1. Field of the Invention
2. Description of the Related Art
The invention relates to a method of laying a pipeline on a seabed and to a member for assisting in the laying of pipelines on a seabed.
A traditional approach to laying pipelines at sea is a technique known as “S-laying”. This technique involves laying pipeline from a vessel with the pipeline inclined by a small inclination such as 5 or 10 degrees to the horizontal as it leaves the vessel.
A more recent approach involves a technique known as “J-laying”, in which the pipeline leaves the vessel at a much steeper angle which may even be vertical. This method is especially suitable for laying a pipeline in deep water.
A problem associated with J-laying is the means by which additional pipe sections are added to the pipeline. Because of the steep angle of the pipeline at the vessel, the length of pipeline above sea level that can be worked on at any one time is much more restricted than in S-laying and therefore the scope for having several working stations along the length of the pipeline for working on connections of pipe sections, as is commonplace in S-laying, is much reduced.
Further problems are encountered when the pipeline in question uses what is commonly referred to as a “pipe-in-pipe” design. This design uses an inner pipe and an outer pipe. The inner pipe is used to carry fluid along the pipeline; insulation is provided around the inner pipe and the outer pipe surrounds the inner pipe and is provided to contain and protect the insulation. This configuration is commonly used to carry hot well fluids along a pipeline.
The lengths of pipeline are usually connected by butt welding. Sometimes a backing ring is placed inside the pipe at the butt joint to improve the welded joint that is obtained. The use of a pipe-in-pipe design complicates this welding process because the inner pipe must be welded before the outer pipe can be welded, so that two separate welding operations are required at one joint. Thus the time taken to complete a welded joint becomes more critical.
A particular problem arises with welding of the ends of the outer pipe in a pipe-in-pipe design because those ends do not generally need to be prepared to such close tolerances as the inner pipe and it is therefore possible for there to be a significant mismatch of the ends of the outer pipe to be welded. Such a mismatch is liable to cause a conventional butt welding process to provide an inadequate joint and/or take too long to provide a sufficiently good joint.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for laying a pipeline of a pipe-in-pipe design that reduces some of the problems described above in relation to welding of the outer pipes.
According to the invention there is provided a method of laying a pipeline on a seabed, in which the pipeline comprises inner pipe lengths connected together and outer pipe lengths connected together around the inner pipe lengths and in which outer lengths of pipe are joined to the pipeline as it is laid by a welding process involving the following steps for welding the end of a length of a first outer pipe to the end of a length of a second outer pipe:
fitting an annular member in the end of the first outer pipe with a first axial part of the member within the first outer pipe and a second flange part of the member projecting radially outwardly beyond the inside of the first outer pipe and terminating radially inwardly of the outside of the first outer pipe;
bringing the end of the second outer pipe into a position substantially axially aligned with and confronting the end of the first outer pipe, with the second flange part of the annular member interposed between the confronting ends of the first and second outer pipes, the second flange part projecting radially outwardly beyond the inside of the second outer pipe and terminating radially inwardly of the outside of the second outer pipe; and
welding the confronting ends of the first and second outer pipes together, the second flange part of the annular member providing some of the welding material.
The use of an annular member with a flange part interposed between the confronting ends of the first and second outer pipes enables a much better weld to be obtained easily, both when the ends of the outer pipes are dimensioned and arranged very precisely and when they are dimensioned and arranged to relatively wide tolerances. When such tolerances are allowed, nominally circular pipes may be significantly non-circular and the end of a pipe may not lie fully in a single plane perpendicular to the axis of the pipe; in such cases there will inevitably be gaps between, or non-alignment of, certain confronting portions of the ends of the first and second outer pipes. The flanged annular member is, however, able to reduce the deleterious effect of such tolerances on the welding operation.
Usually the welding process will be carried out as a new length of outer pipe is joined to the end of the pipeline. In that case the first outer pipe is at the end of the pipeline and the second outer pipe extends the pipeline once it has been welded to the first outer pipe. It will be appreciated that each of the first and second outer pipes may itself be formed of a number of separate pipe sections joined end-to-end in separate operations that may be carried out on shore; in a typical case four individual pipe sections may be welded to one another to form a first or second outer pipe, which may have a length of the order of 50 m.
In an especially advantageous embodiment of the invention, the annular member includes a third axial part which is inserted within the end of the second outer pipe when the end of the second outer pipe is brought into the position confronting the end of the first outer pipe. Such an arrangement can assist in ensuring good alignment of the ends of the first and second outer pipes. Preferably, the third axial part reduces in external diameter with increasing axial spacing from the second flange part, whereby the end of the second outer pipe is guided into a position substantially axially aligned with the end of the first outer pipe as it is brought into the position confronting the end of the first outer pipe; preferably the third axial part of the annular member comprises a base portion of substantially constant diameter and a distal end portion of progressively reducing diameter; a reduction in diameter of this kind facilitates the introduction of the third axial part into the end of the second outer pipe and the subsequent aligning of the ends of the outer pipes. It will be understood that usually the first axial part is a loose fit in the first outer pipe and, similarly, that usually the third axial part is a loose fit in the second outer pipe.
It is preferred that the first and second axial parts each define continuous ring portions of the annular member and extend around the whole of the member; an alternative possibility, however, for the first and second axial parts and especially for the distal ends of those parts is for them to be discontinuous in a circumferential direction. Similarly the second flange part may be discontinuous and/or of variable radial extent (depth) and/or thickness around the annular member but preferably is continuous, preferably is of substantially constant radial extent and preferably is of substantially constant thickness around the annular member.
Preferably the first axial part of the annular member includes a portion of reduced external diameter adjacent to the flange part, whereby, when the annular member is fitted in the end of the first outer pipe, an annular cavity is formed between the annular member and the inside of the end of the first outer pipe, the cavity being defined by the inside of the first outer pipe, the outside of the reduced external diameter portion of the first axial part and the flange part. The provision of the annular cavity assists in providing a reasonably consistent spacing of the annular member from the first outer pipe around the circumference of the annular member and immediately below the flange part, despite any tolerance variations in the dimensions of the first outer pipe.
Generally, it is preferred that the second flange part projects only a relatively small part of the way from the insides of the first and second outer pipes to the outsides. More particularly, it is preferred that the second flange part terminates at a location radially closer to the insides than to the outsides of the first and second outer pipes.
Preferably, the ends of the lengths of the first and second outer pipes are at an angle steeper than 45 degrees to the horizontal when the ends are welded together. With such steep inclination the number of welding stations at which work can be carried out simultaneously on pipe connections is limited by height consideration and the invention is therefore of particular relevance. Thus the invention preferably comprises J-laying of a pipeline.
The present invention further provides a pipeline laid on a seabed by a method as defined above. The pipeline may include any of the constructional features that are implicit or explicit from the description above.
The present invention still further provides an annular member for fitting in the end of a first outer pipe of a pipe-in-pipe pipeline during the process of welding the first outer pipe to a second outer pipe in a method of laying a pipeline on a seabed, the annular member including a first axial part for fitting within an end of the first outer pipe, a second flange part projecting radially outwardly beyond the first axial part, and a third axial part for insertion within an end of the second outer pipe when the end of the second outer pipe is brought into a position confronting the end of the first outer pipe, the second flange part also projecting radially outwardly beyond the second axial part.
The second flange part may project outwardly beyond the first and second axial parts by a distance in the range of from 1 to 7 mm, more preferably by an amount in the range of 2 to 5 mm. Such a distance is likely to be small compared to the thickness of a pipe.
The second flange part preferably has a thickness in the range of 0.5 to 2 mm and more preferably of the order of 1 mm. Thus the second flange part is preferably relatively thin.
The overall diameter of the annular member is of course determined by the diameters of the first and second outer pipes to be joined but will typically lie in the range of about 100 mm to about 1000 mm. Thus in the preferred form of the annular member, the thickness of the flange part is less than one hundredth of the overall diameter of the annular member.
The annular member may include any of the constructional features that are implicit or explicit from the description above of the way in which the annular member is to be used in a method of laying a pipeline on a seabed. Similarly, the annular member employed in the method may be of any of the forms just described and may have dimensions lying in the ranges indicated.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The general technique of J-laying is itself well known and will not be described further here. The distinctive aspect of the present invention concerns the use of an annular member or ring 5, shown in
The ring 5 shown in
The flange part 12 comprises a continuous circular flange of constant diameter around the ring and also of constant thickness (depth).
The third axial part 13 is of generally circular cylindrical shape and has a lower portion 13A of constant external diameter and an upper portion 13B of progressively reducing external diameter.
As can be seen from
In one particular example of the invention the ring 5 has the following dimensions:
It will be apparent from the dimensions given above that in practice the ring 5 is much wider and shallower than is shown in FIG. 2.
The outer pipe 16B is then lowered to the position shown in
Once the parts are in the position shown in
We have found that the provision of the ring 5 results in a more reliable weld joint being obtained more easily. That is especially true when, unlike the situation illustrated in
In
In
In the examples described above, the presence of the ring 5 assists in reducing misalignment of the pipes and also in retaining the weld pool at the welding location during the welding process, even when there are significant variations in pipe diameters or pipe end faces.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0107637 | Mar 2001 | GB | national |
This application is a national stage of PCT/EP02/04195 filed on Mar. 26, 2002 and based upon United Kingdom 0107637.1 filed Mar. 27, 2001.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP02/04195 | 3/26/2002 | WO | 00 | 1/13/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/07750 | 10/3/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1220189 | Chapman | Mar 1917 | A |
1630037 | Stresau | May 1927 | A |
1987341 | Kachel | Jan 1935 | A |
2215460 | Childress | Sep 1940 | A |
2409865 | Jewell | Oct 1946 | A |
2696835 | Kaiser | Dec 1954 | A |
2792490 | Risch et al. | May 1957 | A |
3266256 | Postlewaite et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3389563 | Postlewaite et al. | Jun 1968 | A |
3440826 | Kline | Apr 1969 | A |
3524326 | Craste | Aug 1970 | A |
3555835 | Smith | Jan 1971 | A |
3581506 | Howard | Jun 1971 | A |
3585806 | Lawrence | Jun 1971 | A |
3680322 | Nolan, Jr. et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3777115 | Kazlauskas et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3800116 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3802209 | Weaver | Apr 1974 | A |
3860122 | Cernosek | Jan 1975 | A |
3974356 | Nelson et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4067534 | Frey | Jan 1978 | A |
4068490 | Jegousse | Jan 1978 | A |
4112698 | Lammert et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4145593 | Merrick et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4151395 | Kushner et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4234268 | Scodino | Nov 1980 | A |
4283617 | Merrick et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4345855 | Uyeda et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4350868 | Takagi et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4373125 | Kazlauskas | Feb 1983 | A |
4380695 | Nelson | Apr 1983 | A |
4408112 | Kazlauskas | Oct 1983 | A |
4417126 | Kasahara et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4441011 | Nomura et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4444528 | Scodino et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4485291 | Nomura et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4486123 | Koch et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4495400 | Thompson | Jan 1985 | A |
4525616 | Slavens | Jun 1985 | A |
4591294 | Foulkes | May 1986 | A |
4631386 | Slavens | Dec 1986 | A |
4721410 | Recalde | Jan 1988 | A |
4765776 | Howson | Aug 1988 | A |
4822230 | Slettedal | Apr 1989 | A |
4834604 | Brittain et al. | May 1989 | A |
4854400 | Simpson | Aug 1989 | A |
4865359 | Roberts | Sep 1989 | A |
4990743 | Kugai et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5030812 | Sugitani et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5126523 | Rinaldi | Jun 1992 | A |
5146064 | Poirier | Sep 1992 | A |
5248080 | Stapleton | Sep 1993 | A |
5347101 | Brennan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5368223 | Chevrel et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5421675 | Brown et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5464307 | Wilkins | Nov 1995 | A |
6124566 | Belloni et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6142359 | Corbishley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6273643 | Baugh | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6352388 | Seguin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361250 | de Varax | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6429405 | Belloni et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6524030 | Giovannini et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 118 360 | Oct 1971 | DE |
1 625 957 | Apr 1972 | DE |
36 15 947 | Oct 1987 | DE |
0 021 856 | Jan 1981 | EP |
0 076 018 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0 153 979 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0 262 545 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0 271 184 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0 402 648 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0 439 975 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0 657 670 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 661 488 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 706 849 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0 852 984 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1107541 | Mar 1968 | GB |
1178219 | Jan 1970 | GB |
2 095 787 | Oct 1982 | GB |
2 204 106 | Nov 1988 | GB |
2 258 030 | Jan 1993 | GB |
2 322 423 | Aug 1998 | GB |
2 339 251 | Jan 2000 | GB |
59-191575 | Oct 1984 | JP |
62-118976 | May 1987 | JP |
330 519 | Oct 1998 | NL |
9109700 | Jul 1991 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040131425 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |