1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to techniques for establishing fluid communication between a subterranean formation and a downhole tool positioned in a wellbore penetrating the subterranean formation. More particularly, the present invention relates to probes and associated techniques for drawing fluid from the formation into the downhole tool.
2. Background of the Related Art
Wellbores are drilled to locate and produce hydrocarbons. A downhole drilling tool with a bit at an end thereof is advanced into the ground to form the wellbore. As the drilling tool is advanced, a drilling mud is pumped through the drilling tool and out the drill bit to cool the drilling tool and carry away cuttings. The fluid exits the drill bit and flows back up to the surface for recirculation through the tool. The drilling mud is also used to form a mudcake to line the wellbore.
During the drilling operation, it is desirable to perform various evaluations of the formations penetrated by the wellbore. In some cases, the drilling tool may be provided with devices to test and/or sample the surrounding formation. In some cases, the drilling tool may be removed and a wireline tool may be deployed into the wellbore to test and/or sample the formation. These samples or tests may be used, for example, to locate valuable hydrocarbons.
Formation evaluation often requires that fluid from the formation be drawn into the downhole tool for testing and/or sampling. Various devices, such as probes, are extended from the downhole tool to establish fluid communication with the formation surrounding the wellbore and draw fluid into the downhole tool. A typical probe is a circular element extended from the downhole tool and positioned against the sidewall of the wellbore. A packer at the end of the probe is used to create a seal with the wall of the formation. The mudcake lining the wellbore is often useful in assisting the packer in making the seal. Once the seal is made, fluid from the formation is drawn into the downhole tool through an inlet in the probe by lowering the pressure in the downhole tool. Examples of such probes used in wireline and/or drilling tools are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,301,959; 4,860,581; 4,936,139; 6,585,045 and 6,609,568 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 2004/0000433.
Despite the advances in probe technology, there remains a need for a reliable probe that is capable of operating in extremely harsh wellbore conditions. During operation, the seal between the packer and the wellbore wall may be incomplete or lost. When a probe fails to make a sufficient seal with the wellbore wall, problems may occur, such as contamination by wellbore fluids seeping into the downhole tool through the inlet, lost pressure and other problems. Such problems may cause costly delays in the wellbore operations by requiring additional time for more testing and/or sampling. Additionally, such problems may yield false results that are erroneous and/or unusable.
There also remains a need for a probe that routinely provides an adequate seal with the formation, particularly in cases where the surface of the well is rough and the probe may not have good contact with the wellbore wall. It is desirable that such a probe be provided with mechanisms that provide additional support to the packer to assure a good seal with the wellbore wall. Moreover, it is desirable that such a probe conforms to the shape of the wellbore, distributes forces about the probe and/or reduces the likelihood of failures.
The present invention is directed at techniques for supporting a probe of a downhole tool during formation evaluation. In at least one aspect, the present invention relates to a probe for drawing fluid from a subterranean formation into a downhole tool. The downhole tool is positioned in a wellbore penetrating the subterranean formation. The downhole tool is provided with a probe body, at least one packer and a plurality of packer supports. The probe body is extendable from the downhole tool and has at least one inlet extending therethrough for receiving downhole fluids. The packer is positioned on an external end of the probe body. The packer is adapted to create a seal with the wellbore wall. The packer has an inner surface and a peripheral surface. The inner surface defines an aperture therethrough in fluid communication with the inlet(s). At least one of the plurality of at least one packer supports is an internal packer support positioned adjacent at least a portion of the inner surface of the packer and at least one of the plurality of packer supports is an external packer support positioned about at least a portion of the peripheral surface of the packer whereby at least a portion of the packer is supported as it is pressed against the wellbore wall.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a downhole tool for drawing fluid from a subterranean formation therein. The downhole tool is positionable in a wellbore penetrating the subterranean formation. The downhole tool is provided with a housing, a probe body, at least one packer and a plurality of supports. The probe body is extendable from the housing, the probe body having at least one inlet extending therethrough for receiving downhole fluids. The packer is positioned on an external end of the probe body. The packer is adapted to create a seal with the wellbore wall. The packer has an inner surface and a peripheral surface. The inner surface defines an aperture therethrough in fluid communication with the inlet(s). At least one packer support is an internal packer support positioned adjacent at least a portion of the inner surface of the packer and at least one packer support is an external packer support positioned about at least a portion of the peripheral surface of the packer whereby at least a portion of the packer is supported as it is pressed against the wellbore wall.
Finally, in another aspect, the present invention relates to a method of drawing a fluid from a subterranean formation into a downhole tool positioned in a wellbore. The method includes extending a probe from the downhole tool, the probe having a packer at an end thereof, sealingly engaging the packer with a wall of the wellbore, supporting at least a portion of the inner surface of the packer and the peripheral surface of the packer as the packer engages the wellbore wall and drawing the fluid into the probe through the aperture. The packer has an inner surface and a peripheral surface, the inner surface defining an aperture therethrough.
So that the above recited features and advantages of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Presently preferred embodiments of the invention are shown in the above-identified figures and described in detail below. In describing the preferred embodiments, like or identical reference numerals are used to identify common or similar elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features and certain views of the figures may be shown exaggerated in scale or in schematic in the interest of clarity and conciseness.
In the illustrated example, the present invention is carried by a down hole tool, such as the drilling tool 10 of
The drilling tool 10 is provided with a probe 26 for establishing fluid communication with the formation F and drawing the fluid 21 into the downhole tool as shown by the arrows. As shown in
Fluid drawn into the downhole tool using the probe 26 may be measured to determine, for example pretest and/or pressure parameters. Additionally, the downhole tool may be provided with devices, such as sample chambers, for collecting fluid samples for retrieval at the surface. Backup pistons 8 may also be provided to assist in applying force to push the drilling tool and/or probe against the wellbore wall.
The drilling tool used with the present invention may be of a variety of drilling tools, such as a Measurement-While-Drilling (MWD), Logging-While Drilling (LWD), casing drilling or other drilling system. An example of a drilling tool usable for performing various downhole tests is depicted in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/707,152 filed on Nov. 24, 2003, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The downhole drilling tool 10 may be removed from the wellbore and a wireline tool 10′ (
The downhole tool 10′ is deployable into bore hole 14 and suspended therein with a conventional wire line 18, or conductor or conventional tubing or coiled tubing, below the rig 5 as will be appreciated by one of skill in the art. The illustrated tool 10′ is provided with various modules and/or components 12, including, but not limited to, a probe 26′ for establishing fluid communication with the formation F and drawing the fluid 21 into the downhole tool as shown by the arrows. Backup pistons 8 may be provided to further thrust the downhole tool against the wellbore wall and assist the probe in engaging the wellbore wall. The tools of
While
Referring back to
An alternate view of the probe 26 is shown in
The probe body has an internal chamber 38 with a retractable piston 40 slidably positioned therein. The retractable piston 40 is selectively retractable into the probe body 35 to define a cavity 42 (
Referring back to
When the probe is extended and the packer is pressed against the wellbore wall, the packer typically deforms and flattens against the wall. However, as shown in
Internal support 48 is positioned along the inner surface 49 of the packer. The internal support 48 is shown in greater detail in
Referring back to
Optionally, the internal support may be provided with one or more apertures 64(
Referring still to
The external support 54 may be extendable from the downhole tool as indicated by the arrows. The external support may be extended to provide support over a greater portion of the peripheral surface of the packer when the probe is in the extended position. An actuator, for example a spring or hydraulic mechanism, may be used to selectively extend the external support the desired distance from the downhole tool.
In operation, as shown in
An alternate embodiment of the downhole tool 10a and probe 26a of
The piston 40a may selectively move within the probe 26a such that it may be positioned at various locations relative to the probe. For example, the piston may be retracted within the probe as depicted in
Internal support 48a is positioned along an inner surface 46a of packer 36a. In this embodiment, the internal support is a unitary piece slidingly movable within chamber 68a of piston body 35a. The internal support 48a has an inner surface 62a adapted to slidingly receive the piston 40a. A hydraulic actuator may be used to apply a force to internal support 48a to selectively advance and/or retract the internal support 48a. As will be described with respect to
External support 54a of
Another embodiment of the downhole tool 10b and probe 26b of
When in the engaged position of
Internal support 48b is positioned along an inner surface 46b of packer 36b. In this embodiment, the internal support is a unitary piece slidingly movable within chamber 68b of piston body 35a. Spring 41 assists in selectively extending internal support 46b during operation. The internal support 48b has an inner surface 62b adapted to slidingly receive the piston 40b.
External support 54b of
Packer 36c1 is provided with an internal support 48c1 and an external support 54c1. Packer 36c2 is provided with an internal support 48c2 and an external support 54c2. As shown in
As indicated in the other embodiments, the probe may be provided with pistons, sensors, filters and other devices for selectively drawing fluid into the downhole tool. Additionally, each support may be selectively movable along the adjacent surfaces of the packer, or fixed relative thereto.
It will be understood from the foregoing description that various modifications and changes may be made in the preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention without departing from its true spirit. For example, the internal and/or external support may remain fixed as the probe extends, or extend with the probe. When extendable, the supports may be telescopically extended, spring loaded, and adjustable. The external support may be connected to the downhole tool and/or the probe. Various combinations of the supports and the amount of surface area contact with the packer are envisioned.
This description is intended for purposes of illustration only and should not be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of this invention should be determined only by the language of the claims that follow. The term “comprising” within the claims is intended to mean “including at least” such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open group. “A,” “an” and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2389512 | Humason | Nov 1945 | A |
3173485 | Bretzke et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3261402 | Whitter | Jul 1966 | A |
3577782 | Altken | May 1971 | A |
3630282 | Lanmon, II | Dec 1971 | A |
3707195 | Lanmon, II | Dec 1972 | A |
3782191 | Whitten | Jan 1974 | A |
3813936 | Urbanosky et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3859851 | Urbanosky | Jan 1975 | A |
3864970 | Bell | Feb 1975 | A |
3924463 | Urbanosky | Dec 1975 | A |
3934468 | Brieger | Jan 1976 | A |
3952588 | Whitten | Apr 1976 | A |
4071085 | Grable et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4287946 | Brieger | Sep 1981 | A |
4860581 | Zimmerman et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4936139 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4951749 | Carroll | Aug 1990 | A |
4994671 | Safinya et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5303775 | Michaels et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5337821 | Peterson | Aug 1994 | A |
5377755 | Michaels et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
6192982 | Divis et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6230557 | Ciglenec et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6301959 | Hrametz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6388251 | Papanyan | May 2002 | B1 |
6427530 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435279 | Howe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467544 | Brown et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6568487 | Meister et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6585045 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609568 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6658930 | Abbas | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6659177 | Bolze et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6719049 | Sherwood et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6729399 | Follini et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745835 | Fields | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20020189339 | Montalvo et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030042021 | Bolze et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040000433 | Hill et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011525 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040079527 | Meister et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099443 | Meister et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040144533 | Zazovsky | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040173351 | Fox et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050161218 | Van Zuilekom et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 03097999 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03098639 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004020982 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004081334 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060075813 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |