1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to phase control in a variable valve mechanism of an internal combustion engine.
2. Description of the Related Art
A variable valve mechanism in which a cam shaft that operates an intake valve and an exhaust valve provided for each cylinder, is of a double shaft structure with an outer cam shaft on the outer side and an inner cam shaft on the inner side arranged within this outer cam shaft, and a main cam is attached to the outer cam shaft while a sub cam is attached to the inner cam shaft, is known from the disclosure of Japanese Laid-open (Kokai) Patent Publication Application No. 2002-054410 (Patent Document 1) and Japanese Laid-open (Kokai) Patent Publication Application No. 2009-144521 (Patent Document 2). This type of variable valve mechanism is provided on either one or both of an intake valve and an exhaust valve, and the phase of a cam is appropriately changed to thereby variably control the operating timing from the valve open timing to the valve closed timing.
Normally, the outer cam shaft in a variable valve mechanism determines the phase of the cam with respect to the crank shaft angle, and the inner cam shaft adjusts the phase of the sub cam with respect to the main cam to determine phase shift between the sub cam and the main cam. By controlling the phase of the main cam and the sub cam in this manner, the valve open timing and the valve close timing are each advanced or retarded, thereby enabling variable control of the length of an open period from the open timing to the close timing (operating angle).
As described above, in a variable valve mechanism that performs phase control of the main cam and the sub cam with a cam shaft of a double shaft structure, in a case in which a locking (seizing) defect occurs in either one of the outer cam shaft and the inner cam shaft, efficient operation of the internal combustion engine may be influenced in some cases. That is to say, for example in a variable valve mechanism provided for an intake valve, if the outer cam shaft of the main cam is locked at an advanced angle position, the overlapping between the exhaust valve and the intake valve (a period in which both of the valves stay open) is maintained great. As a result, there is a possibility that a phenomenon of increasing residual gas at the time of idle operation may occur, leading to an undesirable situation such as unstable combustion.
In view of the above points, it is an object of the present invention to provide an apparatus and a method for controlling a variable valve mechanism in an internal combustion engine, that is capable of executing fail safe control in a case in which locking occurs in either one of the cam shafts.
In order to achieve the above object, the apparatus (method) for controlling a variable valve mechanism in an internal combustion engine according to the present invention is configured as described below.
The variable valve mechanism has a cam shaft of a double shaft structure including an outer side cam shaft and an inner side cam shaft, and a cam is attached to each of these outer and inner cam shafts, such that it is possible to adjust the phase of the cam of one of the cam shafts with respect to the cam of the other cam shaft. By means of a pair of these cams, at least one of a pair of intake valves and a pair of exhaust valves of an internal combustion engine is operated.
The control apparatus (method) includes the following.
a current phase determination section for or step of determining, when an abnormality is detected in one cam shaft of the pair of cam shafts, the current phase of the cam of the abnormal cam shaft; and
a phase control section for or step of controlling the phase of the cam of the other cam shaft, in accordance with the determined current phase of the one cam.
The other objects and features of this invention will become understood from the following description with reference to the accompanying drawing.
The variable valve mechanism of the present embodiment has a cam shaft of a double shaft structure having a cylindrical outer cam shaft 1 on the outer side, and an inner cam shaft 2 on the inner side that is inserted into the interior of outer cam shaft 1.
Outer cam shaft 1 rotates in synchronization with a crank shaft (not shown in the figure) through a timing belt via a sprocket 1S. A main cam MC is attached to this outer cam shaft 1 so as to correspond to each of first to fourth cylinders, to operate a first intake valve (not shown in the figure) for each cylinder.
The rotational phase of this main cam MC is controlled to the advanced angle side or the retarded angle side by a first valve timing setting section 1VT provided on the end section of outer cam shaft 1.
Inner cam shaft 2 is arranged in the interior of outer cam shaft 1 so as to be able to rotate relatively thereto, and rotates together with outer cam shaft 1. A sub cam SC is attached to this inner cam shaft 2 so as to correspond to each of the first to fourth cylinders, to operate a second intake valve (not shown in the figure) for each cylinder.
The rotational phase of sub cam SC is adjusted relatively with respect to main cam MC by a second valve timing setting section 2VT provided on the end section of inner cam shaft 2.
In this manner, in the variable valve mechanism, outer cam shaft 1 determines the phase (base phase) of main cam MC and sub cam SC with respect to the crank shaft angle, and inner cam shaft 2 adjusts the relative phase of sub cam SC with respect to main cam MC to determine the phase shift therebetween.
As disclosed Patent Documents 1 and 2 mentioned above, the detailed structure of the first valve timing setting section 1VT and the second valve timing setting section 2VT that execute this type of phase control, is commonly known technology.
The first valve timing setting section 1VT and the second valve timing setting section 2VT are controlled by a cam controller 3. Cam controller 3, which is configured with a microcomputer and the like, is illustrated in the figure as a separate device to an engine ECU (electronic control unit). However, it may be integrated into the same chip as the engine ECU, or it may be incorporated as a partial function of the engine ECU.
Cam controller 3 receives inputs of output signals from a commonly known cam sensor 4 of a magnetic type or optical type that detects the rotational state of outer cam shaft 1, and from a similar cam sensor 5 that detects the rotational state of inner cam shaft 2.
Moreover, it also receives an input of an output signal from a commonly known crank sensor 6 provided on the crank shaft. Further, operating state related information such as engine revolution speed, load, and engine temperature (cooling water temperature) are received from the engine ECU, and based on these inputs, the first valve timing setting section 1VT and the second valve timing setting section 2VT are controlled.
In outer cam shaft 1, at the position of sub cam SC, there is formed a through hole 1a that is oblong in the circumferential direction, and inner cam shaft 2 and sub cam SC are connected via this through hole 1a. That is to say, sub cam SC is slidably fitted on the circumference of outer cam shaft 1, and is connected to inner cam shaft 2 via a connection pin 2a provided within the through hole 1a.
Therefore, it is possible to adjust the relative phase of sub cam SC with respect to main cam MC in the movable range of the connection pin 2a in the through hole 1a which is oblong in the circumferential direction. As shown in
Regarding the operating timing of the intake valve conforming to main cam MC and sub cam SC controlled in this way by cam controller 3, examples thereof together with the operating timing of the exhaust valve are shown in
What
In the case of
Further, by having the exhaust valve controlled to a retarded angle (30°), EVO is set to delayed open and EVC is set to delayed closure. As a result, there is set a timing where O/L of the intake and exhaust valves is present after the top dead center.
By having the exhaust valve maintained at the reference phase (0°), there is set a timing where O/L of the intake and exhaust valves is present before the top dead center.
a1 shows a case in which when at least one of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 is controlled to an advanced angle position with a pair of variable valve mechanisms on the intake side configured as described above, a locking defect has occurred at an advanced angle side position, to the variable valve mechanism that performs this control (A1, A3, B1, and C3 of
a2 shows a case in which when at least one of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 is controlled to a retarded angle position with a pair of variable valve mechanisms on the exhaust side configured in a manner similar to that of the intake side, a locking defect has occurred at a retarded angle side position, to the variable valve mechanism that performs this control (F4, G2, H2, and H4 of
In these cases, depending on the engine operating state, O/L becomes excessive where the intake valve open timing IVO is excessively advanced with a1 or the exhaust valve close timing EVC is excessively retarded with a2. As a result, combustion at the time of idle operation may become unstable, consequently resulting in engine stall.
Consequently, as a fail-safe measure for this case, the other variable valve mechanism that is not locked is driven in the direction of reducing O/L.
However, in the case of a2, when the first variable valve mechanism (outer cam shaft 1) and the second variable valve mechanism (inner cam shaft 2) are both controlled to a retarded angle position, if outer cam shaft 1 is locked on the retarded angle side, O/L cannot be sufficiently reduced or eliminated even if the fail-safe measure is employed in which inner cam shaft 2 is advanced from the position of being driven to retard together with outer cam shaft 1, and the effect of O/L reduction cannot be obtained. As a result, this fail-safe measure will not be executed (H2 of
b1 shows a case in which when at least one of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 is controlled to an advanced angle position with a pair of variable valve mechanisms on the intake side, a locking defect has occurred at a retarded angle side position, to the variable valve mechanism that performs this control (A2, A4, B2, and C4 of
b2 shows a case in which when at least one of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 is controlled to a retarded angle position with a pair of variable valve mechanisms on the exhaust side, a locking defect has occurred at an advanced angle side position, to the variable valve mechanism that performs this control (F3, G1, H1, and H3 of
In these cases, with b1, the open timing IVO of the intake valve on the locking side is retarded, and with b2, the close timing EVC of the exhaust valve on the locking side is retarded. As a result, in both of these cases, O/L is reduced, and hence fuel economy and exhaust emission are deteriorated.
Consequently, as a fail-safe measure for these cases, the other variable valve mechanism that is not locked is driven in the direction of increasing O/L.
However, in the case of b2, when the first variable valve mechanism (outer cam shaft 1) is controlled to a retarded angle position and the second variable valve mechanism (inner cam shaft 2) is controlled to an advanced angle position, if outer cam shaft 1 is locked at an advanced angle side position, O/L cannot be sufficiently increased even if the fail-safe measure is employed, in which inner cam shaft 2 is advanced from the position of being driven to retard, together with outer cam shaft 1, and the effect of O/L increment cannot be obtained. As a result, this fail-safe measure will not be executed (G1 of
c shows a case in which when a delayed closure control is performed with a pair of variable valve mechanisms on the intake side to retard at least one of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 and retard the close timing IVC of the intake valve after the bottom dead center, a locking defect has occurred at an advanced angle side position, to the variable valve mechanism that performs this control (B3, C1, D1, and D3 of
In this case, it becomes impossible to perform delayed closure control of the intake valve.
Consequently, as a fail-safe measure for this case, the variable valve mechanism of the other cam shaft that is not locked, is driven so that the phase of the other cam is retarded and delayed closure control of the intake valve becomes possible.
However, when the first variable valve mechanism (outer cam shaft 1) is controlled to the retarded angle side and the second variable valve mechanism (inner cam shaft 2) is controlled to the advanced angle side, if outer cam shaft 1 is locked on the advanced angle side, inner cam shaft 2 cannot be sufficiently retarded even if the fail-safe measure is employed in which inner cam shaft 2 is retarded from the position of being driven to advance, together with outer cam shaft 1, and delayed closure control cannot be performed. As a result, this fail-safe measure will not be executed (C1 of
d1 shows a case in which when at least one of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 is controlled to a retarded angle position with a pair of variable valve mechanisms on the intake side, a locking defect has occurred at a retarded angle side position, to the variable valve mechanism that performs this control (B4, C2, D2, and D4 of
In this case, delayed closure is always performed, and output cannot be ensured within the operating range in which output needs to be obtained.
d2 shows a case in which when at least one of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 is controlled to an advanced angle position with a pair of variable valve mechanisms on the exhaust side, a locking defect has occurred at an advanced angle side, to the variable valve mechanism that performs this control (E1, E3, F1, and G3 of
In this case, the open timing EVO of the exhaust valve is always advanced, and as with the case of d1, output cannot be ensured within the operating range where output needs to be obtained.
Consequently, as a fail-safe measure for these cases E1 and E2, the variable valve mechanism of the other cam shaft that is not locked, is driven to advance the close timing IVC of the intake valve with E1 and retard the open timing EVO of the exhaust valve with E2, thereby each ensuring output within the output range.
e shows a case in which when at least one of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 is controlled to an advanced angle position with a pair of variable valve mechanisms on the exhaust side, a locking defect has occurred at a retarded angle side, to the variable valve mechanism that performs this control (E2, E4 F2, and G4 of
In this case, although it is difficult to advance the open timing EVO of the exhaust valve, the influence thereof is small, and hence no fail-safe measure is required.
Regarding the phase control of main cam MC and sub cam SC shown in
For example,
At this time, as shown in the fields indicated with B1 in
Consequently, in this case, there is executed a control such that the phase of sub cam SC (the cam of the other cam shaft) is further retarded, and the intake valve opening area during O/L is reduced while keeping the IVO of the second intake valve from overlapping, to thereby reduce O/L. That is to say, the phase of sub cam SC of inner cam shaft 2 is controlled in the direction of suppressing as much as possible any defect that may occur in the operation of the internal combustion engine due to locking of outer cam shaft 1 (so that the operation approximates the operation at optimum efficiency).
Moreover, as shown in the fields shown with B2 in
Consequently, in this case, there is executed a control for increasing the O/L so that the phase of sub cam SC is advanced and the shortage of the O/L amount is compensated.
Furthermore, as shown in the fields shown with B3 in
Consequently, in this case, a control for delaying IVC is executed so that the phase of main cam MC is retarded and the target IVC is achieved.
As shown in the fields shown with B4 in
Consequently, in this case, a control for advancing IVC is executed so that the phase of main cam MC is advanced and the target IVC is achieved.
Cam controller 3 executes the above-mentioned fail-safe control for currently requested advancing/retarding control shown in
The flow chart of
In step S1, cam controller 3 monitors for an abnormality of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 based on output signals from cam sensors 4 and 5, and crank sensor 6. For example, it monitors whether or not the sensor values from cam sensors 4 and 5 reach the control target within a predetermined period, to determine locking in the variable valve mechanism.
If it is determined as being normal in step S1, the process flow proceeds to step S2 to continue the normal control, and returns and repeats determination of variable valve mechanism locking.
If locking is determined as occurring as a result of step S1, then in step S3, cam controller 3 determines which output signal among those from cam sensors 4 and 5 is abnormal, to thereby determine whether the locking has occurred in outer cam shaft 1 of main cam MC or it has occurred in inner cam shaft 2 of sub cam SC.
If the locking is on the main cam MC side, cam controller 3, in step S4, determines whether main cam MC is locked at an advanced angle position or at a retarded angle position, based on the output signal from cam sensor 4.
If the locking has occurred at an advanced angle position (field shown with A1 in
On the other hand, if the locking has occurred at a retarded angle position (field shown with A2 in
After having set the sub cam target, cam controller 3, in step S7, controls the second valve timing setting section 2VT to drive sub cam SC to the target, and performs monitoring with cam sensor 5. After this, the process flow returns and repeats the process from step S1.
If the locking is on the sub cam SC side in step S3, cam controller 3, in step S8, determines whether sub cam SC is locked at an advanced angle position or at a retarded angle position, based on the output signal from cam sensor 5.
If the locking has occurred at an advanced angle position (field shown with A3 in
On the other hand, if the locking has occurred at a retarded angle position (field shown with A4 in
After having set the main cam target, cam controller 3, in step S11, controls the first valve timing setting section 1VT to drive main cam MC to the target, and performs monitoring with cam sensor 4. After this, the process flow returns and repeats the process from step S1.
The flow chart of
In step S20, as with the description above, cam controller 3 monitors for an abnormality of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 based on output signals from cam sensors 4 and 5, and crank sensor 6, to determine locking of the variable valve mechanism.
If it is determined as being normal in step S20, the process flow proceeds to step S21 to continue the normal control, and returns and repeats determination of variable valve mechanism locking.
If locking is determined as occurring as a result of step S20, then in step S22, cam controller 3 determines whether the locking has occurred in outer cam shaft 1 of main cam MC or it has occurred in inner cam shaft 2 of sub cam SC, based on the output signals from cam sensors 4 and 5 as with the description above.
If the locking is on the main cam MC side, cam controller 3, in step S23, determines whether main cam MC is locked at an advanced angle position or at a retarded angle position, based on the output signal from cam sensor 4.
If the locking has occurred at an advanced angle position (field shown with B1 in
On the other hand, if the locking has occurred at a retarded angle position (field shown with B2 in
After having set the sub cam target, cam controller 3, in step S26, controls the second valve timing setting section 2VT to drive sub cam SC to the target, and performs monitoring with cam sensor 5. After this, the process flow returns and repeats the process from step S20.
If the locking is on the sub cam SC side in step S22, cam controller 3, in step S27, determines whether sub cam SC is locked at an advanced angle position or at a retarded angle position, based on the output signal from cam sensor 5.
If the locking has occurred at an advanced angle position (field shown with B3 in
On the other hand, if the locking has occurred at a retarded angle position (field shown with B4 in
After having set the main cam target, cam controller 3, in step S30, controls the first valve timing setting section 1VT to drive main cam MC to the target, and performs monitoring with cam sensor 4. After this, the process flow returns and repeats the process from step S20.
The flow chart of
In step S40, as with the description above, cam controller 3 monitors for an abnormality of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 based on output signals from cam sensors 4 and 5, and crank sensor 6, to determine locking of the variable valve mechanism.
If it is determined as being normal in step S40, the process flow proceeds to step S41 to continue the normal control, and returns and repeats determination of variable valve mechanism locking.
If locking is determined as occurring as a result of step S40, then in step S42, cam controller 3 determines whether the locking has occurred in outer cam shaft 1 of main cam MC or it has occurred in inner cam shaft 2 of sub cam SC, based on the output signals from cam sensors 4 and 5 as with the description above.
If the locking is on the main cam MC side, cam controller 3, in step S43, determines whether main cam MC is locked at an advanced angle position or at a retarded angle position, based on the output signal from cam sensor 4.
If the locking has occurred at an advanced angle position (field shown with C1 in
On the other hand, if the locking has occurred at a retarded angle position (field shown with C2 in
If the IVC associated with the locked main cam MC is retarded more fhan the target IVC based on the operating state information, the valve opening area can be reduced by the target IVC and the control can be approximated to the appropriate control, by advancing sub cam SC to the target IVC.
After having set the sub cam target, cam controller 3, in step S46, controls the second valve timing setting section 2VT to drive sub cam SC to the target, and performs monitoring with cam sensor 5. After this, the process flow returns and repeats the process from step S40.
If the locking is on the sub cam SC side in step S42, cam controller 3, in step S47, determines whether sub cam SC is locked at an advanced angle position or at a retarded angle position, based on the output signal from cam sensor 5.
If the locking has occurred at an advanced angle position (field shown with C3 in
On the other hand, if the locking has occurred at a retarded angle position (field shown with C4 in
After having set the main cam target, cam controller 3, in step S50, controls the first valve timing setting section 1VT to drive main cam MC to the target, and performs monitoring with cam sensor 4. After this, the process flow returns and repeats the process from step S40.
The flow chart of
In step S60, as with the description above, cam controller 3 monitors for an abnormality of outer cam shaft 1 and inner cam shaft 2 based on output signals from cam sensors 4 and 5, and crank sensor 6, to determine locking of the variable valve mechanism.
If it is determined as being normal in step S60, the process flow proceeds to step S61 to continue the normal control, and returns and repeats determination of variable valve mechanism locking. If locking is determined as occurring as a result of step S60, then in step S62, cam controller 3 determines whether the locking has occurred in outer cam shaft 1 of main cam MC or it has occurred in inner cam shaft 2 of sub cam SC, based on the output signals from cam sensors 4 and 5 as with the description above.
If the locking is on the main cam MC side, cam controller 3, in step S63, determines whether main cam MC is locked at an advanced angle position or at a retarded angle position, based on the output signal from cam sensor 4.
If the locking has occurred at an advanced angle position (field shown with D1 in
On the other hand, if the locking has occurred at a retarded angle position (field shown with D2 in
After having set the sub cam target, cam controller 3, in step S66, controls the second valve timing setting section 2VT to drive sub cam SC to the target, and performs monitoring with cam sensor 5. After this, the process flow returns and repeats the process from step S60.
If the locking is on the sub cam SC side in step S62, cam controller 3, in step S67, determines whether sub cam SC is locked at an advanced angle position or at a retarded angle position, based on the output signal from cam sensor 5.
If the locking has occurred at an advanced angle position (field shown with D3 in
On the other hand, if the locking has occurred at a retarded angle position (field shown with D4 in
After having set the main cam target, cam controller 3, in step S70, controls the first valve timing setting section 1VT to drive main cam MC to the target, and performs monitoring with cam sensor 4. After this, the process flow returns and repeats the process from step S60.
As described above, cam controller 3 is capable of performing fail-safe control of the phase of the other cam that is not locked in the direction of making the O/L period appropriate or in the direction of making IVO or IVC of the intake valve appropriate, in accordance with the current phase of the locked cam.
It can be easily understood that the flow charts of
The entire contents of Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-205373 filed Sep. 20, 2011, and Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-177065 filed Aug. 9, 2012, are incorporated herein by reference.
While only a select embodiment have been chosen to illustrate the present invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure that various changes and modifications can be made herein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Furthermore, the foregoing description of the embodiments according to the present invention is provided for illustration only, and not for the purpose of limiting the invention, the invention as claimed in the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011-205373 | Sep 2011 | JP | national |
2012-177065 | Aug 2012 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6330869 | Yoshiki et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
8677959 | Urushihata | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020166524 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20060106527 | Miyakoshi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060169232 | Dosdall et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070163525 | Fuwa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070251477 | Nozawa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090143963 | Hendriksma | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100077979 | Takada et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145592 | Yoo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110100312 | Hirata | May 2011 | A1 |
20110132327 | Aso et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-54410 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2009-144521 | Jul 2009 | JP |
Entry |
---|
JP 2002-054410 English Translation. |
JP 2009-144521 English Translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130068181 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |