Patent Application
20070265214
This invention relates to antisense oligomers for use in treating a picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus or flavivirus infection, antiviral treatment methods employing the oligomers, and methods for monitoring binding of antisense oligomers to a viral genome target site.
Agrawal, S. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87(4):1401-5 (1990).
Alt, M. et al., Hepatology 22(3):707-17 (1995).
Alvarez-Salas, L. et al., Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 9:441-450 (1999).
Aurelian, L. et al., Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 10:77-85 (2000).
Bloomers, M., Nuc Acids Res, 22(20):4187 (1994).
Bonham, M. A. et al, Nucleic Acids Res. 23(7):1197-1203 (1995).
Boudvillain, M. et al, Biochemistry 36(10):2925-31 (1997).
Clarke, G. E., and Lambden, P., J. Infect. Dis. 181, S309-316 (2000).
Cottral, G. E., in: Manual of Standard Methods for Veterinary Microbiology, Eds., Cornell University Press, Ithica, N.Y. pp. 60-93.
Cross, V. et al, Biochem 36:4096 (1997).
Dagle et al, Nuc Acids Res. 28(10):2153 (2000).
Ding, D. et al, Nuc Acids Res. 24(2):354 (1996).
Felgner et al, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7413 (1987).
Gait, M. J.; et al, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin I, 1684-1686 (1974).
Gee, J. E. et al, Antisense & Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 8:103-111 (1998).
Green, K. et al, J. Am. Coll. Surg. 191:93-105 (2000).
Gutierrez, A. et al, Antiviral Research 22(1):1-13 (1993).
Hanecak, R. et al, Journal of Virology 70(8): 5203-12 (1996).
Holland, J. in: Emerging Virus, Morse, S. S., Ed., Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford pp. 203-218 (1993).
Kusunoki, A. et al., Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 19:1709-1719 (2000).
Lesnikowski, Z. J. et al., Nucleic Acids Research 18(8):2109-15 (Apr. 25, 1990).
Matteucci, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 31:2385-2388 (1990).
McElroy, E. B. et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 4:1071 (1994).
Mertes, M. P. et al., J. Med. Chem. 12:154-157 (1969).
Miller, P. S. et al., in: Antisense Research Applications, Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., Eds., Boca Raton, CRC Press pp. 189 (1993).
Mizuta, T. et al., Nature Biotechnology 17:583-587 (1999).
Mohan, V. et al., Tetrahedron 51:8655 (1995).
Murray, R. et al., in: Medical Microbiology (Third Edition) St. Louis, Mo., Mosby Press pp. 542-543 (1998).
O'Ryan, M. et al., in: Spector S, Lancz G, Eds., Clinical Virology Manual, New York, Elsevier Science pp. 361-196 (1992).
Robbins, I. et al., Methods in Enzymology 313:189-203 (1999).
Roughton, A. L. et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:7249 (1995).
Smith, A. et al., Emerg. Inf. Dis. 4:13-20 (1998a).
Smith A. et al., Clin. Inf. Dis. 26:43-40 (1998b).
Stein, C. et al., Pharmacol & Therapeutics, 85:231 (2000).
Toulme, J. J. et al., Biochimie 78(7):663-73 (1996).
Vasseur, J. J. et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114:4006 (1992).
Wei, X. et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 28:3065-3074 (2000).
Wu, G. et al., J. Biol. Chem. 267:12436-12439 (1992).
Xu, W., Revue Scientifique et Technique, Office of International des Epizooties 10:2393-2408 (1991).
RNA viruses cause many diseases in wildlife, domestic animals and humans. These viruses are genetically and antigenically diverse, exhibiting broad tissue tropisms and a wide pathogenic potential. The incubation periods of some of the most pathogenic viruses, e.g. the caliciviruses, are very short. Viral replication and expression of virulence factors may overwhelm early defense mechanisms (Xu, 1991) and cause acute and severe symptoms.
There are no specific treatment regimes for many viral infections. The infection may be serotype specific and natural immunity is often brief or absent (Murray et al., 1998). Immunization against these virulent viruses is impractical because of the diverse serotypes. RNA virus replicative processes lack effective genetic repair mechanisms, and current estimates of RNA virus replicative error rates are such that each genomic replication can be expected to produce one to ten errors, thus generating a high number of variants (Hollan, 1993). Often, the serotypes show no cross protection, such that infection with any one serotype does not protect against infection with another. For example, vaccines against the vesivirus genus of the caliciviruses would have to provide protection against over 40 different neutralizing serotypes (Smith et al., 1998a), and vaccines for the other genera of the Caliciviridae are expected to have the same limitations.
Antisense agents have been proposed for treating various types of viral infection. In general, the specific proposals to date can be classified according to the type of virus targeted, the viral-genome target, and the type of oligonucleotide backbone employed in the antisense compound. Among the viruses that have been targeted are vesicular stomatitis virus (Robbins and Lebleu, 1999), influenza virus (Mizuta et al., 1999), hepatitis B virus (Wu and Wu, 1992), human papilloma virus (Alvarez-Salas et al, 1999), herpes simplex virus (Aurelian and Smith, 2000), HIV (Kusunoki et al., Wei et al, 2000) and foot-and-mouth disease virus (Gutierrez et al, 1993). Viral genome targets that have been proposed include the IE-2 gene of cytomegalovirus (Green et al, 2000), a stem-loop structure at the 5′ non-coding region, the translation initiation codon, a core protein coding sequence of the hepatitis C virus, and the second functional initiator AUG of the foot-and-mouth disease virus (Hanecak et al, 1996; Alt et al, 1995; Gutierrez et al, 1993). Finally, a wide variety of antisense backbone structures have been proposed, including the negatively charged phosphorothioate (PSO) backbone oligomers, particularly the phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides (Hanecak et al, 1996; Alt et al, 1995; Gutierrez et al, 1993) and uniformly modified 2′-methoxyethoxy phosphodiester oligonucleotide (Hanecak et al, 1996).
Discovery and development generally involves demonstration of antiviral activity in cell culture. A compilation of antiviral experiments in cell culture is provided in Table 1 below.
Clinical trials have been initiated for antisense therapeutics targeting HIV, HPV, CMV and HCV (Table 2 below), all using phosphorothioate-linked oligonucleotides. As seen, the clinical trial experience to date indicates some failures, although antisense against CMV infection (ISIS2922) has been approved by the FDA, making this the only antisense agent approved by the FDA to date.
The initial optimism towards antisense approaches to effective antiviral therapeutics has been blunted. Many of the effective antisense strategies employed in cell culture models (e.g. those in Table 1) have not successfully proceeded to clinical trials. The slow progress is due in part to the lack of robust cell culture models. For example, the HIV isolates that infect cultured cells do not generally reflect those found in the infected population, and the cell culture models do not integrate the roles of the multiple cell types infected. This problem is compounded by the lack of appropriate pre-clinical animal models for the full exploitation of viral gene expression and replication in vivo. Again, in the case of HIV, the human virus either does not infect animals, or, when primates are infected, they do not develop pathology similar to that seen in humans. The risk in developing antisense antiviral agents without robust culture models and appropriate animal models is great.
Thus, there remains a need for an effective antiviral therapy in several virus families, including small, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses in the picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus and flavivirus families. To meet this need, an antisense agent must be substantially stable against nuclease degradation, able to be taken up readily by virus-infected host cells following compound administration, and targeted against an effective region of the viral genome, that is, able to shut down viral replication.
In one aspect, the invention provides an antiviral compound directed against an RNA virus from the picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus or flavivirus families having a single-stranded, positive sense genome of less than 12 kb and a first open reading frame that encodes a polyprotein containing multiple functional proteins. The antiviral compound comprises an oligomer or oligonucleotide compound having a sequence of 12 to 40 morpholino subunits (a) with a targeting base sequence that is substantially complementary to a viral target sequence of at least 12 bases that spans the translation initiation region of said virus first open reading frame, and (b) that are linked by uncharged phosphorodiamidate linkages interspersed with at least two and up to half positively charged phosphorodiamidate linkages. In a preferred embodiment, the uncharged, phosphorus-containing intersubunit linkages are represented by the structure:
where Y1=O, Z=O, Pj is a purine or pyrimidine base-pairing moiety effective to bind, by base-specific hydrogen bonding, to a base in a polynucleotide (where base-pairing moieties on different subunits may be the same or different), X is alkyl, alkoxy, thioalkoxy, or alkyl amino of the form NR2, where each R is independently hydrogen or methyl, and the positively charged linkages are represented by the same structure, but where X is 1-piperazino.
The compound may be a covalent conjugate of an oligonucleotide analog moiety capable of forming such a heteroduplex structure with the positive or negative sense strand of the virus, and an arginine-rich polypeptide effective to enhance the uptake of the compound into host cells. Exemplary arginine-rich polypeptides have one of the sequences identified by SEQ ID NOS: 41-43.
The oligomer will typically have a Tm, with respect to binding to the viral target sequence, of greater than about 50° C., as well as an ability to be actively taken up by mammalian cells. In addition, the compound can generally be recovered, in a heteroduplex form consisting of the oligomer and a complementary portion of the viral genome of the RNA virus, from the serum or urine of a mammalian subject, several hours after being administered to the subject.
In various embodiments, the antiviral compounds are directed against specific viruses or families. For example, selected embodiments include antiviral compounds directed against a picornavirus. Exemplary compounds include those having a targeting sequence having at least 90% homology to a sequence selected from the group consisting of:
Other embodiments include antiviral compounds directed against a calicivirus. Exemplary compounds include those having a targeting sequence having at least 90% homology to a sequence selected from the group consisting of:
Other embodiments include antiviral compounds directed against a togavirus. For use in inhibition of hepatitis E virus, the compound comprises an oligomer having a targeting sequence having at least 90% homology to a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 33 and 34. Still other embodiments include antiviral compounds directed against a togavirus. For use in inhibition of a hepatitis C flavivirus, the compound comprises an oligomer having a targeting sequence that is complementary to a sequence of at least 12 contiguous bases of the HCV AUG start-site region identified by SEQ ID NO: 37. Exemplary targeting sequences include those having at least 90% homology to SEQ ID NO.35, and 38-40.
In more specific embodiments, the compounds have the exact targeting sequences shown, and/or comprise phosphorodiamidate-linked morpholino oligomers. For example, compounds directed against the serotype Pan-1 vesivirus may comprise a phosphorodiamidate-linked morpholino oligomer (PMO) having a targeting sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 27, 28, and 29. A compound directed against the feline vesivirus may comprise a PMO having the targeting sequence SEQ ID NO. 31.
In a related aspect, the invention provides a method of inhibiting replication of an RNA virus from the picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus or flavivirus families, having a single-stranded, positive sense genome of less than 12 kb, and a first open reading frame that encodes a polyprotein containing multiple functional proteins. The method comprises exposing the virus, or, typically, a cell infected with the virus, to a substantially uncharged morpholino oligomer having (a) a sequence of 12 to 40 subunits, supporting a targeting base sequence that is substantially complementary to a viral target sequence which spans the translation initiation region of the first open reading frame, and (b) a substantially uncharged backbone. In one embodiment of the method, the oligomer is administered to a mammalian subject infected with the virus. Preferred embodiments of the antisense compounds, with respect to properties and structure, are as described above.
In a further aspect, the invention provides a method of confirming the presence of an effective interaction between a picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus or flavivirus infecting a mammalian subject, and a antisense oligomer targeted against the infecting virus. The method comprises:
This method can be used in determining the effectiveness of treating a picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus or flavivirus infection by administering the oligomer, by carrying out the described steps of administering, obtaining a sample, and assaying for heteroduplex at periodic intervals throughout a treatment period.
In addition, the method can be used in determining the identity of an infecting picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus or flavivirus. The family or genus of such a virus can be determined by:
For identification of a specific infecting picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus or flavivirus, the following further steps can be carried out:
These and other objects and features of the invention will be more fully appreciated when the following detailed description of the invention is read in conjunction with the accompanying figures
I. Definitions
The terms below, as used herein, have the following meanings, unless indicated otherwise:
The term “open reading frame” or “ORF” refers to a nucleotide sequence that includes a single 5′ initiation codon, encodes one or more individual proteins, and terminates at a termination codon.
The terms “polynucleotide”, “oligonucleotide”, and “oligomer” are used interchangeably and refer to a polymeric molecule having a backbone which supports bases capable of hydrogen bonding to typical polynucleotides, where the polymer backbone presents the bases in a manner to permit such hydrogen bonding in a sequence specific fashion between the polymeric molecule and a typical polynucleotide (e.g., single-stranded RNA, double-stranded RNA, single-stranded DNA or double-stranded DNA). “Polynucleotides” include polymers with nucleotides which are an N- or C-glycoside of a purine or pyriridine base, and polymers containing non-standard nucleotide backbones, for example, backbones formed using phosphorodiamidate morpholino chemistry, polyamide linkages (e.g., peptide nucleic acids or PNAs) and other synthetic sequence-specific nucleic acid molecules.
A first sequence is an “antisense sequence” with respect to a second sequence if a polynucleotide with a first sequence specifically binds to, or specifically hybridizes with, a polynucleotide which has a second sequence, under physiological conditions.
The terms “antisense oligonucleotide” and “antisense oligomer” refer to a sequence of subunits bearing nucleotide base-pairing moieties, linked by a subunit-to-subunit backbone, that is effective to hybridize to a target sequence of a viral, positive-sense ssRNA. Typically, such an oligomer is from 8 to about 40 nucleotide subunits long, more typically about 12 to 40 nucleotide subunits long, and preferably about 12 to 30, or 12 to 25, subunits in length. The oligomer may have exact sequence complementarity to the target sequence or near complementarity, as defined below. Such an antisense oligomer may block or inhibit the translation of a polyprotein encoded by the target open reading frame (ORF).
A phosphorus containing backbone in an oligonucleotide compound is one in which a majority of the subunit linkages, e.g., between 50-90%, are uncharged at physiological pH, and contain a single phosphorous atom, and at least two and up to half of the linkages have a positive charge at physiological pH. The compound of the invention contains between 8 and 40 subunits, typically about 8-25 subunits, and preferably about 12 to 25 subunits. The compound may have exact sequence complementarity to the target sequence or near complementarity, as defined below.
A “subunit” of an oligonucleotide or oligonucleotide analog refers to one nucleotide (or nucleotide analog) unit of the oligomer. The term may refer to the nucleotide unit with or without the attached intersubunit linkage, although, when referring to a “charged subunit”, the charge typically resides within the intersubunit linkage (e.g. a phosphate or phosphorothioate linkage).
A “morpholino oligomer” is an oligonucleotide analog composed of morpholino subunit structures of the form shown in FIGS. 1A-E, where (i) the structures are linked together by phosphorus-containing linkages, one to three atoms long, joining the morpholino nitrogen of one subunit to the 5′ exocyclic carbon of an adjacent subunit, and (ii) Pi and Pj are purine or pyrimidine base-pairing moieties effective to bind, by base-specific hydrogen bonding, to a base in a polynucleotide. The purine or pyrimidine base-pairing moiety is typically adenine, cytosine, guanine, uracil or thymine. The synthesis, structures, and binding characteristics of morpholino oligomers are detailed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,698,685, 5,217,866, 5,142,047, 5,034,506, 5,166,315, 5,521,063, and 5,506,337, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The subunit and linkage shown in
A preferred morpholino oligomer is a phosphorodiamidate-linked morpholino oligomer, referred to herein as a PMO, and includes uncharged phosphorodiamidate linkages interspersed with positively charged phosphorodiamidate linkages. Such oligomers are composed of morpholino subunit structures such as shown in
The term “substituted”, particularly with respect to an alkyl, alkoxy, thioalkoxy, or alkylamino group, refers to replacement of a hydrogen atom on carbon with a heteroatom-containing substituent, such as, for example, halogen, hydroxy, alkoxy, thiol, alkylthio, amino, alkylamino, imino, oxo (keto), nitro, cyano, or various acids or esters such as carboxylic, sulfonic, or phosphonic. It may also refer to replacement of a hydrogen atom on a heteroatom (such as an amine hydrogen) with an alkyl, carbonyl or other carbon containing group.
Polynucleotides are described as “complementary” to one another when hybridization occurs in an antiparallel configuration between two single-stranded polynucleotides. A double-stranded polynucleotide can be “complementary” to another polynucleotide, if hybridization can occur between one of the strands of the first polynucleotide and the second. Complementarity (the degree that one polynucleotide is complementary with another) is quantifiable in terms of the proportion (i.e., the percentage) of bases in opposing strands that are expected to form hydrogen bonds with each other, according to generally accepted base-pairing rules. An antisense oligomer may have “near” or “substantial” complementarity to the target sequence and still functional for the purpose of the present invention. Preferably, the antisense oligomers employed have at most one mismatch with the target sequence out of 10 nucleotides, and preferably at most one mismatch out of 20, when compared to the exemplary oligomers having SEQ ID NOs: 16-35 as designated herein. Alternatively, the antisense oligomers employed have at least 90% sequence homology, and preferably at least 95% sequence homology, with the exemplary oligomers having SEQ ID NOs: 16-35 as designated herein.
An oligonucleotide or antisense oligomer “specifically hybridizes” to a target polynucleotide if the oligomer hybridizes to the target under physiological conditions, with a Tm substantially greater than 37° C., preferably at least 50° C., and typically 60° C.-80° C. or higher. Such hybridization preferably corresponds to stringent hybridization conditions. At a given ionic strength and pH, the Tm is the temperature at which 50% of a target sequence hybridizes to a complementary polynucleotide. Again, such hybridization may occur with “near” or “substantial” complementary of the antisense oligomer to the target sequence, as well as with exact complementarity.
A “nuclease-resistant” oligomeric molecule (oligomer) refers to one whose backbone is substantially resistant to nuclease cleavage, in non-hybridized or hybridized form; by common extracellular and intracellular nucleases in the body; that is, the oligomer shows little or no nuclease cleavage under normal nuclease conditions in the body to which the oligomer is exposed.
A “heteroduplex” refers to a duplex between an antisense oligomer and the complimentary portion of a target RNA. A “nuclease-resistant heteroduplex” refers to a heteroduplex formed by the binding of an antisense oligomer to its complementary target, such that the heteroduplex is substantially resistant to in vivo degradation by intracellular and extracellular nucleases, such as RNAseH, which are capable of cutting double-stranded RNA/RNA or RNA/DNA complexes.
As used herein, the term “target”, relative to the viral genomic RNA or an mRNA, refers to an mRNA or viral genomic RNA which is expressed or present in single-stranded in one or more types of mammalian cells.
A “base-specific intracellular binding event involving a target RNA” refers to the specific binding of an oligomer to a target RNA sequence inside a cell. The base specificity of such binding is sequence specific. For example, a single-stranded polynucleotide can specifically bind to a single-stranded polynucleotide that is complementary in sequence.
An “antisense oligomer composition” refers to a composition comprising one or more antisense oligomers for use in the RNA detection methods of the present invention. In some cases, such an “antisense oligomer composition” contains a plurality of antisense oligomers.
An “effective amount” of an antisense oligomer, targeted against an infecting ssRNA virus, is an amount effective to reduce the rate of replication of the infecting virus, and/or viral load, and/or symptoms associated with the viral infection.
As used herein, the term “body fluid” encompasses a variety of sample types obtained from a subject including, urine, saliva, plasma, blood, spinal fluid, or other sample of biological origin, such as skin cells or dermal debris, and may refer to cells or cell fragments suspended therein, or the liquid medium and its solutes.
The term “relative amount” is used where a comparison is made between a test measurement and a control measurement. The relative amount of a reagent forming a complex in a reaction is the amount reacting with a test specimen, compared with the amount reacting with a control specimen. The control specimen may be run separately in the same assay, or it may be part of the same sample (for example, normal tissue surrounding a malignant area in a tissue section).
“Treatment” of an individual or a cell is any type of intervention provided as a means to alter the natural course of the individual or cell. Treatment includes, but is not limited to, administration of e.g., a pharmaceutical composition, and may be performed either prophylactically, or subsequent to the initiation of a pathologic event or contact with an etiologic agent. The related term “improved therapeutic outcome” relative to a patient diagnosed as infected with a particular virus, refers to a slowing or diminution in the growth of virus, or viral load, or detectable symptoms associated with infection by that particular virus.
An agent is “actively taken up by mammalian cells” when the agent can enter the cell by a mechanism other than passive diffusion across the cell membrane. The agent may be transported, for example, by “active transport”, referring to transport of agents across a mammalian cell membrane by e.g. an ATP-dependent transport mechanism, or by “facilitated transport”, referring to transport of antisense agents across the cell membrane by a transport mechanism that requires binding of the agent to a transport protein, which then facilitates passage of the bound agent across the membrane. For both active and facilitated transport, the antisense agent preferably has a substantially uncharged backbone, as defined below. Alternatively, the antisense compound may be formulated in a complexed form, such as an agent having an anionic backbone complexed with cationic lipids or liposomes, which can be taken into cells by an endocytotic mechanism.
II. Targeted Viruses
The present invention is based on the discovery that effective inhibition of certain classes of small, single-stranded, positive sense RNA viruses can be achieved by exposing cells infected with the virus to antisense compounds (i) targeted against the initiation region of the viral first open reading frame (ORF1) and (ii) having physical and pharmacokinetic features which allow effective interaction between the antisense compound and the virus within host cells. In one aspect, the oligomers can be used in treating a mammalian subject infected with the virus.
The invention targets RNA viruses having genomes that are: (i) single stranded, (ii) positive polarity, (iii) less than 12 kb, and (iv) encoding a polyprotein at the first open reading frame (ORF1). In particular, targeted viral families include picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus, and flavivirus. Various physical, morphological, and biological characteristics of each of these four families, and members therein, can be found, for example, in Textbook of Human Virology, R. Belshe, ed., 2nd Edition, Mosby, 1991. Some of the key biological characteristics of each family are summarized below.
A. Picornavirus. The picornaviruses, which infect both humans and animals, can cause severe paralysis (paralytic poliomyelitis), aspectic meningitis, hepatitis, pleurodynia, myocarditis, skin rashes, and colds; inapparent infection is common. Several medically important members include the poliovirus, hepatitis A virus, rhinovirus, Aphthovirus (foot-and mouth disease virus), and the coxsackie virus.
Rhinoviruses are recognized as the cause of the common cold in humans. Serotypes are designated from 1A to 100. Transmission is primarily by the aerosol route and the virus replicates in the nose.
Like all positive sense RNA viruses, the genomic RNA of Picornaviruses is infectious; that is, the genomic RNA is able to direct the synthesis of viral proteins directly, without host transcription events.
B. Calicivirus. The caliciviruses infect both humans and animals. The genus vesivirus produces disease manifestations in mammals that include epithelial blistering and are suspected of being the cause of animal abortion storms and human hepatitis (non A through E) (Smith et al., 1998a and 1998 b). Other genera of the calicivirus include the Norwalk-like and Sapporo-like viruses, which together comprise the human calicivirus, and the lagoviruses, which cause hemorrhagic diseases in rabbits, a particularly rapid and deadly virus.
The human caliciviruses are the most common cause of viral diarrhea outbreaks worldwide in adults, as well as being significant pathogens of infants (O'Ryan et al., 1992). There are at least five types of human caliciviruses that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract. The Norwalk virus is a widespread human agent causing acute epidemic gastroenteritis and causes approximately 10% of all outbreaks of gastroenteritis in man (Murray et al., 1998).
Vesiviruses are now emerging from being regarded as somewhat obscure and host specific to being recognized as one of the more versatile groups of viral pathogens known. For example, a single serotype has been shown to infect a diverse group of 16 different species of animals that include a saltwater fish (opal eye), sea lion, swine, and man.
C. Togavirus. Members of this family include the mosquito-borne viruses which infect both humans and animals. The family includes the genera Alphavirus, Rubivirus (rubella), Pestivirus (mucosal disease), Arterivirus (equine arteritis) and the Hepatitis E virus (HEV).
HEV was initially described in 1987 and first reported in the U.S. in 1991. The virus was initially described as a Calicivirus based on the small, single-stranded RNA character. Some still classify HEV as a Calicivirus, but it has also been classified as a member of the Togavirus family. Infection appears to be much like hepatitis A viral infection. The disease is an acute viral hepatitis which is apparent about 20 days after initial infection, and the virus may be observed for about 20 days in the serum. Transmission occurs through contaminated water and geographically the virus is restricted to less developed countries.
D. Flavivirus. Members of this family include several serious human pathogens, among them mosquito-borne viruses of yellow fever, West Nile fever, hepatitis C, Japanese encephalitis, St. Louis encephalitis, Murray Valley encephalitis, and dengue.
The flavivirus virion is approximately 40 to 50 nm in diameter. The symmetry of the flavivirus nucleocapsid has not been fully defined. It is known that the flavivirus envelope contains only one species of glycoprotein. As yet, no subgenomic messenger RNA nor polyprotein precursors have been detected for the flavivirus.
III. Viral Target Regions
The preferred target sequence is a region that spans the AUG start site of the first open reading frame (ORF1) of the viral genome. The first ORF generally encodes a polyprotein containing non-structural proteins such as polymerases, helicases and proteases. By “spans the AUG start site” is meant that the target sequence includes at least three bases on one side of the AUG start site and at least two bases on the other (a total of at least 8 bases). Preferably, it includes at least four bases on each side of the start site (a total of at least 11 bases).
More generally, preferred target sites include targets that are conserved between a variety of viral isolates. Other favored sites include the IRES (internal ribosome entry site), transactivation protein binding sites, and sites of initiation of replication. Complex and large viral genomes, which may provide multiple redundant genes, may be efficiently targeted by targeting host cellular genes coding for viral entry and host response to viral presence.
A variety of viral-genome sequences are available from well known sources, such as the NCBI Genbank databases. Alternatively, a person skilled in the art can find sequences for many of the subject viruses in the open literature, e.g., by searching for references that disclose sequence information on designated viruses. Once a complete or partial viral sequence is obtained, the ORF1 of the virus is identified. Typically, the ORF1 is identified in the gene database or reference relied on. Alternatively, one may be guided by the general genomic organization of the viruses, as described below for these four families.
The AUG start site of ORF1 may also be identified in the gene database or reference relied upon, or it may be found by scanning the sequence for an AUG codon in the region of the expected ORF1 start site.
The general genomic organization of each of the four virus families is given below, followed by exemplary target sequences obtained for selected members (genera, species or strains) within each family.
A. Picornavirus.
The target initial AUG start site is located between base positions 615-640. Targeting this region is effective to inhibit translation of both polyprotein segments 14, 16.
B. Calicivirus.
The target initial AUG start site is located between base positions 7-35. Targeting this region is effective in inhibiting the translation of first reading frame 24.
C. Togavirus.
D. Flavivirus.
GenBank references for exemplary viral nucleic acid sequences containing the ORF1 start site in the corresponding viral genomes are listed in Table 3, below. It will be appreciated that these sequences are only illustrative of other sequences in the ORF1 start-site region of members of the four virus families, as may be available from available gene-sequence databases of literature or patent resources. The sequences below, identified as SEQ ID NOs 1-15, are listed in Table 10 at the end of the specification.
As indicated above, the targeting sequence, that is, the base sequence of the antisense oligomer, is preferably directed against an AUG start-site region of the first open reading frame of the virus, typically including up to 100 bases upstream of the start codon, and up to 25 bases downstream thereof In particular, the targeting sequence is complementary, or substantially complementary, as defined above, to at least 8, and preferably at least 12, typically 12-25 contiguous bases of the AUG start site region of the first open reading frame of the viral genome, and the degree of complementarity between the target and targeting sequence is sufficient to form a stable duplex. In one embodiment, the targeting sequence includes a CAT sequence directed against the AUG codon, and at least three bases on one side of this sequence, and two on the other. In other embodiments, the targeting sequence is complementary to a sequence in the start-site region that is entirely upstream or entirely downstream of the AUG start site. An antisense oligomer of about 15 bases is generally long enough to have a unique complementary sequence in the viral genome. In addition, a minimum length of complementary bases may be required to achieve the requisite binding Tm, as discussed below.
Oligomers as long as 40 bases may be suitable, where at least a minimum number of bases, e.g., 12 bases, are complementary to the target sequence. In general, however, facilitated or active uptake in cells is optimized at oligomer lengths less than about 30, preferably less than 25. For PMO oligomers, described further below, an optimum balance of binding stability and uptake generally occurs at lengths of 15-22 bases.
The oligomer may be 100% complementary to the viral nucleic acid target sequence, or it may include mismatches, e.g., to accommodate variants, as long as a heteroduplex formed between the oligomer and viral nucleic acid target sequence is sufficiently stable to withstand the action of cellular nucleases and other modes of degradation which may occur in vivo. Oligomer backbones which are less susceptible to cleavage by nucleases are discussed below. Mismatches, if present, are less destabilizing toward the end regions of the hybrid duplex than in the middle. The number of mismatches allowed will depend on the length of the oligomer, the percentage of G:C base pairs in the duplex, and the position of the mismatch(es) in the duplex, according to well understood principles of duplex stability. Although such an antisense oligomer is not necessarily 100% complementary to the viral nucleic acid target sequence, it is effective to stably and specifically bind to the target sequence, such that a biological activity of the nucleic acid target, e.g., expression of viral protein(s), is modulated.
The stability of the duplex formed between the oligomer and the target sequence is a function of the binding Tm and the susceptibility of the duplex to cellular enzymatic cleavage. The Tm of an antisense compound with respect to complementary-sequence RNA may be measured by conventional methods, such as those described by Hames et al., Nucleic Acid Hybridization, IRL Press, 1985, pp. 107-108. Each antisense oligomer should have a binding Tm, with respect to a complementary-sequence RNA, of greater than body temperature and preferably greater than 50° C. Tm's in the range 60-80° C. or greater are preferred. According to well known principles, the Tm of an oligomer compound, with respect to a complementary-based RNA hybrid, can be increased by increasing the ratio of C:G paired bases in the duplex, and/or by increasing the length (in base pairs) of the heteroduplex. At the same time, for purposes of optimizing cellular uptake, it may be advantageous to limit the size of the oligomer. For this reason, compounds that show high Tm (50° C. or greater) at a length of 15 bases or less are generally preferred over those requiring 20+ bases for high Tm values.
According to one aspect of the invention, the antisense activity of the oligomer is enhanced by using a mixture of uncharged and cationic phosphorodiamidate linkages as shown in
Table 4 lists exemplary targeting sequences directed against a target region that spans the translation initiation site of the first open reading frame (ORF1) of selected viruses of the picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus, and flavivirus families. These sequences were selected, as indicated above, by constructing a complementary sequence to one or more sequences spanning the AUG site in the target sequences given above.
Exceptions to this general rule are the following: SEQ ID NO: 26 is directed to the origin of the viral genome; SEQ ID NOs: 23-25 contain mismatches and/or inserts, as indicated by underlining; and SEQ ID NO: 33 includes only one base of the ATG start codon.
IV. Antisense Oligomers
A. Properties
As detailed above, the oligomer has a base sequence directed against a targeted portion of the viral genome, preferably spanning the ORF1 start site. In addition, the oligomer is able to effectively target infecting viruses, when administered to an infected host cell, e.g. in an infected mammalian subject.
The latter requirement is met when the oligomer compound (a) has the ability to be actively taken up by mammalian cells, and (b) once taken up, form a duplex with the target ssRNA with a Tm of greater than about 50° C.
As will be described below, the ability to be taken up by cells requires that the oligomer backbone be substantially uncharged, and, preferably, that the oligomer structure is recognized as a substrate for active or facilitated transport across the cell membrane. The ability of the oligomer to form a stable duplex with the target RNA will also depend on the oligomer backbone, as well as factors noted above, the length and degree of complementarity of the antisense with respect to the target, the ratio of G:C to A:T base matches, and the positions of any mismatched bases. The ability of the antisense agent to resist cellular nucleases promotes survival and ultimate delivery of the agent to the cell cytoplasm.
Below are disclosed methods for testing any given, substantially uncharged backbone for its ability to meet these requirements.
A1. Active or Facilitated Uptake by Cells
The antisense compound may be taken up by host cells by facilitated or active transport across the host cell membrane if administered in free (non-complexed) form, or by an endocytotic mechanism if administered in complexed form.
In the case where the agent is administered in free form, the antisense compound should be substantially uncharged, meaning that a majority of its intersubunit linkages are uncharged at physiological pH. Experiments carried out in support of the invention indicate that a small number of net charges, e.g., 1-2 for a 15- to 20-mer oligomer, can in fact enhance cellular uptake of certain oligomers with substantially uncharged backbones. The charges may be carried on the oligomer itself, e.g., in the backbone linkages, or may be terminal charged-group appendages. Preferably, the number of charged linkages is no more than one charged linkage per four uncharged linkages. More preferably, the number is no more than one charged linkage per ten, or no more than one per twenty, uncharged linkages. In one embodiment, the oligomer is fully uncharged.
An oligomer may also contain both negatively and positively charged backbone linkages, as long as opposing charges are present in approximately equal number. Preferably, the oligomer does not include runs of more than 3-5 consecutive subunits of either charge. For example, the oligomer may have a given number of anionic linkages, e.g. phosphorothioate or N3′→P5′ phosphoramidate linkages, and a comparable number of cationic linkages, such as N,N-diethylenediamine phosphoramidates (Dagle, 2000). The net charge is preferably neutral or at most 1-2 net charges per oligomer.
In addition to being substantially or fully uncharged, the antisense agent is preferably a substrate for a membrane transporter system (i.e. a membrane protein or proteins) capable of facilitating transport or actively transporting the oligomer across the cell membrane. This feature may be determined by one of a number of tests for oligomer interaction or cell uptake, as follows.
A first test assesses binding at cell surface receptors, by examining the ability of an oligomer compound to displace or be displaced by a selected charged oligomer, e.g., a phosphorothioate oligomer, on a cell surface. The cells are incubated with a given quantity of test oligomer, which is typically fluorescently labeled, at a final oligomer concentration of between about 10-300 nM. Shortly thereafter, e.g., 10-30 minutes (before significant internalization of the test oligomer can occur), the displacing compound is added, in incrementally increasing concentrations. If the test compound is able to bind to a cell surface receptor, the displacing compound will be observed to displace the test compound. If the displacing compound is shown to produce 50% displacement at a concentration of 10× the test compound concentration or less, the test compound is considered to bind at the same recognition site for the cell transport system as the displacing compound.
A second test measures cell transport, by examining the ability of the test compound to transport a labeled reporter, e.g., a fluorescence reporter, into cells. The cells are incubated in the presence of labeled test compound, added at a final concentration between about 10-300 nM. After incubation for 30-120 minutes, the cells are examined, e.g., by microscopy, for intracellular label. The presence of significant intracellular label is evidence that the test compound is transported by facilitated or active transport.
The antisense compound may also be administered in conjugated form with an arginine-rich peptide linked covalently to the 5′ or 3′ end of the antisense oligomer. The peptide is typically 8-16 amino acids and consists of a mixture of arginine, and other amino acids including phenyalanine and cysteine. The peptide may also contain non-natural amino acids such as beta-alanine and 6-aminohexanoic acid. Exemplary arginine-rich peptide are listed as SEQ ID NOS: 41-43. The use of arginine-rich peptide-PMO conjugates can be used to enhance cellular uptake of the antisense oligomer (See, e.g. (Moulton, Nelson et al. 2004). Single letter codes for amino acids are used expect for the non-natural amino acids beta-alanine (β-Ala) and 6-aminohexanoic acid (Ahx).
In some instances, liposomes may be employed to facilitate uptake of the antisense oligonucleotide into cells. (See, e.g., Williams, S. A., Leukemia 10(12):1980-1989, 1996; Lappalainen et al., Antiviral Res. 23:119, 1994; Uhlmann et al., antisense oligonucleotides: a new therapeutic principle, Chemical Reviews, Volume 90, No. 4, pages 544-584, 1990; Gregoriadis, G., Chapter 14, Liposomes, Drug Carriers in Biology and Medicine, pp. 287-341, Academic Press, 1979). Hydrogels may also be used as vehicles for antisense oligomer administration, for example, as described in WO 93/01286. Alternatively, the oligonucleotides may be administered in microspheres or microparticles. (See, e.g., Wu, G. Y. and Wu, C. H., J. Biol. Chem. 262:4429-4432, 1987). Alternatively, the use of gas-filled microbubbles complexed with the antisense oligomers can enhance delivery to target tissues, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,245,747.
The antisense compound may be administered in complexed form, where the complexing agent is typically a polymer, e.g., a cationic lipid, polypeptide, or non-biological cationic polymer, having an opposite charge to any net charge on the antisense compound. Methods of forming complexes, including bilayer complexes, between anionic oligonucleotides and cationic lipid or other polymer components, are well known. For example, the liposomal composition Lipofectin® (Felgner et al., 1987), containing the cationic lipid DOTMA (N-[1-(2,3-dioleyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride) and the neutral phospholipid DOPE (dioleyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine), is widely used. After administration, the complex is taken up by cells through an endocytotic mechanism, typically involving particle encapsulation in endosomal bodies.
Alternatively, and according to another aspect of the invention, the requisite properties of oligomers with any given backbone can be confirmed by a simple in vivo test, in which a labeled compound is administered to an animal, and a body fluid sample, taken from the animal several hours after the oligomer is administered, assayed for the presence of heteroduplex with target RNA. This method is detailed in subsection D below.
A2. Substantial Resistance to RNaseH
Two general mechanisms have been proposed to account for inhibition of expression by antisense oligonucleotides. (See e.g., Agrawal et al., 1990; Bonham et al., 1995; and Boudvillain et al., 1997). In the first, a heteroduplex formed between the oligonucleotide and the viral RNA acts as a substrate for RNaseH, leading to cleavage of the viral RNA. Oligonucleotides belonging, or proposed to belong, to this class include phosphorothioates, phosphotriesters, and phosphodiesters (unmodified “natural” oligonucleotides). However, because such compounds would expose the viral RNA in an oligomer:RNA duplex structure to proteolysis by RNaseH, and therefore loss of duplex, they are suboptimal for use in the present invention.
A second class of oligonucleotide analogs, termed “steric blockers” or, alternatively, “RNaseH inactive” or “RNaseH resistant”, have not been observed to act as a substrate for RNaseH, and are believed to act by sterically blocking target RNA nucleocytoplasmic transport, splicing or translation. This class includes methylphosphonates (Toulme et al., 1996), morpholino oligonucleotides, peptide nucleic acids (PNA's), certain 2′-O-allyl or 2′-O-alkyl modified oligonucleotides (Bonham, 1995), and N3′→P5′ phosphoramidates (Gee, 1998; Ding, 1996).
A test oligomer can be assayed for its RNaseH resistance by forming an RNA:oligomer duplex with the test compound, then incubating the duplex with RNaseH under a standard assay conditions, as described in Stein et al. After exposure to RNaseH, the presence or absence of intact duplex can be monitored by gel electrophoresis or mass spectrometry.
A3. In vivo Uptake
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a simple, rapid test for confirming that a given antisense oligomer type provides the required characteristics noted above, namely, high Tm, ability to be actively taken up by the host cells, and substantial resistance to RNaseH. This method is based on the discovery that a properly designed antisense compound will form a stable heteroduplex with the complementary portion of the viral RNA target when administered to a mammalian subject, and the heteroduplex subsequently appears in the urine (or other body fluid). Details of this method are also given in co-owned U.S. Patent applications, Ser. No. 09/736,920, entitled “Non-Invasive Method for Detecting Target RNA” (Non-Invasive Method), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Briefly, a test oligomer containing a backbone to be evaluated, having a base sequence targeted against a known RNA, is injected into a mammalian subject. The antisense oligomer may be directed against any intracellular RNA, including a host RNA or the RNA of an infecting virus. Several hours (typically 8-72) after administration, the urine is assayed for the presence of the antisense-RNA heteroduplex. If heteroduplex is detected, the backbone is suitable for use in the antisense oligomers of the present invention.
The test oligomer may be labeled, e.g. by a fluorescent or a radioactive tag, to facilitate subsequent analyses, if it is appropriate for the mammalian subject. The assay can be in any suitable solid-phase or fluid format. Generally, a solid-phase assay involves first binding the heteroduplex analyte to a solid-phase support, e.g., particles or a polymer or test-strip substrate, and detecting the presence/amount of heteroduplex bound. In a fluid-phase assay, the analyte sample is typically pretreated to remove interfering sample components. If the oligomer is labeled, the presence of the heteroduplex is confirmed by detecting the label tags. For non-labeled compounds, the heteroduplex may be detected by immunoassay if in solid phase format or by mass spectroscopy or other known methods if in solution or suspension format.
When the antisense oligomer is complementary to a virus-specific region of the viral genome (such as the translation initiation region of ORF1, as described above), the method can be used to detect the presence of a given ssRNA virus, or reduction in the amount of virus during a treatment method.
B. Exemplary Oligomer Backbones
Examples of nonionic linkages that may be used in oligonucleotide analogs are shown in
Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) (
A preferred oligomer structure employs morpholino-based subunits bearing base-pairing moieties, joined by uncharged linkages interspersed with cationic linkages, as described above. Especially preferred is a substantially uncharged and cationic phosphorodiamidate-linked morpholino oligomer, such as illustrated in
Important properties of the morpholino-based subunits shown in FIGS. 1A-E include: the ability to be linked in a oligomeric form by stable, uncharged backbone linkages; the ability to support a nucleotide base (e.g. adenine, cytosine, guanine or uracil) such that the polymer formed can hybridize with a complementary-base target nucleic acid, including target RNA, with high Tm, even with oligomers as short as 10-14 bases; the ability of the oligomer to be actively transported into mammalian cells; and the ability of the oligomer:RNA heteroduplex to resist RNAse degradation.
Exemplary backbone structures for antisense oligonucleotides of the invention include the β-morpholino subunit types shown in FIGS. 1A-E, each linked by an uncharged, phosphorus-containing subunit linkage.
Particularly preferred morpholino oligonucleotides include those composed of morpholino subunit structures of the form shown in
The antisense compounds can be prepared by stepwise solid-phase synthesis, employing methods detailed in the references cited above. In some cases, it may be desirable to add additional chemical moieties to the antisense compound, e.g. to enhance pharmacokinetics or to facilitate capture or detection of the compound. Such a moiety may be covalently attached, typically to a terminus of the oligomer, according to standard synthetic methods. For example, addition of a polyethyleneglycol moiety or other hydrophilic polymer, e.g., one having 10-100 monomeric subunits, may be useful in enhancing solubility. One or more charged groups, e.g., anionic charged groups such as an organic acid, may enhance cell uptake. A reporter moiety, such as fluorescein or a radiolabeled group, may be attached for purposes of detection. Alternatively, the reporter label attached to the oligomer may be a ligand, such as an antigen or biotin, capable of binding a labeled antibody or streptavidin. In selecting a moiety for attachment or modification of an oligomer antisense, it is generally of course desirable to select chemical compounds of groups that are biocompatible and likely to be tolerated by a subject without undesirable side effects. The method for synthesizing the 1-piperazino group linkages is described below with respect to
V. Inhibition of Viral Replication
The antisense compounds detailed above are useful in inhibiting replication of ssRNA viruses of the picornavirus, calicivirus, togavirus, and flavivirus families. In one embodiment, such inhibition is effective in treating infection of a host animal by these viruses. Accordingly, the method comprises, in one embodiment, contacting a cell infected with the virus with an antisense agent effective to inhibit the translation of a polyprotein encoded in the first open reading frame of the genome of the specific virus. In a further embodiment, the antisense agent is administered to a mammalian subject, e.g., human or domestic animal, infected with a given virus, in a suitable pharmaceutical carrier. It is contemplated that the antisense oligonucleotide arrests the growth of the RNA virus in the host. The RNA virus may be decreased in number or eliminated with little or no detrimental effect on the normal growth or development of the host.
A. Identification of the Infective Agent
The specific virus causing the infection can be determined by methods known in the art, e.g. serological or cultural methods, or by methods employing the antisense oligomers of the present invention.
Serological identification employs a viral sample or culture isolated from a biological specimen, e.g., stool, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, blood, etc., of the subject. Immunoassay for the detection of virus is generally carried out by methods routinely employed by those of skill in the art, e.g., ELISA or Western blot. In addition, monoclonal antibodies specific to particular viral strains or species are often commercially available.
Culture methods may be used to isolate and identify particular types of virus, by employing techniques including, but not limited to, comparing characteristics such as rates of growth and morphology under various culture conditions.
Another method for identifying the viral infective agent in an infected subject employs one or more antisense oligomers targeting broad families and/or genera of viruses, e.g., Picornaviridae, Caliciviridae, Togaviridae and Flaviviridae. Sequences targeting any characteristic viral RNA can be used. The desired target sequences are preferably (i) common to broad virus families/genera, and (ii) not found in humans. Characteristic nucleic acid sequences for a large number of infectious viruses are available in public databases, and may serve as the basis for the design of specific oligomers.
For each plurality of oligomers, the following steps are carried out: (a) the oligomer(s) are administered to the subject; (b) at a selected time after said administering, a body fluid sample is obtained from the subject; and (c) the sample is assayed for the presence of a nuclease-resistant heteroduplex comprising the antisense oligomer and a complementary portion of the viral genome. Steps (a)-(c) are carried for at least one such oligomer, or as many as is necessary to identify the virus or family of viruses. Oligomers can be administered and assayed sequentially or, more conveniently, concurrently. The virus is identified based on the presence (or absence) of a heteroduplex comprising the antisense oligomer and a complementary portion of the viral genome of the given known virus or family of viruses.
Preferably, a first group of oligomers, targeting broad families, is utilized first, followed by selected oligomers complementary to specific genera and/or species and/or strains within the broad family/genus thereby identified. This second group of oligomers includes targeting sequences directed to specific genera and/or species and/or strains within a broad family/genus. Several different second oligomer collections, i.e. one for each broad virus family/genus tested in the first stage, are generally provided. Sequences are selected which are (i) specific for the individual genus/species/strains being tested and (ii) not found in humans.
B. Administration of the Antisense Oligomer
Effective delivery of the antisense oligomer to the target nucleic acid is an important aspect of treatment. In accordance with the invention, routes of antisense oligomer delivery include, but are not limited to, various systemic routes, including oral and parenteral routes, e.g., intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intramuscular, as well as inhalation, transdermal and topical delivery. The appropriate route may be determined by one of skill in the art, as appropriate to the condition of the subject under treatment. For example, an appropriate route for delivery of an antisense oligomer in the treatment of a viral infection of the skin is topical delivery, while delivery of an antisense oligomer for the treatment of a viral respiratory infection is by inhalation. The oligomer may also be delivered directly to the site of viral infection, or to the bloodstream.
The antisense oligomer may be administered in any convenient vehicle which is physiologically acceptable. Such a composition may include any of a variety of standard pharmaceutically accepted carriers employed by those of ordinary skill in the art. Examples include, but are not limited to, saline, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), water, aqueous ethanol, emulsions, such as oil/water emulsions or triglyceride emulsions, tablets and capsules. The choice of suitable physiologically acceptable carrier will vary dependent upon the chosen mode of administration.
In some instances, liposomes may be employed to facilitate uptake of the antisense oligonucleotide into cells. (See, e.g., Williams, S. A., Leukemia 10(12):1980-1989, 1996; Lappalainen et al., Antiviral Res. 23:119, 1994; Uhlmann et al., ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDES: A NEW THERAPEUTIC PRINCIPLE, Chemical Reviews, Volume 90, No. 4, pages 544-584, 1990; Gregoriadis, G., Chapter 14, Liposomes, Drug Carriers in Biology and Medicine, pp. 287-341, Academic Press, 1979). Hydrogels may also be used as vehicles for antisense oligomer administration, for example, as described in WO 93/01286. Alternatively, the oligonucleotides may be administered in microspheres or microparticles. (See, e.g., Wu, G. Y. and Wu, C. H., J. Biol. Chem. 262:4429-4432, 1987)
Sustained release compositions may also be used. These may include semipermeable polymeric matrices in the form of shaped articles such as films or microcapsules.
In one aspect of the method, the subject is a human subject, e.g., a patient diagnosed as having a localized or systemic viral infection. The condition of a patient may also dictate prophylactic administration of an antisense oligomer of the invention, e.g. in the case of a patient who (1) is immunocompromised; (2) is a burn victim; (3) has an indwelling catheter; or (4) is about to undergo or has recently undergone surgery. In one preferred embodiment, the oligomer is a phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer, contained in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, and is delivered orally. In another preferred embodiment, the oligomer is a phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer, contained in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, and is delivered intravenously (IV).
In another application of the method, the subject is a livestock animal, e.g., a chicken, turkey, pig, cow or goat, etc, and the treatment is either prophylactic or therapeutic. The invention also includes a livestock and poultry food composition containing a food grain supplemented with a subtherapeutic amount of an antiviral antisense compound of the type described above. Also contemplated is, in a method of feeding livestock and poultry with a food grain supplemented with subtherapeutic levels of an antiviral, an improvement in which the food grain is supplemented with a subtherapeutic amount of an antiviral oligonucleotide composition as described above.
The antisense compound is generally administered in an amount and manner effective to result in a peak blood concentration of at least 200-400 nM antisense oligomer. Typically, one or more doses of antisense oligomer are administered, generally at regular intervals, for a period of about one to two weeks. Preferred doses for oral administration are from about 1-25 mg oligomer per 70 kg. In some cases, doses of greater than 25 mg oligomer/patient may be necessary. For IV administration, preferred doses are from about 0.5 mg to 10 mg oligomer per 70 kg. The antisense oligomer may be administered at regular intervals for a short time period, e.g., daily for two weeks or less. However, in some cases the oligomer is administered intermittently over a longer period of time. Administration may be followed by, or concurrent with, administration of an antibiotic or other therapeutic treatment. The treatment regimen may be adjusted (dose, frequency, route, etc.) as indicated, based on the results of immunoassays, other biochemical tests and physiological examination of the subject under treatment.
C. Monitoring of Treatment
An effective in vivo treatment regimen using the antisense oligonucleotides of the invention may vary according to the duration, dose, frequency and route of administration, as well as the condition of the subject under treatment (i.e., prophylactic administration versus administration in response to localized or systemic infection). Accordingly, such in vivo therapy will often require monitoring by tests appropriate to the particular type of viral infection under treatment, and corresponding adjustments in the dose or treatment regimen, in order to achieve an optimal therapeutic outcome. Treatment may be monitored, e.g., by general indicators of infection, such as complete blood count (CBC), nucleic acid detection methods, immunodiagnostic tests, viral culture, or detection of heteroduplex.
The efficacy of an in vivo administered antisense oligomer of the invention in inhibiting or eliminating the growth of one or more types of RNA virus may be determined from biological samples (tissue, blood, urine etc.) taken from a subject prior to, during and subsequent to administration of the antisense oligomer. Assays of such samples include (1) monitoring the presence or absence of heteroduplex formation with target and non-target sequences, using procedures known to those skilled in the art, e.g., an electrophoretic gel mobility assay; (2) monitoring the amount of viral protein production, as determined by standard techniques such as ELISA or Western blotting, or (3) measuring the effect on viral titer, e.g. by the method of Spearman-Karber. (See, for example, Pari, G. S. et al., Antimicrob. Agents and Chemotherapy 39(5):1157-1161, 1995; Anderson, K. P. et al., Antimicrob. Agents and Chemotherapy 40(9):2004-2011, 1996, Cottral, G. E. (ed) in: Manual of Standard Methods for Veterinary Microbiology, pp. 60-93, 1978).
A preferred method of monitoring the efficacy of the antisense treatment is by detection of the antisense-RNA heteroduplex. At selected time(s) after antisense administration, a body fluid is collected for detecting the presence and/or measuring the level of heteroduplex species in the sample. Typically, the body fluid sample is collected 3-24 hours after administration, preferably about 6-24 hours after administering. As indicated above, the body fluid sample may be urine, saliva, plasma, blood, spinal fluid, or other liquid sample of biological origin, and may include cells or cell fragments suspended therein, or the liquid medium and its solutes. The amount of sample collected is typically in the 0.1 to 10 ml range, preferably about 1 ml of less.
The sample may be treated to remove unwanted components and/or to treat the heteroduplex species in the sample to remove unwanted ssRNA overhang regions, e.g. by treatment with RNase. It is, of course, particularly important to remove overhang where heteroduplex detection relies on size separation, e.g., electrophoresis of mass spectroscopy.
A variety of methods are available for removing unwanted components from the sample. For example, since the heteroduplex has a net negative charge, electrophoretic or ion exchange techniques can be used to separate the heteroduplex from neutral or positively charged material. The sample may also be contacted with a solid support having a surface-bound antibody or other agent specifically able to bind the heteroduplex. After washing the support to remove unbound material, the heteroduplex can be released in substantially purified form for further analysis, e.g., by electrophoresis, mass spectroscopy or immunoassay.
The following examples illustrate but are not intended in any way to limit the invention.
Materials and Methods
Standard recombinant DNA techniques were employed in all constructions, as described in Ausubel, F M et al., in CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Media, Pa., 1992 and Sambrook, J. et al., in MOLECULAR CLONING: A LABORATORY MANUAL, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., Vol. 2, 1989).
The inhibitory effect on rhinovirus 16 of a phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMO) having a sequence targeted to the translation initiation zone of rhinovirus 14 was evaluated. The phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMO) were synthesized at AVI BioPharma (Corvallis, Oreg.), as described in Summerton and Weller, 1997. Purity of the full-length oligomer was greater than 90% as determined by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography and MALDI TOF mass spectroscopy. The lyophilized PMOs were dissolved in sterile 0.9% NaCl and filtered through 0.2 μm Acrodisc filters (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, Mich.) prior to use in cell cultures.
The PMO includes a nucleic acid sequence targeting rhinovirus 14 and containing three mispairs in respect to the rhinovirus 16 target sequence. The target sequence (GenBank NC001752 618-637; SEQ ID NO: 5) and targeting sequence (SEQ ID NO: 18) are as follows:
where the bolded codon is the start codon, and the mispairs are underlined.
A schematic of a synthetic pathway that can be used to make morpholino subunits containing a (1 piperazino) phosphinylideneoxy linkage is shown in
The acid chloride (4) is reacted with morpholino subunits (moN), which may be prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,185,444 or in Summerton and Weller, 1997 (cited above), to provide the activated subunits (5, 6, 7). Suitable protecting groups are used for the nucleoside bases, where necessary; for example, benzoyl for adenine and cytosine, isobutyryl for guanine, and pivaloylmethyl for inosine. The subunits containing the (1 piperazino) phosphinylideneoxy linkage can be incorporated into the existing PMO synthesis protocol, as described, for example in Summerton and Weller (1997), without modification.
Twenty-four hour old cultures of HeLa cells were grown in six well plates for 24 hours. Confluent monolayers were propagated in Earles minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 5% bovine calf serum, L-glutamine, antibiotics, and sodium bicarbonate. Cells were incubated at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Prior to treatment, the monolayers were rinsed twice with MEM without serum.
The PMOs were introduced into the cultured cells by a “scrape-loading” method, which is known to deliver PMOs to 80-90% of the adherent cells in the culture (Partridge et al., 1996). The oligomers were diluted to a final concentration of 20 μM in MEM without serum. A 0.5 ml volume of oligomer-MEM media was added to the cultures and after 1 minute at room temperature the cells were gently scraped off with a rubber policeman. The cells were returned to the CO2 incubator for 10 minutes, then diluted into 8 ml of MEM with calf serum and dispersed in 0.1 ml per well of a 96-well plate containing log dilutions of rhinovirus 16 (8 wells per dilution). The plates were incubated for 72 hours at 37° C. in the CO2 incubator, after which time they were examined with an Olympus CK light microscope for the presence of cytopathic effect. Viral titers (TCID50) were determined by the method of Spearman-Karber. Viral titer for the different treatment groups is shown in Table 6 below and graphically in
The results show greater than 75% inhibition of the viral titer of HRV-16 when treated with PMO antisense to the HRV-14. While efficacy is lower than the efficacy of rhinovirus 16 targeting sequence directed against rhinovirus 16 infection, demonstrated in a previous study, as expected from the three mismatched basepairs, the study confirms the antiviral effects of PMOs substantially complementary to the translation initiation zone of the HRV-16 genome.
The antiviral efficacy of three phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMO) targeted to the ORF1 translation initiation zone of the strains Pan-1 and SMSV-13 of the vesivirus genus of Caliciviridae was evaluated. The PMOs were scrape-loaded, as described above, to two host cell lines, Porcine kidney cells (PK-15) (ATCC No. CCL33) and African Green Monkey Kidney cells (ATCC No. CCL81) (Vero), which were subsequently exposed to vesiviruses of the strains Pan-1 and SMSV-13. The protocol of Example 1 was followed for incubation and determination of viral load.
The three PMOs each included a targeting sequence complementary to the Pan-1 sequence (GenBank accession no. AF091736) spanning the start codon of ORF1. PMOs were used at a concentration of 20 μm in serum free media. A saline blank and scrambled sequence control PMO were included in the study. The PMO sequences, identified as ORF1.1 (SEQ ID NO. 27), ORF1.2 (SEQ ID NO. 28), and ORF1.3 (SEQ ID NO. 29), and the target site locations are listed in Table 7 below.
The inhibitory effects of the PMOs on the viral titer of SMSV-13 and Pan-1 in both PK-15 and Vero cells are provided in Table 8. A simple percent inhibition average is presented when both cell types were tested with a given viral strain.
Significant inhibition of viral titer was observed with the ORF1-targeting PMOs in both cell lines and for both viral serotypes, with “ORF1.1” being most effective. The scrambled control PMO had no inhibitory effect.
In dose response studies, Vero cells were loaded with PMOs having ORF1.1 and ORF1.3 targeting sequences and subsequently exposed to vesivirus strain SMSV-13, following the protocol described in Example 1. Treatment with the ORF1.1 PMO gave no inhibition at 0.2 and 1.0 μM, moderation inhibition at 2.0 μM, and high inhibition at 20 μM. The ORF1.3 PMO gave no inhibition of SMSV-13 viral titer at 0.2 μM, but inhibition was high at 1.0 μM; no additional inhibition was observed at 2, 10, and 20 μM.
A feline calicivirus that became a hemorrhagic virus to the cat was isolated and propagated in a cell culture. The cell culture was exposed, following the protocol described in Example 1, to an antisense PMO having the following targeting sequence: CAG AGT TTG AGA CAT TGT CTC (SEQ ID No. 32). A one-log reduction of viral titer was observed in the cell culture.
The study was performed on pathogen-free female CB6F1 and SCID/beige mice obtained from Harlan Inc. (reared and maintained in the Weizmann Institute Animal Breeding Center). The mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free environment; allowed sterile food and acidified water ad lib prior to initiation of the study.
CB6F1 mice were thymectomized at the age of 7-9 weeks. Experiments were performed using CB6F1 mice at the age of 12-18 weeks (19-25 g/mouse). Prior to heterotransplantation, the CB6F1 mice received a split dose of total body irradiation (4 Gy followed 1 day later by 11 Gy) from a gamma beam 150-A 60Co source (Atomic Energy of Canada) with irradiation rate of 0.7 Gy/min. After the first irradiation, ciprofloxacin (20 μg/ml; Bayer) was added to drinking water for 7-10 days. Immediately after the second radiation dose, mice were injected i.v. with 4-6×106 bone-marrow cells (in 0.2 ml PBS) obtained from 6-10 weeks old SCID/beige mice.
CB6F1 mice were anesthetized with 10 mg/mouse of 2,2,2 tribromoethanol (Aldrich) and a laparotomy performed. Human liver fragments infected ex vivo with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were transplanted behind the ear pinna. The incisions were closed with 9 mm autoclip wound clips.
The mice were treated with PMO antisense to the HCV nucleic sequence spanning the AUG site of the first open reading frame, having the targeting sequence GTG CTC ATG GTG CAG GGT C (SEQ ID No. 35). Treatments with the antisense compound or with saline were given from day 10 to day 17 post transplantation (total of 7 days) to four mice groups, containing approximately 17 animals each. PMO doses of 0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 mg/mouse/day were used. Bleeds were taken at days 16 (one day post treatment completion) and 21, and serum samples were evaluated.
Results are summarized in Table 9 and shown graphically in
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
