Antimitotic Rhizoxin Deritivatives of Burkholderia Rhizoxina, Method for Producing Said Derivatives and Use Thereof

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20090233976
  • Publication Number
    20090233976
  • Date Filed
    September 25, 2006
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    September 17, 2009
    14 years ago
Abstract
The invention concerns four novel secondary metabolites of the Burkholderia rhizoxina endosymbiont, a method for isolating said compounds from cultures of the bacteria and the use of said substances.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention concerns four novel secondary metabolites of the Burkholderia rhizoxina endosymbiont, a method for isolating said compounds from cultures of the bacteria and the use of said substances.


Apart from cardiovascular diseases, malign tumors are the second commonest cause of death in Germany (DKFZ, 2000).


Despite intensive research in the last years, the treatment of some types of cancer is still a great challenge.


Rhizoxin is a macrocyclic polyketide with an antimitotic effect that has been isolated from fungi of the Rhizopus genus (Iwasaki, S. et al. J. Antibiot., 1984, 37, 354-362): It has a high activity against a number of human cancer cell lines, particularly against vincristin-resistent cells, too, and therefore it has become the focus of interest as a potential chemotherapeutic drug. Its effect is based on a bonding to beta-tubulin eukaryotic cells that inhibits the assembling of microtubuli. Recently, we could show that rhizoxin is not formed by Rhizopus but by endosymbionts of the fungus (L. Partida-Martinez and C. Hertweck, Nature, 2005, 437, 884-888). By cultivating the endosymbiont the production of rhizoxin and of derivatives thereof could be considerably increased.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is the object of the present invention to make novel, antimitotic rhizoxin derivatives available and to provide a method for their production. Moreover, the use of said substances is described.


According to the invention, the following antimiotic rhizoxin derivatives are provided:












DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The production of the substances according to the formulas is carried out by the cultivation of the endosymbiotic bacteria strain Burkholderia rhizoxina, the subsequent extraction of the culture and the isolation of the compounds by means of chromatographic methods.


For this purpose, Burkholderia rhizoxina DSM 17360 is cultivated as a shaking culture on a liquid medium and then the grown culture is extracted with organic solvents.


Afterwards, the extract is fractioned via size exclusion chromatography on dextrangels (Sephadex LH-20). The final purification of the substances is performed by means of preparative HPLC by using an RP-18 phase and acetonitril/water-mixtures in the gradient mode.


The structure of the compounds 1-4 is made clear by IR spectroscopy, high-resolution mass spectrometry, and 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy.


The inventive substances 1-4 show very strong antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects (e.g. for L-929 mouse fibroblast, K-562 human leukemia cells and HeLa human cervix carcinoma line) and an antifungal activity (e.g. against Glomerella cingulata, Penicillium notatum, Fusarium culmorum, Hamigera avellanea, Aspergillus fumigatus). (See Table 1.)


Due to their antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties, the substances 1-4 are very well suited as chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of cancer diseases.


Furthermore, the good antifungal effect of the substances 1-4 allows to use them in the therapy of mycoses.


The compounds (1-4) as such can be used in substance or as a pharmaceutical preparation in combination with common additives.


Exemplary Embodiments


Burkholderia rhizoxina DSM 17360 is cultivated as a shaking culture by means of fermentation on a liquid medium (composition: cornstarch 1%, glycerin 0.5%, yeast extract 1%, corn steep water 1%, CaCO3 1%) at 30° C. (4 d). The complete grown culture is extracted with ethyl acetate via stirring and afterwards filtered. This procedure is repeated twice. The combined extracts are dried over sodium sulphate and concentrated. The extract obtained is dissolved in methanol and fractioned via size exclusion chromatography on Sephadex LH-20. The substances 1 through 4 are isolated via preparative HPLC by using an RP-18 phase and acetonitril/water-mixtures (method: MeCN/H2O 25:75 5 min, then to MeCN/H2O 80:20 during 35 min, then to MeCN 100% during 5 min, detection at 311 nm).


Substance 1:

White powder. IR (ATR, solid film) vmax/cm−1 2980, 2926, 2886, 1704, 1654, 1577, 1483, 1380, 1275, 1202, 1153, 1105, 1046, 963, 865, 827, 780, 746, 701. 1H NMR (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) in d-methanol [see Table 2]. (+)-ESI-MS m/z 614 [M+H]+, m/z 636 [M+Na]+. HRESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+=636.3143 (calculated for C34H47NO9Na 636.3143)


Substance 2:

White powder. IR (ATR, solid substance) vmax/cm−1 2977, 2935, 2924, 1705, 1652, 1577, 1437, 1377, 1260, 1202, 1152, 1105, 1048, 1007, 966, 863, 827, 780, 748, 702. 1H NMR (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) in d-chloroform [see Table 2]. (+)-ESI-MS m/z 628 [M+H]+, m/z 650 [M+Na]+. HRESI-MS: m/z [M+H]+=628.3478 (calculated for C35H50NO9 628.3486)


Substance 3:

White powder. IR (ATR, solid substance) vmax/cm−1 2960, 2938, 2928, 1710, 1654, 1577, 1437, 1367, 1275, 1199, 1151, 1108, 1084, 1048, 1008, 971, 862, 827, 753, 706. 1H NMR (300 MHZ) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) in d-chloroform [see Table 2]. (+)-ESI-MS m/z 642 [M+H]+, m/z 664 [M+Na]+. HRESI-MS: m/z [M+H]+=642.3612 (calculated for C36H52NO9 642.3637)


Substance 4:

White powder. IR (ATR, solid substance) vmax/cm−1 1H NMR (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) in d-methanol [see Table 2]. (+)-ESI-MS m/z 642 [M+H]+, m/z 664 [M+Na]+. HRESI-MS: m/z [M+Na]+=664.3434 (calculated for C36H51NO9Na 664.3456)














TABLE 1








L-929
K-562
HeLa




GI50
GI50
CC50



Substance
[μg/ml]
[μg/ml]
[μg/ml]









1

1.5 × 10−2
9 × 10−2



2
5 × 10−2
 3 × 10−5
2.8 × 10−4  



3
5 × 10−2
<3 × 10−5
<3 × 10−5



4
1.2 × 10−2  
<3 × 10−5

2 × 10−53











The examination of the antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties of the substances 1-4 has been performed via the method described in the literature (H. M. Dahse, B. Schlegel, U. Gräfe, Pharmazie 2001, 56, 489-491). The antifungal activity has been determined via the agar diffusion test. (See Table 2.)

















TABLE 2












4




1
1
2
2
3
3
δH (J
4


position
δH (J [Hz])
δC
δH (J [Hz])
δC
δH (J [Hz])
δC
[Hz])
δC























 1

167.0

165.7

165.1

166.9


 2
5.78 d (15.6)
126.2
5.70 d (15.6)
124.6
5.67 d (15.6)
124.9
5.77 d (15.6)
126.2


 3
6.79 ddd (15.5, 8.1,
147.7
6.78 ddd (15.5, 9.0,
147.1
6.74 ddd (15.5, 9.0,
146.4
6.78 ddd (15.6, 8.2,
147.6



7.5)

6.5)

6.6)

7.6)


 4
2.50 m*
36.8
2.40 m
37.7
2.39 m*
37.5
2.47 m
36.8



2.15 m

2.06 m*

2.06 m

2.13 m


 5
2.24 m
32.8
2.21 m
32.2
2.21 m
32.1
2.28 m
33.0


 5a
2.50 dd*
41.3
2.52 dd (15.8, 6.9)
40.5
2.51 dd (15.8, 6.8)
40.4
2.52 dd (15.2, 5.6)
41.2



2.35 dd

2.35 d (6.9)

2.34 dd (15.7, 6.9)*

2.36 dd (15.2, 8.2)


 5b

176.6

173.5

173.5

174.8


 6
1.75 m
39.2
1.75 dd (14.5, 5.9)
37.9
1.71 m
37.8
1.71 m
39.1



1.10 m

1.09 m

1.09 m

1.05 m


 7
3.13 m
73.9
3.20 m
74.3
3.16 m
74.2
3.11 m
73.9


 8
2.02 m
46.8
2.03 m*
45.5
2.02 m
45.5
2.00 m*
46.8


 8a
1.02 d (6.0)*
17.7
1.03 d (6.65)
17.0
1.02 d (6.6)
17.0
1.02 d (6.7)
17.7


 9
5.45 dd (15.6;
142.3
5.51 dd (15.6; 9.4)
141.6
5.48 dd (15.6;
141.4
5.43 dd (15.6; 9.3)
142.3



9.2)



9.4)


10
5.16 dd (15.7;
127.3
5.14 dd (15.6; 8.4)
125.4
5.12 dd (15.6;
125.6
15.16 dd (15.6; 8.2)
127.3



8.1)



8.5)


11
3.00 (8.2)
63.4
3.16 d (8.5)
64.2
3.11 d (8.3)
63.9
3.00 d (8.3)
63.3


12

66.3

65.6

65.6

66.2


12a
1.29 s
11.2
1.33 s
11.1
1.31 s
11.1
1.29 s
11.2


13
2.96 dd (11.0;
79.5
3.09 dd (10.2, 3.6)
78.2
3.00 dd (10.8,
78.3
2.94 dd (11.0; 2.6)
79.5



2.7)



2.8)


14
2.03 m*
34.0
1.95 m*
33.1
1.94 m
31.8
1.95 m*
34.0



1.80 m

1.89 m

1.78 m

1.76 m


15
4.76 m
75.3
4.85 m
74.1
4.76 dd (9.9,
73.3
4.75 dd (9.7; 3.5)
74.9







3.6)


16
2.05 m
41.4
1.98 m*
40.3
2.09 m
39.4
2.06 m
40.6


16a
0.99 d (6.5)*
10.3
0.94 d (6.8)
9.6
0.97 d (6.8)
10.2
1.00 d (6.8)
10.6


17
3.80 d (8.6)
80.7
3.88 d (6.0)
77.2
3.21 d (8.6)
89.2
3.33 d (8.9)
90.8


17-




3.13 s
56.2
3.17 s
56.5


OCH3


18

140.7

138.2

136.3

138.


18a
1.89 s
12.0
1.83 s
12.9
1.82 s
11.6
1.84 s
11.7


19
6.14 d (10.9)
128.4
6.17 d (10.8)
126.6
6.06 d (10.8)
129.2
6.22 d (10.9)
131.3


20
6.65 dd (15.1;
125.9
6.54 dd (15.1, 10.7)
124.3
6.57 dd (15.1,
124.1
6.71 dd (15.5;
127.4



10.8)



10.7)

11.0)


21
6.40 d (15.2)
138.3
6.35 d (15.2)
137.6
6.34 d (15.2)
137.6
7.27 d (15.3)
132.8


22

139.0

136.9

136.9

137.2


22a
2.09 s
14.7
2.11 s
14.4
2.12 s
14.3
2.04 s
21.0


23
6.21 s
120.9
6.22 s
120.5
6.23 s
120.7
5.78 s
118.8


24

139.5

138.8

138.7

139.1


25
7.79 s
137.7
7.50 s
135.9
7.50 s
135.9
7.74 s
138.


26

162.9

160.9

160.9

163.2


26a
2.43 s
13.4
2.43 s
13.8
2.43 s
13.8
2.43 s
13.5


27


3.68 s
51.7
3.67 s
51.7
3.67 s
52.0





*Partial overlapping of signals





Claims
  • 1. A compound of one of the following formulas:
  • 2. A method for producing a compound according to claim 1, comprising cultivating an endosymbiont on a liquid culture medium to produce a culture solution and isolating the compound from the culture solution.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the endosymbiont is Burkholderia rhizoxina.
  • 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the endosymbiont is Burkholderia rhizoxina DSM 17360.
  • 5. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound according to claim 1.
  • 6. (canceled)
  • 7. (canceled)
  • 8. (canceled)
  • 9. A method of treating cancer in a person, comprising administering to the person a pharmaceutical composition according to claim 5.
  • 10. A method of treating mycosis in a person, comprising administering to the person a pharmaceutical composition according to claim 5.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2005 048 556.1 Oct 2005 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/DE2006/001708 9/25/2006 WO 00 4/25/2008