The invention relates to an anti-trap device for a door frame, that is to say for a door, a window or a French window, more commonly known as an “anti-finger-trap device”.
When an opening leaf is brought into the open position, a space forms between the jamb and the rear edge face of the opening leaf and various elements including one or more fingers of an adult resting against the fixed frame or an inquisitive young child may enter this space. If the door is returned to the open position, the faces delimiting the space created move closer together and, like jaws, trap whatever is between them with a force that is all the higher because it is multiplied by the lever arm formed between the axis of articulation and the free edge of the opening leaf. While such trapping is painful to the fingers of an adult, it creates a great deal of trauma in the fingers of a child, which may suffer fractures with permanent after effects.
To remedy that, the prior art provides a number of solutions.
The solution most commonly employed to date is to fit, at least to the lower part of the opening leaf, on each side and between the opening leaf and the fixed frame, a cover which covers the exterior trap zone and prevents anything from entering it. Document FR2726317 describes one embodiment of this. This arrangement is effective, but esthetically highly unattractive.
In another solution, the opening leaf is articulated by pivots arranged top and bottom, as described in documents WO2007/0204024 and FR2723136. Document FR2751370 describes a double articulation with link rods that allow the opening leaf to pivot in such a way that it folds flat against the fixed frame. Thus, in the open position, the trapping jaws form an angle of 180° between them and no longer present any attraction to an inquisitive child.
In document DE10023764, which likewise relates to an articulation technique using pivots top and bottom, the opposing edge corners of the fixed frame and of the opening leaf respectively are one concave and the other convex and intermesh in such a way as to limit the radial clearance between them and, in the open position, to reduce the gap between the elements and thus prevent any possibility of fingers being inserted into this gap.
The disadvantage with these solutions is that they employ an articulation using pivots top and bottom, which are not suited to all styles of door frames and are difficult to remove.
In document EP0 237 789 which relates to an articulation for a wardrobe or cabinet door, the opening leaf is articulated to a fixed frame by at least two hinges the vertical axis of articulation of which is arranged transversely mid-way across the thickness of the fixed frame, said opening leaf having a rounded edge corner facing the fixed frame and each hinge comprising:
This cabinet door articulation is designed, by elastic notching, to immobilize the door in two positions, but provides no solution to the problem of children trapping their fingers between the opening leaf and the fixed frame because, as
The object of the invention is to provide an anti-trap device for a door frame which, taking its inspiration from the last structure described, does not impair the esthetic look of the door frame, is reliable, regardless of the angle to which the opening leaf has been opened, is effective from both sides and, without complex operations, allows anybody to remove the opening leaf.
According to the invention, the fixed frame has, over its entire height and facing the fillet of the opening leaf, an inclined face of which the distance from the fixed frame increases in the direction from the inside to the outside and which joins onto the interior face of a cover strip, this strip being arranged parallel to the wall that bears the fixed frame and extending at least past the fillet of the opening leaf B to oppose any access to the exterior gap D between opening leaf and fixed frame, while each of the hinges comprises,
Thanks to the rounded shape of the opening leaf, to the fact that it is pivoted near to the inclined face of the fixed frame and to the fact that the opening leaf is articulated about a vertical geometric axis arranged mid-way across the thickness and also thanks to the mount for each hinge, opening the opening leaf does not alter the size of the space between these elements, which means that there is no longer any exterior trap space.
Moreover, the fact that this space is covered by the strip protruding from the fixed frame prevents any foreign body from being introduced into this space.
On the other side of the articulation, that is to say on the same side as the faces which move closer together during the pivoting movement involved in opening the opening leaf, the rounded shape of the opening leaf slides over the body introduced into the space, heralding this movement and encouraging the removal of the object engaged in this space, before the jaws thus formed are in a position to trap. When they do bite or trap, the inclination of the face of the fixed frame generates a component of force which tends to drive out the body that is in the process of becoming trapped.
Depending on the embodiment, the inclined face facing the fillet of the opening leaf and the cover strip are formed in a section piece which is either added on and attached to the existing fixed frame of a door frame that is in the process of being converted, or constitutes the fixed frame of a new door frame.
This embodiment means that the anti-trap device can be used on existing or new door frames.
In one embodiment of the invention, the male element of each hinge consists of a couched U-shaped bracket each of the flanges of which bears a vertical hinge pin projecting toward the other flange, while in the female element of each hinge, the cylindrical articulation body has a C-shaped cross section which delimits an opening that can be closed off by a removable cover, this opening comprising a vertical groove to accept the hinge pins of the male element and, in its central part, a small bar that can be inserted between the ends of the hinge pins and constitutes a member for positioning the cover by collaboration with a horizontal slot made therein.
Depending on the application, the various components of the anti-trap device can be made of plastic or of metal, such as steel or aluminum.
Other features and advantages will become apparent from the description which follows, with reference to the attached schematic drawing which depicts one embodiment of the device according to the invention when applied to a door.
a to 18c are side elevations showing a series of pairs of thickness washers;
In this drawing, the fixed frame and the opening leaf of the door frame are referenced in general by the letters A and B while the components of the device are referenced by the following numerals: 2 and 3 for the respective male and female elements of the hinge, 4 for the cover that closes the female element 3, and 5 for the section piece which, in the embodiment depicted in
In a known way, each opening leaf B is articulated to its fixed frame A by at least two and sometimes three unhingable hinges the axes of rotation of which are vertically aligned. In the device according to the invention, this geometric axis of articulation is arranged mid-way across the thickness of the door frame so that as the opening leaf moves, its edge corner does not protrude widening the trap zone D that forms on the outside upon opening. The components of the anti-trap device are produced by molding or casting and, depending on the embodiment, using plastics or metals such as steel, bronze or aluminum.
The device is mounted on an opening leaf B of which the edge or edge corner 6, which is intended to be articulated to the fixed frame A is rounded and has, locally, as shown in greater detail in
As shown in greater detail in
In order to achieve this precise positioning, the male element 2 has a dorsal tenon 2c which, projecting from its web 2c, fits into a mortise 8 created in the bottom of each housing 7.
Each of the flanges 2a carries a vertical hinge pin 9 which projects from its internal face and extends toward the other flange coaxial, with the hinge pin thereof. The opposing ends of the two hinge pins are separated by a gap K. Finally,
The cover 4 is positioned transversely via its radial faces 12a and 13a fitting against those 12 and 13 of the body and is positioned vertically by a transverse slot 16 arranged substantially mid-way up its height and fitting over a small bar 17 belonging to the articulation body 3a. This small bar has a vertical dimension which is smaller than the distance K between the two hinge pins 9, so that it can be inserted between them.
In the embodiment depicted in
The rounded groove 14a of the cover connects to a clearance face 14b tangential to it and substantially parallel to the face 13a, the usefulness of which will be specified later.
The attachment mount 3b of each hinge is intended to fit into one of the housings 20 which are formed vertically in the section piece 5 that constitutes the fixed frame A of the door frame or is attached thereto.
In each of these two applications, the face 21 which is intended to face the rounded edge 6 of the opening leaf is inclined by around 45° extending away from the fixed frame in the direction from the inside to the outside. This inclined face joins, on the interior side, by a convex fillet 22 to the interior lateral face 23 and, on the other side, is joined by a convex fillet 24 to a cover strip 25 arranged in the continuation of the external lateral face 26 of the wall.
Each of the housings 20 has an annular shape and is defined by two vertical walls these respectively being the bottom wall 30 and the side wall 31. Projecting from each of these walls is a vertically directed rib 32 and 33 respectively. The stepped profile of the housing 20 corresponds to that of the base of the mount 3b of the hinge that is to be fitted into it.
The male element 2 of each hinge is attached to the opening leaf B by horizontal screws passing through the holes 40 made in the web 2c, while the female element 3 is attached to the section piece 5 by horizontal screws passing through plain holes 41 in the element and screwed into tapped holes 42 in this section piece. The cover 4 is attached to the female element 3 by a horizontal screw 45 passing through it via a plain hole 43 and screwed into a tapped hole 44 in the female element 3.
As
This same figure shows that the geometric axis of articulation G of the hinge is mid-way across the thickness of the fixed frame B, that is to say is in the vertical mid-plane P of this fixed frame A and of the opening leaf B. It also shows that the various elements of the articulation and of each of the hinges are in the continuation of one another, with no protrusion or recess and are dimensioned so that the cover strip 25, which extends toward the opening leaf almost as far as the transverse plane T, passing through the geometric axis of articulation, is spaced away from the fillet 6 of the opening leaf B by a value J of between 1 and 2 millimeters.
Thanks to this arrangement, the exterior trap zone D is non existent and is protected over the entire height of the door frame by the strip 24, this being true for all the positions that the opening leaf can occupy as shown by
It will be noted that the removal of the cover 4 is made easier by its clearance face 14b which does not catch on the hinge pins and allows it to be moved radially out of the opening 11, even though this opening is not completely uncovered by the web 2b of the element 2.
To facilitate unhinging once the cover has been extracted, the door has to be returned to a smaller angle of opening, of the order of 80° as shown in chain line, allowing the hinge pins 9 to slide against the face 12 of the opening created in the female element 3.
To re-fit the opening leaf, the reverse procedure has to be followed. It should be noted here that the faces 12 and 13 of each of the female elements 3 of the hinges facilitate the engagement of the hinge pins in the bottom of the openings 11, which means that there is no need to check their alignment with the elements that accommodate them, as was the case with traditional opening leaves comprising hinge pins. This means that refitting becomes vastly easier.
Finally, and according to one feature of the invention, on the one hand, the mid-plane of the opening 11 formed in the articulation body 3a for the cover 4 and, on the other hand, the geometric axis of the holes 43 and 44 for the fixing screws 45 that connect the cover to the body 3a, are substantially in the vertical mid-plane P of the articulation.
Thanks to this special arrangement, in the event of malicious intent to unhinge the door when it is closed by kicking the door from the outside or by applying forces to it in the direction of the arrow 50 in
Moreover, when the faces 12 and 13 delimit an angle of the order of 90° between them, the transverse forces applied to the faces 12 and 13 have components parallel to the mid-plane P which reduce the value of the transverse forces and limit the consequences of break-in attempts.
It is clear from the foregoing description that the device according to the invention fully performs the function of preventing an adult or a child from trapping his or her fingers, does not wreck the esthetic look of the door frame and at the same time offers resistance to vandalism that is as effective as that offered by opening leaves with hinge pins.
In the embodiments which follow, elements that have the same shapes and perform the same functions retain their reference numerals, those which have been modified are referenced by adding 100 and those which are new are referenced from 50 upward.
The embodiment shown in
This arrangement considerably reduces the friction forces during movements of the door, but also affords a possibility of adjusting the vertical functional clearance, for example in order to compensate for wear over time.
To this end, in each hinge, the articulation pieces 50 associated with the hinge pins 109 of one and the same male element 102 are paired in series Q1, Q2, Q3 . . . Qn, and in such a way that the thickness v of one of the circular flanges of the pair is the complement of the thickness u of the other washer, so that the sum S=v+u is equal, give or take a functional clearance, to the difference L1−L2 between the gap L1 between the flanges 102a of the male element and the thickness L2 of the female element 103 and of the cover 104.
The paired pieces are chosen from a series of pairs which, as
In practice, the value of S is of the order of 5 millimeters and the increment of variation is of the order of 1 millimeter starting from a starting thickness of 0.5 to 1 millimeter. The components of each pair are reversible and are identified either by color or by a visible code, so that there can be no intermixing of components between the various series.
With this arrangement, if following repeated use the opening leaf B drops with respect to the fixed frame A, the height of the articulation afforded by the hinges can easily be adjusted once the door has been removed. All that is required is for the articulation pieces 50 of a series Q1 to be replaced by a series of pieces Q2 or Q3 which, for the lower circular flange, have a thickness u2 or u3 that is greater than the initial thickness u1 and, correspondingly and to compensate, a smaller thickness v2 or v3 of the upper circular flange, so that the value L1 remains constant.
In the embodiment of
The seal 60 is fitted with a heel 62 via which it is set into a vertical slot 63 opening onto the inclined face 121 of the section piece 105 and into a slot 64 which, opening into the space C from the fixing mount 103, is aligned with the first slot 63.
By closing off the functional space F between the opening leaf B and the fixed frame C, the seal 60 thus contributes to the reduction of sound and noise transmission.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 02148 | Apr 2008 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2009/000455 | 4/17/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/3/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/133313 | 11/5/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2331340 | Mosher | Oct 1943 | A |
2557716 | Allee | Jun 1951 | A |
2597174 | Patton et al. | May 1952 | A |
2681480 | Dixon, Sr. | Jun 1954 | A |
2883699 | Gross | Apr 1959 | A |
3490091 | Yombor | Jan 1970 | A |
4878267 | Roach et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5076017 | Jacobs | Dec 1991 | A |
5117587 | Doan | Jun 1992 | A |
5220708 | Lucas et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5419084 | Sankey et al. | May 1995 | A |
5622012 | Schijf | Apr 1997 | A |
7555816 | Walker | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20030200628 | Tatara | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060101617 | Webb | May 2006 | A1 |
20060180282 | Requet | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090288269 | Ross | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100257788 | McRoskey | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110121605 | Ruby et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10023764 | Nov 2001 | DE |
0 237 789 | Sep 1987 | EP |
2623553 | May 1989 | FR |
2723136 | Feb 1996 | FR |
2726317 | May 1996 | FR |
2751370 | Jan 1998 | FR |
WO 8001090 | May 1980 | WO |
2007020424 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report of PCT/FR2009/000455, Dated Mar. 12, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110035901 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |