A. Field of the Invention
Applicant's invention relates to apparatuses and methods for cleaning large, environmentally exposed surfaces and to mitigation of ecological damages from cleaning operations.
B. Background of the Invention
As will be apparent from the discussion to follow, Applicant's invention is directed primarily to the cleaning of aircraft. However, it should be noted that the apparatuses and methods discussed may be equally applicable, although not so direly needed, in other applications, such as the cleaning of building surfaces, non-aircraft vehicles, etc.
Aircraft must be routinely cleaned to remove accumulated dirt, soot, and other pollutants gathered on skin surfaces during operation. Allowing debris to accumulate adversely affects economy of operation. Contaminants on a aircraft's skin creates an uneven surface over which air flows more turbulently, thus requiring greater force (and fuel) to propel the aircraft at desired air speed. The significance of this effect is evidenced by a past United Parcel Service television commercial in which the company touted its more frequently that normal plane washing schedule for its resulting savings of millions of gallons of fuel each year. Particularly in the commercial realm, dirty aircraft also present an aesthetics and public image problem.
A serious problem faces the airline and aircraft maintenance industries in connection with their cleaning operations. The problem arises from the heretofore incompatible needs to minimize pollution of ground surfaces and ground water from the resulting mixtures of removed contaminants and cleaning solutions.
This problem is real, and not simply the product of theory, or of environmental idealism. Airlines have spent millions of dollars constructing wash racks for their airplanes, only to find that they produce too much contaminant run-off to be permitted to operate. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the late 1990s actually suspended operation of aircraft wash racks for this reason, at substantial cost to the owners.
Even if modifications to large, commercial airliner sized wash racks are eventually achieved to adequately address the toxic run-off problems (no solutions have surfaced in the decade since open washing became illegal), the problems remain in association with cleaning aircraft of non-major carriers, such as those of smaller, commuter airlines and private planes. These planes must be cleaned, but in most cases will not likely have access to the wash racks which may have been modified to meet EPA standards, and certainly cannot afford to construct their own acceptable wash racks. Hand washing of a plane, much in the manner of washing a car in one's front yard, will likely result in EPA fines.
New apparatuses (not costing millions of dollars) and new methods for cleaning aircraft, and not producing illegal run-off and ground contamination, simply do not exist, yet are desperately needed.
The gravity of the present situation is revealed by the present practices of a prominent freight airline. Because of their inability to wash their planes in any conventional manner, yet also because of their concern for aesthetics, present practice is for their maintenance contractors to smear liquid car was over the surfaces of the aircraft, allow it to dry, and then hand wipe the dried residue.
This astoundingly archaic method for “cleaning” an aircraft is not merely inefficient. While no one (the EPA, at least) seems to have yet noticed, the very environmental contamination that was to be avoided through liquid run-off is now occurring (with the addition of the dried car wax) in dry, powder form, as the residue, at least in part, blows from the cleaning area as the wiping takes place. Furthermore, this method of “cleaning” an aircraft is very damaging to aircraft paint. Because the aircraft is not washed, then waxed, this method of smearing liquid wax onto the dirty airplane, and wiping the dried residue away amounts to very nearly wiping sand paper over the painted surfaces—the abrasive dirt is trapped in the wax residue and abrades the surfaces as it is “buffed” away. This same freight airline mentioned before has noted that their paint jobs (costing over $100,000 each) are lasting not more than half of the normal service life expectancy).
It is needed is a method for cleaning aircraft in particular with a liquid cleaning agent (to provide the necessary damage-preventing lubricant which is absent in a true dry cleaning approach),yet avoid prohibited run-off associated with conventional washing. Also needed is a device which can effectively carry out such cleaning on surfaces that are not planer or smooth (such as aircraft surfaces with rivet lines, etc.).
This latter point is relevant to the fact that liquid and vacuum cleaning combinations are known. It is believed that some companies, for example, sell floor or even window cleaners which include squeegees associated with a vacuum orifice which is designed to remove soil-laden cleaning fluid from a to-be-cleaned surface. However, experimentation with such concepts in the present form reveals that the use of conventional squeegee blades in any combination with vacuum devices will not work effectively with aircraft with their varying surface textures and contours.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a novel and unobvious apparatus useful in cleaning soiled, exterior surfaces.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a novel and unobvious apparatus useful in cleaning soiled, exterior surfaces, which apparatus collects removed contaminants and cleaning solutions for environmentally appropriate disposal.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a novel and unobvious method for cleaning soiled, exterior surfaces.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a novel and unobvious method for cleaning soiled, exterior surfaces, which apparatus collects removed contaminants and cleaning solutions for environmentally appropriate disposal.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a novel and unobvious method for cleaning soiled, aircraft surfaces.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a novel and unobvious method for cleaning soiled, aircraft surfaces, which apparatus collects removed contaminants and cleaning solutions for environmentally appropriate disposal.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an apparatus which, by combining a modified squeegee design, cleaning solution application means and a vacuum apparatus, effectively cleans soiled surfaces, particularly exterior aircraft surfaces, without appreciable run-off or remaining residue after use.
In satisfaction of these and related objectives, Applicant's present invention provides a method and apparatus for cleaning exterior surfaces, particularly aircraft exteriors, which method and apparatus applies cleaning solution to a soiled surface, provides means for scouring the wetted surface, effectively squeegees the contaminated solution from the surface and evacuates it through a vacuum manifold for collection and environmentally appropriate disposal. The squeegee components of the present design are designed such that they uniquely accommodate the irregular surfaces which are typical of those of aircraft exteriors in riveted and seamed areas.
Applicant's method and apparatus are designed, not only to alleviate the problem of toxic run-off and ground water pollution as attends present-day wash-rack or bucket and brush type washing operations, but also to provide speed and efficiency in aircraft cleaning operations. An aircraft may be cleaned in any location without the necessity of removing the aircraft to a maintenance facility. Applicant's method and apparatus are also useful for other exterior surfaces, such as for cleaning motor vehicle, building, boat, and even skyscraper surfaces.
Applicant's invention includes an apparatus (hereinafter referred to as a “cleaning system” or simply “system”) which operates through the forced application of cleaning solutions onto surfaces which are to be cleaned and, (optionally) after agitation of the cleaning solutions over the soiled surface, recovery of the cleaning solution/contaminant mixture through action of squeegee-like collection means in association with vacuum or suction orifices.
Referring in combination to
Use of the present cleaning system involves producing a spray of cleaning solution. This is achieved by way of nozzles 12 through actuation of respectively assigned solenoid valve control buttons on a control panel 15 which is positioned for convenient operation by a user.
Nose plate 18 of head unit 10 defines an interior vacuum manifold 22 which opens at the distal end 24 of the head units 10 as a vacuum orifice 26. Research indicates that, while other embodiments do still provide many of the benefits described herein, optimal cleaning solution recovery by the system's vacuum feature is achieved when vacuum orifice 26 occupies no more than approximately one-half of the would-be surface area of the distal end 24 of nose plate 18, as lies between the hereafter-described squeegees. Such restriction of airflow via the vacuum orifice is believed to accelerate the air flow produced by operation of the wet/dry vacuum unit 60, to thereby enhance the “suction” of soil-laden cleaning solution.
Vacuum manifold 22 is configured at its proximal end 28 for sealed communication with a vacuum conduit 30. Vacuum conduit 30 is connected, directly or indirectly, to wet/dry vacuum unit 60 (shown in
The heart of the present invention lies in the squeegee arrangement and configuration relative to head unit 10 generally, and vacuum orifice 26 in particular. To facilitate the near complete removal of the soil-laden cleaning solution/contaminant mixture from an aircraft's skin surfaces and collection through vacuum orifice 26, a first, serrated squeegee blade 39 and a secondary squeegee blade 40 are affixed on either side of the elongate vacuum orifice 26.
The serrated (or “pinked”) squeegee blade 39 has proven to be particularly beneficial in rendering the present system effective in the context of cleaning slightly irregular surfaces, such as those of aircraft.
The use of conventional, straight blade squeegee blades in place of the present serrated squeegee blade 39 leaves considerable traces of soil-laden cleaning solution, and at best leaves streaks, notwithstanding action of secondary squeegee blade 40. Serrated squeegee blade 39 has been shown to facilitate a smooth gliding action over the aircraft skin surface, particularly with respect to areas having rivets and other surface irregularities (the same is true of other, non-aircraft surfaces tested). This gliding action, as opposed to the “bumpy” movement experienced without serrated squeegee blade 39 aids in maintaining a consistency of suction force with a resulting consistency of liquid removal through vacuum orifice 26, as well as maximizing the mechanical wiping effect of the blade. All of this arises from the ability of the serrated margin of serrated squeegee blade 39 to accommodate surface irregularities without substantially deforming the blade to the point of being ineffective in its wiping action adjacent such irregularities, or unduly breaking the “seal” as is required for optimal action of the vacuum orifice 26.
The serrations of squeegee blade 39 are to be at its narrow edge as contacts a to-be-cleaned surface (as shown in the drawings). Experimentation reveals that serrations, ridges, etc. which might be positioned along the broad edge of a squeegee blade (not shown in the drawings), and which only substantially contact the surface by distorting the blade through pressure toward the to-be-cleaned surface, are not remotely as effective in this context as those shown for the present invention.
Referring principally to
Referring principally to
In any preferred embodiment, the actual scouring pad 35 itself is removably attached to a platform surface 33 of head unit 10 through hook and eye (i.e. VELCRO) attachment. This facilitates rapid and convenient change out of pads 35 as they wear or become excessively soiled during a cleaning operation.
Referring again to
In any preferred embodiment, the actual buffing pad 52 is removably attached to a platform surface 54 of head unit 10 through hook and eye (i.e. VELCRO) attachment. This facilitates rapid and convenient change out of pads 52 as they wear or become excessively soiled during a cleaning operation.
Referring principally to
Also, the distal portion of head unit 10 is detachable at juncture 36 from the remainder thereof whereby the unit, while collecting soil-laden cleaning solution, may be moved away from the user, in a pushing action (as in
Actual use of Applicant's system is straight forward. When cleaning a surface above or beside which the head unit 10 approaches, a user first actuates the appropriate control button of control panel 15 to produce a cleaning solution spray through nozzle 14 in order to cover a surface area with cleaning solution. Scrub pad 35 may then be used to scour the surface and dislodge debris. Next, having actuated the vacuum unit 32, the user moves the system portion with serrated squeegee blade 39 and secondary squeegee blade 40 over the cleaned surface to collect the soil-laden cleaning solution, having head unit 10 configured and moving in a direction whereby serrated squeegee blade 39 passes over the surface first, followed by secondary squeegee blade 40.
Finally, the unit is either rotated slightly (as in the preferred mode shown in
Referring to
All but minuscule amounts of the contaminated cleaning solution are recovered into the vacuum unit, with negligible environmental exposure to the waste product.
Cleaning solutions which have proven ideal for use with applicant's system are those available from Aero Cosmetics, LLC of San Antonio, Tex. under the trademark WASHWAXALL.
Referring to
Referring to
Although the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, this description is not meant to be construed in a limited sense. Various modifications of the disclosed embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments of the inventions will become apparent to persons skilled in the art upon the reference to the description of the invention. It is, therefore, contemplated that the appended claims will cover such modifications that fall within the scope of the invention.
This is a continuation-in-part application in respect of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/434,439, filed 08 May 2003 from which, as applicable, priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. §120 and under provisions of the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US04/14497 | 5/10/2004 | WO | 11/6/2005 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10434439 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10555906 | Nov 2005 | US |