In order to promote clarity in the description, common terminology for components is used. The use of a specific term for a component suitable for carrying out some purpose within the disclosed invention should be construed as including all technical equivalents which operate to achieve the same purpose, whether or not the internal operation of the named component and the alternative component use the same principles. The use of such specificity to provide clarity should not be misconstrued as limiting the scope of the disclosure to the named component unless the limitation is made explicit in the description or the claims that follow.
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to coin mechanisms, particularly to those that are mechanical in nature, employing rotary coin recognition techniques. Typical rotary coin mechanisms use levers to recognize the lack of a coin of appropriate size. The lack of a coin of the appropriate size prevents sufficient rotation of the rotary coin mechanism to trigger the vending of the requested good or service.
2. Description of Prior Art
In machines using mechanical rotary coin mechanisms, upon insertion of the proper coinage, the cam of the device is rotated, and the coin's movement internal to the device moves the coin detection levers out of the way, allowing for complete rotation of the cam and dispensing the vended product. Incorrect coinage will not move the coin detection levers out of the way to allow the cam to rotate, and no product is vended. Rotary coin mechanisms have been known in the art for a number of decades.
The environment for the rotary coin mechanism is illustrated in
There are advantages to using a mechanical rotary coin mechanism as these devices offer relatively reliable service and work without electricity. Many machines use multiple rotary coin mechanisms. For example a machine may have one mechanism per row per item with many rows for multiple items. The use of multiple mechanical coin mechanisms means that the machine will continue to accept coins and vend at least some products if some of the mechanical coin mechanisms are still in service. This is an advantage over vending machines using a single electronic coin mechanism where a failure of the single mechanism prevents sale of any vending items until the coin mechanism is repaired or replaced.
A problem with these mechanical rotary coin mechanisms is the ability to defeat the lever and stop method of coin recognition with simple tools, such as paper clips or firm wires. Use of these simple tools upon the rotary coin mechanism will allow products to be vended without inserting the proper coinage. A vending machine that provides product without receiving the proper coins is not appropriate for use in an unsupervised location where thieves may steal the vended product.
The fully mechanical coin mechanism assembly is typically constructed of injection-molded plastic and glass reinforced parts for durability and ease of operation. These parts are designed for long reliability and simple usage, and should not fade, chip, or crack under normal usage. Mechanical coin mechanisms have distinct advantages over electronic coin mechanisms. Mechanical coin mechanisms require no electricity, allowing the devices to be used in places where power outlets are unavailable. Many vending or services machines have multiple coin mechanisms per machine, allowing for the instance when one coin mechanism is jammed or broken, all other mechanisms on the machine should still be fully functional, and the machine still generates revenue. Mechanical rotary coin mechanisms are essentially simple to disassemble, program, and reassemble, and do not require training in repairs of electrical devices.
To prepare a rotary coin mechanism for use in a vending machine, it must first be disassembled, and reassembled, programmed to the desired cost of the product to be dispensed or service requested. There are many different models of rotary coin mechanisms, programmable from five cents to several dollars, working on the same rotary principles.
The prior art design can be better explained through the use of
As shown in
As best shown in the exploded assembly drawing contained in
The back of the rotary coin mechanism 100 includes a rear housing 316 that is held to the rest of the rotary coin mechanism by a set of screws. Outside of the rear housing 316 is a ratchet 320, pawl 324 and pawl spring 328. Pressure from the pawl spring 328 pushes the pawl extension 332 to keep the pawl 324 engaged with the ratchet to prevent rotation of the rotary handle 112 against the pawl 324. A rotary coin mechanism protrusion 336 is connected to the ratchet and the rotary handle protrusions 304 so that the rotary coin mechanism protrusion rotates with the rotary handle to engage with other components of the vending machine to cause the vended item to be delivered. (rest of vending machine not shown).
The detector detents 504, which are under spring pressure, stop rotation by interacting with the empty coin slot 208 that would normally be occupied by a coin (
The location and depth of the coin slots on the coin discs are such that improper coin insertion will not cause the detector detent 504 to move sufficiently out of the way to allow the assembly to rotate past the detector detent 504. Thus the assembly is blocked from making a full rotation and the product or service is not provided. For example, a dime inserted into the quarter slot will sit too low in the rotating disc to encounter the detector detent 504 lever and push the detector detent 504 out of the way. The same is true attempting to use a nickel in a quarter sized coin slot, or even a dime or penny inserted into the nickel sized coin slot.
The detector detent is shown blocking rotation in
The rotary coin mechanism 100 detailed in
In order to program the rotary coin mechanism to the correct value, the programmer adjusts the coin discs 204, filler disc 308, detector detents 504 and spacers (not shown) internal to the device casing. As an example, to program the device to require thirty-five cents, the programmer would start by removing all coin discs 204, filler discs 308, detector detents 504 and spacers (not shown). The first disc would be placed over the handle protrusion 304 (
This is accomplished by placing a coin disc 204 on top of the last filler disc 308 set to the ten-cent position (the smallest coin). The next filler disc 308 is then inserted rotated from the accepting position into a rejecting position. The rejecting position aligns a tab on the filler disc that overlaps the opening of the coin disc's ten-cent opening, preventing the insertion of a coin. As the tabs are on the front face of the filler discs 308, they are not visible in the drawings. The programming to reject a coin would then be repeated to fill the fourth and final coin slot.
Once the coin discs have been properly programmed, the rotary coin mechanism 100 must then be adjusted for coin detection. This is accomplished through use of the detector detents 504 (
Unfortunately, in the prior art design, the coin slots 208 also present an opportunity to defeat the rotary coin mechanism.
For vending items that require more than one coin to vend, then the process described above would be done for each of the coin discs requiring a coin.
With the existing rotary coin mechanism being used in a great number and variety of vending machines, many people come in contact with this device. The fact that the prior art coin mechanism can be easily defeated, and the details on how to defeat this coin mechanism are rapidly becoming common knowledge. A coin mechanism that is easily defeated with readily available tools renders very expensive vending machines or other service machines unprofitable to operate in areas without close supervision.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to prevent the maintained presence of a theft tool in the casing during rotation of the rotary coin mechanism to prevent interference with the coin detection system and thus prevent this type of theft of vending products.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved rotary coin mechanism that is resistant to attempts to distort the shape of the mechanism by “flexing” the mechanism as part of an attempt to obtain product without insertion of the appropriate coins.
It is further object to provide a solution that can be used to upgrade or replace existing rotary coin mechanisms by designing an improved coin mechanism that is compatible with existing rotary coin mechanisms.
These and other advantages of the present invention are apparent from the drawings and the detailed description that follows.
The present invention is directed to an apparatus that satisfies the need to prevent thieves from using a simple tool to defeat the rotary coin mechanism in order to receive product without proper payment.
As the problem is the insertion of tools into the rotary coin mechanism, a conventional approach to the solution would be to attempt to block the insertion of the tool into the coin mechanism. This is a difficult task given the large amount of clearance available for tool insertion as an empty coin slot is rotated into the leading edge of the casing.
The present invention is based on the recognition that the solution to this problem is not in preventing the insertion of a theft tool, but the prevention of the continued presence of the inserted theft tool as the rotary coin mechanisms rotates through past the coin detector. Thus, the solution is to force the removal of the inserted theft tool before the rotary coin mechanism rotates beyond the scrutiny of the coin detector.
The present invention can be used to upgrade or replace the prior art coin mechanism that is widely used in industry where automated dispensing or services exist. As described above, the prior art rotary coin mechanism consists of a set of one or more coin discs that rotate about a central cam. An example of such a mechanism is the rotary coin mechanism available from Edina Technical Products, Inc. of Plymouth Minn. (www.edinatech.com).
The present invention is an improved rotary coin mechanism with coin discs having tabs located near the trailing edges of the one or more coin slots present on each coin disc. The tabs shaped to prevent the continued presence of a theft tool in the casing of the rotary coin mechanism during the rotation of the relevant coin slot past the coin detector. The tabs are shaped so that the tab can pass by the coin detector. For retrofit applications, the tabs are sized so that they can be slid onto the stack of components without interference from the casing or other components. In one preferred embodiment, the leading edge of the coin detector casing is reinforced with an external brace to reduce the potential for a thief to distort the shape of the casing in an attempt to extend the amount of coin disc rotation before the theft tool must be removed.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown.
This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
The present invention thwarts the use of a tool to interfere with the operation of the detector detent through the use of one or more modifications.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that the size, shape, and placement of the tabs may be modified somewhat. For example, the tab may not need to start at the edge of the coin slot as long as it is near enough to the trailing edge of the coin slot to serve the purpose of preventing the maintained presence of a tool to interfere with the coin detection process. Likewise, the shape of the tab could be different from that shown in
Within limits, a longer tab provides a greater obstacle to the maintenance of the theft tool. However, when retrofitting existing rotary coin mechanisms with new coin discs 904, there are limits on the maximum length of the tabs as the coin discs are assembled in a stack on the handle protrusions 304. Thus, tabs that must pass through grooves in the casing (as described below) must be placed in such a way that they can be stacked without having to interact during stacking with the grooved portions of the casing.
The leading edge of the tab will come in contact with the coin detector. It is important that the leading edge of the tab be shaped to allow the coin detector to ride up the tab rather than obstruct rotation of the coin disc as the coin detector interacts with an inappropriately shaped leading edge. While the leading edges shown in
As indicated in
As it is important to reduce the size of the gap so that a tool cannot be inserted and maintained during rotation, it may be important to reinforce the rotary coin device casing so that the casing cannot be distorted or flexed to change the gap. Thus
The brace 920 may not be necessary if the casing of the rotary coin mechanism is manufactured of a material sufficiently resistive to attempts to flex the casing such that the casing cannot be readily flexed to allow a tool to interfere with the operation of the detector detents 504 despite the addition of the tab or tabs.
The rotary coin mechanisms are mounted on vending machines in many different configurations. The rotary coin mechanisms may be mounted upright on the front of the vending machines 1104 for dispensing of vending items 1124 stored inside the vending machine 1104. These products are vended through openings on the front of the vending machine. The rotary coin mechanisms can also be mounted on the side of the vending machine at varying angles to allow vending of products stored in rows across the front of the vending machine. These products may be vended by attaching a large coil 1112 to the rotary coin mechanism. Product to be vended 1124 would be inserted in between the turns of the large coils. Turning the rotary coin mechanism cam 360 degrees causes the coil 1112 to also rotate 360 degrees, and force the product inserted in the last loop of the coil to become free of the coil, and drop into a channel. This vertical channel would drop the vended product into an open chamber at the bottom of the vending machine, from which the buyer would retrieve the product.
The existing rotary coin mechanisms are mostly attached to vending machines in rows or columns. In some cases one rotary coin mechanism can be used to vend several different vending machines items. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,337,876 for a Counter-Top Vending Machine.
Each unique rotary coin mechanism is secured to the vending machine with several mounting screws. The rows or columns of rotary coin mechanisms are then secured by a cover plate that prohibits access to the rotary coin mechanism's mounting screws. These cover plates have very tight clearance tolerances over the rotary coin mechanisms. The improved coin mechanism must have the same external dimensions as the prior art coin mechanism in order to be compatible with these existing cover plates, and assure backwards compatibility with the multitude of existing rotary coin mechanisms.
In addition to the variations and alternative embodiments suggested above, it may be worth mentioning that the present invention is not limited to coin discs with one or three coin slots. These examples were used in keeping with common practice in the United States. Tabs can be added in accordance with the teachings of the present invention to a single coin slot or to two or more coin slots as is useful for the coinage of a particular country.
The teachings of the present invention can be used in a rotary coin mechanism that uses only one, two or three coin discs or uses more than the four coin disc mechanism used as an example above.
The teachings of the present invention can be employed in other rotary coin mechanisms that have alterative means for detecting the presence of an appropriate coin. The precise detector detent, post, and detector spring system is useful for explaining the problem and solution but is not required for the implementation of the invention. The invention can be applied to any rotary coin mechanism that can be defeated by inserting a tool into the interior of the rotary coin mechanism through an empty coin slot and holding the tool in place during the rotation of the rotary coin mechanism to defeat the coin detection system from stopping the vending of product or service for failure to insert the appropriately sized coin. An implementation of the present invention to prevent the defeat of a photo beam based coin detector could be within the scope of the present invention if the requisite claim elements are all present.
While the rotary coin mechanisms tend to be designed to operate exclusively on the manual rotation of the rotary handle and connected assembly, the invention does not require an absence of other means. Thus, for example, a rotary coin mechanism with electrical components could be within the scope of the present invention if the requisite claim elements were all present.
While the explanation of the operation of the rotary coin mechanism has used a rotary coin mechanism that rotates clockwise (viewed from the front) 360 degrees to vend the product, it is not necessary that the rotation be clockwise as opposed to counter clockwise or that the necessary amount of rotation is 360 degrees. Those of ordinary skill in the art can create rotary coin mechanisms that must rotate some other amount.
In fact, those skilled in the art will recognize that the methods and apparatus of the present invention have many applications and that the present invention is not limited to the specific examples given to promote understanding of the present invention. Moreover, the scope of the present invention covers the range of variations, modifications, and substitutes for the system components described herein, as would be known to those of skill in the art.
The legal limitations of the scope of the claimed invention are set forth in the claims that follow and extend to cover their legal equivalents. Those unfamiliar with the legal tests for equivalency should consult a person registered to practice before the patent authority which granted this patent such as the United States Patent and Trademark Office or its counterpart.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional patent application No. 60/391,764 filed on Jun. 26, 2002 for Antitheft Design for Rotary Coin Mechanisms.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
683280 | Hofheimer | Sep 1901 | A |
1047651 | Kaighn | Dec 1912 | A |
1160557 | Wilton | Nov 1915 | A |
2537317 | Probasco | Jan 1951 | A |
3010557 | Weitzman | Nov 1961 | A |
3227257 | Probasco | Jan 1966 | A |
3604547 | Bolen | Sep 1971 | A |
3970181 | Rubio | Jul 1976 | A |
4131190 | Gitlin | Dec 1978 | A |
4350239 | Tsuiki | Sep 1982 | A |
4673074 | McCormick | Jun 1987 | A |
4702392 | Rachman | Oct 1987 | A |
5234093 | Abe et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5337876 | McGee et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5383545 | Schwarzli | Jan 1995 | A |
5657848 | Schwarzli | Aug 1997 | A |
5950793 | Schwarzli | Sep 1999 | A |
5954181 | Schwarzli | Sep 1999 | A |
5996841 | Marrocco | Dec 1999 | A |
6076650 | Schwarzli | Jun 2000 | A |
6253900 | Watanabe | Jul 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040003979 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60391764 | Jun 2002 | US |