The present disclosure generally relates to devices, systems and methods for aortic heart valve replacement.
Aortic stenosis is the most common form of aortic valve disease, affecting more than 1.5 million Americans (more than 500,000 with severe disease) according to the American Heart Association. Patients with severe aortic stenosis are treated with aortic valve replacement (AVR), and roughly 100,000 AVR procedures (AVRs) are performed annually in the United States alone. Presently all AVRs are completed with permanent prosthetic aortic heart valve implants. Some AVRs are completed with mechanical valves, which are considered permanent solutions because they do not deteriorate. However, mechanical valves require long-term treatment with anticoagulant medications. Therefore, most AVRs are completed with bioprosthetic valves, which generally do not require long-term treatment with anticoagulant medications. However, bioprosthetic valves are not considered permanent solutions because they inevitably deteriorate, which can lead to significant clinical issues 10 to 15 years after implantation and, too often, even sooner.
Patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR therefore often face the challenges of needing another AVR a number of years after the initial AVR, and that the second AVR may be more complicated than the first. Much of the additional complexity with the second and subsequent AVRs is related to the presence of a failed valve that was implanted initially in a “permanent” manner, i.e., a manner that makes the replacement procedure difficult and riskier. Patients undergoing a procedure to replace a prosthetic aortic heart valve are also often poor candidates for surgical explantation of the previously implanted prosthetic aortic heart valve. Often, such an AVR procedure is not an appealing option even for good candidates. On the other hand, leaving the existing prosthetic aortic heart valve in place leaves chronic and, typically, increasing challenges for both the patient and healthcare providers.
Presently available prosthetic aortic heart valves are designed for permanent implantation either surgically by open-heart surgery (SAVR) or percutaneously by transcatheter AVR (TAVR). SAVRs may be mechanical or bioprosthetic. TAVRs are generally all bioprosthetic. Mechanical aortic valve prostheses require permanent anticoagulation therapy, which decreases thrombotic risk at the expense of increased bleeding risk. Over the years following SAVR with a mechanical valve, bleeding events are seemingly inevitable. Bleeding events require interruption of anticoagulation therapy, and this increases risk of mechanical valve thrombosis. Mechanical valve thrombosis may lead to valve dysfunction, which can then require treatment with risky thrombolytic drugs and/or surgical explantation and replacement of the dysfunctional mechanical valve. Also, mechanical valve thrombosis may lead to systemic arterial thrombo-embolism with consequent stroke or other, life-threatening ischemia/infarction. After interruption of anticoagulation therapy, when sources of bleeding are controlled and bleeding risk is thought to again be acceptable, anticoagulation therapy is resumed. Thrombotic risk is once again exchanged for bleeding risk.
Bioprosthetic aortic valves all degenerate and would ideally be replaced during the life of the patient. Therefore, many patients undergoing AVR with a bioprosthesis will eventually need a replacement or “redo” AVR. Some patients may need a third or even a fourth redo AVR. For example, a 40-year-old patient could easily need four bioprostheses to survive to age 80. A 40-year-old patient may need more than four bioprostheses to reach age 80 because younger patients tend to “wear out” bioprostheses more quickly than older patients. For example, the first prosthetic aortic valve or two may last less than 10 years or even less than five years. Transcatheter bioprostheses also fail, probably at a rate like surgical bioprostheses, although this is an area of ongoing research.
Presently, there are two options for replacement of dysfunctional surgical and transcatheter aortic valve bioprostheses. These options are surgical redo AVR, in which the existing prosthetic valve is surgically removed before a new prosthetic valve is sewn into place, and “valve-in-valve” AVR, in which a transcatheter valve is deployed inside the existing SAVR or TAVR. With this latter option, the existing prosthetic aortic heart valve is not removed. Surgical redo AVR is highly invasive in every case, is usually riskier than the first AVR, and is often avoided in favor of valve-in-valve AVR or no replacement AVR at all.
With a valve-in-valve AVR, the existing bioprosthetic leaflets are permanently fixed in the “open” position when the new (replacement) prosthetic aortic heart valve is expanded and thereby implanted within the existing valve. In most cases, this results in some limitation of access to the coronary arteries during future catheterization procedures, which can be a significant problem for patients with coronary artery disease. In the worst case this leads to fatal myocardial infarction. Also, effective orifice area and, therefore, the ease of blood flow through the valve, is diminished with every valve-in-valve AVR. In this regard the existing prosthetic valve(s) take up space within the natural aortic valve annulus, and patient-prosthesis mismatch (where the normally functioning new valve is too small for the patient) becomes a bigger problem.
For reasons such as those given above, many patients with dysfunctional aortic valve bioprostheses are anatomically poor candidates for valve-in-valve AVR and have limited options. Some of these patients will undergo relatively invasive and risky surgical redo AVR procedures. Others will undergo relatively complex valve-in-valve AVRs, including additional procedures to mitigate risk of coronary artery occlusion and patient-prosthesis mismatch. Coronary artery occlusion risk may be mitigated by Bioprosthetic Aortic Scallop Intentional Laceration to prevent Iatrogenic Coronary Artery obstruction (BASILICA) or by “snorkel stenting.” Patient-prosthesis mismatch may be reduced by intentional fracturing and expansion of an old bioprosthetic SAVR, but fracturing is not really an option for older TAVRs.
Because of risks related to redo AVR, some patients with failed aortic valve bioprostheses will choose to accept low quality of life and a poor prognosis for survival. Many of today's patients do not choose mechanical prosthetic aortic valves because of the long-term bleeding risk, and they don't want bioprosthetic valves because of the specter of increasingly complex redo AVRs every 10 to 15 years (or more frequently) in the future. Because of the limitations of current AVR technologies, “lifetime management” of aortic valve disease has become an increasingly studied subject in cardiovascular research.
For these and other reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved manners of replacing previously implanted prosthetic aortic heart valves.
In one illustrative embodiment, an aortic heart valve replacement system is provided and includes a prosthetic aortic heart valve movable between a collapsed condition for directing the prosthetic aortic heart valve to the location of the natural aortic heart valve and an expanded condition for fixing the prosthetic aortic heart valve at the location of the natural aortic heart valve of a patient. The collapsed condition is also used for later explanting the prosthetic aortic heart valve. Of course, it is to be understood that during explantation the prosthetic aortic heart valve may be more or less “collapsed” than when it was originally implanted. A prosthetic aortic heart valve dock is included in the system and has a ring structure configured to receive the prosthetic aortic heart valve in the expanded condition and to release the prosthetic aortic heart valve during an explantation procedure when the prosthetic aortic heart valve needs to be replaced. At least one of the prosthetic aortic heart valve or the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock includes one or more arresting elements (such as, for example, frictional surface elements and/or at least one stop element in the form of a projecting portion) configured to prevent unwanted movement of the prosthetic aortic heart valve within the dock. It will be appreciated that other forms of arresting elements may be used in addition to or instead of those more specifically discussed herein.
The system may include one or more additional, optional, and/or more specific features. The prosthetic aortic heart valve dock may include a sewing ring portion configured to be surgically implanted by suturing the sewing ring portion to aortic tissue at the location of the natural aortic heart valve. Alternatively, the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock may be configured to be implanted using a transcatheter procedure. At least one of the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock or the prosthetic aortic heart valve may include at least one frictional surface element. Instead of or in addition to frictional surface elements, at least one of the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock or the prosthetic aortic heart valve may include at least one projecting portion or “stop element.” The stop element may be directed radially inward along the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock or radially outward along the prosthetic aortic heart valve. As mentioned, other forms of arresting elements may be used in addition to or instead of frictional elements, stop elements or any other element having a similar function.
In another illustrative embodiment, an aortic heart valve replacement system includes a prosthetic aortic heart valve movable between a collapsed condition for directing the prosthetic aortic heart valve to the location of the natural aortic heart valve and an expanded condition for fixing the prosthetic aortic heart valve at the location of the natural aortic heart valve of a patient. The collapsed condition is also used for later explanting the prosthetic aortic heart valve, such as discussed herein. A prosthetic aortic heart valve dock is included in the system and has a ring structure configured to receive the prosthetic aortic heart valve in the expanded condition and configured to release the prosthetic aortic heart valve during an explantation procedure when the prosthetic aortic heart valve needs to be replaced. At least one of the prosthetic aortic heart valve or the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock may include features and/or structures that inhibit future endothelial growth and/or facilitate the destruction of endothelial growth between the prosthetic aortic heart valve and the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock at least to an extent that loosens adhesion between these two elements.
The aortic heart valve replacement system may have one or more additional, optional, and/or more specific features. For example, inhibiting endothelial growth may include a drug-eluting coating or treatment on at least one of the contacting surfaces of the prosthetic aortic heart valve or the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock. The drug may be any medication designed to inhibit endothelial growth. A radially outward facing surface portion of the prosthetic aortic heart valve may include the drug-eluting coating. A radially inward facing surface portion of the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock may include the drug-eluting coating. Destroying endothelial growth may include the use of at least one electrically conductive element configured to receive a contacting conductor of an electrosurgical element to facilitate the transfer of electrical energy to the interface between the prosthetic aortic heart valve and the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock sufficient to at least assist with disengagement of existing endothelial growth and attendant adhesion between the prosthetic aortic heart valve and the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock. The electrically conductive element may include an electrical terminal or terminals extending from the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock or the prosthetic aortic heart valve and configured to be engaged by an electrically conductive engaging device, such as a snare, endovascular forceps, valve explantation device, or similar device.
Another illustrative embodiment of an aortic heart valve replacement system may include a prosthetic aortic heart valve movable between a collapsed condition for directing the prosthetic aortic heart valve to the location of the natural aortic heart valve and an expanded condition for fixing the prosthetic aortic heart valve at the location of the natural aortic heart valve of a patient. The collapsed condition is also used for later explanting the prosthetic aortic heart valve, such as discussed herein. A prosthetic aortic heart valve dock is included in the system and has a ring structure configured to receive the prosthetic aortic heart valve in the expanded condition and configured to release the prosthetic aortic heart valve during an explantation procedure when the prosthetic aortic heart valve needs to be replaced.
Another illustrative embodiment of an aortic heart valve replacement system includes a prosthetic aortic heart valve movable between a collapsed condition for directing the prosthetic aortic heart valve to the location of the natural aortic heart valve and an expanded condition for fixing the prosthetic aortic heart valve at the location of the natural aortic heart valve of a patient. The collapsed condition is also used for later explanting the prosthetic aortic heart valve, such as discussed herein. A prosthetic aortic heart valve explantation device is included in the system and has a portion movable between an expanded condition configured to engage the prosthetic aortic heart valve and a collapsed condition configured to be directed within a catheter. The prosthetic aortic heart valve includes engageable elements capable of being grasped or otherwise engaged and held by the portion of the explantation device allowing the prosthetic aortic heart valve to be pulled into the catheter.
The system may have one or more additional, optional, and/or more specific features. For example, the engageable elements may include hook-like elements. Instead or in addition, the engageable elements may be part of a radially expandable and collapsible stent structure of the prosthetic aortic heart valve. The explantation device may include hook-like elements configured to engage with the prosthetic aortic heart valve. In other embodiments the explantation device may include a snare-like structure. The snare-like structure may have one or more loops that could constrict or collapse and engage with suitable structure on the prosthetic aortic heart valve for purposes of pulling on and extracting the prosthetic aortic heart valve from a prosthetic aortic heart valve dock during a transcatheter explantation process. The explantation device may involve a snare or set of snares that engage elements of the prosthetic aortic heart valve. The explantation device may engage with the stent structure of the prosthetic aortic heart valve. The explantation device may engage with the prosthetic aortic heart valve by expanding in a radially outward direction. Alternatively, the explantation device may engage with the prosthetic aortic heart valve by collapsing in a radially inward direction. The explantation device may include a steerable catheter and/or a catheter having a bent distal tip portion.
In another illustrative aspect, a prosthetic aortic heart valve replacement method is provided and includes directing a catheter to the location of the natural aortic heart valve where a prosthetic aortic heart valve was previously implanted within a prosthetic aortic heart valve dock. The prosthetic aortic heart valve dock may have been surgically implanted by suturing the sewing ring portion to aortic tissue at the location of the natural aortic heart valve or may have been implanted using a transcatheter procedure. The prosthetic aortic heart valve may have been secured in the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock using one or more arresting elements configured to prevent unwanted movement of the prosthetic aortic heart valve within the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock. At the time of replacement of the previously implanted or “old” prosthetic aortic heart valve, the old prosthetic aortic heart valve is removed from the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock, which remains in place at the location of the natural aortic heart valve. Removal of the old prosthetic aortic heart valve from the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock is facilitated by collapsing the old prosthetic aortic heart valve into the distal end of an explantation catheter. Once collapsed into the distal end of the explantation catheter and removed from the prosthetic aortic valve dock, the old prosthetic aortic heart valve may be removed from the patient using the explantation catheter. A new prosthetic aortic heart valve may then be implanted into the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock using a transcatheter procedure. The method may include various additional, optional, and/or more specific methodology and/or involve the use of various additional, optional, and/or more specific structures. Adhesion caused by bonding endothelial growth between the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock and the prosthetic aortic heart valve may be released or, in other words, loosened to facilitate explantation of the old prosthetic aortic heart valve. Loosening adhesion caused by bonding endothelial growth between the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock and the prosthetic aortic heart valve may involve establishing an electrical connection with at least one of the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock and/or the prosthetic aortic heart valve to facilitate the transfer of electrosurgical energy to the interface between the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock and the prosthetic aortic heart valve sufficient to assist with disruption of the bonding endothelial growth. Establishing the electrical connection may include engaging an electrical terminal extending from at least one of the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock and/or the prosthetic aortic heart valve. Establishing the electrical connection may also include engaging the prosthetic aortic heart valve itself. Loosening adhesion caused by bonding endothelial growth may involve the application of electrosurgical energy to at least one of the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock or the prosthetic aortic heart valve. For example, electrosurgical energy may be applied in a bipolar arrangement (with both electrodes residing inside the patient) to localize energy application at the dock-valve interface, minimizing energy loss and non-target tissue injury during transcatheter electrosurgical disruption of bonding endothelial growth. The electrosurgical energy may be supplied by an electrosurgical generator or any device that applies energy in a safe and effective manner for loosening adhesion between the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock and the prosthetic aortic heart valve.
Removing the prosthetic aortic heart valve from the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock may include grasping or otherwise engaging and holding engageable elements of the prosthetic aortic heart valve with an explantation device and pulling the prosthetic aortic heart valve into the catheter. The explantation device may include hook-like elements, and removing the prosthetic aortic heart valve may include grasping the prosthetic aortic heart valve with the hook-like elements. The explantation device may include a stent-like structure, and removing the prosthetic aortic heart valve may include grasping or otherwise engaging and holding the prosthetic aortic heart valve with the stent-like structure. Grasping or otherwise engaging and holding the prosthetic aortic heart valve may include expanding the stent-like structure in a radially outward direction or collapsing the stent-like structure in a radially inward direction. Directing the catheter may include directing a steerable catheter and/or a catheter with a bent distal tip portion to the location of the natural aortic heart valve where a prosthetic aortic heart valve was previously implanted.
Additional features and advantages of the inventive aspects will become more apparent upon review of the following detailed description taken together with accompanying drawings of the illustrative and exemplary embodiments.
Generally, in accordance with various embodiments, an aortic valve replacement system is provided to facilitate the safe and effective removal and replacement of previously implanted prosthetic aortic heart valves with new or “replacement” prosthetic aortic heart valves. The system generally includes a prosthetic aortic heart valve dock, a prosthetic aortic heart valve, and a transcatheter valve removal or explantation system. Various unique features may be included in or for use with each component, thereby facilitating the replacement of the previously implanted prosthetic valve often years after the previous implantation and after years of use by the patient. The prosthetic aortic heart valve dock may be implanted surgically at SAVR or using a catheter at TAVR. The dock facilitates the anchoring of the first prosthetic aortic heart valve as well as its future removal and replacement. The “surgical dock” has a sewing ring and may be implanted surgically along with a prosthetic aortic heart valve constructed in accordance with one or more unique features discussed herein, and in anticipation of the eventual valve failure and transcatheter replacement, such as described herein. Various illustrative embodiments are shown in the figures and described below for exemplary purposes. Like reference numerals between the embodiments refer to like structure and function/methodology. It will also be understood that transcatheter (catheter-based) procedures are generally performed with the heart beating, while surgical procedures will be performed with the patient on a hemodynamic support system.
Referring to
Referring again to the surgically implantable prosthetic aortic heart valve dock 40 shown in
As and/or after any adhesion between the prosthetic aortic heart valve 60 and prosthetic aortic heart valve dock 40 is loosened or eliminated, as further shown in
In some embodiments, “intravascular lithotripsy” may be employed to help facilitate the explantation of the prosthetic aortic heart valve 60. Intravascular lithotripsy involves inflating an intravascular lithotripsy balloon at the treatment site and subsequently activating “emitters” within the balloon, which send acoustic pulses (“shockwaves”) out from the balloon to fracture nearby calcium without damaging adjacent soft tissue. Intravascular lithotripsy may be employed to fracture calcium on the degenerated leaflets 62 of an old prosthetic aortic heart valve 60, facilitating more complete collapsing of the prosthetic aortic heart valve 60 and its successful removal through an explantation catheter 102. Intravascular lithotripsy may be used in addition to electrosurgical separation of the prosthetic aortic heart valve 60 from the prosthetic aortic heart valve dock 40, prior to mechanical explantation of the prosthetic aortic heart valve 60. Intravascular lithotripsy may help to avoid a likely problem, where the prosthetic aortic heart valve leaflets 62 have a significant calcium buildup and are so rigid that they prevent the prosthetic aortic heart valve 60 from collapsing adequately to be removed via the explantation catheter 102.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of specific embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not intended to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. The various features discussed herein may be used alone or in any combination within and between the various embodiments. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and methods and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the scope or spirit of the general inventive concept.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/437,782, filed Jan. 9, 2023 (pending), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63437782 | Jan 2023 | US |