Antisoiling and anti-redeposition latices for the aqueous washing of textile articles

The present invention relates to latices which can be used as antisoiling and anti-redeposition agents for the aqueous washing of textile articles.
It is known that the detergent compositions currently marketed for the washing of synthetic or natural textile articles are complex mixtures of different products, all of which have well specified functions such as, for example, metal-complexing agents, surfactants, anticorrosion agents, detergents, anti-redeposition agents, bleaching agents or antisoiling agents.
Antisoiling agents essentially reduce the affinity of textile fibers for soilings, especially for greasy soilings, and thereby facilitate their removal.
Anti-redeposition agents essentially avoid the deposition of soiling on the textile fibers and especially avoid the redeposition of the soiling removed during washing.
The main subject of the invention consists of new agents having anti-redeposition and soiling-removal properties which are especially effective and relatively low in cost.
Another subject of the invention relates to washing compositions employing these new antisoiling agents.
In this text and throughout the remainder of the description, the term latex is used in its customary sense, i.e., to denote aqueous dispersions of solid polymers forming heterogeneous systems comprising an aqueous continuous phase and a solid discontinuous phase.
The alkali-soluble latices of the invention, which are the subject of the patent application, are in a dispersed state at a certain pH, in particular an acidic or neutral pH, and, when the pH is increased, undergo a disintegration of the abovementioned polymerized particles, thereby leading to aqueous solutions of polymers. In other words, the latices which are suitable in the context of the invention are those which, when the pH is increased, are capable of undergoing a change in their configuration dependent on the pH of the detergent bath.
The alkali-soluble latices of the general type here described are well-known products. Their preparation is considered to be well within the capability of the person of ordinary skill in the art.
However, it has been discovered that there is a series of latex compositions which can be synthesized at low cost, and which also have improved antisoiling and anti-redeposition properties relative to those of the latices described in the prior art.
The latices which are the subject of the present invention are all vinyl latices, composed of at least one copolymer of at least one vinyl ester with at least one unsaturated carboxylic acid, optionally grafted with at least one polyester sulfonate, or of at least one (meth)acrylic/unsaturated carboxylic acid copolymer grafted with at least one polyester sulfonate.
A first type of alkali-soluble latices which are very suitable in the context of the present invention includes latices based on vinyl esters. More especially, latices based on vinyl esters, ethylenically unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acids, and optionally, either at least one (meth)acrylic ester (differing, of course, from the specific vinyl ester(s) used) or at least one water-soluble comonomer, such as acrylamide or vinylsulfonate, can be used. Maleic, crotonic, (meth)acrylic and itaconic acids are preferred. Acrylic acid, when used, may be substituted by a methyl(meth)acrylic acid. In general, the content of acid (percentage by weight of acidic comonomer in the product) is at least 3%, and preferably ranges from 3 to 11%, more preferably 3 to 8%. Vinyl acetate is a preferred vinyl ester.
The first type of alkali-soluble latices which are the subject of the present invention also consists of the latices based on vinyl esters, described above, polymerized in the presence of polyester sulfonate.
A second type of alkali-soluble latices which are the subject of the present invention consists of at least one (meth)acrylic ester and at least one unsaturated carboxylic acid grafted with polyester sulfonates.
In the second type, latices based on (meth)acrylic esters, ethylenically unsaturated mono or dicarboxylic acids, and optionally, other monomers, such as styrene or butadiene, may be used.
Exemplary (meth)acrylic esters include alkyl (meth)acrylates in which the alkyl chain preferably contains 1 to 4 carbon atoms, such as methyl or ethyl (meth)acrylate.
Preferred acids for the second type of latices include (meth)acrylic, itaconic and maleic acids.
In principle, the content of acid (percentage by weight of comonomer in the product) in the second type of latex is at least 10% and generally ranges from 10% to 20%.
The content of polyester sulfonate with respect to the monomers is preferably less than 10%. The more preferred polyester sulfonates are those containing a distribution of phthalic or succinic acid with respect to ethylene oxide of approximately 60% by weight phthalic or succinic acid and 40% by weight of ethylene oxide groups. The distribution of the phthalic acid among its isomers is approximately as follows: 80% (by weight or moles) of terephthalic acid and 20% (by weight or moles) of isophthalic acid, the latter being almost completely sulfonated. For example, 15% by mole of sulfonated isophthalic acid may be used.
The latices of the present invention are preferably chosen from those of the first group of alkali-soluble latices, which have a composition which corresponds to the following distribution:
84 to 96% of vinyl acetate,
3 to 6% of acrylic or crotonic acid or acrylic acid substituted by a methyl (meth)acrylic acid, and
1 to 10% of polyester sulfonate.
It is preferable to use latices compositionally falling within the following limits:
vinyl acetate 87-94%
crotonic or acrylic acid 4-5%
polyester sulfonate 2-8%
Even more preferred are latices in which the acid is acrylic acid.
The above products which have undergone a partial or total hydrolysis of the vinyl acetate groups, that is to say a conversion of the vinyl acetate to vinyl alcohol, also form part of the invention.
Detergent compositions containing the latex described above also form part of the invention; they contain an amount of latex effective for improving the antisoiling and/or anti-redeposition properties of the detergent, preferably at least about 0.08%, more preferably at least 0.1% and still more preferably at least 0.4%, by weight of latex described above. On a ppm basis, it is preferred that the detergent compositions contain about 5-100 ppm of latex.
The detergent compositions can additionally contain typical washing additives, such as pyrophosphates, metaphosphates, alkali metal tripolyphosphates, zeolites, surfactants, a bleaching system, enzymes, optical brighteners, perfumes, silicates and the like.
The latex can also be incorporated in a rinsing composition, thereby, of course, enabling the latex to be added to the bath during rinsing.
Naturally, everything that has been stated above in the description relating to the nature and characteristics of the alkali-soluble latex applies here in relation to the detergent compositions, the latices participating in the constitution of the detergent being absolutely identical to those described above.
Examples will now be given. These Examples are for illustrative purposes only and in no way limit the invention.
The object of the tests used in the course of the examples which follow is to assess the antisoiling and anti-redeposition properties of a given additive.
The redeposition of soiling is a cumulative phenomenon which manifests itself by a graying of a cloth after a large number of washing cycles.

EXAMPLES 1 TO 4
To measure the anti-redeposition properties, the method used consists in washing samples of fabrics several times in the presence of the test additive and a soiled fabric. The experimental conditions are as follows:
Operating Conditions
Five cumulative washing cycles are performed according to the following conditions:
Washing temperature: 60.degree. C.
Washing time: 20 min. (7 min. of temperature rise and 13 min at 60.degree. C. The speed of agitation is 100 strokes/min.)
Dilution: addition of 250 ml of cold hard water, followed by 5 min. of agitation
3-5 min. rinsing in the presence of 500 ml of cold hard water
Water hardness (33.degree. French scale: 330 mg CaCO.sub.3 /1)
Drying of the fabrics by passing them twice in succession through a photographic glazer
Measurement of reflectance: GARDNER photometer filter Y, 4 thicknesses of fabric.
Fabrics
______________________________________Cotton 405Polyester cotton (PE/C) 7406 Source: TESTFABRICPolyester "Dacron 54" (PE)______________________________________
Soiling
KREFELD WFK (Alderstrasse, 44, Lieferschein)
EMPA (COTTON Saint GALLEN EMPA, materials testing Laboratory: Unterstrasse 11, P.O. Box, CH 9001, ST. GALL).
Equipment
Tergotometer (HOBOKEN, N.J., United States Testing Co., Inc.) (2 pots per test)
each tergotometer pot contains:
4 cotton test specimens (10.times.12 cm)
4 PE/C test specimens (10.times.12 cm)
4 polyester test specimens (10.times.12 cm)
4 KREFELD-soiled cotton test specimens (10.times.12 cm) or:
4 KREFELD-soiled cotton test specimens and 2 EMPA-soiled cotton test specimens (10.times.12 cm)
500 ml of detergent solution (the detergent concentration is 6 g/l)
Bath ratio 1:25
Assessment of Performance
The measurement of reflectance R.sub.y is performed using a GARDNER photometer, filter y, on 4 thicknesses of fabric. The more effective the additive, the greater the reflectance of the fabric washed 5 times in its presence, according to the test described above, and the more closely this reflectance approaches that of the clean fabric (R.sub.y =83%). The test products are especially active on synthetic fibers, and also on mixed fibers. The reflection measurements shown in the tables set forth below relate exclusively to the polyester fabrics.
Results of the Tests
We studied the influence of the following parameters on the anti-redeposition efficiency of the products:
the nature of and content of the acid;
the content of sulfonated polyester; and
the hydrolysis of acetate groups.
In the tables below, the contents of the vinyl acetate, crotonic or acrylic acid and sulfonated polyester constituents are expressed as percentages by weight. The performance of the best additives are compared with those of the commercial additive F4M (DOW CHEMICAL cellulose ether).
The composition by weight of the detergent formula used is as follows:
______________________________________Sodium alkylbenzenesulfonate 7%Sodium stearate 3%Cemulsol.sup.R DB 6/18 2.5%Cemulsol.sup.R LA 90 2.5%Sodium tripolyphosphate 28.75%Sodium pyrophosphate 2%Sodium orthophosphate 0.5%Sodium disilicate 9.35%Sodium sulfate 17.5%Tinopal .RTM. SOP 0.2%Tinopal .RTM. DMS X 0.2%Esperase enzyme, Novo 0.3%Sodium perborate 25%Magilex .RTM. 120 1%Sodium EDTA 0.2%______________________________________
EXAMPLE 1
Performance of different latices of the first type
The products noted in Table I are introduced in the form of a post-addition; the detergent concentration is 6 g/l, containing 0.42% of additive. Each sample of fabric is washed 5 times in the presence of the soiling.
TABLE I______________________________________ PERFOR- COMPO- MANCE % SITION % Reflectance vinyl % crotonic acrylic polyester- R.sub.y (poly-Product acetate acid acid sulfonates ester)______________________________________Blank 58F4M 77.51 95.50 3.50 -- 1 762 93.10 4.90 -- 2 783 91.35 4.80 -- 3.85 78.54 88 4.60 -- 7.40 785 92.30 -- 3.85 3.85 786 91.35 -- 4.80 3.85 787 88 4.60 7.40 77______________________________________
The blank reference test corresponds to five washings of fabrics in the presence of soiling and in the absence of additive.
EXAMPLE 2
This Example represents a study in terms of the concentration in the detergent. In conformity with Example 1, different tests are carried out by modifying the concentration of additive in the detergent bath.
post-addition introduction at different concentrations
detergent concentration 6 g/l
KREFELD soiling.
TABLE II______________________________________ PERFORMANCEPRODUCT R.sub.y (polyester)conc. in the bath 5 ppm 10 ppm 25 ppmconc. in the formula (0.08%) (0.17%) (0.42%)______________________________________5 72 77 787 73 76.5 77F4M 75 76 77Blank 58______________________________________
EXAMPLE 3
A study of the influence of the nature of the soiling was undertaken. The following conditions were employed:
post-addition introduction of the latex at a constant concentration in the bath=25 ppm
detergent concentration 6 g/l
KREFELD+EMPA soilings
TABLE III______________________________________PRODUCT R.sub.y polyester______________________________________-- 65F4M 455 777 78______________________________________
With the mixture of soilings, the cellulose ether undesirably enhances redeposition, whereas, in contrast, the claimed additives remain effective.
EXAMPLE 4
The additive product 5 (as defined in Table I above) was introduced into a thick mixture for spraying (slurry).
In a slurry, alkaline pH, ionic strength and high temperature tend to degrade delicate products; consequently, the detergent obtained from a slurry containing the additive was tested.
The usual ingredients of a detergent, such as TPP, ionic surfactants, sodium silicate, sodium sulfate and water are mixed to form a thick mixture which constitutes the slurry. This highly alkaline mixture is then dried by spraying to obtain a powder. Nonionic surfactants, bleaching agents, enzymes and perfumes are then added.
Two slurries were prepared: the additive product 5 is added to one of the slurries. To simulate the hydration of TPP and the spraying, these mixtures are maintained for 1 h 30 min at 90.degree. C. with stirring. Under these pH and temperature conditions, the additive product 5 is completely hydrolyzed; the vinyl acetate groups are converted to vinyl alcohol. Three formulae having the same overall composition as above--see the formula set forth above immediately prior to "Example 1"--were prepared from the slurries and tested under experimental conditions identical to those described in Example 1.
The characteristics of the formulae prepared are as follows:
formula X: prepared from the control slurry without additive.
formula Y: prepared from the control slurry without additive; the additive product 5 is introduced in the form of a post-addition in the proportion of 0.42% of the formula.
formula Z: prepared from the slurry containing the additive product 5; the percentage by weight of additive product 5 in the formula is 0.42%.
The reflectance values R.sub.y of the dacron fabric obtained with these formulae are recorded in Table IV below:
TABLE IV______________________________________Anti-redeposition properties of the additive product 5introduced into a slurry:DETERGENT FORMULA R.sub.y______________________________________X: without additive 54Y: post-addition in- 78troduction of ad-ditive (0.42%)Z: additive added to 80.5the slurry (0.42%)______________________________________
The results obtained with the additive product 5 introduced in a slurry are of the same order of magnitude as those obtained when this additive is introduced into the detergent bath. Consequently, it can be concluded that the product retains its anti-redeposition properties when it is introduced in a slurry. This example illustrates that, after hydrolysis, the polymers of the invention retain their anti-redeposition activity.
EXAMPLES 5 AND 6
To measure the antisoiling properties, the method used consists in washing samples of fabrics in the presence of the test additive, in depositing stains on these fabrics and in washing them again. The results obtained reflect the affinity for a soiling of the textiles conditioned in this manner. The experimental conditions are as follows:
Fabrics
______________________________________Cotton 405Polyester cotton (PE/C) 7404 Source: TESTFABRICPolyester "Dacron 54" (PE)______________________________________
Equipment
HANAU Linitest (2 pots per test)
Each Linitest pot contains:
10 stainless steel balls 12 mm in diameter
4 cotton rectangles (10.times.12 cm) equivalent to
4 PE/C rectangles (10.times.12 cm), 20 g of fabric
4 polyester rectangles (10.times.12 cm)
300 ml of detergent solution
Bath ratio 1:15.
Operating Conditions
Washing temperature: 60.degree. C.
Washing time: 40 min (25 min of temperature rise and 15 min at 60.degree. C.)
Dilution: addition of 150 ml of cold hard water followed by 5 min of agitation
3 5-min rinsings in the presence of 400 ml of cold hard water
Water hardness (33.degree. TH)
Drying of the fabrics by passing them twice in succession through a photographic glazer
Measurement reflectance of: GARDNER photometer filter Y, 4 thicknesses of fabric.
Soiling
Automobile sump oil.
Operating Procedure
Conditioning: a washing cycle is performed in the presence of the test additive. The additive can be introduced either into the detergent bath or during rinsing.
Staining: using a burette, 4 drops of sump oil are deposited at the center of the sample of fabric, arranged on a watch-glass. The fabrics are then placed in the oven at 60.degree. C. for one hour. One half of the samples are soiled in this manner.
Measurement of the reflectance of the stained fabrics (GARDNER, filter Y).
Washing: the procedure is the same as for the conditioning, but in the absence of additive. Each Linitest pot thus contains two stained samples and two unstained samples of each grade of fabric.
Measurement of the reflectance after washing (GARDNER, filter Y). The reflectance of the stained fabrics indicates the antisoiling effect.
Expression of the Results
The results relating to the removal of the soiling are expressed in the form of the "recovery" value R: ##EQU1## R.sub.s =reflectance of the soiled fabric before washing, R.sub.o =reflectance of the unsoiled fabric before washing,
R.sub.l =reflectance of the soiled fabric after washing.
The higher the recovery R, the greater the efficiency of the additive as an antisoiling agent.
EXAMPLE 5
This example illustrates the use of different latices whose characteristics are given in Tables V and VI.
TABLE V______________________________________(type 1 latex) COMPOSITION (%) % vinyl % crotonic % otherProduct acetate acid products______________________________________Blank -- -- --F4M -- -- -- Butyl acrylateL 8 84.5 5.5 10L 9 89.5 10.5 -- Itaconic acidL 10 91.8 2.2 6 AcrylamideL 11 91 5 4 Vinyl sulfonateL 12 91 5 4 Acrylic acidL 13 91 5 4 Maleic acidL 14 91 5 4 Butyl acrylateL 15 83.5 6.5 10L 16 95 5 --______________________________________
TABLE VI______________________________________(type 2 latex) Percentage by weight of monomer in theReference Nature of the monomore product______________________________________L 17 Butyl acrylate 34.5 Methyl methacrylate 32.5 Ethyl acrylate 16.5 Methacrylic acid 16.5 polymerized in the presence of 4% of sulfonated polyesterL 18 Butyl acrylate 34.5 Methyl methacrylate 32.5 Ethyl acrylate 16.5 Methacrylic acid 16.5 polymerized in the presence of 8% of sulfonated polyester______________________________________
During the tests, the products are added to the medium at a pH such that they remain in suspension form (addition at the third rinsing). The solubilization of the latex takes place only at the subsequent washing (in which the pH increaes).
The composition of the formula used is as follows:
______________________________________TPP 21.5%Neutral pyrophosphate 2%Anhydrous neutral trisodiumphosphate 0.5%3Na silicate (Na.sub.2 SiO.sub.3) 8.6%3Na stearate (CH.sub.3 --(CH.sub.2).sub.16 COONa) 3.0%TINOPAL DMSX .RTM. 0.2%TINOPAL SOP .RTM. 0.2%ESPERASE NOVO .RTM. 0.3%Perborate (Liquid air) 25.0%EDTA 0.2%Neutral LABS 7.0%CEMULSOL 6/18 .RTM. 2.5%CEMULSOL LA 90 .RTM. 2.5%Na sulfate 24%______________________________________
During each group of tests, the test products (one to three) are compared with a test in the absence of additive. The results obtained are given in the following table:
______________________________________ Additive andDetergent concentration Recovery R %concent. in the bath PE/C PE Observations______________________________________ none 46.5 10.97.5 g/l latex L.sub.8 100 100 ppm 47.0 13.5 added at the 3rd rinsing none 42.9 14.87.5 g/l latex L.sub.12 100 ppm 56.8 18.7 added at the 3rd rinsing latex L.sub.13 100 ppm 60.1 23.7 latex L.sub.14 100 ppm 60.6 25.8 added at the 3rd rinsing none 47.1 12.17.5 g/l latex L.sub.9 100 ppm 56.6 20.5 added at the 3rd rinsing latex L.sub.10 100 ppm 61.3 24.2 latex L.sub.11 100 ppm 56.6 21.0 added at the 3rd rinsing none 35.3 77.5 g/l latex L.sub.8 100 ppm 48.5 26.6 added at the 3rd rinsing______________________________________
The results confrim the antisoiling effect of the different test alkali-soluble latices.
EXAMPLE 6
This example illustrates the use of a few alkali-soluble latices at variable concentrations. The experimental conditions are the same as for Example 5. The results obtained are recorded in the following table:
______________________________________ Additive andDetergent concentration Recovery R %concent. in the bath PE/C PE Observations______________________________________ none 34.8 14.87.5 g/l latex L.sub.14 46.5 16.6 added at the 20 ppm 3rd rinsing none 35.9 13.17.5 g/l latex L.sub.14 40.3 17.8 added at the 40 ppm 3rd rinsing none 27.87.5 g/l latex L.sub.4 39.0 added at the 60 ppm 3rd rinsing none 34.0 13.87.5 g/l latex L.sub.4 45.5 18.1 added at the 80 ppm 3rd rinsing none 35.6 17.97.5 g/l latex L.sub.13 43.6 23.6 added at the 40 ppm 3rd rinsing______________________________________
These results confirm the antisoiling effect of the alkali-soluble latices for several additive concentrations.
EXAMPLE 7
The object of the test used in the course of the examples which follow is to assess the anti-redeposition properties of a given additive.
The method used consists in washing samples of fabrics in the presence of the test additive and of soiling deposited on cotton rovings. The results obtained reflect the affinity of the textiles conditioned in this manner for a soiling. The experimental conditions are as follows:
Fabrics
______________________________________Cotton 405Polyester cotton (PE/C) 7404 Source: TESTFABRICPolyester "Dacron 54" (PE)______________________________________
Equipment
HANAU Linitest (2 pots per test) (automated tergotometer)
Each Linitest pot contains:
10 stainless steel balls 12 mm in diameter
4 cotton rectangles (10.times.12 cm) equivalent to
4 PE/C rectangles (10.times.12 cm), 20 g of fabric
4 polyester rectangles (10.times.12 cm)
300 ml of detergent solution
Bath ratio 1:15.
Operating Conditions
Washing temperature: 60.degree. C.
Washing time: 40 min (25 min of temperature rise and 15 min at 60.degree. C.)
Dilution: addition of 150 ml of cold hard water followed by 5 min of agitation
3 5-min rinsings in the presence of 400 ml of cold hard water
Water hardness (33.degree. TH)
Drying of the fabrics by passing them twice in succession through a photographic glazer
Measurement reflectance of: GARDNER photometer filter Y, 4 thicknesses of fabric.
Soiling
"Spangler" (sebum+particles)
Operating Procedure
Conditioning: a washing cycle is performed in the presence of the test additive and a soiling impregnated on cotton rovings. The additive can be introduced either into the detergent bath or during rinsing.
Measurement of the reflectance of the stained fabrics (GARDNER, filter Y).
Washing: the procedure is the same as for the conditioning but in the absence of additive. Each Linitest pot thus contains two stained samples and two unstained samples of each grade of fabric.
Measurement of the reflectance after washing (GARDNER, filter Y). The reflectance of the stained fabrics indicates the anti-redeposition effect.
Expression of the Results
The results relating to the anti-redeposition of the soiling are expressed in the form of the value of the difference delta R in reflectance before and after washing, and the efficiency E: ##EQU2## R.sub.2 =reflectance of the soiled fabrics after washing, R.sub.0 =reflectance of the fabric before washing,
R.sub.1 =reflectance of the unwashed blank fabric.
The lower the recovery delta R, the greater the efficiency of the additive as an anti-redeposition agent.
The object of this example is to demonstrate the anti-redeposition effect of an alkali-soluble latex in the presence of a formula in which the builder or washing assistant consists of tripolyphosphate (TPP) and zeolite 4A.
The composition of the formula used is as follows:
______________________________________TPP 19.0%Zeolite 17.0%Na sulfate 9.5%Neutral pyrophosphate 2.0%Anhydrous Na.sub.3 PO.sub.4 0.5%3Na silicate (Na.sub.2 SiO.sub.3) 8.6%BLANOSE BWS 1.5%TINOPAL DMSX .RTM. 0.2%TINOPAL SOD .RTM. 0.2%ESPERASE NOVO .RTM. 0.3%Perborate 25.0%Na stearate 3.0%LABS 7.0%CEMULSOL 6/18 .RTM. 2.5%CEMULSOL LA 90 .RTM. 2.5%EDTA 0.2%H.sub.2 0 1.0%______________________________________
This example illustrates the use of different latices at a concentration of 100 ppm in a detergent formula having a bath concentration of 6 g/l.
______________________________________ Polyester/cotton PolyesterAdditive Delta R E % Delta R E %______________________________________none 20 -- 36L.sub.9 11 36 21 38 19 28 24 38L.sub.10 13 41 24 36L.sub.11 0 100 1 97 0 100 4 90L.sub.12 5 73 11 66 9 65 16 59L.sub.13 -1 106 1 97 0 100 1 97L.sub.14 1 94 1 97 12 54 20 49L.sub.15 6 73 16 59 1 94 4 87L.sub.16 5 69 1 97 -1 106 0 100L.sub.17 -1 104 7 82L.sub.18 -1 104 3 91______________________________________

Number	Date	Country	Kind
86 18471	Dec 1986	FRX
87 07279	May 1987	FRX

Number	Name	Date	Kind
3782898	Mandell, Jr.	Jan 1974
4711740	Carter et al.	Dec 1987

Number	Date	Country
201079	Sep 1986	JPX
2104091	Mar 1983	GBX

Antisoiling and anti-redeposition latices for the aqueous washing of textile articles

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (2)

US Referenced Citations (2)

Foreign Referenced Citations (2)