The invention relates to an anti-vibration element, in particular for a manually operated tool such as a chain saw, a parting-off grinder or similar device.
An anti-vibration element with a coil spring is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,368,107. The coil spring is fixed at both ends and connects a housing part joined to the handle system of the tool to a housing part joined to the engine of the tool. The coil spring of the anti-vibration element has no internal damping. The vibrations of the engine and the tool excite inherent vibrations in the coil spring. These form within a frequency range of 200 to 1000 Hertz depending on the geometry of the spring. These inherent vibrations are transmitted to the handle system of the tool and may, within certain frequency ranges, represent the most significant share of total vibration at the handle system. This vibration is then absorbed by the operator and thus reduces ease of operation and causes the operator to tire more quickly.
The object of the invention is to create an anti-vibration element of the aforementioned general type which achieves improved vibration damping.
This object is achieved by means of an anti-vibration element having an additional mass disposed on a coil spring.
The additional mass shifts the natural frequency of the anti-vibration element. It is thus possible to achieve improved vibration damping in the relevant ranges by simple means.
In particular, the additional mass is held onto the coil spring with play. As soon as the coil spring starts to vibrate, the coil spring comes into contact with the additional mass. The coil spring causes the additional mass to accelerate and this slows the movement of the spring wire and disturbs the resonance characteristics. In this arrangement, the play between the additional mass and the coil spring is dimensioned such that, on one hand, the coil spring and the additional mass may come into contact with one another almost immediately after the start of resonance and, on the other hand, sufficient free spring range is permitted to allow the operating loads to be absorbed undisturbed by the coil spring. The fact that the additional mass is positioned with play thus prevents the formation of inherent vibrations in the coil spring. In order to avoid the development of noise and to prevent wear between the coil spring and the additional mass, an elastic material can be positioned between the coil spring and the additional mass. The elastic material acts as an additional damper. In this arrangement, the elastic material is positioned in particular with play in relation to the coil spring and/or with play in relation to the additional mass such that the additional mass is able to prevent any inherent vibration in the coil spring. The elastic material is advantageously applied in the form of a coating.
The additional mass is held loosely onto the coils of the coil spring. Due to the movement the additional mass is able to rotate itself out of the coil spring. In order to avoid this at least one stop is provided which limits the relative movement between the additional mass and the coil spring along the longitudinal axis of the coil spring. In order to be able to fix the anti-vibration element to the tool by simple means, the coil spring is held between two guides which are positioned coaxially in relation to the longitudinal axis of the spring. A stop is advantageously fixedly connected to a guide and in particular is designed as one part with a guide. Due to the one piece design the stop does not require any additional components. The stop can be integrated into the anti-vibration element simply. The guide advantageously has a hole positioned coaxially in relation to the longitudinal axis of the spring in which is positioned a screw for fixing the anti-vibration element. A simple stop design is achieved by causing the screw to pass through the guide and form a stop at the end of the screw. In order to avoid possible damage in the event of the failure of the coil spring, the anti-vibration element has a safety device which passes through the coil spring. A simple design is produced if a stop is fixed to the safety device. It may, however, also be useful for a stopper forming a stop to be fixed to a spring coil.
In order to fix the additional mass to the coil spring the additional mass is provided with a retainer plate by means of which it is held onto the coil spring. The retainer plate advantageously has at least one loop which encompasses a spring coil. The additional mass can be fixed to the coil spring simply by means of the retainer plate. It may also, however, be useful for the additional mass to have a groove in which sits a section of the coil spring. In this arrangement, the additional mass is particularly designed as a sleeve which has a groove in its inner periphery. The sleeve can be produced simply by forming the sleeve from two molded sections which are connected, particularly screwed together. The design of the sleeve as two molded sections means that the sleeve can be placed directly onto the coil spring rather than being screwed onto the coil spring from one end. This simplifies the fitting of the anti-vibration element. It is, however, also possible for the additional mass to be designed in the form of a disk and to have at least one outwardly projecting retainer on which the groove is formed. The additional mass is thus positioned completely within the coil spring in such a manner that the amount of space required for the anti-vibration element is not increased by the additional mass.
In order to effectively avoid the formation of natural frequencies in the coil spring the additional mass is positioned in the area of the center of the coil spring. It may, however, also be advantageous for the additional mass to be positioned in the area of a vibration antinode of the coil spring.
Embodiments of the invention are explained below with reference to the drawings, in which:
FIGS. 9/10 show sections through an additional mass on a spring coil;
The anti-vibration element 1 illustrated in section in
Positioned in the area of the geometrical center 26 of the coil spring 2 is an additional or supplemental mass 8. The additional mass 8 is of essentially disk-shaped design and has two holes 10 positioned approximately opposite one another through each of which runs a coil 9 of the coil spring 2. As shown in the schematic view given in
A further embodiment of the anti-vibration element 1 is illustrated in
In the embodiment of the anti-vibration element 1 illustrated in
The specification incorporates by reference the disclosure of German priority document 103 32 637.5 filed Jul. 18, 2003.
The present invention is, of course, in no way restricted to the specific disclosure of the specification and drawings, but also encompasses any modifications within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 32 637 | Jul 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1432604 | Lang | Oct 1922 | A |
1878128 | Griswold | Sep 1932 | A |
2112293 | Kromm et al. | Mar 1938 | A |
2520937 | Kennard, Jr. | Sep 1950 | A |
2704696 | Rasmussen | Mar 1955 | A |
2829883 | Copeland | Apr 1958 | A |
2875731 | Settles et al. | Mar 1959 | A |
2991066 | Fenton | Jul 1961 | A |
3014713 | Fenton | Dec 1961 | A |
3085657 | Preis | Apr 1963 | A |
3256594 | Howard et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3326545 | Bache | Jun 1967 | A |
3559976 | Jerz, Jr. | Feb 1971 | A |
3572678 | Jerz, Jr. | Mar 1971 | A |
3622142 | Lorio | Nov 1971 | A |
3830517 | McNeill | Aug 1974 | A |
3853202 | Jarboe | Dec 1974 | A |
3866896 | Wehner | Feb 1975 | A |
4098498 | Da Silva | Jul 1978 | A |
4478293 | Weilenmann et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4612429 | Milianowicz | Sep 1986 | A |
4640500 | Shiau | Feb 1987 | A |
4712778 | Newman | Dec 1987 | A |
4974794 | Aubry et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5090657 | Dreiman | Feb 1992 | A |
5361500 | Naslund et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368107 | Taomo | Nov 1994 | A |
5447295 | Taomo | Sep 1995 | A |
6409160 | Meier et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6471197 | Denk et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6763897 | Hanke et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6799642 | Wolf et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
20020104665 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030111311 | Saito et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040119216 | Menzel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
197 07 617 | Sep 1997 | DE |
10332637 | Feb 2005 | DE |
1081407 | Mar 2001 | EP |
2404235 | Jan 2005 | GB |
53064326 | Nov 1976 | JP |
59-138789 | Aug 1984 | JP |
2-309031 | Dec 1990 | JP |
07259915 | Oct 1995 | JP |
10-9337 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-142253 | May 1998 | JP |
2002-227922 | Aug 2002 | JP |
WO9956033 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0229277 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050011714 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |