This invention relates generally to waste heat recovery systems and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for detecting a low charge of working fluid therein.
As used herein, the term “waste heat recovery system” includes distributed power generation systems, such as organic rankine cycle power plants, which use a pump to transport the refrigerant in the system. A typical waste heat recovery system includes an evaporator, a turbine, a condenser, and a pump. The evaporator absorbs heat from heat source, which causes the refrigerant in the evaporator to boil off into a gaseous state. The refrigerant flows from the evaporator outlet to a turbine, in which the refrigerant is expanded to a low pressure condition. From the turbine the refrigerant circulates first to a condenser, where the refrigerant is cooled to a liquid state, and then to a pump, after which the pressure is raised. From the pump, the refrigerant circulates back to the evaporator, and the cycle is repeated. Efficient and safe operation of the system requires that proper refrigerant circulation and an appropriate refrigerant charge level be maintained.
In respect to the need for maintaining a proper refrigerant circulation at the proper conditions, a superheat controller can be applied to sense the various conditions of refrigerant passing through the turbine and to responsively vary the speed of the pump in order to maintain the desired refrigerant conditions. Those conditions include maximum pressure and temperature levels as well as a minimum superheat level.
Separate from the issue of maintaining proper refrigerant conditions is that of maintaining a proper refrigerant charge. A low refrigerant charge condition may result in the pump reaching its maximum operating speed, after which point the thermal dynamic loop is no longer in control thereby causing serious problems, such as damage to the turbine due to reduced cooling capability because of high superheat. The problems also include pump damage due to cavitations, reduction in plant efficiency, and reliability. In addition, low charge condition also means undesirable emission of refrigerant gases into the environment.
Most known low-charge detection systems have been developed for use in air conditioning systems. These systems use a combination of two or more temperature sensors, pressure switches, or pressure transducers. They tend to be particularly unreliable for the application in waste heat recovery systems.
Briefly, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, a baseline operating trajectory of a superheat controller is developed as a reference for comparison with periodic operating trajectories for purposes of determining the degree of deviation between the two, with the degree of deviation being an indication of a low charge of working fluid.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, provision is made to take appropriate action, such as to provide a warning to the operator or a shutting down of the system, in response to a perceived low charge of working fluid.
By yet another aspect of the invention, in addition to the monitoring of deviation from the baseline operating trajectory, further steps are taken to verify the low charge working fluid condition. A monitoring of the pressure oscillations, and a further monitoring of the power oscillations of the variable speed pump motor, provide further indications as to whether or not a low charge of working fluid condition exists.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, a preferred embodiment is depicted; however, various other modifications and alternate constructions can be made thereto without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Referring now to
Energy is provided to the ORC by way of the vapor generator 20, with the energy coming from a heat source which may otherwise transfer heat to the environment in the form of waste heat. An example of such a heat source is a mirco-turbine, with heat being given off at its exhaust and by its engine coolants. Typical pressures and temperatures are 15 psia and 689° F. for the fluid going into the vapor generator and 14.7 psia and 152° F. for the fluid being discharged from the vapor generator 20.
The working fluid being circulated in the ORC is a refrigerant, with a preferred refrigerant being R-245fa. Typical pressures and temperatures of a working fluid are shown to be 400 psia and 300° F. as it leaves the vapor generator, 32 psia and 232° F. as it leaves the turbine 15 and enters the condenser 13, and 31 psia and 87° F. as it leaves the condenser 13. The ORC is designed to operate with a desired amount of refrigerant charge, and if that amount is decreased, by leakage or the like, then the system will not operate properly and may result in damage to its components such as the pump or the turbine. The present invention addresses this problem as will described hereinafter.
In addition to the need for maintaining a sufficient charge of working fluid, it is also necessary to maintain a proper working condition of the refrigerant entering the turbine 15 in order to maintain desired efficiency and reliability. That is, the condition of the working fluid leaving the vapor generator 20 and entering the turbine 15 must meet the following criteria: 1) the maximum pressure limit must not be exceed, 2) the maximum temperature limit must not be exceed and 3) the superheat must not approach 0. In addition, the condition of the working fluid should be maintained in such a manner as to maintain a sufficiently high pressure in order to maximize the power efficiency of the system.
The superheat controller 19 is a feedback controller that regulates the superheat of the refrigerant leaving the vapor generator 20 to a fixed set point value. The controller 19 uses the measurements of a refrigerant pressure and the transducer 21 temperature sensor 22 leaving the evaporator to calculate the superheat according to the thermodynamic property of the working fluid. The calculated superheat is compared with the set point value, and the deviation between the calculated value and set point value is eliminated by the controller by adjusting the pump rotation speed. It is the operating characteristics of the superheat controller 19 which are used to detect a low charge condition in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention as will now be described.
Due to the control action of the superheat controller 19, there exists a well defined relationship between high side pressure and the pump rotational speed, when the charge of the working fluid is at a normal operational level. This relationship is shown in
Curve B, on the other hand, shows reduced high side pressures that result from the refrigerant charge in the system being reduced to a level below the desired level. The difference between these two curves can be used as a basis for determining whether a low charge condition exist as will now be described.
Referring now to
In step 2, a window of data points are collected and prepared according to a predefined format. The data include pump rotation speed, high side working fluid pressure, and pump power. The high side pressure can be measured at the evaporator exit. The pressure and power data are arranged in accordance with the pump rotation speed.
In step 4, the prepared actual pressure data corresponding to different rotation speeds are compared with the pre-stored reference trajectory in step 3, which is a predefined relationship between the pump rotation speed in Hz and high side pressure in psia. This relationship defines the required speed at a certain value of high side system pressure.
In step 5, if deviation is detected between the actual trajectory and the reference trajectory the process is shifted to step 8, where the deviation is further evaluated against a limit. If the limit is exceeded, this indicates that a serious low charge condition has occurred, and the waste heat recovery system should be shut down immediately for safety reasons. After step 8, the process is directed to step 10, in which the system is safely shutdown.
If, in step 8, the deviation is considered not serious, this indicates that the low charge condition is not detrimental to the integrity of the waste heat recovery system. In this case, the process is taken to step 7, in which a warning signal is issued to the operator such that additional charge can be added without shutting down the entire system. After step 7, the process goes back to the start for continuation of the detection procedure.
In step 5, if the deviation is not detected, then, the process is directed to step 6, in which the pressure and power data are analyzed for any occurrence of high frequency signal contents such as persistent oscillations and spikes. If high frequency signal contents are detected, then the pump is likely undergoing cavitations. Serious pump cavitations are detrimental to the health of the pump, and stability of the system operation. Therefore the system master controller is notified such that remedy actions can be taken in time to stop the cavitations. After step 6, the process is led back to the start to continue the detection process.
Shown in
Under low pressure conditions, the controller operating trajectory is not much different from the reference trajectory. This is because the reduced charge is able to sustain the requirement of low pressure system. However when the system pressure approaches the designed high pressure working condition, the controller trajectory starts to deviate away from the reference. As soon as the needed charge is refilled, the operating point is driven back to a point on the reference trajectory.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment as illustrated in the drawings, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the true sprit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3630022 | Jubb | Dec 1971 | A |
4165616 | Pierpoline | Aug 1979 | A |
4386499 | Raviv et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4590384 | Bronicki | May 1986 | A |
4593527 | Nakamoto et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4617808 | Edwards | Oct 1986 | A |
4760705 | Yogev et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4876854 | Owens | Oct 1989 | A |
4901531 | Kubo et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5038567 | Mortiz | Aug 1991 | A |
5119635 | Harel | Jun 1992 | A |
5339632 | McCrabb et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5598706 | Bronicki et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5632143 | Fisher et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640842 | Bronicki | Jun 1997 | A |
5664419 | Kaplan | Sep 1997 | A |
5761921 | Hori et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5809782 | Bronicki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5860279 | Bronicki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6009711 | Kreiger et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6101813 | Sami et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128901 | Sha | Oct 2000 | A |
6497090 | Bronicki et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6539718 | Bronicki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6539720 | Rouse et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6539723 | Bronicki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571548 | Bronicki et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6892522 | Brasz et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
20020148225 | Lewis | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030029169 | Hanna et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030089110 | Niikura et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030167769 | Bharathan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19630559 | Jan 1998 | DE |
19907512 | Aug 2000 | DE |
10029732 | Jan 2002 | DE |
1243758 | Sep 2002 | EP |
52046244 | Apr 1977 | JP |
54045419 | Apr 1979 | JP |
54060634 | May 1979 | JP |
55091711 | Jul 1980 | JP |
58055409 | May 1983 | JP |
58122308 | Jul 1983 | JP |
59043928 | Mar 1984 | JP |
59054712 | Mar 1984 | JP |
59063310 | Apr 1984 | JP |
59138707 | Aug 1984 | JP |
59158303 | Aug 1984 | JP |
60158561 | Aug 1985 | JP |
06088523 | Mar 1994 | JP |
2002266655 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002285805 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002285907 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003161101 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003161114 | Jun 2003 | JP |
9806791 | Feb 1998 | WO |
02099279 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03078800 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050132704 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |