Patent Application
20080317764
The present invention concerns processes for the production of antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin D, the antibodies produced according to the inventive processes, as well as methods for detecting 25-hydroxyvitamin D using these antibodies.
An adequate supply of vitamin D is vital as the term “vitamin” already suggests. A deficiency of vitamin D leads to severe diseases such as rickets or osteoporosis. While vitamin D was still regarded as a single substance at the beginning of the last century, the vitamin D system has developed further in the course of the last three decades into a complex and manifold network of vitamin D metabolites. Nowadays more than 40 different vitamin D metabolic products are known (Zerwekh, J. E., Ann. Clin. Biochem. 41 (2004) 272-281).
Humans can only produce D3 vitamins or calciferols by the action of ultraviolet rays from sunlight on the skin. Vitamin D3 that is produced in the skin binds to the so-called vitamin D binding protein which transports it into the liver where it is converted into 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 by 25-hydroxylation. A multitude of other tissues are nowadays known to be involved in vitamin D metabolism in addition to the skin and liver, the two organs that have already been mentioned (Schmidt-Gayk, H. et al. (eds.), “Calcium regulating hormones, vitamin D metabolites and cyclic AMP”, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg (1990), pp. 24-47). 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and more specifically 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 are the central storage forms of vitamin D in the human organism with regard to their amounts. When needed these precursors can be converted in the kidneys to form the biologically active 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, the so-called D hormone. The biologically active vitamin D regulates among others calcium uptake from the intestine, bone mineralization, and it influences a large number of other metabolic pathways such as, e.g., the insulin system.
Measuring the vitamin D level itself is of little benefit when determining the vitamin D status of a patient because concentrations of vitamin D (vitamin D2 and vitamin D3) fluctuate greatly depending on food uptake. In addition vitamin D has a relatively short biological half-life in the circulation (24 hours) and it is therefore also for this reason not a suitable parameter for determining the vitamin D status of a patient. The same also applies to physiologically active forms of vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D). These biologically active forms also occur in relatively small and highly fluctuating concentrations compared to 25-hydroxyvitamin D. For all these reasons the quantification of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in particular is a suitable means to globally analyze the total vitamin D status of a patient.
Due to the high clinical importance of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, a large number of methods are known from the literature which allow 25-hydroxyvitamin D to be more or less reliably determined.
Haddad, J. G. et al., J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 33 (1971) 992-995 and Eisman, J. A. et al., Anal. Biochem. 80 (1977) 298-305, for example, describe the determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in blood samples using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Other approaches for the determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are based among others on the use of vitamin D binding proteins like those that are present in milk. Thus Holick, M. F. and Ray, R. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,779) and DeLuca et al. (EP 0 583 945) describe vitamin D assays for hydroxyvitamin D and dihydroxyvitamin D which are based on the binding of these substances to vitamin D-binding protein where the concentrations of these substances are determined by means of a competitive test procedure. However, a prerequisite of this method is that vitamin D metabolites to be determined firstly have to be isolated from the original blood or serum samples by organic extraction and have to be purified by, for example, chromatography.
Armbruster, F. P. et al. (WO 99/67211) teach that a serum or plasma sample should be prepared for vitamin D determination by ethanol precipitation. In this method the protein precipitate is removed by centrifugation, and the ethanolic supernatant contains soluble vitamin D metabolites. These can be measured in a competitive binding assay.
Alternatively EP 0 753 743 teaches that the proteins can be separated from blood or serum samples using a periodate salt. In this case vitamin D compounds are determined in the protein-free supernatant from the samples treated with periodate. In some commercial tests acetonitrile is recommended for the extraction of serum or plasma samples (e.g., in the radioimmunoassay from DiaSorin or in the vitamin D test from the Immundiagnostik Company).
In recent years a number of different release reagents were proposed which should in principle be suitable for releasing vitamin D compounds from binding protein present in the sample. However, this release or detachment should be carried out under relatively mild conditions, thus enabling a direct use of the sample treated with the release reagent in a binding test (see, for example, WO 02/57797 and US 2004/0132104). Despite immense efforts in recent years, all available methods for determining vitamin D have certain disadvantages such as laborious sample preparation, poor standardization, poor agreement between test procedures, or bad recovery of spiked vitamin D (see for this in particular Zerwekh, J. E., supra).
In particular no methods are described in the prior art that can be used to reliably produce antibodies for determining 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The object of the present invention was therefore, among others, to find a method which can be used to reliably produce suitable antibodies for a 25-hydroxyvitamin D test. Such a method, the antibodies produced by the method, as well as methods and kits for determining vitamin D using these antibodies are described in the following.
The present invention concerns a process for producing antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin D which comprises the following steps:
Furthermore the invention concerns antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 which have a cross-reaction with 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 of the order of magnitude of 10% to 1000%.
The present application also describes how the antibodies according to the present invention can be used for an automated test to detect 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
In addition a test kit for detecting 25-hydroxyvitamin D is disclosed which contains the reagent compositions required for the test procedure and among others the antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin D according to the invention.
The present invention concerns a process for producing antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin D which comprises the following steps:
If not stated otherwise, the term “vitamin D” is understood to include the forms of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 according to the following structural formulae I and II
In the structural formulae I and II, the positions of vitamin D are stated according to the steroid nomenclature. The 25-hydroxyvitamin D denotes vitamin D metabolites that are hydroxylated at position 25 of the structural formulae I and II, i.e., 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 as well as 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. As already elucidated above, 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 are, particularly relevant forms of vitamin D for diagnostics.
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D refers to the active forms of vitamin D (the so-called D hormones) that have a hydroxylation at position 1 as well as at position 25 of the structural formulae I and II.
Other known vitamin D metabolites are 24-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 as well as 24-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.
All known vitamin D metabolites are as such not immunogenic. The chemical activation of components from vitamin D metabolism as well as their coupling to carrier molecules or reporter groups is not trivial. Thus for a successful immunization it is essential to prepare a conjugate which, for example, contains a 25-hydroxyvitamin D as a hapten. The term hapten is understood by a person skilled in the art as a substance which per se is not immunogenic but, by coupling to a larger carrier molecule, is present in a form against which antibodies can be generated. Suitable carrier materials for the production of hapten conjugates are known to a person skilled in the art. Bovine serum albumin, β-galactosidase, or the so-called keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) are usually used as carrier materials.
KLH has proven to be a particularly suitable carrier for the method according to the invention. Hence a conjugate of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and KLH is preferably used for the immunization.
Various positions of the structures as they are shown in formula I and TI are in principle suitable for activation and coupling to a carrier material, Coupling via position 3 of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 or 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 has, for example, proven to be favorable for the generation of antibodies which bind a 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a suitable manner. Hence in a preferred embodiment a conjugate is used in an immunization method according to the invention which contains 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 or 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 that has been coupled via position 3 of the backbone (cf. formulae I and II).
In a series of experiments that were part of the work for the present invention, attempts were made to purify antibodies that had been produced using a 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 immunogen by immunosorption to a 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 matrix and to use them in a corresponding test. However, these experiments were unsuccessful. However, it was surprisingly found that suitable antibodies can be obtained from the same sera by immunosorption to a 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 matrix. This method has proven to be reliable and reproducible. The method according to the invention therefore comprises a step for purifying antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin Dx (where x=2 or 3) from serum or plasma by immunosorption to a matrix which contains a conjugate of the respective complementary form of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D. In this sense 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 is complementary to 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and conversely 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 is complementary to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. This means that immunosorption to 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 is carried out when immunizing with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and immunosorption to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 is carried out when immunizing with 25-hydroxyvitamin D2.
Moreover, it has proven to be advantageous to use the same position of the vitamin D backbone for chemical coupling in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D conjugate used for the immunization and in the matrix used for the immunosorption. The coupling in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 conjugate is preferably via position 3 of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 for the immunization, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 is also preferably coupled to the matrix at position 3.
The converse procedure is also successful, i.e., immunization with a 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 conjugate and immunosorption with a matrix to which 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 is coupled. In another preferred element of the invention a 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 conjugate is used as the immunogen conjugate, and the antibodies generated with this immunogen are immunoadsorbed onto a 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 matrix.
EAH-SEPHAROSE has proven to be particularly suitable as the matrix material for the immunosorption. In a preferred embodiment the antibodies contained in the serum or plasma from an immunization against 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 or 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 are purified by immunosorption using a matrix which contains 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 or 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. EAH-SEPHAROSE is a preferred column material.
Using the procedure previously described in detail, i.e., for example, immunization with a 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 conjugate and immunosorption using a 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 conjugate, it is possible to reproducibly produce antibodies which react with both forms of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, i.e., with 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. The antibodies obtained in this manner have a cross-reaction of the order of magnitude of 10% to 1000%. Thus in a preferred embodiment the present invention concerns, for example, antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 which have a cross-reaction of 10% to 1000% with 25-hydroxyvitamin D2. The cross-reaction with the complementary 25-hydroxyvitamin D form is also preferably in a range of 20% to 500%. The extent of cross-reaction is determined in an immunological test method using the antibodies produced according to the present invention. An antibody produced against 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 as a hapten, for examples has a cross-reaction of 10% t for 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 if, when using the same analyte concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 or 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, only a tenth of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 is: read-off on a calibration curve generated with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.
The antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin D produced by a process according to the invention have proven to be suitable for use in an automated test for 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Hence the present invention preferably concerns the use of an antibody against 25-hydroxyvitamin D in an immunological test for the detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The test for 25-hydroxyvitamin D is preferably completely automated. The antibodies according to the invention are particularly preferably used in a test that can be carried out on automated ELECSYS (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) analyzers.
The teaching according to the present invention enables a person skilled in the art to put together a test kit which contains all components required for the detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. A preferred test kit for detecting 25-hydroxyvitamin D is in particular characterized in that such a kit contains an antibody against 25-hydroxyvitamin D which recognizes both forms of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, i.e., has a cross-reaction of 10% to 1000% to the complementary form of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in each case.
The test is preferably carried out as a competitive immunoassay in which the antibodies against 25-hydroxyvitamin D according to the invention are preferably used as a detection reagent. In such a competitive test, a 25-hydroxyvitamin D “wall antigen” added in a defined amount to the test competes with the 25-hydroxyvitamin D from the sample for the binding sites of the detection antibody. The more 25-hydroxyvitamin D is present in the sample the smaller is the detection signal.
In addition it has proven to be advantageous that the form of 25-hydroxyvitamin D present as the wall antigen in the competitive test corresponds to the form that is used in the immunosorption. If one, for example, immunizes with an immunogen containing 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, immunosorption is carried out on a 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 matrix, and a 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 derivative is preferably used in the test as the wall antigen. The wall antigen is preferably also modified at the same ring position as the immunogen and as the 25-hydroxyvitamin D used on the matrix for immunosorption.
In a further preferred embodiment, the present invention concerns an immunological detection method for 25-hydroxyvitamin D in which a polyclonal antibody is used which was obtained by immunization with a 25-hydroxyvitamin D conjugate and immunosorption to the complementary 25-hydroxyvitamin D conjugate and wherein in a competitive test, a derivative of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D complementary to the immunogen is used as the wall antigen.
The invention is further elucidated by the following examples and figures. The actual protective scope results from the claims attached to this invention.
For this synthesis, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 was chemically activated at position 3 (cf. formula II) and coupled to KLH as an immunogen support. This synthesis via the intermediate steps 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-3-hemisuccinate and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-3-hemisuccinate-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester is shown schematically in
10 mg (25 μmol) 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (Sigma-Aldrich, No. H-4014) was dissolved in 1 ml absolute pyridine and stirred for 4 days at room temperature in the dark with 125 mg (1.25 mmol) succinic anhydride. The reaction mixture was taken up in 10 ml ethyl acetate and in each case washed with 2×10 ml water, 0.1 M hydrochloric acid and subsequently again with water. The organic phase was dried using about 1 g anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and the solvent was removed in a vacuum. The residual solid was dried in a high vacuum. 10.5 mg (yield: 84%) of a colourless solid was obtained.
10.0 mg (20 μmol) 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-3-hemisuccinate was dissolved in 7 ml anhydrous dichloromethane and admixed with 2.76 mg (24 μmol) N-hydroxy-succinimide and 3.72 mg (24 μmol) N(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethyl-carbodiimide (EDC). It was stirred overnight under argon, the organic phase was then washed twice with 10 ml water, dried over about 1 g anhydrous sodium sulfate and filtered. The solvent was removed in a vacuum and the residual reaction product was dried for 3 h in a high vacuum. 11.3 mg (yield: 94%) N-hydroxysuccinimide ester was obtained which was used for the conjugation without further purification.
150 mg keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH; Sigma-Aldrich No. H 8283) was dissolved in 25 ml 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, and 11.3 mg of the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester in 2 ml DMSO was added. It was stirred overnight at room temperature, the product was subsequently purified by means of a gel column (AcA 202, column volume 0.5 l; 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0). The fractions containing the conjugated protein were detected by means of UV absorption (λ=256 nm) and pooled. 10% glycerol was added, sand the grey opalescent solution was used for the immunization.
The antibodies were produced in sheep. The 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-3-hemisuccinate KLH conjugate from Example 1 was used for the immunization. The immunization dosage was 0.1 mg per animal. The first immunization was carried out in complete Freund's adjuvant. Further immunizations took place at 4 week intervals in incomplete Freund's adjuvant over a period of 10 months. Serum was collected in the middle of each immunization interval.
The lipid-containing components were removed from the serum of the sheep immunized with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-3-hemisuccinate-KLH conjugate with the aid of AEROSIL (Evonik Degussa GmbH) (1.5%). Subsequently the immunoglobulins were precipitated with ammonium sulfate (1.7 M). The precipitate was dialysed against 15 mM potassium phosphate buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.0, and subsequently purified chromatographically by DEAE SEPHAROSE. The IgG fraction (=PAB<25-hydroxyvitamin D3>S-IgG (DE)) was obtained from the flow-through of this chromatography column. (PAB=polyclonal antibody)
An immunadsorber which contained conjugated 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 as the specificity determinant was prepared for the imnmunochromatographic purification of the polyclonal antibodies. The immunadsorber was obtained by the following steps:
20.6 mg (50 μmol) 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (Fluka No. 17937) was dissolved in a 25 ml three-necked round bottom flask with an internal thermometer in 10 ml dry acetonitrile under an argon atmosphere. 1.5 ml tert-butanol/acetonitrile (9:1) was added to the solution and cooled to 6° C. in an ice bath. Subsequently 820 μl of an acrylonitrile solution (86 μl acrylonitrile in 1.0 ml acetonitrile) was added and stirred for 15 minutes at 6° C. Then 205 μl of a potassium hydride solution (25 mg KH in 0.5 ml tert-butanol/acetonitrile 9:1) was added. A brief flocculation occurred after which a clear solution was obtained. The reaction solution was stirred for a further 45 minutes at 6° C. and subsequently for 60 minutes at 4° C.
Subsequently the reaction solution was diluted with 10 ml methyl-tert-butyl ether and washed twice with 10 ml H2O each time. The organic phase was dried with about 1 g anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered over a G3 glass frit and evaporated on a rotary evaporator. It was dried in a high vacuum to a viscous clear residue with a mass of about 55 mg.
The entire nitrile obtained above was dissolved in 15 ml diethyl ether and admixed with a suspension of 7.5 mg lithium hydride in 7.5 ml diethyl ether while stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 hour at room temperature. Afterwards a suspension of 38.4 lithium aluminium hydride in 6.6 ml diethyl ether was added. This resulted in a strong turbidity of the mixture. The reaction mixture was stirTed for a further hour at room temperature, then the reaction mixture was cooled to 0-5° C. in an ice bath, and 35 ml water was carefully added. The pH was made strongly basic by addition of 6.6 ml 10 M potassium hydroxide solution.
It was extracted three times with 65 ml methyl-tert-butyl ether each time. The combined organic phases were dried using about 5 g anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated at room temperature on a rotary evaporator. The residue was dried to mass constancy using an oil pump. The crude product was dissolved in 5 ml DMSO and 3.0 ml acetonitrile and purified by means of preparative HPLC.
Fractions whose product content was higher than 85% according to analytical HPLC (Vydac C18/300 Å/5 μm; 4.6×250 mm) were pooled in a round bottom flask and lyophilized. 13.7 mg (yield: 58%) of a colourless lyophilisate was obtained.
11.7 mg (25 μmol) of the amino derivative was dissolved in 5 ml freshly distilled DMF, and 92 mg (250 μmol) suberic acid-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester was added. 3.5 μl triethylamine was added, and the solution was stirred overnight under argon. The crude product was purified by preparative HPLC (conditions as above). 10.1 mg (yield: 56%) N-hydroxysuccinimide ester was obtained after lyophilization.
20 ml EAH SEPHAROSE (Amersham Biosciences, No. 17-0569-03) was washed with 200 ml 0.5 M sodium chloride solution on a (G3 glass frit and equilibrated with 200 ml 0.03 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.1. After excess liquid had drained off through the frit, the suspension was taken up in 200 ml of the same buffer, and 1.7 mg (2.3 μmol) of the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester in 10 ml DMSO was added. The reaction mixture was agitated overnight at room temperature on a shaker. It was again transferred to a G3 glass frit, allowed to drain, and washed with 500 ml 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer/0.15 M sodium chloride, pH 7.0. After complete drainage, it was resuspended in 25 ml of the same buffer, and 0.15 ml of a 25% sodium azide solution was added for preservation.
10 ml of the affinity matrix from d) was packed into a column and equilibrated with a buffer consisting of 50 mM potassium phosphate, 150 mM NaCl at a pH of 7.5 (PBS). 3.6 g of PAB<25-hydroxyvitamin D3>S-IgG (DE) was loaded onto the column. The column was washed stepwise with PBS, 0.5 M NaCl solution containing 0.05% TWEEN 20 (ICI Americas Inc.) and 30 mM sodium chloride. The specifically bound immunoglobulin was detached from the affinity matrix with 3 mM HCl solution. The HCl eluate was dialysed against 1 mM ethyl acetate and subsequently lyophilized. The lyophilisate was dissolved in PBS, aggregates were removed by chromatography on SUPERDEX 200 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB), and the immunoadsorbed polyclonal antibodies obtained in this manner were used in a further step. The imnmunoaffinity matrix was regenerated with 1 M propionic acid and preserved in a solution of PBS containing 0.9% sodium azide.
Commercial assays were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The 25-hydroxyvitamin D determinations were carried out by means of HPLC (test for 25(OH)vitamin D3 from the Immundiagnostik Company, Bensheim, order no. KC 3400) or by means of LC-MS-MS (Vogeser, M. et al., Clin. Chem. 50 (2004) 1415-1417) as described in the literature.
The preparation of the ingredients and the general test procedure for a new immunological test is described in the following on the basis of antibodies produced according to the invention:
13.7 mg (25 μmol) hydroxyvitamin D2-3-3′-aminopropyl ether was dissolved in 3.5 ml DMSO, 28.7 mg (30 μmol) biotin-(beta-Ala)-Glu-Glu-Lys(epsilon)-hemi-suberate-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Roche Applied Science, No. 11866656) and 12.5 μl triethylamine were added, and it was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction solution was diluted with 4.5 ml DMSO, filtered through a 0.45 μm microfilter, and subsequently purified by means of preparative HPLC (conditions see Example 2.3 b)). Fractions that contain more than 85% product according to analytical HPLC were pooled and lyophilized. 9.8 mg (yield: 30%) purified biotin conjugate was obtained.
The affinity-purified antibodies according to example 2.3 e) were transferred to 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5, and the protein concentration was adjusted to 1 mg/ml. The ruthenylation reagent (ruthenium (II) tris (bipyridyl)-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester) was dissolved in DMSO and added to the antibody solution at a molar ratio of 7.5 to 1. After a reaction time of 60 min, the reaction was stopped by addition of I-lysine, and the excess labelling reagent was separated by gel permeation chromatography on SEPHADEX G25 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB).
The sample was measured using an ELECSYS system from the Roche Diagnostics company. 25 μl sample was mixed with 30 μl release reagent and simultaneously or sequentially with 15 μl ruthenylated detection antibody and incubated for 9 minutes. In the next step, the biotinylated wall antigen (50 μl) was added and the pH value was kept in the desired range by further addition of release reagent (50 μl). After a further 9 minutes incubation, magnetizable polystyrene particles coated with streptavidin (SA) (30 μl) were added, and after a further incubation for 9 minutes, the amount of bound ruthenylated antibody was determined as usual.
The solution containing the ruthenylated <25-OH-vitamin D> antibody conjugate contained 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, 0.1% oxypyrion, 0.1% MIT (N-methylisothiazolone-HCl), 10% DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide), 11% EtOH (ethanol), 0.1% polydocanol, 1% rabbit IgG (DET), and 2.0 μg/ml PAB-Ru (from example 3.2).
The release reagent contained 220 mM acetate buffer, pH 4.0, 0.1% oxypyrion, 0.1% MIT, 10% DMSO, 1% EtOH, 0.1% polydocanol, and 0.2% rabbit IgG.
The solution with the biotinylated wall antigen contained 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, 0.1% oxypyrion, 10% DMSO, 1% EtOH, 0.1% polydocanol, 0.2% rabbit IgG, and 0.18 μg/ml Ag—Bi (from example 3.1).
The suspension with SA-coated latex particles contained 0.72 mg/ml SA-coated magnetizable polystyrene particles having a binding capacity of 470 ng/ml.
In many (unsuccessful) experiments, antibodies were used which had been produced according to methods of the prior art, i.e., immunization with and immunosorption to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.
The detection of vitamin D metabolites by LC-MS-MS as described in Vogeser, M., et al., Clin. Chem. 50 (2004) 1415-1417 was increasingly becoming the reference method for vitamin D metabolite determinations. It was therefore investigated whether the previous HPLC, reference method results in comparable values to the newer LC-MS-MS reference method. As can be seen from
A total of 66 samples were compared in the new immunological test as well as by means of LC-MS-MS with regard to their content of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. As can be seen from
Thus a test for the detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D can be established using the antibodies according to the present invention, which enables a reliable determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05021247.1 | Sep 2005 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of PCT/EP2006/009360 filed Sep. 27, 2006 and claims priority to EP 05021247.1 filed Sep. 29, 2005.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/EP2006/009360 | Sep 2006 | US |
| Child | 12053172 | US |
