1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to the optimization of electronic fuses, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for an electronic fuse polysilicon resistor for high current applications and increase resistance to ESD (electrostatic discharge) failure.
2. Background Description
Optimization of a polysilicon electronic fuse element is important for fuse initiation and verification of such initiation, and prevention of failure from ESD events. ESD events can lead to destructive failure of fuse elements.
In the related art fuses, the width of the salicided polysilicon film 14 is the same as the width of the polysilicon film 12. Consequently, as the polysilicon film 12 is made larger to withstand larger currents, the salicided polysilicon film 14 becomes larger and requires higher current loads to blow. Conversely, as the salicided polysilicon film 14 is reduced in size to blow at smaller currents, the polysilicon film 12 becomes more susceptible to damage.
As a result, the window in which to blow the salicide film 14 and maintain the integrity of the insulator 12 and related polysilicon line is narrow. In other words, there is a small difference between the minimum current necessary to blow the fuse and the amount of current which will damage the insulator supporting the salicided film 12. As such, the current pulse width to implement the fuse blow is limited to a relatively narrow given time and current domain. Accordingly, a blown fuse may be accompanied by a damaged insulator impairing functioning of the associated circuit.
At electric currents above the critical current-to-failure, the related art polysilicon fuse resistor structure can lead to metal blistering, extrusion and melting. High current flow through the structure of related art fuses can lead to cracking of the insulator films due to high thermal and mechanical stress. Thermal gradients in the surrounding insulator which may lead to mechanical stresses which exceed the yield stress can lead to insulator cracking. Such cracking can cause loss of integrity of the dielectric and semiconductor chip. Accordingly, related art fuses may malfunction when blowing upon the application of high currents.
Hence, because related art fuses are susceptible to damage due to high currents, a structure which can sustain high currents and maintain structural integrity and yet lead to fuse initiation and removal of the salicide during the fuse initiation is needed.
In a first aspect of the invention, an electronic fuse is provided. The electronic fuse includes an insulating film and at least one conductive region partially covering the insulating film. At least one non-conductive region is provided on the insulating film adjacent the conductive region.
In another aspect of the invention, the electronic fuse includes a polysilicon film with a top surface and a conductive film disposed on the top surface of the polysilicon film forming a plurality of separate conductive regions.
Non-conductive regions are provided between the plurality of separate conductive regions.
In another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for forming a fuse. T he method includes forming and defining an insulator film, and forming at least one conductive region adjacent to at least one non-conductive region on a surface of the insulator film.
The invention relates to the optimization of electronic fuses, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for an electronic fuse polysilicon resistor for high current applications and increase resistance to ESD (electrostatic discharge) failure. In the invention, a conductive region is provided on the surface of an insulator with a non-conductive region adjacent thereto. The insulator may also be a resistor. By positioning a conductive region adjacent to a non-conductive region on the insulator, thermal stress in the insulator due to current flowing through the conductive region is spread over a larger area, thus reducing the localized peak stress in the insulator. With stress reduced in such a manner, higher currents may pass through the conductive region without causing damage to the insulator. Accordingly, the fuse structure tends to maintain its structural integrity at high currents, making it suitable for some types of high current applications.
The invention also divides current into localized flowpaths or conductive regions, and those flow-paths are distributed across the surface of an insulator or resistor. Such a distribution of current over the surface reduces thermal stresses in the insulator or resistor, and reduces the risk of damage to the underlying insulator or resistor substrate in high current applications. Additionally, the structure has a high tolerance to high current and maintains structural and material integrity under high current applications which reduces the possibility of failure due to ESD or high current. The invention also provides an electronic fuse blow resistor structure where structure integrity remains intact after the fuse blows and, additionally, has a well controlled failure process to facilitate distinguishing between an “open” and a “short” circuit. The invention also provides a high tolerance resistor element for high current RF applications.
Referring now to the drawings,
Although
In addition to the various conductor patterns mentioned above, certain embodiments may have conductors of 100 to 400 Å in thickness, for example, with widths and lengths being a function of the application, all depending on the resistance value desired. Additional examples of materials from which to make the conductors include salicided polysilicon and various metals, such as, for example, aluminum, copper, titanium or other refractory materials.
In operation, current flows through metal contacts 16 and a fuse lead 26. The current then flows through the conductive regions or strips 22 to the opposite fuse lead 26 and corresponding metal contact 16. By having multiple conductive regions 22 separated by non-conductive regions 24, current flow is directed along discrete local paths distributed across the top of the insulator 12. Such localized and separate paths of current flow on top of the insulator 12 and reduce thermal stress within the insulator 12. Thus, the insulator 12 can withstand higher levels of current flow through the conductive regions 22 before being stressed to failure. However, because the cross-sectional area of all the conductive regions 22 is still relatively small, the fuse will blow at current levels similar to the related art fuse.
Where the insulator 12 is a polysilicon film or resistor, allowing for a wider polysilicon film or resistor can also lead to the prevention of the polysilicon film or resistor failure.
By allowing the polysilicon film to be wider, the failure of the polysilicon film will be lessened because the thermal stresses therein will be reduced. Such a molten filamentation occurs in the polysilicon resistor element when the current exceeds the Pcrit, i.e.; the critical power to failure of the polysilicon film. Such failure can be calculated as follows:
V(a)2=(I2goxTm/gIdpdox)(1−F(a))/(30−F(a)) Eq. 1
F(a)=tan h(α((a−w)/2)/tan h(αa/2) Eq. 2
α2=rSigox/dpdox Eq. 3
V is voltage, r is resistance, Tm is temperature of a metal, w is width of a line, “a” is a parameter of constriction of the line, gox is gate conductance, gl is film conductance, dp is the thickness of the polysilicon and dox is the thickness of the oxide.
The failure of polysilicon film is also well determined from ESD testing of unsalicided polysilicon resistor elements.
ESD experimental results show that the ESD robustness increases with the width of the polysilicon strip. Hence, the ESD robustness of the element also increases with the width of the polysilicon fuse or resistor. However, by using a salicide block mask to form conductive regions, the current can be limited to the salicide film or conductive regions leading to failure of the conductor without rupture of the polysilicon film or resistor.
The ESD robustness of an individual wire is a function of the cross sectional area. The smaller the cross sectional area of the wire, the lower the ESD robustness, which can lead to improved accuracy of the digitization. It should also be understood that the more strips, at a smaller cross section will also provide more discrete digitization. For example, 20 strips at 5 microns will have a more discrete digitization than 10 strips at 10 microns, even though there is a same cross sectional area. This is because there are more strips that can “blow” thus increasing the step-wise digitization of a device.
The conductive regions of the electronic fuse or resistor are configured so that the electrical resistances will be “digitized” and the resistance will undergo step changes as the number of conductive regions or fingers of the salicide film begins to fail. The digitation of the conductor strips will allow digitized sensing levels which are helpful for digital circuits to determine the failure of one or more of the conductive regions or fingers. In electrical failure, damage can lead to non-uniformities and irregularities in the resistance magnitude. Using conductive regions such as a salicide finger set, the optimization of the circuit and fuse resistance magnitudes will step through the failure points as particular conductive regions rupture or fail. This method may allow an improved sensing scheme well suited to digital circuits.
Referring to
As another example, a salicide block mask may be used to form a set of conductive regions or comb fingers of salicided regions. Such a structure will cause current to flow along narrow stripes of the salicided region. As the current increases, the salicide fingers will blow leading to opening of the fuse with minimized thermal stress in the underlying substrate.
Referring to
By structuring the fuse to blow in discrete steps, the fuse blows in a more predictable manner. Additionally, the fuse will have as many blow-steps as there are conductive regions. The stepwise blowing of the fuse reduces the chance that the fuse will malfunction by partially blowing and still conduct some current. Such a failure mode is further avoided because of the reduced thermal stress in the underlying insulator or resistor film.
Also, because the fuse blows in discrete steps and it has prescribed changes in resistance, the fuse described herein exhibits discrete resistance values. The discrete resistance values make the device amenable to digital sensing to determine whether it is in a blown or intact state. Additionally, the fuse may function as a programmable resistor having well-characterized resistor value options available to the user.
It should also be understood that the fuse of the invention will be used in a semiconductor environment and can be used in, for example, CMOS technology, Si on Insulator technology or SiGe technologies, to name a few. It is also well understood in the art that the insulator around the structure can be of different thermal conductivities.
While the invention has been described in terms of various embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification and still remain within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, multiple fuse elements may be combined with multiple resistor elements to form a component which reverts to a specified resistive value in the event of fuse rupture.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1036510 | Murray | Aug 1912 | A |
2288428 | Babler | Jun 1942 | A |
2934627 | Bristol et al. | Apr 1960 | A |
3358363 | Jacks et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3810063 | Blewitt | May 1974 | A |
4376927 | McGalliard | Mar 1983 | A |
4518981 | Schlupp | May 1985 | A |
4706059 | Schmitt | Nov 1987 | A |
4748491 | Takagi | May 1988 | A |
4873506 | Gurevich | Oct 1989 | A |
5479147 | Montgomery | Dec 1995 | A |
5726621 | Whitney et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5775940 | Tanigawa | Jul 1998 | A |
5790007 | Yasukuni | Aug 1998 | A |
5864277 | Grimm et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5923239 | Krueger et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936880 | Payne | Aug 1999 | A |
6088256 | Worley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6147586 | Saitoh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6249037 | Manning | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6368902 | Kothandaraman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6486527 | MacPherson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507087 | Yu | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525397 | Kalnitsky et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6580156 | Ito et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6710699 | Kaltenborn et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20020086462 | Kothandaraman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102839 | Gonzalez et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030025177 | Kothandaraman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050122204 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |