Medical sampling, monitoring and drug delivery systems and processes continue to evolve with a focus on minimization of invasiveness to the patient. By way of example, the following co-owned patents and patent applications are directed to various transdermal sampling and delivery technologies and are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,887,202, 7,931,592, 8,568,315 and U.S. application Ser. No. 14/036,966 directed to Systems and Methods for Monitoring Health and Delivering Drugs Transdermally; U.S. application Ser. No. 13/459,392 directed to Electrochemical Transdermal Glucose Measurement System Including Microheaters and Process For Forming; U.S. application Ser. No. 13/835,696 directed to Microfluidic Systems For Electrochemical Transdermal Glucose Sensing Using a Paper-Based or Other Wicking Substrate; and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/384,199 directed to Microfluidic Systems for Electrochemical Transdermal Analyte Sensing Using a Capillary-Located Electrode (collectively, “Patent Documents”).
While the primary goal of these transdermal systems is to provide minimally invasive devices and processes for collecting and analyzing samples, e.g., blood, interstitial fluid, for analytes and/or for providing medications responsive thereto (e.g., transdermal drug delivery), even a minimally invasive system can leave the access location vulnerable to various microorganisms or microbes, e.g., bacteria, fungi, viruses, which may reside on the user's skin and/or on the devices. Such microorganisms can migrate into the body through the access location, e.g., micropore, causing a potential adverse (negative) response. Some of these microorganisms include drug-resistant bacteria, also called superbugs (e.g., MRSA, C-difficile) which are increasingly resistant to known antibiotics.
Prior research has been conducted in the related area of preventing and/or treating in vivo bacterial infections at open wound sites, such as open fracture sites, using nanocoatings on orthopedic implants. See, Li et al., Multilayer polypeptide nanoscale coatings incorporating IL-12 for the prevention of biomedical device-associated infections, Biomaterials, Volume 30, Issue 13, May 2009, Pages 2552-2558 and Li et al., Evaluation of local MCP-1 and IL-12 nanocoatings for infection prevention in open fractures. J. Orthop. Res. 28:48-54. But far less invasive devices and procedures can also increase user susceptibility to microorganisms.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for an apparatus and process for mitigating possible negative secondary effects resulting from the use of minimally invasive medical sampling, monitoring and drug delivery devices.
Additionally, the risk of infection at surgical and other wound sites dressed with sutures and/or other closure materials remains an issue, particularly with the rise of antibiotic resistant super bugs in the hospital or other medical treatment settings. Accordingly, an on-going need exists for the mitigation of this infection risk.
In addition to the patents and patent applications listed above, the following documents are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and are intended to provide examples of the skill in the art and supporting description for one or more aspects of the embodiments described and illustrated herein: J. W. Gatti et al., Using electrospun poly(ethylene-oxide) nanofibers for improved retention and efficacy of bacteriolytic antibiotics, Biomed Microdevices, October 2013, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 887-893; Bio-Functionalized Nanofibers, Pan-American Advanced Studies Institute (PASI), Aug. 4-12, 2011; J. W. Gatti, Using Electrospun Poly(ethylene-glycol) Nanofibers for Localized Delivery of Antibiotics, Senior Thesis; Ball et al., Drug-Eluting Fibers for HIV-1 Inhibition and Contraception, PLOS One, Vol. 7, Issue 11, November 2012; Vandamme et al., “A comprehensive summary of LL-37, the factotum human cathelicidin peptide,” Cellular Immunology 280, pgs. 22-35 (2012); and Song et al., “Multi-biofunction of antimicrobial peptide-immobilized silk fibroin nanofiber membrane: Implications for wound healing,” Acta Biomater. Volume 39, 15 July 2016, Pages 146-155.
In a first exemplary embodiment, a device for introducing at least one antimicrobial in an exposed region of a user's skin caused while accessing interstitial fluid of a user includes a substrate having thereon a mechanism for accessing the interstitial fluid of the user; and a nanofiber mat loaded with at least one antimicrobial material.
In a second exemplary embodiment, a hand-held device for electrochemically monitoring an analyte in interstitial fluid of a user includes: a first end configured to contact the skin of the user, the first end including a mechanism for ablating the skin of the user to form a micropore to access interstitial fluid and further including a nanofiber mat formed thereon, the nanofiber mat including at least one antimicrobial material; a cartridge connected to the first end and having disposed therein a plurality of disposable sensing elements for contacting interstitial fluid from the micropore to monitor an analyte therein; and a second end connected electrically and mechanically to the cartridge and the first end for facilitating operation of the mechanism for ablating the skin, dispensing of a disposable sensing element and monitoring of the analyte.
In a third exemplary embodiment, a patch having multiple individually controllable sites for accessing interstitial fluid of a user and monitoring at least one analyte therein, includes a substrate having formed thereon the multiple individually controllable sites each including: a mechanism for producing a micropore in the user's skin and accessing the interstitial fluid of the user and a nanofiber mat loaded with at least one antimicrobial material; and an adhesive for adhering the patch to the skin of the user.
The Summary of the Embodiments, as well as the following Detailed Description, is best understood when read in conjunction with the following exemplary drawings:
The applied voltage specifications, i.e., volts/time, may vary in accordance with patient age and size. For example, devices used on adult human patients may be configured to apply 3V (with respect to ground) for, e.g., 30 msec, resulting in a rapid ablation of a portion of the patient's stratum corneum creating an approximately 50 μm diameter micropore therein. Whereas, the same or a different device, may be configured for use with premature human patients where the stratum corneum has minimal thickness. In this case, one skilled in the art recognizes that the applied voltage, time and resulting pore diameter would be reduced.
Further, while the specific representative embodiments described and illustrated herein include the nanofiber mat 18 as being part of the microheating element 10, one skilled in the relevant art understands that variations which provide for the nanofiber mat 18 being in close proximity to the resulting micropore 16, but not necessarily on the microheating element 10, fall well within the scope of the present embodiments. For example, referring to
Additional details regarding the formulation, layout, dimensions and operation of the microheating element 10 are described in the co-owned patents and patent applications (collectively, “Patent Documents”) listed in the Background section above. Multiple microheating elements 10 may be used in an array as discussed in the Patent Documents, wherein multiple individual microheating elements 10 each having a nanofiber mat 18 on or associated therein are included in an array. The array may be included on a substrate, e.g., patch, wherein each of the individual microheating elements 10 is individually controllable/usable, thus resulting in multiple micropores over the course of time and use of the array.
Alternatively, the device may be a single-use device. Whether the microheating element is part of a single-use device or a multi-use device, the effectiveness of the nanofiber mat 18 or more specifically, the antimicrobial, may be enhanced by keeping the device in place for a predetermined amount of time, e.g., at least 2 hours, or an approximate amount of time calculated for the micropore 16 in the stratum corneum to begin closing up.
A description of exemplary processes for formation of the nanofiber mat for use in the embodiment described herein may be found in one or more of the documents listed in the section Documents Incorporated by Reference. The immobilization of antimicrobial peptides and peptide motifs on nanofiber membranes has been achieved and the effectiveness of the antimicrobial nanofiber membranes as both an antibiotic and a wound healing facilitation material has been determined. In a specific exemplary embodiment, the nanofiber mat 18 may be formed using electrospinning techniques to generate nanofibers having varying diameters, e.g., 100-500 nm, from a solution of poly(ethylene-oxide) (PEO) and the antimicrobial peptide, LL-37 as discussed in detail in J. W. Gatti et al., Using electrospun poly(ethylene-oxide) nanofibers for improved retention and efficacy of bacteriolytic antibiotics, Biomed Microdevices, October 2013, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 887-893.
The antimicrobial LL-37 is selected as the exemplar microbial herein for its broad bacteria killing ability. More specifically, LL-37 has been shown to kill the following bacteria as discussed in Vandamme et al., “A comprehensive summary of LL-37, the factotum human cathelicidin peptide,” Cellular Immunology 280, pgs. 22-35 (2012): Bacillus anthracis; Enterococcus faecalis; Group A streptococcus; Group B Streptococcus; Lactobacillus casei; Listeria monocytogenes; Micrococcus luteus; Nocardia sp.; Propionibacterium acnes; Staphylococcus aureus; Streptococcus mutans; Streptococcus pneumonia; Borrelia spp.; Mycobacterium bovis; Mycobacterium smegmatis; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Achromobacter xylosoxidans; Acinetobacter baumannii; Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Brucella suis; Burkholderia pseudomallei; Burkholderia cepacia; Burkholderia thailandensis; Capnocytophaga spp.; Escherichia coli; Francisella novicida; Fusobacterium nucleatum; Haemophilus influenza; Helicobacter pylori; Klebsiella pneumonia; Leptospira interrogans; Mannheimia haemolytica; Pasteurella multocida; Porphyromonas circumdentaria; Porphyromonas gingivalis; Prevotella intermedia; Prevotella loescheii; Prevotella melaninogenica; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Salmonella sp.; Shigella sp.; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Tannerella forsythia; Treponema denticola; Treponema pallidum and Yersinia pestis.
One skilled in the art readily recognizes that other antimicrobials may be used, either alone, or in combination with LL-37 to cover a wider range of bacteria.
The incorporation of an antimicrobial is also contemplated with respect to, e.g., a hand-held device for electrochemically monitoring an analyte in interstitial fluid of a user, such as that disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/835,696. Components of an exemplary device 34 are illustrated in
Although not shown, connective elements located e.g. in the inner wall of device 34 can serve to place elements 37, 39, and/or 50 (as described below) in contact with the controllable voltage source 38.
With further reference to
While the particular examples above are directed to certain exemplary transdermal devices, one skilled in the art appreciates that the antimicrobial nanofiber mat or coating may be incorporated into other medical equipment that invades the body, including, but not limited to syringes, catheters, etc.
As referenced briefly in the Background, the risk of infection at surgical and other wound sites dressed with sutures and/or other closure materials is an on-going concern. The antimicrobial nanofiber materials referenced above may form or be incorporated into various dressings including, but not limited to biodegradable fibrous mesh, biodegradable suture (e.g., a polymer) or non-biodegradable suture (e.g., silk nanofibers) containing LL-37 or other antimicrobial. As with the nanofiber mats described herein, these dressings form a barrier to foreign bodies.
The present application claims priority to and the benefit of similarly titled U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/200,421 filed Aug. 3, 2015, the entire substance of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4526176 | Bremer et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4708716 | Sibalis | Nov 1987 | A |
4775361 | Jacques et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4821733 | Peck | Apr 1989 | A |
4909256 | Peck | Mar 1990 | A |
5123902 | Muller et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5176881 | Sepaniak et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5203327 | Schoendorfer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5330527 | Montecalvo et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5362307 | Guy et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5380272 | Gross | Jan 1995 | A |
5422246 | Koopal et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458140 | Eppstein et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5591139 | Lin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5722397 | Eppstein | Mar 1998 | A |
5730714 | Guy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5801057 | Smart et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5885211 | Eppstein et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6056738 | Marchitto et al. | May 2000 | A |
6124597 | Shehada et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6233471 | Berner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6312393 | Abreu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6393318 | Conn et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6464687 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6730212 | Yamagishi et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6887202 | Currie et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7344499 | Prausnitz et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7655477 | Schneider et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7888509 | Wolf et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7931592 | Currie et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8568315 | Currie et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8929968 | Brister et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9332937 | Currie et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
20030225362 | Currie et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050182307 | Currie | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060115857 | Keen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070027383 | Peyser et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20090308742 | Paranjape | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100028504 | Perry | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100285084 | Yang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110042225 | Adeloju | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110229551 | Doshi | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120010487 | Currie et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120060589 | Gridelet et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120150004 | Currie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130041235 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140025000 | Currie et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20160025626 | Dos Santos Fegadolli | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 942 278 | Sep 1999 | EP |
H01-158343 | Jun 1989 | JP |
H05-172815 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H07-000541 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H09-140687 | Jun 1997 | JP |
WO 9742882 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9944507 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9958050 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0004832 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0015102 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 00018289 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 09025698 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2014149161 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014149514 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Using electrospun poly(ethylene-oxide) nanofibers for improved retention and efficacy of bacteriolytic antibiotics; John W. Gatti, Marie C. Smithgall, Shruti M. Paranjape, Ronda J. Rolfes, Makarand Paranjape; Biomedical Microdevices, Oct. 2013, vol. 15, Issue 5, pp. 887-893. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US16/45162, dated Oct. 21, 2016, 8 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,696 filed Mar. 15, 2013, Paranjape. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,392 filed Apr. 30, 2012, Paranjape, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/384,199 filed Mar. 15, 2013, Paranjape. |
Li, et al., “Multilayer Polypeptide Nanoscale Coatings Incorporating IL-12 for the Prevention of Biomedical Device-Associated Infections,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, Issue 13, pp. 2552-2558, May 2009. |
Li, et al., “Evaluation of Local MCP-1 and IL-12 Nanocoatings for Infection Prevention in Open Fractures,” J. Orthop. Res. 28(1):48-54, Jan. 2010. |
J. W. Gatti, et al., “Using Electrospun Poly(ethylene-Oxide) Nanofibers for Improved Retention and Efficacy of Bacteriolytic Antibiotics,” Biomed. Microdevices, vol. 15, Issue 5, pp. 887-893 (7 pp.), Oct. 2013. |
“Bio-Functionalized Nanofibers,” Pan-American Advanced Studies Institute (PASI), 7 pp., Aug. 4-12, 2011. |
J. W. Gatti, “Using Electrospun Poly(Ethylene-Glycol) Nanofibers for Localized Delivery of Antibiotics,” Senior Thesis, 44 pp. |
Ball, et al., “Drug-Eluting Fibers for HIV-1 Inhibition and Contraception,” PLOS ONE, vol. 7, Issue 11, 14 pp., Nov. 2012. |
Vandamme, et al., “A Comprehensive Summary of LL-37, the Factotum Human Cathelicidin Peptide,” Cellular Immunology 280, pp. 22-35, 2012. |
Song, et al., “Multi-Biofunction of Antimicrobial Peptide-Immobilized Silk Fibroin Nanofiber Membrane: Implications for Wound Healing,” Acta Biomater., vol. 39, pp. 146-155, Jul. 15, 2016. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Application No. AU 2013201044, dated Jan. 20, 2014, 4 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/19183, dated May 14, 2014, 7 pp. |
Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US01/17081, dated Sep. 15, 2004 (mailing date). |
International Search Report for App. No. PCT/US01/17081, dated Aug. 14, 2001. |
“SpectRX An Innovative Medical Technology Company” [online], Copyright 2004 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2004], 1 p., Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.spectrx.com. |
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US01/17081, dated Feb. 13, 2004 (mailing date). |
Schneider, T., et al., “B-Fit μSystem: Bio-Flips Integrable Transdermal MicroSystem,” ARO Workshop on Biomolecular Signaling, Energy, Transfer, and Transduction Processes, Cashiers, NC, May 14-17, 2000, 16 pp. |
Smith, Frederick P. and Kidwell, David A., “Cocaine in Hair, Saliva, Skin Swabs, and Urine of Cocaine Users' Children,” Forensic Science Intl., vol. 83, pp. 179-189, 1996. |
Balabanova, Vol Svetla and Schneider, E., “Detection of Drugs in Sweat (Nachweis von Drogen im Schweiß),” Beitr. Gerichtl. Med., vol. 48, pp. 45-49, 1990. |
Peck, Carl C., et al., “Outward Transcutaneous Chemical Migration: Implications for Diagnostics and Dosimetry,” Skin Pharmacol., vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 14-23, 1988. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 01 93 9501, dated Jan. 11, 2011. |
Phillips, Michael and McAloon, Margaret H., “A Sweat-Patch Test for Alcohol Consumption: Evaluation in Continuous and Episodic Drinkers,” Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 391-395, 1980. |
Henderson, Gary L. and Wilson, B. Kent, “Excretion of Methadone and Metabolites in Human Sweat,” Research Communications in Chemical Pathology and Pharmacology, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1-8, Jan. 1973. |
Paranjape, et al., “A PDMS Dermal Patch for Non-Intrusive Transdermal Glucose Sensing,” Sens. Actuat. A, 2003, vol. 104, pp. 195-204 (2003), Entire Document. |
Connolly, et al., “Minimally Invasive Sensing,” Ch. 18 of “Biosensors—Emerging Materials and Applications,” Jul. 2011, ISBN: 978-953-307-328-6, pp. 355-382 (Jul. 2011), entire documents [online], download from: http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/16435.pdf> on Mar. 30, 2013. |
PCT Communication for Application No. PCT/US2013/27126, filed Feb. 21, 2013, “Notification of the International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration,” dated Apr. 26, 2013. |
Zhang, et al., J. Matl. Sci. Matls. in Medicine 16 (2005), pp. 933-946. |
Martinez, et al., PNAS 105(5), 19606-19611 (2008). |
Martinez, et al., Anal. Chem., 82:3-10 (2010). |
Abe, et al., Analyt. Chem. 80 (2008) (6928-6934). |
Li, et al., Analyt. Chem. 80 (2008) (9131-9134). |
Chronakis, et al., Polymer 47(5): 1597-1603 (2006). |
Miao, et al., J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 10:5507-5519 (2010). |
Shiroma, et al., Analytica Chimica Acta 725 (2012) (44-50). |
Dungchai, et al., Analyt. Chem. 81 (2009) (5821-5826). |
Liu, et al., Matl. Sci. Eng. C27(1):57-60 (Jan. 2007). |
Yamada, et al., Chem. Lett. 26(3):201-202 (1997). |
Fortier, et al., Biosens. Bioelectronics 5:473-490 (1990). |
Paranjape, Makarand, “Pain-Free Diabetic Monitoring Using Transdermal Patches,” SPIE Newsroom, 2008, 2 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/11296, 6 pp., dated Feb. 25, 2015. |
Kastantin, Mark J., et al., “Integrated Fabrication of Polymeric Devices for Biological Applications,” Sensors and Materials, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 295-311, 2003. |
Gadre, A. P., et al., “Fabrication of a Fluid Encapsulated Dermal Patch Using Multilayered SU-8,” Sensors and Actuators A 114, pp. 478-485, 2004. |
Abdelrahman M. Abdelgawad, Samuel M. Hudson, Orlando J. Rojas, “Antimicrobial Wound Dressing Nanofiber Mats From Multicomponent (Chitosan/Silver-NPs/Polyvinyl Alcolol) Systems,” Carbohydrate Polymers, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/carbpol.2012.12.043 (2013) 13 pp. |
Bingyun, Li, et al., “Evaluation of Local MCP-1 and IL-12 Nanocoatings for Infection Prevention in Open Fractures,” Journal or Orthopaedic Research, 7 pp., Jan. 2020. |
Noore, Jabeen, et al., “Cationic Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37 is Effective Against Both Extra- and Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 1283-1290, Mar. 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170035331 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62200421 | Aug 2015 | US |