Antimicrobial peptide stimulating cleansing composition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11633451
  • Patent Number
    11,633,451
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 16, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 25, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A topical cleansing composition for stimulating the production of antimicrobial peptides on the skin is disclosed. The topical cleansing composition includes an active ingredient comprising one or more of a natural extract and a polypeptide; one or more surfactants; and water. The topical cleansing composition increases the concentration of antimicrobial peptides on skin, as compared to an otherwise identical topical composition without the active ingredient.
Description
BACKGROUND

Skin disinfecting and cleansing compositions have become increasingly popular in the health care industry as well as with the general public for providing antimicrobial effectiveness to the skin without irritation.


Recent microbiome studies have analyzed the chemical make-up of the skin and the potential for disinfecting and cleansing compositions to improve both skin defense against germs and skin's innate immunity. This includes germ control through both internal and external methods. External methods include hygiene products that directly kill or slow germ growth. Internal methods include improving an organism's immune system to fight germs itself.


Antimicrobial peptides (“AMPs”), also known as host defense peptides, comprise a wide range of natural and synthetic peptides that are made of oligopeptides containing a varying number of amino acids. AMPs are essential components of host defense against infections present in all domains of life. AMPs are produced by all complex organisms and have diverse and intricate antimicrobial activities. As a whole, these peptides demonstrate a broad range of antiviral and antibacterial activities through an array of modes of action. AMPs have been found to kill Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, certain viruses, parasites and fungi. Some research suggests that they can also enhance the internal immunity of complex organisms against a broad range of bacteria and viruses. In addition to the innate immune system present in all animals, vertebrates evolved an adaptive immune system based on specific recognition of antigens. Increasing evidence suggests that AMPS released in response to an invasion of microbial can activate adaptive immunity by attracting antigen-presenting dendritic cells to the invasion site.


While traditional soap and lotion formulations can stimulate the production of AMPS on the skin, the levels thereof are not sufficient to produce the desired effects of long lasting germ defense and innate immunity on the skin. It is thus desirable to design a new soap and/or lotion composition that is safe for topical use that stimulates the production AMPS to levels that help the skin fight germs and maintain continued immunity.


SUMMARY

Some exemplary embodiments are directed to a topical cleansing composition for stimulating the production of antimicrobial peptides on the skin. The composition comprises about 0.02 wt. % to about 10.0 wt. % of an active ingredient, at least about 1.0 wt. % of one or more surfactants, and water. The active ingredient comprises one or more of a natural extract and a polypeptide. The topical composition increases the concentration of antimicrobial peptides on skin, as compared to an otherwise identical topical composition without the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, the natural extract is one or more of a plant extract, a seed extract and a fruit extract. The seed extract may be at least one of linseed extract, flaxseed extract, hemp seed extract, grape seed extract, and grapefruit seed extract.


In some exemplary embodiments, the active ingredient is a polypeptide, such as at least one of an oligopeptide and a hexapeptide.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical cleansing composition comprises about 0.05 to about 5.0 wt. %, or about 0.1 to about 1.0 wt. % active ingredient, based on the weight of the total composition.


Some exemplary embodiments of the present topical cleansing composition include one or more surfactants selected from the group consisting of betaines such as cocamidoproyl betaine, sulfonates and sulfates such as sodium laureth sulfate or alkylbenzene sulfonates, cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, lauryl gluocoside, PEG-80 sorbitan laurate, di-alkyl sulfosuccinate, lignosulfonates, disodium cocoamphodiacetate, lauryl glucoside, and PEG-80 sodium laurate. In some exemplary embodiments, the topical cleansing composition comprises at least one primary surfactant and at least one secondary surfactant. In some exemplary embodiments, the primary surfactant is sodium, laureth sulfate. In some exemplary embodiments, the primary surfactant is one or more of cocamidopropyl betaine, disodium cocoamphodiacetate, cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, and lauryl glucoside.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition comprises one or more humectants, selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,4-dihydroxyhexane, 1,2,6-hexanetriol, sorbitol, butylene glycol, caprylyl glycol, propanediols, such as methyl propane diol, dipropylene glycol, triethylene glycol, glycerin (glycerol), polyethylene glycols, ethoxydiglycol, polyethylene sorbitol, and combinations thereof. The humectant may be present in an amount up to about 20.0 wt. %, based on the weight of the total composition.


The topical composition increases antimicrobial peptide concentration by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition without the active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition increases the concentration of HBD-1 by at least about 10%, relative to an otherwise identical topical composition without said active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition increases the concentration of HBD-2 by at least about 5%, relative to an otherwise identical topical composition without said active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition increases the concentration of HBD-3 by at least about 5%, relative to an otherwise identical topical composition without said active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition increases the concentration of LL-37 by at least about 5%, relative to an otherwise identical topical composition without said active ingredient.


In various exemplary embodiments, the topical composition decreases the concentration of IL-8 by at least about 5%, relative to an otherwise identical topical composition without said active ingredient.


Some exemplary embodiments are directed to a method of skin treatment to increase the production of antimicrobial peptides on the skin. The method comprises applying a topical cleansing composition to a skin surface, wherein the topical composition includes about 0.02 wt. % to about 10.0 wt. % of an active ingredient and at least about 1.0 wt. % of one or more surfactants, with the balance up to 100 wt. % being water. The active ingredient comprises one or more of a natural extract and a polypeptide. The topical composition increases the concentration of antimicrobial peptides on skin, as compared to an otherwise identical topical soap composition without the active ingredient. The method further includes washing the cleansing composition off with water.


Some exemplary embodiments are directed to a skin treatment composition comprising about 0.02 wt. % to about 10.0 wt. % of an active ingredient comprising one or more of a natural extract and a polypeptide, at least about 1.0 wt. % of one or more surfactants, and about 0.01 wt. % to about 10.0 wt. % of a humectant, with the balance up to 100 wt. % being water.


Further exemplary embodiments are directed to a topical lotion composition for increasing the innate immunity of the skin comprising about 0.02 wt. % to 10.0 wt. % of an active ingredient comprising one or more of a natural extract and a polypeptide, at least about 0.1 wt. % of an oil, and about 0.01 wt. % to about 5.0 wt. % of a viscosity modifier, with the balance up to 100% being water.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 graphically illustrates HBD-1 concentrations after treatment with various concentrations of Decorinyl and Pamitoyl Pentapeptide-3.



FIG. 2 graphically illustrates HBD-2 concentrations after treatment with various concentrations of Decorinyl and Pamitoyl Pentapeptide-3.



FIG. 3 graphically illustrates HBD-3 concentrations after treatment with various concentrations of Decorinyl and Pamitoyl Pentapeptide-3.



FIG. 4 graphically illustrates HBD-1 concentrations after treatment with 0.1% and 1.0% Lipigenine™.



FIG. 5 graphically illustrates HBD-2 concentrations after treatment with 0.1% and 1.0% Lipigenine™.



FIG. 6 graphically illustrates HBD-3 concentrations after treatment with 0.1% and 1.0% Lipigenine™.



FIG. 7 graphically illustrates LL-37 concentrations after treatment with 0.1% and 1.0% Lipigenine™.



FIG. 8 graphically illustrates IL-8 concentrations after treatment with 0.1% and 1.0% Lipigenine™.



FIG. 9 graphically illustrates HBD-1 concentrations after treatment with various ingredients.



FIG. 10 graphically illustrates HBD-2 concentrations after treatment with various ingredients.



FIG. 11 graphically illustrates HBD-3 concentrations after treatment with various ingredients.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this application pertains. Although other methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein may be used in the practice or testing of the exemplary embodiments, exemplary suitable methods and materials are described below. In case of conflict, the present specification including definitions will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting of the general inventive concepts.


The terminology as set forth herein is for description of the exemplary embodiments only and should not be construed as limiting the application as a whole. Unless otherwise specified, “a,” “an,” “the,” and “at least one” are used interchangeably. Furthermore, as used in the description of the application and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are inclusive of their plural forms, unless contradicted by the context surrounding such.


The phrase “statistically significant” means p<0.05 for a test composition vs. a control that does not contain the active ingredient. The analysis is completed using 1) a T-test (a statistical examination of two population means) when only comparing one test article vs. one control); or 2) an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test when comparing two or more test articles vs. controls.


The phrase “topical composition” means a composition suitable for application directly to a surface, such as the surface of a human or animal body, including skin, and/or other surfaces, such as hair and nails.


The terms “polypeptide” and “polypeptides” as used herein refer to a chain of amino acids with two or more peptide bonds. In this way, these terms are meant to encompass both oligopeptides (which are generally considered to be peptide chains with between two and ten amino acids) as well as polypeptides (which are generally considered to be peptide chains with more than 10 amino acids).


The general inventive concepts relate to a topical composition that contains an AMP-stimulating active ingredient, including a natural extract and/or one or more polypeptides. The introduction of the active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, the active ingredient is derived from a natural extract, such as a plant extract, a fruit extract, and/or a seed extract, produced from the hydrolysis of natural proteins. Thus, the natural extracts may themselves comprise one or more peptides and/or polypeptides or the active ingredient may comprise polypeptide(s) independently. Non-limiting examples of natural extracts may include seed extracts, fruit extracts, linseed extract, flaxseed extract, hemp seed extract, grape seed extract, grapefruit seed extract, watermelon fruit extract, apple fruit extract, lentil fruit extract, hibiscus flower extract, pear fruit extract, root extract, leaf extract, Schinus terebinthifolius Seed Extract, Ascophyllum nodosum extract, soybean extract, Crothmum martimum extract, Lavandula stoechas extract, stem extracts, Sapindus Mukurossi fruit extract, sandalwood extract, bark extract, barley extract, Polygonum fagopyrum seed extract, avocado extract, cranberry fruit extract, blueberry fruit extract, Silena uniforla extract, Rosa multiflora extract, Evodia rutaecarpa fruit extract, algae extract, licorice leaf extract, jobi seed extract, seed oils, rosemary extract, green tea extract, plankton extract, Himanthalia elongata extract, Unidaria pinnatifida extract, Chlorella vulgaris extract, mugwort extract, and the like.


In some exemplary embodiments, the natural extract is selected from one or more of the following compositions: (1) glycerin, Plantago lanceolata leaf extract and xanthan gum (sold under the trade name Senestem™ by Sederma); (2) Benoitine (plankton extract in water); (3) water, glycerin, and hydrolyzed pearl (sold under the trade name Crodarom® by Croda Inc.) (4) Red Bush (rooibos) plant extract, (5) Phyko-Al-PF (water and hydrolyzed algin), and water, glycerin, and linseed (Linum usitatissimum) seed extract (sold under the trade name Lipigenine™ by Ashland Chemical Company).


In some exemplary embodiments, the active ingredient comprises one or more amino acids. Amino acids are organic compounds containing amine and carboxylic acid functional groups. The amino acid can be an alpha, beta, gamma, or delta amino acid and can be in either enantiomer (L or D isomer). The amino acids of the present invention are not particularly limited and can include, but are not limited to, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan, valine, alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamic acid, glutamine, glycine, proline, selenocystenine, serine, and tyrosine.


In some exemplary embodiments, the active ingredient comprises one or more peptides. Peptides are biologically-occurring short chains of amino acid monomers joined together by amide (peptide) bonds, which are formed through condensation reactions.


In other exemplary embodiments, the active ingredient comprises one or more oligopeptides. Oligopeptides are generally defined as peptide chains with 10 or fewer amino acids. In this way, the oligopeptide may be include, but is not limited to, an oligopeptide, such as a dipeptide, a tripeptide, a tetrapeptide, a pentapeptide, a hexapeptide, a heptapeptide, an octapeptide, a nonapeptide, and a decapeptide.


In other exemplary embodiments, the active ingredient comprises one or more polypeptides. A polypeptide is a long, continuous, unbrached peptide chain. Polypeptides are generally defined as peptide chains with more than 10 amino acids. The polypeptides of the present invention are not particularly limited and can be made of any number of peptide bonds.


In other exemplary embodiments, the active ingredient comprises a protein, which includes at least one long polypeptide that is arranged in a biologically functional way. The proteins of the present invention are not particularly limited and can include any number of polypeptides arranged in any biologically active manner. The peptides, oligopeptides, polypeptides, and proteins comprising the subject topical composition can be natural or synthetic peptides or polypeptides.


Exemplary polypeptides include Juvefoxo™; tetrapeptides, such as Uplevity™ Relistase®, and Decorinyl®; pentapeptides, such as palmitoyl pentapeptide-4, palmitoyl pentapeptide-3, and acetyl pentapeptide-1; hexapeptides, such as Adifyline® and acetyl hexapeptides; and mixtures of polypeptides and natural extracts, such as Triple A Complex, Trylagen® PCB. Exemplary acetyl hexapeptides include acetyl hexapeptide-1, acetyl hexapeptide-3, acetyl hexapeptide-7, acetyl hexapeptide-8, acetyl hexapeptide-19, acetyl hexapeptide-20, acetyl hexapeptide-22, acetyl hexapeptide-24, acetyl hexapeptide-30, acetyl hexapeptide-31, acetyl hexapeptide-37, acetyl hexapeptide-38, acetyl hexapeptide-39, acetyl hexapeptide-46, and acetyl hexapeptide-49. In some exemplary embodiments, the polypeptides include two or more acetyl hexapeptides.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition disclosed herein includes an effective amount of active ingredient to increase the concentration of one or more AMPs, including, for example, HBD-1, HBD-2, and HBD-3, as well as LL-37 (cathelicidin) on the surface of the skin. Such concentration increase helps the skin ability to defend against germs and helps improve the skin's innate immunity. Traditionally, it has been found that compositions used to stimulate the production of AMPs also cause skin inflammation and/or skin irritation. However, it has been discovered that a topical composition comprising the subject active ingredient is capable of increasing the concentration of AMPs on the skin without causing irritation/inflammation of the skin.


The effective amount of active ingredient in the topical composition may include up to about 10.0 percent by weight (wt. %) of the active ingredient, based upon the total weight of the composition. In some exemplary embodiments, the effective amount of active ingredient comprises about 0.02 to about 5.0 wt. %, or from about 0.5 to about 2.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the topical composition. In other exemplary embodiments, the effective amount of active ingredient comprises about 0.1 to about 1.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of topical composition.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition is in the form of a cleanser, such as a soap or a lotion-based cleanser and is used for application to the skin. The topical composition may be in the form of a skin cleanser, skin moisturizer, skin protectant, shampoo, a wipe, a lotion, a salve, foam, soap, gel, a cream, etc. A wide variety of vehicles may be used to deliver the topical composition, such a, for example pads, bandages, patches, sticks, aerosol dispersers, pump sprays, trigger sprays, canisters, foam pumps, wipes, and the like. The topical composition may be applied to the skin before, during, or after skin cleaning.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition includes water quantum sufficit (q.s.). In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition comprises at least about 40 weight percent (wt. %) water, in another embodiment, the topical composition comprises at least about 50.0 wt. % water, in another embodiment, the topical composition comprises at least about 60.0 wt. % water, in another embodiment, the topical composition comprises at least about 70.0 wt. % water, in another embodiment, the topical composition comprises at least about 80.0 wt. % water, and in yet another embodiment, the topical composition comprises at least about 83.0 wt. % water, and in still yet another embodiment, the topical composition comprises at least about 85.0 wt. % water. In other embodiments, the topical composition comprises from about 80.0 wt. % to about 90.0 wt. % water. In a preferred embodiment, the topical composition comprises from about 83.0 to about 87.0 wt. % water. More or less water may be required in certain instances, depending particularly on other ingredients and/or the amounts thereof employed.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition includes one or more humectants. Non-limiting examples of humectants include propylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,4-dihydroxyhexane, 1,2,6-hexanetriol, sorbitol, butylene glycol, caprylyl glycol, propanediols, such as methyl propane diol, dipropylene glycol, triethylene glycol, glycerin (glycerol), polyethylene glycols, ethoxydiglycol, polyethylene sorbitol, and combinations thereof. Other humectants include glycolic acid, glycolate salts, lactate salts, urea, Jojoba wax PEG-120 esters (commercially available from FloraTech), hydroxyethyl urea, alpha-hydroxy acids, such as lactic acid, sodium pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, hyaluronic acid, chitin, and the like. In one exemplary embodiment, the humectant is a mixture of caprylyl glycol, sodium L-pyroglutamate (Sodium PCA), and glycerin.


Examples of polyethylene glycol humectants include PEG-4, PEG-6, PEG-7, PEG-8, PEG-9, PEG-10, PEG-12, PEG-14, PEG-16, PEG-18, PEG-20, PEG-32, PEG-33, PEG-40, PEG-45, PEG-55, PEG-60, PEG-75, PEG-80, PEG-90, PEG-100, PEG-135, PEG-150, PEG-180, PEG-200, PEG-220, PEG-240, and PEG-800.


The humectant may be included in the topical composition in an amount up to about 20.0 wt. %, or up to about 15.0 wt. %, or up to about 12.0 wt. %, or up to about 10.0 wt. %, or up to about 8.0 wt. %, or up to about 3.0 wt. %. In some exemplary embodiments, the humectant is included in an amount from about 0.001 wt. %, or from about 0.01 wt. %, or from about 0.05 wt. %, or from about 0.1 wt. %, or from about 0.5 wt. %, or from about 0.7 wt. %, or from about 1.0 wt. %, or from about 1.5 wt. %, or from about 2.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition. In one exemplary embodiment, the humectant is included in an amount from about 0.4 to about 3.0 wt. %, or from about 1.5 to about 2.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition.


In one or more embodiments, the topical composition includes one or more skin-conditioners or emollients. Non-limiting examples of suitable skin conditioners and emollients include aloe, vitamin E, vitamin E acetate (tocopheryl acetate), Vitamin B3 (niacinamide), C6-10 alkane diols, sodium salt of pyroglutamic acid (sodium PCA), PEG-7 glyceryl cocoate, coco-glucoside and/or glyceryl oleate (Lamisoft® PO), and polyquaternium, such as polyquaternium 10 and 39.


The skin-conditioner or emollient can be included in the topical composition in an amount from about 0.001 to about 5.0 wt. %, in other embodiments, from about 0.005 to about 3.5 wt. %, or from about 0.01 to about 3.0 wt. %, or from about 0.05 to about 2.5 wt. %, or from about 0.1 to about 2.0 wt. %, or from about 0.5 to about 1.5 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition further includes a carrier component, such as a base cleaner.


The topical composition may further comprise one or more deposition enhancers. A suitable deposition enhancer works unidirectionally and will allow ingredients within the composition to penetrate deeper into the stratum corneum whilst preventing the loss of materials from the skin. Advantageously, the deposition enhancer provides a cosmetically acceptable skin feel to the formulation.


In one or more embodiments, the deposition enhancers include one or more of surfactants, bile salts and derivatives thereof, chelating agents, and sulphoxides.


Some examples of acceptable deposition enhancers include hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, dimethyl sulphoxides (DMSO), DMA, DMF, 1-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one (azone), pyrrolidones such as 2-Pyrrolidone (2P) and N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone (NMP), long-chain fatty acids such as oleic acid and fatty acids with a saturated alkyl chain length of about C10-C12, essential oils, terpenes, terpenoids, oxazolidinones such as 4-decyloxazolidin-2-one, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), sodium laureate, polysorbates, sodium glyacolate, sodium deoxycholate, caprylic acid, EDTA, phospholipids, C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, pentylene glycol, ethoxydiglycol, polysorbate-polyethylenesorbitan-monolaurate, and lecithin.


In one or more exemplary embodiments, the deposition enhancer is a quaternary ammonium compound such as polyquaternium-6, -7, -10, -22, -37, -39, -74 or -101.


The deposition enhancer may be included in the topical composition in an amount from about 0.005 wt. % to about 10.0 wt. %, in other embodiments, from about 0.01 wt. % to about 5.0 wt. %, and in other embodiments, from about 0.05 wt. % to about 3.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition.


In one or more exemplary embodiments, the deposition enhancer comprises a hydroxy-terminated polyurethane compound chosen from polyolprepolymer-2, polyolprepolymer-14, and polyolprepolymer-15. Polyolprepolymer-2 is sometimes referred to as PPG-12/SMDI copolymer. The polyurethane compound may be present in the topical composition in an amount from about 0.005 wt. % to about 5.0 wt. %, in other embodiments, from about 0.01 wt. % to about 3.0 wt. %, and in other embodiments, from about 0.05 wt. % to about 1.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition.


The topical composition may further comprise one or more preservatives. A preservative is a natural or synthetic ingredient that can be added to personal care products to prevent spoilage, such as from microbial growth or undesirable chemical changes. Typical cosmetic preservatives are classified as natural antimicrobials, broad-spectrum preservatives, or stabilizers.


Many different types of preservatives are envisioned as being applicable in the current topical composition. Non-limiting examples of preservatives include one or more of isothiazolinones, such as methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone; parabens including butylparaben, propylparaben, methylparaben and germaben II; phenoxyetyhanol and ethylhexylglycerin, organic acids such as potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate and levulinic acid; and phenoxyethanols.


The preservative can be added in the topical composition in an amount up to about 10.0 wt. %, preferably from about 0.05 wt. % to about 5.0 wt. %, more preferably from about 0.1 wt. % to about 2.0 wt. %, based on the weight of the total composition. In one exemplary embodiment, the preservative is present in an amount from about 1.0 to about 1.5 wt. %, based on the weight of the total composition.


The topical composition may further comprise one or more anti-irritants. Anti-irritants reduce signs of inflammation on the skin such as swelling, tenderness, pain, itching, or redness. There are three main types of anti-irritants, all of which are envisioned as being applicable in the subject invention: (1) compounds that operate by complexing the irritant itself, (2) compounds that react with the skin to block reactive sites preventing the irritant from reacting directly with the skin, and (3) compounds that prevent physical contact between the skin and irritant.


Some exemplary examples of suitable anti-irritants include Aloe Vera, allantoin, anion-cation complexes, aryloxypropionates, azulene, carboxymethyl cellulose, cetyl alcohol, diethyl phthalate, Emcol E607, ethanolamine, glycogen, lanolin, N-(2-Hydroxylthyl) Palmitamide, N-Lauroyl Sarcosinates, Maypon 4C, mineral oils, miranols, Myristyl lactate, polypropylene glycol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), tertiary amine oxides, thiodioglycolic acid, and zirconia. In one exemplary embodiment, the anti-irritant is avenanthrmides (Avena sativa (oat), kernel oil, and glycerin) and niacinamide.


The anti-irritant may be included in the topical composition in an amount up to about 10.0 wt. %, in other embodiments, from about 0.005 wt. % to about 3.0 wt. %, and in other embodiments, from about 0.01 wt. % to about 1.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition.


The topical composition may further comprise a fragrance. Any scent may be used in the topical composition including, but not limited to, any scent classification on a standard fragrance chart, such as floral, oriental, woody, and fresh. Exemplary scents include cinnamon, clove, lavender, peppermint, rosemary, thyme, thieves, lemon, citrus, coconut, apricot, plum, watermelon, ginger and combinations thereof.


The fragrance can be included in the topical composition in an amount from about 0.005 wt. % to about 5.0 wt. %, in other embodiments, from about 0.01 wt. % to about 3.0 wt. %, and in other embodiments, from about 0.05 wt. % to about 1.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition. The fragrance can be any made of any perfume, essential oil, aroma compounds, fixatives, terpenes, solvents, and the like. In some exemplary embodiments, the essential oils may include, for example, one or more of Limonene, Citrus Aurantium Dulcis (Orange) Peel Oil, Eucalyptus Globulus Leaf Oil, Citrus Grandis (Grapefruit) Peel Oil, Linalool, Litsea Cubeba Fruit Oil, Lavandula Hybrida Oil, Abies Sibirica Oil, Mentha Citrata Leaf Extract, Coriandrum Sativum (Coriander) Fruit Oil, Piper Nigrum (Pepper) Fruit Oil, and Canarium Luzonicum Gum Nonvolatiles.


The topical composition may further comprise a wide range of optional ingredients that do not deleteriously affect the composition's ability to stimulate AMP concentration on the surface or the composition's ability to regulate the balance of bacteria on the skin. The CTFA International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook, Eleventh Edition 2005, and the 2004 CTFA International Buyer's Guide, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, describe a wide variety of non-limiting cosmetic and pharmaceutical ingredients commonly used in the skin care industry, that are suitable for use in the compositions of the present invention. Examples of these functional classes include: abrasives, anti-acne agents, anticaking agents, antioxidants, binders, biological additives, bulking agents, chelating agents, chemical additives; colorants, cosmetic astringents, cosmetic biocides, denaturants, drug astringents, emulsifiers, external analgesics, film formers, fragrance components, opacifying agents, plasticizers, preservatives (sometimes referred to as antimicrobials), propellants, reducing agents, skin bleaching agents, skin-conditioning agents (emollient, miscellaneous, and occlusive), skin protectants, solvents, surfactants, foam boosters, hydrotropes, solubilizing agents, suspending agents (nonsurfactant), sunscreen agents, ultraviolet light absorbers, detackifiers, and viscosity increasing agents (aqueous and nonaqueous). Examples of other functional classes of materials useful herein that are well known to one of ordinary skill in the art include solubilizing agents, sequestrants, keratolytics, topical active ingredients, and the like.


The topical compositions exhibit a pH in the range of from about 3 to about 12.0, or a pH in the range of from about 4 to about 8, or in the range of from about 4.5 and about 7. When necessary, a pH adjusting agent or constituent may be used to provide and/or maintain the pH of a composition. Exemplary pH adjusting agents include, but are not limited to, organic acids, such as citric acid, lactic acid, formic acid, acetic acid, proponic acid, butyric acid, caproic acid, oxalic acid, maleic acid, benzoic acid, carbonic acid, and the like.


The form of the composition of the present invention is not particularly limited. In one or more embodiments, topical compositions of the present invention may be formulated as a cleansing lotion, a foamable composition, a rinse-off soap cleansing composition, a thickened gel composition, or may be applied to a wipe.


In one or more embodiments, the topical composition is formulated as a foamable composition. One or more foam agents may optionally be included in the foamable composition.


Any foaming agent conventionally known and used may be employed in the topical composition. In one or more embodiments, the foam agent comprises a non-ionic foam agent such as decyl glucoside or an amphoteric foam agent such as cocamidopropylbetaine. In one or more embodiments, the amount of nonionic or amphoteric foam agent is from about 0.5 to about 3.5 wt. %, in other embodiments from about 1.0 to about 3.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the topical composition. In one or more embodiments, the amount of decyl glucoside or cocamidopropylbetaine is from about 0.5 to about 3.5 wt. %, in other embodiments from about 1.0 to about 3.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the topical composition.


In some exemplary embodiments, the foaming agents include one or more of silicone glycol and fluorosurfactants. Silicone glycols may be generally characterized by containing one or more Si—O—Si linkages in the polymer backbone. Silicone glycols include organopolysiloxane dimethicone polyols, silicone carbinol fluids, silicone polyethers, alkylmethyl siloxanes, amodimethicones, trisiloxane ethoxylates, dimethiconols, quaternized silicone glycols, polysilicones, silicone crosspolymers, and silicone waxes.


Examples of silicone glycols include dimethicone PEG-7 undecylenate, PEG-10 dimethicone, PEG-8 dimethicone, PEG-12 dimethicone, perfluorononylethyl carboxydecal PEG 10, PEG-20/PPG-23 dimethicone, PEG-11 methyl ether dimethicone, bis-PEG/PPG-20/20 dimethicone, silicone quats, PEG-9 dimethicone, PPG-12 dimethicone, fluoro PEG-8 dimethicone, PEG-23/PPG-6 dimethicone, PEG-20/PPG-23 dimethicone, PEG 17 dimethicone, PEG-5/PPG-3 methicone, bis-PEG-18 methyl ether dimethyl silane, bis-PEG-20 dimethicone, PEG/PPG-20/15 dimethicone copolyol and sulfosuccinate blends, PEG-8 dimethicone\dimmer acid blends, PEG-8 dimethicone\fatty acid blends, PEG-8 dimethicone\cold pressed vegetable oil\polyquaternium blends, random block polymers and mixtures thereof.


The amount of silicone glycol foam agent is not particularly limited, so long as an effective amount to produce foaming is present. In certain embodiments, the effective amount to produce foaming may vary, depending upon the amount of other ingredients that are present. In one or more embodiments, the composition includes at least about 0.002 wt. % of silicone glycol foam agent, based upon the total weight of the composition. In another embodiment, the composition includes at least about 0.01 wt. % of silicone glycol foam agent, based upon the total weight of the composition. In yet another embodiment, the composition includes at least about 0.05 wt. % of silicone glycol foam agent, based upon the total weight of the composition.


In some exemplary embodiments, the foam agent is present in an amount of from about 0.002 to about 4.0 wt. %, or in an amount of from about 0.01 to about 2.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition. It is envisioned that higher amounts may also be effective to produce foam. All such weights as they pertain to listed ingredients are based on the active level, and therefore, do not include carriers or by-products that may be included in commercially available materials, unless otherwise specified.


In other embodiments, it may be desirable to use higher amounts of foam agent. For example, in certain embodiments where the foaming composition of the present invention includes a cleansing product that is applied to a surface and then rinsed off, higher amounts of foam agent may be employed. In these embodiments, the amount of foam agent is present in amounts up to about 35.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition.


The topical composition of the present invention may be formulated as an aerosol or non-aerosol foamable composition. In some exemplary embodiments the topical composition is dispensed from an unpressurized or low-pressure dispenser which mixes the composition with air.


In one or more embodiments, the viscosity of the non-aerosol foamable composition is less than about 100 mPas, in one embodiment less than about 50 mPas, and in another embodiment less than about 25 mPas.


In one or more embodiments, the compositions of the present invention may be formulated as a lotion. As is known in the art, lotions include oil-in-water emulsions as well as water-in-oil emulsions, oil-water-oil, and water-oil-water. A wide variety of ingredients may be present in either the oil or water phase of the emulsion. That is, the lotion formulation is not particularly limited.


Compositions of the present invention may be characterized by reference to viscosity and/or rheological properties. In one or more embodiments, the viscosity may be expressed as a standard, single-point type viscosity, as measured on a Brookfield Digital viscometer at a temperature of about 20° C., using spindle T-D, heliopath, at a speed of 10 rpm. In one or more embodiments, the compositions may have a viscosity of from about 2000 to about 120,000 cPs.


In one or more embodiments, compositions of the present invention may be characterized as lotions, having a viscosity of less than about 120,000 centipoise (cPs), in other embodiments, less than about 100,000, and in other embodiments, less than about 75,000 cPs. In one or more embodiments, the lotion compositions may have a viscosity of from about 3000 to about 50,000 cPs, in other embodiments, from about 4000 to about 30,000 cPs.


Exemplary lotion formulations include those containing water and/or alcohols and emollients such as hydrocarbon oils and waxes, silicone oils, hyaluronic acid, vegetable, animal or marine fats or oils, glyceride derivatives, fatty acids or fatty acid esters or alcohols or alcohol ethers, lanolin and derivatives, polyhydric alcohols or esters, wax esters, sterols, phospholipids and the like, and generally also emulsifiers (nonionic, cationic or anionic), although some of the emollients inherently possess emulsifying properties.


In one or more embodiments, compositions of the present invention may be characterized as serum, having a viscosity of from about 2000 to about 3000 cPs.


In one or more embodiments, compositions of the present invention may be characterized as creams, having a viscosity of from about 30,000 to about 100,000 cPs, in other embodiments from about 50,000 to about 80,000 cPs.


In one or more embodiments, compositions according to the present invention are pourable at room temperature, i.e. a temperature in the range of from about 20 to about 25° C. In one or more embodiments, the lotion formulations are viscous enough to hold a shape or not flow for a desired period of time. In other embodiments, compositions of the present invention are creams or ointments, and are not pourable and do not flow at room temperature and will not conform to a container when placed into the container at room temperature.


In one or more embodiments, the topical composition of the present invention may include thickeners and optionally one or more stabilizers. Examples of thickeners and stabilizers include polyurethane-based thickeners, such as steareth-100/PEG-136/HDI copolymer (Rheoluxe® 811); sodium chloride; propylene glycol; PEG-120 methyl glucose dioleate and methyl gluceth-10 (Ritathix DOE, available from Rita Corp.); hydroxyethyl cellulose; quaternized hydroxyethyl cellulose (Polyquaternium-10); hydroxypropyl cellulose; methyl cellulose; carboxymethyl cellulose; and ammonium acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP copolymer.


In one or more exemplary embodiments, the topical composition may be thickened with polyacrylate thickeners such as those conventionally available and/or known in the art. Examples of polyacrylate thickeners include carbomers, acrylates/C10-30 alkyl acrylate crosspolymers, copolymers of acrylic acid and alkyl (C5-C10) acrylate, copolymers of acrylic acid and maleic anhydride, and mixtures thereof. In one or more embodiments, the gel composition includes an effective amount of a polymeric thickener to adjust the viscosity of the gel to a viscosity range of from about 1000 to about 65,000 centipoise. In one embodiment, the viscosity of the gel is from about 5000 to about 35,000, and in another embodiment, the viscosity is from about 10,000 to about 25,000. The viscosity is measured by a Brookfield RV Viscometer using RV and/or LV Spindles at 22° C.+/−3° C.


As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the effective amount of thickener will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the amount of other ingredients in the topical composition. In one or more embodiments, an effective amount of thickener is at least about 0.01 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition. In other embodiments, the effective amount is at least about 0.02 wt. %, or at least about 0.05 wt. %, or at least about 0.1 wt. %. In some exemplary embodiment, the effective amount of thickener is at least about 0.5 wt. %, or at least about 0.75 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition. In one or more embodiments, the compositions according to the present invention comprise up to about 10% by weight of the total composition of a polymeric thickener. In certain embodiments, the amount of thickener is from about 0.01 to about 1.0 wt. %, or from about 0.02 to about 0.4 wt. %, or from about 0.05 to about 0.3 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition. The amount of thickener may be from about 0.1 to about 10.0 wt. %, or from about 0.5 to about 5.0 wt. %, or from about 0.75 to about 2.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition.


In one or more embodiments, the topical composition may further comprise a neutralizing agent. Examples of neutralizing agents include amines, alkanolamines, alkanolamides, inorganic bases, amino acids, including salts, esters and acyl derivatives thereof. Exemplary neutralizing agents include triethanolamine, sodium hydroxide, monoethanolamine and dimethyl stearylamine. Other neutralizing agents are also known, such as HO(CmH2m)2NH, where m has the value of from 2 to 3, and aminomethyl propanol, aminomethyl propanediol, and ethoxylated amines, such as PEG-25 cocamine, polyoxyethylene (5) cocamine (PEG-5 cocamine), polyoxyethylene (25) cocamine (PEG-25 cocamine), polyoxyethylene (5) octadecylamine (PEG-S stearamine), polyoxyethylene (25) octadecylamine (PEG-25 stearamine), polyoxyethylene (5) tallowamine (PEG-5 tallowamine), polyoxyethylene (15) oleylamine (PEG-15 oleylamine), polyethylene (5) soyamine (PEG-5 soyamine), and polyoxyethylene (25) soyamine (PEG-15 soyamine). A number of these are commercially available under the trade name of Ethomeen® from Akzo Chemie America, Armak Chemicals of Chicago, Ill.


In some exemplary embodiments the neutralizing agent includes at least one of sodium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide precursors. Solutions of sodium hydroxide in water are non-limiting examples of neutralizers containing sodium hydroxide.


The neutralizing agent is employed in an effective amount to neutralize a portion of the carboxyl groups of the thickening agent, and produce the desired pH range. The pH of un-neutralized thickening agent dispersed in water is generally acidic. For example, the pH of Carbopol® polymer dispersions is approximately in the range of 2.5 to 3.5, depending upon the polymer concentration. An effective amount of neutralizing agent, when added to the thickener dispersion, adjusts the pH to a desired range of about 4.1 to 4.8, or of about 4.2 to 4.6. The amount of neutralizing agent necessary to effect this pH range will vary depending upon factors such as the type of thickening agent, the amount of thickening agent, etc. However, in general, amounts less than 1.0 wt. % or ranging from about 0.001 to about 0.3 wt. % by weight of the neutralizing agent are considered sufficient and effective.


In some exemplary embodiments the topical composition can also be formulated as a cleansing composition or soap. A fatty acid or a fatty acid ester may be used in conjunction with an alkali or base from the water phase to form a soap which has good water solubility as well as oil solubility properties and hence, is an excellent emulsifier. The soap, as explained above, can be in the form of a lotion soap, a foam soap, or any other common form known to one of skill in the art. Typical commercial blends such as oleic fatty acid, coconut fatty acid, soya fatty acid and tall oil fatty acid can be used. Preferably, the fatty acid comprises from about 5.0 to about 10.0 wt. % of the total topical composition.


As explained above, a base may be utilized in conjunction with the fatty acid to produce a soap on an equivalent basis of from about 2.7 to 0.8 equivalents to 1 equivalent of base. Examples of suitable base include organic alkalis or amines such as monoethanolamine, triethanolamine, and mixed isopropanolamines such as diisopropanolamine. Examples of suitable base also include inorganic alkalis, such as potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, soda ash, and ammonia.


In addition, one or more surfactants can be included in the oil phase of the cleaning composition in amounts preferably ranging up to about 25.0 wt. %. A surfactant is generally any substance which reduces the surface tension of a liquid. They break down the interface between water and oils/dirt. By holding the oils/dirt in suspension, they can be easily removed from the surface (i.e. skin).


In some exemplary embodiments, the surfactant includes a mixture of primary and secondary surfactants. Nonionic surfactants, i.e., surfactants which are uncharged (neutral) and without cationic or anionic sites, are preferred since they tend to render the composition stable, i.e., impart two desirable properties thereto. The first property is that of a suitable long shelf life. In other words, the emulsion can be held together at room temperature for long periods of time. The second desirable property is that upon use of the cleaning composition, the surfactant permits breakage of the emulsion or opening up thereof such that the hydrocarbon oil is readily released. The surfactant can also be an anionic surfactant, which carry a negative charge and are ionized in solution. The surfactant can also be a cationic surfactant, which carry a positive charge and ionize in solution. The surfactant can also be an amphoteric surfactant, which have the ability to be anionic (negatively charged), cationic (positively charged), or nonionic (uncharged, neutral) in solution depending on the pH.


It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that in one or more embodiments, surfactant and/or surfactant combinations may be chosen to limit irritation of the composition and/or to enhance the effect of the active ingredient. In yet another embodiment, surfactant and/or surfactant combinations may be chosen to allow maximum bioavailability of the active ingredient. Non-limiting exemplary examples of surfactant combinations, levels of which will be known to one skilled in the art, are sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) and/or cocamidopropyl betaine and/or disodium cocoamphodiacetate and/or surfactants of similar structure.


Non-limiting exemplary examples of surfactants that are envisioned in the present composition include betaines such as cocamidoproyl betaine; sulfonates and sulfates such as sodium laureth sulfate, sodium cocosulfate, sodium trideceth sulfate, and alkylbenzene sulfonate; glucosides, such as lauryl gluocoside and decyl glucoside; sodium cocoyl isothionate, sodium cocoyl glycinate, cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, PEG-80 sorbitan laurate, di-alkyl sulfosuccinate, lignosulfonates, disodium cocoamphodiacetate, lauryl glucoside, and PEG-80 sodium laurate.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical cleansing composition comprises at least one primary surfactant and at least one secondary surfactant. A primary surfactant may include, for example, sodium laureth sulfate. Exemplary secondary surfactants may include, for example, one or more of cocamidopropyl betaine, disodium cocoamphodiacetate, cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine, and lauryl glucoside.


As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the amount of surfactant will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the amount of other ingredients in the topical composition. In some exemplary embodiments, the surfactant is included in at least about 0.5 wt. %, or at least about 0.75 wt. %, or at least about 1.0 wt. %, or at least about 2.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition. In one or more exemplary embodiments, the compositions according to the present invention comprise up to about 25 wt. %, or up to about 18 wt. %, or up to about 15 wt. %, or up to about 12 wt. %, or up to about 9.0 wt. % of the total composition of one or more surfactant. In certain exemplary embodiments, the amount of surfactant is from about 2.0 wt. % to about 20 wt. %, or from about 2.5 wt. % to about 18. wt. %, or from about 3.0 wt. % to about 13.0 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the composition.


The composition of the present invention may be employed in any type of dispenser typically used for gel products, for example pump dispensers. A wide variety of pump dispensers are suitable. Pump dispensers may be affixed to bottles or other free-standing containers. Pump dispensers may be incorporated into wall-mounted dispensers. Pump dispensers may be activated manually by hand or foot pump, or may be automatically activated. Useful dispensers include those available from GOJO Industries under the designations NXT® and TFX™ as well as traditional bag-in-box dispensers. Examples of dispensers are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,265,772, 5,944,227, 6,877,642, 7,028,861, 7,611,030, and 7,621,426, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. In one or more embodiments, the dispenser includes an outlet such as a nozzle, through which the composition is dispensed. In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition is used in dispensers that employ foaming pumps, which combine ambient air or an inert gas and the composition in a mixing chamber and pass the mixture through a mesh screen.


In one or more embodiments, the topical composition is integrated into wipe composition. Wipe compositions in accordance with this invention include at least one alcohol, a C1-10 alkanediol enhancer, and are applied to a wipe substrate. In some exemplary embodiments, the wipe composition is alcohol-free.


Wipe substrates used in antimicrobial wipes are further described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,686,088, 6,410,499, 6,436,892, 6,495,508, 6,844,308. In one or more embodiments, the wipe may comprise a laminate formed by spunbonding/meltblowing/spunbonding (SMS). Generally, an SMS material contains a meltblown web sandwiched between two exteriors spunbond webs. SMS materials are further described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,041,203, 5,169,706, 5,464,688, and 4,766,029, and are commercially available, for example from Kimberly-Clark Corporation under marks such as Spunguard 7 and Evolution 7. The SMS laminate may be treated or untreated.


In some exemplary embodiments, the topical composition increases the presence of AMPs on the skin, including at least human beta defensin (HBD) 1, HBD-2, and HBD-3 as well as LL-37.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-1 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-1 by at least 25%, or at least 100%, or at least 500%, or at least 800%, or at least 1000%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-1 by at least 1,400%, or by at least 1,700%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-2 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-2 by at least 25%, or at least 100%, or at least 500%, or at least 800%, or at least 1000%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-2 by at least 1,100%, or by at least 1,200%, or by at least 2,000%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-3 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-3 by at least 25%, or at least 50%, or at least 100%, or at least 500%, or at least 800%, or at least 1000%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a polypeptide active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-3 by at least 2,000%, or by at least 2,500%, or by at least 4,000%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a natural extract active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-1 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. Particularly, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % linseed extract increases the concentration of HBD-1 by at least 10%, or at least 20%, or at least 50%, or at least 75%, or at least 95%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a natural extract active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-2 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. Particularly, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % linseed extract increases the concentration of HBD-2 by at least 5%, or at least 10%, or at least 20%, or at least 23%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a natural extract active ingredient increases the concentration of HBD-3 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. Particularly, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % linseed extract increases the concentration of HBD-3 by at least 5%, or at least 10%, or at least 20%, or at least 29%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a natural extract active ingredient increases the concentration of LL-37 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. Particularly, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % linseed extract increases the concentration of LL-37 by at least 5%, or at least 10%, or at least 20%, or at least 30%, or at least 38%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a natural extract active ingredient decreases the concentration of IL-8 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. Particularly, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % linseed extract decreases the concentration of IL-8 by at least 5%, or at least 10%, or at least 20%, or at least 30%, or at least 33%, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a natural extract active ingredient in a rinse-off formulation increases the concentration of HBD-1 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. Particularly, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % linseed extract in a rinse-off formulation increases the concentration of HBD-1 by at least 1 ng/mL, or at least 4 ng/mL, or at least 6 ng/mL, or at least 10 ng/mL, or at least 16 ng/mL, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a natural extract active ingredient in a rinse-off formulation increases the concentration of HBD-2 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. Particularly, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % linseed extract in a rinse off formulation increases the concentration of HBD-2 by at least 1 ng/mL, or at least 10 ng/mL, or at least 25 ng/mL, or at least 40 ng/mL, or at least 60 ng/mL, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


In some exemplary embodiments, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % of a natural extract active ingredient in a rinse-off formulation increases the concentration of HBD-3 by a statistically significant amount, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient. Particularly, a topical composition comprising up to about 10.0 wt. % linseed extract in a rinse-off formulation increases the concentration of HBD-3 by at least 1 ng/mL, or at least 50 ng/mL, or at least 100 ng/mL, or at least 150 ng/mL, or at least 185 ng/mL, as compared to an otherwise identical composition that does not include the active ingredient.


EXAMPLES

The following examples are included for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the methods described herein.


Example 1

To determine the optimal dose of active ingredient, test dose response studies were run using both Decorinyl® and Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3. These test dose response studies were commissioned to determine the concentration of HBD-1 at various levels of the active ingredients. Neonatal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes (NHEK; Life Technology, Grand Island, N.Y., USA) were cultured with keratinocyte growth medium (KGM, Medium 154: M-154-500 Life Technology with supplements S-001, Life Technologies). NHEK were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 10000 cells in 200 μl medium per well. After 48 hours, the cells were incubated with varying concentrations of each ingredient solution in a culture medium (KGM) overnight (16 hours) at 37° C., 5% CO2 and 95% humidity at four replicates for each concentration. Each of these active ingredients was tested at the following weight percents based on the weight of the total culture: 0.02 wt. %, 0.05 wt. %, 0.1 wt. %, 0.2 wt. %, 0.5 wt. %, 1.0 wt. %, 2.0 wt. %. Each of these compositions was compared to a control culture medium.


HBD-1 was detected using HBD-1 ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) developing kits (commercially available from Peprotech). ELISA were performed according to the manufactory instructions of each kit by adding 100 μl/well of culture medium after overnight treatment. The substrate of ELISA reaction was using the substrate reagent from R&D Systems (DY999), and the reactions were stopped by adding 50 μl of 1N H2SO4 in each well. The results were measured using a colorimeter, absorbance was measured at 450 nanometers (nm) within 30 minutes. Wavelength correction was set to 570 nm. The concentration of each sample was calculated using ELISA standard curve.


The results are listed below in Table 1 and depicted graphically in FIG. 1. As illustrated below, a 1.0 and 2.0 wt. % concentration of Decorinyl® demonstrated an increase in HBD-1 concentration of 1763% and 1465% were observed for 1.0 wt. % and 2.0 wt. % Decorinyl®, respectively. Increases in HBD-1 concentration of 311% and 1561% were observed for 1.0 wt. % and 2.0 wt. % Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3, respectively.













TABLE 1







Active Ingredient
wt. %
HBD-1 (pg/ml)




















Control
Medium
63



Decorinyl ®
  2%
986




  1%
1174




 0.5%
130




 0.2%
107




 0.1%
138




0.05%
84




0.02%
67



Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3
  2%
1047




  1%
259




0.50%
162




0.20%
85




0.10%
64




0.05%
57




0.02%
59










Example 2

To determine the optimal dose of active ingredient, test dose response studies were run using both Decorinyl® and Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3. These test dose response studies were commissioned to determine the concentration of HBD-2 at various levels of the active ingredients. Neonatal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes (NHEK; Life Technology, Grand Island, N.Y., USA) were cultured with keratinocyte growth medium (KGM, Medium 154: M-154-500 Life Technology with supplements S-001, Life Technologies). NHEK were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 10000 cells in 200 μl medium per well. After 48 hours, the cells were incubated with varying concentrations of each ingredient solution in a culture medium (KGM) overnight (16 hours) at 37° C., 5% CO2 and 95% humidity at four replicates for each concentration. Each of these active ingredients was tested at the following weight percents based on the weight of the total culture: 0.02 wt. %, 0.05 wt. %, 0.1 wt. %, 0.2 wt. %, 0.5 wt. %, 1.0 wt. %, 2.0 wt. %. Each of these compositions was compared to a control culture medium.


HBD-2 was detected using HBD-2 ELISA developing kits (commercially available from Peprotech). ELISA were performed according to the manufactory instructions of each kit by adding 100 μl/well of culture medium after overnight treatment. The substrate of ELISA reaction was using the substrate reagent from R&D Systems (DY999), and the reactions were stopped by adding 50 μl of 1N H2SO4 in each well. The results were measured using a colorimeter, absorbance was measured at 450 nanometers (nm) within 30 minutes. Wavelength correction was set to 570 nm. The concentration of each sample was calculated using ELISA standard curve.


The results are listed below in Table 2 and depicted graphically in FIG. 2. Increases in HBD-2 concentration of 11,371% and 12,329% were observed for 1.0 wt. % and 2.0 wt. % Decorinyl® respectively. An increase in HBD-2 concentration of 2800% was observed for 2.0 wt. % Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3.













TABLE 2







Active Ingredient
wt. %
HBD-2 (pg/ml)




















Control
Medium
7



Decorinyl ®
  2%
870




  1%
803




 0.5%
44




 0.2%
15




 0.1%
15




0.05%
12




0.02%
9



Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3
  2%
203




  1%
72




0.50%
21




0.20%
14




0.10%
9




0.05%
8




0.02%
9










Example 3

To determine the optimal dose of active ingredient, test dose response studies were run using both Decorinyl® and Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3. These test dose response studies were commissioned to determine the concentration of HBD-3 at various levels of the active ingredients. Neonatal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes (NHEK; Life Technology, Grand Island, N.Y., USA) were cultured with keratinocyte growth medium (KGM, Medium 154: M-154-500 Life Technology with supplements S-001, Life Technologies). NHEK were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 10000 cells in 200 μl medium per well. After 48 hours, the cells were incubated with varying concentrations of each ingredient solution in a culture medium (KGM) overnight (16 hours) at 37° C., 5% CO2 and 95% humidity at four replicates for each concentration. Each of these active ingredients was tested at the following weight percents based on the weight of the total culture: 0.02 wt. %, 0.05 wt. %, 0.1 wt. %, 0.2 wt. %, 0.5 wt. %, 1.0 wt. %, 2.0 wt. %. Each of these compositions was compared to a control culture medium.


HBD-3 was detected using HBD-3 ELISA developing kits (commercially available from Peprotech). ELISA were performed according to the manufactory instructions of each kit by adding 100 μl/well of culture medium after overnight treatment. The substrate of ELISA reaction was using the substrate reagent from R&D Systems (DY999), and the reactions were stopped by adding 50 μl of 1N H2SO4 in each well. The results were measured using a colorimeter, absorbance was measured at 450 nanometers (nm) within 30 minutes. Wavelength correction was set to 570 nm. The concentration of each sample was calculated using ELISA standard curve.


The results are shown below in Table 3 and depicted graphically in FIG. 3. Increases in HBD-3 concentration of 4438% and 2616% were observed for 1.0 wt. % and 2.0 wt. % Decorinyl® respectively. Increases in HBD-3 concentration of 1005% and 1890% were observed for 1.0 wt. % and 2.0 wt. % Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3, respectively.













TABLE 3







Active Ingredient
wt. %
HBD-3 (pg/ml)




















Control
Medium
433



Decorinyl ®
  2%
11759




  1%
19652




 0.5%
3058




 0.2%
703




 0.1%
682




0.05%
456




0.02%
226



Pamitoyl Pentapeptided-3
  2%
8617




  1%
4783




0.50%
2278




0.20%
775




0.10%
387




0.05%
242




0.02%
288










Example 4

Lipigenine™ was tested for its ability to stimulate an increase in HBD-1 concentration. The HBD-1 standard AB TS (2,2′-Azinobis [3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid]-diammonium salt) ELISA development kits were obtained from PeproTech (Cat #900-K202). ELISA were performed according to the manufactory instructions of each kit by adding 100 μl/well of culture medium after overnight treatment. The substrate of ELISA reaction was using the substrate reagent from R&D Systems (DY999), and the reactions were stopped by adding 50 μl of 1N H2SO4 in each well. The Lipigenine™ culture was compared to the control medium which contained no other ingredients. The results were measured using a colorimeter, absorbance was measured at 450 nanometers (nm) within 30 minutes. Wavelength correction was set to 570 nm. The concentration of each sample was calculated using ELISA standard curve.


The addition of Lipigenine™ showed high HBD-1 concentration at both 0.1% and 1% Lipigenine™ in solution as compared to the control. An increase in HBD-1 concentration of 20% was observed for 0.1% Lipigenine™ while an increase in HBD-1 concentration of 95% was observed for 1% Lipigenine™. These results are shown in FIG. 4.


Example 5

Lipigenine™ was tested for its ability to stimulate an increase in HBD-2 concentration. The HBD-2 standard ABTS ELISA development kits were obtained from PeproTech (Cat #900-K172). ELISA was performed according to the manufactory instructions of each kit by adding 100 μl/well of culture medium after overnight treatment. The substrate of ELISA reaction was using the substrate reagent from R&D Systems (DY999), and the reactions were stopped by adding 50 μl of 1N H2SO4 in each well. The Lipigenine™ culture was compared to the control medium which contained no other ingredients. The results were measured using a colorimeter, absorbance was measured at 450 nanometers (nm) within 30 minutes. Wavelength correction was set to 570 nm. The concentration of each sample was calculated using ELISA standard curve.


The addition of Lipigenine™ showed increased HBD-2 concentrations at both 0.1% and 1% Lipigenine™ in solution as compared to the control. An increase in HBD-2 concentration of 7% was observed for a 0.1% Lipigenine™ formulation while an increase in HBD-2 expression of 23% was observed for a 1% Lipigenine™ formulation. These results are shown in FIG. 5.


Example 6

Lipigenine™ was tested for its ability to stimulate an increase in HBD-3 concentration. The HBD-3 standard ABTS ELISA development kit was obtained from PeproTech (Cat #900-K210). ELISA were performed according to the manufactory instructions of each kit by adding 100 μl/well of culture medium after overnight treatment. The substrate of ELISA reaction was using the substrate reagent from R&D Systems (DY999), and the reactions were stopped by adding 50 μl of 1N H2SO4 in each well. The Lipigenine™ culture was compared to the control medium which contained no other ingredients. The results were measured using a colorimeter, absorbance was measured at 450 nanometers (nm) within 30 minutes. Wavelength correction was set to 570 nm. The concentration of each sample was calculated using ELISA standard curve.


The addition of Lipigenine™ showed increased HBD-3 concentration at both 0.1% and 1% Lipigenine™ in solution as compared to the control. An increase in HBD-3 concentration of 29% was observed for a 0.1% Lipigenine™ formulation while an increase in HBD-3 concentration of 18% was observed for a 1% Lipigenine™ formulation. These results are shown in FIG. 6.


Example 7

A topical composition with Lipigenine™ was tested for its ability to increase concentration of Cathelicidin (LL37), an amphipathic alpha-helical peptide that plays an important role in defense against local infection and invasion of pathogens at sites of inflammation and wounds. The human LL-37 ELISA kit was obtained from Hycult Biotech (Cat #HK321). ELISA were performed according to the manufactory instructions of each kit by adding 100 μl/well of culture medium after overnight treatment. The results were measured using a colorimeter, absorbance was measured at 450 nanometers (nm) within 30 minutes. Wavelength correction was set to 570 nm.


The addition of Lipigenine™ showed increased LL-37 concentration at both 0.1% and 1% Lipigenine™ in solution as compared to the control. An increase in LL-37 concentration of 32% for a 0.1% Lipigenine™ formulation while an increase in LL-37 concentration of 38% was observed for a 1% Lipigenine™ formulation. These results are shown in FIG. 7.


Example 8

A topical composition with Lipigenine™ was tested for its ability to decrease concentration of Interleukin 8 (IL-8 or CXCL8) which is a chemokine and proinflammatory cytokine produced by macrophages and other cell types such as epithelial cells. It is secreted from keratinocytes in skin in response to inflammatory stimuli. IL-8 is secreted and is an important mediator of the immune reaction in the innate immune system response. IL-8 over-expressed is a biomarker of skin irritation. IL-8 is associated with inflammation and plays a role in colorectal cancer.


For Control A, human dermal keratinocytes were left untreated. No irritation is expected, and therefore Control A provides a baseline (set as 0). For Control B, IL-8 is induced in human dermal keratinocytes by applying a surfactant mixture that is a combination of sodium laureth sulfate and polyquaternium-10 (set as 100%). For all other samples, the human dermal keratinocytes are co-treated with the surfactant mixture and a composition containing indicated concentration of Lipigenine™. Decreased IL-8 expression reflects an ingredient's anti-irritation activity. In order to carry out the test method, an assay kit was employed that was obtained from R&D Systems: Human CXCL8/IL-8 Duoset ELISA Kit (DY208). ELISA was performed after overnight treatment using by applying 100 μl/well of culture medium according to the manufactory instruction of the ELISA kit. The results were measured using a colorimeter, absorbance was measured at 450 nanometers (nm) within 30 minutes. Wavelength correction was set to 570 nm.


The addition of Lipigenine™ showed reduced IL-8 concentration at both 0.1% and 1% Lipigenine™ in solution as compared to a surfactant. A decrease in IL-8 concentration of 30% was observed for a 0.1% Lipigenine™ formulation while a decrease in IL-8 concentration of 33% was observed for a 1% Lipigenine™ formulation. These results are shown in FIG. 8.


Example 9

Tape stripping tests were also performed with 5% Lipigenine™ in a soap base formulation (rinse-off) to determine the concentration of AMPs including HBD-1, HBD-2, and HBD-3 on the skin as compared to a soap base without Lipigenine™ (rinse-off). A higher concentration of Lipigenine™ was needed in this example because the formulation was being washed off of the skin instead of being left on. Seven (7) layers of tape strips were applied to the skin at two adjacent sites for both the soap base with Lipigenine™ and the soap base without Lipigenine™. The strips were applied after the two soap bases had been used to clean each skin site. After application, the first layer of tape was discarded as there was too much noise to properly analyze the strip. Thereafter, layers 2-4 were combined (the “Upper Layers”) and layers 5-7 were combined (the “Lower Layers”). These tape striping experiments were run at 0 days (before application), 5 days after application, and 10 days after application to observe increases in AMP concentration over time. Each of the Upper Layers and the Lower Layers were placed in a glass vial and frozen until analysis. Increases in HBD-1 concentration of about 13 pg/mL and about 16 pg/mL were observed for the Upper Layers after 5 days and the Lower Layers after 5 days, respectfully for the soap base with Lipigenine™ as compared to a soap base without Lipigenine™ A statistically significant (95% confidence) increase in HBD-2 concentration of about 63 ng/mL was observed after 5 days in the Lower Layers for the soap base with Lipigenine™ as compared to a soap base without Lipigenine™. A statistically significant (90% confidence) increase in HBD-3 concentration of over 189 pg/mL in HBD-3 was observed after 5 days in the Lower Layers for the soap base with Lipigenine™ as compared to a soap base without Lipigenine™. These results are shown below in Table 4.












TABLE 4






5% Lipigenine ™
(Soap Control)
(Standard



in ALSO Soap Base
ALSO Soap Base
Control)



used as a rinse-
used as a rinse-
Untreated Skin


Layer/Day
ff (Code-W)
off (Code-R)
Control (Code-U)















HBD-1 Concentration (pg/mL)


2-4 Upper Layers











0
days
0
0
0


5
days
−7.915
−5.004
0.000


10
days
−2.209
1.696
0.000







5-7 Lower Layers











0
days
0
0
0


5
days
9.904
−6.579
0.000


10
days
5.223
−1.794
0.000







HBD-2 Concentration (pg/mL)


2-4 Upper Layers











0
days
0
0
0


5
days
−26.890
−17.583
0.000


10
days
−7.192
10.595
0.000







5-7 Lower Layers











0
days
0
0
0


5
days
35.334 R
−27.588
0.000


10
days
27.552
−7.822
0.000







HBD-3 Concentration (pg/mL)


2-4 Upper Layers











0
days
0
0
0


5
days
22.321
−51.342
0.000


10
days
59.166
1.666
0.000







5-7 Lower Layers











0
days
0
0
0


5
days
168.683 r
−21.325
0.000


10
days
141.267
22.110
0.000









Although embodiments of the invention have been described herein, it should be appreciated that many modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the general inventive concepts. All such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention, which is to be limited only by the following claims

Claims
  • 1. A cleansing composition comprising: an active ingredient, the active ingredient comprising a linseed extract, wherein the active ingredient is present in an amount up to 5 wt. %;from 3 wt. % to 13 wt. % of one or more primary surfactants comprising sodium laureth sulfate;one or more foaming agents; andat least 70 wt. % of water,wherein each wt. % is based upon the total weight of the cleansing composition.
  • 2. The cleansing composition of claim 1, wherein the active ingredient is present in an amount up to 1 wt. %, based upon the total weight of the cleansing composition.
  • 3. The cleansing composition of claim 1, wherein the one or more primary surfactants consist of anionic surfactants.
  • 4. The cleansing composition of claim 3, wherein the one or more foaming agents are selected from the group consisting of betaines.
  • 5. The cleansing composition of claim 1, wherein the cleansing composition increases the concentration of antimicrobial peptides on skin, as compared to an otherwise identical cleansing composition without the active ingredient.
  • 6. The cleansing composition of claim 5, wherein the cleansing composition increases the concentration of HBD-1 by at least 10%, relative to an otherwise identical cleansing composition without the active ingredient.
  • 7. The cleansing composition of claim 5, wherein the cleansing composition increases the concentration of HBD-2 by at least 5%, relative to an otherwise identical cleansing composition without the active ingredient.
  • 8. The cleansing composition of claim 5, wherein the cleansing composition increases the concentration of HBD-3 by at least 5%, relative to an otherwise identical cleansing composition without the active ingredient.
  • 9. The cleansing composition of claim 5, wherein the cleansing composition increases the concentration of LL-37 by at least 5%, relative to an otherwise identical cleansing composition without the active ingredient.
  • 10. The cleansing composition of claim 5, wherein the cleansing composition decreases the concentration of IL-8 by at least 5%, relative to an otherwise identical cleansing composition without the active ingredient.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/476,018, entitled “ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE STIMULATING CLEANSING COMPOSITION” and filed Mar. 31, 2017, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional patent Application Ser. No. 62/316,123, entitled “ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE STIMULATING CLEANSING COMPOSITION” and filed Mar. 31, 2016, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (349)
Number Name Date Kind
5269959 Schreibman Dec 1993 A
5352437 Nakagawa et al. Oct 1994 A
5453121 Nicholls et al. Sep 1995 A
5942479 Frankenbach et al. Aug 1999 A
5952278 Mao et al. Sep 1999 A
5981473 Barefoot et al. Nov 1999 A
6040154 Fayolle et al. Mar 2000 A
6210656 Touzan et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221847 Barefoot et al. Apr 2001 B1
6235272 Greene May 2001 B1
6358516 Harod Mar 2002 B1
6376438 Rosenberger et al. Apr 2002 B1
6423329 Sine et al. Jul 2002 B1
6509021 Weiss et al. Jan 2003 B1
6673755 Wei et al. Jan 2004 B2
6730331 Stoll May 2004 B1
6733751 Farmer May 2004 B2
6797683 Shana'a et al. Sep 2004 B2
6814958 Sekimoto Nov 2004 B1
6849256 Farmer Feb 2005 B1
6905673 Rajaiah et al. Jun 2005 B2
6924256 Massaro et al. Aug 2005 B2
7025955 Siddiqui et al. Apr 2006 B2
7070814 Qazi et al. Jul 2006 B2
7198780 Dicianna Apr 2007 B2
7241452 Veeger et al. Jul 2007 B2
7429292 McIntosh et al. Sep 2008 B2
7452545 Yu et al. Nov 2008 B2
7494661 Sanders Feb 2009 B2
7507402 Farmer et al. Mar 2009 B1
7510734 Sullivan et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514105 Qazi et al. Apr 2009 B2
7517852 Walsh et al. Apr 2009 B2
7541042 Farmer Jun 2009 B2
7547527 Baur et al. Jun 2009 B2
7560125 Ananthapadmanabhan et al. Jul 2009 B2
7611882 Bjomvad et al. Nov 2009 B2
7612027 Grasha et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618801 Jones et al. Nov 2009 B2
7632527 Jochim et al. Dec 2009 B2
7651680 Breton et al. Jan 2010 B2
7666824 Krzysik et al. Feb 2010 B2
7713726 Farmer May 2010 B2
7758878 Scimeca et al. Jul 2010 B2
7776346 O'Connor et al. Aug 2010 B2
7803746 Luu et al. Sep 2010 B2
7820420 Whitlock Oct 2010 B2
7824665 Miyamoto et al. Nov 2010 B2
7910143 Kvist et al. Mar 2011 B2
7928087 Fack et al. Apr 2011 B2
7939107 Pleva May 2011 B2
8034385 Golz-Berner et al. Oct 2011 B2
3057830 Brumbaugh et al. Nov 2011 A1
8067351 Holerca et al. Nov 2011 B2
8080258 Rothman Dec 2011 B2
8084409 Lucka et al. Dec 2011 B2
8088174 Neplaz et al. Jan 2012 B2
8097573 Lutrario et al. Jan 2012 B2
8101214 Park et al. Jan 2012 B2
8114658 Murayama et al. Feb 2012 B2
8119583 Day et al. Feb 2012 B2
8124573 Focht et al. Feb 2012 B2
8137706 Al-Ghazzewi et al. Mar 2012 B2
8173143 Tecco et al. May 2012 B2
8222020 Forsgren Brusk et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236744 Boyke et al. Aug 2012 B2
8246946 Cobb et al. Aug 2012 B2
8257753 Dal Farra et al. Sep 2012 B2
8283136 Tagg et al. Oct 2012 B2
8318659 Lowe et al. Nov 2012 B2
8329672 Rull Prous et al. Dec 2012 B2
8333954 Seidling et al. Dec 2012 B2
8337915 Aburdeineh et al. Dec 2012 B2
8349803 Dal Farra et al. Jan 2013 B2
8361450 Johnson et al. Jan 2013 B2
8377679 Baur et al. Feb 2013 B2
8420627 Guthery Apr 2013 B2
8455411 Kilthau et al. Jun 2013 B2
8481299 Gueniche Jul 2013 B2
8506952 Minbiole et al. Aug 2013 B2
8575083 Bettiol et al. Nov 2013 B2
8586067 Okamoto et al. Nov 2013 B2
8697055 Farmer Apr 2014 B2
8753654 Narula et al. Jun 2014 B2
8753861 Cascao-Pereira et al. Jun 2014 B2
8772222 Baker et al. Jul 2014 B2
8778863 Pipko Jul 2014 B2
8785171 Souter et al. Jul 2014 B2
8801864 Brooke Aug 2014 B2
8815538 Lanzalaco et al. Aug 2014 B2
8821854 Farmer et al. Sep 2014 B2
8822179 Preston, III et al. Sep 2014 B2
8834855 Johnsen et al. Sep 2014 B2
8859627 Found Oct 2014 B2
8877259 Florence et al. Nov 2014 B2
8951775 Castiel et al. Feb 2015 B2
8956624 Schnittger et al. Feb 2015 B2
8993006 Hines et al. Mar 2015 B2
8999399 Lisowsky et al. Apr 2015 B2
9062215 Cuni Bravo et al. Jun 2015 B2
9096821 Hope et al. Aug 2015 B1
9107920 Olsen Aug 2015 B2
9109189 Perez-Prat Vinuesa et al. Aug 2015 B2
9125768 Husmark et al. Sep 2015 B2
9133417 Tajmamet et al. Sep 2015 B2
9198852 Burt et al. Dec 2015 B2
9220736 Farmer et al. Dec 2015 B2
9233062 Florence et al. Jan 2016 B2
9248206 Brown Feb 2016 B2
9265708 Yumioka et al. Feb 2016 B2
9301982 Lefkowitz Apr 2016 B2
10874700 Gantz et al. Dec 2020 B2
20020076422 Shah et al. Jun 2002 A1
20040243076 Husmark et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050086744 Watkins et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050137102 Shoaf et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050271595 Brown Dec 2005 A1
20060140899 Koenig et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060171936 Gueniche et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204466 Littau et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060210499 Hoeffkes et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060276369 Levecke et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060278255 Drogue et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070020213 Tamarkin et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027119 Ahmed et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070053863 Lee et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070154411 Barth et al. Jul 2007 A1
20080045491 Fitchmun Feb 2008 A1
20080095731 Mitra Apr 2008 A1
20080107699 Spigelman et al. May 2008 A1
20080112907 Chan et al. May 2008 A1
20080124286 Lisson May 2008 A1
20080139432 Peffly et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080160043 Kim et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080193406 Rull Prous et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080206211 Gueniche Aug 2008 A1
20080206214 Farmer Aug 2008 A1
20080226603 Al-Ghazzewi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080226756 Willemin et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080233075 Sokolinsky et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080233091 Ross et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080233104 Farmer Sep 2008 A1
20080241226 Abeln et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080241263 Prous et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247960 Yuan Oct 2008 A1
20080247993 Reindl et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255249 Hellwege et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080261916 Jaszberenyi et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080268024 Rull Prous et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080293669 Moriya et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090017147 Lintner et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090022700 Cassin et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090022819 Gueniche et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028805 Gueniche et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090035294 Make et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090060962 Castiel et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090068150 Park et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090068160 Castiel et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090068161 Gueniche et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090068219 Elie et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090074735 Joshi Mar 2009 A1
20090081143 Mammone et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090099129 Meuser et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090123448 Bozonnet et al. May 2009 A1
20090130073 Reindl et al. May 2009 A1
20090136604 Breton et al. May 2009 A1
20090142375 Vidal et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090143714 Millikin et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090156563 Baschong et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175911 Cutting et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090180970 Tamarkin et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090186126 Farmer et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090202705 Meuser et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090214497 Park et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090214501 Knapp et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090232785 Breton et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090232892 Yamasaki et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090232942 Degre et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090238782 Vacher et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090252775 Arndt et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090297482 Dicks et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090305387 Farmer Dec 2009 A1
20090317370 Lang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100003292 Gautier et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100021532 Rao et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100022660 Wegner et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030172 Husmark et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100040710 Perrier et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055081 Richelle et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100086520 Reindl et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100086528 Olofsson et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100113372 Park et al. May 2010 A1
20100119613 Gruber et al. May 2010 A1
20100120710 Watanabe et al. May 2010 A1
20100121304 Zhou et al. May 2010 A1
20100158988 Redmond et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100159028 Shultz Jun 2010 A1
20100190872 Sedmak Jul 2010 A1
20100196295 Alvarado et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100197551 Bettiol et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100197552 Koyuncu et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100197553 Barnabas et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100197554 Koyuncu et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100198177 Yahiaoui et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209407 Pain et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100216892 Schmaus et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100221226 Aubert-Jacquin et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100226892 Gueniche Sep 2010 A1
20100233128 Panasenko Sep 2010 A1
20100254948 Giuliani et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100260809 Valentova et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272839 Gueniche et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100278793 Gueniche et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291049 Izawa et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100303931 Feltin et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100317743 Macinga et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100330013 O'Connell et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100330128 Kang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331429 Lorant Dec 2010 A1
20110002891 Minbiole et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110027221 Fu et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110034393 Justen et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110038840 Chen et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110052514 Justen et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110052519 Serraima et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110064835 Martin et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110117032 Gilding May 2011 A1
20110143007 Stengel Jun 2011 A1
20110150952 Simonnet et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110151009 Golz-Berner et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110177140 Voegeli et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110182861 Castiel et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110182863 Jia Jul 2011 A1
20110189133 Tagg et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110189343 Hasegawa et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110201536 O'Connell et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110223219 Dao et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110262558 Huckfeldt et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110274676 Farmer et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110280850 Starr et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110294731 Torfi Dec 2011 A1
20110301118 Koenig Dec 2011 A1
20120003178 Koenic Jan 2012 A1
20120009132 Tholath et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120027735 Beland et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120034190 Apt et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120082657 Yim Apr 2012 A1
20120107290 Prioult et al. May 2012 A1
20120114776 Feher May 2012 A1
20120121522 Gruber et al. May 2012 A1
20120128755 Gruber et al. May 2012 A1
20120156144 Tamarkin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120156171 Breton et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164087 Carter Jun 2012 A1
20120164121 Paufique Jun 2012 A1
20120165290 Dijkhuizen et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120178731 Guthery Jul 2012 A1
20120184626 Guerra-Vega Jul 2012 A1
20120225029 Al-Qahtani Sep 2012 A1
20120225035 Suchanek et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120237494 Daly et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120251512 Farmer et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120251625 Fasiemski et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120258126 Scholler et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120258152 De Heinrich et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120263758 Chinachoti et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120294841 Gueniche et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301452 Gueniche et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120322758 Kim et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130017239 Viladot Petit et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130034596 Apert et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130039862 Malle et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130045197 Chavan et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130052185 Kim et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130053422 Edmonds et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130071470 Aburdeineh et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130089524 Petit et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130115317 Charbonneau et al. May 2013 A1
20130129653 Castiel et al. May 2013 A1
20130149257 Giori et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130230609 Modak et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130251695 Farmer et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130287708 Silberstein et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130302298 Chevalier et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130323335 Rozenblat et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140004165 Novejarque Conde Jan 2014 A1
20140004214 Kedrowski et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140023693 Guenzburg et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140037688 Berkes et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140065209 Putaala et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140065210 Koenig et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140065218 Lang et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140073009 Joergensen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140079657 Resnick et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140094525 Snyder et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140099270 Fu et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140186409 Lang et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140193888 Souter et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140205651 Forsgren Brusk et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140242198 Modak et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140243423 Gurge et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140271877 Wilmott et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140301994 Klapper et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140308258 Matthews Oct 2014 A1
20140308375 Willimann Oct 2014 A1
20140322151 Fricke et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140335043 Chon et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140342437 Carpenter et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140349375 Benjamin et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140356295 Gerardi et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140356296 Stoer et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140364509 Wegner et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150024072 Chon et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150024073 Chon et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150024074 Batchvarova et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150024077 Batchvarova et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150044317 Farmer et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150073051 Cohen et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150079040 O'Neill et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150093462 Yarosh et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150148309 Riccio May 2015 A1
20150202136 Lanzalaco et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150209392 Song et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150258003 Copeland et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150265666 Modak et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150290273 Botto et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150305343 Burke et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150320038 Marthaler Nov 2015 A1
20150320809 Carpenter et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150353870 Lant Dec 2015 A1
20150374607 Lanzalaco et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160000845 Olsen Jan 2016 A1
20160008412 Putaala et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160040119 Hashman Feb 2016 A1
20160053240 Olinski et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160074312 Msika et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160074460 Deo Mar 2016 A1
20160158144 Gan et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160279075 Redmond et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170281660 Zapka et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281694 Gantz et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281695 Gantz et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281717 Tian et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281718 Tian et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180140527 Tian et al. May 2018 A1
20180140539 Gantz et al. May 2018 A1
20180140540 Gantz et al. May 2018 A1
20180140545 Tian et al. May 2018 A1
20210077544 Gantz et al. Mar 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (210)
Number Date Country
PI201010487 Oct 2013 BR
101129311 Feb 2008 CN
102000009 Jun 2012 CN
102000009 Jun 2012 CN
103599051 Feb 2014 CN
103751072 Apr 2014 CN
104274357 Jan 2015 CN
104666285 Jun 2015 CN
104862098 Aug 2015 CN
104997674 Oct 2015 CN
105106062 Dec 2015 CN
105482915 Apr 2016 CN
102004011968 Sep 2005 DE
102011009798 Aug 2012 DE
102012002592 Aug 2013 DE
102013225844 Jun 2015 DE
1060745 Dec 2000 EP
1736537 Dec 2006 EP
1594554 Jan 2007 EP
1438072 May 2008 EP
1920774 May 2008 EP
1911494 Jul 2008 EP
1965765 Sep 2008 EP
1344528 Oct 2008 EP
1455802 Oct 2008 EP
1778258 Jan 2009 EP
2019133 Jan 2009 EP
1602377 Jun 2009 EP
2081606 Jul 2009 EP
1296701 Sep 2009 EP
1311238 Oct 2009 EP
1529097 Oct 2009 EP
1787651 Feb 2010 EP
1301078 Mar 2010 EP
1672015 Nov 2010 EP
2305212 Apr 2011 EP
2308566 Apr 2011 EP
1353631 Sep 2011 EP
2364712 Sep 2011 EP
2430135 Mar 2012 EP
2441433 Apr 2012 EP
1739095 Aug 2012 EP
2556823 Feb 2013 EP
2929873 Oct 2015 EP
2908306 May 2008 FR
2912055 Aug 2008 FR
2916634 Dec 2008 FR
2930155 Oct 2009 FR
2937548 Apr 2010 FR
2938768 May 2010 FR
2940098 Jun 2010 FR
2942720 Sep 2010 FR
2956818 Sep 2011 FR
2959126 Oct 2011 FR
2963560 Feb 2012 FR
2968990 Jun 2012 FR
2973381 Oct 2012 FR
3040624 Mar 2017 FR
2391476 Feb 2004 GB
2466195 Jun 2010 GB
2472790 Feb 2011 GB
06009349 Jan 1994 JP
06287106 Oct 1994 JP
2000143513 May 2000 JP
2007186505 Jul 2007 JP
2008099632 May 2008 JP
2008105983 May 2008 JP
2008179595 Aug 2008 JP
2008179601 Aug 2008 JP
2008194026 Aug 2008 JP
2008212111 Sep 2008 JP
2008308478 Dec 2008 JP
2009084228 Apr 2009 JP
2009143860 Jul 2009 JP
2009144165 Jul 2009 JP
2009242309 Oct 2009 JP
2009292808 Dec 2009 JP
2010006757 Jan 2010 JP
2010126484 Jun 2010 JP
2010132629 Jun 2010 JP
2010143885 Jul 2010 JP
2010150240 Jul 2010 JP
2010270152 Dec 2010 JP
2011168520 Sep 2011 JP
2011195537 Oct 2011 JP
2011195601 Oct 2011 JP
2011195843 Oct 2011 JP
2012188453 Oct 2012 JP
2010130094 Dec 2010 KR
2011026237 Mar 2011 KR
1020110088800 Aug 2011 KR
219328 Apr 2015 PL
9606153 Feb 1996 WO
9629867 Oct 1996 WO
9749793 Dec 1997 WO
9847374 Oct 1998 WO
0006116 Feb 2000 WO
0113927 Mar 2001 WO
0245727 Jun 2002 WO
03028738 Apr 2003 WO
03086274 Oct 2003 WO
2004055041 Jul 2004 WO
2005016364 Feb 2005 WO
2005027893 Mar 2005 WO
2006015726 Feb 2006 WO
2006104403 Oct 2006 WO
2006118942 Nov 2006 WO
2008021441 Feb 2008 WO
2008047908 Apr 2008 WO
2008015343 May 2008 WO
2008040516 May 2008 WO
2008114376 Sep 2008 WO
2008146116 Dec 2008 WO
2008148694 Dec 2008 WO
2009017463 Feb 2009 WO
2009031099 Mar 2009 WO
2009050677 Apr 2009 WO
2009053564 Apr 2009 WO
2009066537 May 2009 WO
2009077749 Jun 2009 WO
2009086614 Jul 2009 WO
2009087356 Jul 2009 WO
2009095456 Aug 2009 WO
2009127057 Oct 2009 WO
2009141542 Nov 2009 WO
2009141544 Nov 2009 WO
2010013182 Feb 2010 WO
2010061383 Jun 2010 WO
2010087373 Aug 2010 WO
2010126414 Nov 2010 WO
2010128906 Nov 2010 WO
2010130541 Nov 2010 WO
2011019668 Feb 2011 WO
2011029784 Mar 2011 WO
2011048554 Apr 2011 WO
2011061144 May 2011 WO
2011064524 Jun 2011 WO
2011065772 Jun 2011 WO
2011073437 Jun 2011 WO
2011117547 Sep 2011 WO
2011130788 Oct 2011 WO
2011157968 Dec 2011 WO
2011158027 Dec 2011 WO
2012000960 Jan 2012 WO
2012000961 Jan 2012 WO
2012000963 Jan 2012 WO
2012013764 Feb 2012 WO
2012013776 Feb 2012 WO
2012022478 Feb 2012 WO
2012022773 Feb 2012 WO
2012049697 Apr 2012 WO
2012055408 May 2012 WO
2012062895 May 2012 WO
2012067321 May 2012 WO
2012071654 Jun 2012 WO
2012072951 Jun 2012 WO
2012076321 Jun 2012 WO
2012082065 Jun 2012 WO
2012084701 Jun 2012 WO
2012107550 Aug 2012 WO
2012118535 Sep 2012 WO
2012120290 Sep 2012 WO
2012129683 Oct 2012 WO
2012149110 Nov 2012 WO
2012150269 Nov 2012 WO
2012152270 Nov 2012 WO
2012160289 Nov 2012 WO
2013000717 Jan 2013 WO
2013050697 Apr 2013 WO
2013068962 May 2013 WO
2013072322 May 2013 WO
2013073431 May 2013 WO
2013087665 Jun 2013 WO
2013089720 Jun 2013 WO
2013100003 Jul 2013 WO
2013120481 Aug 2013 WO
2013122931 Aug 2013 WO
2013130829 Sep 2013 WO
2013149323 Oct 2013 WO
2013171343 Nov 2013 WO
2013188626 Dec 2013 WO
2013190542 Dec 2013 WO
2014043304 Mar 2014 WO
2014044957 Mar 2014 WO
2014064397 May 2014 WO
2014107572 Jul 2014 WO
2014131191 Sep 2014 WO
2014155111 Oct 2014 WO
2014162125 Oct 2014 WO
2014197168 Dec 2014 WO
2015000972 Jan 2015 WO
2015075440 May 2015 WO
2015089441 Jun 2015 WO
2015106175 Jul 2015 WO
2015120100 Aug 2015 WO
2015124943 Aug 2015 WO
2015138296 Sep 2015 WO
2015138479 Sep 2015 WO
2015143360 Sep 2015 WO
2015151009 Oct 2015 WO
2015171899 Nov 2015 WO
2015185689 Dec 2015 WO
2015189049 Dec 2015 WO
2016007314 Jan 2016 WO
2016161074 Oct 2016 WO
2016172686 Oct 2016 WO
2017173236 Oct 2017 WO
2017173240 Oct 2017 WO
2017173241 Oct 2017 WO
2017173242 Oct 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (47)
Entry
Flax—Wikipedia, pp. 1-15, accessed on Feb. 17, 2022 (Year: 2022).
Saponin—Wikipedia, pp. 1-7, accessed on Feb. 17, 2022 (Year: 2022).
Betaine—Wikipedia, pp. 1-3, accessed on Feb. 17, 2022 (Year: 2022).
Kabra et al, A review of herbal surfactant, online tutorial for GPAT, Apr. 30, 2013 (Year: 2013).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/025326 dated Jun. 9, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/025319 dated Jul. 17, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/025324 dated Jun. 14, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/025323 dated Jun. 27, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/025329 dated Jul. 21, 2017.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees from PCT/US2017/062766 dated Feb. 26, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/062797 dated Feb. 19, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/062807 dated Mar. 2, 2018.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2017/062784 dated Feb. 22, 2018.
Anonymous, “Ashland Care Specialties Announces Skin's Ecology, an Initiative for Probiotic Effects—PRODUKTNEUHEITEN—SOFW” Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.sofw.com/ndex/sofw de/sofw de_produktneuhei ten. html ?naid=5133 retrieved on Jun. 8, 2017] the whole document. Mar. 5, 2013 XP055379410.
Arif, “The Formulation Basics for Personal Cleansers,” Pilot Chemical Co., 2009, 5 pages.
Bockmuhl, D. et al. “Prebiotic Cosmetics: an Alternative To Antibacterial Products,” Int'l J of Cosmetic Scl, vol. 29, Issue 1, Feb. 13, 2007 Abstract.
Branco, C. et al. “Modulation of Skin Microbiota By Topical Prebiotics”, Monographic Supplement Series: Skin Care—Household and Personal Care Today, vol. 10(2) Mar./Apr. 2015, p. 21-27.
Dong Z et al., Composition, Useful for Claning Hair, Comprises Chichona Tree Tincture, Saponin Tincture, Eucalyptus Tincture, Flaxseed Extract, Ethyl Alcohol, and Active Comonent Comprising Vitamin E, Ectoine and Vitamin B5, Clarivate Analytics, vol. 2015, No. 27, Jan. 14, 2015 Abstract.
Eishaghbee et al., “Ethanol Production By Selected Intestinal Microorganisms and Lactic Acid Bacteria Growing Under Different Nutritional Conditions,” Frontiers in Microbiology, Driginal Research, Jan. 2016, vol. 7, Aarticle 47, pp. 1-13.
Fehlbaum P et al., “An Essential Amino Acid Induces Epithelial Beta-Defnsin Expression,” Proceedings National Academy of Sciences PNAS, National Academy of Sciences, US, vol. 97, No. 23, Nov. 7, 2000, pp. 12723-12728.
Firas A Al-Bayati, “Antibacterial Activity of Linum Usitati Ssimum L. Seeds and Active Compound Detection”, Rafi Dai N Journal of Science, Mosul University Faculty, IQ, vol. 18, No. 2, Jan. 1, 2007, pp. 27-36.
“Gaurav Kaithwas et al., ““Linum Usitati Ssimum (Linseed/Flaxseed) Fixed Oil: Antimicrobial Activity and Efficacy in Bovine Mastitis””, Inflammopharmacology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL, vol. 19, No. 1, Feb. 1, 2011, pp. 45-52.”.
Hill et al., The International Scientic Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics Consensus Statement On the Scope and Apprpriate Use of the Term Proboiotic, Expert Consensus Document, Nature Reviews/Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 11, No. 8, Aug. 1, 2015, pp. 506-514.
Hutkins et al., “Prebiotics: Why Definitions Matter,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 37, Sep. 29, 2015, pp. 1-7.
Jimborean et al. “Use of Essential Oils from Citrus sinensis in the Development of New Type of Yogurt”, Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine CLUJ-Napoca. Food Science and Technology, vol. 73, No. 1, May 1, 2016.
Karamac et al., “Antioxidant Activity of Hydrolysates Prepared From Flaxseed Cake Proteins Using Pancreatin,” Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 2014, vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 227-233.
Kimble et al., “Use of a Fluorometric Microplate Assay To Assess the Activty of Prebiotics and Probiotics Against Uropathogenic E. Coli Adherence To Human Uroepithelial Cells,” Faseb Journal, vol. 29, No. Suppl 1, Apr. 1, 2015, p. 607.9.
Lactic Acid, Skin Deep Cosmetic Database, EWG, 2019.
Lucera et al., Food Applicatons of Natural Antimicrobial Compounds, Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 3, pp. 1-13, Aug. 8, 2012.
Marambe, et al., An In-Vitro Investigation of Selected Biological Activities of Hydrolysed Flaxseed (Linum Usitatissimum L.) Proteins, J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2008, vol. 85, pp. 1155-1164.
Mintel, “Baby's Body Wash” Apr. 2014 XP002777898.
Mintel, “Body Wash” Dec. 2009 XP002777900.
Mintel, “Moisturizing Body Wash” Jan. 2013 XP002777899.
Mintel, “Shower Gel” Jul. 2016 XP002777896.
Mintel, “Shower Gel” Nov. 2014 XP002777897.
Mintel; “Hand Gel” Nov. 2014 XP002777823, retrieved from www.gnpd.com.
Ohara et al., “L-Lactic Acid Production By Bacillus Sp. in Anaerobic and Aerobic Culture,” Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 272-274, 1996.
Rousseau et al., “Prebiotic Effects of Oligosaccharides On Selected Vaginal Lactobacilli and Pathogenic Microorganisms,” Anae London, GB, vol. 11, No. 3, Jun. 1, 2005, pp. 145-153.
Shim et al., “Flaxseed (Linum Usitatissim Um L.) Bioactive Compound and Peptide Nomenclature: a Review” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 38, Issue 1, Jul. 2014, pp. 5-20.
Shoaf K et al., “Prebiotic Galactooligosaccharides Reduce Adherence of Enteropathogenic-Escherichia Coli To Tissue Culture Cells,” Infection and Immunity, American Society for Microbiology, vol. 74, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2006, pp. 6920-6928.
Ueda et al., “Topical and Transdermal Drug Products,” Pharmacopeial Forum, vol. 35(3); pp. 750-764, May-Jun. 2009.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clostridium (Year: 2020).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escherichia_coli (Year: 2020).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactobacillus (Year: 2020).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccharomyces (Year: 2020).
International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook, Fifteenth Edition, 2014, pp. 3317 to 3319.
Frick (Premium Beauty News, Dec. 2013, https://www.premiumbeautynews.com/en/the-microbiota-part-2,6265) (Year: 2013).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210169967 A1 Jun 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62316123 Mar 2016 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15476018 Mar 2017 US
Child 17022229 US