The present invention relates to a method for downhole communication and an apparatus for remote actuation of a downhole tool. In particular, but not exclusively, the invention relates to a method for downhole communication with, and an apparatus for actuation of, tools in an oil or gas well.
Radio frequency identification (hereinafter RFID) provides a useful method for communicating with downhole tools and devices. One arrangement for remote operation of circulation subs using RFID is described in GB Patent No 2420133B, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The most commonly used method of transmitting data using RFID makes use of a signal modulation system known as amplitude shift keying (hereinafter ASK). ASK is a form of signal modulation that represents digital data as variations in the amplitude of a carrier wave having a constant frequency and phase. The overwhelming majority of RFID systems and commercially available RFID tags use ASK as it is generally the cheapest, most well known and readily available system for transmitting data using RFID.
In view of the ease of availability of RFID tags programmed to transmit signals using ASK as well as the generally accepted view that ASK functions well in a metal environment, RFID communication using ASK is typically considered the preferred method for downhole communication in oil and gas wells.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of downhole communication comprising the steps of:—
“Downhole” as used herein is intended to refer to a volume defined by a wellbore, such as an open hole or a cased/completed wellbore.
The method can include programming the tag and the reader to communicate data by at least one of the following means: transitions between discrete frequencies; use of specific discrete frequencies; and length of time in which a carrier wave emits a specific frequency in preference to at least one other frequency.
Step (a) can include programming the tag with a radio frequency identification signal in the form of a carrier wave having at least two different frequencies. Step (a) can include programming the tag with a radio frequency identification signal in the form of a carrier wave having two different frequencies.
The method of communication can include programming the tag to emit a radio frequency identification signal in the form of a carrier wave having two discrete frequencies, wherein the two discrete frequencies transmit binary information to the downhole reader.
The method can include selecting a carrier wave having at least two discrete frequencies that are in the frequency range between 10 kilohertz and 200 kilohertz.
More preferably, the at least two frequencies forming the signal can be selected in the frequency range between 100 and 150 kilohertz. Even more preferably, the frequencies of the carrier wave forming the signal can be selected in the frequency range 120 to 140 kilohertz. Most preferably, the frequencies can be selected in the frequency range 124 to 136 kilohertz.
Step (a) can include selecting a carrier wave having two discrete frequencies: 124 kilohertz; and 134 kilohertz.
The method can include spacing the discrete frequencies by a minimum quantity. As a result, the change in the discrete frequencies of the carrier wave can be more easily identifiable by the downhole reader in a variety of downhole conditions.
For example, the minimum frequency difference between two signals can be greater than 2 kilohertz (kHz), for example, frequencies of 128 and 132 kHz, separated by 4 kHz. The minimum difference between the frequencies can be at least 5 kilohertz, for example, frequencies of 127 and 134 kHz, separated by 7 kHz. Most preferably, the minimum difference between the frequencies can be at least 8 kilohertz, for example, frequencies of 124 and 134 kHz, separated by 10 kHz. This can ensure that the at least two discrete frequencies are sufficiently distinguishable from one another by the downhole reader.
The method can also include maintaining a constant amplitude of the carrier wave.
Prior to step (b), the method can include programming the reader to transmit data to the at least one tag via a radio frequency identification signal in the form of a discrete frequency change in a carrier wave. Data transferred from the reader to the at least one tag can include operating conditions of a coupled tool or external environment.
Step (b) can include associating the reader with a conduit downhole for the passage of fluids therethrough. This step can include arranging the reader such that downhole fluids and the at least one tag can pass through a throughbore of the downhole conduit and reader.
The conduit can comprise any downhole tubing string such as a drillstring or production string. The method may further comprise the step of matching the inner diameter of the reader and the conduit such that the inner diameter of the conduit is not restricted by the reader.
Step (c) can also include running the at least one tag downhole.
The method can include circulating fluid through the conduit and the reader. The method of step (c) can include adding the at least one tag to the circulating fluid. This step can include circulating the tag through the reader
Step (c) can include charging the at least one tag as it is moved past the reader. Charging the tag can thereby cause the tag to emit the radio frequency identification signal.
The method may comprise the additional step of recovering the tag after use.
The method for downhole communication can include communicating data from the tag to the downhole reader for the purpose of actuating a downhole tool.
Prior to step (d), the method can include associating a downhole tool with the reader to enable remote actuation of the downhole tool.
The downhole tool can be selected from the group consisting of: sliding sleeves; packers; flapper valves; and other tools located in a tubing string.
The method can include locating at least two readers downhole with associated tools, the readers being individually identifiable or selectable. The tags may be selectively programmed with unique data, for example, specific discrete frequencies, such that data from each tag is capable of being received by an individual reader responsive to the specific discrete frequencies. Therefore, there may be provided several readers coupled to respective downhole tools and a plurality of tags selectively encoded with data which may be read only by a particular reader with a unique identity, for operation of a specific tool.
The reader can be an antenna. The antenna can be less then 10 meters in axial length, for example, between 5-10 meters. The antenna can be less then 5 meters in axial length, for example between 2 to 5 meters.
Alternatively and preferably, the antenna can be around 0.5 meter in axial length, for example, between 0.1 to 1 meters and most preferably, the antenna is around 14 inches (0.356 meters) in axial length.
The antenna can comprise a generally cylindrical housing and a coiled conductor within a portion of the housing, wherein the coiled conductor is separated from the portion of housing by an insulating material, and wherein the portion of the housing has a greater internal diameter than an external diameter of the coiled conductor. The insulating material can be any suitable non-conducting material such as air, glass fibre, rubber or ceramic.
The antenna can further comprise a liner, wherein the coiled conductor is wrapped around the liner, in a helical co-axial manner. Preferably, the housing and liner form a seal around the coiled conductor and insulating material. The housing can be made of steel. The liner can be non-magnetic and non-conductive to restrict eddy currents.
Since the antenna is provided for use downhole, all components comprising the antenna can be capable of withstanding the high temperatures and pressures experienced downhole.
According to a second aspect of the invention, there is also provided apparatus for actuating a downhole tool comprising:
According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a downhole tag programmed to emit a radio frequency identification signal in the form of a frequency change in a carrier wave.
The tag is preferably adapted to withstand the temperatures and pressures experienced downhole. The tag can be oil-filled to improve its collapse rating.
All optional or essential features or steps of the first aspect of the invention can be provided in conjunction with the features of the second or third aspects of the invention where appropriate.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:—
A reader in the form of an antenna is shown in
The two frequencies specified (below) in the present embodiment are optimised for an antenna having a length of around 14 inches (0.356 meters) and a diameter of around 2 inches (0.05 meters) to 4 inches (0.10 meters). A longer antenna provides improved functional results as a tag will take more time to pass through a longer antenna and hence increase the available time for the antenna to charge and read data from the tag. However, a longer antenna is significantly more expensive to manufacture, install and run downhole. Accordingly, an antenna 10 of around 14 inches (0.356 meters) in length balances the cost against the basic functional requirements.
The antenna 10 is coupled to an electronics pack (not shown) and a battery (not shown) to power the assembly prior to being included in the conduit at the surface. The electronics pack is programmed to respond to a specific carrier wave signal having two discrete frequencies.
An RFID tag 20 is shown in
The RFID tag 20 is programmed to emit a unique signal. The signal emitted by the tag is formed by a carrier wave having two discrete Radio Frequencies (RF); 124 kHz and 134 Hz. The signal transmits binary information. One of the frequencies e.g. 124 kHz represents a “0” and the other frequency e.g. 134 kHz represents a “1”.
The two frequencies of the described embodiment are optimally selected. The higher the frequency, the better the signal will carry over a longer range, but the greater the attenuation of the signal, so the harder it may be to detect. Additionally a higher frequency signal requires more energy (battery power) for its detection. Prolonging the battery life of a downhole antenna 10 is a very important consideration, since the battery housed within the antenna 10 cannot be accessed downhole and hence, when there is no further battery power, the downhole antenna 10 will cease to function, until it is removed from the wellbore and the battery replaced.
With a lower frequency signal, there is less attenuation, but the data transmission rate is slower. High data transmission rates are important because the tag 20 passes through the antenna 10 quickly and a high rate of data transmission is required for the antenna 10 to read the signal from the tag 20 before the tag 20 exits the antenna 10.
Thus, the optimum frequencies disclosed herein of 124 kHz and 134 kHz, balance the need to prolong battery life of the antenna 10 and attain the required data transmission rate and signal strength so that the signal is adequately communicated from the tag 20 to the antenna 10 as the tag 20 passes therethrough.
The antenna 10 is made up as part of a drill string and run downhole into the wellbore of a hydrocarbon well along with the drill string. The programmed RFID tag 20 is then weighted, if required, and dropped or flushed into the well with well fluid. After travelling through the inner bore of the conduit, the RFID tag 20 reaches the antenna 10. During passage of the RFID tag 20 through the throughbore of the antenna 10, the antenna 10 charges and reads data from the tag 20. The data is in binary form with both frequencies representing binary information. Data transmitted by the tag 20 is received by the antenna 10 and can then be processed by the electronics pack.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the reader can be coupled to a tool (not shown), such as a circulation sub, flapper valve, packer or the like. In this case, the electronics pack processes data received by the antenna 10 as described above and recognises a flag in the data which corresponds to an actuation instruction data code stored in the electronics pack. The electronics pack can then instruct actuation of the downhole tool.
Several tags 20 programmed with the same operating instructions can be added to the well, so that at least one of the tags 20 will reach the antenna 10 enabling operating instructions to be transmitted. Once the data is transferred, the other RFID tags 20 encoded with similar data can be ignored by the antenna 10.
The tags 20 may also carry data transmitted from the antenna 10, enabling them to be re-coded during passage through the antenna 10. The antenna 10 can emit an RF signal in the form of a carrier wave having two discrete frequencies in response to the RF signal it receives. This can re-code the tag 20 with information sent from the antenna 10. The tag 20 can then be recovered from the cuttings recovered from the annulus from the borehole. In particular, useful data such as temperature, pressure, flow rate and any other operating conditions can be transferred to the tag 20.
According to alternative embodiments of the invention, different frequencies within the frequency range 10 to 200 kHz can be selected. Again the selection of appropriate frequencies depends on factors such as length of the antenna 10 and the required data transmission rates. This method of transmitting digital information using discrete frequency changes of a carrier wave can be referred to as frequency shift keying (hereinafter FSK).
At least two discrete frequencies are required to produce the signal by the carrier wave. The amplitude of the signal is irrelevant since the reader is programmed to identify the difference in frequencies rather than the amplitude or strength of each signal.
Ideally there should be a minimum spacing between the two frequencies to allow the frequencies to be detected without the need to significantly boost the signals downhole. The minimum spacing between the frequencies is particularly important when the downhole conditions are variable, which can affect the signal strength and intensity.
It should be noted that, hitherto, FSK is generally thought not to function as efficiently as ASK for data transmission adjacent large metal bodies. However, the inventors have found that a tag passing downhole through a conduit is typically moving in the region of highest flow rate i.e. towards the centre of the conduit. Therefore the tag 20 emitting the RF signal is not immediately adjacent the metal conduit, although the reader/antenna 10 is positioned immediately adjacent the metal. Furthermore, at the time the tag 20 delivers the RF signal, it is passing through the reader/antenna 10 that has a non-conductive inner liner, rather than the metal conduit itself.
The inventors of the present invention have also realised that the optimum orientation of a tag 20 as it is passing through an antenna 10 in the direction of flow indicated by arrow 11 is as shown in
The inventors have also found the surprising result that RF signals using ASK as a data transmission method can be more difficult than FSK to detect downhole. If a tag 20 emitting signals using ASK is incorrectly located relative to the reader/antenna 10 (for example, the tag 20 is too close to the reader, too far from the reader or the tag 20 is in an incorrect orientation), the reader is not always able to consistently and reliably detect a signal. Since the temperature, pressure, flow rate, direction of flow, etc. in an oil and gas well is varied and can be unpredictable, RF signals based on ASK can be more difficult to detect downhole. As a result, ASK can be useful downhole, but surprisingly has a narrower range of downhole operating parameters than FSK.
Moreover, the inventors have found that there is greater attenuation of ASK signals relying on a change in amplitude compared with FSK that relies on a change in frequency of the carrier wave. This can lead to a poorer signal strength and quality when data is transmitted using ASK.
Modifications and improvements can be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0914650.7 | Aug 2009 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2010/051389 | 8/23/2010 | WO | 00 | 2/29/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/021053 | 2/24/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3227228 | Bannister | Jan 1966 | A |
3233674 | Leutwyler | Feb 1966 | A |
3914732 | Brumleve et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4432417 | Bowyer | Feb 1984 | A |
4617960 | More | Oct 1986 | A |
4698631 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4712613 | Nieuwstad | Dec 1987 | A |
4796699 | Upchurch | Jan 1989 | A |
4856595 | Upchurch | Aug 1989 | A |
4896722 | Upchurch | Jan 1990 | A |
4915168 | Upchurch | Apr 1990 | A |
5142128 | Perkin et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146983 | Hromas et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5203414 | Hromas et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5226494 | Rubbo et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5289372 | Guthrie et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5343963 | Bouldin et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5360967 | Perkin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5558153 | Holcombe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5579283 | Owens et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5611401 | Myers, Jr. et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5706896 | Tubel et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5893413 | Lembcke et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5991602 | Sturm | Nov 1999 | A |
6012518 | Pringle et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021095 | Tubel et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6055213 | Rubbo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6109357 | Zimmerman | Aug 2000 | A |
6244351 | Patel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6308137 | Underhill et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333699 | Zierolf | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333700 | Thomeer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343649 | Beck et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347292 | Denny et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349772 | Mullen et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6359569 | Beck et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6384738 | Carstensen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388577 | Carstensen | May 2002 | B1 |
6414905 | Owens et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443228 | Aronstam et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480811 | Denny et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6481505 | Beck et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488082 | Echols et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497280 | Beck et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6536524 | Snider | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6588505 | Beck et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597175 | Brisco | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604063 | Denny et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6624759 | Tubel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6684953 | Sonnier | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6710720 | Carstensen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6745833 | Aronstam et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759968 | Zierolf | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6760275 | Carstensen | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6776240 | Kenison et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782948 | Echols et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789619 | Carlson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802373 | Dillenbeck et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6915848 | Thomeer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6935425 | Aronstam | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6973416 | Denny et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976535 | Aronstam et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989764 | Thomeer et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7014100 | Zierolf | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025146 | King et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044229 | Tennoy et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062413 | Denny et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7063148 | Jabusch | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066256 | Dillenbeck et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7084769 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128154 | Giroux et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7159654 | Ellison et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
RE39583 | Upchurch | Apr 2007 | E |
7201231 | Chaplin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7252152 | LoGiudice et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273102 | Sheffield | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275602 | Green et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283061 | Snider et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7295491 | Carstensen | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296462 | Gregory et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7322410 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337850 | Contant | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7385523 | Thomeer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389205 | Denny et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7400263 | Snider et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7455108 | Jenkins et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7484625 | Scott et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500389 | Green et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503398 | LoGiudice et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510001 | Spring et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7543637 | Green et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562712 | Cho et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7588100 | Hamilton | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591318 | Tilghman | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7606682 | Denny et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7634942 | Green et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7665527 | Loretz | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7714741 | Snider et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7912678 | Denny et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7946356 | Koederitz et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958715 | Kinert et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963452 | Moritz | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8016037 | Bloom et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20030029611 | Owens | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030174099 | Bauer et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040239521 | Zierolf | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050115708 | Jabusch | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050230109 | Kammann et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050285645 | Hall | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050285751 | Hall | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060087448 | Den Boer et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100968 | Hall | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113803 | Hall | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060124310 | Lopez de Cardenas et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060175404 | Zierolf | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060202835 | Thibault | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060243643 | Scott | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250243 | Masino et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267770 | Sanari et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070124220 | Griggs et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070267221 | Giroux et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272411 | Lopez De Cardenas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285275 | Purkis et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080000690 | Lynde | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019216 | Leggett, III | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080041597 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080074282 | Koo | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080105427 | Hampton et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128126 | Dagenais et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080128168 | Purkis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149345 | Marya et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080245534 | Purkis | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271887 | Snider et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090027166 | Stevens | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034368 | Johnson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044937 | Purkis | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090065214 | Purkis | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090090502 | Lumbye et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114401 | Purkis | May 2009 | A1 |
20090121895 | Denny et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151939 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090208295 | Kinert et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090223663 | Snider et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090223670 | Snider | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230340 | Purkis | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090266544 | Redlinger et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272544 | Giroux et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100044034 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100089583 | Xu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100170681 | Purkis | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200243 | Purkis | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100200244 | Purkis | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110001633 | Lam | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110148603 | Denny et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110204143 | Mackenzie et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110248566 | Purkis | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120065126 | Bruser et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120206243 | Butler | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1214501 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2420133 | May 2006 | GB |
2420133 | May 2006 | GB |
9205533 | Apr 1992 | WO |
0073625 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2006046075 | May 2006 | WO |
2006051250 | May 2006 | WO |
2006082407 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006082421 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006109008 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006120466 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007125335 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008059260 | May 2008 | WO |
2009050518 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009050517 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009050518 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009098512 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009109788 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009114356 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010038072 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010086654 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010149643 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2010149644 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2012065123 | May 2012 | WO |
WO-2012065126 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fraley, Karen, et al., “RFID Technology for Downhole Well Applications,” Exploration & Production—Oil & Gas Review 2007—OTC Edition, 3 pages. |
Snider, Philip M., et al., “AADE 2009NTCE-16-04: RFID Downhole Tools and Development for the Drilling Environment,” AADE 2009 National Technical Conference & Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2009NTCE-16-04 Tech Paper, pp. 1-3. |
Runge, Paul, “Petrowell Operations Report,” Petrowell RFID Circulation Sub First Deployment for CNR International, Aug. 25, 2005, 11 pages. |
Hubertus v. Thomeer, et al. v. Snider, et al., Patent Interference No. 105,466 (SCM) (Technology Center 2600), Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Entered Nov. 21, 2006, 3 pages. |
M-1 Swaco, Company News, JPT, May 2008, 1 page. |
Ott, Stephane, “International Search Report” for PCT/GB2010/051389, as mailed May 6, 2011, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120146806 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |