The present invention generally relates to the use of squeegees in the production of printed wiring boards (“PWBs”), and more particularly to an apparatus and method for utilizing a segmented squeegee on PWBs.
The production of PWBs includes a variety of techniques to deposit solder paste on a substrate. One method of depositing solder paste includes stenciling. This method includes the use of a stencil with cutouts in the stencil corresponding to the desired solder pattern for a PWB. The stencil, typically constructed of metal, is applied to the surface of a PWB and solder paste is applied to the stencil. A straight, rigid edge element, commonly referred to as a squeegee, is pressed down on the stencil and is wiped or moved across the stencil to deposit an even, smooth portion of solder paste into the cutouts of the stencil. Once the squeegee and stencil are removed, a solder pattern is left behind on the PWB.
The print quality of the PWB depends on the consistency of the dimensions and thickness of the solder paste after deposition. The dimensions and the patterns of the stencil in the stenciling process typically control the amount and thickness of the deposited solder paste. However, accurate deposition of the solder paste requires the stencil to be flush or in contact with the surface of the PWB as solder paste is deposited. Typically, the stencil is forced into contact with the PWB by the squeegee during the stenciling process.
Unfortunately, the non-coplanarity of PWBs significantly affects the print quality of the stenciling process because contact between the stencil and the PWB cannot be maintained during the stenciling process. As shown in
The effect on print quality is particularly problematic for large PWBs. As the size of the PWB grows, the warpage or non-coplanarity typically worsens. This makes stenciling on large sized PWBs difficult with conventional equipment. Unfortunately, most large sized boards contain warpage and non-coplanarity characteristics that are incompatible with the use of conventional equipment, even if the boards meet standard specifications (0.75% max warpage per inch), such as IPC-2221 for surface mount technology.
The conventional equipment available for stenciling solder paste or adhesives on large size PWBs, such as boards greater than 18×24 inches, includes a metal stencil and a long, straight, rigid squeegee. The conventional squeegee is typically greater than 18 inches long and constructed from metal, generally stainless steel.
Stenciling large sized PWBs using a conventional long, straight squeegee results in unacceptable print quality because the squeegee is incapable of conforming to the non-coplanarity of the large sized boards. For example, as solder paste is spread over the stencil, a long, straight, rigid squeegee rides on the peaks of a warped large sized board without adequately pressing into the low lying areas of the board. As a result, conventional squeegees inadequately maintain contact between the stencil and the surface of the PWB. Consequently, deposition of solder paste onto low lying areas of a warped large sized board is inconsistent and insufficient to meet minimum print quality.
In previous attempts to overcome non-coplanarity have included increasing the downward pressure from the squeegee, using a flexible squeegee, and even trying to improve the coplanarity requirements on PWBs. Unfortunately, increased pressure from the squeegee results in damage to the stencil and the underlying PWB during the stenciling process. Further, increased pressure and friction between the stencil and squeegee results in significantly increased wear of and increased replacement of stenciling equipment.
Another attempt includes the use of flexible squeegees, which provide some ability to conform to the contours of the PWB. However, flexible squeegees are significantly less durable and more difficult to clean. While rigid squeegees provide a durable and consistent edge, which is necessary for uniform and accurate solder deposition, flexible squeegees have edges that degrade quickly under repeated use and cleaning.
Finally, attempts to require more consistent and coplanar PWBs are not practical for large sized PWBs. The increased cost of producing PWB with greater copalanarity is prohibitive, especially due to the fact that much of the warpage of the PWB is due to local heating and cooling during subsequent processing of the PWB.
Therefore, there exists a need for a squeegee capable of improving PWB print quality and compensating for the non-coplanar characteristics of large sized boards.
One embodiment of the present invention generally relates to a squeegee assembly for applying a medium to a surface. The squeegee assembly includes a plurality of squeegee segments and a support structure. The plurality of squeegee segments and the support structure are joined by a plurality of independent linkages.
Another embodiment of the present invention relates to a configuration of the squeegee segments. The squeegee segments are positioned in a staggered and overlapped configuration. The squeegee segments allow excess solder paste to be transferred across the stencil in the squeegee direction and in a substantially perpendicular direction to the squeegee direction.
Another embodiment of the present invention relates to a method of stenciling a medium onto a top surface of a substrate. The method steps include positioning a stencil on the substrate, such that the bottom surface of the stencil is in substantial contact with the top surface of the substrate and applying solder paste to the top surface of the stencil. The method also includes squeegeeing the top surface of the stencil with a plurality of independent squeegee segments in a predetermined direction and maintaining substantial contact, beneath each of the plurality of independent squeegee segments, between the bottom surface of the stencil and the top surface of the substrate.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the present invention, it may be believed the same will be better understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, in a non-limiting fashion, the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out the present invention, and in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the figures, wherein:
For simplicity and illustrative purposes, the principles of the present invention are described by referring mainly to exemplary embodiments thereof. However, one of ordinary skill in the art would readily recognize that the same principles are equally applicable to, and can be implemented in, many types of printing or stenciling processes and that any such variations do not depart from the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Moreover, in the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying figures, which illustrate specific embodiments. Electrical, mechanical, logical and structural changes may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
In
The conventional stenciling assembly shown in
The stencil 60 typically controls the thickness and pattern of solder paste 70 deposited on the PWB 50. As shown in
Due to the concentration of stresses on the high sections of a warped PWB 50 (shown as the outer sides in
It should be understood that the non-coplanarity of the PWB 50 shown in
Referring now to
Each of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D are connected to the support structure 20 with a mechanical linkage or connection 105. The linkage 105 includes a lower beam or lower squeegee holder 110, a hinge or flexible joint 120, a upper beam or upper squeegee holder 130, and a biasing member 140. The segmented squeegee assembly connects via a bracket or connector 80 to a transmission or motor for moving the segmented squeegee assembly during the process of stenciling. It should be noted that the linkages 105 are independent and permit independent movement of each of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D.
The squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D and their independent movement allow for each segment to exert independent forces and individually apply the soldering paste 70. Because each segment is responsible for a smaller section of the stencil 60 and the PWB 50, less force may be required to maintain contact between the stencil 60 and the PWB 50. This may reduce the total amount of force required and reduce the amount of stress applied to the stencil 60 and the PWB 50 during the stenciling process. Further, the reduced total force may decrease the wear on the squeegee and stencil, prolonging the usable life of the components.
The biasing member 140 biases each of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D such that the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D conform to the surface of the PWB 50 as shown in
The individual squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D are shorter in length than the conventional squeegee 10, allowing the smaller squeegee segments to press down, between the high sections of the PWB 50, into the low-lying areas. By comparison, the long squeegee 10, as shown in
The support structure 20 is illustrated as a solid plate approximately the same width as the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D. However, the support structure 20 may include hollow structures, beams, tubes, or other structures known to one skilled in the art so long as the structure is capable of withstanding the forces exerted through connector 80 and supporting the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D. The support structure 20 must also be sufficiently stiff such that the support structure 20 may react against the biasing members 140 during the stenciling process in order to press the stencil 60 into contact with the surface of the PWB 50 and to maintain consistent contact as the support structure 20 moves.
It should be noted that the hinge or joint 120 and the biasing member 140 are configured to provide each of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D with two degrees of freedom of motion. The first degree of freedom includes vertical movement up and down with the biasing member 140 forcing the squeegee segments in a downward direction. The second degree of freedom includes angular movement about the joint or pivot point 120.
The two degrees of freedom of motion enables each of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D to engage to PWB 50 with as little gap between the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D and the PWB 50 as possible. For example, in
The biasing member 140 provides the ability to for the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D to apply consistent downward forces and to engage the PWB 50 at different elevations as seen in
Referring now to
The staggered and overlapped configuration also improves consistency by continuously removing excess solder paste forward and to the side of the PWB 50 during the stenciling process. While the prior art allows solder paste to clump and build up in front of the single squeegee 10, the staggered and overlapped configuration directs clumps and excess solder paste to the side. This may reduce solder paste clumps and excess accumulation from creating divots or other inconsistencies in the solder paste as the squeegee segments pass over the deposition patterns in the stencil 60.
The staggered and overlapped configuration of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D includes each of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D being angularly disposed from the direction of arrow A. The angle of each squeegee segment 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D, as shown in
As solder paste 70 is pushed forward and to the side by the angular position of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D, some amount of solder paste 70 falls to the side of each squeegee segment and is left behind. To avoid any solder paste 70 being left behind on the stencil 60, the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D are staggered and overlapped. The squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D are staggered in the direction of arrow A with squeegee segment 100A being position behind squeegee segment 100B. Likewise, squeegee segment 100B is behind squeegee segment 100C, which is behind squeegee segment 100D. Further, the squeegee segments are overlapped as shown by the overlap 150 between squeegee segments 100A and 100B.
The overlap 150 and staggered positioning allows for the staggered and overlapped configuration where each squeegee segment picks up the solder paste 70 left behind by the squeegee segment in front. This staggered and overlapped effect provides a stenciling process that avoids leaving solder paste clumps behind and avoids having excessive build up of solder paste on the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D during stenciling. The squeegee segment 100A pushes excess solder paste 70 to the side of the stencil 60 and away from the PWB 50. Then, the excess solder paste 70 may be easily cleaned or removed without affecting the PWB 50 under the stencil 60.
It should be noted that the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D provide independent action between the segments such that each segment can maintain contact, through the stencil, with the PWB as the squeegee segments are wiped across the stencil in the direction of arrow A. As opposed to the conventional squeegee 10 and the gap 52, the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D may eliminate a substantial amount of gap 52, as shown in
It is important to note that the configuration of the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D as shown in
Referring now to
The lower squeegee holder 110 and the upper squeegee holder 130 are joined by a hinge or joint 120. As shown in
Although, the hinge 120 is shown in
In
The biasing member 140 is shown as a common commercially available coil spring and is made up of spring steel. The biasing member 140 accommodates an up-down movement of the holder 130 as the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D follow the height of the PWB surface. This up-down movement is typically less than 0.010 inch. An alignment pin (not shown) may be used to prevent the squeegee segments 100A, 100B, 100C, and 100D from rotating about the axis of the upper squeegee holder 130 due to the flexibility of the biasing member 140. As would be obvious to one of ordinary skill, the alignment pin may engage the support structure 20 and the upper squeegee holder 130 as necessary to control any squeegee segment rotation about the axis of the upper squeegee holder 130 and to maintain the squeegee segment orientation as shown in
Although the embodiment shown in
While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments without departing from the true spirit and scope. The terms and descriptions used herein are set forth by way of illustration only and are not meant as limitations. In particular, although the method has been described by examples, the steps of the method may be performed in a different order than illustrated or simultaneously. Those skilled in the art will recognize that these and other variations are possible within the spirit and scope as defined in the following claims and their equivalents.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/552,963, filed Mar. 12, 2004, entitled “SEGMENTED SQUEEGEE FOR STENCILING” and, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1583283 | Dunlap | May 1926 | A |
| 3943849 | Vasilantone | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4193345 | Schoneberger et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4404903 | Cronin | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4599248 | Shirataki | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4638733 | Schneider et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4715278 | Ericsson | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4937097 | Ichinose et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5044306 | Erdmann | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5047262 | deVries et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5105551 | McCutchen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5346552 | Zimmer | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5392705 | Jaffa | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5479854 | Chikahisa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5647907 | van der Meulen | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5681387 | Schmidt | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5709751 | van der Meulen | Jan 1998 | A |
| 6092463 | Onishi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6112656 | Asai et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6112657 | Bill | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6131510 | Gasquez | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6142070 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6272984 | Kato et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6352026 | Murakami | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6397741 | Curtin | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6494132 | Sano et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6494133 | Ooe | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6612231 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6663712 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 20010008101 | Ooe | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20020108513 | Onishi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166505 | Hikami et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020195007 | Sano et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20050268799 | Pham-Van-Diep et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3841116 | Sep 1989 | DE |
| 08011287 | Jan 1996 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60552963 | Mar 2004 | US |