Patent Application
20140322210
The invention relates to the field of passive immunization against influenza. More particularly, specific antibodies that bind near to the HA0 maturation cleavage site consensus sequence of influenza hemagglutinin A, including antibodies secreted by human cells are described.
The hemagglutinin protein (HA) of influenza virus has a globular head domain which is highly heterogeneous among flu strains and a stalk region containing a fusion site which is needed for entry into the cells. HA is present as a trimer on the viral envelope. The uncleaved form of hemagglutinin protein (HA0) is activated by cleavage by trypsin into HA1 and HA2 portions to permit the fusion site to effect virulence. The two cleaved portions remain coupled using disulfide bonds but undergo a conformational change in the low pH environment of the host cell endosomal compartment which leads to fusion of the viral and host cell membranes.
The cleavage site contains a consensus sequence that is shared both by influenza A and influenza B and by the various strains of influenza A and B. The uncleaved hemagglutinin protein trimer (HA0) is referred to as the inactivated form, whereas when cleaved into HA1 and HA2 portions, the hemagglutinin protein is referred to as being in the activated form.
Bianchi, E., et al., J. Virol. (2005) 79:7380-7388 describe a “universal” influenza B vaccine based on the consensus sequence of this cleavage site wherein a peptide comprising this site was able to raise antibodies in mice when conjugated to the outer membrane protein complex of Neisseria meningitidis. Monoclonal antibodies which appear to bind to the consensus sequence were also described. In addition, successful passive transfer of antiserum was observed in mice. Other prior art vaccines, such as those described in WO2004/080403 comprising peptides derived from the M2 and/or HA proteins of influenza induce antibodies that are either of weak efficacy or are not effective across strains.
Antibodies described in the art which bind the HA stalk region involve those developed by Crucell, CR6261 and CR8020 described in Throsby, M., et al., PLoS One (2008) 3:e3942, Ekiert, D. C., et al., Science (2011) 333:843-850, and Sui, J., et al., Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. (2009) 16:265-273. An MAB has also been developed against the conserved M2E antigen as described by Grandea, A. G., et al., PNAS USA (2010) 107:12658-12663. M2E is on the surface of infected cells and is also the target of amantadine and rimantadine. Drug resistance has occurred against these antibiotics which suggests that this target does not serve an essential function.
An additional antibody has been described by the Lanzavecchia Group: Corti, D., et al., Science (2011) 333:850-856 which binds and neutralizes both Group 1 and Group 2 strains of influenza A, but the potency is not as high as those described herein as shown in the examples below. In addition, an MAB that is immunoreactive against both influenza A and B as described in Dreyfus, C., et al., Science (2012) 337:1343-1348 has less potency than those described below.
PCT application publication No. WO2011/160083, incorporated herein by reference, describes monoclonal antibodies that are derived from human cells and useful in passive vaccines. The antibodies show high affinities of binding to influenza viral clade H1, which is in Group 1, and some of the antibodies also show high affinities to H9, also in Group 1 and/or to H7 in Group 2 and/or H2 in Group 1. Some of the antibodies disclosed bind only the inactivated trimer form, presumably at the consensus cleavage region, while others are able to bind activated hemagglutinin protein which has already been cleaved.
There remains a need for antibodies that bind additional clades and show enhanced affinity thereto.
The invention provides monoclonal antibodies that bind trimers representative of either or both Group 1 and Group 2 of influenza A with enhanced affinity. Such antibodies are able to confer passive immunity in the event of a pandemic caused, for example, by a previously unidentified influenza strain or a strain against which protection is not conferred by the seasonal vaccines currently available. As at least some of the antibodies bind across many strains, indicative of targeting an essential site, they are likely to bind even previously unencountered strains. Such antibodies are also useful to ameliorate or prevent infection in subjects for whom vaccination failed to produce a fully protective response or who are at high risk due to a weak immune system (e.g., the very young, the elderly, transplant patients, cancer or HIV chemotherapy treated patients).
Thus, in one aspect, the invention is directed to binding moieties, notably monoclonal antibodies or immunoreactive fragments thereof that are broadly crossreactive with influenza A virus of Group 1 including H1, H2, H5, H6, H8, H9, H11, H13, H16 or Group 2 including H3 and H7 as type specimens, or that show cross-Group reactivity. Some of the antibodies illustrated below bind to an epitope contained in the HA0 protein specifically and recognize the native trimeric form of HA, as well as the activated form.
Particularly important are bispecific antibodies and fragments thereof which are able to enhance the range of viral clades that can be bound specifically.
As is well understood in the art, non-immunoglobulin based proteins may have similar epitope recognition properties as antibodies and can also provide suitable embodiments, including binding agents based on fibronectin, transferrin or lipocalin. Nucleic acid based moieties, such as aptamers also have these binding properties.
In other aspects, the invention is directed to methods to use the binding moieties of the invention for passively inhibiting viral infection in subjects that are already exposed to the virus or that are already infected. The invention is also directed to recombinant materials and methods to produce antibodies or fragments.
The present invention provides useful binding moieties, including antibodies and fragments thereof as well as effective means to identify cells that secrete such antibodies so that the relevant coding sequences can be retrieved and stored for subsequent and facile recombinant production of such antibodies.
The antibodies or analogous binding moieties of the invention are useful for both prophylaxis and therapy. Thus, they may be used to protect a subject against challenge by the virus as well as for treatment of subjects that are already exposed or infected with influenza. The subjects of most ultimate interest are human subjects and for use in human subjects, human forms or humanized forms of the binding moieties which are traditional natural antibodies or immunoreactive fragments thereof are preferred. However, the antibodies containing appropriate binding characteristics as dictated by the CDR regions when used in studies in laboratory animals may retain non-human characteristics. The antibodies employed in the studies of the examples below, although done in mice, nevertheless contain both variable and constant regions which are human.
The subjects for which the binding moieties including antibodies of the invention are useful in therapy and prophylaxis include, in addition to humans, any subject that is susceptible to infection by flu. Thus, various mammals, such as bovine, porcine, ovine and other mammalian subjects including horses and household pets will benefit from the prophylactic and therapeutic use of these binding moieties. In addition, influenza is known to infect avian species which will also benefit from compositions containing the antibodies of the invention.
Methods of use for prophylaxis and therapy are conventional and generally well known. The antibodies or other binding moieties are typically provided by injection but oral vaccines are also understood to be effective. Dosage levels and timing of administration are easily optimized and within the skill of the art.
Human cells that secrete useful antibodies can be identified using, in particular, the CellSpot™ method described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,413,868, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, the method is able to screen individual cells obtained from human (or other) subjects in high throughput assays taking advantage of labeling with particulate labels and microscopic observation. In one illustrative embodiment, even a single cell can be analyzed for antibodies it secretes by allowing the secreted antibodies to be adsorbed on, or coupled to, a surface and then treating the surface with desired antigens each coupled to a distinctive particulate label. The footprint of a cell can therefore be identified with the aid of a microscope. Using this technique, millions of cells can be screened for desirable antibody secretions and even rare antibodies, such as those herein desirable for passive influenza immunization across strains can be recovered. Since human subjects have existing antibodies to at least some influenza strains, and since the antibodies obtained by the method of the invention bind a conserved sequence, these antibodies serve the purpose of addressing new strains as well as strains with which human populations have experience.
Methods to obtain suitable antibodies are not limited to the CellSpot™ technique, nor are they limited to human subjects. Cells that produce suitable antibodies can be identified by various means and the cells may be those of laboratory animals such as mice or other rodents. The nucleic acid sequences encoding these antibodies can be isolated and a variety of forms of antibodies produced, including chimeric and humanized forms of antibodies produced by non-human cells. In addition, recombinantly produced antibodies or fragments include single-chain antibodies or Fab or Fab2 regions of them. Human antibodies may also be obtained using hosts such as the XenoMouse® with a humanized immune system. Means for production of antibodies for screening for suitable binding characteristics are well known in the art.
Similarly, means to construct aptamers with desired binding patterns are also known in the art.
As noted above, antibodies or other binding moieties may bind the activated form, the inactivated form or both of the hemagglutinin protein. It is advantageous in some instances that the epitope is at the cleavage site of this protein as it is relatively conserved across strains, but preferably the binding moiety binds both the trimer and the activated form.
The cleavage site for various strains of influenza A and influenza B is known. For example, the above cited article by Bianchi, et al., shows in Table 1 the sequence around the cleavage site of several such strains:
aThe position of cleavage between HA1 and HA2 is indicated by the arrow.
bThe consensus is the same for both the Victoria and Yamagata lineages.
As indicated, strict consensus occurs starting with the arginine residue upstream of the cleavage site and thus preferred consensus sequences included in the test peptides of the invention have the sequence RGI/L/F FGAIAGFLE (SEQ ID NO:57). It may be possible to use only a portion of this sequence in the test peptides.
As noted above, once cells that secrete the desired antibodies have been identified, it is straightforward to retrieve the nucleotide sequences encoding them and to produce the desired antibodies on a large scale recombinantly. This also enables manipulation of the antibodies so that they can be produced, for example, as single-chain antibodies or in terms of their variable regions only.
The retrieved nucleic acids may be physically stored and recovered for later recombinant production and/or the sequence information as to the coding sequence for the antibody may be retrieved and stored to permit subsequent synthesis of the appropriate nucleic acids. The availability of the information contained in the coding sequences and rapid synthesis and cloning techniques along with known methods of recombinant production permits rapid production of needed antibodies in the event of a pandemic or other emergency.
For reference, the sequences of human constant regions of both heavy and light chains have been described and are set forth herein as SEQ ID NOS:1-3. In the above-referenced WO2011/160083, various monoclonal antibodies with variable regions of determined amino acid sequence and nucleotide coding sequences have been recovered that bind with varying degrees of affinity to HA protein of various strains of influenza. The structures of variable regions, both light and heavy chains, of those of particular interest herein are set forth for convenience herein as SEQ ID NOS:22-25. These antibodies include MAB8 and MAB53. MAB53 and MAB8 bind with particular affinity to H1; further, MAB53 binds tightly to H5, H7 and H9. MAB8 also binds H7 and H2. Neither of these antibodies binds strongly to H3, but MAB579 does bind H3 described herein. H7 and H3 are particularly attractive targets.
In more detail, each of these MABs binds to at least three different clades with reasonable or high affinity. MAB53 binds to HA0 from the H1, H9 and H7 clades and MAB8 binds to HA0 from H1, H7 clades and less strongly to and H3, as demonstrated by ELISA assay against HA0 protein. The affinities are in the nanomolar range. Reactivity to native trimer of HA from all the Group 1 clades was verified using HA expressed in HEK293 cells with antibody binding measured by flow cytometry.
These results were confirmed using an alternative assay system, the biolevel interferometry based binding assay designated FortéBio® biosensor. As measured by this more accurate assay, the affinities are as follows:
MAB53/H1=60 pM, H5=6 nM, H7=70 pM, H9=30 pM;
MAB8/H1=9 nM, H3=16 nM, H5=0.2 nM.
The additional specific antibodies identified in the present application, MAB383, MAB486, MAB579, MAB699, MAB700, MAB708, MAB710, MAB711 and MAB723 are represented by SEQ ID NOS:4-21 in terms of the amino acid sequences of their variable heavy chain and light chain. These antibodies bind with enhanced affinity to additional clades of influenza strains. For example, MAB579 binds with high affinity to both H3 and H7. Thus, these antibodies add to the repertoire of antibodies useful in prophylaxis and treatment of influenza.
Multiple technologies now exist for making a single antibody-like molecule that incorporates antigen specificity domains from two separate antibodies (bi-specific antibody). Thus, a single antibody with very broad strain reactivity can be constructed using the Fab domains of individual antibodies with broad reactivity to Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. Suitable technologies have been described by Macrogenics (Rockville, Md.), Micromet (Bethesda, Md.) and Merrimac (Cambridge, Mass.). (See, e.g., Orcutt K D, Ackerman M E, Cieslewicz M, Quiroz E, Slusarczyk A L, Frangioni J V, Wittrup K D. A modular IgG-scFv bispecific antibody topology, Protein Eng Des Sel. (2010) 23:221-228; Fitzgerald J, Lugovskoy A. Rational engineering of antibody therapeutics targeting multiple oncogene pathways. MAbs. (2011) 1:3(3); Baeuerle P A, Reinhardt C. Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies for cancer therapy. Cancer Res. (2009) 69:4941-4944.)
Thus, it is particularly useful to provide antibodies or other binding moieties which bind to multiple types of hemagglutinin protein by constructing bispecific antibodies. Particularly useful combinations are those that combine the binding specificity of MAB53 (H1, H5, H9) with MAB579 (H3, H7).
All of the antibodies of the present invention include at least one of the binding specificities of the newly disclosed antibodies described above. These may be combined with various other antibodies, including those that were described in the above-referenced WO2011/160083 as well as other members of the new group of antibodies disclosed herein. All of the possible combinations of such binding specificities are within the scope of the present invention.
While MAB53 binds with high affinity to HA0, it does not bind HA1 implying binding to the complementary HA2 fragment, which binding was confirmed. As MAB53 does not bind to HA0 when tested by Western blot, it is assumed that the dominant epitope is at least in part conformational. It was been found that MAB8 and MAB53 bind to the same or nearby epitopes as demonstrated by their ability to compete with each other for binding to the HA0 protein of the H1 clade.
All of the antibodies disclosed herein, including those previously disclosed in the above-referenced WO2011/160083 bind to the native HA trimer expressed on the surface of HA transfected cells. This was verified using an HA-encoding plasmid provided by S. Galloway and D. Steinhauer of Emory University. That is, the trimer displayed on the cell surface of the clades recognized by the various MAB's of the invention is recognized by these MAB's.
It was shown that MAB53 and MAB8 differ in that MAB8 is released from the HA0 protein when the pH is lowered to 6, whereas MAB53 is not. This difference is significant as it appears predictive of neutralizing capability. In tests for the ability to neutralize H1N1 viral infection in a plaque reduction assay in MDCK target cells, low doses of MAB53 of 1-5 μg/ml neutralized infection by H1N1, by H7N3, H5N1 and H9N2. However, MAB8 does not neutralize infection by these strains. Thus, neutralizing strains may be preferentially selected by washing bound MAB or fragment at pH 6 during the primary screen, thus removing from HA0 MAB's that are unlikely to remain bound as the antibody-virus complex enters the cell via the endosomal compartment and thus will be expected to have reduced ability to neutralize the virus. For example, in the CellSpot method HA0 may be bound to solid support (fluorescent beads) and captured by the MAB or a mixture of MAB's, then washed at pH 6.
It was also shown that mice pretreated with graded doses of MAB53 survive challenge with otherwise lethal titers of H1N1 and H5N1 viruses with 100% protection against H1N1 challenge. The potency is comparable to a prior art antibody described by Crucell which does not show activity against Group 2 strains. Throsby, M., (supra) 3:e3942. The Crucell antibodies are heterosubtypic neutralizing monoclonal antibodies cross-protective against H5N1 and H1N1 recovered from human IgM+ memory B cells. MAB53 also provided full protection at 10 mg/kg; 90% survived at 2 mg/kg and 50% survived at 0.4 mg/kg. Where challenge by H5N1 was substituted for challenge by H1N1, for MAB53, 10 mg/kg gave 80% survival; 2 mg/kg gave 60% survival and 0.4 mg/kg gave 50% survival.
MAB53 and antibodies that bind to the same epitope under the same conditions, i.e., then remain bound when the pH is lowered to 6, are effective as passive vaccines suitable for protection of populations against epidemics and pandemics, and for prophylactic or therapeutic use against seasonal influenza for patients with a weakened immune system. Combinations of the epitope binding region of MAB53 with the high affinity binding epitopes of the antibodies of the present invention are particularly useful in constructing bispecific antibodies. This clearly permits, for example, effective binding of H7, H3 and H1 in the same antibody when MAB579 binding regions are included in the antibody. This is shown in Table 2 which provides the IC50's for various strains of influenza hemagglutinin protein shown by MAB579.
These values were obtained in the MDCK monolayer microneutralization assay. A graphical representation of the affinity of MAB579 for various strains is also shown in
In addition to bispecific antibodies per se, the invention contemplates the use of the heavy chain only in constructs for neutralization of viral infection; such antibodies may also be bispecific. It is understood in the art that specificity is mostly conferred by the heavy chain variable regions, and in some stances, heavy chains alone have been successful as active ingredients in vaccines. Alternatively, the heavy chain of appropriate specificity may be associated with various forms of light chain to enhance the affinity or ability to neutralize virus.
It is particularly noted that the CDR3 region of the heavy chains of the antibodies described herein is extended and contains multiple tyrosine residues. It is understood that such tyrosine residues may be sulfonated as a posttranslational event. Thus, also part of the invention are vaccines which comprise the CDR3 regions of the heavy chains of MAB579, MAB699, MAB700, MAB708, MAB710, MAB711 or MAB723 wherein one or more of the tyrosine residues in said region is optionally sulfonated. These regions with or without sulfonation may also be used alone as passive vaccines. The sulfonation of the CDR3 region is consistent with criteria for sulfonation as described by Monigatti, F., et al., Bioinformatics (2002) 18:769-770. Other instances where CDR3 regions of heavy chains have been used successfully alone in neutralization of viral infection are described in Pejchal, R., et al., PNAS (2010) 107:11483-11488 and by Liu, L., et al., J. Virol. (2011) 85:8467-8476.
As used herein, the term “antibody” includes immunoreactive fragments of traditional antibodies even if, on occasion, “fragments” are mentioned redundantly. The antibodies, thus, include Fab fragments, Fv single-chain antibodies which contain a substantially only variable regions, bispecific antibodies and their various fragmented forms that still retain immunospecificity and proteins in general that mimic the activity of “natural” antibodies by comprising amino acid sequences or modified amino acid sequences (i.e., pseudopeptides) that approximate the activity of variable regions of more traditional naturally occurring antibodies.
These are presented in the following order:
1. Amino acid sequences of the constant region of human IgG1 heavy chain, human constant kappa and human constant lambda;
2. Heavy and light chain amino acid sequences of the variable regions of the heavy and light chains of MAB 383, 486, 579, 699, 700,708, 710, 711 and 723 (The CDR regions are underlined in MAB's 579, 699, 700, 708, 710, 711 and 723.);
3. Heavy and light chain variable region amino acid sequences of MAB8 and MAB53 described in WO2011/160083 (The LC sequences shown in '083 also contained constant region and this has been deleted.);
4. Nucleotide sequences encoding the constant region of human IgG1 heavy chain, human constant kappa and human constant lambda;
5. Nucleotide sequences encoding heavy and light chain amino acid sequences of the variable regions of the heavy and light chains of MAB 383, 486, 579, 699, 700,708, 710, 711 and 723;
6. Nucleotide sequences encoding heavy and light chain variable region amino acid sequences of MAB8 and MAB53.
With respect to the indicated CDR regions, it should be noted that there is more than one system for identifying CDRs. Most frequently used is the Kabat system originally set forth in Wu, T. T., et al., J. Exp. Med. (1970) 132:211-250. Kabat is a widely adopted system which identifies specific positions as associated with CDRs. An additional system, the Chothia numbering scheme provides slightly different results. It is described in Al-Lazikani, B., et al., J. Molec. Biol. (1997) 273:927-948. Depending on which system is used, slightly different results for CDRs are indicated. For example, in MAB53 the heavy chain CDR according to Kabat is KYAIN whereas the Clothia system designates GGIIRKYAIN. The heavy chain CDR2 region has an additional G at the N-terminus and the CDR3 an additional AR at the N-terminus. For the light chain, the CDR designations are identical in both systems.
Some criticism has been leveled at both systems by various workers; therefore, it is understood that the CDR regions as designated herein and in the claims may vary slightly. As long as the resulting variable regions retain their binding ability, the precise location of the CDR regions is not significant, and those regions designated in the claims are to be considered to include CDRs identified by any accepted system.
INAGNGHTKYSQRFKGRVTITRDTSARTTYMELRSLTSEDTALYFCARGP
ETYYYDKTNWLNSHPDEYFQHWGHGTQVTVSS
ASSLESGVPSRFSGSGSGTEFTLTISSLQPDDFATYYCQEYNNDSPLTFG
INAGNGKTKYPPKFRGRVTITRDTSATTVDMHLSSLTSEDTAVYFCARGP
ESYYYDRSDWLNSHPDEYFQYWGQGTLVIVSS
ASQLESGVPSRFSGSGSGTEFTLTINSLQPDDFATYYCQLYNVYSPLTFG
INAGNGKTKYSQKFQGRVIVTRDTSASTAYMELSSLTSEDTAVYYCARGP
ETYYYDSSNWLNSHPDEYLQYWGQGTPVTVSS
ASTLESGVPSRFSGSGSGTEFTLTISSLQPDDFATYYCQEYNNNSPLTFG
INAGNGKTKYSQKFQGRVIVTRDTSANTAYMELSSLTSEDTAVYYCARGP
ETYYYDSSNWLNSHPDEYFQHWGQGTPVTVSS
ASSLESGVPSRFSGSGSGTEFTLTISSLQPDDFATYYCQEYNNNSPLTFG
INAGNGKTKYPQKFKGRVTITRDTLARTVNIHLSSLTSEDTAVYFCARGP
DSYYYDRNDWLNSHPDEYFQHWGQGTVVIVSS
ASNLESGVPSRFSGSGSGTEFTLTISSLQPDDFATYYCQLYNVHLITFGG
INAANGHTKYSRKLRSRVTIKRDTSARTSYMELSSLGSEDTAVYYCARGP
ETYYFDKTNWLNSHPDEYFQHWGQGTLVTVSS
ASNLESGVPARFSGSGSGTEFTLTISSLQPDDFATYYCQEYNNDSPLILG
INAGNGKVKYPRKLQGRITITRDVSATTVHMELRSLTSEDTGLYYCARGP
ESYFFDTSNHLNSHPDEYFQFWGQGTLVTVSS
ASNLESGVPSRFSGSGSGTEFTLTISSLQPDDFATYYCQEYNNNSPLTFG
AGGCCAGCACAGGGAGGGAGGGTGTCTGCTGGAAGCCAGGCTCAGCGCTC
CTGCCTGGACGCATCCCGGCTATGCAGTCCCAGTCCAGGGCAGCAAGGCA
GGCCCCGTCTGCCTCTTCACCCGGAGGCCTCTGCCCGCCCCACTCATGCT
CAGGGAGAGGGTCTTCTGGCTTTTTCCCCAGGCTCTGGGCAGGCACAGGC
TAGGTGCCCCTAACCCAGGCCCTGCACACAAAGGGGCAGGTGCTGGGCTC
AGACCTGCCAAGAGCCATATCCGGGAGGACCCTGCCCCTGACCTAAGCCC
ACCCCAAAGGCCAAACTCTCCACTCCCTCAGCTCGGACACCTTCTCTCCT
CCCAGATTCCAGTAACTCCCAATCTTCTCTCTGCAGAGCCCAAATCTTGT
GCCCTCCAGCTCAAGGCGGGACAGGTGCCCTAGAGTAGCCTGCATCCAGG
GACAGGCCCCAGCCGGGTGCTGACACGTCCACCTCCATCTCTTCCTCAGC
CGCTGTACCAACCTCTGTCCCTACAGGGCAGCCCCGAGAACCACAGGTGT
The following examples are offered to illustrate but not to limit the invention.
The affinity of MAB53 was reported in the above cited PCT publication. This antibody binds HA strongly from clades H5, H7, H1 and H9, with less affinity for H2 and H3. MAB579 binds HA with high affinity with respect to H7 and H3.
MAB's 486 and 579 were tested for inhibition of infection by H1N1 and H3N2 (A/Perth/16/2009) and plaque formation in MDCK cell monolayers in the presence or absence of trypsin in the initial infection phase. MAB486 and pAb xCP (a rabbit polyclonal raised against the cleavage site consensus sequence) neutralize H1N1 (A/California/04/2009) only in the absence of trypsin as shown in
The ability of MAB53 to neutralize infection was previously reported, but a comparison of the affinities and EC50 for in vitro neutralization are compared to those for the Crucell monoclonal antibodies CR6261 in Table 3 below.
The values for EC50 were obtained as described above.
Pepscan CLIPS™ Technology was used to map the binding sites of MAB53 and MAB579. About 6,000 unique peptides of varying lengths and with varying length connecters to constrain the ends of each peptide to mimic native structure were synthesized for H1 and for H3. Binding to the stalk region by MAB53 and MAB579 was confirmed using rabbit sera to globular head or stalk as competitors and by direct binding to peptides from the stalk region. As noted above, MAB486 binds both Group 1 and Group 2 but only in the preactivated state before protease cleavage of HA0 to disulfide linked HA1 and HA2. It was concluded that the epitope for cross-clade binding is a discontinuous epitope spanning two monomers of the native trimeric HA0.
The strains used in these experiments were:
H1N1: A/CA/04/09;
H5N1: A/Vietnam/1203/04/HPAI;
H3N2: A/Perth/16/09;
H7N3: A/Red Knot/NJ/1523470/06.
To test prophylaxis, MAB53 was provided to mice as a single intraperitoneal dose of 10 mg/kg at Day −1 which was followed at Day 0 by a dose of virus 10 times the LD50 delivered intranasally. The potency of MAB53 was determined to exhibit EC50 at 0.4 mg/kg as compared to the Crucell antibody CR6261 which is reported to exhibit an EC50 of 1-1.5 mg/kg (Koudstaal, W., et al., J. Infect. Dis. (2009) 200:1870-1873).
To test therapeutic effectiveness, MAB was given as a single intraperitoneal dose of 10 mg/kg at Day +3 for most strains or at Day +1 for H7N3. MAB53 was fully effective with respect to H1N1 and H5N1 whereas essentially all control mice were dead by Day 10. MAB579 was essentially fully effective against H3N2 and H7N3 whereas virtually all control mice were dead before Day 10.
Weight loss was also measured and declines were no worse than 20% in the treated mice.
In comparison to treatment with Tamiflu® (oseltamivir phosphate), mice (10 per group) were anesthetized and infected intranasally with 10 times the LD50 dose of virus (H1N1 Influenza A/Ca/04/09). MAB53 (or control isotype-matched human IgG) was given i.p. at Day +1 post-infection. Tamiflu® was given by oral gavage twice daily for 4 days starting on Day +1 post-infection. Both mortality and morbidity (assessed by weight loss) were far more severe for the Tamiflu® cohort compared to the MAB53 cohort.
For controls, all of the mice were dead by eight days post infection. For those treated with Tamiflu®, all but two mice were dead before eight days post infection; these two mice survived at least to Day 14. In the group treated with MAB53, eight of the ten mice survived past Day 8 to Day 14.
With respect to weight loss, the control group declined in weight to 70% of their initial weight after eight days. The declines in weight were reversed at Day 4 for the mice treated with MAB53 and the original weight was exceeded by Day 14. In the Tamiflu® treated mice, weight loss was reversed by Day 6 but only 92% of the original weight was attained by Day 14.
Pharmacokinetics were also examined in mice for MAB53 and MAB579. These show a half-life in mice of about 7-14 days corresponding to a half-life in humans of 3-4 weeks. This corresponds to that typical for an IgG1 κ MAB. The bispecific antibody MAB579/53Bi (see Example 5) shows a similar half-life.
The construction of MAB579/53Bi provides an scFv portion of MAB53 coupled to the constant region of MAB579 as shown in
In vivo efficacy was measured as described generally in Example 4 with the results as shown in
As shown in
Similar results were obtained in the analogous protocol for mice infected with a Group 2 representative Philippines 2/82 (H2N3) as shown in
This application claims benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 61/567,046 filed 5 Dec. 2011 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US12/68037 | 12/5/2012 | WO | 00 | 6/5/2014 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61567046 | Dec 2011 | US |
