The present invention relates to the folding of sheet materials and, more particularly, to the continuous folding of different types of sheet materials into a multiplicity of predetermined, three-dimensional structural patterns having a desired number of folds and fold heights.
Folded materials are useful in packaging technology, sandwich structures, floor boards, car bumpers and other applications where requirements pertaining to shock, vibration, energy absorption, and/or a high strength-to-weight ratio including volume reduction must be met.
Continuous folding machines should have versatility, flexibility, and high production rates. Additionally, a machine that can additionally accomplish folding in an inexpensive manner is most rare.
In accordance with the present invention, various inventive embodiments for a machine and method for the continuous folding of sheet material into different three-dimensional patterns is disclosed.
One objective of the present inventive machine is to provide the folding of a wide range of materials over a range of desired fold configurations, and to fold such material over a wide range of sizes.
Another objective of the invention is to provide a machine with the ability to fold different types of sheet materials, as opposed to mere metal or paper, thereby providing a cost saving, because users need invest in only one machine.
Another objective is to provide a machine that can generate patterns with extensive geometric variations within the same family of patterns. The generated patterns can then be used in many applications such as cores for sandwiched structures, pallets, bridge decks, floor decks, and packaging applications.
The invention accomplishes all of the above objectives by having both a unique structure and unique programming. The programming allows for the change of the folding sequence, so that different patterns can be produced. The programming also allows for a selective change of materials.
The present inventive machine can also be programmed to provide microfolding stations each of which increases the number of folds while reducing the fold height, whereby if the number of folds are doubled, the fold height is reduced by one-half, for example.
In a general overview, the inventive machine causes the material to funnel towards an end section, which imparts the final folds or pattern. The funnel process can be thought of as a method of force convergence, or continuous-positioning of the material towards the final stage of the machine. The material is then finally folded in the desired pattern at the final stage.
The innovative machine folds sheet material, including paper, biodegradable material, composites and plastics, enables a flat sheet of material to be fed through a series of rollers or dies (the number of which is a function of final product width) that pre-fold the material until it reaches the last set of rollers or dies. The final fold pattern is implemented by having the pattern geometry negatively engraved on these rollers. The direction of the engraved folding pattern on the last set of rollers can be made longitudinal or perpendicular to the roller axis (or at any desirable angle in between), resulting in a longitudinal, angular or cross-folded sheet. Further, the last set of rollers can be made from different materials (metals, PVC, . . . ) or combinations of two different materials such as rubber on metal (one roller from rubber and the other from metal to create sharp increases in the folded pattern).
The material is fed between the first set of rollers or dies, which makes a central single fold in the middle of the material. The material then advances to a second set of rollers or dies, that makes two extra outer folds, one on each side of the first fold. The material then advances to a third set of rollers or dies, making two additional outer folds. This process continues at the sequenced sets of rollers or dies until the desired number of folds in the rolling direction is reached. In one embodiment of the invention a microfold multiplier having a plain (or circular) die configuration is inserted between a last roller or die for providing longitudinal folding and a final cross folding roller, for microfolding the sheet material before it enters the final roller.
At the last set of rollers or dies, the material is rolled between two rollers or dies having the fold patterns engraved/machined on their surfaces to produce the final pattern of the folded sheet. No additional folds are made at the last set of rollers or dies. The design, manufacture, and integration of the last set of rollers or dies is flexible enough that other patterns can easily be produced in a short period of time and with minimum machine setting of both pre- and final folding stages. The above procedures are applicable to any other method for folding based on the principle of series 1, 3, 5, 7 . . . , until the desired width of material is achieved. At this stage the material is then fed through the fold multiplier die to reduce the height of the pattern by 50% and double the number of folds in the same material width. This includes flat dies or frames (or roller dies) with grooves that follow this sequence.
The folded sheet, upon leaving the inventive machine, can be compressed further to any desired compaction ratio and/or laminated between overlying and underlying sheets of material to produce structures and packaging material with specific characteristics. The design flexibility of the machine allows folding patterns of different materials and different thicknesses and/or with different mechanical properties.
Specifically, the invention performs folding in the mathematical series 1, 3, 5, 7, . . . , where the numerals are related to the number of tessellations on the surface of each set of rollers or dies at each stage of the initial folding process. This specific sequencing, creating two new longitudinal tessellations on each successive set of rollers according to the mathematical series 1, 3, 5, 7, . . . totally eliminates the typical material slitting (or shredding) phenomenon, which occurs if all tessellation is performed in one set of rollers or dies, causing material to be cogged in, and stretch to conform to, roll or die profile. This innovative technique eliminates this slitting (or shredding) phenomena by subjecting the sheet material to only two predetermined transverse friction forces: one on each edge of the sheet. Material on the edges has access to flow in from the sides to form the next two extra tessellations without undue restriction.
The innovative sequential tessellation technique enables sheet materials to be effectively folded with minimum power requirements, and without sheet slitting and/or stretching. The innovative use of one or more microfolding fold multiplier plain dies before a final cross folding roller reduces the length of the machine compared to not using fold multiplier roller stations.
This technology introduces new and highly economical methods of producing lightweight cores, structures, and packages that outperform most of the existing comparative structures and their methods of production. The material that is formed has many applications ranging from the design of diesel filters, to aviator crash helmets, to high-speed lighters, to airdrop cushioning systems, to biodegradable packaging materials and to lightweight floor decks, among others. The technology can produce structures of versatile shapes, single and multiple layers, and different patterns created from different materials, geometries and dimensions.
The inventive machine has produced packages that have outperformed honeycomb packages, the current industry and government standard. The produced cushioning packaging pads are capable of absorbing significantly higher energy per unit volume when compared with honeycomb packaging structures.
All types of 3-D geometrical patterns can be formed from a flat sheet of material without stretching, and then selecting such a pattern to be folded. Specifically, to preserve the folding intrinsic geometry, each vertex in a faceted surface must have all the angles meet at the point from adjacent faces to total 360 degrees. This 360-degree total of angles is required for the vertex to unfold and lay flat in the plane, thereby eliminating stretching.
A mathematical theory of the folding geometry of this invention was been developed by Daniel Kling, and can be studied in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,935,997. This theory facilitates the pattern selection process for use with the inventive machine. A pattern can be chosen via this mathematical theory based on different criteria, such as geometry, strength, or density, based on the desired parameters of the final product.
Other existing technologies for forming sheet materials are not at all similar to the inventive technology. For example, known forming machines use dies of flat and rigid tessellations to stretch the sheet material to form identical shapes to those of the pattern to be produced in the final folded shape of this technology. This technology and other types of technologies result in non-uniform change in both sheet thickness and material properties, due to the nature of the forming operation. This is opposed to the current invention's folding operation that does not stretch or adversely change any of the existing material physical or mechanical properties since it creates the folded pattern by only bending the sheet material along the edges of the tessellations in the form of plastic hinges.
An advantage of the present invention is its ability to fold sheet material into a continuous intricate faceted structure.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it is a versatile, flexible, and inexpensive machine that performs various folding operations.
Another advantage of the present invention is its ability to fold sheet material while preserving its intrinsic geometry without stretching it.
Another advantage of the present invention is its ability to fold sheet material with minimum energy and load requirement, due to the nature of the folding mechanism being of very localized deformed zones of plastic hinges formed on tessellation edges.
Another objective and advantage of the present inventive sheet material folding machine is the use of one or more plain (or roller) die configured fold multipliers to minimize the length and cost of the folding machine.
The present invention is described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like items are identified by the same reference designation, in which:
Generally speaking, a machine for continuous folding of sheet materials is featured. The machine comprises a plurality of rollers or dies, each with a different amount of raised portions (related to the number of tessellations) for creating folds in the material traveling through the machine.
Now referring to
The sheet material 15 is fed through the first proximal set of rollers or dies 16. Each roller or die 13, 14 of the first proximal set of rollers or dies 16 has one tessellation 18. This tessellation 18 makes a single fold 20 in the sheet material 15.
Each roller or die 19, 21 of the second set of rollers or dies 22 has three tessellations for making an additional two folds in the sheet material 15. The single fold 20 produced by the first proximal set of rollers or dies 16 proceeds through the center tessellation of the second set of rollers or dies 22 where it maintains its shape. Two new folds 24, 26 are created by the outside tessellations of the second set of rollers or dies 22.
Each roller or die 23, 25 of the third set of rollers or dies 28 has five tessellations, two more tessellations 18 than each roller or die 19, 21 in the previous second set of rollers or dies 22. This pattern of two additional tessellations 18 per roller or die continues from the first set of rollers or dies 16 to the penultimate set of rollers or dies, shown in this embodiment at numeral 30. In this example, a plain die 50 configured for multiplying the number of folds from the set of rollers 30 by a factor of two, and reducing the height of the folds by one-half in this example, is installed between the two sets of rollers 30 and 32. As will be described in greater detail below, the plain die includes an upper plate 52, and a lower plate 54. Each roller or die 36, 38 of the final set of rollers or dies 32 has the same number of tessellations 18 as the number of folds in the sheet material exiting from the plain die 50, in this example. The final fold pattern 34 is implemented by having the pattern geometry negatively engraved on the last set of rollers or dies 32. Further, the last set of rollers or dies 32 can be made of rubber to create sharp creases in the sheet material 15.
Six sets of rollers and one plain die are depicted in
The final material 34 is in the desired form once it leaves the last set of rollers or dies 32. To fold a different pattern on the sheet material 15, the tessellations 18 on all of the rollers or dies can be easily changed.
The design of the machine for continuous folding 10 allows any length of material to be folded. The sheet material 15 starts out at its widest width at the first set of rollers or dies 16 and becomes narrower at each successive set of rollers or dies, as the number of tessellations 18 increases (
The present inventors recognized that prior art folding machines utilizing a large number of folding rollers are excessively long, and many times are impractical for use, in applications where a large number of folds are required in the sheet material. In many such instances, the length of the machine required for providing a large number of folds is excessive. Accordingly, the present inventors conceived a fold multiplier 50 provided by a plain die configuration 52, 54, as shown in the example in
An example of a configuration for the die 50 shown in
The configuration of the triangular projections 56, 62 and grooves 58, 61 in the top die section 52 and bottom die section 54 respectively, actually can be made somewhat more complicated than previously described. Specifically,
The operation of the plain die folding multiplier 50 will now be described with reference to
With further reference to
With reference to the example of the fold multiplier plain die 50 of
The fold multiplier plain die 50 of
Although various embodiments of the present invention are shown and described, they are not meant to be limiting. Accordingly, the present disclosure covers all changes and modifications that would be apparent to one of skill in the art which do not constitute departures from the true spirit and scope of this invention, and appended claims.
This Application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/265,571 filed 2 Nov. 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,691,045, and Ser. No. 11/518,642 filed 11 Sep. 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,758,487, and to U.S. Pat. No. 7,115,089, each having the same assignee herewith. Also, this Application takes priority from PCT/US2007/018799 filed 27 Aug. 2007, and is a Continuation in Part Application from U.S. application Ser. No. 11/518,642, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,758,487. The teachings of both the co-pending Applications and Patents are incorporated by reference herein to the extent they do not conflict herewith.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/018799 | 8/27/2007 | WO | 00 | 3/6/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/033211 | 3/20/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1485917 | Harter | Mar 1924 | A |
1766743 | Freeze | Jun 1930 | A |
RE18760 | Yoder | Mar 1933 | E |
2901951 | Hochfeld | Sep 1959 | A |
2960145 | Ruegenberg | Nov 1960 | A |
3251211 | Harris | May 1966 | A |
3988917 | Mykolenko | Nov 1976 | A |
4012932 | Gewiss | Mar 1977 | A |
4411146 | Sulasaari et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
5028474 | Czaplicki | Jul 1991 | A |
5107695 | Vandenbroucke | Apr 1992 | A |
5185052 | Chappell et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5664451 | Schultz | Sep 1997 | A |
5947885 | Paterson | Sep 1999 | A |
5983692 | Bruck | Nov 1999 | A |
6209375 | Kurose | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6289707 | Saarenko | Sep 2001 | B1 |
7115089 | Basily et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7691045 | Basily et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7758487 | Elsayed et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7963899 | Papsdorf et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8475350 | Basily et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 318 497 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0 261 140 | Jul 1992 | EP |
191419056 | Jan 1915 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090325772 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11518642 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12310784 | US |