1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to apparatus and methods for determining a refractive index of a fluid and one or more properties or characteristics of the fluid therefrom, such as fluid recovered from subsurface formations.
2. Description of the Related Art
During both drilling of a wellbore and after drilling, fluid (oil, gas and water) from the formation is often extracted to determine the nature of the hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon-bearing formations. Fluid samples are often collected in sample chambers and the collected samples are tested to determine various properties of the extracted formation fluid. To drill a well, drilling fluid is circulated under pressure greater than the pressure of the formation in which the well is drilled. The drilling fluid invades or penetrates into the formation surrounding the wellbore to varying depths, referred to as the invaded zone. The drilling fluid contaminates the original (virgin) fluid present in the invaded zone. To collect samples of the original fluid present in the formation, a formation testing tool is often conveyed into the wellbore. A pump typically extracts the fluid from the formation via a sealed probe placed against the inside wall of the wellbore. A fluid identification device is typically utilized to determine the contamination level in the fluid. When the fluid is initially extracted, it contains high amounts of the drilling fluid filtrate. The extracted fluid is typically discarded into the wellbore until the fluid identification device measurements indicate that an acceptably low level of contamination has been achieved. Refractometers have been utilized to determine or infer the contamination level in the formation fluids during extraction. Current downhole refractometers are typically based on measurements related to the reflection of light at a window-fluid interface, such as the critical angle of reflection or the intensity of the reflection (at near-normal incidence). Such refractometers are primarily sensitive to the interface region between the fluid and a transparent window (often sapphire) immersed in the fluid, which interface region is only few microns (wavelengths of light) of the fluid beyond the refractometer window that is immersed in the fluid of interest. Often, the refractometer window accumulates a thin film of deposits from the formation fluid. The refractive index measurements then become less reliable because they, at least in part, depend upon the refractive index of this film, and, if the film is thick enough, they only depend on the refractive index of the film.
The disclosure herein provides a refractometer that is substantially unaffected by certain deposits on the window and may be more reliably utilized in downhole tools for determining characteristics of a formation fluid.
In one aspect, an apparatus for determining a property of a fluid is disclosed that in one embodiment may include a transparent window member having an axis and a first end substantially perpendicular to the axis and a second end having an outer surface at a first angle with respect to that axis, a light source directing light at the first end, a detector placed a selected distance beyond the transparent window member from the second end, the space between the second end and the detector containing a fluid, wherein the detector detects the location at which a beam of light exiting from the outer surface at a second angle to the axis and transmitted through the fluid strikes the detector, and a controller for determining the second angle from the location where this light strikes the detector. A processor determines the bulk fluid refractive index from the light detected by the detector and a property of the fluid therefrom.
In another aspect, the apparatus includes a first refractometer for determining a bulk fluid refractive index of a fluid from a light transmitted through a selected fluid and a second refractometer for determining a refractive index of the interface-region fluid based on a reflection of the light from the fluid-window interface. A processor may determine a quality level of one of the determined refractive indices relative to the other and also may determine one or more properties of the selected fluid from one or both of the determined indices.
Examples of certain features of the apparatus and methods disclosed herein are summarized rather broadly in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood. There are, of course, additional features of the apparatus and methods disclosed hereinafter that will form the subject of the claims.
For detailed understanding of the present disclosure, references should be made to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A pump 130 is coupled to the inner probe 110 via a fluid line 132 for withdrawing fluid 111a from formation 102 via line 110a. To draw or extract fluid 111a from formation 102, pump 130 is activated, which extracts the fluid 111a into line 110a. The extracted fluid may be pumped into a chamber 136 via a flow control device 134 or discharged into the wellbore 101 via a fluid line 141 and the flow control device 134. A pump 140 is coupled to the outer probe 150 via a fluid line 142 for withdrawing fluid 111b from formation 102 via line 150a. To draw or extract fluid 111b from formation 102, pump 140 is activated to extract the fluid 111b into line 150a and thus line 142. The fluid withdrawn into line 142 may be discharged into the wellbore 101 via a line 144 and valve 145 or into a collection chamber 148 via line 146 and valve 147.
The tool 120 further includes a controller 170 that contains circuits 172 for use in operating various components of the tool 120, a processor 174, such as a microprocessor, a data storage device 176, such as a solid state memory, and programs 178 accessible to the processor 174 for executing instruction contained therein. The system 100 also includes a controller 190 at the surface that contains circuits 192, a processor 194, a data storage device 196 and programs 198 accessible to processor for executing instructions contained therein. Controllers 170 and 190 are in a two-way communication with each other and either alone or in combination may control the operation of the various devices in tool 120.
To obtain clean formation fluid samples, the tool 120 is conveyed and placed at a selected depth in the wellbore 101. Pads 160a and 160b are activated to contact the wellbore wall 101a. The inner probe 110 and outer probe 150 are activated to urge against the wellbore wall 101a to seal the probes 110 and 150 against the wellbore wall 101a. In one aspect, both the inner and outer probes 110 and 150 are activated simultaneously or substantially simultaneously. Pumps 130 and 140 are activated to draw the formation fluid into their respective probes. Activating pump 140 causes the fluid 111b around the probe 110 to flow into the outer probe 150, while activating pump 130 causes the fluid 111a to flow into the inner probe 110. The fluid initially drawn through the probes 110 and 150 (111a and 111b) is the fluid present in the invaded zone and is thus contaminated. A fluid evaluation or testing device 185 may be used to determine when the fluid 111a being withdrawn from probe 110 is sufficiently clean so that fluid samples may be collected. Similarly, a fluid evaluation device 186 may be utilized to determination the contamination level of the fluid 111b withdrawn from probe 150. Any device, including, but not limited to, an optical device, may be utilized for determining contamination in the withdrawn fluids. As long as the contamination in the fluid 111a being withdrawn from probe 110 is above a threshold or is otherwise not satisfactory, such fluid may be discharged into the wellbore 101 via a flow control device 135 and fluid line 141. Once the fluid 111a is clean (e. e., below a threshold), the fluid may be collected in sample chamber 136 by opening valve 134 and closing valve 135, The pump 140 continues to pump the fluid 111b from the probe 150 into the wellbore 101 or into chamber 148. The pumps and flow control devices in the tool 120 may be controlled by the controller 170 according to instructions stored in programs 178 and/or instructions provided by the surface controller 190. Alternatively, controller 190 may control the operation of one or more devices in the tool 120 according to instructions provided by programs 198.
Still referring to
As noted above, fluid identification devices 185 and 186 respectively mat be utilized for determining one or more characteristics of the formation fluid. In one aspect, the tool 120 may utilize a refractometer for determining the characteristics of the fluid downhole.
The light beam 222 from the filter 220 is directed to the transparent member 230. In one configuration, the transparent member 230 may have an axis 232, a first end 234 having a vertical or substantially vertical surface 234a, and a second end 236 having a surface 236a at an angle θ1 relative to the longitudinal axis 232. In one aspect, the face 236a may include a polished surface 236b. The light beam 222 is directed to the vertical face 234a of the transparent member 230. The light beam 222 travels through the transparent member 230 along an axial path 233, which path, in one aspect, may coincide with the axis 232 of the transparent member 232. The light beam 222 exits the face 236b of the transparent member 232 as a light beam 240 at an angle θ2 relative to the axis 232 of the transparent member 230. The light beam 240 passes through a fluid 250 and impinges on the detector 260. The detector 260 detects the location of light beam 240 and provides signals 262 relating to the detected light to a circuit 280. In one aspect, the circuit 280 conditions, processes and digitizes the signals 262 and provides the digitized signals 282 to a controller 290. The controller 290 determines the angle θ2 from the signals 282 and the bulk fluid refractive index of the fluid 250 therefrom and may determine a property of interest or a characteristic of the fluid 250 from the determined refractive index, n. In aspects, the property of interest may include, but is not limited to, an estimated fluid density based on correlation to the Clausius-Mossotti ratio, (n2−1)/(n2+2), an estimated brine salinity or gas dryness based on n, or the carbon dioxide content of natural gas based on n.
Downhole refractometers typically are based on reflection critical angle measurements or reflection intensity. Such refractometers, in general, provide optical measurements of an interface-fluid that is only a few microns of fluid beyond the refractometer window immersed in the fluid. If the refractometer window is not perfectly or near perfectly clean but has a thin film of deposits from the formation fluid, then optical measurements for such deposits will be erroneously included in the measurement of the refractive index of the fluid. The above described apparatus 200 and methods measure a bulk-reading rather than the measurements relating to the interface fluid as performed by the current downhole refractometers. In the apparatus of
Still referring to
Still referring to
In operation, the fluid 250 passes through the device 200, the detector continuously or continually detects the light beam 240 and the controller 290 determines the angle and the refractive index of the fluid 250. In one aspect, the controller 290 includes a processor 292, such as a microprocessor, a data storage device 294, such as memory device and programs 296 containing instructions for execution by the processor 292. The controller may be located in the downhole tool, such as tool 120,
In one aspect, a point light source 310 may be placed or attached to a selected location 312 on the transparent member 320 to direct light 312a of suitable wavelengths into the transparent member 320 at point 312. A light beam 314 is directed toward the aperture 325, which light beam passes through the angled transparent section 330 and then refracts off the surface 332 at an angle θ2 providing a light beam 335. Light beam 335 enters the transparent member 340 at an angle θ3 and impinges on the detector 360 as light beam 345. The detector 360 may be placed on or proximate the transparent member 340 to detect light 345 passing through the transparent member 340. A circuit, such as circuit 280,
Thus, in an aspect, a point light source is attached to an optically transparent and pressure resistant transparent member or window. A portion of the light is directed to the fluid under an angle range, which includes the angle of total reflection. Light reflected from the fluid is detected by a first photodetector array up to the angle of total reflection. The critical angle is the angle beyond which there is total reflection and it is equal to the arcsine of the ratio of other medium's refractive index to the incident medium's refractive index based on Snell's Law n1 sin θ1=n2 sin θ2, when θ2 relative to the normal to the surface equals its maximum value of 90 degrees. Therefore, the position of the light/dark shadow on the first detector array is a measure of refractive index of the fluid. A second portion of the light from the point source passes a small orifice before it enters a prism. On the interface between the prism and fluid the light beam is bent according to the Snell's Law. It passes the fluid and a second pressure resistant window before it is detected by a second photodiode array. The position of the light beam on the second photodiode array is a measure of refractive index of the fluid. A comparison of the bulk-fluid reading to the interface-fluid reading allows determination of whether the interface fluid is different than the bulk fluid because of precipitation of wax or asphaltenes on the window, bubble formation or dew condensation, which often occurs first at a solid surface such as a window, or other anomalies that result in differences between the interface fluid and the bulk fluid.
In one aspect the arrangements for determining both the bulk fluid refractive index and the refractive index from reflection as shown in
While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4641965 | Harmer | Feb 1987 | A |
5167149 | Mullins et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5201220 | Mullins et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210404 | Cush | May 1993 | A |
5696580 | Kubo et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6172746 | Byrne et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6683681 | DiFoggio et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6731380 | Amara et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6842256 | Hill | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6997055 | DiFoggio | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016026 | DiFoggio et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7061597 | Oberleitner et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7637151 | Raghuraman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7788972 | Terabayashi et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7852468 | DiFoggio | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8109157 | Kanayama et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20030095248 | Frot | May 2003 | A1 |
20040109156 | DiFoggio et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040130706 | Frot | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050110989 | Schermer | May 2005 | A1 |
20090103085 | Hu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122300 | Wu | May 2009 | A1 |
20090279074 | Seaver | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110188030 | Verschuren | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110203386 | Johansen | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120081698 | Christian et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130214138 | Chiarello | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140132951 | Georis | May 2014 | A1 |
20140300889 | DiFoggio | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160018326 | Jeanotte | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
EP 2543839 | Jan 2013 | BE |
WO 2008107336 | Sep 2008 | DE |
2005257319 | Sep 2005 | JP |
WO 9802730 | Jan 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
http://www.newport.com/How-to-Clean-Optics/141176/1033/content.aspx. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2014/032630; International Filing Date: Apr. 2, 2014; Date of Mailing: Jul. 28, 2014; pp. 1-10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140300889 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |