar, namely 2.0×10−10 and 2.3×10−10 M for Cynomolgus monkey and Rhesus monkey, respectively. The difference in affinity between human and monkey TNFα was about 5-fold. Potencies to neutralize Cynomolgus monkey, Rhesus monkey and human TNFα correlated well with the affinities to the respective TNFαs. Consequently the two clones derived from 16-22-H05 showed between 5- to 7-fold lower potencies towards monkey TNFα as compared to human TNFα (see Table 7 and
1.2.3.4 Blocking of the Human TNFα-TNFRI/II Interaction
In addition to the L929 assay, the potency of each humanized scFv to inhibit the interaction between human TNFα and TNFRI/II was assessed by ELISA (see 2.1.3). Similarly to the L929 assay, individual IC50 values on each plate were calibrated against the IC50 of the reference molecule infliximab that was taken along on each plate and relative IC50 and IC90 values were calculated in mass units (ng/ml) of Infliximab and the scFvs.
Neutralization assays can distinguish potencies of target blocking antibodies only if they bind their target with an equilibrium binding constant (KD) that is higher than the target concentration used in the potency assay (KD>target concentration). For the L929 assay a TNFα concentration of 5 pM was used while in the TNFRI/II inhibition ELISAs a TNFα concentration of 960 pM was used. Therefore, theoretically, the L929 assay can differentiate potencies between scFvs with KD>5 pM, while the inhibition ELISA can only differentiate potencies between scFvs with KD>960 pM. Since all of the scFvs analyzed showed KDs below 960 pM, potencies between scFvs with different affinities (but similar mechanism of action) can be differentiated only in the L929 assay.
16-22-H5-sc02 and 16-22-05-sc04 showed potencies for blocking of the TNFα-TNFRI interaction between 2.8 and 3.5-fold higher compared to infliximab while the potency compared to infliximab in the L929 assay was significantly higher (13.1 and 14.6-fold). When comparing the relative IC50 values for the parental rabbit IgG (see Table 2) with the relative IC50 values for the humanized scFvs (Table 7) potencies of the scFvs are in general slightly higher compared to the parental IgG although affinities in general are in the same range for the parental rabbit IgG. Since potencies of antibodies and scFvs were compared in mass units, the number of valencies (TNFα binding sites) at each concentration is about 2.9-fold higher for the monovalent scFvs compared to the more than five-fold heavier but bivalent IgG. With very high-affinity binding scFvs, this results in more potent blocking of the TNFα and TNFRI/II interaction because the lack of avidity is no longer critical for activity. In contrast, with low-affinity monovalent domains the opposite has been published (Coppieters et al. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2006; 54:1856-1866). For the reasons mentioned above, results from the inhibition ELISA were not used for ranking of potencies between the different antibodies but primarily for comparison of the potential of antibodies to block the interaction with TNFRI versus TNFRII. The investigated scFvs blocked the interaction between both TNFα receptors with comparable potencies (Table 9,
1.2.3.5 Target Specificity (Selectivity for Binding to TNFα Versus TNFβ)
Specificity of the two scFvs (16-22-H05-sc02 and 16-22-H05-sc04) for TNFα over TNFβ was confirmed by assessment of the relative potential of TNFβ as compared to TNFα to half-maximally inhibit TNFα binding to each scFv and was measured in a competition ELISA (see also 2.1.4). The quality of recombinant human TNFβ has been analyzed 1) for purity by SDS-page and HPLC analysis, and 2) for biological activity in the mouse L929 cytotoxicity assay, by the manufacturer of the protein. As shown in
The results of the experiments described above are summarized in tables 7 to 9.
&IC90,Infliximab (ng/mL)/IC90,scFv (ng/mL)
&IC90,Infliximab (ng/mL)/IC90,scFv (ng/mL)
2.1 Lead Characterization Assays
2.1.1 Binding Kinetics and Species Cross-Reactivity by SPR Binding affinities of scFvs towards human TNFα were measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) using a MASS-1 SPR instrument (Sierra Sensors). Performance of the SPR assay was qualified by analysis of a reference antibody antigen interaction such as certolizumab-TNFα interaction. The pegylated Fab-fragment certolizumab was selected as reference due to its monovalent binding mode similar to that of scFvs. Using the same assay setup as for affinity measurements of the scFvs, a value of 9.94×10−11 M was determined for the affinity of certolizumab to TNFα. This value is in good agreement with published KD values of 9.02±1.43×10−11 M (BLA certolizumab; BLA number: 125160; submission date: Apr. 30, 2007).
For affinity measurements of scFvs human TNFα (Peprotech, Cat. No. 300-01) was immobilized on a sensor chip (SPR-2 Affinity Sensor, Amine, Sierra Sensors) by amine-coupling to reach an immobilization level of 50 to 100 RUs (immobilization levels achieved during SPR analysis were between 40 to 120 RUs). In a first step, affinity screening of scFvs was performed using only one scFv concentration (90 nM). In a second step, for the best performing scFvs, Single Injection Cycle Kinetics (SiCK) were measured from a single injection cycle by simultaneously injecting six analyte samples at different concentrations into each of the eight parallel channels in the MASS-1 system. For affinity screenings, humanized scFvs were injected into the flow cells at a concentration of 90 nM for three minutes and dissociation was monitored for 12 minutes. For the subsequent more precise affinity determinations, two-fold serial dilutions of scFv ranging from 45 to 1.4 nM were injected into the flow cells for three minutes and dissociation of the protein from TNFα immobilized on the sensor chip was allowed to proceed for 12 minutes. The apparent dissociation (kd) and association (ka) rate constants and the apparent dissociation equilibrium constant (KD) were calculated with the MASS-1 analysis software (Analyzer, Sierra Sensors) using one-to-one Langmuir binding model and quality of the fits was monitored based on Chi2, which is a measure for the quality of the curve fitting. The smaller the value for the Chi2 the more accurate is the fitting to the one-to-one Langmuir binding model. For affinity screenings, results were deemed valid if the Chi2 was below 10 for the concentration analyzed. In cases where several scFv concentrations were analyzed, results were deemed valid if the average Chi2 over all the concentrations tested was below 10. Acceptance criteria were met for all scFvs tested.
Species cross-reactivity to Cynomolgus monkey (Sino Biological, Cat. No. 90018-CNAE) and Rhesus monkey (R&D Systems, Cat. No. 1070-RM-025/CF) TNFα (Peprotech, Cat. No. 315-01A) was measured using the same assay setup and applying the same quality measures as described above for human TNFα. For Cynomolgus and Rhesus monkey TNFα immobilization levels ranging from 50 to 180 RUs and from 90 to 250 RUs, respectively, were achieved. The scFvs were analyzed using two-fold serial dilutions with concentrations ranging from 45 to 1.4 nM. The average Chi2 values were below 10 for all of the scFvs tested.
2.1.2 TNFα-Induced Apoptosis in L929 Fibroblasts (Neutralization of Human, Non-Human Primate and TNFα by scFvs)
The ability of scFvs to neutralize the biological activity of recombinant human TNFα was assessed using mouse L929 fibroblasts (ATCC/LGC Standards, Cat. No. CCL-1). L929 cells were sensitized to TNFα-induced apoptosis by addition of 1 μg/ml actinomycin D. Three-fold serial dilutions of anti-TNFα reference antibody or scFvs (3000-0.05 ng/ml) and 5 pM recombinant human TNFα (Peprotech, Cat. No. 300-01) were pre-incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. The used TNFα concentration (5 pM) induces submaximal L929 apoptosis (EC90). After addition of the agonist/inhibitor mixtures the cells were incubated for 24 hours. Survival of the cells was determined by a colorimetric assay using the WST-8 (2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt) cell proliferation reagent (Sigma Aldrich, Cat. No. 96992). WST-8 is reduced by cellular dehydrogenases to an orange formazan product. The amount of formazan produced is directly proportional to the number of living cells. Data were analyzed using a four-parameter logistic curve fit using the Softmax Data Analysis Software (Molecular Devices), and the concentration of reference antibody or scFvs required to neutralize TNFα-induced apoptosis by 50% and 90% (IC50 and IC90) was calculated (see also
Standard deviations and CVs were calculated for each measurement point (CV<20%). Species cross-reactivity to Cynomolgus monkey (Sino Biological, Cat. No. 90018-CNAE) and Rhesus monkey (R&D Systems, Cat. No. 1070-RM-025/CF) TNFα was measured using the same assay setup and applying the same quality measures as described above for human TNFα. Similarly to the human counterpart, TNFα concentrations that induce submaximal L929 apoptosis (EC90) were used for species cross-reactivity testing. TNFα from both species showed very similar potency to human TNFα to induce L929 mouse fibroblast apoptosis. Consequently the same concentration of TNFα (5 pM) was used for oth species tested. During species cross-reactivity testing CVs of most of the duplicate measurement points were below 10%.
2.1.3 TNFα Inhibition ELISA
The inhibitory effect of scFvs on ligand binding was assessed using an ELISA, a biochemical method solely reproducing the interaction between TNFα and TNFRI and TNFRII.
For the first inhibition ELISA, the extracellular domain of TNFRI fused to the Fc region of human IgG (R&D Systems, Cat. No. 372-RI) was coated on a 96-well Maxisorp ELISA at a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml. For the second inhibition ELISA, the extracellular domain of TNFRII fused to the Fc region of human IgG (R&D Systems, Cat. No. 726-R2) was coated at a concentration of 2 μg/ml. All subsequent steps were identical for both assays. In order to detect binding of TNFα to TNFRI and TNFRII, TNFα was biotinylated prior to its use. Biotinylated human TNFα (960 pM, 50 ng/ml) was first incubated with 3-fold serially diluted humanized anti-TNFα scFvs and infliximab (10′000 ng/ml-0.2 ng/ml) for 1 hour at room temperature. The TNFα/antibody fragment mixtures were transferred to the TNF receptor immobilized plates and binding of unblocked TNFα to the immobilized TNFα receptor was detected after incubation at room temperature for 20 minutes with the biotin-binding streptavidin-HRP (SDT Reagents, Cat. No. SP40C). Addition of 3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate resulted in a colorimetric read-out that was proportional to the binding of TNFα to TNFRI and TNFRII. Before use in the competition ELISA, the biological activity of the biotinylated TNFα was confirmed in the L929 assay. The EC50 of biotinylated TNFα was similar to the EC50 of unlabeled TNFα (data not shown). Similar to the L929 assay described above, data were analyzed using a four-parameter logistic curve fit using the Softmax Data Analysis Software (Molecular Devices), and the concentration of scFvs required to inhibit interaction of TNFα and TNFR by 50% and 90% (IC50 and IC90) was calculated. In order to render IC50 and IC90 values directly comparable between experiments that were performed on different days or on different assay plates, IC50 and IC90 values were calibrated against the reference antibody infliximab.
To control precision of the response, the dose-response curves were analyzed in duplicate. Standard deviations and CVs were calculated for each measurement point (CV<25%).
2.1.4 Target Specificity
To confirm specificity of the anti-TNFα scFvs, binding to the most homologous family member TNFβ was assessed. The potential to inhibit the interaction of biotinylated TNFα with scFvs by unlabeled TNFβ (Peprotech, Cat. No. 300-01B) and TNFα (Peprotech, Cat. No. 300-01) was analyzed by competition ELISA. For this purpose, the scFvs were coated on a 96-well Maxisorp ELISA plate at a concentration of 1 μg/ml. Binding of biotinylated TNFα (75 ng/ml) to the coated scFvs in presence of 5-fold serially diluted unlabeled TNFα (50 μg/ml-0.00013 μg/ml) or TNFβ (1250 μg/ml-0.00013 μg/ml) was detected using the biotin-binding streptavidin-HRP (SDT Reagents, Cat. No. SP40C) as described above. For the dose-response curve with TNFα data were analyzed using a four-parameter logistic curve fit using the Softmax Data Analysis Software (Molecular Devices), and the concentration of unlabeled TNFα required to block the interaction of biotinylated TNFα with the coated scFv by 50% (IC50) was calculated. TNFβ did not show any significant inhibition of the interaction between biotinylated TNFα and scFvs (see also
2.1 CMC Analytics
2.2.1 Reducing SDS-PAGE
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is an analysis technique used for qualitative characterization and to control purity of proteins. According to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) (USP Chapter 1056) analytical gel electrophoresis is an appropriate and routine method to identify and to assess the homogeneity of proteins in drug substances.
The method is used to quantify the amount of scFv product from E. coli lysates to derive the expression yield after fermentation. Another application of the method is to verify the identity of test substances based on their molecular weight with respect to the theoretical values. For supportive purposes this method is used to quantify the purity of test samples with respect to process-related impurities (host cell proteins) and product related impurities (degradation products or adducts).
The SDS-PAGE analyses were performed with commercially available precast gel system “Mini Protean” obtained from Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. Humanized scFvs were analyzed on “Any kD” resolving gels (#456-9036). In both cases the Tris/Glycine buffer system recommended by the manufacturer was used. For the detection of protein bands either coomassie staining with SimplyBlue™ staining solution (Life Technologies Corp., #LC6060) or silver staining with the Pierce Silver Stain Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., #24612) was employed. For the staining procedures the protocols of the respective supplier were followed.
The documentation and analysis of the stained protein gels was performed with the documentation system ChemiDoc XRS System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., #170-8265) and software Image Lab, Version 4.0.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., #170-9690).
Titer Determination of Lysate Samples
SDS-PAGE allows for specific detection of the protein of interest in the mixture of host cell proteins. A reference standard dilution series in the linear range of the method (which was determined in advance) was included on every gel. A linear regression of band intensities (measured by densitometry) versus nominal concentrations of the reference standard were used to calculate a standard curve, which in turn, was used to extrapolate scFv content in the sample.
The lysate samples of unknown product concentrations were loaded in different dilutions (at least 1:10 in dilution buffer) to have at least one scFv concentration in the linear range of the method. The product amount was calculated based on the measured band intensities of the scFv and the concentration was determined using the dilution factors of the sample preparation. The values were averaged for all samples that were within the linear range of the standard curve.
As an additional test of the suitability of the method for the quantification of lysate sample an inhibition/enhancement test was performed by spiking a lysate sample with a known amount of reference standard. Calculation of the spike recovery at a sample dilution of 1:10 in dilution buffer resulted in a value of 95.4% which is at the same level of precision as observed with the reference standard in dilution buffer. Thus, no significant matrix interference in cell lysates was observed and the method was deemed suitable for the quantification of scFv content in cell lysates.
Protein Purity and Content
To show the suitability of the method to determine the content and thereby also the purity of test samples, the lower limit of detection (LOD) for a reference scFv was determined visually (by identifying the protein band) at a nominal load of 0.02 μg, the evaluation of the intensity histogram of the respective lane shows a signal-to-noise ratio at this load of approximately 2. In addition, the linear range for the quantification was determined by analyzing the main bands densitometrically.
The fit of the data with a linear regression, results in a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9998, thus indicating a good quality of the fit. In addition to the overall quality of the fit the relative error of each individual data point was determined to document the suitability of the method in the chosen range. The relative errors are below 10% for all data points indicating good accuracy of this method.
2.2.2 UV Absorbance at 280 nm
The method UV absorbance at 280 nm is a total protein assay as outlined in USP Chapter 1057. Protein solutions absorb UV light at a wavelength of 280 nm due to the presence of aromatic amino acids. The UV absorbance is a function of the content of tyrosine and tryptophan residues in the protein and is proportional to the protein concentration. The absorbance of an unknown protein solution can be determined according to USP Chapter 851 on spectroscopy by applying Beer's law: A=ε*|*c, where the absorbance (A) is equal to the product of the molar absorptivity (E), the absorption path length and the concentration of the substance. The molar absorptivity for the scFv was calculated with the software Vector NTI® (Life Technologies Corporation).
The measurement of the UV absorbance was performed with the Infinity reader M200 Pro equipped with Nanoquant plate (Tecan Group Ltd.). The absorbance of the protein samples were measured at 280 nm and 310 nm, where the latter wavelength was serving as a reference signal that was subtracted from the 280 nm signal. To account for potential interference of the sample matrix a blank subtraction was performed for each measurement. The final absorbance signal of a protein sample obtained was used to calculate the protein concentration using Lambert-Beer's law.
All measurements were performed within the range given by the instruments specifications in the measurement range of 0-4 OD, where a reproducibility of <1% and a uniformity of <3% is specified by the manufacturer.
2.2.3 SE-HPLC (Size Exclusion High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography)
SE-HPLC is a separation technique based on a solid stationary phase and a liquid mobile phase as outlined by the USP chapter 621. This method separates molecules based on their size and shape utilizing a hydrophobic stationary phase and aqueous mobile phase. The separation of molecules is occurring between the void volume (V0) and the total permeation volume (VT) of a specific column. Measurements by SE-HPLC were performed on a Chromaster HPLC system (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) equipped with automated sample injection and a UV detector set to the detection wavelength of 280 nm. The equipment is controlled by the software EZChrom Elite (Agilent Technologies, Version 3.3.2 SP2) which also supports analysis of resulting chromatograms. Protein samples were cleared by centrifugation and kept at a temperature of 6° C. in the autosampler prior to injection. For the analysis of scFv samples the column Shodex KW402.5-4F (Showa Denko Inc., #F6989201) was employed with a standardized buffered saline mobile phase (50 mM Sodium acetate pH 6.0, 250 mM sodium chloride) at the recommended flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. The target sample load per injection was 5 μg. Samples were detected by an UV detector at a wavelength of 280 nm and the data recorded by a suitable software suite. The resulting chromatograms were analyzed in the range of V0 to VT thereby excluding matrix associated peaks with >10 min elution time.
To ensure intermediate precision of the method, a reference standard was routinely measured at the beginning and end of each HPLC sequence. The reference standard used for this system suitability test was a scFv that had been produced as a batch and was aliquoted to be used for each measurement timepoint.
2.2.4 DSF (Differential Scanning Fluorimetry)
The method DSF is a non-compendial method to measure temperature-dependent protein unfolding. The measurement of the thermal unfolding temperature by DSF were performed with a MX3005P qPCR machine (Agilent Technologies) controlled with the MX Pro software package (Agilent Technologies) and equipped with an excitation/emission filter set at 492/610 nm. The reactions were set-up in Thermo fast 96 white PCR plates (Abgene; #AB-0600/W). For the detection of protein unfolding a commercially available stock solution of the dye SYPRO orange (Molecular Probes; #S6650) was used at a final dilution of 1:1′000. The protein samples were diluted for the unfolding measurements to a final concentration of 50 μg/mL in a standardized buffered saline solution. The thermal unfolding was performed by a temperature program starting at 25° C. ramping up to 96° C. in 1° C. steps with a duration of 30 seconds. During the temperature program the fluorescence emission of each sample was recorded. The recorded raw data was processed and evaluated with a package of Microsoft Excel templates (Niesen, Nature Protocols 2007, Vol. 2 No. 9) and the fluorescence data was fitted with a Boltzmann equation using the program GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc.) to obtain the midpoint of transition (Tm).
In order to produce reliable and robust measurements of the midpoint of unfolding at least duplicate measurements were performed. With respect to the data quality only measurements with a goodness of fit (R2)>0.9900 and a 95% confidence interval of the Tm of smaller than 0.5% were considered.
For an assessment of the intermediate precision a reference standard (known characterized scFv) was included with every measurement to allow for comparison of assay performance on different days.
2.2.5 Stability Study
In order to assess the stability of different scFv constructs as a read-out for the developability of these molecules a short-term stability study protocol was designed. The protein constructs were concentrated in a simple buffered saline formulation (see above) to the target concentrations of 1 and 10 mg/mL. The monomer content was determined by SE-HPLC to confirm that the purity is exceeding the success criteria of >95%. Subsequently the protein samples were stored at <−65, −20, 4 and 37° C. for the duration of 4 weeks and aliquots were analyzed at various time points. The primary read-out is the analysis by SE-HPLC, which allows the quantification of soluble higher molecular weight oligomers and aggregates. As supportive measurements the protein content is determined by UV absorbance at 280 nm, which gives an indication whether during the storage period substantial amounts of protein were lost by precipitation. For the storage screw cap tubes were used (Sarstedt, Cat. No. 72.692.005) with filling amounts of 30-1500 μg per aliquot. Additionally purity is determined by SDS-PAGE that indicates the stability of the construct with respect to degradation or covalent multimerization.
The single-chain diabody construct was designed by arranging the variable domains in a VLA-L1-VHB-L2-VLB-L3-VHA configuration. In these constructs the VLA and VHA and VLB and VHB domains jointly form the binding site for TNFα. The peptide linkers L1-L3 connecting the variable domains were constructed of glycine/serine repeats. The two short linkers L1 and L3 are composed of a single G4S repeat, whereas the long linker L2 is composed of the sequence (G4S)4. The nucleotide sequences encoding the humanized variable domains (Example 2; 1.2.1) were de novo synthesized and cloned into an adapted vector for E. coli expression that is based on a pET26b(+) backbone (Novagen). The expression and purification was performed as described for the scFvs in Example 2; 1.2.1.
The humanized IgG was constructed by cloning the variable domains a suitable mammalian expression vector for transient heterologous expression containing a leader sequence and the respective constant domains e.g. the pFUSE-rIgG vectors (Invivogen). The transient expression of the functional IgG was performed by co-transfection of vectors encoding the heavy and light chains with the FreeStyle™ MAX system in CHO S cells. After cultivation for several days the supernatant of the antibody secreting cells was recovered for purification. Subsequently the secreted IgGs were affinity purified by Protein A sepharose (GE Healthcare). The elution fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, UV absorbance at 280 nm and SE-HPLC.
The affinities of the antibody molecules were determined using a Biacore instrument as described in Example 2 under 2.1.1).
The potencies of the antibody molecules were determined in an L929 assay (the method is described in Example 2 under 2.1.2).
The binding stoichiometry of 16-22-H5 to TNFα was determined using SE-HPLC. 16-22-H5-scFv and TNFα were incubated at two different molar ratios, namely at a 1:1 and 4.5:1 molar ratio. Since TNFα exists as a trimer in solution the indicated molar ratios refer to the TNFαtrimer. Thus, in the 4.5:1 ratio the 16-22-H5-scFv is in excess and should occupy all TNFαtrimer binding positions resulting in complexes of 1 TNFαtrimer with 3 scFv. However, under equimolar conditions there is not enough scFv present to saturate all 3 theoretical TNFα binding sites. Therefore, also complex variants with less than 3 scFv bound are expected. TNFα and 16-22-H5-scFv were incubated for 2 hours at RT to allow for complex formation. Samples were then centrifuged at 4° C. for 10 min. 10 μL of each sample were analysed on SE-HPLC. The SE-HPLC analysis was performed with 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5, 300 mM NaCl as eluent at a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. Eluted protein peaks were detected at a wavelength of 280 nm. The column was calibrated using the Gel filtration Calibration Kit from GE Healthcare (LMW, HMW) in advance for the determination of apparent molecular weights.
The bottom panel of
Further to these qualitative observations, the apparent binding stoichiometry was also calculated based on the apparent MW of the 16-22-H5-scFv:TNFα complex as determined by SE-HPLC. Based on retention time, the apparent MW was calculated to be 139.7 kDa. According to equation (1) below the apparent binding stoichiometry was calculated to be 3.3. This correlates well with the theoretical number of three equivalent binding sites available for scFv on the TNFαtrimer and the observations above where a 3:1 binding stoichiometry was determined.
The ability of the 16-22-H5-scDb to bind simultaneously to two TNFα molecules was tested on a Biacore T200 instrument in HEPES buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% Tween. Biotinylated TNFα (Acro Biosystems) was captured via a biotinylated ssDNA oligo using the Biotin CAPture kit (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 0.25 μg/mL of biotinylated TNFα were injected with a flow rate of 10 μL/min for 3 min to reach a capture level of approximately 200 to 300 RUs (resonance units). The antibodies 16-22-H5-scDb and 16-22-H5-scFv, as a control, were injected over the TNFα immobilized surface for 2 min at a flow rate of 30 μL/min at a concentration of 90 nM. Following association of the antibody fragments, TNFα (Peprotech) was injected for 5 min with a flow rate of 30 μL/min at 90 nM. The antibody and TNFα concentrations were selected close to saturation of the binding. The measurement was performed at 25° C.
Further, the formation of TNFα-antibody complexes was assessed at different ratios of TNFα and 16-22-H5 antibody formats using SE-HPLC. 16-22-H5-IgG (150 kDa) and 16-22-H5-scDb (52 kDa) were incubated with TNFα (52 kDa) at different molar ratios (1:3, 1:1, 3:1) in respect to binding sites. Thus, IgG and scDb have 2 and TNFα has 3 binding sites. The antibody-TNFα mixtures were incubated for at least 30 min at 37° C., cooled down for 10 min at RT and stored overnight at 2-8° C. Five to 10 uL of protein mixture at a concentration of approx. 1 mg/mL were injected onto a TOSHO TSKgel UP-SW3000 column. The analysis was performed with 150 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 100 mM NaCl as eluent at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Eluted protein peaks were detected at a wavelength of 214 nm. The column was calibrated using the BEH450 SEC protein standard mix (Waters) in advance for the determination of the approximate molecular weights of the complexes.
The capacity of different antibody formats of 16-22-H5 and adalimumab to inhibit the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was tested in a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). PBMC from 2 healthy donors were cultured (RPM11640) in a 1:1 ratio in 96-well plates for 48 h at 37° C./5% CO2. After activation, cells were treated with anti-TNFα antibodies or IgG control antibody (all at a final concentration of 10 μg/mL) in sextuplicates for another 5 d at 37° C./5% CO2. 24 h before the end of incubation BrdU (20 uL/well) was added to each well and proliferation was determined by measuring BrdU uptake using a commercially available cell proliferation ELISA (Roche Diagnostics). The stimulation index was determined by calculating the ratio of BrdU uptake between the antibody treated cells and mitomycin C (25 ng/mL) treated cells. Table 12 and
CD14+ monocytes in RPM11640 were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated for 16 h at 37° C./5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Then cells were treated with anti-TNFα antibodies or IgG control antibody in duplicates for 1 h using final antibody concentrations ranging from 2 to 2000 ng/mL. The monocytes were washed 3 times with cell culture medium and subsequently incubated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 4 h at 37° C./5% CO2. IL-1β and TNFα concentrations in the cell culture supernatants were determined using commercially available ELISA kits (R&D Systems). The Results are shown in Tables 13 and 14 and
As regards TNFα secretion, the determined IC50 values for 16-22-H5-IgG, 16-22-H5-scDb, 16-22-H5-scFv are summarized in Table 14.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16160907 | Mar 2016 | EP | regional |
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/085,506 filed Sep. 14, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,459,383 issued Oct. 4, 2022, which, in turn, corresponds to the U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2017/056237, filed Mar. 16, 2017, which, in turn, claims priority to European Patent Application No. 16.160907.8 filed Mar. 17, 2016. The contents of each of these prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5693762 | Queen | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5919452 | Le | Jul 1999 | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 623 515 | Aug 2013 | EP |
| WO-2009155723 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2011127141 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012007880 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| WO 2015065987 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015144852 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015144852 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2017158079 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017158084 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017158097 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Janeway et al., Immunobiology, 3rd edition, Garland Publishing Inc., 1997, pp. 3:1-3:21. |
| Rudikoff et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Mar. 1982;79(6):1979-83. |
| “Assessment Report For Cimzia”, European Medicines Agency: Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use, Doc. Ref.: EMEA/664021/2009, London, UK (Oct. 22, 2009). |
| “Assessment Report For Simponi”, European Medicines Agency: Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use, Doc. Ref.: EMEA/44762/2009, London, UK (Oct. 20, 2009). |
| Marie Wiekowski et al., “Infliximab (Remicade)”, Handbook of Therapeutic Antibodies, pp. 885-904, Stefan Dübel, ed., Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, Jan. 2007. |
| Harmut Kupper et al., “Adalimumab (Humira)”, Handbook of Therapeutic Antibodies, pp. 697-732, Stefan Dübel, ed., Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, Jan. 2007. |
| Gil Melmed et al., “Certolizumab pegol”, Nature Reviews: Drug Discovery, vol. 7. No. 8, pp. 641-642, Aug. 1, 2008. |
| Sohini Mazumdar et al., “Golimumab”, MABS: Landes Bioscience, vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 422-431, Sep. 1, 2009. |
| “CDP 571: Anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, BAY 103356, Bay W 3356, Humicade”, Drugs in R&D, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 174-178, Jan. 1, 2003. |
| José W. Saldanha, “Molecular Engineering I: Humanization”, Handbook of Therapeutic Antibodies, pp. 119-144, Stefan Dubel, ed., Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, Jan. 2007. |
| Jonathan Gershoni et al., “Epitope mapping—The First Step in Developing Epitope-Based Vaccines”, Biodrugs, vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 145-156, Jan. 1, 2007. |
| Daniel Tracey et al., “Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist Mechanisms of Action: A Comprehensive Review”, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 117, No. 2, pp. 244-279. Oct. 26, 2007. |
| Stuart Rudikoff et al., “Single Amino Acid Substituion Altering Antigen-Binding Specificity”, PNAS USA, vol. 79, No. 6, pp. 1979-1983, Mar. 1, 1982. |
| Janeway et al., Immunobiology, 3rd edition, Garland Publishing Inc., 1997, pp. 3:1 to 3:21. |
| Rudikoff et al., PNAS USA, Mar. 1982, 79(6): 1979-83. |
| Edwards et al., J. Mol. Biol., Nov. 2003, 334(1): 103-118. |
| Goel et al., J. Immunol., Dec. 2004, 173(12): 7358-7367. |
| Lloyd et al., Protein Eng. Des. Sel., Mar. 2009, 22(3): 159-168. |
| Lescar et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1995, 270(3): 18067-18076. |
| Kanyavuz et al., Nat. Rev. Immunol., Jun. 2019, 19(6): 355-368. |
| Stryer, L., Biochemistry, 4th edition, WH Freeman and Company, 1995, pp. 18-23. |
| Urech et al., Ann. Rheum. Dis., 2010, 69:443-449. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230272059 A1 | Aug 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16085506 | US | |
| Child | 17890857 | US |
