The present invention relates to a method of making an antimicrobial whirlpool bathtub.
Whirlpool-type baths have been employed to treat discomfort resulting from strained muscles, joint ailments and the like. More recently, such baths have been used increasingly as means of relaxing from the daily stresses of modern life. A therapeutic effect is derived from bubbling water and swirling jet streams that create an invigorating hydro massage of the user's body.
To create the desired whirlpool motion and hydro massage effect, a motorized water pump draws water through a suction fitting in a receptacle, such as a bathtub. The user first fills the bathtub. Then the user activates the closed loop whirlpool system. The water travels through a piping system and back out jet fittings. Jet fittings are typically employed to inject water at a high velocity into a bathtub. Usually the jet fittings are adapted to aspirate air so that the water discharged into the receptacle is aerated to achieve the desired bubbling effect. (See for instance, U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,039 to Hibbard et al., incorporated herein by reference from U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,167 to Mattson, Jr. et al. (“Mattson”) which is incorporated herein by reference.
Generally, whirlpool baths are designed as with a normal bathtub to be drained after each use. However, debris in the form of dead skin, soap, hair and other foreign material circulates throughout the piping and pump system. This debris does not completely drain and over time, accumulates in the piping system and may cause a health risk. Therefore, a filtration system designed for whirlpool baths was desirable. Mattson provides for a filtration system, which filters debris in the water with respect to whirlpool baths. The present invention improves upon the Mattson filtration system for whirlpool baths. Before Mattson, filtration systems were found only in indoor and outdoor pools.
For some time, whirlpool bath manufacturers have tried to devise a way to incorporate a filtration system on a closed loop whirlpool bath. Although many problems exist, compliance with the plumbing codes is the major obstacle faced in using a filtration system for a whirlpool bath. Until Mattson, there was no filtration system that specifically designed for a drain down whirlpool bath that allows a whirlpool bath to pass requirements set forth by the current plumbing code.
Whirlpool baths must meet stringent drain down code requirements set up by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). The code that governs whirlpool baths is entitled “Whirlpool Bath Appliances” (ASME A112.19.7M 1995). Section 5 of this code covers water retention and provides: “whirlpool bath appliances shall be of such design as to prevent retention of water in excess of 44 ml. (1½ fl oz) for each jet and suction filter.”
The average whirlpool bath has a six-jet system and has one suction fitting. In order to meet code, a six-jet/one suction system configuration may only retain 10½ ounces of water in the complete whirlpool bath system after draining. Most quality whirlpool baths, however, retain less than 4 ounces of water in the whirlpool bath system after draining. The filter part of the system cannot retain over 6½ ounces of water, because the total water retention would then exceed 10½ ounces. Mattson is currently the only known filtration system designed for whirlpool baths that retains less than 6½ ounces of water. The complete filtration system of the present invention, however, retains less than 4 ounces of water and as little as 2 ounces of water; so most whirlpool bath companies could use it on their whirlpool bath models and pass the drain down codes for whirlpool baths.
Another important consideration in developing a filtration system for whirlpool baths is the ease of replacing the filter. To eliminate access panels on the underside of the whirlpool bath which are used to access the filter, the filtration system was designed so the filter could be replaced from inside the bath. Therefore, the most logical choice for a filter location is in the suction fitting. However, placing the filter in the suction fitting presents a different range of design concerns. For example, placing a filter in the suction fitting may cause undue stress on the pump motor.
The suction filter must pass the codes set up by ASME for suctions which include a variety of load and structural tests. The code for suctions from ASME is titled Suction Fittings For Use in Swimming Pools, Spas, Hot Tubs, and Whirlpool Bathtub Appliances (ASME/IAMPO reaffirm 1996). Presently there is only one patented whirlpool bathtub suction filter that passes ASME code to be placed on a whirlpool bathtub. See Mattson incorporated herein. The present invention provides a cavity that houses a filter that could be installed in such a way that the filter is replaced from the inside of a whirlpool bath.
The filter was designed to be small to meet the drain down requirements. Because of its small size, however, it also had to be very efficient. Therefore, the present invention has a specially designed filter core. The core is engineered with varying spaced and sized holes along the length of the core. This design allows water to be drawn through the entire filter. Without this design, the filter would only pull water through about 20% of the filter near the outlet.
Other problems in whirlpool bathtub and spa use are encountered when a user's hair is twisted and entrapped in the whirlpool bath pump impeller. Hair entrapment occurs when a bather's hair becomes entangled in a suction fitting drain cover as the water and hair are drawn powerfully through the drain. The Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued a safety alert article entitled “Children Drown and More Are Injured From Hair Entrapment In Drain Covers For Spas, Hot Tubs, And Whirlpool Bathtubs” (CPSC Document #5067). The safety alert urges consumers to ask their spa, hot tub, and whirlpool bathtub dealers for drain covers that meet voluntary standard ASME/ANSI A112.19.8M 1987) to help reduce hair entrapment. The present invention meets the voluntary ASME/ANSI standard.
The present invention also provides a new faceplate cover which is easily removable. The faceplate also has to pass the heavy load, impact and hair entrapment tests set out by ASME/IAMPO. One cover embodiment has a radius and back ribbing on it and a removable insert support to pass the strength tests. An embodiment of the faceplate is flat with structural fins on its back side, thus eliminating the removable insert. Each cover has a sufficient number of sized holes to pass the prescribed hair entrapment tests. The result is the fluid suction filter device that is especially made just for whirlpool baths.
In the safety alert CPSC Document #5067, the Consumer Product Safety Commission suggests that consumers shut down the spa until the drain cover is replaced in the event that the consumer discovers the drain cover missing or broken. The present invention allows the water system to shut itself down if the faceplate drain cover is missing or broken by means of a non-electric cavitation mechanism. The water system is also shut down if a clog occurs.
It is found that even after debris is filtered from a whirlpool bathtub, trace amounts of bacteria still can grow in a whirlpool bathtub. In fact, even if normal tap water where to be run through the closed looped system of a whirlpool bathtub, trace amounts of bacteria can form in the whirlpool bathtubs closed looped piping system. To eliminate these trace bacteria, a special filter core with an antimicrobial chamber was developed.
This antimicrobial chamber emits antimicrobial agents to kill the trace bacteria that may grow in the whirlpool bathtub's closed looped piping system, upon initial whirlpool bathtub activation and between usages. However, most of the antimicrobial agents would dissipate as soon as they enter the inside of the bathtub where people bathe. In other words, due to breakdown and dissipation, the antimicrobial agents do not build up in the bath water as the whirlpool operates. Therefore, the user may activate the antimicrobial dispenser mechanism to distribute antimicrobial agents at will or on a timed basis. The antimicrobial dispenser is a top filled design not known in the prior art. Another embodiment teaches the use of multiple chambers wherein each chamber is used for additional additives desired by the user.
Only a very small amount of antimicrobial agent is necessary to kill the bacteria in the closed looped piping system since the filter helps to trap hair, soap and other debris, which provides food for bacterial growth. Without the filter a greater amount of antimicrobial agent would need to be introduced into the system to kill the bacteria and this excessive amount could irritate the skin of sensitive bathers.
Another integral part of creating a total water vessel sanitation system is to include antimicrobial additives in each component of the water vessel. With respect to whirlpool bathtubs and spas, this would include at least the system's water and air pipes, pump, and pump impellor. The surfaces of whirlpool bathtubs and spas are comprised primarily of a thermo-formed acrylic or plastic sheet or gelcoat paint. Therefore, in a total water sanitation system, the acrylic or plastic sheet or the gelcoat paint would require antimicrobial additives. The fiberglass and resin reinforcement backing of the whirlpool bathtub and spa are impregnated with antimicrobial additives, as are the whirlpool bathtub jets and suctions. While the technology exists to add antimicrobial additives to a whirlpool bathtub and spa component, there is no prior art that suggests that antimicrobial additives be placed in one or more component or in combination with all components to provide for optimum protection from bacteria.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,167 (2002) to Mattson, Jr. et al. discloses a whirlpool bath with combination suction fixture and disposable filter. The housing of the suction filter is one to two feet long. A correspondingly sized replaceable filter is mounted into the filter housing lengthwise.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,283,308 (2001) to Patil et al. discloses a bacteriostatic filter cartridge having elements impregnated with an anti-microbial agent.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,799,339 (1998) to Perry et al. discloses a suction device for a spa or jetted tub with a turbulence reduction design to reduce the possibility of entangling a user's hair in the faceplate.
The main aspect of the present invention is to provide a method to make an antimicrobial whirlpool bathtub.
Other aspects of this invention will appear from the following description and appended claims, reference being made to the accompanying drawings forming a part of this specification wherein like reference characters designate corresponding parts in the several views.
The suction filter is comprised of the filter core, the filter, and the filter housing. The filter core has a plurality of water draw holes having increasing diameters extending away from the water outlet. These holes provide for water draw along the entire length of the filter, instead of just making use of the filter at the outlet and of the filter. These increasing and decreasing holes provide for optimum water draw through the filter that surrounds the core. The filter core has a 2″ inside diameter (I.D.) to assure over 200 GPM water flow draw rates. Without this I.D., you would not be able to get 200 GPM to run through the filter core allowing a combination filter suction an overall 200 GPM rating. No other manufacturer makes a filter for whirlpool bathtubs or even a filter that fits into a housing outlet with a 2″ I.D. The core is made from injected plastic but could be machined from metal or a variety of other materials.
The filter core has an antimicrobial chamber that houses antimicrobial additives. The antimicrobial chamber measures approximately 1″ to 8″ in length and ½ to 2″ in diameter. The antimicrobial additives used in the antimicrobial chamber could be slow dissolving chlorine, bromine, or a variety of other antimicrobial additives. The cover to the antimicrobial chamber has an adjusting hole opening which can be increased or decreased by turning the main body of the antimicrobial chamber in one direction or another. The more the antimicrobial chamber is screwed on, the smaller the hole opening becomes. The antimicrobial chamber has one hole but could have multiple holes or slots. The filter core's plastic is injected with antimicrobial additives during the injected molding process and inhibits any germ growth on the core between uses.
Multiple chambers may be added on the filter core along with the antimicrobial chamber for the addition of other additives. For example, the filter core may have a built in ion exchange chamber allowing for a built in water softener that softens the bathwater. It may also have a fragrance chamber that emits fragrances into the bathwater. Both of these items are not known in prior art for a suction filter core for a whirlpool bathtub or spa.
Water flows past the antimicrobial chamber creating a vacuum which pulls a small quantity of antimicrobial additive from the chamber, thereby mixing it with the water. The amount of antimicrobial additives mixed into the water is in sufficient quantities to kill the trace bacteria that may grow between whirlpool bath usages in a filtered whirlpool bathtub system. The antimicrobial additives dissipate by the time the antimicrobial additives mix and enter the larger volume of water in the bathing area.
A filter which is generally treated with antimicrobial additives either slips over the filter core or is bonded onto the core making a one-piece filter core combination. Although the filter could be pleated or non-pleated, an embodiment has a two staged pleat filter media. The first pleat has larger holes, which allow larger sized particles and debris to pass through the antimicrobial treated filter pleat. The second pleat has smaller openings allowing only microscopic debris particles to pass through the treated filter pleat. Although microscopic debris may accumulate in the space between the inner and outer pleats, both filter media are impregnated with antimicrobial agents, which kill bacteria which would accumulate on the pleats. Together, the inner and outer pleat create a halo effect killing of the bacteria which accumulates between the inner and outer filter media. This layered filter design is important in decreasing the build up of debris on the outer layer of the filter which nearest to the bather.
The filter media is preferably made out of polypropylene or other media that will accept antimicrobial agents. In the spa industry, polyester media is used. Polypropylene media can be treated in the manufacturing process with antibacterial agents, whereas polyester media cannot. In the whirlpool industry, however, filters were not used on whirlpool baths until an approved filtration system for whirlpool baths under the Mattson '167 patent.
One embodiment of the filter is designed to retain less than 3 ounces of water.
The housing of the suction filter is generally cylindrical having a diameter of four inches to two feet. The filter housing is tapered from front to back to allow water to drain back into the tub after shutdown. An embodiment of the housing is the only known housing that has tapered sides of the inner wall to allow water to drain back into the whirlpool bathtub when the whirlpool bathtub system is deactivated whether the unit is installed facing left or right. The filter housing has a sharp radius end opposite the outlet end, thus allowing the housing to be fitted into the side wall of a tub through a standard size opening cut.
The filter housing is mounted to the inner tub wall by using a screw nut between the housing mounting flange and the inner tub wall. A gasket or silicone can be used between the outer tub wall and the screw nut to prevent leaks.
The filter core now fits into the filter housing in axial alignment with the filter housing's inlet opening. In other words, the filter is now perpendicular from that of U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,167. The filter core has two slots cut into the end that fits into the outlet of the filter housing. The filter housing has two male ridges which make the filter core the only filter core that fits that particular housing. As set forth above, the filter core is designed with varying sized holes and slots. The holes furthest from the outlet port are larger than the holes near the outlet port. This allows water to pull through the entire filter.
The filter housing has a safety cavitation port located at the inside wall of the housing. Placing a cavitation port at the inside wall of a suction fitting is not known in prior art.
The faceplate cover described below has a cavitation port fin, which covers the non-electric cavitation port when the faceplate cover is attached to the filter housing. The cavitation port fin is one of four available cavitation port fins designed to fit into a receiving bracket adjacent to the cavitation porthole. If the filter were removed or if a person tried to operate the unit without the filter core covering this hole, air from the tube would be drawn into the pump and the pump would cavitate (draw more air than water). Since people have drowned by getting their hair caught in a suction cover while their head is below the tub waterline, this is an important feature. No user could run the unit without the filter in place. This feature also reduces the chance of drawing contaminants into the whirlpool bath system. Once contaminants such as hair are entrapped in the pump's impeller, the entire whirlpool bath system becomes contaminated until someone physically opens the whirlpool bath pump (a long and time consuming process usually requiring a professional), frees the entrapped hair, and sanitizes the complete system.
The filter core has a gasket that slides over the non-electric safety cavitation port. Without this gasket, the replaceable filter core could rub against the filter housing outlet and cause wear over the years to the filter housing outlet.
The suction filter has been downsized to fit more whirlpool bathtubs. The downsized version attaches to the whirlpool bathtub with a nut which eliminates the attachment screws of U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,167. With the smaller filter design, however, filter replacement is likely to occur more often.
The present invention has two lights that are placed in a visible position on the whirlpool bathtub. The lights are hooked up to the whirlpool bathtub pump with a vacuum switch. If the combination suction filter, filter media (removable filter) accumulates enough debris, this blockage on the filter triggers a vacuum switch, which senses the blockage, and a preferably red indicator light comes on that indicates to the bather that it is time to remove and clean the removable filter or simply replace it. Otherwise a preferably green indicator light stays on indicating to the bather that the filter is not ready for replacement.
The present invention also provides another means to indicate when to replace the filter. The end cap of the filter is treated with a special chemical in the manufacturing process, which creates a color reaction when the end cap is introduced to water. The first color would indicate the filter is not ready for replacement. The second color would indicate the filter should be replaced. For example, the end cap is white before water submersion. Once water is introduced to it, the reaction begins and the end cap will slowly turn to black over a predetermined period of time. During whirlpool bathtub operation but before the predetermined period of filter life time, the end cap color will range from white to varying shades of grey until it becomes totally black. Once it turns totally black, the bather knows it is time to replace the filter. This reaction may be have a time release factor and can last from 1 to 360 days depending upon the amount of chemicals used in the end cap manufacturing.
Another inlet orifice may be added to the filter housing of the present invention. This orifice can be hooked up in tandem to a skimmer filter in a spa in order to filter water, which may bypass a filtration system. Currently spas, like whirlpool bathtubs, have one or multiple suction fittings that draw water into a pump and back out through jets. Although spas also have skimmers filters that draw surface water through the filters into a pump and back through the jets, the majority of the water passing through other suction points bypasses the filters in the skimmer causing contaminated water to circulate through the system. Most of the other suction points do not have filters. By replacing standard spa suction fittings with the present invention suction filter and hooking the outlet of the spa skimmer to one of the present invention suction filters, all water in a spa is filtered.
The faceplate shown in
In the embodiment of the faceplate shown in
The faceplate is larger than standard faceplates because of the size of the removable filter. Mattson teaches the combination of a filter and a suction in a single device. The faceplate has slots to allow a larger volume of water to pass through it. Because of the increased size of the faceplate the slots have to be designed and engineered in a radiating pattern. This is very important for the plastic injected molding process.
With the present design over a horizontal (see Perry '339 patent) or vertical design, the pressure of the injected plastic from the injection point of the mold (usually the injection point of a mold is located in the center of the mold) hits the small end of the slots instead of the wide end of the slots. The shorter end of the slot can withstand a great deal more pressure over time before failure than if the pressure were subjected to the wide side of the slots. This allows for much longer mold life and a more pleasing finished product. The radiating pattern of slots gives a straight-line flow to the outer edge of the faceplate part. U.S. Pat. No. 5,799,339 FIG. 4 shows a standard slot opening arrangement that represents the arrangement of slots used by manufacturers of slotted face faceplates. U.S. Pat. No. 6,038,712 to Chalberg et al. FIG. 2 shows circular hole openings which represent how other faceplates are made. Slots are preferable over circular holes to increase flow.
One embodiment of the faceplate housing eliminates the drain down slots of the original design because water now evacuates through the bottom slots of the faceplate.
To prevent people's hair or body parts from getting trapped in the exposed hole where the faceplate cover is removed during whirlpool bath operation, current ASME plumbing code requires that all suction faceplate covers be engineered so the faceplate cannot be removed without the use of a tool. Most suction covers attach the faceplate to the housing with a screw and a screwdriver is needed to remove the screw. See U.S. Pat. No. 6,038,712 FIG. 2, which shows screw hole openings and U.S. Pat. No. 5,799,339 FIG. 3 number 22, which shows the screw. There are some suction manufacturers that have a non-electric cavitation device in the faceplate of the suction, see Chalberg U.S. Pat. No. 6,038,712. If the face of the suction is restricted significantly, the unit cavitates and the suction against the faceplate decreases. However, these designs are still dangerous. Hair can still become twisted in the faceplate before the unit shuts down. It is thought that if hair enters the Chalberg '712 cover and the cover is blocked to cease suction action, the hair can be easily removed. However, when hair enters a suction cover a vortex may form behind the cover causing the hair to twist and tangle, thereby preventing removal. Once the hair is trapped, you need a tool like a screwdriver by code to take the faceplate off. The entrapped hair can trap the head of the user under the tub's waterline. Therefore, people still can drown with these devices.
As stated above, the code requirement for a tool to remove the faceplate is to prevent body parts or hair from getting trapped in the exposed housing support cross members (which are an integral nonremovable part of the suction body in the event that the faceplate of current suctions is removed. But because one embodiment of the suction filter will not operate without the filter in place, there is no need for the screw. The faceplate preferably attaches to the faceplate housing with magnets. The magnet hole openings of the housing are recessed for flush mounting. They also are flat recessed.
With the design of the present invention, there is no danger of limb entrapment because the system would simply not operate. If someone did get his or her hair caught in the faceplate while the filter was in place, the whole faceplate pops off easily as the faceplate is held in place by magnets. As soon as the faceplate pops off, the cavitation fin which normally covers the safety cavitation port would move out of place. Once the non-electric cavitation port is uncovered, the pump cavitates, thereby immediately preventing body limbs or hair from becoming entrapped in the exposed suction opening. The suction cover has a pull-tab on the cover to allow the bather to easily remove the cover when the whirlpool bath pump is in operation if desired. Depending on the alignment of the faceplate with the faceplate housing, the pull tab could be at any of four locations, i.e., bottom, top, left, or right.
If the unit were to run without the faceplate cover, and hair is caught in the exposed filter, the filter itself also pops out easily. Therefore, there is no chance of getting entrapped if the filter is removed, because the unit will also cavitate under these circumstances.
With the present invention, we plan to have ASME revise their codes for suction covers to allow them to be removable without a tool such as a screwdriver.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/417,156 SORENSEN, EDWIN C. shows a break away drain cover for a spa. Sorensen operates a magnetically actuated switch transmitting an electrical signal. It does not have a safe non-electrical safety cavitation port like the present invention. People are concerned when any electrical signal is transmitted in a water vessel. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 2001/0013373 WRIGHT, JAMES R. shows a drain cover which is similar to the drain cover of Sorensen.
Both these inventions are drain covers and not suction fittings because they do not conform to ASME suction fitting codes. Neither pass the ASME code requirements set out in Section 4 for “Suction Fittings For Use in Swimming Pools, Spas, Hot Tubs, and Whirlpool Bathtub Appliances” (ASME/ANSI A112.19M-1987 reaffirm 1996) and Section 7 ASME A112.19.7M-1995, the hair entrapment test. Sorensen uses a “snap fit” to attach the faceplate to a drain wall fitting that may present a wear problem over the years as the cover is repeatedly put on and taken off. The present invention uses earth magnets that will last the lifetime of the spa or bath it is placed on.
Further, the Sorensen invention does not claim, when used in conjunction with a whirlpool bath instead of a spa, that it will allow the whirlpool bath to meet the drain down requirements of ASME A112.19.7M-1995, “Whirlpool Bathtub Appliances.” The present invention does so claim. Another advantage of the present invention over Sorensen is that the non-electric cavitation safety feature (combination port hole, air tube, faceplate, cavitation fin) costs a fraction of what a signal-transmitting device would cost to manufacture. Therefore, while there is prior art for electronics-based breakaway covers in a variety of inventions, there is no prior art for a breakaway cover that utilizes a cost saving non-electrical cavitation port. Being non-electrical makes the present invention very safe for whirlpool bath, spa and swimming pool applications.
The faceplate back support ribbing is designed in an X pattern, which offers outstanding structural integrity. The circular ribbing adds tremendous strength to the center impact point of the faceplate.
The faceplate is designed to protrude less than ½″ into the tub when attached to the faceplate housing. This streamlined design protrudes much less than most current suctions adding more room to the bathing area of the whirlpool bathtub.
The slotted holes on the top, sides and bottom of the faceplate extend outward keeping in line with the radiating design pattern on the face of the faceplate. This makes it an easier part to inject with plastic.
Because the center faceplate is an area that would have a high fluid intake flow, the center of the faceplate is solid. This solid center section evens out the water flow across the rest of the faceplate so that there are no areas of high flow that would create unwanted areas of high suction force.
Support bars (or ribs) are integrally formed on the backside of the faceplate. The support bars are at right angles to each other and extend between opposite sidewalls of the faceplate. The support bars do not obstruct any of the faceplate slots formed in the face and sidewalls of faceplate. This configuration advantageously prevents hair from entering a faceplate slot and becoming entangled by wrapping around both sides of a support bar.
The faceplate housing has a flange that provides a resting area for the peripheral ledge of the faceplate when the faceplate is attached to the housing. This resting area allows for weaker magnets to be used to keep the faceplate attached to the faceplate housing.
An important feature of the present invention suction filter is the use of an antimicrobial system that is air actuated by depressing a button located on the inside wall or rim of a whirlpool bathtub. When the button is depressed, antimicrobial additives are injected via a tube into the outlet opening of the suction filter. This allows the bather the opportunity to inject a larger amount of antimicrobial additives into the whirlpool bathtub prior to entering the bathtub to give an added safeguard that all bacteria is killed in a whirlpool bath that has not been in operation for an extended period of time. Depressing the button not only injects antimicrobial additives into the outlet of the housing, it disperses the additives. When the tub is filled with water, the injected additives travel first to the pump housing in a high concentration (the pump housing is found to be the place where bacteria growth is the highest) and then throughout the rest of the closed looped piping system, all the while killing bacteria. The greater the period between uses, the more likely a larger amount of bacteria can form in the whirlpool bathtub's piping system. This safeguard ensures that when activated, the whirlpool bathtub will be bacteria-free even if months have passed since the whirlpool bathtub system was operated.
The present suction filter device could be designed in other configurations than its current square-shaped form. The unit could also be designed in a round form or any other shape or size. The filter and filter core could also be made shorter, longer, larger or smaller. The filter could be made smaller for less money to be disposable after each whirlpool bath use. The filter could even be designed in such a way to be incorporated into existing suctions with modification of those suctions. The filter media that filters the water could be pleated or wrapped without pleating around a filter core.
The housing could be designed to incorporate multiple filters. The ridges and slots at the end of the filter core could be made in a variety of shapes or locations to ensure the use of only one filter.
The main body housing could be vacuum formed and become an integral part of the whirlpool bathtub.
The magnets holding the faceplate to the housing could be larger or smaller and arranged in various other locations on each part. The amount of magnets used could be increased or decreased. The faceplate could also be attached using various snap-on configurations. An installation-sealing gasket could be used. The slope in the sidewalls of the housing could be increased or decreased. The overall size of the suction filter could be increased or decreased.
The housing body, faceplate or filter core could be made from other material than injected plastic; it could be stamped or machined out of metal or other material.
The radiating slotted design of the faceplate could have a radiating round hole design.
The safety cavitation hole could be placed anywhere rearward on the outlet of the housing and be various sizes or have multiple openings.
The filter could have various sanitizing materials in its core such as slow dissolving chlorine tablets or other sanitizing material incorporated into the filter core.
The screw nut that attaches the housing to the sidewall of the whirlpool bathtub could have a washer or use locking nuts and have varying sizes and be made out of a variety of materials, including plastic and nylon or some space age material.
Before explaining the disclosed embodiment of the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the particular arrangements shown, since the invention is capable of other embodiments. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
Referring first to FIGS. 1,14,15 a whirlpool bathtub water vessel 1 has a tub 6 with a standard tub wall 6A and a standard tub drain 8. During whirlpool use the pump 3 circulates water via outlet pipe 5, air mixing pipe (not shown) and jets 75. Water is drawn from the filled tub 6 via pump inlet pipe 4 which is connected to the suction filter 2, an alternate embodiment, mounted within the filter housing 31. A switch 12 activates the pump 3. Filter sensing cavitation line 11 and faceplate sensing cavitation line 16 extend from suction filter housing 31. Sidewall 17 is sloped from position y to position X.
When filter sensing line 11 detects a missing filter, the pump 3 cavitates. Likewise, when faceplate sensing line 16 detects a missing or broken faceplate, pump cavitation occurs.
Injector button 14 is depressed to activate the antimicrobial additives dispenser 99 (see
Referring next to
Two lights are shown placed near the inside wall 6A of the whirlpool bathtub near the suction filter 2. However, the lights may be placed anywhere on the tub wall. If the system detects a blockage of the filter 200 (see
The faceplate housing 24 is attached to the inside surface of tub wall 6A by mounting the threaded portion 29A of faceplate housing 24 through gasket 28, wherein the female fittings 25A, 33B on faceplate housing 24 receive the male end 25B, 33A on gasket 28. The housing 24 is secured in placed by nut 29B on the outer surface (back side) of the tub wall 6A via a standard size-opening cut. Support rib 35 extends from faceplate 21 having slots 23 and slidably fits into receiving notch 56 (see
Filter core 2 is attached to filter housing 31 by male ridges 32B which fit into receiving slots 32A on filter core 2 (see
As shown in
The filter core holes and slots (together known as apertures 37) range from small 37A at the outlet end 36B to large 37B at the closed end opposite the outlet end 36B. The larger perforation sizes on the end opposite the outlet end 36B distribute the water flow across the entire length of the filter media 53,54. Without the enlarging feature of the varying apertures, the water would only be filtered by a small portion of the filter media 53,54 near the outlet 36B.
The filter core 2 has an antimicrobial chamber 38 that houses antimicrobial additives such as slow dissolving chlorine, bromine, or a variety of other antimicrobial additives. Antimicrobial chamber 38 has an adjusting bleeder hole opening 85 from which the additive exits into the water that can be increased or decreased by turning the main body of the antimicrobial chamber 38 in one direction or another, wherein the more the antimicrobial chamber is screwed on, the smaller the hole opening 85 becomes. Although the one embodiment antimicrobial chamber has one hole, multiple holes or slots can be used. In addition, the configuration, size, and location of the singular or multiples bleeder holes or slots may vary.
As shown, the alternate embodiment antimicrobial chamber 39A is located furthest from the outlet end 36B. However, it may be configured at any location within filter core 2. Just as one embodiment of the antimicrobial chamber 38 may have multiple bleeder holes or slots of varying configurations, sizes, and locations, the embodiment having alternate chambers may include variations from which additives may exit or bleed from.
Referring next to
As shown in
The end cap embodiments of
In
Likewise, when filter sensing line 11 detects a missing filter, pump cavitation occurs. User U can easily remove the filter assembly by using the end cap pull tab 51 to pull the end cap 50 and filter 200 out, thereby causing pump cavitation. The filter sensing line 11 is connected to the filter cavitation port 18 (see
The antimicrobial agent art is full of examples of agents, including silver (see Patil '916, column 2, line 58), zinc, cadmium, mercury, antimony, gold, aluminum, copper, platinum, and palladium; see U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,632 (2000) to Sawan et al. filed Sep. 11, 1998 and references cited therein.
As user depresses injector button 14 in direction F.sub.d, spring 2002 within pick up housing 2004 compresses in direction Pd. Check ball 2003 reseats and holds antimicrobial liquid 3001 in reservoir 13 and antimicrobial pick up tube 2006 while spring 3002 compresses unseating check ball 3003. Antimicrobial liquid 3001 which was drawn past check ball 2003 as shown in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to disclosed embodiments, numerous modifications and variations can be made and still the result will come within the scope of the invention. No limitation with respect to the specific embodiments disclosed herein is intended or should be inferred.
This non-provisional patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/841,925 entitled Low Water Retention Antimicrobial Whirlpool bathtub filed May 7, 2004, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/211,497 entitled Non-Electrical Sanitation Water Vessel System, filed Aug. 2, 2002, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 6,760,931.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
148288 | Edgar | Mar 1874 | A |
206938 | Emory | Aug 1878 | A |
553383 | Bailey | Jan 1896 | A |
828716 | Craig | Aug 1906 | A |
1284615 | Delely | Nov 1918 | A |
1428618 | Wagner | Sep 1922 | A |
2073784 | Day | Mar 1937 | A |
2194056 | Quagk | May 1940 | A |
2204898 | Lee | Jun 1940 | A |
2247116 | Day | Jun 1941 | A |
2329987 | Goodloe | Sep 1943 | A |
2367794 | Marselus | Jan 1945 | A |
2552709 | Clements | May 1957 | A |
2709489 | Keebler | May 1958 | A |
3027391 | Selri | Mar 1962 | A |
3198726 | Triklis | Aug 1965 | A |
3263811 | Bakes et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3294680 | Lancy | Dec 1966 | A |
3385445 | Bochegger et al. | May 1968 | A |
3422183 | Ellison | Jan 1969 | A |
3426901 | Sherper | Feb 1969 | A |
3575853 | Gaughan | Apr 1971 | A |
3615294 | Long | Oct 1971 | A |
3697567 | Taylor, Jr. | Oct 1972 | A |
3702298 | Solaos Jr. et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3766036 | McKarntey | Oct 1973 | A |
3788982 | Soldos | Jan 1974 | A |
3802910 | Geron | Apr 1974 | A |
3839202 | Roy | Oct 1974 | A |
3857704 | Coulter | Dec 1974 | A |
3873581 | Fitzpatrick | Mar 1975 | A |
3905827 | Goffredo | Sep 1975 | A |
3922224 | Lewandowski | Nov 1975 | A |
3933635 | Marchant | Jan 1976 | A |
3976571 | Rio | Aug 1976 | A |
3989623 | Neal | Nov 1976 | A |
4005011 | Sweeny | Jan 1977 | A |
4026797 | Nikolic | May 1977 | A |
4028236 | Townsend | Jun 1977 | A |
4052318 | Krebs | Oct 1977 | A |
4053403 | Beachgoer et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4078040 | Milkov | Mar 1978 | A |
4094777 | Sugier | Jun 1978 | A |
4108770 | Roy | Aug 1978 | A |
4180473 | Maurer et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4219419 | Sweeny | Aug 1980 | A |
4233694 | Janosko et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4241025 | Grayson et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4257893 | Burton | Mar 1981 | A |
4303441 | Lamisse | Dec 1981 | A |
4309992 | Dodak et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4337136 | Dahlgren | Jun 1982 | A |
4340039 | Hibbard et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4340982 | Hart et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4349434 | Jaworski | Sep 1982 | A |
4359790 | Chalberg | Nov 1982 | A |
4382865 | Sweeny | May 1983 | A |
4385969 | Margolis | May 1983 | A |
4414115 | The | Nov 1983 | A |
4416854 | Nielsen | Nov 1983 | A |
4420463 | Pocius et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4421652 | Heskett | Dec 1983 | A |
4426286 | Puckett et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4504387 | LeMire et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4519914 | Etani | May 1985 | A |
4533476 | Watkins | Aug 1985 | A |
4552658 | Adcock et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4584106 | Held | Apr 1986 | A |
4610783 | Hudson | Sep 1986 | A |
4630634 | Sasaki et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637873 | DeSousa et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4676894 | Diamond et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4692314 | Etani | Sep 1987 | A |
4761208 | Gram et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
8798339 | Perry et al. | Sep 1988 | |
4780197 | Schuman | Oct 1988 | A |
4798028 | Pinion | Jan 1989 | A |
4816177 | Nelson et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817214 | Stuessy | Apr 1989 | A |
4818389 | Tobias et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4857112 | Franninge | Aug 1989 | A |
4867196 | Zetena et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871710 | Denny | Oct 1989 | A |
4876003 | Casberg | Oct 1989 | A |
4880547 | Etani | Nov 1989 | A |
4901926 | Klotzbach | Feb 1990 | A |
4933178 | Capelli | Jun 1990 | A |
4935135 | Schaier | Jun 1990 | A |
4971687 | Anderson | Nov 1990 | A |
4979245 | Gandini | Dec 1990 | A |
5006267 | Vaughn et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011600 | Mowka et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5029594 | Pierce, Jr. | Jul 1991 | A |
5066408 | Powell | Nov 1991 | A |
5076315 | King | Dec 1991 | A |
5122274 | Heskett | Jun 1992 | A |
5149354 | Delaney | Sep 1992 | A |
5167049 | Burkitt, III | Dec 1992 | A |
5198118 | Heskett | Mar 1993 | A |
5202020 | Desjoyaux et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5204004 | Johnston et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5236581 | Perry | Aug 1993 | A |
5238585 | Reed, Sr. | Aug 1993 | A |
5252211 | Searfoss, Jr. | Oct 1993 | A |
5277802 | Goodwin | Jan 1994 | A |
5314623 | Heskett | May 1994 | A |
5328602 | Brooks | Jul 1994 | A |
5332511 | Gay et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5347664 | Hamza et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352369 | Heinig, Jr. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372714 | Logue, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383239 | Mathis et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5392472 | Maxfield | Feb 1995 | A |
5405614 | Ohsuml et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405644 | Ohsumi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409608 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5441529 | Dorsch | Aug 1995 | A |
5441711 | Drewery | Aug 1995 | A |
5507948 | Wargo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525215 | Marchionda | Jun 1996 | A |
5536393 | Weeks | Jul 1996 | A |
5575925 | Logue, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5656159 | Spencer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5681988 | Koch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5743287 | Rauchwerger | Apr 1998 | A |
5755962 | Gershenson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762797 | Patrick et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779913 | Denkewicz, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785845 | Colaiano | Jul 1998 | A |
5810043 | Grenier | Sep 1998 | A |
5810999 | Bachand et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820762 | Bamer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824218 | Gasser et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824243 | Contreras | Oct 1998 | A |
5853581 | Rayborn et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857594 | Ozturk | Jan 1999 | A |
5862545 | Mathis et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868933 | Patrick et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888384 | Wiederhold et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888386 | Enright et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888392 | Frizell | Mar 1999 | A |
5919554 | Watterson, III et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928510 | Meredith | Jul 1999 | A |
5932093 | Chulick | Aug 1999 | A |
5935518 | Richard et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954952 | Strawser, Sr. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980740 | Harms et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980761 | Boissie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6132603 | Briechle | Jan 2000 | A |
6019893 | Denkewicz, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030632 | Sawan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038712 | Chalberg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065161 | Mateina et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066253 | Idland et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086758 | Schilling et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122775 | Jacuzzi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138703 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6153095 | Francisco | Nov 2000 | A |
6162401 | Callaghan | Dec 2000 | A |
6165358 | Denkewicz, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170095 | Zars | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171496 | Patil | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182681 | Robertson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190547 | King et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199224 | Versland | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214217 | Sliger, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238575 | Patil | May 2001 | B1 |
6269493 | Sorensen | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6270662 | Gibson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274036 | Ellis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279177 | Gloodt | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280617 | Brandreth, III | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282370 | Cline et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283308 | Patil et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287466 | Yassin | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289530 | Miller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294095 | Lewis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298871 | Pickens et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308350 | Marchionda | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317903 | Brunelle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328900 | King | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331432 | Bautista et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340341 | Purcell | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340431 | Khan | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6342841 | Stingl | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357060 | Gloodt | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6358405 | Leahy | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358425 | King | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6390340 | Lynch, Sr. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391167 | Grannersberger | May 2002 | B1 |
6395167 | Mattson, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405387 | Barnes | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409864 | Choi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419839 | Cox et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419840 | Meincke | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444129 | Collins | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460894 | Weh et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471856 | Keith | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497822 | Blanchette et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500332 | Martin et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6511605 | Connelly, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517727 | Pickens et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523192 | Gloodt | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540916 | Patil | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544415 | King | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558538 | Scuilla et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562242 | King et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6592341 | Olney | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592766 | King | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594400 | Kim | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6623634 | Whitehurst | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630106 | Levy | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641787 | Siggins et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651825 | Turner, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666974 | Page | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676842 | Scuilla et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688490 | Carlson | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722384 | Gates | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749746 | Mokrzycki | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760931 | Mattson et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6792925 | Dworatzek et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797028 | Duffy | Sep 2004 | B2 |
20030113378 | Laridon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
20010003217 | Sorensen | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010013373 | Wright | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027573 | Gloodt | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020113025 | Gauldin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117432 | Lincke | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030029289 | Patil | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030029789 | Patil | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030150796 | Heinig, Jr. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030178374 | Arsta | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030213059 | Mattson, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040025249 | Desmond | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040168249 | Mattson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040168962 | Mattson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188346 | Clive et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 61049 | Jun 2001 | DE |
19961049 | Jun 2001 | DE |
04-214150 | Aug 1992 | JP |
4-214150 | Aug 1992 | JP |
07-080218 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7-80218 | Mar 1995 | JP |
10-192847 | Jul 1998 | JP |
11-267414 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-267614 | Oct 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050183199 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10211497 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10841925 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10841925 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 11114844 | US |