Patent Grant
10113114
The present disclosure relates to an apparatus and a method for coating a particulate material. The apparatus and method may each in one form be applied to the coating of landscaping materials, such as mulch or potting soil.
Apparatus and methods for coating landscaping materials and particulate ground cover materials are known. Winistorfer et al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,551,401, shows and describes a machine for coloring landscaping materials, such as wood mulch and the like. The apparatus in Winistorfer patent may be used for continuous mixing of the colorant with the mulch material within a multistage mixing bowl. The disclosure in this prior patent is incorporated herein by reference.
Greenberg et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,910,514, describes a colored rubber material formed to simulate wood mulch.
Rondy U.S. Pat. No. 5,192,587 describes the use of a continuous auger screw within an angled trough for applying colorant to mulch materials. Other apparatus and methods are known for coating of materials, including wood and rubber particulate material. Various methods may be performed as a continuous process or on a batch basis.
The modification of landscape materials is even more important when it comes to the functional modification of landscape materials because landscape materials as particulate ground cover materials may be used for improving water retention of the soil and can help to maintain, improve or even restore the fertility of soil thereby contributing to better plant growth and higher crop yields. Accordingly, there is continued interest in improved methods for providing functional treatments of landscape materials.
One important aspect for functional modification of landscape materials is the exact and consistent application of functional materials to landscape materials. It is especially difficult to apply the functional material as uniform as possible to the landscape material. Therefore, improved processes that allow more uniform functional treatment of landscape material would be of great benefit in the field of coating landscape materials.
In one aspect of the disclosure, a method of applying a functional additive to a particulate landscaping material includes feeding a particulate landscaping material into a mixing chamber and delivering a flow of additive mixture to a plurality of spray nozzles within the mixing chamber. The additive mixture includes a functional additive and a carrier. At least one of the plurality of nozzles is operated to direct an atomized spray of additive mixture into the mixing chamber for contact with particulate landscaping material in the mixing chamber. The particulate landscaping material is agitated within the mixing chamber at least one of during and after directing the atomized spray of additive mixture into the mixing chamber. The particulate landscaping material is conveyed with the additive mixture applied thereto to a mixing chamber outlet. During the feeding, delivering, operating, agitating and conveying steps, a volumetric flow rate of the particulate landscape material through the mixing chamber is intermittently determined. The determined volumetric flow rate of the particulate landscape material is intermittently compared to a predetermined target flow rate of the particulate landscape material. Based on this comparison, the volumetric flow rate of the particulate landscape material through the mixing chamber is adjusted.
As used herein, mulch is referred to as a material that is applied as a layer to the surface of an area of soil, often around or in the vicinity of one or more plants. The mulch can be used to conserve moisture, improve fertility and health of the soil, reduce weed growth, and enhance visual appeal of the area. Potting soil is a mixture of organic material, drainage material, water retention, and pest resistant material, as well as the necessary nutrients that is applied as substrate in which to grow plants. The potting soil can be used to conserve moisture, improve fertility and health of the soil and to provide the optimal growing substrate for plants. For purposes of this application, it is understood that “mulch” means any material applied to the surface of an area of soil for any number of purposes, including plant growth enhancement, moisture conservation, improvement of soil health and fertility, weed growth reduction, or visual appeal enhancement. Mulch can include any type of biodegradable natural fiber, including wood, paper, grass, hay, straw, pellets, organic residues, rubber, plastic, or rock and gravel. In certain embodiments, the mulch can be wood mulch from wood of any type, including hardwood, softwood, or recycled wood. The wood mulch can be ground wood mulch of any grind size or mix of grind sizes or chipped wood mulch of any chip size or mix of chip sizes. The pellet mulch can be made up of natural fiber pellets or any other known pellet for a mulch product. According to certain implementations, the organic residue mulch can be made of grass clippings, leaves, hay, straw, shredded bark, whole bark nuggets, sawdust, shells, woodchips, shredded newspaper, cardboard, or any other known organic residue used in mulch products. In one embodiment, the rubber mulch can be made from recycled tire rubber or any other known type or source of rubber that is used in mulch products. Further, the plastic sheet mulch can be any known mulch product in the form of a plastic sheet, including, for example, the type of plastic sheet mulch used in large-scale vegetable farming. In certain embodiments, mulch is any functional ground cover.
For purposes of this application, it is understood that “potting soil” also known as potting mix, or potting compost, means any material or medium in which to grow plants. Some common ingredients used in potting soil are peat, composted bark, soil, sand, sandy loam (combination of sand, soil and clay), perlite or vermiculate and recycled mushroom compost or other aged compost products although many others are used and the proportions vary hugely. Most commercially available potting soils have their pH fine-tuned with ground limestone, some contain small amounts of fertilizer and slow-release nutrients. Potting soil recipes are known e.g. from US 2004/0089042 A1. Commercially available potting soil is sterilized, in order to avoid the spread of weeds and plant-borne diseases. Packaged potting soil often is sold in bags ranging from 1 to 50 kg.
Other features and combinations of features will become apparent from the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show forms that are presently preferred. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show forms that are presently preferred. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings.
In the figures, where like numerals identify like elements, there is shown an embodiment of an apparatus for performing a process for mixing particulate material with a coating. The mixing apparatus is designated generally by the numeral 10 in
The material stored in the storage means 16, 18 is generally contemplated to be in a liquid or slurry form. Coatings may comprise any material that is applied to the particulate to provide a functional attribute. However, functional materials according to the present invention do not include colorants.
A functional additive or (coating) material may be combined with other coating materials or may form the coating by itself. A functional additive according to the present invention is typically a material that provides a functional attribute, such as encouraging or deterring plant growth, controlling insects or other pests, controlling the advancement of fungi, etc. Preferred functional materials according to the present invention are therefore herbicides, insecticides, nutrients, wetting agents, surfactants, fungicides, biologicals, inoculants and mixtures thereof.
Preferred herbicides to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
Especially preferred herbicides are pendimethalin, dimethenamid and the combination thereof.
The herbicide is preferably present in the functional coating of the particulate material, preferably mulch, in an amount of 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight, more preferably 0.0005 to 0.05% by weight, and even more preferably 0.001 to 0.01% by weight based on the particulate material.
Preferred insecticides to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
Even more preferred insecticides to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
The most preferred insecticides to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
The insecticide is preferably present in the functional coating of the particulate material, preferably mulch, in an amount of 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight, more preferably 0.0005 to 0.01% by weight, and even more preferably 0.001 to 0.006% by weight based on the particulate material.
Preferred fungicides to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
A) Respiration Inhibitors:
B) Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitors (SBI Fungicides):
C) Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors:
D) Inhibitors of Cell Division and Cytoskeleton:
E) Inhibitors of Amino Acid and Protein Synthesis:
F) Signal Transduction Inhibitors:
G) Lipid and Membrane Synthesis Inhibitors:
H) Inhibitors with Multi Site Action:
I) Cell Wall Synthesis Inhibitors:
J) Plant Defence Inducers:
K) Unknown Mode of Action:
Even more preferred fungicides to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
A) Respiration Inhibitors:
B) Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitors (SBI Fungicides):
C) Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors:
D) Inhibitors of Cell Division and Cytoskeleton:
F) Signal Transduction Inhibitors:
G) Lipid and Membrane Synthesis Inhibitors:
H) Inhibitors with Multi Site Action:
I) Unknown Mode of Action:
The most preferred fungicides to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
A) Respiration Inhibitors:
B) Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibitors (SBI Fungicides):
C) Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors:
D) Inhibitors of Cell Division and Cytoskeleton:
G) Lipid and Membrane Synthesis Inhibitors:
H) Inhibitors with Multi Site Action:
I) Unknown Mode of Action:
The fungicide is preferably present in the functional coating of the particulate material, preferably mulch, in an amount of 0.0001 to 0.1% by weight, more preferably 0.0005 to 0.05% by weight, and even more preferably 0.001 to 0.01% by weight based on the particulate material.
Inoculant compositions according to the present invention comprise microorganisms which have a beneficial effect on plants, preferably the growth of plants. Preferred inoculants to be used in the process according to the present invention include compositions comprising the following microorganisms and combinations thereof:
Bacteria of the genera Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Pasteuria, Azotobacter, Enterobacter, Azospirillum, Methylobacterium, Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae), and mycorrhizal fungae. Preferred biologicals to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
Biochemical compounds selected from the groups consisting of geraniol, cuminaldehyde, vanillin, borneol, menthol, anethole, terpineol, limonene, citronellol, eugenol, isoeugenol, linalool, phenylethyl alcohol, most preferably geraniol, Quillay extract-based products (e.g. QL Agri 35, BASF SE), Agrobacterium radiobacter K1026 (e. g. NoGall® from BASF Agricultural Specialties Pty Ltd, Australia), A. radiobacter K84(Nature 280, 697-699, 1979; e. g. GallTroll® from AG Biochem, Inc., C, USA), Ampelomyces quisqualis M-10 (e. g. AQ 10® from Intrachem Bio GmbH & Co. KG, Germany), Ascophyllum nodosum (Norwegian kelp, Brown kelp) extract or filtrate (e. g. ORKA GOLD from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa; or Goemar® from Laboratoires Goemar, France), Aspergillus flavus NRRL 21882 isolated from a peanut in Georgia in 1991 by USDA, National Peanut Research Laboratory (e. g. in Afla-Guard® from Syngenta, CH), mixtures of Aureobasidium pullulans DSM 14940 and DSM 14941 (e. g. blastospores in BlossomProtect® from bio-ferm GmbH, Germany), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 (e. g. in RhizoVital® 42 from AbiTEP GmbH, Berlin, Germany), B. amyloliquefaciens IN937a (J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17(2), 280-286, 2007; e. g. in BioYield® from Gustafson LLC, TX, USA), B. amyloliquefaciens IT-45 (CNCM I 3800) (e. g. Rhizocell C from ITHEC, France), B. amyloliquefaciens TJ1000 (also called 1BE; ATCC BAA-390; e.g. QuickRoots™ from TJ Technologies, Watertown, S. Dak., USA; CA 2471555 A1), B. amyloliquefaciens ssp. plantarum MBI600 (NRRL B-50595, deposited at USDA) (e. g. Integral®, Subtilex® NG from BASF Corp., USA), B. cereus CNCM I-1562 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,690), B. firmus CNCM I-1582 (WO 2009/126473, WO 2009/124707, U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,690; Votivo® from Bayer Crop Science LP, USA), Bacillus pumilus, B. pumilus GB34 (ATCC 700814; e. g. in YieldShield® from Gustafson LLC, TX, USA), and Bacillus pumilus KFP9F (NRRL B-50754) (e. g. in BAC-UP or FUSION-P from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), B. pumilus QST 2808 (NRRL B 30087) (e. g. Sonata® and Ballad® Plus from AgraQuest Inc., USA), Bacillus subtilis, B. subtilis strain FB17 [was originally isolated from red beet roots in North America (System Appl. Microbiol 27 (2004) 372-379, incorporated herein by reference); deposited at American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, Va., USA, under accession number PTA-11857 on Apr. 26, 2011; FB17 strain is also referred to as UD1022 or UD10-22 in some publications], B. subtilis CX-9060 (Federeal Register 77(7), 1633-1637; Certis U.S.A., L.L.C.), B. subtilis GB03 (e. g. Kodiak® or BioYield® from Gustafson, Inc., USA; or Companion® from Growth Products, Ltd., White Plains, N.Y. 10603, USA), B. subtilis GB07 (Epic® from Gustafson, Inc., USA), B. subtilis QST-713 (NRRL B 21661 in Rhapsody®, Serenade® MAX and Serenade® ASO from AgraQuest Inc., USA), B. subtilis var. amyloliquefaciens FZB24 (e. g. Taegro® from Novozyme Biologicals, Inc., USA), B. subtilis var. amyloliquefaciens D747 (FERM BP-8234; KR 100903253; e. g. Double Nickel™ 55 WDG or Double Nickel™ LC from Certis LLC, USA), Bacillus thuringiensis, B. thuringiensis ssp. aizawai ABTS-1857 (e. g. in XenTari® from BioFa AG, Münsingen, Germany), B. t. ssp. aizawai SAN 401 I, ABG-6305 and ABG-6346, Bacillus t. ssp. israelensis AM65-52 (e. g. in VectoBac® from Valent BioSciences, IL, USA), Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki SB4 (NRRL B-50753; e. g. Beta Pro® from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), B. t. ssp. kurstaki ABTS-351 identical to HD-1 (ATCC SD-1275; e. g. in Dipel® DF from Valent BioSciences, IL, USA), B. t. ssp. kurstaki EG 2348 (e. g. in Lepinox® or Rapax® from CBC (Europe) Sid., Italy), B. t. ssp. tenebrionis DSM 2803 (EP 0 585 215 B1; identical to NRRL B-15939; Mycogen Corp.), B. t. ssp. tenebrionis NB-125 (DSM 5526; EP 0 585 215 B1; also referred to as SAN 418 I or ABG-6479; former production strain of Novo-Nordisk), B. t. ssp. tenebrionis NB-176 (or NB-176-1; a gamma-irridated, induced high-yielding mutant of strain NB-125; DSM 5480; EP 585 215 Bl; Novodor® from Valent BioSciences, Switzerland), Beauveria bassiana ATCC 74040 (e. g. in Naturalis® from CBC (Europe) S.r.l., Italy), B. bassiana DSM 12256 (US 200020031495; e. g. BioExpert® SC from Live Sytems Technology S.A., Colombia), B. bassiana GHA (BotaniGard® 22WGP from Laverlam Int. Corp., USA), B. bassiana PPRI 5339 (ARSEF number 5339 in the USDA ARS collection of entomopathogenic fungal cultures; NRRL 50757) (e. g. BroadBand® from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), B. brongniartii (e. g. in Melocont® from Agrifutur, Agrianello, Italy, for control of cockchafer; J. Appl. Microbiol. 100(5), 1063-72, 2006), Bradyrhizobium sp. (e. g. Vault® from BASF Corp., USA), B. japonicum (e. g. VAULT® from BASF Corp., USA), Burkholderia sp. A396 (NRRL B-50319; WO 2013/032693; Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., USA), Candida oleophila 1-182 (NRRL Y-18846; e. g. Aspire® from Ecogen Inc., USA, Phytoparasitica 23(3), 231-234, 1995), C. oleophila strain O (NRRL Y-2317; Biological Control 51, 403-408, 2009), Candida saitoana (e. g. Biocure® (in mixture with lysozyme) and BioCoat® from Micro Flo Company, USA (BASF SE) and Arysta), chitosan (e. g. Armour-Zen® from BotriZen Ltd., NZ), Clonostachys rosea f. catenulata, also named Gliocladium catenulatum (e. g. isolate J 1446: Prestop® from Verdera Oy, Finland), Chromobacterium subtsugae PRAA4-1 isolated from soil under an eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) in the Catoctin Mountain region of central Maryland (e. g. in GRANDEVO from Marrone Bio Innovations, USA), Coniothyrium minitans CON/M/91-08 (DSM 9660; e. g. Contans® WG, Intercept® WG from Prophyta Biologischer Pflanzenschutz GmbH, Germany; WO 1996/021358), Cryphonectria parasitica (e. g. product Endothia parasitica from CNICM, France), Cryptococcus albidus (e. g. YIELD PLUS® from Anchor Bio-Technologies, South Africa), Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (Cr1eGV) (e. g. in CRYPTEX from Adermatt Biocontrol, Switzerland), Cydia pomonella granulovirus (CpGV) V03 (DSM GV-0006; e. g. in MADEX Max from Andermatt Biocontrol, Switzerland), CpGV V22 (DSM GV-0014; e. g. in MADEX Twin from Adermatt Biocontrol, Switzerland), Delftia acidovorans RAY209 (ATCC PTA-4249; WO 2003/57861; e. g. in BIOBOOST from Brett Young, Winnipeg, Canada), Dilophosphora alopecuri (Twist Fungus from BASF Agricultural Specialties Pty Ltd, Australia), Ecklonia maxima (kelp) extract (e. g. KELPAK SL from Kelp Products Ltd, South Africa), Flavobacterium sp. H492 (ATCC B-505584, WO 2013/138398), formononetin (e. g. in MYCONATE from Plant Health Care plc, U.K.), Fusarium oxysporum (e. g. BIOFOX® from S.I.A.P.A., Italy, FUSACLEAN® from Natural Plant Protection, France), Glomus intraradices (e. g. MYC 4000 from ITHEC, France), Glomus intraradices RTI-801 (e. g. MYKOS from Xtreme Gardening, USA or RTI Reforestation Technologies International; USA), grapefruit seeds and pulp extract (e. g. BC-1000 from Chemie S.A., Chile), harpin (alpha-beta) protein (e. g. MESSENGER or HARP-N Tek from Plant Health Care plc, U.K.; Science 257, 1-132, 1992), Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus (HearNPV) (e.g. in HELICOVEX from Adermatt Biocontrol, Switzerland), Heterorhabditis bacteriophaga (e. g. Nemasys® G from BASF Agricultural Specialities Limited, UK), Isaria fumosorosea Apopka-97 (ATCC 20874) (PFR-97TM from Certis LLC, USA), cis-jasmone (U.S. Pat. No. 8,221,736), laminarin (e. g. in VACCIPLANT from Laboratoires Goemar, St. Malo, France or Stähler SA, Switzerland), Lecanicillium longisporum KV42 and KV71 (e. g. VERTALEC® from Koppert BV, Netherlands), L. muscarium KV01 (formerly Verticillium lecanii) (e. g. MYCOTAL from Koppert BV, Netherlands), Lysobacter antibioticus 13-1 (Biological Control 45, 288-296, 2008), L. antibioticus HS124 (Curr. Microbiol. 59(6), 608-615, 2009), L. enzymogenes 3.1T8 (Microbiol. Res. 158, 107-115; Biological Control 31(2), 145-154, 2004), Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum IMI 330189 (isolated from Ornithacris cavroisi in Niger; NRRL 50758) (e. g. GREEN MUSCLE® from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), M. a. var. acridum FI-985 (e. g. GREEN GUARD® SC from BASF Agricultural Specialties Pty Ltd, Australia), M. anisopliae FI-1045 (e. g. BIOCANE® from BASF Agricultural Specialties Pty Ltd, Australia), M. anisopliae F52 (DSM 3884, ATCC 90448; e. g. MET52® Novozymes Biologicals BioAg Group, Canada), M. anisopliae ICIPE 69 (e. g. METATHRIPOL from ICIPE, Nairobe, Kenya), Metschnikowia fructicola (NRRL Y-30752; e. g. SHEMER® from Agrogreen, Israel, now distributed by Bayer CropSciences, Germany; U.S. Pat. No. 6,994,849), Microdochium dimerum (e. g. ANTIBOT® from Agrauxine, France), Microsphaeropsis ochracea P130A (ATCC 74412 isolated from apple leaves from an abandoned orchard, St-Joseph-du-Lac, Quebec, Canada in 1993; Mycologia 94(2), 297-301, 2002), Muscodor albus QST 20799 originally isolated from the bark of a cinnamon tree in Honduras (e. g. in development products Muscudor™ or QRD300 from AgraQuest, USA), Neem oil (e.g. TRILOGY®, TRIACT® 70 EC from Certis LLC, USA), Nomuraea rileyi strains SA86101, GU87401, SR86151, CG128 and VA9101, Paecilomyces fumosoroseus FE 9901 (e. g. NO FLY™ from Natural Industries, Inc., USA), P. lilacinus 251 (e. g. in BioAct®/MeloCon® from Prophyta, Germany; Crop Protection 27, 352-361, 2008; originally isolated from infected nematode eggs in the Philippines), P. lilacinus DSM 15169(e. g. NEMATA® SC from Live Systems Technology S.A., Colombia), P. lilacinus BCP2 (NRRL 50756; e. g. PL GOLD from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), mixture of Paenibacillus alvei NAS6G6 (NRRL B-50755) and Bacillus pumilus (e.g. BAC-UP from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), Pantoea vagans (formerly agglomerans) C9-1 (originally isolated in 1994 from apple stem tissue; BlightBan C9-1® from NuFrams America Inc., USA, for control of fire blight in apple; J. Bacteriol. 192(24) 6486-6487, 2010), Pasteuria sp. ATCC PTA-9643 (WO 2010/085795), P. nishizawae Pn1 (e.g. CLARIVA PN from Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greenborom; C, USA), Pasteuria sp. ATCC SD-5832 (WO 2012/064527), P. nishizawae (WO 2010/80169), P. penetrans (U.S. Pat. No. 5,248,500), P. ramose (WO 2010/80619), P. thornea (WO 2010/80169), P. usgae (WO 2010/80169), Penicillium bilaiae (e. g. Jump Start® from Novozymes Biologicals BioAg Group, Canada, originally isolated from soil in southern Alberta; Fertilizer Res. 39, 97-103, 1994), Phlebiopsis gigantea (e. g. RotStop® from Verdera Oy, Finland), Pichia anomala WRL-076 (NRRL Y-30842; U.S. Pat. No. 8,206,972), potassium bicarbonate (e. g. Amicarb® from Sta{umlaut over (h)}ler S A, Switzerland), Pseudozyma flocculosa PF-A22 UL (e. g. Sporodex® from Plant Products Co. Ltd., Canada), Pseudomonas sp. DSM 13134 (WO 2001/40441, e. g. in PRORADIX from Sourcon Padena GmbH & Co. KG, Hechinger Str. 262, 72072 Tübingen, Germany), P. chloraphis MA 342 (e. g. in CERALL or CEDEMON from BioAgri AB, Uppsala, Sweden), P. fluorescens CL 145A (e. g. in ZEQUANOX from Marrone BioInnovations, Davis, Calif., USA; J. Invertebr. Pathol. 113(1):104-14, 2013), Pythium oligandrum DV 74 (ATCC 38472; e. g. POLYVERSUM® from Remeslo SSRO, Biopreparaty, Czech Rep. and GOWAN, USA; US 2013/0035230), Reynoutria sachlinensis extract (e. g. REGALIA® SC from Marrone BioInnovations, Davis, Calif., USA), Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli (e. g. RHIZO-STICK from BASF Corp., USA), R. l. bv. trifolii RP113-7 (e. g. DORMAL from BASF Corp., USA; Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44(5), 1096-1101), R. l. bv. viciae P1NP3Cst (also referred to as 1435; New Phytol. 179(1), 224-235, 2008; e. g. in NODULATOR PL Peat Granule from BASF Corp., USA; or in NODULATOR XL PL from BASF Agricultural Specialties Ltd., Canada), R. l. bv. viciae SU303 (e. g. NODULAID Group E from BASF Agricultural Specialties Pty Ltd, Australia), R. l. bv. viciae WSM1455 (e. g. NODULAID Group F from BASF Agricultural Specialties Pty Ltd, Australia), Sinorhizobium meliloti MSDJ0848 (INRA, France) also referred to as strain 2011 or RCR2011 (Mol. Gen. Genomics 272, 1-17, 2004; e. g. DORMAL ALFALFA from BASF Corp., USA; NITRAGIN® Gold from Novozymes Biologicals BioAg Group, Canada), Sphaerodes mycoparasitica IDAC 301008-01 (WO 2011/022809), Spodoptera littoralis nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpliNPV) (e.g. in LITTOVIR from Adermatt Biocontrol, Switzerland), Steinernema carpocapsae (e. g. MILLENIUM® from BASF Agricultural Specialities Limited, UK), S. feltiae (NEMASHIELD® from BioWorks, Inc., USA; NEMASYS® from BASF Agricultural Specialities Limited, UK), S. kraussei L137 (NEMASYS® L from BASF Agricultural Specialities Limited, UK), Streptomyces griseoviridis K61 (e. g. MYCOSTOP® from Verdera Oy, Espoo, Finland; Crop Protection 25, 468-475, 2006), S. lydicus WYEC 108 (e. g. Actinovate® from Natural Industries, Inc., USA, U.S. Pat. No. 5,403,584), S. violaceusniger YCED-9 (e. g. DT-9® from Natural Industries, Inc., USA, U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,503), Talaromyces flavus V117b (e. g. PROTUS® from Prophyta, Germany), Trichoderma asperellum SKT-1 (e. g. ECO-HOPE® from Kumiai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Japan), T. asperellum ICC 012 (e. g. in TENET WP, REMDIER WP, BIOTEN WP from Isagro N.C., USA, BIO-TAM from AgraQuest, USA), T. atroviride LC52 (e. g. SENTINEL® from Agrimm Technologies Ltd, NZ), T. atroviride CNCM I-1237 (e. g. in Esquive WG from Agrauxine S.A., France, e. g. against pruning wound diseases on vine and plant root pathogens), T. fertile JM41R (NRRL 50759; e. g. TRICHOPLUS™ from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), T. gamsii ICC 080 (e. g. in TENET WP, REMDIER WP, BIOTEN WP from Isagro N.C., USA, BIO-TAM from AgraQuest, USA), T. harzianum T-22 (also called KRL-AG2; ATCC 20847; e. g. PLANTSHIELD® from BioWorks Inc., USA or SabrEx™ from Advanced Biological Marketing Inc., Van Wert, Ohio, USA; BioControl 57, 687-696, 2012), T. harzianum TH 35 (e. g. ROOT PRO® from Mycontrol Ltd., Israel), T. harzianum T-39 (e. g. TRICHODEX® and TRICHODERMA 2000® from Mycontrol Ltd., Israel and Makhteshim Ltd., Israel), mixture of T. harzianum and T. viride (e. g. TRICHOPEL from Agrimm Technologies Ltd, NZ), T. harzianum ICC012 and T. viride ICC080 (e. g. REMEDIER® WP from Isagro Ricerca, Italy), T. polysporum and T. harzianum (e. g. BINAB® from BINAB Bio-Innovation AB, Sweden), T. stromaticum (e. g. TRICOVAB® from C.E.P.L.A.C., Brazil), T. virens G1-3 (also called G1-3; ATCC 58678; e.g. QuickRoots™ from TJ Technologies, Watertown, S. Dak., USA; CA 2471555 A1), T. virens GL-21 (also called G1-21; U.S. Pat. No. 7,429,477 B2; e. g. SOILGARD® 12G from Certis LLC, USA, EPA Registration Number: 70051-3 and EPA Establishment Number: 067250-IL-001), T. virens G-41 (also called 041, #41X or ABM 127; isolated from soil samples taken from Aphanomyces-suppressive bean fields in Livingston County, New York; U.S. Pat. No. 4,996,157; e. g. ROOTSHIELD® PLUS from BioWorks, Inc., USA), T. viride (e. g. TRIECO® from Ecosense Labs. (India) Pvt. Ltd., Indien, BIO-CURE® F from T. Stanes & Co. Ltd., Indien), T. viride TV1 (e. g. T. viride TV1 from Agribiotec srl, Italy) and Ulocladium oudemansii HRU3 (e. g. in BOTRY-ZEN® from Botry-Zen Ltd, NZ).
Even more preferred biologicals to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 (e. g. in RhizoVital® 42 from AbiTEP GmbH, Berlin, Germany), B. amyloliquefaciens IN937a (J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17(2), 280-286, 2007; e. g. in BioYield® from Gustafson LLC, TX, USA), B. amyloliquefaciens IT-45 (CNCM I 3800) (e. g. Rhizocell C from ITHEC, France), B. amyloliquefaciens TJ1000 (also called 1BE; ATCC BAA-390; e.g. QuickRoots™ from TJ Technologies, Watertown, S. Dak., USA; CA 2471555 A1), B. amyloliquefaciens ssp. plantarum MBI600 (NRRL B-50595, deposited at USDA) (e. g. Integral®, Subtilex® NG from BASF Corp., USA), B. cereus CNCM I-1562 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,690), B. firmus CNCM I-1582 (WO 2009/126473, WO 2009/124707, U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,690; Votivo® from Bayer Crop Science LP, USA), B. pumilus GB34 (ATCC 700814; e. g. in YieldShield® from Gustafson LLC, TX, USA), and Bacillus pumilus KFP9F (NRRL B-50754) (e. g. in BAC-UP or FUSION-P from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), B. pumilus QST 2808 (NRRL B 30087) (e. g. Sonata® and Ballad® Plus from AgraQuest Inc., USA), B. subtilis CX-9060 (Federeal Register 77(7), 1633-1637; Certis U.S.A., L.L.C.), B. subtilis GB03 (e. g. Kodiak® or BioYield® from Gustafson, Inc., USA; or Companion® from Growth Products, Ltd., White Plains, N.Y. 10603, USA), B. subtilis GB07 (Epic® from Gustafson, Inc., USA), B. subtilis QST-713 (NRRL B 21661 in Rhapsody®, Serenade® MAX and Serenade® ASO from AgraQuest Inc., USA), B. subtilis var. amyloliquefaciens FZB24 (e. g. Taegro® from Novozyme Biologicals, Inc., USA), B. subtilis var. amyloliquefaciens D747 (FERM BP-8234; KR 100903253; e. g. Double Nickel™ 55 WDG or Double Nickel™ LC from Certis LLC, USA), Bradyrhizobium sp. (e. g. Vault® from BASF Corp., USA), B. japonicum (e. g. VAULT® from BASF Corp., USA), Burkholderia sp. A396 (NRRL B-50319; WO 2013/032693; Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., USA), Candida oleophila I-182 (NRRL Y-18846; e. g. Aspire® from Ecogen Inc., USA, Coniothyrium minitans CON/M/91-08 (DSM 9660; e. g. Contans® WG, Intercept® WG from Prophyta Biologischer Pflanzenschutz GmbH, Germany; WO 1996/021358), Paecilomyces fumosoroseus FE 9901 (e. g. NO FLY™ from Natural Industries, Inc., USA), P. lilacinus 251 (e. g. in BioAct®/MeloCon® from Prophyta, Germany; Crop Protection 27, 352-361, 2008; originally isolated from infected nematode eggs in the Philippines), P. lilacinus DSM 15169 (e. g. NEMATA® SC from Live Systems Technology S.A., Colombia), P. lilacinus BCP2 (NRRL 50756; e. g. PL GOLD from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), mixture of Paenibacillus alvei NAS6G6 (NRRL B-50755) and Bacillus pumilus (e.g. BAC-UP from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), Pasteuria sp. ATCC PTA-9643 (WO 2010/085795), P. nishizawae Pn1 (e.g. CLARIVA PN from Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greenborom; C, USA), Pasteuria sp. ATCC SD-5832 (WO 2012/064527), P. nishizawae (WO 2010/80169), P. penetrans (U.S. Pat. No. 5,248,500), P. ramose (WO 2010/80619), P. thornea (WO 2010/80169), P. usgae (WO 2010/80169), Penicillium bilaiae (e. g. Jump Start® from Novozymes Biologicals BioAg Group, Canada, originally isolated from soil in southern Alberta; Fertilizer Res. 39, 97-103, 1994), Pseudomonas sp. DSM 13134 (WO 2001/40441, e. g. in PRORADIX from Sourcon Padena GmbH & Co. KG, Hechinger Str. 262, 72072 Tübingen, Germany), P. chloraphis MA 342 (e. g. in CERALL or CEDEMON from BioAgri AB, Uppsala, Sweden), P. fluorescens CL 145A (e. g. in ZEQUANOX from Marrone BioInnovations, Davis, Calif., USA; J. Invertebr. Pathol. 113(1):104-14, 2013), Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli (e. g. RHIZO-STICK from BASF Corp., USA), R. l. bv. trifolii RP113-7 (e. g. DORMAL from BASF Corp., USA; Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44(5), 1096-1101), R. l. bv. viciae P1NP3Cst (also referred to as 1435; New Phytol. 179(1), 224-235, 2008; e. g. in NODULATOR PL Peat Granule from BASF Corp., USA; or in NODULATOR XL PL from BASF Agricultural Specialties Ltd., Canada), R. l. bv. viciae SU303 (e. g. NODULAID Group E from BASF Agricultural Specialties Pty Ltd, Australia), R. l. bv. viciae WSM1455 (e. g. NODULAID Group F from BASF Agricultural Specialties Pty Ltd, Australia), Sinorhizobium meliloti MSDJ0848 (INRA, France) also referred to as strain 2011 or RCR2011 (Mol. Gen. Genomics 272, 1-17, 2004; e. g. DORMAL ALFALFA from BASF Corp., USA; NITRAGIN® Gold from Novozymes Biologicals BioAg Group, Canada), Trichoderma asperellum SKT-1 (e. g. ECO-HOPE® from Kumiai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Japan), T. asperellum ICC 012 (e. g. in TENET WP, REMDIER WP, BIOTEN WP from Isagro N.C., USA, BIO-TAM from AgraQuest, USA), T. atroviride LC52 (e. g. SENTINEL® from Agrimm Technologies Ltd, NZ), T. atroviride CNCM I-1237 (e. g. in Esquive WG from Agrauxine S.A., France, e. g. against pruning wound diseases on vine and plant root pathogens), T. fertile JM41R (NRRL 50759; e. g. TRICHOPLUS™ from BASF Agricultural Specialities (Pty) Ltd., South Africa), T. gamsii ICC 080 (e. g. in TENET WP, REMDIER WP, BIOTEN WP from Isagro N.C., USA, BIO-TAM from AgraQuest, USA), T. harzianum T-22 (also called KRL-AG2; ATCC 20847; e. g. PLANTSHIELD® from BioWorks Inc., USA or SabrEx™ from Advanced Biological Marketing Inc., Van Wert, Ohio, USA; BioControl 57, 687-696, 2012), T. harzianum TH 35 (e. g. ROOT PRO® from Mycontrol Ltd., Israel), T. harzianum T-39 (e. g. TRICHODEX® and TRICHODERMA 2000® from Mycontrol Ltd., Israel and Makhteshim Ltd., Israel), mixture of T. harzianum and T. viride (e. g. TRICHOPEL from Agrimm Technologies Ltd, NZ), T. harzianum ICC012 and T. viride ICC080 (e. g. REMEDIER® WP from Isagro Ricerca, Italy), T. polysporum and T. harzianum (e. g. BINAB® from BINAB Bio-Innovation AB, Sweden), T. stromaticum (e. g. TRICOVAB® from C.E.P.L.A.C., Brazil), T. virens G1-3 (also called G1-3; ATCC 58678; e.g. QuickRoots™ from TJ Technologies, Watertown, S. Dak., USA; CA 2471555 A1), T. virens GL-21 (also called G1-21; U.S. Pat. No. 7,429,477 B2; e. g. SOILGARD® 12G from Certis LLC, USA, EPA Registration Number: 70051-3 and EPA Establishment Number: 067250-IL-001), T. virens G-41 (also called 041, #41X or ABM 127; isolated from soil samples taken from Aphanomyces-suppressive bean fields in Livingston County, New York; U.S. Pat. No. 4,996,157; e. g. ROOTSHIELD® PLUS from BioWorks, Inc., USA), T. viride (e. g. TRIECO® from Ecosense Labs. (India) Pvt. Ltd., Indien, BIO-CURE® F from T. Stanes & Co. Ltd., Indien), T. viride TV1 (e. g. T. viride TV1 from Agribiotec srl, Italy).
The most preferred biologicals to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
In another preferred embodiment, the biological to be used in the process according to the present invention is a biochemical compound selected from the group consisting of geraniol, cuminaldehyde, vanillin, borneol, menthol, anethole, terpineol, limonene, citronellol, eugenol, isoeugenol, linalool, phenylethyl alcohol, most preferably geraniol. These biochemical compounds can act as fragrances.
In another preferred embodiment, the biological 1 to be used in the process according to the present invention is Bacillus subtilis, most preferably B. subtilis strain FB 17.
The biological is present in the functional coating of the particulate material in an amount of 1×102 to 1×108 CFU/gram, preferably 1×103 to 1×107 CFU/gram, and even more preferably 5×103 to 5×105 CFU/gram based on the particulate material. In case the biological is a non-microbial, biochemical compound, the biological is present in the functional coating of the particulate material in an amount of 0.001 to 1.0% by weight, preferably 0.005 to 0.5% by weight, and even more preferably 0.01 to 0.1% by weight based on the particulate material.
Preferred nutrients to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
Preferred surfactants and/or wetting agents to be used in the process according to the present invention include the following substances and mixtures thereof:
The nutrients, surfactants and/or wetting agents are present in the functional coating of the particulate material in an amount of 0.001 to 1.0% by weight, preferably 0.005 to 0.5% by weight, and even more preferably 0.01 to 0.1% by weight based on the particulate material.
The functional additive or (coating) material according to the present invention may be optionally combined with other materials, like colorants. A colorant is a material containing a pigment or dye that is applied to change the color of the particulate material, preferably mulch. The colorant does not affect the functionalized treatment provided to the particulate material modified by the process according to the present invention. Additional optional materials may include aluminium silicate (Screen™ Duo from Certis LLC, USA) and/or potassium silicate (e. g. Sil-MATRIX™ from Certis LLC, USA).
A carrier may be added to the flow of the coating material. In a preferred process, the carrier is in liquid form, like water or glycerine or mixtures thereof. An especially preferred liquid carrier is water. A dry carrier is less preferred.
The carrier is preferably supplied separate from the coating material(s) within the storage means. A carrier material is typically mixed with the coating material to form a coating mixture. Generally, a coating mixture is defined as being a mixture of two or more materials, which may be selected from a group comprising functional additives and carriers.
Preferred dry carriers include clay, kaolin clay, sodium bicarbonate, and the like. In a further embodiment of the present invention, the carrier can be a composition of a polysiloxane, at least one polyalkylene glycol, and a co-product comprised of monopropylene glycol and a propylene oxide according to WO 2010/104912 A1. In another alternative of the present invention, the composition contains no carrier.
The storage means 16, 18 are connected with pumping means 24 for directing the coating material (etc.) to a coating delivery system (or application system, discussed further below) within the mixer 14. Any desired form of pump may be provided, with peristaltic pumps being one preferred form for delivering the coating materials. For the high pressure carrier flow, one pump example is a multi-stage pressure pump. Again, other pump forms may be utilized. A controller 20 is shown adjacent the pumping means 24 and the mixer 14. The pumping means or controller may be mounted on the frame of the mixer or otherwise located. The controller 20 may take any number of forms and be provided with various communication capabilities. The controller may perform one or more functions, such as remote operational monitoring and control, data extract, software update, general maintenance, etc. One possible example of a controller/control panel is an Allen Bradley Micrologix 1400 PLC sold by Rockwell Automation of Milwaukee, Wis.
A discharge mechanism 22 is provided at a discharge end of the mixer 14. The discharge mechanism 22 is shown as a belt conveyor and is intended to transport the coated particulate material away from the mixer 10 and direct it for further processing. Other processing steps, packaging operations or storage methods (not shown) may be utilized or added, as desired. A drive motor 26 is mounted on the mixer 14 for rotation of an agitating conveyor (discussed below) within the mixer 14. A hydraulic drive motor 28 is also provided as part of the feed means 12.
The feed means 12 comprises a hopper 32 having a floor forming a conveyor 30 for moving the particulate material deposited within the hopper 32 towards a discharge. The hopper 32 is connected with an inlet 42 for the mixer 14. Two baffles 36A, 36B are provided at the discharge end of the hopper 32. A web 35 formed from chains (or similar structures) extends across the open top of the hopper 32. The web 35 serves to disturb the particulate 34A deposited in the hopper 32 and assists in leveling the particulate 34A as it is moved by the conveyor 30 towards discharge.
In
One or more sensors 40 (two being shown) are provided between the baffles 36A, 36B to measure the height of the feed material 34A passing under the baffle 36A and through the gate 38. The signals from the sensors 40 are sent to the controller 20 and are used to calculate the cubic meters per minute (m3/min) feed rate into the mixer 14. The overall volumetric flow is a function of the incremental rate of the movement by the conveyor 30 multiplied by the width of the hopper (which is typically fixed) and the height of the particulate passing under the baffle 34A. For a relatively full hopper 32, the particulate 34A will have a maximum height defined by the bottom edge of the baffle 36A. The sensors 40 are contemplated to create a more accurate measurement of the height of the particulate 34A, particularly where the flow passes freely under the baffle 36A. In other embodiments (not shown), sensors may instead, or additionally, be positioned at or adjacent the exit of the mixer 14 for determining the flow rate of particulate material exiting the mixer.
After moving through the gate 38, the particulate feed 34A passes under the second baffle 36B (if provided) and falls into a mixer inlet 42 at the end of the conveyor 30. The mixer inlet 42 is connected with the mixer 14, having a defined mixing chamber therein. A trough 44 defines the base of the mixing chamber and extends along the longitudinal length of the mixer 14. A shaft 46 is provided for rotation of an agitating conveyor (discussed below). The trough 44 is divided into two sections 44A, 44B by a weir plate 48. The shaft 46 is mounted in the mixer 14 and is supported at each end by a bearing 52. A central support bearing 54 is also shown as mounted on top of the weir plate 48. The drive motor 26 is connected to the shaft 46 at the discharge end 50 of the mixer 14. A discharge opening 56 is provided in the mixer housing 58 at the discharge end 50 of the mixer 14. A discharge weir 60 is positioned at the end of the trough 44, adjacent the discharge opening 56.
A plurality of nozzles 62 are provided above the trough 44 and are shown to be positioned in the initial portion of the mixing chamber. The nozzles 62 are preferably aligned axially along the mixing chamber with a series of plenums and valves (discussed below) directing the constituent parts of a coating mixture to the nozzles 62. Other nozzle positions and alignments are possible. The nozzles 62 preferably convert the coating or coating mixture to an atomized spray 64. Further, the atomization of the coating or coating mixture is preferably created without the addition of a pressurized gas. The nozzles 62 direct the atomized spray 64 towards the mixing particulate 34B within the mixing chamber.
As generally illustrated by the arrows in
The feed means 12 is shown in more detail in
The slat conveyor 30 directs the feed material 34A towards the control gate 38 formed below the baffle 36A. The bottom edge of the baffle 36A defines the height of the gate 38, with the side walls of the hopper 32 and the conveyor slats 66 further defining the dimensions of the gate 38. The chain web 35 extends across the hopper 32 and is contemplated to be at least partially covered in normal operation by the accumulated particulate feed material 34A. As shown, the chain web is connected at various positions within the hopper 32 and to the baffle 36A. As the particulate feed 34A is moved by the conveyor 30 towards the gate 38, the pile of particulate 34A is subject to agitation and shearing forces, serving to break up and level the pile as it approaches the baffle 36A.
The position of the baffle 36A (and baffle 36B) may be adjusted to set the maximum volume of feed material 34A passing through the gate 38 during operation of the conveyor 30. The width of the gate 38 is contemplated to be fixed. The sensors 40 are positioned at the gate 38 to assist in the volumetric flow measurement for the feed material 34A passing through the gate 38 and into the inlet 42 of the mixer 14. The sensors 40 are contemplated to provide a more accurate height measurement; for example, to adjust for a particulate flow having a height less than the bottom edge of the baffle 34A. One possible sensor-type may be an ultrasonic sensor, such as those sold by Pepperl+Fuchs of Twinsburg, Ohio. The conveyor 30 and sensor 40 are contemplated to receive signals from and send signals to the controller 20. The signals are used by the controller 20 to operate the apparatus 10 and the controller 20 may be programmed to adjust the conveyor speed. Stroke length may be manually adjusted.
In
The spray 64 from the nozzles 62 is directed towards the particulate material 34B as it is lifted by the paddles 70 within the trough 44. The lifting and mixing action of the paddle blades 70 is illustrated by the arrow in
The center weir plate 48 is positioned within the trough 44 between the two trough sections 44A and 44B. The weir plate 48 serves to form an impediment to continuous flow through the trough 44 and thus increases retention of the mixing particulate 34B within the mixing chamber. The mixing particulate 34B will accumulate at the upstream side of the plate 48, prior to being lifted over the top edge of the weir 48 by the adjacent paddle blade(s) 70. As shown in
In one preferred construction, a total of sixteen arm positions may be provided along the shaft 46. A greater or lesser number of arm positions may be provided. It is further contemplated that the longitudinal position of the paddle arms 72 on the shaft 46 may be adjusted during set-up of the apparatus 10. For example, there may be provided a twenty centimeter adjustment along the shaft 46 for each paddle set. This adjustment of the paddle position may be used to affect material build-up within the mixing chamber, such as adjacent the upstream side of the weir plats 48, 60. The paddle blades 70 moving through this increased quantity of material may result in an increase in the overall load on the drive motor 26. Moving the arms 72, for example, a short distance away from the upstream side of weir plates (48, 60) may serve to reduce or eliminate unnecessary load while not significantly affecting agitation or conveyance by the agitator. Variation in the angular orientation of the paddle blades 70 within adjacent paddle sets may further serve to positively regulate the mixing and flow of the particulate 34B within the mixing chamber. Preferably, the direction of the paddle blades 70 and position of the paddle arms 72 on the shaft 46 creates a generally uniform flow and depth of material within the trough 44.
The controller 20 may further adjust the mixer operation by measurement of motor load. An increase in load on the agitator motor 26 may result form an increase in the overall amount of mixing particulate 34B within the trough 44. The controller 20 may adjust the feed rate of the conveyor 30 to return the particulate flow to a preferred range and motor load. An adjustment of the coating flow may also accompany the adjustment of the particulate feed rate into the mixing chamber. Adjustments to the rotational speed of the agitator may also be accomplished, although it is the preferred that such adjustments do not occur during the operation of the apparatus 10.
Details of the spray nozzles 62 and the spray pattern 64 within the mixing chamber are shown in
In
As illustrated, the contemplated spray pattern 64 is oval in shape and the adjacent nozzles are contemplated to create an overlapping pattern along the length of the trough portion 44A. Other spray patterns may be utilized as desired, in addition to variation in the number of spray nozzles. The plenum/manifold structures may be modified for directing flow to the nozzles. Multiple pump mechanisms may be provided in addition to metering means associated with the pumps. Additional plenums/manifolds may be provided for the further components of the coating mixture. For example, the properties of one or more a functional additives may necessitate their introduction into the mix at a position closely adjacent the nozzle. The materials may also require other special handling during delivery and mixing. It may also be advantageous in certain applications to provide other types of nozzles or other input structures to add materials, including coatings, carriers or otherwise, to the mixing particulate.
The discharge end 50 of the mixer 14 is shown in further detail in
An exploded assembly of the mixer 14 is shown in
Rod members 114 are provided on the outside of the first trough section 44A. The rod ends engage a connector 116 on the second trough section 44B to retain the two sections together. The center weir plate 48 may be fixed to either trough section 44A, 44B and is engaged between the sections when secured by the rods 114 and connectors 116. Engagement and disengagement of the rods 114 from the connectors 116 is contemplated to be accomplished from a position adjacent the end wall 118 of the trough section 44A, without the need to move into the housing 58.
During removal of the trough 44, means for supporting the shaft 46 may be required. As shown, the end bearing 52 is supported on the end wall 118 of the first trough section 44A. In
The clearance between the paddle blades 70 and the inside surface of the trough 44 is contemplated to be adjustable, for example, up to 10 centimeters (4 inches) or more. Such adjustments may serve to alter mix properties and to accommodate particulate material properties, such as particle size. The adjustment may also serve to reduce load on the drive motor (26) for the agitator. As shown in
Generally, the various components of the apparatus (10) are controlled by the main controller (20). Coating materials are retained within the storage means (16, 18), which are connected to the internal flow plenum (84). The pump (24) is provided for metering the coating flow (88) from storage into the plenum (84). A separate carrier feed is provided and is connected with the pump (24) to provide a flow (90) to the second plenum (86). It is contemplated that a provided coating material, such as a colorant, a functional additive, a combination thereof or a combination of two or more functional additives, will include a set recipe for mixing with the water (or other carrier) to form a coating mixture (e.g., a colorant mixture or an additive mixture). This recipe will normally include a coating-to-carrier ratio (e.g., a colorant-to carrier ratio or an additive-to-carrier ratio) and a coating mixture flow (or coating, e.g., colorant or additive) flow) based on volume of particulate fed into the mixer. For example, in one embodiment the recipe may call for a certain amount (e.g., lbs) of coating per cubic yard (or kg per cubic meter) of particulate material to be processed. The controller (20) will be set with the parameters of the recipe by manual input or by selection from memory. Identification of the coating material(s) may be manually entered into the controller or may be identified by other means, such as the reading of an RFID chip or a bar code associated with the provided storage means (16, 18).
The typical coating is contemplated to be a mixture of, at least, one coating material and a water carrier. However, a single coating material may be applied without additional additives or a carrier. In such applications, the coating material (or single source mixture) will preferably be delivered to the nozzles (62) through the relatively high pressure, second plenum (86). The pressurized flow (90A) into the nozzle (62) will result in an atomized spray (64) at the outlet orifice (82).
In one particularly suitable embodiment, the controller is operable to control various operational parameters of the apparatus such that the end product (e.g., the coated particulate material) has a ratio of coating material to particulate material that is within ±5% of the predetermined recipe, or more broadly a predetermined target ratio as defined by the recipe. Various sensors may be provided through the apparatus to provide the controller with operational parameters and information sufficient to allow the controller to operate the apparatus in a manner that achieves the desired coating or recipe accuracy. The sensor signals will normally be processed by the controller and further control signals provided to adjust the operational elements of the apparatus. For example, in one suitable embodiment the volumetric flow rate of particulate material through the mixer, and more suitably in the illustrated embodiment the volumetric flow rate of particulate material into the mixing chamber, is intermittently determined and compared to a predetermined target volumetric flow rate of the particulate material through the mixer. If necessary, based on this comparison, the volumetric flow rate of particulate material fed into the mixing chamber is adjusted, e.g., by increasing or decreasing the speed at which particulate material is moved toward the inlet to the mixing chamber, to achieve a volumetric flow rate that is more indicative of the target volumetric flow rate of particulate material.
One or more of the operating parameters relating to delivery of the coating mixture (e.g., an additive mixture) into the mixing chamber are adjustable as a function of the adjustment to the volumetric flow rate of particulate material to the mixing chamber. For example, the flow rate of coating material to each nozzle, the flow rate of the carrier to each nozzle, the flow rate of the coating mixture (e.g., an additive mixture) from each nozzle, and the number of nozzles from which the coating mixture is emitted may be adjusted based on an adjustment of the volumetric flow rate of particulate material into (or, more broadly, through) the mixing chamber. This functional control based on adjustment of the volumetric flow rate of particulate material further facilitates achieving the desired recipe accuracy, e.g., within ±5% of the target coating (e.g., additive) to particulate ratio of the end product.
In operation, signals from the particulate feed means are utilized to control coating flow to the nozzles. The volume of particulate feed (34A) directed through the gate (38) and into the inlet (42) for the mixing chamber is measured. For example, in one embodiment the sensors 40 are used to read the depth, or height of the particulate material flowing beneath the sensors, such as at a rate of about once every 0.1 seconds. The controller 20 uses an accumulation of these measurements to intermittently determine the volumetric flow rate of particulate material into the mixing chamber (e.g., based also on the fixed width of the flow and the known speed at which the flow is moved toward the mixing chamber). In one embodiment, volumetric flow rate is determined by the controller 20 at a frequency of about once every 5 seconds. This relatively high frequency facilitates achieving the desired accuracy of the operating volumetric flow rate and hence the recipe accuracy of the end product. It is understood that in other embodiments another suitable frequency may be used for determining the volumetric flow rate.
Based on the volume of particulate matter added to the mixing chamber, the amount of coating material/mixture delivered from the nozzles is adjusted to match the recipe for the coating. Further, the carrier material is delivered to the nozzle at a constant (high) pressure for purposes of creating the desired atomized spray. The coating material is provided in an amount to match the carrier flow for the recipe.
In one preferred example of the operation of the apparatus 10, a rough-ground hardwood material, preferably mulch, is provided to form a feed particulate 34A. A functional additive, preferably selected from herbicides, insecticides, nutrients, wetting agents, surfactants, biologicals, inoculants and mixtures thereof is provided in either one or multiple storage means 16. For instance, if a colorant and a plant growth regulator are used in the process, separate storage means will be used in the process. The storage means could be used for preparing individual or multiple functional coatings. A further additive, such as a colorant, plant growth regulator, fragrance, etc. may be provided in the second storage means 18. The functional material recipe is input into the controller 20. The recipe will normally define the mix ratio for the functional material and the carrier, preferably water, the amount of coating mixture for a given volume of particulate feed, pump settings, conveyor settings, etc. After priming of the apparatus 10 and initiation of rotation of the agitator shaft 46, particulate feed 34A is deposited into the hopper 32 and the slat conveyor 30 is placed in operation. The feed material 34A moves under the gate 38, with the sensors 40 measuring height of the material flow. From the sensor data and conveyor speed data, a volumetric flow rate is determined for the particulate directed to the inlet 42 of the mixer 14. The particulate flow rate is then related to the coating mixture delivered by the nozzles 62.
In the embodiment shown, eight nozzles 62 are provided for directing the coating mixture onto the particulate 34B within the mixing trough 44. In operation, the carrier flow 90A directed to the nozzles 62 is delivered at a relatively high pressure. The pressure range is contemplated to fall between 551.6 to 1034.3 kPa (80 to 150 psi) for a high pressure operation. In one embodiment, a particularly suitable pressure is about 689.5 kPa (100 psi)±172.4 kPa (±25 psi). In another suitable embodiment a particularly suitable pressure is about 861.8 kPa (125 psi)±172.4 kPa (±25 psi). As such, the carrier flow serves as the atomizing agent for the coating mixture. The pressure of the carrier is contemplated to be maintained relatively constant. In determining the overall flow of coating mixture onto the mixing particulate 34B, adjustment of the quantity of coating mixture delivered to the mixing chamber is accomplished by controlling the number of nozzles in operation at any give time. The valves 94, 100 may be adjusted by the controller 20 to turn off a select number of nozzles 62. As an example, normal feed rates for the apparatus may result in the use of six nozzles 62, with two being turned off by the controller 20. An increase in demand for coating material will result in additional nozzles being turned on. A decrease in the particulate feed rate will result in additional nozzles being turned off
Nozzle adjustment is based on the volume of particulate fed into the mixing chamber and the coating recipe. The recipe will at a minimum be set to the kilograms per minute (kg/min) of coating and a corresponding liters per minute (l/min) of the carrier for a particulate feed rate in cubic meters per minute (m3/min). Measuring the pressure of the carrier flow is correlated to the l/min of carrier delivered to the nozzles. In keeping the pressure of the carrier constant (i.e., within a preset range), the carrier flow through each nozzle is relatively constant. On an increasing demand for coating mixture (due to an increase in volumetric particulate feed rate), additional carrier and coating is required. The controller determines the additional coating needs feed and initiates operation of one or more additional nozzles. The addition of operational nozzles is combined with an adjustment of the pumps 24, feeding the coating material from the storage means 16 (and/or 18) and the carrier (water) from its associated supply. The carrier pump is also adjusted through the controller 20 to maintain the pressure of the flow 90 within the preset range delivered to the nozzles 62 in operation.
The spray pattern 64 from the nozzles 62 preferably directs the coating mixture onto the particulate 34B along the first half of the longitudinal length of the trough 44. The speed of the agitator shaft 46, the position and number of paddle blades 70, the size and position of the weir plates 48, 60 all serve to affect the overall mixing and conveying operation and the further overall residence time of the mixing particulate within the trough 44. It is contemplated that the nozzles 62 being adjusted on and off will be typically located adjacent the central weir plate 48. Hence, the application of coating mixture by the nozzles will occur at the initial part of the mixing chamber with agitation continuing to occur in the downstream end of the trough 44. Other nozzle positions and alignments may be utilized to regulate flow, as well as to maintain a relatively consistent mixture between the coating materials and (any) carrier delivered by the various nozzles.
The controller 20 maintains the flow of coating by adjustment of the provided pump(s) 24 connected to the storage means 16, 18. For example, the storage means 16, 18 in which the coating (e.g., colorant or additive) is stored may be provided with a scale to determine (e.g., as the volumetric particulate flow rate is determined) the weight of the coating material and hence an actual volumetric flow rate of the coating material from the storage means to the nozzles. The actual volumetric flow rate of the coating material is compared to a theoretical volumetric flow rate (e.g., based on the volumetric flow rate of the particulate material into the mixing chamber). The weight change of the stored coating material may thus be used to create a correction to the pump operation, based on the desired recipe. Other forms of measurement for the concentrate may also be used. Adjustments based on manual or sensor input, may be made during operation through the controller 20. Further, adjustments to the particulate feed provided by the conveyor 30 may be accomplished during processing to affect the overall coating operation. Generally, a change in the particulate feed rate delivered to the mixing chamber will vary the load on the agitator and may used to bring the coating mixture feed in line with a desired performance range.
The use of a pressurized carrier flow as an atomizer for a coating mixture is contemplated to create a number of advantages. First, a separate gas compressor for gas (air) atomization of the spray is not required. The elimination of the gas compressor reduces the overall power requirements for the apparatus. In addition, it has been found that the controlled nozzle feed and carrier atomized spray may reduce the overall requirements for carrier, preferably water, and the coating material. This reduction in coating use may result in part from the relatively larger atomized particles formed by the carrier atomized coating mixture, as compared to the coating particles formed through a gas atomization process. The relatively larger particles improve distribution of the coating through a higher impact (a function of the mass of the particle and the speed at impact). Ultimately, the use of less of the water or other carrier, within a relatively faster mixing operation, reduces processing time for the coated particulate after discharge from the apparatus. For example, because of the overall use of less water, the coated particulate may be moved more quickly to a bagging operation. An extended mixing (retention time) within the overall operation may further result in better adhesion of the coating and relatively uniform coating of the particulate. Other advantages are contemplated and may be apparent to those of skill in the relevant art after reviewing the present disclosure.
The process for coating particulate material according to the present invention is particularly suited for the preparation of functionalized coatings on mulch material, preferably obtained from wood. In other words, mulch is a preferred particulate material.
The term “mulch” as used in the present invention relates to any material applied to the surface of an area of soil for any number of purposes, including plant growth enhancement, moisture conservation, improvement of soil health and fertility, weed growth reduction, or visual appeal enhancement. Mulch can include any type of ground cover, including wood, paper, grass, hay, straw, pellets, organic residues, rubber, plastic, or rock and gravel.
In certain embodiments, the mulch can be wood mulch from wood of any type, including hard wood, softwood, or recycled wood. The wood mulch can be ground wood mulch of any grind size or mix of grind sizes or chipped wood mulch of any chip size or mix of chip sizes. The pellet mulch can be made up of natural fiber pellets or any other known pellet for a mulch product.
According to certain implementations, the organic residue mulch can be made of grass clippings, leaves, hay, straw, shredded bark, whole bark nuggets, sawdust, shells, woodchips, shredded newspaper, cardboard, or any other known organic residue used in mulch products. In one embodiment, the rubber mulch can be made from recycled tire rubber or any other known type or source of rubber that is used in mulch products. Further, the plastic sheet mulch can be any known mulch product in the form of a plastic sheet, including, for example, the type of plastic sheet mulch used in large-scale vegetable farming. In certain embodiments, mulch is any functional ground cover.
Another alternative particulate material that is coated by use of the process according to the present invention for providing a functionalized coating is potting soil.
It is understood that “potting soil” also known as potting mix, or potting compost, means any material or medium in which to grow plants. Some common ingredients used in potting soil are peat, composted bark, soil, sand, sandy loam (combination of sand, soil and clay), perlite or vermiculate and recycled mushroom compost or other aged compost products although many others are used and the proportions vary hugely. Most commercially available potting soils have their pH fine-tuned with ground limestone, some contain small amounts of fertilizer and slow-release nutrients. Potting soil recipes are known e.g. from US 2004/0089042 A1. Commercially available potting soil is sterilized, in order to avoid the spread of weeds and plant-borne diseases. Packaged potting soil often is sold in bags ranging from 1 to 50 kg.
The coated particulate material comprising the functional coating as obtained by the process according to the present invention can be applied as a layer to the soil around or in the vicinity of any number of different types of plants. For example, in one implementation, the composition can be applied to common landscape plants, including, but not limited to, trees, shrubs, woody ornamentals, herbaceous perennials, ornamental grasses and ground covers, ornamental bedding plants, vegetables, as well as plants grown for their fruits like blueberry, strawberry and raspberry. Further, it is understood that the coated particulate material obtained by the process according to the present invention can be applied to any known plant that benefits from application of mulch. Alternatively, the composition can be applied as a layer to bare soil (where no plants are present). Alternatively, the mulch composition can be applied as a layer to soil in the vicinity of a location where a plant is to be grown (e.g. plant propagation material is sown). In one embodiment, the mulch composition is applied to the soil as a layer having a thickness ranging from about 0.5 to about 15 cm. Alternatively, the layer has a thickness ranging from about 2.5 to about 10 cm. In a further alternative, the layer has a thickness of at least 5 cm.
According to one embodiment, the coated particulate material obtained by the process according to the present invention can be applied to soil and/or into a container, followed by planting one or more growing plants within the potting soil composition or sowing one or more plant propagation materials within the potting soil composition.
The terms “plant”, or “plants” as used herein are to be understood as including but not be limited to cultivated plants, such as cereals, e. g. wheat, rye, barley, triticale, oats or rice; beet, e. g. sugar beet or fodder beet; fruits, such as pomes, stone fruits or soft fruits, e. g. apples, pears, plums, peaches, almonds, cherries, strawberries, raspberries, blackberries or gooseberries; leguminous plants, such as lentils, peas, alfalfa or soybeans; oil plants, such as rape, mustard, olives, sunflowers, coconut, cocoa beans, castor oil plants, oil palms, ground nuts or soybeans; cucurbits, such as squashes, cucumber or melons; fiber plants, such as cotton, flax, hemp or jute; citrus fruit, such as oranges, lemons, grapefruits or mandarins; vegetables, such as spinach, lettuce, asparagus, cabbages, carrots, onions, tomatoes, potatoes, cucurbits or paprika; lauraceous plants, such as avocados, cinnamon or camphor; energy and raw material plants, such as corn, soybean, rape, sugar cane or oil palm; corn; tobacco; nuts; coffee; tea; bananas; vines (table grapes and grape juice grape vines); hop; turf; sweet leaf (also called Stevia); natural rubber plants or horticultural or ornamental and forestry plants, such as flowers, shrubs, broadleaved trees or evergreens, e. g. conifers; including the plant propagation material, such as seeds.
The term “plant propagation material” is to be understood to denote all the generative parts of the plant such as seeds and vegetative plant material such as cuttings and tubers (e. g. potatoes), which can be used for the multiplication of the plant. This includes seeds, roots, fruits, tubers, bulbs, rhizomes, shoots, sprouts and other parts of plants, including seedlings and young plants, which are to be transplanted after germination or after emergence from soil.
The term “cultivated plants” is to be understood as including plants which have been modified by breeding, mutagenesis or genetic engineering including but not limiting to agricultural biotech products on the market or in development (cf. http://cera-gmc.org/, see GM crop database therein). Genetically modified plants are plants, which genetic material has been so modified by the use of recombinant DNA techniques that under natural circumstances cannot readily be obtained by cross breeding, mutations or natural recombination. Typically, one or more genes have been integrated into the genetic material of a genetically modified plant in order to improve certain properties of the plant. Such genetic modifications also include but are not limited to targeted post-translational modification of protein(s), oligo- or polypeptides e. g. by glycosylation or polymer additions such as prenylated, acetylated or farnesylated moieties or PEG moieties.
The present disclosure includes a description and illustration of a number of exemplary embodiments. The following embodiments are preferred embodiments for the apparatus according to the present invention used for carrying out the process of providing a functional coating to a particulate material, preferably a landscape material like for instance mulch and similar wood materials.
A preferred apparatus to be used in the inventive process for coating a particulate material, preferably with a functional coating, comprises:
a mixer having a mixing chamber;
means for feeding the particulate material into the mixing chamber;
an agitator provided in the mixing chamber, the agitator mixing and conveying the particulate material from an inlet to a discharge outlet;
a coating feed system for delivery of a coating into the mixing chamber during mixing by the agitator, the coating delivered as an atomized spray directed at the mixing particulate material within the mixing chamber; and
a controller for adjusting the flow of the coating into the mixing chamber based on the volumetric flow rate of the particulate material.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the feeding means is a slat conveyor.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the agitator is formed by a rotating shaft having a plurality of paddle blades positioned on arms projecting from the shaft.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the coating comprises a mixture of a coating material and a pressurized carrier.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the pressurized carrier is water.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the pressurized carrier is provided at about 689 kPa.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the apparatus further comprises sensors providing signals proportional to the volume of particulate material fed from the feeding means to the mixing chamber.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the sensor signals are combined with signals from the feeding means to determine the volumetric flow rate of the particulate material.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the controller receives sensor signals and the feeding means signals and directs a control signal to the coating feed system to adjust the flow of the coating into the mixing chamber.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the coating feed system comprises a plurality of spray nozzles.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the spray nozzles direct the spray within an initial portion of the length of the mixing chamber.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, adjustment of the flow rate of the spray from the plurality of nozzles by the controller is performed by regulating the number of operational spray nozzles.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, each of the spray nozzles comprises a separate inlet for a coating material and for a carrier material and wherein a coating mixture of the coating material and carrier is formed by the spray nozzle at an outlet orifice.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the carrier material of the coating mixture is pressurized at the carrier material inlet to the spray nozzle and wherein the pressurized carrier creates the atomized spray at the outlet orifice.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the adjustment of the flow rate of the coating spray is based on a preset ratio of kilograms per minute (kg/min) of a coating material and liters per minute (l/min) of a carrier material to the feed rate in cubic meters per minute (m3/min) of the particulate material.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, the mixing chamber is defined in part by an elongated trough.
In a further preferred embodiment of the apparatus, at least one weir plate is provided within the trough for increasing residence time of the particulate within the mixing chamber.
It should be understood by those skilled in the art from the foregoing that various other changes, omissions and additions may be made therein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, with the invention being identified by the foregoing.
A preferred embodiment of the apparatus for performing the process according to the present invention for preparing functionally treated particulate material having a coating of functional material has been described above.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples which are however not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
In all screening tests, the functional treatment of particulate material was conducted using a Sahara PRO apparatus comprising
a mixer having a mixing chamber;
means for feeding the particulate material into the mixing chamber; The feed means for the particulate material comprises a hopper having a floor forming a conveyor for moving the particulate material to the mixing chamber via the mixing chamber inlet.
an agitator provided in the mixing chamber, the agitator mixing and conveying the particulate material from an inlet to a discharge outlet;
a coating feed system for delivery of a coating into the mixing chamber during mixing by the agitator, the coating delivered as an atomized spray directed at the mixing particulate material within the mixing chamber; and The coating feed system comprises a pump., any desired form of pump may be used, e.g. peristaltic.
a controller for adjusting the flow of the coating into the mixing chamber based on the volumetric flow rate of the particulate material. Controlling the volumetric flow rate of the coating spray is based on a present ratio of kilograms per minute (kg/min) of a coating material and liters per minute (l/min) of a carrier material to the flow rate in cubic meters per minute (m3/min) of the particulate material.
During this functional treatment, the particulate material as used in all screening tests was coated using a Sahara PRO apparatus comprising the steps of:
feeding the particulate material into the mixing chamber;
agitating the particulate material within the mixing chamber and conveying the mixing particulate material to a mixing chamber outlet;
directing an atomized coating spray into the mixing chamber, the spray directed at the agitating and conveying particulate material at a plurality of defined locations within the mixing chamber; and atomization is achieved by pressurizing the carrier component, preferably water and delivering the pressurized carrier component to the coating component to create the atomized coating spray at a pressure in the range of 552 kPa to 1034 kPa.
controlling the flow rate of coating spray based on the volumetric flow rate of the particulate material into the mixing chamber characterized in that the coating spray comprises at least one compound selected from herbicides, insecticides, nutrients, wetting agents, surfactants, fungicides, biologicals, inoculants, and mixtures thereof.
Screening test 1: Evaluation of colored and non-colored mulch functionalized with additional herbicide for weed control.
The following functionalized treatments were prepared—Hardwood, 2″ (5.08 cm) mulch depth (1× rate):
Using the process for providing a functionalized coating to a particulate material according to the present invention, a combination of the herbicide liquids was applied to mulch with and without colorant (named inventive examples IE1 and IE2). The amounts were as follows:
Evaluation of the functionalized particulate materials according to the present invention (inventive examples IE1 and IE2) was carried out relative to the comparative examples CE1 to CE5 based on a screen for weed efficacy of the corresponding materials.
In the initial screening experiment, the effect of the functional treatment of the particulate materials according to inventive examples IE1 and IE2 relative to the comparative materials according to comparative examples CE1 to CE5 were tested for the following three different weeds:
Velvetleaf—small seeded broad leaf weed (ABUTH, Abutilon theophrasti)
Ryegrass—grass (LOLPE, Lolium perenne)
Crabgrass—grass (DIGSA, Digitaria sanguinalis)
The results of this screening experiment are depicted in the below Table 1.
Table 1 shows the results of a screening experiment related to weed control using a functional herbicide coating on particulate material.
The following conclusions can be drawn from this screening experiment:
For all the screening tests with herbicide compositions or mixtures, the examplary, non-limiting application recipe is as follows:
For all the screening tests with herbicide compositions or mixtures, the application rates for Sahara are as follows:
One drum of herbicide additive should produce 1,233 cubic yards (943 cubic meters) of wood mulch.
Mixing machines volumetrically monitor wood mulch input to calculate application rates.
Screening test 2: Evaluation of weed control using functionalized particulate material in view of various types of weed.
The percentages of the weed control were determined via visual assessment.
The following samples were prepared—Hardwood, 2″ (5.08 cm) mulch depth (1× rate):
Treatments: Combined active rate: 0.004 wt %; Hardwood mulch 2″ (5.08 cm) depth.
The following conclusions could be drawn from this screening experiment:
Screening test 3: Evaluation of tolerance of plants against functionally treated particulate material.
This test was carried out using a larger number of different ornamentals. Tolerance was studied at 1.5× rate=3 inches of functionally treated particulate material (mulch). The following ornamentals were included in this test experiment:
Results:
Screening test 4: Recovery of functional material from particulate material. In this experimental study the herbicide active ingredient was analyzed as the content of functional material (herbicide) as the active ingredient in the particulate material (mulch).
Assay protocol: Ten milliliters of 100% methanol was used to extract the herbicide actives, Pendimethalin and Dimethenamid-P from one gram of mulch. Methanol and mulch were added to a vial and shaken at approximately 180 rpm for 30 minutes on a shaker table. Methanol was filtered from mulch and analyzed for actives via HPLC. Active ingredient recovery was recorded as weight percent. Mulch samples were taken from top and bottom of weathered mulch beds at 3.5 months.
The results of this screening experiment are depicted in below Table 2 and Table 3. Table 2 and Table 3 show the results of an experiment related to the recovery of herbicide active ingredient from particulate material after providing functional herbicide coating. Table 2 and Table 3 show active ingredient releasing from the mulch at one month exposure compaed to non-exposed mulch in warehouse.
The following conclusions could be drawn from this screening experiment based on the results summarized in Table 2 and Table 3:
Screening test 5: Evaluation of efficacy of colored and non-colored mulch (wood fiber) functionalized with insecticide:
An exemplary, non-limiting procedure of insecticide treatment of mulch is provided below:
Mixing vessel was a 35 gallon drum containing 375 pounds of Impact Coffee Brown colorant. The colorant was mixed for 20 minutes with a drum mixer to insure uniformity of colorant. After mixing color, 1.07 pounds of Alpine WSG was added. This mixture was stirred for 20 minutes using a drum mixer. The drum containing colorant and insecticide was immediately hooked-up to Sahara PRO for application to particulate material.
Methods:
Testing with red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta, RIFA), Argentine ant (Linepthema humile), and odorous house ant (OHA) workers. Ten inch plastic arenas (inside walls coated with Fluon® to prevent escape) were provided a layer of moistened play sand. A band of mulch was placed across the arena near one side. Between the closest side and the mulch, a micro-centrifuge tube with a universal ant diet was placed. In the larger open area of the arena was placed a water vial and a small weigh boat with either corn grit+soybean oil (RIFA) or 20% honey water (Argentine ant and OHA). Approximately 100 ants were placed in each arena. Mortality was evaluated at 6 or 7 days.
Conclusions:
Conclusions:
The present disclosure includes a description and illustration of a number of exemplary embodiments. It should be understood by those skilled in the art from the foregoing that various other changes, omissions and additions may be made therein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, with the invention being identified by the foregoing claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13168449 | May 2013 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/785,283, filed Oct. 16, 2015, which is the National Stage entry of PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/035272, filed Apr. 24, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/816,353, filed Apr. 26, 2013, and is also a continuation-in-part of PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/030998, filed May 15, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/993,330, filed May 15, 2014, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3735532 | Long, III | May 1973 | A |
| 5714263 | Jakubisin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5866201 | Blue | Feb 1999 | A |
| 9950331 | Phillips | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 20030201154 | Hallstrom | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040228207 | McNeff et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20110152100 | Parrish | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2012109432 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| WO2014194260 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| BASF Safety Data Sheet for Freehand herbicide, Nov. 2013. |
| CAS Registry File for 163515-14-8, Jun. 1995. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/035272, dated Sep. 23, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160083651 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61993330 | May 2014 | US | |
| 61816353 | Apr 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14785283 | US | |
| Child | 14954706 | US | |
| Parent | 14954706 | US | |
| Child | 14954706 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US2015/030998 | May 2015 | US |
| Child | 14954706 | US |
