Antifoulant control process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6294078
  • Patent Number
    6,294,078
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 7, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 25, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A process is provided by the invention which comprises: (a) providing a tubular reactor having an inlet and an outlet, a furnace for heating the reactor, and a cooler having an inlet in communication with the reactor outlet and also having an outlet; (b) introducing a substantially constant flow of feed gas comprising steam to the reactor inlet while the reactor is heated by the furnace to produce a predetermined and substantially constant reactor outlet temperature; and (c) controlling, during at least a portion of (b), the concentration of an antifoulant in the feed gas based on cooler outlet temperature.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates to treatment of a tubular reactor (i.e. a thermal cracking reactor) with antifoulant.




In a thermal cracking reactor, antifoulants alleviate the undesirable formation of coke and carbon dioxide during thermal cracking of hydrocarbons. Heretofore, there has been no procedure by which the concentration of antifoulant in the feed gas is controlled to ensure proper treatment of the reactor without unnecessary waste of antifoulant.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is, therefore, an object of the invention to provide a process in which the concentration of antifoulant in a feed gas as introduced to a tubular reactor is controlled as discussed above.




The above object is realized by a process comprising: (a) providing a tubular reactor having an inlet and an outlet, a furnace for heating the reactor, and a cooler having an inlet in communication with the reactor outlet and also having an outlet; (b) introducing a substantially constant flow of feed gas comprising steam to the reactor inlet while the reactor is heated by the furnace to produce a predetermined and substantially constant reactor outlet temperature; and (c) controlling, during at least a portion of (b), the concentration of an antifoulant in the feed gas based on cooler outlet temperature.




The process of the invention can be applied to a feed gas comprising only steam (pretreatment) and/or to a feed gas comprising steam and at least one saturated hydrocarbon (cracking, assuming the reactor outlet temperature in (b) is in a suitable range).




The invention relies upon the discovery that the cooler outlet temperature will vary depending upon the amount of excess antifoulant in excess of that required for treatment of the tubular reactor) in effluent flowing from the tubular reactor to the cooler. An increase n excess antifoulant, or simply the presence of excess antifoulant as opposed to no excess, results in a rise in cooler outlet temperature. According to a preferred embodiment, proper treatment of the tubular reactor without unnecessary waste of antifoulant is ensured by controlling the antifoulant concentration in (c) so as to maintain the cooler outlet temperature above an initial cooler outlet temperature but below an upper limit.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING




The FIGURE is a schematic diagram of a system for performing the process of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Referring to the FIGURE, a hydrocarbon source


10


supplies at least one saturated hydrocarbon as a gas, preferably having 2-8 carbon atoms per molecule. Suitable saturated hydrocarbons include, for example, ethane, propane, butane, and mixtures thereof. A steam source


12


supplies steam, preferably at a temperature of about 300-500° F. An antifoulant source


14


supplies antifoulant as a liquid. Suitable antifoulants include, but are not limited to, tetrahydrocarbyltin compounds, preferably tetra-n-butyltin. The tetrahydrocarbyltin compound can be combined with a silicon compound, such as hexamethyl disiloxane. A more complete list of suitable saturated hydrocarbons and antifoulants is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,904.




Valve


16


controls flow of hydrocarbon through line


18


, valve controls flow of steam through line


22


, and diaphragm motor valve


24


controls flow of antifoulant through line


26


.




Tubular reactor


28


is contained in a furnace


30


which heats the tubular reactor so as to produce a desired reactor outlet temperature. The reactor outlet is in communication with the inlet of cooler


32


through line


34


. Cooler


32


is a heat exchanger (i.e. shell and tube or double pipe) which employs a suitable coolant fluid, and is sometimes referred to as a TLE (Transfer Line Exchanger). Line


36


extends from and is in communication with the outlet of cooler


32


.




Temperature transducer


38


detects the reactor outlet temperature and generates an electrical signal representative thereof which is transmitted to a suitable monitor (not shown) via signal line


40


. Temperature transducer


42


detects the cooler outlet temperature and generates an electrical signal representative thereof which is transmitted to computer and flow indicator and controller (hereafter denoted as computer/controller)


44


via signal line


46


. The box represents the computer. Flow transducer


48


detects the flow rate of antifoulant through line


26


and generates an electrical signal representative thereof which is transmitted to computer/controller


44


via signal line


50


. Computer/controller


44


processes temperature and flow data (as discussed further below) from transducers


42


and


48


, respectively, and generates an electrical control signal which is transmitted via signal line


52


to I/P transducer


54


. I/P transducer


54


converts the electrical signal to a pneumatic signal which is transmitted via signal line


56


to valve


24


. Control of valve


24


by computer/controller


44


therefore controls the flow rate of antifoulant through line


26


.




Automatic control of the antifoulant flow rate can be implemented during substantially all or at least a portion of a period, hereafter referred to as a constant ROT (Reactor Outlet Temperature) period, in which a substantially constant flow of feed gas (comprising only steam for pretreatment or steam and at least one saturated hydrocarbon for cracking) is introduced to the inlet of tubular reactor


28


while the reactor outlet temperature is held substantially constant. An initial cooler outlet temperature at approximately the commencement of a constant ROT period or thereafter during such period is designated as T


1


and any subsequent cooler outlet temperature is designated as T


2


·ΔT=T


2


−T


1


.




Computer/controller


44


calculates ΔT at periodic intervals, generally about every five minutes. For each calculation, computer/controller


44


determines if ΔT is below a preselected minimum ΔT (which is greater than zero), above a preselected maximum ΔT, or within the acceptable ΔT range defined by the minimum and maximum ΔT. If ΔT corresponding to a current flow rate is below the minimum ΔT, a new and higher antifoulant flow rate is calculated using a suitable algorithm in order to raise the concentration of antifoulant in the feed gas. If ΔT is above the maximum ΔT, a new and lower antifoulant flow rate is calculated using the algorithm in order to lower the concentration of antifoulant in the feed gas. The algorithm has the ΔT value and current flow rate as input variables. Generally speaking, the magnitude of the difference between the calculated new flow rate and the current flow rate is proportional to how far ΔT is below the minimum ΔT or how far ΔT is above the maximum ΔT. If ΔT is within the range defined by the minimum ΔT and the maximum ΔT, the current flow rate and corresponding antifoulant concentration in the feed gas is unchanged. Accordingly, antifoulant concentration in the feed gas is automatically controlled so as to maintain ΔT within a range having a lower limit greater than zero, minimum ΔT, and an upper limit, maximum ΔT.




Typical operation of the illustrated system will now be described, wherein pretreatment is followed by cracking. Feed gas flow to the inlet of tubular reactor


28


is assumed to be substantially constant.




Valve


16


is closed and valve


20


is opened to the extent necessary to establish a desired flow rate of steam through line


22


, and into and through a portion of line


18


to the inlet of tubular reactor


28


. The feed gas to tubular reactor


28


, therefore, comprises only steam. A first constant ROT period is started at a reactor outlet temperature in the range of about 1000-1300° F. A first T


1


is determined at approximately the commencement of the first constant ROT period. Valve


24


is opened to the extent necessary to establish an antifoulant flow rate which gives a preselected concentration of antifoulant in the feed gas of about 25-200 ppm. The term “ppm” as used herein assumes parts are in moles. Automatic control of antifoulant concentration is implemented during the first constant ROT period employing a minimum ΔT in the range of about 1-20° F. and a maximum ΔT in the range of about 50-150° F. The first constant ROT period and automatic control of antifoulant concentration ends after typically about 1 hour.




With valve


24


set at its last position in the first constant ROT period, the reactor outlet temperature is ramped to a temperature in the range of about 1400-1600° F. over a period of about 2-3 hours. A second constant ROT period starts and a second T


1


is determined at approximately the commencement of such period. Automatic control of antifoulant concentration is implemented during the second constant ROT period employing a minimum ΔT in the range of about 1-20° F. and a maximum ΔT in the range of about 50-150° F. The second constant ROT period and automatic control of antifoulant concentration ends after typically about 1 hour.




With valve


24


set at its last position in the second constant ROT period, the reactor outlet temperature is ramped upward about 50° F. to a desired cracking temperature in the range of about 1475-1650° F. Valve


16


is opened to the extent necessary to establish a desired flow rate of hydrocarbon through line


18


. The flow rate of steam through line


22


is reduced so that the flow rate of feed gas, now comprising a mixture of steam and at least one saturated hydrocarbon, to tubular reactor


28


remains the same. The weight ratio of steam to hydrocarbon is preferably about 0.2:1-1:1.




A third constant ROT period starts as soon as the above cracking temperature is stabilized and a third T


1


is determined at approximately the commencement of the third constant ROT period or shortly thereafter. Automatic control of antifoulant concentration is implemented, employing a minimum ΔT in the range of about 1-10° F. and a maximum ΔT in the range of about 20-80° F. Automatic control can be continued for a predetermined amount of time, i.e. 1-10 days, (after which valve


24


can be left in its last position during automatic control), or until it is decided to close valve


24


and stop the flow of antifoulant when the inner surfaces of tubular reactor


28


are judged to be “passivated”; that is, inactive in catalyzing coke and carbon monoxide formation. A state of passivation is determined by monitoring the pressure drop across tubular reactor


28


and the concentration of carbon monoxide in the reactor effluent. The reactor effluent contains steam, the desired unsaturated hydrocarbon product resulting from the cracking of the saturated hydrocarbon, and also unconverted saturated hydrocarbon. Cooled reactor effluent flowing through line


36


frequently goes to additional coolers which are not shown.




An example will now be described to further illustrate the invention. This example should not be construed to limit the invention in any manner. Equipment included a tubular reactor, a furnace, and a cooler for receiving reactor effluent therethrough.




The example pertains to manual control (as opposed to automatic control described above) of antifoulant concentration in a feed gas comprising steam and ethane. The flow rate of ethane was 8 metric tons per hr. and the flow rate of steam was 2.4 metric tons per hr. to give a steam to ethane ratio of 0.3. The constant flow of feed gas was introduced to the inlet of the tubular reactor while the reactor was heated by the furnace to produce a constant reactor outlet temperature of 1550° F. At approximately the commencement of this constant ROT period, T


1


was determined to be 696° F. Antifoulant, comprising a liquid mixture of tetra-n-butyltin and hexamethyl disiloxane, was injected into the flow of feed gas at an initial concentration of 162 ppm. Minimum ΔT was to be at least above zero and maximum ΔT was about 35° F.




The antifoulant concentration was gradually reduced to 25 ppm over 3 hours, at which time ΔT was 38° F. At 3.5 hours, ΔT had risen to 42° F., above the maximum ΔT by 7° F. Therefore, the concentration was reduced to 20 ppm. However, at 4 hours, ΔT had risen to 44° F. The concentration was accordingly reduced to 15 ppm. At 4.5 hours, ΔT had dropped to 43° F. The concentration was reduced to 10 ppm, and at 6 hours ΔT had dropped to 34° F. This is within the desired range defined by minimum ΔT and maximum ΔT. The concentration was left at the 10 ppm level for 13 more hours.




The above example clearly illustrates how controlling the antifoulant concentration in accordance with the invention ensures proper treatment of the tubular reactor with antifoulant without wasting antifoulant.




Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.



Claims
  • 1. A process for controlling the concentration of an antifoulant in a feed stream introduced to a reactor suitable for passivating the inner surfaces of the reactor and the reactor has an inlet and an outlet, comprising:(a) heating the reactor with a furnace; (b) providing a substantially constant flow of feed gas comprising steam; (c) introducing the feed gas to the reactor inlet while the reactor is heated by the furnace such that reactor effluent flows from the reactor outlet and such that a predetermined and substantially constant reactor outlet temperature is produced; (d) introducing the effluent from the reactor to an inlet of a cooler having an outlet such that the effluent flows through the cooler and exits the cooler and such that a cooler outlet temperature is produced which is less than the reactor outlet temperature; (e) designating an initial cooler outlet temperature as T1 at approximately the commencement of (d) or thereafter during (d) and designating any subsequent cooler outlet temperature as T2, wherein T2−T1=ΔT; (f) introducing the antifoulant into the feed gas after T1 is designated in (e) at a point prior to the introduction of feed gas into the reactor; (g) controlling, during at least a portion of(c), the concentration of the antifoulant in the feed gas so as to maintain ΔT substantially within a range having a lower limit greater than zero, minimum ΔT, and an upper limit, maximum ΔT.
  • 2. A process as recited in claim 1 wherein the feed gas comprises only steam.
  • 3. A process as recited in claim 2 wherein minimum ΔT is in the range of about 1-20° F. and maximum ΔT is in the range of about 50-150° F.
  • 4. A process as recited in claim 1 wherein the feed gas further comprises at least one saturated hydrocarbon which is cracked in the reactor during (c) to produce the corresponding unsaturated hydrocarbon.
  • 5. A process as recited in claim 4 wherein minimum ΔT is in the range of about 1-10° F. and maximum ΔT is in the range of about 20-80° F.
  • 6. A process as recited in claim 1 wherein in (g) antifoulant concentration is controlled automatically using a computer/controller.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/083,720, filed May 22, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,113,774.

US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
4376694 Lohr et al. Mar 1983
4420343 Sliwka Dec 1983
4775459 Forester Oct 1988
5734098 Kraus et al. Mar 1998
5851377 Bush Dec 1998
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/083720 May 1998 US
Child 09/611606 US