This invention relates to antiviral compounds and compositions useful for the treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)
4′-Ethynyl-2-fluoro-2′-deoxyadenosine(EFdA) (MK-8591) represented by Formula I:
is a nucleoside analog effective as an inhibitor of nucleoside reverse transcriptase (Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 2018, 13, 294-299) and useful as an antiretroviral in the treatment and pre exposure prophylaxis of a HIV-1 infection. EFdA is metabolized in cells to an active triphosphate anabolite (EFdA-TP), which inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase.
EFdA, however, has a relatively high water solubility and relatively short time course of plasma concentration. As a result EFdA can provide only limited duration of viral suppression when administered to a patient for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or for pre-exposure prophylaxis. Accordingly, there exists a need for formulations that can extend duration of viral suppression after administration. The compounds and pharmaceutical preparations of the present invention satisfy that need.
Antiviral compounds of the present invention are diesters of EFdA and have limited solubility in water. Whereas EFdA has an aqueous solubility of 0.877 mg/mL at physiological pH, the present diesters of EFdA have an aqueous solubility of less than 0.03 mg/mL at physiological pH, preferably less than 0.002 mg/mL. These diesters of EFdA are crystalline, are useful for providing an extended duration of suppression of HIV, and can be administered parenterally as a suspension in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. A preferred prophylactic dose for a human subject is in the range of about 80 mg to about 800 mg of the EFdA diester administered parenterally at about six-month intervals in a dose volume of about 0.5 to about 4 milliliters per dose. A preferred treatment dose for a human patient is in the range of about 80 mg to about 800 mg of the EFdA disester administered parenterally at about three-month intervals in a dose volume of about 0.5 to about 4 milliliters per dose
Parenteral formulations containing and antiviral compound of the present invention can be dry formulations comprising the antiviral compound together with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients or stable suspensions of the antiviral compound in an aqueous or oil-based medium.
In the drawings,
Extended in vivo viral suppression is achieved by diesters represented by Formula (II):
wherein R1 and R2 independently are —C(═O)R3 and R3 and R is a member of the group consisting of isopropyl, 3-pentyl, cyclopentyl and phenylmethyl. The foregoing diesters are prepared by reacting EFdA with the desired acid or acid anhydride and recovering the diester as a crystalline compound. The Examples below illustrate preparation of the preferred diesters.
To a mixture of EFdA (Compound 1) (3 g, 6.8 mmol, equiv.), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (499 mg, 2.73 in mmol, 0.4 equiv.) in anhydrous dimethyl formamide (DMF) (100 mL) isobutyric acid (8.4 g, 27.3 mmol, 6 equiv.) was added dropwise at ambient temperature. The reaction stirred for 5 h at room temperature. The reaction was monitored by LC-MS due to the occasional alkylation of NH2 group observed for elongated reaction time. The reaction mixture was then filtered to remove byproduct urea. Acetonitrile was used to rinse the reaction mixture. Thereafter, the reaction mixture was washed twice with water and once with brine and then the solvent was dried, filtered and evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude material was purified by silica-gel column chromatography using 60-70% ethyl acetate (EtOAc) in hexanes to obtain Compound 2 as a glassy solid. The obtained glassy solid was dispersed in minimum amount of isopropanol followed by its rotatory evaporation to obtain pure Compound 2 as a white solid (2.5 g, 85% yield). LC-MS (ESI+): m/z 434.49 [M+H]+.
About 250 mg/g of Compound 2 was suspended in aqueous 0 25% CMC-Na/0.5% TWEEN-80 (26 gauge syringeability) and was subjected to stability for 2 weeks at 40° C./75% relative humidity.
To a mixture of EFdA (1 g, 3.4 mmol, 1 equiv.), 2-ethylbutanoic anhydride (4.4 g, 20.4 mmol, 6 equiv.), triethanolamine (TEA) (3.8 mL, 27.2 mmol, 8 equiv.) in anhydrous acetonitrile (MeCN) (43 mL) and cooled to 0° C. was added 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (83 mg, 0.68 mmol, 0.2 equiv.) at 0° C. The resulting admixture was stirred for 0.5 h at 0° C. and then for 5 h at room temperature. The reaction was monitored by LC-MS due to the occasional alkylation of NH2 group observed for elongated reaction time. The reaction mixture was quenched with methanol, and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude material was purified by silica-gel column chromatography using 60-70% ethyl acetate (EtOAc) in hexanes to obtain Compound 3 as a glassy solid. The obtained glassy solid was dispersed in minimum amount of isopropanol followed by its rotatory evaporation to obtain pure Compound 3 as a white solid (1.33 g, 80% yield). LC-MS (ESI+): m/z 490.56 [M+H]+.
Compound 4 was prepared by using the procedure followed for the Compound 2 but using cyclopentanoic acid instead of isoutyric acid. LC-MS (ESI+): m/z 486.44 [M+H]+.
To a mixture of EFdA (499 mg, 1.7 mmol, 1 equiv.), 2-phenylacetic anhydride (2.6 g, 10.2 mmol, 6 equiv.), triethanolamine (TEA) (1.9 mL, 13.6 mmol, 8 equiv.) in anhydrous acetonitrile (MeCN) (22 mL) and cooled to 0° ° C. was added 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (42 mg, 0.34 mmol, 0.2 equiv.) at 0° C. The reaction stirred for 0.5 h at 0° C. and then to 3 h at room temperature. The reaction is monitored by LC-MS due to the occasional alkylation of NH2 group observed for elongated reaction time. The reaction mixture was quenched with methanol and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude material was purified by silica-gel column chromatography using 60-70% ethyl acetate (EtOAc) in hexanes to obtain Compound 5 as a glassy solid. The obtained glassy solid was dispersed in minimum amount of isopropanol followed by its rotatory evaporation to obtain pure Compound 5 as a white solid (694 mg, 77% yield). LC-MS (ESI+): m/z 530.52 [M+H]+.
Table 1 presents compound characterization data obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
Compound 6 was prepared by using the procedure similar to that used for Compound 2 using 4.5 equiv of corresponding acid. LC-MS (ESI+): m/z 502.41 [M+H]+. About 275 mg/g of Compound 6 was suspended in aqueous 0.25% CMC-Na/0.5% TWEEN-80 (26 gauge syringeability) and was subjected to stability for 2 weeks at 40° C./75% relative humidity.
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.34 (s, 1H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.87 (s, 1H), 6.35 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (dd, J = 11.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 1H), 3.18 (dt, J = 13.6, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.69-2.57 (m, 2H), 1.2- 1.1 (m, 6H), 1.08-0.98 (m, 6H). MS-ESI: m/z 434.49 observed (M + H)+ Anal calcd for C20H24FN5O5: C, 55.42; H, 5.58; N, 16.16. Found: C, 55.48; H, 5.73; N, 15.94 Aqueous solubility (pH 7.4): 0.028 mg/mL
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.35 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 39.8 Hz, 2H), 6.35 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (dd, J = 11.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (dd, J = 11.7, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 1H), 3.20 (dt, J = 13.5, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.61 (dt, J = 13.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (ddd, J = 8.3, 5.6, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 2.13 (tt, J = 8.9, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 1.72-1.31 (m, 8H), 0.88 (td, J = 7.5, 2.3 Hz, 6H), 0.80-0.66 (m, 6H). MS-ESI: m/z 490.56 observed (M + H)+ Aqueous solubility (pH 7.4): <0.002 mg/mL
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.34 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 36.1 Hz, 2H), 6.34 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (dt, J = 11.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (dd, J =11.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 1H), 3.18 (dt, J = 13.9, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.90-2.78 (m, 1H), 2.74-2.57 (m, 2H), 1.93-1.44 (m, 16H). MS-ESI: m/z 486.44 observed (M + H)+ Aqueous solubility (pH 7.4): <0.001 mg/mL
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.31 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 37.3 Hz, 2H), 7.39-7.12 (m, 10H), 6.35 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.71 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H), 4.25 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 3.88-3.71 (m, 3H), 3.63 (q, J = 15.8 Hz, 2H), 3.11 (dt, J = 14.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (dt, J = 12.5, 6.4 Hz, 1H). MS-ESI: m/z 530.52 observed (M + H)+ Aqueous solubility (pH 7.4): <0.002 mg/mL
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.38 (s, 1H), 8.09 (dt, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 8.02-7.83 (m, 4H), 7.76-7.68 (m, 1H), 7.66 (td, J = 7.4, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (td, J = 7.6, 7.1, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 7.53-7.44 (m, 2H), 6.54 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 6.16-6.08 (m, 1H), 4.72 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 1H), 3.41-3.32 (m, 1H), 2.85 (dt, J = 13.4, 6.3 Hz, 1H). MS-ESI: m/z 502.41 observed (M + H)+ Aqueous solubility (pH 7.4): <0.002 mg/mL
The foregoing discussion and the Examples are illustrative, and ace not to be taken as limiting. Still other variants within the spirit landscape of this invention are possible and will readily present themselves to those skilled in the art.
Compound 2 (˜200 mg) was completely dissolved in minimum quantity of acetone with stirring. This was followed by slow evaporation of the solvents at ambient temperature. This resulted in a recrystallized sample as a white powder. Other solvents including ethyl acetate, methanol and tetrahydrofuran can also be used.
All formulation protocols generated a stable aqueous suspension with 26-gauge syringeability.
EFdA was ground and sieved through a #80 sieve. A solution of preformed 0.25% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Sodium CMC) & 0.1% polyoxyethlene (20) sorbitan monooleate (TWEEN-80) was added to about 300 mg of EFdA (Compound 1) to provide a suspension of about 1 grain (300 mg of ±˜700 mg of polymer solution) of the final formulation (about 300 mg/g). The suspension was then bath sonicated for 10 min in an ice bath. The density of formulation of was 1.064 g/mL and provided a 319.2 mg/mL concentration of EFdA.
Recrystallized Compound 2 was ground and sieved through No. 80 sieve U.S. Standard Sieve Series, for Wire Cloth Screens (nominal sieve opening 0.180 mm). 250 mg of Compound 2 was taken in suitable container and a solution of preformed 0.25% Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and 0.1% TWEEN-80 was added to obtain 1 gram (250 mg of Compound 2+˜750 mg, of polymer solution) of the final formulation (˜250 mg/g) The suspension was then probe sonicated for 5 min in an ice bath (Sonication time: 5 min; Pulse Amplitude: 20; Pulse on Time: 30 sec; Pulse off time: 20 sec).
Compound 3 was ground and sieved through No. 80 sieves U.S. Standard Sieve Series for Wire Cloth Screens (nominal sieve opening 0.180 mm). 250 mg of Compound 3 was taken in suitable container and a solution of preformed 0.25% Sodium GMC and 0.5% TWEEN-80 was added to obtain 1 gram (250 mg of Compound 3+˜750 mg of polymer solution) of the final suspension (˜250 mg/g). The suspension was then probe sonicated for 5 min in an ice bath (Sonication time: 5 min; Pulse Amplitude: 20; Pulse on Time: 30 sec; Pulse off time: 20 sec). The density of the suspension was of is 1.004 g/mL. The above Suspension contained 250.88 mg/mL. of Compound 3 (˜150 mg/mL of EFdA).
Compound 5 was ground and sieved through No. 80 sieve U.S. Standard Sieve Series for Wire Cloth Screens (nominal sieve opening 0.180 mm), 200 mg of Compound 5 was placed in a suitable container and a solution of preformed 0.25% Sodium CMC and 0.5% TWEEN-80 was added to obtain 1 gram (200 mg of Compound 5+˜800 mg of polymer solution) of the final suspension (˜200 mg/g). The suspension was then probe sonicated for 5 min in an ice bath (Sonication time: 5 min; Pulse Amplitude: 20; Pulse on Time: 30 sec; Pulse off time: 20 sec). The density of the suspension was 1.047 g/mL. The above suspension contained 209.4 mg/mL of Compound 5 (˜115.97 mg/mL of EFdA).
Animals: Animals (Male SD rats ˜200-250 g and Male rhesus macaques ˜2-3 kg) were obtained from an approved vendor (SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China and/or Topgene Biotechnology, Wuhan city, Hubei Province, China).
Acclimation/Quarantine: Following arrival, animals were assessed as to their general health by a member of the veterinary staff Of other authorized personnel. Animals were acclimated for at least 3 days before being placed on study.
Animal Husbandry: Animals were group housed during acclimation and individually housed during the study. The animal room environment will be controlled (target conditions: temperature 18 to 26° C., relative humidity 30 to 70%, 12 hours artificial light and 12 hours dark). Temperature and relative humidity were monitored daily.
Animal Cannulation: No
Animals were fasted at least 12 hours prior to the administration. All animals had access to Certified Rodent and non-Rodent Diet (Catalog # M01-F, SLAC Laboratory Animal Cl. Ltd., Shanghai, China) ad libitum 4 hours post dosing. Water was autoclaved before provided to the animals ad libitum. Periodic analyses of the water was performed and the results archived. There were no known contaminants in the diet or water that, at the levels of detection, were expected to interfere with the purpose, conduct or outcome of the study.
SC Formulation: Suspensions were prepared on the day of dosing according to the procedure described in Examples 2-5 above, and Tables 2-4. Animals were dosed within four hours of suspension preparation. Two 20 μL aliquots of each prepared suspension were transferred into 1.5 mL of polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes and dose validation was run by LC/UV or LC-MS/MS.
The suspensions were administered via subcutaneous injection (SC) following facility standard operations procedures (SOPs).
Approximately 200 μL blood was collected from saphenous vein at each time point for rats and 0.5 mL for rhesus macaques. All blood samples were transferred into microcentrifuge tubes containing 4 μL of K2EDTA (0.5M) as anti-coagulant and placed on wet ice until processed for plasma.
Blood: Blood samples were processed for plasma by centrifugation at approximately 4° C., 3000 g 15 min within half an hour of collection. Plasma samples was stored in polypropylene tubes, quick frozen over dry ice and kept at −70±10° C. until LC/MS/MS analysis.
Plasma concentration versus time data was analyzed by non-compartmental approaches using the Phoenix WinNonlin 6.3 software program. Cmax, Tmax, T1/2, AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf), MRT(0-t), MRT(0-inf), % F and graphs of plasma concentration versus time profile were generated.
Several prodrugs including EFdA (1) as a control were subjected to a single dose rat PK studies via subcutaneous route of administration. All animals were injected with equivalent doses of 10 mg/kg and concentration of 4 mg/mL of EFdA as an aqueous suspension in 0.5% CMC-Na and 0.5% TWEEN-80. While similar exposure was observed, all compounds 2, 3 and 5 exhibited plasma levels of EFdA above lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for more than a week with Cmax much lower than for EFdA.
Table 2 shows the rat PK data for Compounds 1, 2, 3 and 5 following subcutaneous (SC administration at 10 mg/kg equivalent dose of EFdA. The data in graphic form are shown in
After optimization, SC rat PK studies were performed again with high equivalent dose of 100 mg/kg at equivalent concentration of 120 mg/mL for Compound 3, 116 mg/mL for Compound 5 and 319 mg/mL of EFdA, respectively. Compound 3 provided a delayed and 100-fold lower Cmax than EFdA. Enhanced half life and mean residence life were also observed, making Compound 3 and Compound 5 suitable for prophylaxis.
Table 3A and Table 3B show the rat PK data for Compounds 1, 3 and 5 following SC administration. The data for Compound 3 are shawl n graphic form in
After rat PK, analysis, the focus was shifted to non-rodents, i.e., rhesus macaque. Compound 5 and EFdA were subjected to a single dose rhesus macaque PK studies via subcutaneous route of administration with equivalent doses of 50 mg/kg of EFdA. The aqueous suspensions contained 0.25% CMC-Na and 0.1%/0.5% TWEEN-80 with equivalent concentration of 116 mg/mL and 319 mg/mL of EFdA for Compound 5 and EFdA respectively. With Compound 5 plasma levels of EFdA above LLOQ for more than a month with 24-fold lower Cmax than EFdA itself were observed.
Table 4 shows the Rhesus PK data for Compounds 1 and 5 following SC administration at 50 mg/kg equivalent dose of EFdA. The data are shown in graphic form in
Suspending medium for the present compounds can be an aqueous vehicle such water for injection (WFI) or a vegetable oil vehicle such as sesame oil, olive oil, and the like. The suspending medium can also contain pharmaceutically acceptable excipients such as non-ionic surfactant, suspending or flocculating agent, preservatives, buffers, toxicity adjusters, chelating agents, antioxidants, and the like.
For prophylaxis, a preferred prophylactic dose for a human subject is in the range of about 80 mg to about 800 mg of the antiviral compound administered parenterally at about six-month (semi-annual) intervals in a dose volume of about 0.5 to about 4 milliliters (mL) per dose.
For treatment of a human patient, the effective amount of the antiviral compound of this invention preferably ranges from about 80 mg to about 800 mg at a dose volume of about 0.5 to about 4 mL per dose, more preferably an effective amount in the range of about 200 to about 400 mg, for a three-month dosage regimen. The dosage regimen can vary, however, depending on the time interval between administered doses in a particular dosing regimen.
The term “effective amount” as used herein and in the claims means an amount of the antiviral compound sufficient to inhibit HIV reverse transcriptase, inhibit HIV replication, exert a prophylactic effect and/or exert a therapeutic effect after administration.
The term “administration” and variants thereof, for example “administering compound”, with reference to the claimed method of treatment means providing the antiviral compound to the patient and includes self-administration as well as administration to the patient by another person.
Preferably, the parenteral suspensions suitable for injection contain the present antiviral compound in an amount in the range of about 3 to 45 percent by weight, based on the weight of the suspension. Preferred particle size is no greater than about 50 micrometers (μm), more preferably an average particle size in the range of about 6 μm to about 1.5 μm.
Preferred flocculating or suspending agents are linear polymers, particularly the substituted celluloses such as methyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), hyroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, and the like.
Preferred surfactants are non-ionic surfactants. Particularly preferred surfactant is polyoxyethlene (20) sorbitan monooleate (TWEEN-80).
In addition to parenteral dosage forms, the present compounds can also be administered in oral dosage forms and as implants.
Dosage forms containing the present compounds can also include additional anti-HIV and/or anti-HBV agents such as cabotegravir, dolutegravir, doravirine, evilegravir, lesiverine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, lamivudine, and the like.
The invention further provides, in various embodiments, a method of prophylaxis of viremia or treatment of a viral infection in a patient wherein inhibition of a reverse transcriptase is medically indicated, comprising administering to the patient an effective amount or concentration of a compound of Formula (II). More specifically, the compound of Formula (II) can be administered in a formulation that provides for slow or controlled or sustained release of EFdA from these prodrugs. More specifically, the compound of Formula (II) can be formulated as aqueous suspension, solutions, and can be encapsulated in particles for slow-release including PLGA and other such materials known in the art. More specifically, the viral infection can be caused by HIV or HBV. The routes of administration for these prodrugs can include, but not limited to, oral, parenteral and release from implants (drug delivery composition and device). In the method for the treatment or prevention of the viral infection, the method may further comprise an additional anti-HIV and/or and agent including but not limited to, cabotegravir, dolutegravir, doravirine, elvitegravir, lersiverine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, lamivudine, and the like.
The concentration of surfactant was optimized with 0.3% and 0.5% of methyl cellulose in a formation containing 400 mg/gm of micronized Compound 5. Formulations were prepared with different concentrations of TWEEN-80 (0.1, 0.2 and 0.3%). No significant effect of surfactant concentration was observed in viscosity; flow and redispersion time in the formulations after 10 days of storage. The observations are reported in Table 5.
A bulk batch (40 gm) of Compound 5 suspension was prepared with 0.3% methyl cellulose and 0.2% TWEEN-60 concentration. Although the polymer and surfactant concentrations were optimized with 40 weight % of drug concentration, a bulk batch was also prepared with 35 weight of drug concentration during accelerated and long term stability studies. The composition of formulation loaded in stability chamber is given in Table 6. A detailed manufacturing procedure of formulation preparation and composition is given below.
Methyl cellulose was slowly added to the requisite quantity of water for injection (WFI) in a glass bottle with continuous stirring. The resulting mixture was stirred until the solution was clear and free from any lumps using a magnetic stirrer. TWEEN-80 (0.08 g) was added to the obtained solution and stirred well.
Micronized Compound 5 (14 g; average particle size 11 μm) was slowly added to the prepared polymer, surfactant solution under vigorous stirring at 1400 rpm using a 2.0 magnetic stirrer. After complete addition of Compound 5, the obtained suspension was stirred (600 rpm) for 20 minutes to uniformly disperse the particles.
The prepared formulation was characterized for various physicochemical properties such as assay, pH, % purity, redispersability, injectability, polymorphic form and particle size. The results are presented in Table 7.
The formulation shown in Table 6 was deemed acceptable based on the characteristics shown in fable 7.
Aqueous suspensions of EFdA and of Compounds 3 and 5 were administered subcutaneously to Rhesus Macaque, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) periodically retrieved, and pharmaconkinetic data evaluated. The observed results are presented in Tables 8, 9, and 10, for both compounds, and in
This application is a continuation of and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 from U.S. application Ser. No. 17/642559, filed on Mar. 11, 2022, which is a 371 of PCT/US2020/050511, filed on Sep. 11, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/898,679 filed on Sep. 11, 2019. The entire contents of these priority applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62898679 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17642559 | Mar 2022 | US |
Child | 18233959 | US |