This is a US national phase patent application that claims priority from PCT/FI2005/000051, filed 26 Jan. 2005, that claims priority from Finnish Patent Application No. 20040113, filed 27 Jan. 2004.
The invention is concerned with an aeration system and method for mixing and/or aeration of water.
Biological treatment is an important phase in the treatment of wastewaters and it is also the phase consuming most energy. In biological treatment carried out by means of aeration, it is necessary to continuously feed oxygen into the water in order to enable bacterial activity in the process. The oxygen concentration decreases also in natural waters during the long winter season, when the ice covering prevents a natural oxidation through the air. This phenomenon might lead to oxygen depletion, death of fish and a final pollution of the lake. Biological treatment is also used for e.g. removal of gases, such as radon, from the water by aeration.
Bottom aeration is the most common way for aeration of waters. In this method, air is pumped into the water through a membrane with holes on the bottom of the basin. Attempts have been made to start using surface aeration instead of bottom aeration, primarily of maintenance reasons. In these methods, air has been fed to rotating propellers on or near the surface of the water, which propellers have mixed air with streaming water. Also such devices are known, in which different flow pieces have been placed in the streams created by the propellers in order to improve the transfer of the air into the water and the mixing of the air with the water. The main drawback with these devices is their contamination and clogging in use. In addition, they have often required separate water mixers to keep the whole water content in the basin in a sufficient movement, whereby the waste water sludge can be prevented from falling down to the bottom of the basin.
Also such apparatuses have been used in aeration, wherein the water has been lead, by means of a pump, to a cylindrical space above the water. The cylindrical space has had a number of holes, through which the water has been ejected to the surface of the water.
In addition, ejectors have been used for aeration, in which a water jet has sucked air in itself and this jet has then been lead to the bottom of the basin, whereby circulation has been achieved in the basin at the same time. Characteristic for all surface aeration devices have been their efficiency, in other words, the amount of dissolved oxygen in each energy unit has been low.
The aeration causes ca 80% of the energy costs of a waste water treatment plant (i.e. an activated sludge plant, i.e. a plant using biological treatment) and this electricity consumption corresponds to ca 30% of the operational costs of the waste water treatment plant. The energy consumption is therefore of essential importance in aeration.
Typical oxidation effects in practice are, when it is question about a fine bubble aeration unit, which works as a bottom aerator: 1.7-3.0 kgO2/kWh, a coarse bubble aerator which works as a bottom aerator: 1.7-2.3 kgO2/kWh, a surface aerator: 1.3-2.2 kgO2/kWh or a combination aerator (OKI): 1.5-3.2 kgO2/kWh. The maintenance of a bottom aerator is difficult. Usually, the basin has to be emptied for the service (a part of them having separate bottom floats, which can be lifted one by one). In addition, the service is expensive and takes several weeks. For an example customer, the aeration system (including aeration plates, pipes, the installation, a compressor hall and the compressors) has cost 300.000 EUR. The service, which has to be performed with intervals of 4-6 years, costs 40-50.000 EUR.
In biological wastewater treatment there is often used both aerobic and anaerobic phases. The aerobic one requires oxidation and mixing, while the anaerobic one, in turn, requires an oxygen free environment and mixing. In the aerobic phase, biochemical load is typically removed from the wastewater and ammonium nitrogen is converted to nitrate by nitrification. In the anaerobic phase, the nitrogen in the wastewater is brought into a gaseous form and removes from the waste water. When the bottom aerators are stopped in the anaerobic phase, the water has to be mixed with separate mixers. This, in turn, increases the investments and number of objects to be maintained. In a part of the wastewater treatment plants, separate basins are used for the removal of nitrogen so that it would not be necessary to interrupt the bottom aeration. This, again, increases the investments. The bottom aerators gradually become clogged and their result worsens, especially if the aeration is often interrupted. By time, the effect of the bottom aerators lowers to 5-50% of the nominal effect.
Bottom aeration works best in basins 6-9 m deep, whereby the best efficiency is achieved. In low basins, the efficiency lowers fast, in very deep basins the compressed air has to be cooled to prevent the membranes of rubber/plastic from destruction. This increases both investments and operational costs.
The problem with surface aerators is the bad efficiency of the oxidation, the weak adjustability and the fact that the basin has to be rather low. A typical depth is 3.5 m, which makes the surface of the basins large and neither is their form optimal (expensive to make). A possibility to adjust would be important since the need of oxygen varies essentially e.g. when the load changes. Different surface aerators have been presented in e.g. the U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,021,154, 3,928,512 and 4,193,951.
The EP publication 465043 is also presented as prior art.
In order to avoid these and later appearing disadvantages and to achieve some other goals of the invention, the invention is concerned with an aeration system for aeration and/or mixing of water, which system comprises at least one aeration unit having a pump/propeller inside a feed pipe and a feed pipe, to which the water to be aerated is sucked from beneath. The aeration system is characterized in that, the feed pipe is expanding in the upper part of the aeration unit to a conical space working as a nozzle, via which the water continues its way to at least one annular opening.
The method of the invention is, in turn, characterized in that the water stream achieved with the propeller pump is lead to the feed pipe. The water is lead from the feed pipe via the part in the upper part of the feed pipe that expands to a conical space and work as a nozzle to one or more connected nozzle openings. After the nozzle opening, the underpressure of the jet is allowed to suck air in itself both from beneath and above. The water is lead away from the upper part of the aeration unit via the nozzle and further via the nozzle opening.
The preferable embodiments of the invention have the characteristics of the dependent claims.
In the apparatus of the invention, the water stream achieved with a propeller pump is lead to one or more annular nozzles on the surface of the water, in which units the water stream sucks air into it, which is efficiently mixed with the water thereby aerating it. The height of the nozzle opening should be restricted as well. Then the size of the bubbles that will be formed in the water remains small and are evenly distributed thereby enabling a high solution rate. This fact results in relatively small aeration units and most usually, the unit contains numerous aeration units. Only in the very smallest apparatuses it is possible to manage with only one aeration unit or nozzle opening.
This invention is concerned with a surface aeration apparatus/mixer. A feed pipe foreseen with a propeller pump belongs to the apparatus, with which pipe ground water poor of oxygen is sucked to the aerator. Near the surface, the feed pipe is branched into transversal feed pipes parallel with the surface. In the aeration unit, the water is lead to a circular nozzle opening. In the nozzle opening, the pressure energy is converted to kinetic energy. In this space, the water jet streaming from the nozzle opening sucks surrounding air to itself both beneath and above the jet, which is mixed with the water jet in the form of small bubbles. The jet maintains a big part of its kinetic energy until it meets the cylindrical covering or the surrounding water. The nozzle opening is vertical in order to lead the water jet out horizontally from the feed pipe or it is slanting upwards to lead the water stream out of it diagonally upwards.
When the water is taken into the apparatus from the bottom of the basin and returned back to the surface of the basin, the water of the basin will be efficiently circulated and the incoming water is as oxygen-poor as possible. This fact essentially increases the performance of the apparatus. In other aeration apparatuses, the oxygen content of the water coming to the aeration apparatus is of average level or the apparatus circulates the same relatively oxidized water. At the same time as the apparatus oxidizes efficiently, it circulates the water of the basin thereby preventing the falling of the sludge to the bottom. Thereby, there is no need for separate mixers.
As a summary, it may be stated that by calculating the oxidation efficiency of our test apparatus, one is ended up to an efficiency of 6.0 kg O2/kWh for an apparatus of the invention in large scale. The energy saving is considerable.
The advantages of the new apparatus of the invention are e.g.
In the following, the invention is described in detail by referring to some embodiment examples of the figures. The invention is not restricted to the details of the figures.
The invention can e.g. be performed without any cylindrical covering or the small propeller in the upper part; this matter might e.g. depend on the size of the basin.
The First Step of the Aeration—Pre-Aeration
There is another smaller propeller in the upper end of the apparatus, a propeller 40 for the pre-aeration, which is opposite-handed to the propeller 13 of the propeller pump so that it strives to push the water down. In this way, the propeller 40, which is in the upper end of the axle 12 between the motor and the propeller, mixes air in the turbulent water, which is efficiently mixed with the water and is removed from the aerator through the nozzle 17 in the form of a water jet. The bubbles are in strong movement, or turbulence, during the whole process. The size of the propeller 40 is smaller than the propeller 14 of the propeller pump as the amount of air needed is small and, in addition, a big amount of water could cause a gravitation of the propeller of the propeller pump, which essentially would weaken the function of the pump.
In tests, the pre-aeration increased the production with 5-15%.
The Second Step of the Aeration—the Nozzle Ring and the Water Jet
In the second step, the pressure of the water raised by the propeller pump is converted to kinetic energy.
Water is sucked from the bottom of the basin by means of the propeller pump 13 through the pipe 14. The propeller pump 13 sucks water and lifts it up to the aeration unit. The water arrives to the aeration unit from the feed pipe 14. The conical surface of the nozzle 17 of the aeration unit decreases the flow resistance of the water. In the nozzle 17, the pressure energy is completely converted to kinetic energy. The water jet 16 outwards from the nozzle 17 causes an under pressure, which sucks air to the water jet 16. The water becomes turbulent in the jet and as the under pressure draws air to it, this air is now efficiently mixed with the water and a big part of this oxygen is dissolved in the water, whereby aeration takes place. After the nozzle opening, the jet is quickly expanded in the horizontal plane and simultaneously, the thickness of the jet is decreased in the vertical direction in the same proportion by further increasing the aeration and turbulence. Finally, the water jet meets the outside water, which increases the effect of the mixing and aeration even more or it meets the cylindrical covering 41.
The Third Step of the Aeration—the Water Jet Meets the Wall
The water jet 16 from the nozzle, which water jet consists of water and air, meets the wall that is relatively nearby, in other words the cylindrical covering 41, thereby causing a strong impact, which splits the water jet into small water droplets and air bubbles. In tests, this wall has been 20-50 cm from the outer edge of the aeration unit. The apparatus has to be so high above the water that the jet is not damped (drowned) in the surrounding water, i.e. the aeration unit does not work if it is immersed. In that case any water jet would not be formed, the aeration unit would not be able to suck any air into a water jet and any radical collision with an outer wall, or with the cylindrical covering 41, would not take place. The apparatus aerates efficiently with a water column corresponding to 5-50 cm. If the aeration would be lifted up too high, e.g. 50 cm from the water surface, the pumping power needed would be twice as high (mgh, wherein h=height of water). If the pumping effect is increased with the aeration unit being in the correct depth to the water, such a situation is achieved, wherein the pumping power needed is strongly increased, but the gain of the aeration would no longer increase but very slowly.
So that the collision of the water jet would be as efficient as possible, a cylindrical covering 41 has been built around the aeration unit. When the water jet collides with the covering, the mixture of water and air is mixed and thereby causes aeration. In addition, more air from the surrounding atmosphere is mixed therein at the collision point, which fact increases the efficiency of the aeration.
The Forth Step of the Aeration—the Mixture of Water and Air Ends Up to the Water Below the Cylindrical Covering
After that the water has collided with the wall of the covering 41, a big part of the bubbles are mixed with and end up to the water underneath. There are much bubbles and the water now has to exit to the surrounding water 42 through this bubble cloud and under the cylindrical covering 41 or from that 43. Aeration takes place when the water moves through the bubble cloud. The stream inside the cylindrical covering 41 is tried to be dimensioned so that the bubble cloud would continue all the way to the bottom part of the cylinder 41. In this way, the water meets as many bubbles as possible on its way out to the surrounding water 42.
In tests performed with the above-mentioned multi-step aeration, the best results achieved have been over 6.0 kgO2/kWh (the efficiency of the motor 11 of the propeller pump is 80% and the efficiency of the propeller 13 is 70%).
The apparatus can also be used without any cylindrical covering 41. If the edges of the aeration basin are close to the outer edge of the aeration unit a corresponding phenomenon is achieved by making use of the form of the basin and the above-mentioned method/apparatus.
The form of the apparatus can also be something else than a body of revolution. The advantage of using a body of revolution is, however, the big length 18 of the nozzle opening. The gain of the aeration is in proportion to the length of the nozzle opening 18 (e.g. when the diameter is 30 cm at the nozzle opening, the length of the nozzle opening is π×30 cm, or ca 94 cm).
Water of for example 4° C. is completely saturated when 13.1 mg O2/liter oxygen has been dissolved therein in the normal atmosphere. Therefore the distance between the nozzle rings 15 should be as big as possible so that as much water as possible could be aerated (big flow-through of device). On the other hand, when this distance (the nozzle opening) becomes too big there is not enough air mixed with the water or it is not mixed uniformly enough and no air at all can move below the jet. Because of this fact, and if bigger oxidation amounts are wanted, the diameter of the nozzle rings 15 shall be increased. The level of oxidation is directly proportional to the diameter 18 of the nozzle opening. In other words, if a doubled capacity is wanted, the diameter 18 of the nozzle openings has to be doubled. If the capacity need is considerable, the resulting solutions are expensive. Two solutions to this are described later on.
It is essential in this invention that the jet is formed in the annular opening, whereby the jet is reduced when the radius increases. Good results were achieved in tests when the diameter of the nozzle opening was 75 mm and 290 mm. In the contrary, when the diameter of the nozzle opening was 750 mm, the result was bad. This is a consequence of the fact that the water jet did not expand so fast anymore in the horizontal plane and thus it did not become thinner in the vertical direction, which is a condition for an efficient aeration in this method. Example: The radius of the nozzle opening is 40 mm and the water jet outwards from the nozzle opening has the length of 360 mm. Then the water jet having a thickness of 20 mm has become thinner in the end of the water jet having a thickness of only 2 mm. If the radius of the nozzle opening would have been 720 mm and the length of the jet 360 mm, the jet would only have reduced to a thickness of 14 mm.
The water comes along the feed pipe in the direction of the arrows 36 to the aeration unit. The water 16 is removed between the nozzle rings 15 according to arrow 37 to the surrounding water in the form of a jet. The water achieves its highest speed in the narrowest point, i.e. in the nozzle opening 18, from which it is ejected outwards in the direction of the surface of the surrounding water or diagonally upwards. The nozzle 17 works as an ejector by absorbing air to the water jet from outside. The water that is ejected outwards absorbs air and mixes it efficiently with the water by causing aeration of the water, i.e. dissolving of oxygen in the water. When the water jet is thin enough water is absorbed from both sides of the water jet, above and beneath. The bubbles are very small and in this way there is formed a contact surface as big as possible between the air and the water thereby causing an efficient dissolving of oxygen into the water. The efficiency of the mixing is increased by a step, in which the mixture of water and air collides with the outside water mass or the cylindrical covering 41. The apparatus was also tested so that additional holes led to the nozzle opening, through which holes more air was received in them. The dissolving of oxygen was decreased as the size of the bubbles increased and there was relatively seen unnecessary much air in the water.
Before entering of the water in the nozzle 17, the surfaces are treated to be conical in order to make the energy consumption as low as possible. The construction of the upper part of the aeration unit appears from the figure. The lower part is otherwise identical except for the feed pipe connected thereto.
The solution described above provides several essential advantages:
The aeration system in question mixes water efficiently during the aeration. The water flows/streams out from the aeration units and, on the other hand, it is sucked all the time. This results in a strong flow movement and a mixing of the water in the whole basin. It is often important in treatment of wastewaters that the mixing is continued even if the aeration is stopped. This is performed so that the output of the pumping is lowered with an inverter, e.g. by halving the rotation speed. Then the water flows slower through the nozzle with no aeration. An other possible way for mixing the water without aeration is to change the direction of rotation of the motor. Then the water is taken in via the aeration units 20 and is pumped out through the feed pipe by causing a jet under the water without aeration. This is an efficient way to mix the water in the basin. In the lower part of the feed pipe there can furthermore be an additional pipe in accordance with the figure, a transversal feed pipe 26 with suction holes 33, with which the mixing is intensified. Suction holes are made in this pipe and the circulation and mixing of the water are controlled in this way. For example, a part of the suction holes can be at the front side of the pipe and part of them in the rear side, in which way turbulence of the water can be achieved in the basin.
The water feed pipe 14, 25 can consist of one pipe or, when necessary, several pipes can be placed one after another (a feed pipe and e.g. two successive extensions of the feed pipe). The feed pipes used can be standard pipes used for heating, plumbing and air conditioning. With such a construction, very deep basin can be aerated.
The cover 38 of the aeration unit can be externally fastened in accordance with
The cover 38 of the aeration unit can furthermore be adjusted in the vertical direction (raised and lowered) by means of an actuator 31. If the cover 38 is raised in a sufficient extent, the water can flow freely beneath the cover 38 without aeration to take place. An efficient mixing is hereby achieved. An additional advantage is that the pressure in the pipe system decreases and hereby also the energy consumption. When the cover 38 of the aeration unit is lowered such a situation is achieved, wherein the aeration starts. When the lowering of the cover 38 is continued further, the production of the aeration grows since the pressure in the pipe system increases and this pressure, in turn, is converted to kinetic energy in the nozzle. The higher speed in the nozzle 36, the bigger production of the aeration unit. When the pressure in the pipe system grows, the energy consumption grows at the same time. As there are several aeration units, a part of them can be shut by pressing down the cover 38 so much that it is shut and the flowing of water through the aeration unit is prevented. When for example an apparatus has 20 aeration units, 14 can be shut, whereby the production decreases with 70%. At the same time also the propeller pump is adjusted so that its production (flow) decreases with 70% so that the pressure in the aeration units can be kept constant.
The apparatus of the invention can be used also for oxidizing natural waters. In this case, the apparatus sucks oxygen-poor ground water to the apparatus, wherein the water is oxidized and it returns to the surface of the lake. During the winter season, the warmer ground water maintains an open hole in the ice. If the temperature graduation of the lake is wished to be maintained, the oxidized water can be lead deeper with a return pipe.
As the efficiency of both the propeller and the motor raises with growing size, it is usually worth using relatively big units, whereby the same pump unit feeds water to several aeration units.
When the aeration takes place at the surface of the water, saturated gases in the water are released in connection with the aeration, such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, ammonia and radon.
In batch purification, the different steps in the water purification takes place successively in the same space. In this case, the apparatus can be used after aeration for example for removal of nitrogen by stopping the oxidation but by continuing the mixing. In this way, the aerobic and the anaerobic steps of the process can be repeated alternately in the same basin.
The aeration apparatus of
The apparatus of
As appears in
In the apparatus of
While the present invention has been described in accordance with preferred compositions and embodiments, it is to be understood that certain substitutions and alterations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20040113 | Jan 2004 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2005/000051 | 1/26/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/2/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/070526 | 8/4/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
780780 | Culley | Jan 1905 | A |
1867824 | Hammerly | Jul 1932 | A |
1992762 | Pease | Feb 1935 | A |
2165889 | Fischer et al. | Jul 1939 | A |
2186371 | Durdin, Jr. | Jan 1940 | A |
3416729 | Ravitts et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3737105 | Arnold et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3771724 | Rose et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3797809 | Sydnor, Jr. | Mar 1974 | A |
3871581 | Dively | Mar 1975 | A |
3911065 | Martin et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3998389 | Rose | Dec 1976 | A |
4089620 | Ravitts | May 1978 | A |
4318871 | Mentz | Mar 1982 | A |
4358413 | Brucker | Nov 1982 | A |
4468358 | Haegeman | Aug 1984 | A |
4482510 | Khudenko | Nov 1984 | A |
5021154 | Haegeman | Jun 1991 | A |
5707562 | Karliner | Jan 1998 | A |
20030011082 | Tanabe et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2811990 | Sep 1979 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070063362 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |