Photovoltaic (PV) installations may include a large number of components and wide variety of devices. A PV installation may include one or more arrays of PV generators (such as solar modules, solar cells, solar panels), one or more inverter(s), communication devices, and PV power devices such as DC/DC: converters, DC-AC microinverters, combiner boxes, and Maximum-Power-Point-Tracking (MPPT) devices. Some installations may further include batteries. Some of the electronic modules may be integrated with the PV modules and may provide other functions such as monitoring of performance and/or protection against theft. In case of the system experiencing power loss or in case of a potentially unsafe condition, it may be desirable for a system maintenance operator to physically locate a particular device (such as solar panel, DC-DC converter or micro-inverter) that may be potentially responsible for the power loss or potentially unsafe condition.
Operators and monitoring bodies of PV installations might not always have access to a map which indicates the location of each PV module, identified by a serial number. In such cases, troubleshooting problems may be time consuming, since locating a specific module, such as a malfunctioning module, may be difficult. In other instances, a map of the installation may be obtained by significant manual effort, such as a maintenance worker walking through the installation and copying ID numbers off modules, denoting their location on a map. When performed manually, human error may also cause inaccurate information to be recorded in the maps.
There is a need for an automatic or semi-automatic method of generating physical maps of PV installations, to save work and reduce errors, while allowing system monitoring personnel to obtain the benefits of having a map which indicates the locations and ID numbers of PV modules.
The following summary is a short summary of some of the inventive concepts for illustrative purposes only, and is not intended to limit or constrain the examples in the detailed description. One skilled in the art will recognize other novel combinations and features from the detailed description.
Embodiments herein may employ methods for generating maps of PV installations. Some illustrative embodiments may be fully automatic, and some may require manual steps.
In illustrative methods, a suitable localization algorithm may be utilized to measure or estimate the global coordinates of photovoltaic (PV) devices, and/or the distance and/or angle between different devices, and/or the distance and/or angle between devices and known locations. Some embodiments may include obtaining the global coordinates of devices. Some embodiments may produce a map displaying the physical placement and location of devices along with identifying information (such as ID or serial numbers). Some embodiments may utilize high-accuracy Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to map the installation. For example, some illustrative methods may include scanning an identifying barcode on PV devices while using GPS to obtain the global coordinates at each scanned location. In some embodiments, a map not including identifying module information may be further utilized to match specific modules to the measured GPS coordinates. Some embodiments may include PV devices transmitting and receiving wireless signals from one another, and using measured or estimated quantities such as Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI), Angle of Arrival (AOA, also known as Direction of Arrival, or DOA) and/or Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) to estimate relative distances and/or angles between modules. In some embodiments, Power Line Communication (PLC) methods may be used along with Time Domain Reflection (TDR) techniques to estimate the location of a set of PV devices within a PV installation. The set of estimates may be processed to obtain an accurate physical map of the installation, including identifying where each PV module and/or PV device is physically located.
In other illustrative methods, photovoltaic modules may be operated to increase and decrease the electrical power produced by the photovoltaic modules, which may result in a change of temperature at the photovoltaic modules. A thermal imaging device may be used to capture thermal images of a group of photovoltaic modules under different power production and temperature conditions, and suitable methods may analyze and aggregate the thermal images to obtain an accurate physical map of the installation.
In other illustrative methods, aspects of electronic systems may be used to determine the order of photovoltaics (PV) panels connected in a serial string. Each PV panel may be connected to an electronic device (such as a power converter) as an intermediate device between the PV panel and the serial string. The device may set or change an electrical parameter, such as an impedance, a voltage, and/or the like, measured or reflected at the electrical conductor that serially connects PV panels. When a device connected as part of the string, such as a device connected at the end of the string, the middle of the string, the beginning of the string, and/or the like, transmits a signal along the conductor, the power devices (such as devices including converters) may each measure the received signal at each power converter and transmit the recorded signal to the same or a different device to analyze the order of the devices of the string.
In other illustrative methods, an order of power devices connected in a serial string may be determined. A command is transmitted, to at least one first power device of a plurality of power devices, to change an output electrical parameter. At least one electrical signal is caused to be transmitted from at least one second power device of the plurality of power devices. At least one measured value responsive to the electrical signal is received from at least one of the plurality of power devices. A determination is made, by analyzing the at least one measured value, which ones of the plurality of power devices are ordered in the serial string between the at least one first power device and the at least one second power device.
In other illustrative embodiments, a power device includes a communication interface configured to receive commands; at least one hardware controller; at least two output conductors; and an adjustment circuit configured to adjust an output electrical parameter of at least one of the at least two output conductors. The adjustment is responsive to the received command, and wherein the at least one hardware controller is configured to (i) perform the adjustment based on the received command, and (ii) measure an electrical signal transmitted on at least one of the at least two output conductors.
In other illustrative embodiments, an ordering of power devices of a power generation system is provided, wherein the power devices are connected in a serial string. The power generation system includes a plurality of power devices each comprising a plurality of electrical output conductors, wherein each of the plurality of power devices is configured to adjust an electrical output parameter of the plurality of electrical output conductors. The power generation system also includes at least one transmitting power device of the plurality of power devices configured to transmit an electrical signal. The power generation system further includes at least one receiving power device of the plurality of power devices configured to receive and record the electrical signal, wherein the at least one receiving power device comprises a communication interface for sending a recorded electrical signal. The power generation also includes at least one hardware processor. The hardware processor is configured to command at least one of the plurality of power devices to adjust an electrical output parameter. The hardware processor is also configured to command the at least one transmitting power device to transmit the electrical signal. The hardware processor is further configured to command the at least one receiving power device configured to receive the electrical signal, record at least one value of the electrical signal, and send the recorded electrical signal value. The hardware processor is also configured to receive the recorded electrical signal values. The hardware processor is still further configured to analyze the recorded electrical signal values to determine an ordering at least in part of the plurality of power devices.
As noted above, this summary is merely a summary of some of the features described herein. It is not exhaustive, and it is not to be a limitation on the claims.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present disclosure will become better understood with regard to the following description, claims, and drawings. The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example, and not limited by, the accompanying figures. A more complete understanding of the present disclosure and the advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description in consideration of the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:
In the following description of various illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, various embodiments in which aspects of the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural and functional modifications may be made, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Monitoring of PV installations may include data collected by a central control system which monitors the power output by the PV installation and identifies potentially problematic operating conditions or safety hazards. When the installation experiences power loss, it may be desirable to ascertain whether it is due to environmental conditions or from malfunctions and/or poor maintenance of the components of the PV installation. Furthermore, it may be desirable to easily physically locate the particular module (such as solar panel, DC-DC converter or micro-inverter, combiner box) that may be responsible for the power loss. A map of the PV installation which displays the physical location of the various PV modules or devices (identified by ID numbers, for example) comprising the installation may assist in rapid location of the desired module and fast resolution of the problem. For example, in case of a decrease in the power output by a PV panel, a power device coupled to the panel may send information to a centralized control unit reporting the loss of power. The information may be transmitted using power line communications, wireless communication, acoustic communication or other protocols, and may include the ID number of the PV device. When the low power output persists, a maintenance worker may need to physically go to the underperforming panel and investigate the reason behind the low power.
A Physical Identification Map (PIM) may refer to a physical map indicating the location of modules within a photovoltaic (PV) installation, including attaching identifying information such as serial or ID numbers to some or all of the modules displayed in the map. A Non-Identifying Map (NIM) may refer to a map that describes the location of modules but does not identify a specific module at each location.
At step 100, an initial map of a PV installation layout may be created. The initial map may be a physical map. For example, at step 100, measured. Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates may be used to match modules to physical locations on a PIM. The initial map may be created and represented in various ways. In one implementation, the initial map may be represented as a text file which includes information regarding the number of devices, the number of rows, the distances between devices, the distances between rows, or any other information relevant to the physical layout of the installation. In another implementation, the basic map may be automatically generated by installation-design software, and the layout information may be encoded in a digital file generated by the installation-design software.
In some embodiments, step 100 might not be performed. For example, step 100 might not be performed when there is high enough accuracy in other steps of the method to compensate for the lack of an initial map.
In steps 110-13, power modules in the PV installation may be scanned. For example, the power modules may be scanned by rows. At step 110 each device in a row of the PV installation may be scanned. The scanning may be carried out using a locating device that combines scanning capabilities with a GPS receiver. The locating device may further include one or more of a clock, memory, communication means and a processing unit. Scanning may comprise utilizing a barcode reader to read a barcode which is attached to the module being scanned (such as a barcode on a sticker which is stuck to the module), utilizing a camera to identify serial numbers, obtaining identifying information from an RFID tag, or any combinations thereof. The locating device may be a smartphone running an application which combines barcode reading or serial number identifying with UPS localization. The scanning may comprise taking a picture of an identifying element of the module (such as an identification sticker) which may later be processed to identify the module based on the picture. In some embodiments, in step 111 the user may configure the device (such as by press of a button) at the start of each row to begin logging a row of the installation. In some embodiments, the locating device may use time or spatial differences between scans to determine when a new row is being scanned. For example, when a time between scans is above a certain threshold, the locating device may determine that a new row is being scanned.
At step 112 each PV device in the current row may be scanned. Each time a device is scanned, the module's identifying information (such as barcode, ID number, picture, RFID tag) as well as the GPS coordinates of the locating device at the time of scanning may be logged and stored into memory. The identifying information corresponding to a device may be unique. A timestamp of the time of scanning may also be logged or stored.
At step 113 it may be determined when all rows of the installation have been scanned. For example, it may be determined when A rows within a specified area have been scanned. When all rows have been scanned, the method may proceed to step 120. Otherwise, steps 110-13 may be repeated. Steps 110-13 may be repeated until all rows of the installation, or all devices within the installation, have been scanned.
At step 120, the data (such as coordinates, timestamps) collected during steps 110-13 may be collected and input to a matching algorithm. The map created in step 100 may also be input to the matching algorithm.
At step 130, the matching algorithm may be run by an appropriate computing device, such as a computer, server, DSP, microcontroller, ASIC or FPGA. The algorithm may use the inputted data and/or the map to determine which PV module is located at each of the locations indicated on the map.
At step 140, the matching algorithm may generate, based on the input received at step 120, a map of the PV installation. The map may comprise one or more module identifiers. The module identifiers may be associated with a location in the map. For example, the algorithm may output a map with module identification information being displayed at each module's location. The map may be physically printed onto a sheet of paper, or viewed on an appropriate electronic device such as a computer monitor, tablet or smartphone.
At step 131, a map and/or GPS coordinates may be received. For example, the map and/or GPS coordinates may be loaded from memory. The map and/or GPS coordinates may have been measured when scanning PV modules. The received map may comprise a non-identifying (NIM), which might not include identifying module information.
At step 132, the GPS measurements may be grouped into rows. In some embodiments, the grouping into rows may be done while scanning one or more modules. For example, a scanning operator may press a reset button when beginning to scan, or prior to scanning, each row. In some embodiments, the grouping of measurements into rows may be carried out by a computer algorithm, using methods further described herein. The grouping of measurements into rows may be helpful, for example, when the PIM is generated using an NIM, which already indicates the number of rows and the length of each row. In embodiments in which the PIM is generated without benefit of a pre-existing NIM, the grouping into rows may allow for filtering of measurement noise. For example, filtering, or reduction, of measurement noise may be performed by determining the standard distance and angle between adjacent panels in a same row. Steps 133-37 may be performed iteratively, until the first row of scanned samples has been considered as a candidate to represent each row of the installation. At step 133, a row is selected from the NIM. At step 134, the first row of location measurements may be fit to the selected row. At step 135, having fit the first row of location measurements to the selected row, the other rows of measured samples may be fit to the other rows of the NIM, using “snap to grid” or similar methods. In some embodiments, attempted fitting of the other rows of measured samples to the other NIM rows may be carried out multiple times, using multiple row orientations, before an optimal fitting (by an appropriate criterion such as Least Squares) is selected.
At step 136, a total fitting error may be calculated. The total fitting error may be based on the estimated locations of each device and/or the locations indicated by the NIM. Estimated individual errors of each device may be aggregated by an appropriate criterion, such as Sum of Squares. The selected fitting and resultant aggregated error may be stored. For example, the selected fitting and resultant aggregated error may be stored in an appropriate memory device.
At step 137, the method may determine when all NIM rows have been considered as the row represented by the first row of measurements. When some NIM rows have not been considered the method may loop back to step 134. For example, the NIM rows that have not been considered may be candidates for consideration in later iterations. When it is determined, at step 137, that all NIM rows have been considered, the method may proceed to step 138.
At step 138, one or more aggregated errors calculated and stored at step 136 may be compared to one another to select a fitting. In one implementation, a fitting corresponding to the minimum aggregated error may be selected. Other factors may be considered at step 138.
At step 139, the fitting selected at step 138 may be output, transforming the NIM to a PIM that includes the fitting selected at step 138. In some embodiments, steps 134-37 may be modified such that instead of fitting the first row of measurements to each row in the NIM, each row of measurements is fitted to a certain row of the NIM (for example, the first row of the NIM).
Reference is now made to
In
Reference is now made to
At step 137, the method may loop back to step 133, as the first row of measurements has been fit to the first NIM, and other map rows have not been fit. At step 134, the first row of measurements is fit to the second NIM row, and at step 135, the other EL rows are “snapped” to the NIM and fitted to the other NIM rows, as shown in Fitting B. The matching illustrated in Fitting B is less successful than the one shown in Fitting A, and the fitting error calculated in step 136 may be higher. At step 137, the method may determine that the first row of measurements has not yet been fit to one of the NIM rows (the third), and it may loop back to step 133 and select the third NIM row. At step 134, the first row of measurements may be fit to the third NIM row, and at step 135, the other EL rows may be “snapped” to the NIM and fitted to the other NIM rows. Several fittings are possible, as illustrated by Fitting C and Fitting D, and by various methods the algorithm may be configured to consider multiple fittings and select one of the fittings, for example, a fitting with minimal estimation error or a least estimation error. At step 136 the fitting error may be calculated, and at step 137 the algorithm may determine that the first row of measurements has now been fit to all of the NIM rows, and may proceed to step 138. At step 138, the algorithm may determine that Fitting A has the lowest estimation error of all the fittings considered, and may output Fitting A at step 139.
The method of
At step 310, a time difference between each pair of consecutive scans may be calculated. At step 320 the calculated time differences may be compared to a threshold amount of time. In some embodiments the threshold may be preset or predefined, and in some embodiments the threshold may be derived from calculated time differences (such as the threshold may be twenty percent longer than an average time difference between consecutive scans). At step 330, when the time difference between the timestamps of scanning two consecutive devices is above the threshold, the two devices may be determined to be in different rows, and may be mapped to different rows at step 340. When the time difference is below the threshold, the two devices may be determined to be in a same row, and mapped to the same row at step 350. Alternatively, or in addition to the method described above, the installer may be instructed to press a “New Row” button on his or her device between rows, which may indicate completing the scanning of one row and beginning another. The “New Row” button may be used to override timing considerations, and/or to compensate for inconsistent scanning speed.
Reference is now made to
At step 335, the distance and/or angle between two devices, which may have been scanned consecutively, are compared to the reference distance and/or angle. If, at step 335, it is determined that the distance and/or angle are above the threshold, the two devices may be mapped to different rows, or strings, at step 345. If, at step 335, it is determined that the distance and/or angle are below the threshold, the two devices may be mapped to a same row, or string, at step 355. Alternatively, or in addition to the method described above, the installer may be instructed to press a “New Row” button on his or her device between rows, which may indicate him or her completing the scanning of one row and beginning another. The “New Row” button may be used to override distance and/or angle considerations, and/or to compensate for inconsistent distances and/or angles between devices in the same row.
Reference is now made to
At step 102, of
Reference is now made to
Scanning and localization device 601 may capture or record data provided by the ID marker 600. For example, the device 601 may be configured to obtain the identifying information from PV device 602, by scanning, taking a picture of, or retrieving data stored by the ID marker 600. Device 601 may include a clock and memory device, and be configured to store the timestamp of each scan along with the identifying information of the device scanned at that time. Device 601 may include a localization device such as a UPS device, configured to communicate with satellites 603 and estimate the location of the device at the time of scanning. In one implementation, the UPS methods employed may allow for estimates with sufficient accuracy to provide differentiation between adjacent PV devices deployed in the same installation.
Reference is now made to
In some embodiments, the device 700 may include GPS device 201, configured to receive or determine a GPS location, for example, when scanning a PV device. The device 700 may write (such as record, store, transmit, and/or the like) the ID information and GPS coordinates to data logging device 202. The data logging device 202 may comprise flash memory, EEPROM, or other memory devices.
Controller 205 may synchronize the various components comprising device 700. The controller 205 may comprise a DSP, MCU, ASIC, FPGA, and/or a different control unit. The controller may be split into several control units, each responsible for different components. Device 700 may include communication device 206. The communication device 206 may be configured to communicate using a wireless technology such as ZigBee, Bluetooth, cellular protocols, and/or other communication protocols. In some embodiments, measurements, timestamps and/or ID information may be transmitted, for example, by the communication device 206, to a remote server and/or stored to memory at a remote location. Device 700 may include clock 204, configured to sample, store, and/or communicate the time (in conjunction with the memory device and/or communication devices). For example, the clock 204 may be used to record a timestamp each time the ID reader 203 determines (such as obtains, measures, and/or the like) a device ID.
Device 700 may further include tilt sensor 207, configured to measure the tilt of the device 700 and store the measurement to memory and/or communicate the measurement. The tilt sensor may be used to measure the tilt of PV devices such as PV panel. Scanning device 700 may also include a compass 208. The compass 208 may be configured to measure or determine the direction a PV module is facing. For example, the compass 208 may be used to measure a direction of a PV module when a tilt measurement is carried out. Determining the tilt of one or more PV panels and/or the direction that the one or more PV panels face may be useful for various applications, such as monitoring applications or mapping applications. When the tilt of the PV panels is fixed during deployment, the installer may want to measure tilt and angle while scanning the PV devices for mapping purposes. The scanned data may be uploaded to a remote monitoring device.
In some embodiments, a device such as mobile phone/tablet 710 may include some or all of the functionality described with regard to combined device 700. Combined device 700 may also include a screen, configured to display the information generated by the device. In one implementation, the screen may display information in real-time, which may allow the installer to monitor progress, and may improve scanning accuracy. Many mobile devices include ID readers such as barcode scanners or a camera, a GPS device, controller, communication methods, a clock, compass and tilt sensor. Application software may be downloaded to the mobile device to allow the different components to interact in a way that achieves the desired functions described herein with regard to mapping PV installations. The mobile device may allow the installation map to be displayed on the device's screen while scanning, and show real-time updating of the information attached to each PV device in the field, to aid the installer in determining that the information is being processed accurately and clearly.
Reference is now made to
At step 800, a mapping algorithm may be initialized by assigning random locations to each of the PV devices that are to be mapped. In one implementation, one or more of the devices may begin communicating by broadcasting an ID number, the current timestamp, and/or other information over the communication medium (such as power cables, wireless channels). For example, the ID number, timestamp, or other information may be transmitted at a predetermined amplitude. All or a portion of the devices may be able to detect the ID signals that are broadcast by the other devices. The received signal strength and/or the time it takes for the signal to propagate from one device to the next may depend on the distance and signal attenuation between the devices. In some embodiments, the devices may engage in one-way communication only, such as each device might only send messages to some or all of the other devices without being configured to receive a response from any particular device(s). In some embodiments, two or more devices may engage in two-way communication (such as Device A sends a message to Device B requesting a response, and measures the elapsed time between sending the message and receiving the response).
At step 805, the signal strength of each signal received by each device and/or the time delay between sending and receiving messages may be measured. At step 810 the signal strength and/or time delay measured at step 805 may be used to generate one or more initial estimates of pairwise distances between devices. The initial estimates may comprise error, such as error due to stochastic attenuation factors, noisy channels, and/or unexpected delays in signal propagation. In one implementation, multiple measurements may be taken and then averaged, or some other function may be applied to the measurements. In this implementation, an initial accuracy of the measurements may be improved by taking multiple measurements.
At step 815, the initial distance estimates generated at step 810 may be input to an algorithm, which may analyze the initial pairwise distance estimates and use them to generate an Estimated Layout Map (ELM). Many algorithms for this step may be considered, and in some embodiments, combinations of algorithms may offer accurate results. For example, a Least Squares (LS) problem may be formulated to create an ELM which minimizes the disparity between the pairwise estimated distances between various devices. A myriad of other methods, such as simulated annealing, Convex Optimization, Semidefinite Programming, or Multidimensional Scaling may be combined with transliteration and/or triangulation techniques to obtain an estimated layout based on the measurements.
At step 820, it may be determined whether a non-identifying map (NIM) is available. When a NIM is available, the method may proceed to step 840. At step 840, the NIM and ELM may be input to a matching algorithm which may incorporate elements of the method illustrated in
Alternatively, when no NIM is available at step 820, the algorithm may proceed to step 825. At step 825 the method may seek “anchor devices”, such as, a set of one or more specific devices which have known locations. When such anchors exist (or may be easily obtained by the installer), certain device IDs from the ELM may be matched to the known locations at step 835, and the rest of the devices may be arranged around them, with the final arrangement then output at step 850. When no anchor devices exist or may be obtained, the algorithm may use the current solution without further modification at step 830, proceed from step to step 850, and output the ELM “as is”, as a final map of the installation with ID information for each device. The method of
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
The plurality of PV strings 916a-n, which may be connected in parallel, may be coupled to the inputs of PV system grouping device 904. In some embodiments, PV system grouping device 904 may comprise a central inverter configured to convert a DC input to an AC output. The AC output may be coupled to a power grid. In some embodiments, PV system grouping device 904 may comprise one or more safety, monitoring and/or communication devices. Each of the PV devices 903 and/or the grouping device 904 may include an ID tag such as a barcode, serial number and/or memory or RFID card, that comprises identifying information.
In illustrative embodiments, it may be possible to match device IDs to physical locations on a map by utilizing various methods described herein. In some embodiments, it may be possible to match device IDs to physical locations on a map by determining which devices are coupled serially to one another (such as which devices comprise each string), determining the order of the various strings and then determining the order of the devices within each string.
Reference is now made to
At step 900, it may be determined that one or more power devices are ungrouped. For example, initially, all power devices may be ungrouped. At step 910, a power device may be selected from the ungrouped power devices. The power device may be selected randomly. For example, an optimizer, such as an optimizer coupled to a power generation source, may be selected. In one implementation, all or portions of step 910 may be performed by an inverter. At step 920, the power device selected at 910 may be instructed to decrease or increase an output voltage of the power device. For example, a message may be sent to the power device, via PLC, wirelessly, or via other communications methods, to increase or decrease the output voltage of the power device.
At step 930, the method may wait for power devices, such as ungrouped power devices, to report operating points. For example, the power devices may send telemetries based on a schedule or at various intervals. At step 940, operating points received from power devices, such as ungrouped power devices may be recorded. The operating points may be responsive to the increase or decrease in output voltage that was requested at step 920.
At step 950, one or more devices that do not report a change in voltage may be grouped with the power device selected at step 910. For example, devices that do not report a change in voltage greater than a threshold change in voltage may be grouped with the selected power device. The threshold may be preset or predetermined, or determined based on received operating points.
At step 960, it may be determined whether there are one or more ungrouped devices. When there are one or more ungrouped devices, the method may return to step 910 and select one of the one or more ungrouped devices. Otherwise, when at step 960 it is determined that all devices have been grouped, the method may proceed to step 970. At step 970, the grouping may be considered complete, and the division of devices into groups may be output.
As an example of the method described in
Reference is now made to
PV devices may have integrated receivers, transmitters, or transceivers 260 in each device, which may allow transmitting or receiving an RF signal on the PV conductors to determine the order of the PC devices within the string of PV panels. A transceiver signal may be fed to communication module 230 for interpreting a PLC communication, measuring a signal parameter, and/or the like. The wavelength of the signal may be shorter than the length of the conductors in PV systems, and the impedance components along the way may respond by limiting transmission at some frequencies across the conductors and nodes. Devices connected at various nodes along the string (node devices) along the string may be a power device such as a PV device, a PV power device, an inverter, an optimizer, a junction box, a combiner box, a bypass diode circuit, a direct-current (DC) to alternating-current (AC) power inverter, a DC to DC power converter, a micro-inverter, a photovoltaic panel circuit, a connector embedded circuit, or other energy management devices, where the device may comprise a signal receiver and/or transmitter and a serial impedance modification circuit as in the drawings. For example, any one or more of the above power devices may comprise an impedance modifying circuit on one or more of the output connectors of the power device.
Devices 104a-k, such as PV device 104, may further incorporate a PLC filter 280, ground (GND) switch 290, and/or the like. PLC filter 280 may be a wave trap filter, a band stop filter, a notch filter, and/or the like, and attenuate the PLC communication signal during propagation on the power device string. When the PLC filter is activated, GND switch 290 may be closed so that a return loop is created through the ground switch. In this manner, the first power device in the series may be identified, then PLC filter 280 is disconnected and GND switch 290 is opened for the first power device, and then process continued down the string until the order of the power devices in the string is determined.
The electrical signal may also be sent from one power device to an adjacent power device, and the phase may be measured. For example, when the wavelength is set to a value that is four times the string length, and the phase of the signal is adjusted and referenced so that the first power device is at zero phase, then the other power devices in the string may have a monotonically increasing or decreasing phase value, and thus the order of the power devices along the string may be determined by the phase values. For example, 20 power devices are connected with a 2-meter conductor between power devices (40 meters total), and the electrical signal is initiated by the first power device with a wavelength of 50 meters (1.5 MHz), whereby each power device may see an increasing phase of 14.4 degrees. For example, the first power device may measure a 14.4-degree phase shift, the second power device may measure a 28.8-degree phase shift, and the like. For example, for a string of n power devices, each with a distance of xi between them (where i denotes the index of the PV device) and a signal wavelength of λi, the signal phase that will develop between device i−1 and device i is 360*xi/λi degrees. So the formula for the phase at each device is: pi=Σk=0i360*xk/λk
When one of the node devices transmits an electric signal along the string of serially connected devices, the signal strength at each node may be measured and the measured value may be analyzed to determine the order of the devices along the string. For example, by setting one of the node devices to have a different impedance compared to the others, it may be determined which of the nodes are proximal to the node with the different impedance and which are distal. By iteratively changing the impedance of one node device after the other (such as changing and reverting impedances), the measured values may be analyzed to determine the order of the devices. Thus, based on the determined order of the devices, when one of the devices has a malfunction or needs maintenance, a notification may include the location of the device along the string, thereby assisting the repair/maintenance of one or more of the devices.
For example, a power device at the end of the string may transmit the signal and the power devices further down the string may record measurements of the signal. As another example, a power device at the middle of the string sends a signal on one or more of the output connectors of that power device, and the other devices on the portion of the string connected to that power device record measurements of the signal. The measurements may be sent to a central processor, such as a processor of one of the devices for analyzing to determine the order of the power devices on the string.
When two or more parallel string strings are connected to a common power device, such as an inverter, and the end power device sends the signal to an output connector, the devices on all the parallel strings may respond and send back the measured values. To separate measured values from each string, the processor may use the groups of power devices that have been classified by strings using the methods described herein. For example, the inverter may simultaneously detect the order of power devices on multiple parallel strings by segregating the measurement values according to the string they belong to.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
The impedance adjusting circuit of the power devices may be used to identify the neighboring power devices using a peer-to-peer type handshaking technique. For example, an electrical signal is transmitted from one power device, and the other power devices dynamically change their impedance (such as changing and reverting the impedance) until it is determined which of the other power devices in neighboring to the transmitting device. For example, a PLC communication module is used to communicate an electrical signal between two of the power devices, and the other power devices sequentially and/or alternately implement an impedance change using their impedance adjusting circuit, such as a high impedance, and the power devices that caused a communication error between the two communicating power devices are determined to be ordered in the serial string in between the two communicating power devices. By changing the selected two communicating power devices and repeating the determination of the intermediate power devices between them, the order of multiple power devices in each of the multiple parallel strings may be determined.
The transmitting of electrical signals may be performed simultaneously between multiple devices, such as each device transmitting at a slightly different frequency (such as between a 10 Hz to 100 MHz frequency difference), and the resulting recorded signal values at each power device may be used (such as after applying a Fourier-transform) to simultaneously determine the relative signal strength received at each power device and thus the order of the power devices. In some aspects, not all of the power devices need to record the signal and it may be sufficient to determine the order of all power devices from a subset of power devices that record the signals.
The impedance used for PLC communication may be adjusted to prevent effective PLC communication between power devices and thereby determine the order of power devices, the string of a power device in parallel strings, and/or the like. For example, when a power device in one string changes its impedance such that the PLC communication in that string is no longer possible (such as where the power devices creates a large series impedance rendering PLC communications ineffective due to significant signal attenuation by the large series impedance), the other power devices of that string may not be able to effectively communicate with a central power device and the power devices belonging to that string are determined. For example, commanding another power device to adjust impedance that is not from the first string may result in the power devices in the second string from not communicating effectively with the central power device. For example, by repeating this technique, the power devices may be categorized into strings.
A switch in each power device may connect the PLC communication loop to ground, and an impedance filter in each power device may prevent the electrical PLC signal form passing to the next power device in the string. By applying all of the impedance filters, setting the switch to connect the power device PLC communication loop to ground in one power device, and selectively setting the switch to connect the power device PLC communication loop to ground in another power device, the adjacent power device in the string may be located.
For example, under normal operating conditions in a solar power generation system, a PLC communication may be passed between power devices using the solar power connectors, which form a loop, such as a string of power devices connected at both ends to a central power device, such as an inverter. In a normal operating mode, the loop is not connected to ground. During a system installation, when the power devices are connected in a serial string to each other but no power is produced by the system, the central power device may command power devices to set a filter that prevents the PLC communication from passing along the loop. The central power device may then sequentially command each power device in turn to connect to ground, and when a PLC communication signal is received at the central power device, the power device that sent the signal may be the first power device in the string. The central power device may then command sequentially another power device to connect to ground, and when a communication link is established determine that the power device last connected is the second power device in the string. Similarly, the central power device may iteratively determine the order of the power devices in the string accordingly.
Reference is now made to
appear nanoseconds (ns) later than the ripple caused by the closer variable impedance.
At other distances, the timing may change, such as from 1 meter to 100 meters, corresponding to approximately 3 to 300 ns transit time. The signal frequency, conductor length, node impedances, and/or the like may determine (at least in part) the signal response characteristics of the power device network. When multiple transceivers and/or receivers may monitor the signals on the network the ordering of the devices on a serial network may be determined, as well as other parameters such as the node impedances, the electrical conductor lengths, and/or the like. High-quality digital or analog sensors may be able to detect time differences at this resolution. For example, when transceiver 115 commands device 104b to vary its impedance, it may detect a ripple appearing on the reflected waveform after 200 ns. When transceiver 115 commands device 104a to vary its impedance, and it detects a ripple appearing on the reflecting waveform after 210 ns, it may determine that device 104a is 1.5 in further than device 104b. By iteratively sending similar commands to each device in the system, the transceiver unit may be able to determine the relative distances of each PV device, and in conjunction with grouping the devices into strings and/or rows (using methods such as the illustrative embodiments shown in
A signal transceiver or transmitter at a device that is electrically connected to the PV string may transmit a signal, such as a radiofrequency (RF) pulse. As the signal travels along the PV string, such as along a transmission line, the signal may be attenuated by each power device or power converter along the PV string (such as according to the impedances at each device). When the power devices measure the signal that reaches them, and transmit the signal values to a central processor, the recorded signals may be compared to determine the order of the power converters along the PV string. For example, each power converter may have a small impedance that attenuates the signal by 10%, and the signals recorded at each power converter may be compared to determine the location of each converter along the PV string.
To detect the transmitted signal at each PV power device, the signal reaching each power device is recorded by a receiver located in the power device. The power devices may have a constant impedance, or a multiple impedance switching circuit that may configure one or more output conductor of the power device to a different impedance state, such as a low impedance state, a high impedance state, a short circuit state, an open circuit state, a mid-impedance, and/or the like. For example, an impedance switching circuit may configure one of the output conductors to an impedance of zero ohms (a short circuit), 1 ohm, 2 ohms, 5 ohms, 7 ohms, 10 ohms, 15 ohms, between 0.001 ohm and 5,000 ohms, between 10 ohms and 1000 ohms, between 50 ohms and 500 ohms, less than 5,000 ohms, and/or the like. Here, as elsewhere in the description, ranges may be combined to form larger ranges.
Performing signal transmissions and recording of a signal at each power device, when the impedance configurations of the devices are changed, allows detecting (such as determining) the order of the power devices. For example, when all impedances are the same and a leakage impedance from each panel to ground allows ordering the power devices by signal strength, signal power, signal frequencies, and/or the like. For example, the leakage path through the chassis and parasitic capacitance may change the signal path flow and thus the recorded signal amplitude at each power device is proportional to the order of the power devices in the string.
For example, when a first power device is providing a low impedance (such as a short circuit) and the others are providing high impedance, and the device providing a low impedance is switched from one device to another until the order is determined. For example, when one power device is providing a high impedance and the others are providing a low impedance, and the device with a short circuit is switched among the devices in the string until the order is determined.
The receiver may be part of a transceiver, and each power device performs a transmission and recording of the transmitted signals. For example, each power device transmits a slightly different signal, such as different in phase, frequency, signal shape, signal harmonic content, and/or the like. The signal propagation in the serial conductor may be between 5 and 50 nano-seconds (ns) from one power device to the next, or from the transceiver to the power device, depending on the length of conductor between the two nodes. For example, the distance is 4.5 meters and the signal propagates from one of the two nodes to the other of the two nodes within 15 ns. In this manner, the order of the power devices in the string may be detected.
A signal change may be detected differentially, such as by comparing signal attenuation between two or more states. For example, a signal is measured at each power device during a first impedance configuration among the devices, and after one or more devices change the impedance, the signal is measured again, and the difference between the measured values allows determining the order of the devices at least in part.
For example, one power converter has a high impedance and the other converters have a low impedance, and the power converters between the transceiver and the high impedance converter may record a high signal and the ones on the other side may have a low signal. By changing the impedance of each power converter one at a time, it may be possible to determine the order of the power converters. Similarly, when all power converters except one have a middle to high impedance, the signals are recorded at each converter, and the low impedance converter is changed (such as reverting to the previous impedance) until the order of the power converters is determined by comparing the recorded signals.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
The second configuration is close to a short circuit or a resistance of zero. By sequentially modifying only one of the power devices to a low impedance, maintaining the other power devices at a high impedance may allow detecting the location of each PV panel in the string.
The frequency of the transmitted signal and the impedance changes at each device may be set so that the results of the signal measurement values at each node may be used to determine the order of the power devices in the string. For example, a spread spectrum frequency sweep signal may detect aspects of the PV panel serial order. For example, a signal with a frequency of between 1 KHz and 10 MHz may be used. For example, a signal with a frequency of between 50 KHz and 50 MHz may be used. For example, a signal is used that has a frequency of 5 KHz, 10 KHz, 15 KHz, 20 KHz, 25 KHz, 40 KHz, 50 KHz, 100 KHz, 200 KHz, 500 KHz, 1 MHz, 5 MHz, 10 MHz, 20 MHz, 50 MHz, 100 MHz, 200 MHz, or the like. For example, a signal is used that has a very low frequency (VLF), a low frequency (LF), a medium frequency (MF), a high frequency (HF), or a very high frequency (VHF).
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
The method of
At step 1325, one of the untested devices is selected. For example, an untested device may be selected randomly at step 1325. At step 1330, the device selected at step 1325 may be commanded to vary its variable impedance. For example, the device may be commanded to vary its variable impedance at a determined frequency, such as a high frequency. At step 1335, a transceiver may transmit a voltage pulse over the PV string. At step 1340, the transceiver may receive the reflected wave, record and/or time the response, and save the received or determined data to memory at step 1345. At step 1350, the selected device may be removed from the pool of “untested” devices, and may be commanded, for example, by the transceiver, to stop varying its output. At step 1355, the transceiver may check or determine when there are devices in the string which are untested. When there are untested devices, the method may return to step 1325, and another power device may be selected. When it is determined, at step 1355, that all power devices have been tested (that is, no untested devices remain), the method may proceed to step 1360. At step 1360 the transceiver (or a master control unit or other system which receives data from the transceiver) may analyze the saved reflected waveforms and time samples, determine (as explained previously) which devices are closer than others, and estimate the distances between devices.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
PV device ID tags may be used for several purposes. In some embodiments, the ID tags may be used to create a map of the PV installation including the locations of specific devices in the installation. In some embodiments, the tags may be used to authenticate PV devices and ensure that approved devices are used in the installation, for example, by using an authentication protocol. In some embodiments, the protocol may be carried out by circuits and/or devices comprised in the upper part of the junction box. In some embodiments, the ID tag may be communicated to an external management device, and an authentication protocol may be carried out between components included in the lower portion, the upper portion and an external device or management unit.
Reference is now made to
At step 160, initial grouping possibilities may be considered. For example, each power device may be considered to be “possibly paired” to each other power device in the system. In some embodiments, more limiting initial possibilities may be considered based on prior knowledge. For example, it may be known that two power devices are not serially coupled to one another, and they may be initially considered “not paired.” In some embodiments, a counter may be optionally set to track the number of iterations the method has run. At step 161, the method may receive current measurements from two or more power devices at substantially the same time.
At step 162, some of the current measurements may be compared to one another. For example, when Device A and Device B are considered “possibly paired” at step 162 of the method, the current measurements of Device A and Device B, IA and IB, respectively, may be compared to each other. When the current measurements are not substantially the same, the estimated relationship between Device A and Device B may be changed to “not paired.” In some embodiments, more than one instance of substantially different currents may be required to change an estimated relationship to “not paired.” For example, Device A and Device B may be considered “possibly paired” until three pairs of substantially different current measurements have been reported. In some embodiments, the determination of whether currents are substantially the same is based on an absolute current difference. For example, when |IA_IB|<ϵ for an appropriate E (such as 10 mA, or 100 mA, or 1 A), then IA and IB might be considered “substantially the same.” In some embodiments, the determination of whether currents are substantially the same is based on a relative current difference. For example, when
for an appropriate α (such as 0.01, or 0,03, or 0.1) then IA and IB might be considered substantially the same. In some embodiments, multiple criteria may be used to determine when two currents are substantially the same.
By comparing pairs of current measurements to each other as detailed above, it may be determined which devices are unlikely to be serially coupled to one another. In some embodiments, the method may compare current measurements of each pair of power devices considered “possibly paired,” and based on the result of the comparison, the method may change the relationship between the pair of power devices to “not paired.” In some embodiments, the method may compare only a portion of the current measurements to one another. In some embodiments, some or all the current measurements selected for comparison may be chosen at random.
At step 163, the method determines when a stop condition has been reached. In some embodiments, a stop condition may be reached when a certain number of iterations have been completed. The number of iterations which trigger the stop condition may be fixed (such as 10, 50, or 100), or may depend on the number of power devices in the system (such as N/10, N/2 or √{square root over (N)} for a system containing power devices). In some embodiments, the stop condition may be triggered when a certain number of iterations have not changed the relationship between any two power devices. For example, when three method iterations have not changed the relationship between any two devices to “not paired,” the stop condition may be reached. In some embodiments, the stop condition may be reached when each power device is considered “possibly paired” to no more than a certain number of other devices. For example, a stop condition may be reached when each power device is considered “possibly paired” to no more than twenty devices, or forty devices, or sixty devices. In some embodiments, a stop condition is reached based on a combination of criteria. For example, a stop condition may be reached only when three method iterations have not changed the relationship between any two devices to “not paired,” and additionally, each power device is considered “possibly paired” to no more than fifty devices.
When the method determines that the stop condition has not been reached, at step 165 the iteration counter may be incremented, and the method may return to step 161. When the method determines that the stop condition has been reached, the method may continue to step 164, and for each Power Device X, output the group of power devices that are considered “possibly paired” to Power Device X (such as the “potential group” of Power Device X).
Reference is now made to
Devices 104a-k may comprise elements similar to those previously discussed with regard to PV devices 103 and/or 104. Some elements have not been explicitly illustrated. Devices 104a-k may each include power converter 211 (such as a DC/DC or DC/AC converter) which receives input from a PV panel, battery or other form of energy generation, and produces an output. The converter may include two output terminals for serial coupling to adjacent PV devices in string 318. One output of converter 211 may further be coupled to a leakage circuit 108 at leakage terminal LT. Leakage circuit 108 may be variously configured. In an illustrative embodiment such as shown in
In some embodiments, PV device 107 may include a communication device for transmitting leakage current measurements to a management device configured to use the current measurements for appropriate calculations (not illustrated explicitly). Controller 214 may be similar to controller 220 described with regard to
Returning to string 318, in some embodiments each PV device 107 may comprise a leakage circuit similar to leakage circuit 108. Each device may include a current sensor corresponding to sensor A1, and each current sensor may sense a different current, with the magnitude each sensed current indicating a proximity to the system power bus. For example, using the numerical example indicated in
PV device 107b may sense a current of approximately
PV device 107c may sense a current of approximately
PV device 107j may sense a current of approximately
PV device 107k may sense a current of approximately
It may be observed that the closer a PV device is to the power bus, the higher the magnitude of the sensed current may be, and in some embodiments, it may be possible to estimate the relative order of the PV devices 107a . . . 107k with regard to the power bus by comparing the current magnitude sensed by each PV device.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
In some embodiments, UAV 190 may automatically read the ID tag of each of PV modules 191. In some embodiments, UAV 190 may be in proximity to each PV module at the time the PV module's ID tag is read, and use GPS device 194 to estimate the coordinates of the PV module being scanned. The method of
UAV 190 may be variously realized. For example, a drone, miniature helicopter, remote-controlled airplane or various other UAVs may be utilized.
In some embodiments, UAV 190 may comprise a thermal camera. For example, camera 197 may be a thermal camera for obtaining a thermal image of PV installation 199, and by taking multiple thermal images of PV installation 199 over time, relative locations of PV modules may be estimated for generating an ELM, using methods disclosed herein.
Reference is now made to
With reference again to
With reference yet again to
Referring back to
Reference is now made to
PV power devices coupled to PV modules 191 may be in communication with a controller carrying out method 2100 or part thereof. For example, PV power devices coupled to PV modules 191 may comprise wireless communication devices configured to communicate with communication device 196 of UAV 190.
Method 2100 may be applied to a group of PV modules without regard for interconnectivity. Method 2100 may effectively map PV modules which are electrically connected (such as modules which are part of the same PV string) and may effectively map PV modules which are not electrically connected (such as modules which are part of different PV strings).
At the start of method 2100, at step 1220, all PV modules in the group are considered “untested”. At step 1221, a controller (such as the controller carrying out method 2100 or part of method 2100) may select a PV module from the pool of untested PV modules. At step 1222, the controller reduces the electrical power drawn from the selected. PV module. For example, the controller may command a PV power device (such as a disconnect switch or an optimizer) coupled to the PV module to reduce the electrical power drawn from the PV module (such as by disconnected the PV module from a load, or by operating the PV module at an operating point which reduces the power drawn from the PV module.
After the electrical power drawn from the PV module is reduced, it may take several minutes for the temperature of the PV module to substantially rise. The controller may wait for a period of time (such as 3, 5, 10 or 20 minutes) before proceeding to step 1223.
At step 1223, the controller may control a thermal imaging device (such as camera 197) to obtain a thermal image of the group of PV modules. At step 1224, the controller may analyze the thermal image to find “hot spots”, e.g., areas in the image which indicate a higher temperature. In some embodiments, the thermal image may comprise temperature measurements which may be numerically compared. In some embodiments, the thermal image may be represented by pixels of varying colors and/or shades of gray, with the controller configured to process the image and detect areas comprising pixels which may be indicative of a higher temperature (e.g. red, or darker shades of gray).
At step 1225, the controller may estimate the relative location of a hot spot detected at step 1224. For example, the controller may determine that the group of PV modules comprises nine PV modules placed side-by-side (e.g. similar to the depiction of
In an embodiment, method 2100 may be adapted to have all PV devices initially not providing substantial power to an electrical load. The method may be adapted at step 1222 to increase the electrical power drawn from the selected PV module, at steps 1224-1225 to detect and estimate “cold spot” locations, and at step 1226 to decrease the electrical power drawn from the selected PV module.
At step 1226, the PV module selected at step 1221 is removed from the group of untested PV modules, and the power drawn from the selected PV module is increased (e.g. by commanding a disconnect switch to reconnect the PV module to an electrical load, or commanding an optimizer to operate the PV module at an increased-power operating point).
At step 1227, the controller determines if untested PV modules remain, i.e., if there are PV modules in the group which have not yet been selected at step 1221. If untested PV modules remain, the controller may loop back to step 1221. If no untested PV modules remain, the controller may proceed to step 1228.
At step 1228, the controller may aggregate the hot spot locations estimated at step 1225 over the method iterations, to produce an estimated ELM.
In an alternative embodiment, thermal images obtained at step 1223 may be saved to memory, with steps 1224-1225 carried out after the final iteration of step 1227. In other words, analysis of thermal images may be delayed until after a full set of thermal images (one per iteration through steps 1221-1227) has been obtained. In a preferred embodiment, steps 1224-1225 are carried out in the order indicated in
Method 2100 may be combined with other methods disclosed herein, for example, to increase the accuracy of ELMs and PIMs generated by methods disclosed herein. For example, method 2100 may be used to obtain an initial ELM, with the method of
In some embodiments, reference was made to “upper” and “lower” junction box portions. This language was used for ease and is not intended to be limiting. In some embodiments, the two portions may be side-by-side, and/or functional circuitry may be transferred from one junction box portion to other, in a manner that allows them to be in electrical communication when coupled to one another.
In the illustrative embodiments disclosed herein, PV modules are used to exemplify energy sources which may make use of the novel features disclosed. In some embodiments, the energy sources may include batteries, wind or hydroelectric turbines, fuel cells or other energy sources in addition to or instead of PV modules. The current routing methods and other techniques disclosed herein may be applied to alternative energy sources such as those listed above, and the mentioning of PV modules as energy sources is for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be limiting in this respect. For example, any other energy sources or combination of energy sources may be used.
It is noted that various connections are set forth between elements herein. These connections are described in general and, unless specified otherwise, may be direct or indirect; this specification is not intended to be limiting in this respect. Further, elements of one embodiment may be combined with elements from other embodiments in appropriate combinations or subcombinations.
Specific dimensions, specific materials, specific ranges, specific frequencies, specific voltages, specific impedances, and/or other specific properties and values disclosed herein are example in nature and do not limit the scope of the present disclosure. The disclosure herein of particular values and particular ranges of values for given parameters are not exclusive of other values and ranges of values that may be useful in one or more of the examples disclosed herein. Moreover, it is envisioned that any two particular values for a specific parameter stated herein may define the endpoints of a range of values that may be suitable for the given parameter (for example, the disclosure of a first value and a second value for a given parameter may be interpreted as disclosing that any value between the first and second values may also be employed for the given parameter). For example, parameter X is exemplified herein to have value A and also exemplified to have value Z, it is envisioned that parameter X may have a range of values from about A to about Z. Similarly, it is envisioned that disclosure of two or more ranges of values for a parameter (whether such ranges are nested, overlapping or distinct) subsume all possible combination of ranges for the value that might be claimed using endpoints of the disclosed ranges. For example, when parameter X is exemplified herein to have values in the range of 1-10, or 2-9, or 3-8, it is also envisioned that parameter X may have other ranges of values including 1-9, 1-8, 1-3, 1-2, 2-10, 2-8, 2-3, 3-10, and 3-9.
Parasitic leakage from the DC+ and/or DC− lines of a power device to ground may be dominated by the leakage from the power device over other sources. For example, the device leakage may be approximately 250 pf (e.g., from MOSFET spreaders to the power device chassis) and solar panel leakage to enclosure may be approximately 100 pf. The PV string power devices' impedance, such as from switch bodies, inductors, capacitors, and/or leakage capacitances, may be modified using switches configured to tune the impedance to a mapping signal frequency, such as using switches that connect capacitors and inductors in series or parallel. For example, the switches may adjust the impedance incrementally until a best match is found to the tuning signal. The signal frequency may be tuned or adjusted to the devices' impedances, such as an adjustable frequency transmitter searching for an optimal frequency based on a fixed set of impedance changing components being connected. A spread spectrum signal injection may be used to send a plurality of signal frequencies to the power devices. Each power device may collect and record the attenuation during the frequency changes, send the recorded signal back to the central processor, and the central processor may analyze the signal strength at each frequency to determine the correct order of power devices along the string. Corresponding signal receivers at each power device may be tuned to a fixed signal frequency or be broadband receivers for receiving signals at multiple frequencies.
A high frequency (HF) signal (e.g., 140 kHz) may be injected to one side of the PV string conductor, and an amplitude reduction during the signal propagation along the PV string may be observed. A processor may determine the power devices' order within the PV string based on the injected signal being gradually attenuated by each device along the string. The device leakage may be between 50 and 500 pf, and the solar panel leakage may be between 20 and 350 pf. Depending on the leakage values of a specific installation, the HF signal frequency may be between 20 kHz and 500 kHz, where a higher frequency of this range allows more attenuation between adjacent devices, but also may cause devices further down the string to reach saturation and for the signal strength to become flat. Furthermore, as the signal may enter the PV string from both the DC+ and DC− sides of the string, and the signal and leakages are relative to ground, the signal injected at DC+ may also reach the DC− side of the string. This may result in a monotonically decreasing signal strengths at each device up to a certain point in the string, and then the signal strengths may increase due to the signal arriving at the device from the DC− side. The signal may be configured such that the leakage impedances may optimally attenuate the signal strength along the entire string.
Prior to injecting a signal at one end of the PV string, the other end of the string may be grounded to form a closed loop to ground. To obtain better signal attenuation along the PV string, a large impedance may be serially connected between the DC+ or DC−, on the opposite side from the PV string, and past the signal injection points and ground connection point. For example, a 150 kHz signal may be injected (with respect to ground) on the DC+ end of the PV string conductor. The signal may be injected from the DC+ end of the string and the DC− end of the string may be shorted to ground, or vice versa. Signal strengths at each PV panel along the string are measured, for example signal strength at the power devices along the string, such as junction boxes, power converters, optimizers, micro-inverters, or the like, associated with each PV panel. A serial inductance may be added in series to the DC− conductor, after the ground connection, such as an inductor of 0.1 mH to 10 mH. The serial impedance may help limit the amount of signal that reaches the opposite end of the string, limiting the “bathtub curve” and improving the accuracy of the mapping. Using a higher signal frequency may provide better attenuation from the power devices, but may also reach saturation quicker. To overcome the saturation, the side of the PV string used for signal injection may be reversed, for example the signal is injected from the DC− end, a 1 mH inductor is serially coupled to the DC+ end of the string, and the DC+ end is shorted to ground. The reverse injection may be especially suitable for long strings.
The serial inductance may saturate at power generation currents through the string, for example, a serial inductance of 1 mH may saturate at currents through the PV string higher than 0.2 A, such as during normal operation (e.g. after the mapping is completed). The power device receiver may switch to the tuned frequency of 140 kHz during the mapping and when the mapping is complete return to a normal communication frequency, such as 60 kHz or the like. Each of the power devices may receive a reduced signal strength in proportion to the power device's position along the string from the injected signal. After mapping, such as after a predefined time limit, each power device may transmit the received signal strength value back to a central processor or power device.
The central processor may determine the order based on the received signal strength measurements at each solar panel. The mapping may be verified or confirmed by repeating the mapping at a slightly different frequency, impedance values at each device, or both. By comparing the mapping order between two or more different mapping measurements, it may be determined that the mapping is accurate, or that there may be different leakage from some of the devices. A spread spectrum signal may allow collecting multiple signal frequencies at once and comparing the order determined at each frequency may help confirm the solar panel order. For example, sending a signal at a fixed frequency, and adjusting impedances during different mapping tests to different impedance values for each test may confirm that the results of the solar panel order are correct. When the order at different frequencies or different device impedance levels is different, the power device or solar leakages may be different, and adjusting the power devices to different impedance values may help determine and confirm the correct order of panels along the string.
The present application is a continuation in part of U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 16/217,679, filed Dec. 12, 2018, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Determining an Order of Power Devices in Power Generation Systems,” which is a continuation in part of U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/447,981, filed Mar. 2, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,061,957, issued Aug. 28, 2018, entitled “Methods for Mapping Power Generation Installations.” The present application claims priority to U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 16/217,679, filed Dec. 12, 2018, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Determining an Order of Power Devices in Power Generation Systems,” U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/447,981, filed Mar. 2, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,061,957, issued Aug. 28, 2018, entitled “Methods for Mapping Power Generation Installations,” U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/303,017, filed Mar. 3, 2016, entitled “Methods for Mapping Power Generation Installations,” and U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/381,298, filed Aug. 30, 2016, entitled “Methods for Mapping Power Generation Installations,” which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2586804 | Fluke | Feb 1952 | A |
2758219 | Miller | Aug 1956 | A |
2958171 | Deckers | Nov 1960 | A |
3369210 | Manickella | Feb 1968 | A |
3740652 | Burgener | Jun 1973 | A |
3958136 | Schroeder | May 1976 | A |
4101816 | Shepter | Jul 1978 | A |
4129823 | van der Pool et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4146785 | Neale | Mar 1979 | A |
4161771 | Bates | Jul 1979 | A |
4257087 | Cuk | Mar 1981 | A |
4296461 | Mallory et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4346341 | Blackburn et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4452867 | Conforti | Jun 1984 | A |
4481654 | Daniels et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4533986 | Jones | Aug 1985 | A |
4549254 | Kissel | Oct 1985 | A |
4554515 | Burson et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4611090 | Catella et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4623753 | Feldman et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4639844 | Gallios et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4641042 | Miyazawa | Feb 1987 | A |
4644458 | Harafuji et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4652770 | Kumano | Mar 1987 | A |
4685040 | Steigerwald et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4686617 | Colton | Aug 1987 | A |
4706181 | Mercer | Nov 1987 | A |
4720667 | Lee et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4720668 | Lee et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4746879 | Ma et al. | May 1988 | A |
4783728 | Hoffman | Nov 1988 | A |
4797803 | Carroll | Jan 1989 | A |
RE33057 | Clegg et al. | Sep 1989 | E |
4864213 | Kido | Sep 1989 | A |
4868379 | West | Sep 1989 | A |
4888063 | Powell | Dec 1989 | A |
4888702 | Gerken et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4899246 | Tripodi | Feb 1990 | A |
4899269 | Rouzies | Feb 1990 | A |
4906859 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4910518 | Kim et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4978870 | Chen et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4987360 | Thompson | Jan 1991 | A |
5045988 | Glitter et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5081558 | Mahler | Jan 1992 | A |
5097196 | Schoneman | Mar 1992 | A |
5191519 | Kawakami | Mar 1993 | A |
5210519 | Moore | May 1993 | A |
5280232 | Kohl et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5287261 | Ehsani | Feb 1994 | A |
5289361 | Vinciarelli | Feb 1994 | A |
5327071 | Frederick et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345375 | Mohan | Sep 1994 | A |
5391235 | Inoue | Feb 1995 | A |
5402060 | Erisman | Mar 1995 | A |
5428286 | Kha | Jun 1995 | A |
5446645 | Shirahama et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5460546 | Kunishi et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469919 | Carisella | Nov 1995 | A |
5493154 | Smith et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497289 | Sugishima et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5517378 | Asplund et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530335 | Decker et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5548504 | Takehara | Aug 1996 | A |
5563780 | Goad | Oct 1996 | A |
5604430 | Decker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5616913 | Litterst | Apr 1997 | A |
5644219 | Kurokawa | Jul 1997 | A |
5654740 | Schulha | Aug 1997 | A |
5659465 | Flack et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5686766 | Tamechika | Nov 1997 | A |
5696439 | Presti et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5726505 | Yamada et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734259 | Sisson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5773963 | Blanc et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777515 | Kimura | Jul 1998 | A |
5777858 | Rodulfo | Jul 1998 | A |
5780092 | Agbo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5798631 | Spee et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801519 | Midya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804894 | Leeson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821734 | Faulk | Oct 1998 | A |
5822186 | Bull et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838148 | Kurokami et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5869956 | Nagao et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873738 | Shimada et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886882 | Rodulfo | Mar 1999 | A |
5886890 | Ishida et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892354 | Nagao et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902347 | Backman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905645 | Cross | May 1999 | A |
5917722 | Singh | Jun 1999 | A |
5919314 | Kim | Jul 1999 | A |
5923158 | Kurokami et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930128 | Dent | Jul 1999 | A |
5945806 | Faulk | Aug 1999 | A |
5955885 | Kurokami et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961739 | Osborne | Oct 1999 | A |
5963010 | Hayashi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982253 | Perrin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986909 | Hammond et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002290 | Avery et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002603 | Carver | Dec 1999 | A |
6031736 | Takehara et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037720 | Wong et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046919 | Madenokouji et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078511 | Fasullo et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082122 | Madenokouji et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087738 | Hammond | Jul 2000 | A |
6091329 | Newman | Jul 2000 | A |
6111391 | Cullen | Aug 2000 | A |
6163086 | Choo | Dec 2000 | A |
6166527 | Dwelley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6219623 | Wills | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256234 | Keeth et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259234 | Perol | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268559 | Yamawaki | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274804 | Psyk et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285572 | Onizuka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292379 | Edevold et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297621 | Hui et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304065 | Wittenbreder | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339538 | Handleman | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344612 | Kuwahara et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369462 | Siri | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396170 | Laufenberg et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6441597 | Lethellier | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448489 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6465931 | Knowles et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6483203 | McCormack | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493246 | Suzui et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6507176 | Wittenbreder, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512444 | Morris, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6531848 | Chitsazan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545211 | Mimura | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548205 | Leung et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6587051 | Takehara et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6590793 | Nagao et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590794 | Carter | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593521 | Kobayashi | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600100 | Ho et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6608468 | Nagase | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611441 | Kurokami et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6628011 | Droppo et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633824 | Dollar, II | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636431 | Seki et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650560 | MacDonald et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653549 | Matsushita et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655987 | Higashikozono et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678174 | Suzui et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690590 | Stamenic et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693781 | Kroker | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6731136 | Knee | May 2004 | B2 |
6738692 | Schienbein et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744643 | Luo et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750391 | Bower | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765315 | Hammerstrom et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768047 | Chang et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788033 | Vinciarelli | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6788146 | Forejt et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795318 | Haas et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801442 | Suzui et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810339 | Wills | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6828503 | Yoshikawa et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6828901 | Birchfield et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850074 | Adams et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6882131 | Takada et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6914418 | Sung | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919714 | Delepaut | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927955 | Suzui et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933627 | Wilhelm | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936995 | Kapsokavathis et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950323 | Achleitner et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963147 | Kurokami et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984967 | Notman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984970 | Capel | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030597 | Bruno et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038430 | Itabashi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042195 | Tsunetsugu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046531 | Zocchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053506 | Alonso et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7072194 | Nayar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079406 | Kurokami et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087332 | Harris | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090509 | Gilliland et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7099169 | West et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7281141 | Elkayam et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7348802 | Kasanyal et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7443052 | Wendt et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7456523 | Kobayashi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7485987 | Mori et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7495419 | Ju | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7504811 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7596008 | Iwata et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7615981 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7709727 | Roehrig et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7719140 | Ledenev et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7759575 | Jones et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763807 | Richter | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772716 | Shaver, II et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782031 | Qiu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783389 | Yamada et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787273 | Lu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7804282 | Bertele | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808125 | Sachdeva et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7812701 | Lee et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824189 | Lauermann et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7868599 | Rahman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880334 | Evans et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893346 | Nachamkin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7906007 | Gibson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919952 | Fahrenbruch | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7925552 | Tarbell et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7944191 | Xu | May 2011 | B2 |
7945413 | Krein | May 2011 | B2 |
7948221 | Watanabe et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7952897 | Nocentini et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7960650 | Richter et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8003885 | Richter et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8018748 | Leonard | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8035249 | Shaver, II et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049363 | McLean et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8058747 | Avrutsky et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067855 | Mumtaz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8089780 | Mochikawa et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8097818 | Gerull et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8102144 | Capp et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8138914 | Wong et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8139335 | Quardt et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8139382 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8169252 | Fahrenbruch et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8184460 | O'Brien et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8204709 | Presher, Jr. et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8248804 | Han et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8289183 | Foss | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8289742 | Adest et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294451 | Hasenfus | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8310102 | Raju | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8324921 | Adest et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8378656 | de Rooij et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8379418 | Falk | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8395366 | Uno | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8410359 | Richter | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8410950 | Takehara et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8415937 | Hester | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8427009 | Shaver, II et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8436592 | Salton | May 2013 | B2 |
8531055 | Adest et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8570017 | Perichon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8618692 | Adest et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8670255 | Gong et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8710351 | Robbins | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8791598 | Jain | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8809699 | Funk | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8816535 | Adest et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8823342 | Williams | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8835748 | Frolov et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8859884 | Dunton et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8878563 | Robbins | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8963375 | DeGraaff | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8972765 | Krolak et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9291696 | Adest et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20010000957 | Birchfield et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010023703 | Kondo et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034982 | Nagao et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020017900 | Takeda et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020044473 | Toyomura et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047693 | Chang | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056089 | Houston | May 2002 | A1 |
20020134567 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020148497 | Sasaoka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020190696 | Darshan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025594 | Akiyama et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030058593 | Bertele et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058662 | Baudelot et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066076 | Minahan | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075211 | Makita et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080741 | LeRow et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090246 | Shenai et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030107352 | Downer et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030111103 | Bower et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030116154 | Butler et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030214274 | Lethellier | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040004402 | Kippley | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040041548 | Perry | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056642 | Nebrigic et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061527 | Knee | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040125618 | De Rooij et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140719 | Vulih et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150410 | Schoepf et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169499 | Huang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201279 | Templeton | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201933 | Blanc | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230343 | Zalesski | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246226 | Moon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263183 | Naidu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002214 | Deng et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005785 | Poss et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017697 | Capel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050057214 | Matan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057215 | Matan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068820 | Radosevich et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050099138 | Wilhelm | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103376 | Matsushita et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050105224 | Nishi | May 2005 | A1 |
20050162018 | Realmuto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172995 | Rohrig et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194937 | Jacobs | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050218876 | Nino | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050226017 | Kotsopoulos et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050275979 | Xu | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281064 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287402 | Maly et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001406 | Matan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017327 | Siri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060034106 | Johnson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038692 | Schnetker | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043792 | Hjort et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060043942 | Cohen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053447 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066349 | Murakami | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068239 | Norimatsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077046 | Endo | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108979 | Daniel et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109009 | Banke et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113843 | Beveridge | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060113979 | Ishigaki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060118162 | Saelzer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132102 | Harvey | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149396 | Templeton | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060162772 | Presher et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163946 | Henne et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171182 | Siri et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174939 | Matan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176716 | Balakrishnan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060185727 | Matan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060192540 | Balakrishnan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060208660 | Shinmura et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227577 | Horiuchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227578 | Datta et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235717 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237058 | McClintock et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266408 | Horne et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267515 | Burke et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070013349 | Bassett | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029636 | Kanemaru et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030068 | Motonobu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044837 | Simburger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075711 | Blanc et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070081364 | Andreycak | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085523 | Scoones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089778 | Horne et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070115635 | Low et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133241 | Mumtaz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159866 | Siri | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070164750 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165347 | Wendt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205778 | Fabbro et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227574 | Cart | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070236187 | Wai et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070241720 | Sakamoto et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247135 | Koga | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247877 | Kwon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070273339 | Haines | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273342 | Kataoka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070290636 | Beck et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080024098 | Hojo | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080088184 | Tung et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097655 | Hadar et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080142071 | Dorn et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143188 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143462 | Belisle et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080179949 | Besser et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186004 | Williams | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080192519 | Iwata et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218152 | Bo | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236647 | Gibson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080236648 | Klein et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238195 | Shaver et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246460 | Smith | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246463 | Sinton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252273 | Woo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080297963 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080298608 | Wilcox | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090014050 | Haaf | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090014057 | Croft et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090015071 | Iwata et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090066399 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090073726 | Babcock | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078300 | Ang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084570 | Gherardini et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090097172 | Bremicker et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102440 | Coles | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121549 | Leonard | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141522 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160258 | Allen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090179500 | Ragonese et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090184746 | Fahrenbruch | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190275 | Gilmore et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090217965 | Dougal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090224817 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242011 | Proisy et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090243547 | Andelfinger | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090295225 | Asplund et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325003 | Aberle et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001587 | Casey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020576 | Falk | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026736 | Plut | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038907 | Hunt et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052735 | Burkland et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060000 | Scholte-Wassink | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071742 | de Rooij et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085670 | Palaniswami et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124087 | Falk | May 2010 | A1 |
20100126550 | Foss | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127571 | Hadar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132761 | Echizenya et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100139743 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141041 | Bose et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147362 | King et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154858 | Jain | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100176773 | Capel | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100181957 | Goeltner | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195361 | Stem | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206378 | Erickson, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214808 | Rodriguez | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217551 | Goff et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241375 | Kumar | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244575 | Coccia et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246223 | Xuan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264736 | Mumtaz et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286836 | Shaver, II et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100288327 | Lisi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110006743 | Fabbro | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031816 | Buthker et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037600 | Takehara et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043172 | Dearn | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110056533 | Kuan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061705 | Croft et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110068633 | Quardt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079263 | Avrutsky | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110080147 | Schoenlinner et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110108087 | Croft et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115295 | Moon et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125431 | Adest et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110198935 | Hinman et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110232714 | Bhavaraju et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110240100 | Lu et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254372 | Haines et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260866 | Avrutsky et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267859 | Chapman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273017 | Borup et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110278955 | Signorelli et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110290317 | Naumovitz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298288 | Cho et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120019966 | DeBoer | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026769 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033392 | Golubovic et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120043818 | Stratakos et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120048325 | Matsuo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120049627 | Matsuo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120049801 | Chang | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063177 | Garrity | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120080943 | Phadke | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120081009 | Shteynberg et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120081933 | Garrity | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120081934 | Garrity et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120081937 | Phadke | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120087159 | Chapman et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120091810 | Aiello et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120091817 | Seymour et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120098344 | Bergveld et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120104863 | Yuan | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113554 | Paoletti et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133372 | Tsai et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138123 | Newdoll et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120139343 | Adest et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120146583 | Gaul et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161526 | Huang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169124 | Nakashima et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120187769 | Spannhake et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194003 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120217973 | Avrutsky | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120274145 | Taddeo | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120274264 | Mun et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280571 | Hargis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130002335 | DeGraaff | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038124 | Newdoll et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130049710 | Kraft et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130063119 | Lubomirsky | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082724 | Noda et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130321013 | Pisklak et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342389 | Cojocaru et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346054 | Mumtaz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140097808 | Clark et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140111220 | Andersen | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140167715 | Wu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140265629 | Gazit et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140265638 | Orr et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150188415 | Abido et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012225199 | Oct 2013 | AU |
2071396 | Feb 1991 | CN |
1236213 | Nov 1999 | CN |
1309451 | Aug 2001 | CN |
1122905 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1474492 | Feb 2004 | CN |
1523726 | Aug 2004 | CN |
1588773 | Mar 2005 | CN |
2706955 | Jun 2005 | CN |
1838191 | Sep 2006 | CN |
1902809 | Jan 2007 | CN |
1933315 | Mar 2007 | CN |
2891438 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101107712 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101128974 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101136129 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101180781 | May 2008 | CN |
101257221 | Sep 2008 | CN |
201167381 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101488271 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101521459 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101523230 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101672252 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101779291 | Jul 2010 | CN |
101847939 | Sep 2010 | CN |
201601477 | Oct 2010 | CN |
201623478 | Nov 2010 | CN |
101902051 | Dec 2010 | CN |
201663167 | Dec 2010 | CN |
101939660 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101951011 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101951190 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101953051 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101976855 | Feb 2011 | CN |
101976952 | Feb 2011 | CN |
101980409 | Feb 2011 | CN |
102089883 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102148584 | Aug 2011 | CN |
201926948 | Aug 2011 | CN |
201956938 | Aug 2011 | CN |
202034903 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102273039 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102362550 | Feb 2012 | CN |
202178274 | Mar 2012 | CN |
102474112 | May 2012 | CN |
202871823 | Apr 2013 | CN |
1161639 | Jan 1964 | DE |
4041672 | Jun 1992 | DE |
19737286 | Mar 1999 | DE |
10219956 | Apr 2003 | DE |
102004053942 | May 2006 | DE |
20 2005 020161 | Nov 2006 | DE |
102005036153 | Dec 2006 | DE |
102005030907 | Jan 2007 | DE |
202007002077 | Apr 2008 | DE |
102006060815 | Jun 2008 | DE |
102007051134 | Mar 2009 | DE |
202008012345 | Mar 2009 | DE |
102007037130 | Apr 2009 | DE |
202009007318 | Aug 2009 | DE |
102008057874 | May 2010 | DE |
102009051186 | May 2010 | DE |
102009022569 | Dec 2010 | DE |
102010023549 | Dec 2011 | DE |
419093 | Mar 1991 | EP |
04168612 | Mar 1991 | EP |
420295 | Apr 1991 | EP |
604777 | Jul 1994 | EP |
756178 | Jan 1997 | EP |
827254 | Mar 1998 | EP |
1039361 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1039621 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1047179 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1330009 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1503490 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1531542 | May 2005 | EP |
1531545 | May 2005 | EP |
1642355 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1657557 | May 2006 | EP |
1657797 | May 2006 | EP |
1887675 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1914857 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2048679 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2130286 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2135296 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2234237 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2249457 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2256819 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2315328 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2386122 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2393178 | Dec 2011 | EP |
3214758 | Sep 2017 | EP |
2249147 | Mar 2006 | ES |
2249149 | Mar 2006 | ES |
2128017 | Apr 1984 | GB |
2476508 | Jun 2011 | GB |
2480015 | Dec 2011 | GB |
61065320 | Apr 1986 | JP |
8009557 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H10308523 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11041832 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11103538 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11206038 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11289891 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11318042 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000174307 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000339044 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001189476 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002300735 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003124492 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003134667 | May 2003 | JP |
2003282916 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004194500 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004260944 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004-334704 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005192314 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2006278755 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007058845 | Mar 2007 | JP |
4174227H | Oct 2008 | JP |
2011-249790 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012178535 | Sep 2012 | JP |
101073143 | Oct 2011 | KR |
497326 | Aug 2002 | TW |
200913291 | Mar 2009 | TW |
1993013587 | Jul 1993 | WO |
9525374 | Sep 1995 | WO |
9534121 | Dec 1995 | WO |
1996013093 | May 1996 | WO |
1998023021 | May 1998 | WO |
0000839 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0021178 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0113502 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0231517 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2003050938 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003071655 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2003098703 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004023278 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004090993 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004098261 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004107543 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005076444 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005076445 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005119278 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006005125 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006007198 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006074561 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006078685 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006130520 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007006564 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007020419 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007048421 | May 2007 | WO |
2007073951 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007084196 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007090476 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007113358 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008008528 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008046370 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008119034 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008121266 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008132551 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008132553 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009011780 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009026602 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009046533 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009051870 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009059877 | May 2009 | WO |
2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009136358 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010002960 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010003941 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010020385 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010071855 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010065043 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010065388 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010072717 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010078303 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010080672 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010094012 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010118503 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010132369 | Nov 2010 | WO |
20100134057 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011011711 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011017721 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011019936 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011023732 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011044641 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011059067 | May 2011 | WO |
2011074025 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011076707 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011089607 | Jul 2011 | WO |
1998023021 | Jul 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report Under Sections 17 and 18(3), GB1020862.7, dated Jun. 16, 2011. |
QT Technical Application Papers, “ABB Circuit-Breakers for Direct current Applications”, ABB SAGE S.p.A., An ABB Group Company, L.V. Breakers, Via Baioni, 35, 24123 Bergamo-Italy, Tel.: +39 035.395.111—Telefax: +39 035.395306-433, Sep. 2007. |
Woyte, et al., “Mains Monitoring and Protection in a European Context”, 17th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Munich, Germany, Oct. 22-26, 2001, Achim, Woyte, et al., pp. 1-4. |
“Implementation and testing of Anti-Islanding Algorithms for IEEE 929-2000 Compliance of Single Phase Photovoltaic Inverters”, Raymond M. Hudson, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002. Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE, May 19-24, 2002. |
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note 9016, IGBT Basics 1, by K.S. Oh Feb. 1, 2001. |
“Disconnect Switches in Photovoltaic Applications”, ABB, Inc., Low Voltage Control Products & Systems, 1206 Hatton Road, Wichita Falls, TX 86302, Phone 888-385-1221, 940-397-7000, Fax: 940-397-7085, 1SXU301197B0201, Nov. 2009. |
Walker, “A DC Circuit Breaker for an Electric Vehicle Battery Pack”, Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference and IEAust Electric Energy Conference, Sep. 26-29, 1999. |
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB1018872.0 dated Apr. 15, 2011, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Opinion of International Patent Application PCT/2009/051221, dated Oct. 19, 2009. |
International Search Report and Opinion of International Patent Application PCT/2009/051222, dated Oct. 7, 2009. |
Communication in EP07874025.5 dated Aug. 17, 2011. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2008/055095 dated Jun. 8, 2010, with Written Opinion. |
ISR for PCT/IB2008/055095 dated Apr. 30, 2009. |
ISR for PCT/IL07/01064 dated Mar. 25, 2008. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2007/004584 dated Jun. 10, 2009, with Written Opinion. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2007/004591 dated Jul. 13, 2010, with Written Opinion. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2007/004643 dated Jun. 10, 2009, with Written Opinion. |
Written Opinion for PCT/IB2008/055092 submitted with IPRP dated Jun. 8, 2010. |
IPRP for PCT/US2008/085754 dated Jun. 8, 2010, with Written Opinion dated Jan. 21, 2009. |
IPRP for PCT/US2008/085755 dated Jun. 8, 2010, with Written Opinion dated Jan. 20, 2009. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2009/051221 dated Sep. 28, 2010, with Written Opinion. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2009/051222 dated Sep. 28, 2010, with Written Opinion. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2009/051831 dated Nov. 9, 2010, with Written Opinion. |
IPRP for PCT/US2008/085736 dated Jun. 7, 2011, with Written Opinion. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2010/052287 dated Nov. 22, 2011, with Written Opinion. |
ISR for PCT/IB2010/052413 dated Sep. 7, 2010. |
UK Intellectual Property Office, Application No. GB1109618.7, Patents Act 1977, Examination Report Under Section 18(3), dated Sep. 16, 2011. |
UK Intellectual Property Office, Patents Act 1977: Patents Rules Notification of Grant: Patent Serial No. GB2480015, dated Nov. 29, 2011. |
Walker, et al. “PV String Per-Module Maximum Power Point Enabling Converters”, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering the University of Queensland, Sep. 28, 2003. |
Walker, “Cascaded DC-DC Converter Connection of Photovoltaic Modules”, 33rd Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. PESC 2002. Conference Proceedings. Cairns, Queensland, Australia, Jun. 23-27, 2002; [Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference], New York, NY: IEEE US, vol. 1, Jun. 23, 2002, pp. 24-29, XP010596060 ISBN: 978-0-7803-7262-7, figure 1. |
Baggio, “Quasi-ZVS Activity Auxiliary Commutation Circuit for Two Switches Forward Converter”, 32nd Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. PESC 2001. Conference Proceedings. Vancouver, Canada, Jun. 17-21, 2001; [Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference] New York, NY: IEEE, US. |
Ilic, “Interleaved Zero-Current-Transition Buck Converter”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 43, No. 6, Nov. 1, 2007, pp. 1619-1627, XP011197477 ISSN: 0093-9994, pp. 1619-1922. |
Lee: “Novel Zero-Voltage-Transition and Zero-Current-Transition Pulse-Width-Modulation Converters”, Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1997, PESC '97, Record, 28th Annual IEEE St. Louis, MO, USA, Jun. 22-27, 1997, New York, NY, USA IEEE, US, vol. 1, Jun. 22, 1997, pp. 233-239, XP010241553, ISBN: 978-0-7803-3840-1, pp. 233-236. |
Sakamoto, “Switched Snubber for High-Frequency Switching Converters”, Electronics & Communications in Japan, Part 1—Communications, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, US, vol. 76, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1993, pp. 30-38, XP000403018 ISSN: 8756-6621, pp. 30-35. |
Duarte, “A Family of ZVX-PWM Active-Clamping DC-to-DC Converters: Synthesis, Analysis and Experimentation”, Telecommunications Energy Conference, 1995, INTELEC '95, 17th International The Hague, Netherlands, Oct. 29-Nov. 1, 1995, New York, NY, US, IEEE, US, Oct. 29, 1995, pp. 502-509, XP010161283 ISBN: 978-0-7803-2750-4 p. 503-504. |
IPRP for PCT/IL2007/001064 dated Mar. 17, 2009, with Written Opinion dated Mar. 25, 2008. |
IPRP for PCT/IB2007/004586 dated Jun. 10, 2009, with Written Opinion. |
Gao, et al., “Parallel-Connected Solar PV System to Address Partial and Rapidly Fluctuating Shadow Conditions”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, No. 5, May 2009, pp. 1548-1556. |
IPRP PCT/IB2007/004610—date of issue Jun. 10, 2009. |
Extended European Search Report—EP12176089.6—dated Nov. 8, 2012. |
Gwon-Jong Yu et al: “Maximum power point tracking with temperature compensation of photovoltaic for air conditioning system with fuzzy controller”, May 13, 1996; May 13, 1996-May 17, 1996, May 13, 1996 ( May 13, 1996), pp. 1429-1432, XP010208423. |
Extended European Search Report—EP12177067.1—dated Dec. 7, 2012. |
GB Combined Search and Examination Report—GB1200423.0—dated Apr. 30, 2012. |
GB Combined Search and Examination Report—GB1201499.9—dated May 28, 2012. |
GB Combined Search and Examination Report—GB1201506.1—dated May 22, 2012. |
“Study of Energy Storage Capacitor Reduction for Single Phase PWM Rectifier”, Ruxi Wang et al., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Feb. 2009. |
“Multilevel Inverters: A Survey of Topologies, Controls, and Applications”, José Rodriguez et al., IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, No. 4, Aug. 2002. |
Extended European Search Report—EP 08878650.4—dated Mar. 28, 2013. |
Satcon Solstice—Satcon Solstice 100 kW System Solution Sheet—2010. |
John Xue, “PV Module Series String Balancing Converters”, University of Queensland—School of Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, Nov. 6, 2002. |
Robert W Erickson, “Future of Power Electronics for Photovoltaics”, IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Feb. 2009. |
GB Combined Search and Examination Report—GB1203763.6—dated Jun. 25, 2012. |
Mohammad Reza Amini et al., “Quasi Resonant DC Link Inverter with a Simple Auxiliary Circuit”, Journal of Power Electronics, vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 2011. |
Khairy Fathy et al., “A Novel Quasi-Resonant Snubber-Assisted ZCS-PWM DC-DC Converter with High Frequency Link”, Journal of Power Electronics, vol. 7, No. 2, Apr. 2007. |
Cheng K.W.E., “New Generation of Switched Capacitor Converters”, Department of Electrical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Horn, Hong Kong, Power Electronics Conference, 1998, PESC 98. |
1999—Per Karlsson, “Quasi Resonant DC Link Converters—Analysis and Design for a Battery Charger Application”, Universitetstryckeriet, Lund University, 1999, ISBN 91-88934-14-4; Added to Lund University Publications on Jun. 4, 2012. |
Hsiao Sung-Hsin et al., “ZCS Switched-Capacitor Bidirectional Converters with Secondary Output Power Amplifier for Biomedical Applications”, Power Electronics Conference (IPEC) Jun. 21, 2010. |
Yuang-Shung Lee et al.,“A Novel QR ZCS Switched-Capacitor Bidirectional Converter”, IEEE, 2007. |
Antti Tolvanen et al., “Seminar on Solar Simulation Standards and Measurement Principles”, May 9, 2006 Hawaii. |
J.A. Eikelboom and M.J. Jansen, “Characterisation of PV Modules of New Generations—Results of tests and simulations”, Jun. 2000. |
Yeong-Chau Kuo et al., “Novel Maximum-Power-Point-Tracking Controller for Photovoltaic Energy Conversion System”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 48, No. 3, Jun. 2001. |
C. Liu et al., “Advanced Algorithm for MPPT Control of Photovoltaic Systems”, Canadian Solar Buildings Conference, Montreal, Aug. 20-24, 2004. |
Chihchiang Hua and Chihming Shen, “Study of Maximum Power Tracking Techniques and Control of DC/DC Converters for Photovoltaic Power System”, IEEE 1998. |
Tore Skjellnes et al., “Load sharing for parallel inverters without communication”, Nordic Workshop in Power and Industrial Electronics, Aug. 12-14, 2002. |
Giorgio Spiazzi at el., “A New Family of Zero-Current-Switching Variable Frequency dc-dc Converters”, IEEE 2000. |
Nayar, C.V., M. Ashari and W.W.L Keerthiphala, “A Grid Interactive Photovoltaic Uninterruptible Power Supply System Using Battery Storage and a Back up Diesel Generator”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 15, No. 3, Sep. 2000, pp. 348?353. |
Ph. Strauss et al., “AC coupled PV Hybrid systems and Micro Grids-state of the art and future trends”, 3rd World conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Osaka, Japan May 11-18, 2003. |
Nayar, C.V., abstract, Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2000. IEEE, 2000, pp. 1280-1282 vol. 2. |
D. C. Martins et al., “Analysis of Utility Interactive Photovoltaic Generation System using a Single Power Static Inverter”, Asian J. Energy Environ., vol. 5, Issue 2, (2004), pp. 115-137. |
Rafael C. Beltrame et al., “Decentralized Multi String PV System With Integrated ZVT Cell”, Congresso Brasileiro de Automática / Sep. 12-16, 2010, Bonito—MS. |
Sergio Busquets-Monge et al., “Multilevel Diode-clamped Converter for Photovoltaic Generators With Independent Voltage Control of Each Solar Array”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, No. 7, Jul. 2008. |
Soeren Baekhoej Kjaer et al., “A Review of Single-Phase Grid-Connected Inverters for Photovoltaic Modules”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2005. |
Office Action—JP 2011-539491—dated Mar. 26, 2013. |
Supplementary European Search Report—EP08857456—dated Dec. 6, 2013. |
Extended European Search Report—EP14151651.8—dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
Iyomori H et al: “Three-phase bridge power block module type auxiliary resonant AC link snubber-assisted soft switching inverter for distributed AC power supply”, INTELEC 2003. 25th. International Telecommunications Energy Conference. Yokohama, Japan, Oct. 19-23, 2003; Tokyo, IEICE, JP, Oct. 23, 2003 (Oct. 23, 2003), pp. 650-656, XP031895550, ISBN: 978-4-88552-196-6. |
Yuqing Tang: “High Power Inverter EMI characterization and Improvement Using Auxiliary Resonant Snubber Inverter”, Dec. 17, 1998 (Dec. 17, 1998), XP055055241, Blacksburg, Virginia Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http:ijscholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-012299-165108/unrestricted/THESIS. PDF, [retrieved on Mar. 5, 2013]. |
Yoshida M et al: “Actual efficiency and electromagnetic noises evaluations of a single inductor resonant AC link snubber-assisted three-phase soft-switching inverter”, Intelec 2003. 25th. International Telecommunications Energy Conference Yokohama, Japan, Oct. 19-23, 2003; Tokyo, IEICE, JP, Oct. 23, 2003 (Oct. 23, 2003), pp. 721-726, XP031895560, ISBN: 978-4-88552-196-6. |
Third party observation—EP07874025.5—dated Aug. 6, 2011. |
Extended European Search Report—EP 13152967.9—dated Aug. 28, 2014. |
Extended European Search Report—EP 14159696—dated Jun. 20, 2014. |
Gow Ja A et al: “A Modular DC-DC Converter and Maximum Power Tracking Controller for Medium to Large Scale Photovoltaic Generating Plant” 8<SUP>th </SUP> European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. Lausaane, CH, Sep. 7-9, 1999, EPE. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Brussls: EPE Association, BE, vol. Conf. 8, Sep. 7, 1999, pp. 1-8, XP000883026. |
Matsuo H et al: “Novel Solar Cell Power Supply System Using the Multiple-input DC-DC Converter” 20<SUP>th4 SUP> International telecommunications Energy Conference. Intelec '98 San Francisco, CA, Oct. 4-8, 1998, Intelec International Telecommunications Energy Conference, New York, NY: IEEE, US, Oct. 4, 1998, pp. 797-802, XP000896384. |
European Patent Application No. 08845104.2, Extended Search Report, dated Jul. 31, 2014. |
European Patent Application No. 11772811.3, Extended Search Report, dated Dec. 15, 2014. |
European Search Report—EP App. 14159457.2—dated Jun. 12, 2015. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion—EP Appl. 12150819.6—dated Jul. 6, 2015. |
Alonso, O. et al. “Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Converter for Grid Connected Photovoltaic Generators With Independent Maximum Power Point Tracking of Each Solar Array.” IEEE 34th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference. vol. 2, Jun. 15, 2003. |
Alonso, et al., “Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Converter for Grid Connected Photovoltaic Generators with Independent Maximum Power Point Tracking of Each Solar Array”, 2003 IEEE 34th, Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Acapulco, Mexico, Jun. 15-19, 2003, pp. 731-735, vol. 2. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201280006369.2—dated Aug. 4, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201210253614.1—dated Aug. 18, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report, EP Application 04753488.8, dated Apr. 29, 2015. |
International Search Report from PCT/US04/16668, form PCT/ISA/220, filing date May 27, 2004. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 13/785,857, dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
Partial Extended European Search Report, EP Application 04753488.8, dated Feb. 2, 2015. |
The International Search Report (Form PCT /ISA/220) Issued in corresponding international application No. PCT/US04/16668, filed May 27, 2004. |
International Search Report—PCT/US2004/016668, form PCT/ISA/220—filed May 27, 2004—dated Jan. 19, 2005. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority—PCT/US2004/016668, form PCT/ISA/220—filing date May 27, 2004—dated Jan. 19, 2005. |
Extended European Search Report—EP Appl. 04753488.8—dated Apr. 29, 2015. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report—EP Appl. 04753488.8—dated Feb. 2, 2015. |
U.S. Office Action—U.S. Appl. 13/785,857—dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
European Office Action—EP Appl. 09725443.7—dated Aug. 18, 2015. |
Test NPL _ Not Real. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201110349734.7—dated Oct. 13, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201210007491.3—dated Nov. 23, 2015. |
European Office Action—EP Appl. 12176089.6—dated Dec. 16, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201310035223.7—dated Dec. 29, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Application 201210334311.2—dated Jan. 20, 2016. |
European Search Report—EP Appl. 13800859.4—dated Feb. 15, 2016. |
Chinese Office Action—CN App. 201310035221.8—dated Mar. 1, 2016. |
PCT/2008/058473 International Preliminary Report, 6 pages, dated Nov. 2, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, WO 2010080672, dated Aug. 19, 2010. |
PCT/US2010/045352 International Search Report and Written Opinion; 12 pages; dated Oct. 26, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 6, 2009,. In counteprart PCT/US2008/008451, 13 pages. |
European Search Report: dated Jan. 10, 2013 in corresponding EP application No. 09838022.3, 7 pages. |
D. Ton and W. Bower; Summary Report of the DOE High-Tech Inverter Workshop; Jan. 2005 |
First Action Interview Pre-Interview Communication from U.S. Appl. No. 13/174,495 dated Jun. 18, 2014, 7 pgs. |
Johnson et al., “Arc-fault detector algorithm evaluation method utilizing prerecorded arcing signatures”, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Jun. 2012. |
Philippe Welter, et al. “Electricity at 32 kHz,” Photon International, The Photovoltaic Magazine, Http://www.photon-magazine.com/archiv/articles.aspx?criteria=4&HeftNr=0807&Title=Elec . . . printed May 27, 2011). |
PCT/US2009/069582 Int. Search Report—dated Aug. 19, 2010. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201210007491.3—dated Apr. 25, 2016. |
CN Office Action—CN Appl. 201310004123.8—dated May 5, 2016. |
Law et al, “Design and Analysis of Switched-Capacitor-Based Step-Up Resonant Converters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 52, No. 5, published May 2005. |
CN Office Action—CN Appl. 201310066888.4—dated May 30, 2016. |
European Search Report—EP Appl. 13152966.1—dated Jul. 21, 2016. |
European Search Report—EP Appl. 12183811.4—dated Aug. 4, 2016. |
European Notice of Opposition—EP Patent 2374190—dated Jul. 19, 2016. |
“Es werde Dunkelheit. Freischaltung von Solarmodulen im Brandfall”—“Let there be Darkness: Quality control of Solar Modules in Case of Fire”; Photon, May 2005, 75-77, ISSN 1430-5348, English translation provided. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201380029450.7—dated Jul. 28, 2016. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201310035221.8—dated Aug. 11, 2016. |
Zhou, Wilson and Theo Phillips—“Industry's First 4-Switch Buck-Boost Controller Achieves Highest Efficiency Using a Single Inducutor—Design Note 369”—Linear Technology Corporation—www.linear.com—2005. |
“Micropower Synchronous Buck-Boost DC/DC Converter”—Linear Technology Corporation—www.linear.com/LTC3440-2001. |
Caricchi, F. et al—20 kW Water-Cooled Prototype of a Buck-Boost Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Topology for Electrical Vehicle Motor Drives—University of Rome—IEEE 1995—pp. 887-892. |
Roy, Arunanshu et al—“Battery Charger using Bicycle”—EE318 Electronic Design Lab Project Report, EE Dept, IIT Bombay, Apr. 2006. |
Jun. 20-25, 2004—Viswanathan, K. et al—Dual-Mode Control of Cascade Buck-Boost PFC Converter—35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference—Aachen, Germany, 2004. |
Zhang, Pei et al.—“Hardware Design Experiences in ZebraNet”—Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University—SenSys '04, Nov. 3-5, 2004. |
“High Efficiency, Synchronous, 4-Switch Buck-Boost Controller”—Linear Technology Corporation—www.linear.com/LTC3780—2005. |
Chomsuwan, Komkrit et al. “Photovoltaic Grid-Connected Inverter Using Two-Switch Buck-Boost Converter”—Department of Electrical Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand—IEEE—2002. |
Midya, Pallab et al.—“Buck or Boost Tracking Power Converter”—IEEE Power Electronics Letters, vol. 2, No. 4—Dec. 2004. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201510111948.9—dated Sep. 14, 2016. |
Chinese Office Action—CN Appl. 201310066888.4—dated Nov. 2, 2016. |
“Power-Switching Converters—the Principle, Simulation and Design of the Switching Power (the Second Edition)”, Ang, Oliva, et al., translated by Xu Dehong, et al., China Machine Press, Aug. 2010, earlier publication 2005. |
European Notice of Opposition—EP Patent 2092625—dated Nov. 29, 2016. |
Mar. 8, 2003—Vishay Siliconix “Si 7884DP—n-Channel 40-V (D-S) MOSFET” (2003). |
Chinese Office Action—CN 201510423458.2—dated Jan. 3, 2017 (english translation provided). |
Chinese Office Action—CN 201410098154.9—dated Mar. 3, 2017 (english translation provided). |
European Search Report—EP Appl. 13150911.9—dated Apr. 7, 2017. |
Chinese Office Action and Search Report—CN 201510578586.4—dated Apr. 19, 2017. |
Jul. 7, 2017—European Search Report—EP 17158978.1. |
Howard et al, “Relaxation on a Mesh: a Formalism for Generalized Localization.” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2001). Wailea, Hawaii, Oct. 2001. |
Ciobotaru, et al., Control of single-stage single-phase PV inverter, Aug. 7, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2007/004591 dated Jul. 5, 2010. |
European Communication for EP07873361.5 dated Jul. 12, 2010. |
European Communication for EP07874022.2 dated Oct. 18, 2010. |
European Communication for EP07875148.4 dated Oct. 18, 2010. |
Chen, et al., “A New Low-Stress Buck-Boost Converter for Universal-Input PFC Applications”, IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Feb. 2001, Colorado Power Electronics Center Publications. |
Chen, et al., “Buck-Boost PWM Converters Having Two Independently Controlled Switches”, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jun. 2001, Colorado Power Electronics Center Publications. |
Esram, et al., “Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 22, No. 2, Jun. 2007, pp. 439-449. |
Walker, et al., “Photovoltaic DC-DC Module Integrated Converter for Novel Cascaded and Bypass Grid Connection Topologies-Design and Optimisation”, 37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jun. 18-22, 2006, Jeju, Korea. |
Geoffrey R. Walker Affidavit re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,307, submitted in an IDS for U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,271 on Mar. 9, 2010. |
Geoffrey R. Walker Affidavit re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,271, submitted in an IDS for U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,271 on Mar. 9, 2010. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2007/004610 dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2007/004584 dated Jan. 28, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2007/004586 dated Mar. 5, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2007/004643 dated Jan. 30, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/085736 dated Jan. 28, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/085754 dated Feb. 9, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/085755 dated Feb. 3, 2009. |
Kajihara, et al., “Model of Photovoltaic Cell Circuits Under Partial Shading”, 2005 IEEE, pp. 866-870. |
Knaupp, et al., “Operation of a 10 KW PV Façade with 100 W AC Photovoltaic Modules”, 1996 IEEE, 25th PVSC, May 13-17, 1996, pp. 1235-1238, Washington, DC. |
Myrzik, et al., “String and Module Integrated Inverters for Single-Phase Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems—A Review”, Power Tech Conference Proceedings, 2003 IEEE Bologna, Jun. 23-26, 2003, p. 8, vol. 2. |
Chen, et al., “Predictive Digital Current Programmed Control”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 18, Issue 1, Jan. 2003. |
Wallace, et al., “DSP Controlled Buck/Boost Power Factor Correction for Telephony Rectifiers”, Telecommunications Energy Conference 2001, INTELEC 2001, Twenty-Third International, Oct. 18, 2001, pp. 132-138. |
Alonso, “A New Distributed Converter Interface for PV Panels”, 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 6-10, 2005, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2288-2291. |
Alonso, “Experimental Results of Intelligent PV Module for Grid-Connected PV Systems”, 21st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Sep. 4-8, 2006, Dresden, Germany, pp. 2297-2300. |
Enslin, “Integrated Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking Converter”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 44, No. 6, Dec. 1997, pp. 769-773. |
Sep. 7-9, 1999—Lindgren, “Topology for Decentralised Solar Energy Inverters with a Low Voltage AC-Bus”, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Electrical Power Engineering, EPE '99—Lausanne. |
Nikraz, “Digital Control of a Voltage Source Inverter in a Photovoltaic Applications”, 2004 35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Aachen, Germany, 2004, pp. 3266-3271. |
Orduz, “Evaluation Test Results of a New Distributed MPPT Converter”, 22nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Sep. 3-7, 2007, Milan, Italy. |
Palma, “A Modular Fuel Cell, Modular DC-DC Converter Concept for High Performance and Enhanced Reliability”, IEEE 2007, pp. 2633-2638. |
Sep. 16-19, 1996—Quaschning, “Cost Effectiveness of Shadow Tolerant Photovoltaic Systems”, Berlin University of Technology, Institute of Electrical Energy Technology, Renewable Energy Section. EuroSun '96, pp. 819-824. |
Roman, “Intelligent PV Module for Grid-Connected PV Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 52, No. 4, Aug. 2006, pp. 1066-1073. |
Roman, “Power Line Communications in Modular PV Systems”, 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 6-10, 2005, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2249-2252. |
Uriarte, “Energy Integrated Management System for PV Applications”, 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 6-10, 2005, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2292-2295. |
Walker, “Cascaded DC-DC Converter Connection of Photovoltaic Modules”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul. 2004, pp. 1130-1139. |
Oct. 3-7, 1999—Matsui, et al., “A New Maximum Photovoltaic Power Tracking Control Scheme Based on Power Equilibrium at DC Link”, IEEE, 1999, pp. 804-809. |
Hou, et al., Application of Adaptive Algorithm of Solar Cell Battery Charger, Apr. 2004. |
Stamenic, et al., “Maximum Power Point Tracking for Building Integrated Photovoltaic Ventilation Systems”, 2000. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2008/055092 dated Jun. 8, 2010. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2008/055092 dated Sep. 8, 2009. |
International Search Report and Opinion of International Patent Application WO2009136358 (PCT/IB2009/051831), dated Sep. 16, 2009. |
Informal Comments to the International Search Report dated Dec. 3, 2009. |
PCT/IB2010/052287 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 2, 2010. |
UK Intellectual Property office, Combined Search and Examination Report for GB1100450.4 under Sections 17 and 18 (3), dated Jul. 14, 2011. |
Jain, et al., “A Single-Stage Grid Connected Inverter Topology for Solar PV Systems with Maximum Power Point Tracking”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 5, Sep. 2007, pp. 1928-1940. |
Lynch, et al., “Flexible DER Utility Interface System: Final Report”, Sep. 2004-May 2006, Northern Power Systems, Inc., Waitsfield, Vermont B. Kroposki, et al., National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado Technical Report NREL/TP-560-39876, Aug. 2006. |
Schimpf, et al., “Grid Connected Converters for Photovoltaic, State of the Art, Ideas for improvement of Transformerless Inverters”, NORPIE/2008, Nordic Workshop on Power and Industrial Electronics, Jun. 9-11, 2008. |
Sandia Report SAND96-2797 I UC-1290 Unlimited Release, Printed Dec. 1996, “Photovoltaic Power Systems and The National Electrical Code: Suggested Practices”, by John Wiles, Southwest Technology Development Institute New Mexico State University Las Cruces, NM. |
Feb. 10, 2020—EP Search Report—EP 19215309.6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200279963 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62381298 | Aug 2016 | US | |
62303017 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16217679 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 16784980 | US | |
Parent | 15447981 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 16217679 | US |