Patent Grant
6990744
This invention is related to other inventions made by at least one of the inventors herein for Individually-Contoured Seat Cushion and Shape Capturing and Fabricating Method for Seat Cushion described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,858, for Modular Seat Cushion with Interlocking Human Support and Base Portions and Method of Creating a Seat Cushion described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,859, and for Contoured Seat Cushion and Method for Offloading Pressure from Skeletal Bone Prominences and Encouraging Proper Postural Alignment described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,860, all of which are filed concurrently herewith and all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present invention. The subject matter of these concurrently-filed applications is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to seat cushions. More particularly the present invention relates to a new and improved apparatus and method for evaluating the effectiveness of a support contour of a seat cushion against that portion of the user's anatomy in contact with the seat cushion. The new and improved apparatus and method of the present invention is particularly useful in evaluating the degree of clearance between the support contour and the skin of the user, thereby indicating the ability of the support contour to avoid pressure and shear forces on the skin of the user with a subsequent decrease in risk for pressure ulcers. The present invention is particularly useful in evaluating the effectiveness of seat cushions for wheelchair users, although the present invention is not specifically limited to such use. The clearance evaluation information is obtained quickly, inexpensively and effectively.
A wheelchair seat cushion must perform a number of important functions. The seat cushion should be comfortable and capable of providing proper support for optimal posture and posture control for a considerable length of time. The seat cushion should also assist, or at least not materially hinder, the user in maneuvering the wheelchair, permit a useful range of motion from the pelvis and upper torso of the person, and create stability and security for the person within the wheelchair. Perhaps most importantly, the seat cushion should help prevent and reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers created by prolonged sitting on the cushion without adequate pressure relief. Pressure ulcers can become a very serious health problem for individuals who must remain constantly in contact with the support cushion, and it is important to avoid such pressure ulcers.
Wheelchair users like everyone are of substantially different sizes, weights and shapes. Many wheelchair users have physical disabilities and associated posture and postural control impairments such as those typically caused by congenital disorders. Other wheelchair users, such as those who have been disabled by acquired or traumatic injuries, may have a more typical size and shape. In all of these cases, the support contour of the wheelchair seat cushion must safely support the anatomy of the user, whether the anatomy is abnormal or more typical. Wheelchair seat cushions must fit and perform properly to prevent further physical impairment and pressure ulcers. The cushion must also enhance the functional capabilities of the user by supporting independence in activities of daily living.
To provide the best individualized support, the cushion must accommodate the anatomical particularities and preferences of the user. Custom wheelchair cushions are used for this purpose. A custom wheelchair cushion is created from an impression of the anatomy of the user. After capturing a shape of the user's anatomy, the captured shape is used to construct a mold for the cushion. Then the mold is used to fabricate the cushion, including the support contour which interfaces with the user's anatomy from which the shape was originally captured. There are a number of different theories for configuring the support contour to address the perceived needs and requirements of the user.
The most prevalent approach used to configure the support contour of a custom cushion, at least at the time of filing hereof, is to distribute the weight of the user substantially uniformly over the entire support contour. The uniform pressure distribution is theorized to reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers because the uniform pressure distribution is thought to avoid localized high-pressure points which cause pressure ulcers. The substantial conformance of the support contour to the anatomical shape of the user is also believed to encourage the user toward proper postural alignment.
A new support theory is described in the above-identified U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,860. This new support theory is based on offloading and isolating pressure and shear forces from the skin surrounding the bony prominences of the user's pelvic area skeletal structure. Applying this support theory involves configuring the support contour with additional clearance, and therefore achieving greater pressure relief, around the ischial tuberosities, the greater trochantors, the coccyx and the sacrum in the pelvic area, while transferring more support to the broader tissue and musculature below the proximal thigh leg bones and at the posterior lateral buttocks. Pressure and shear forces on the skin around the bony prominences is relieved, and pressure is transferred to the broader tissue areas to encourage proper postural alignment.
The effectiveness of implementing any of the different support theories depends on evaluating the fit of the support contour. The user may offer comment about the feel of the support contour. However, in some cases the user is unable to offer meaningful comments, because the aspects of the fit may not be apparent to the user except in extremely exaggerated circumstances. Some wheelchair users may not have the neurological capacity to feel those areas of their anatomy which contact the seat cushion. It is common for a trained assistant to insert his or her fingers between the user and the support contour to evaluate the degree of clearance, but such an approach generally does not provide an objective evaluation. Moreover, certain areas of fit, such as the area directly under the user at the ischial tuberosities cannot be felt at all, because this location is too far underneath the user to be reached. For the evaluation to be effective, the user cannot move from a normal sitting position, because to do so alters the entire interaction of the anatomy with the support contour to such a degree that no aspect of the fit is normal. Moving to an abnormal position against the support contour to provide space for finger evaluation is therefore meaningless.
Pressure mapping has also been used to evaluate the fit of a person with the support contour of a seat cushion. Pressure mapping requires the use of a blanket-like device having hundreds or thousands of pressure sensors distributed in a grid-like manner over the entire surface. Each of the pressure sensors is connected by electrical conductors. The blanket-like pressure mapping device is placed on top of the support contour, and the individual is seated on top of the mapping device. The pressure sensors of the mapping device are located between the support contour and the anatomy of the individual. By individually reading the pressure measurements of each sensor, and correlating the positions of the sensors relative to the support contour, the pressure distribution over the entire support contour can be evaluated. Any areas of increased pressure, where pressure ulcers may ultimately occur, are accurately identified.
Such pressure mapping devices are quite effective. However, they are also expensive and require auxiliary computer support equipment to correlate the individual pressure measurements to positions on the support contour and to evaluate the pressure distribution over the support contour. The vast majority of providers and prescribers of specialized seat cushions do not have access to pressure mapping devices. Pressure mapping is costly and requires a degree of training to become competent in its use.
While such pressure mapping devices are effective in evaluating relative pressure, they are not effective in measuring the extent or degree of clearance. In general, an indication of a lack of pressure is a suggestion of some amount of clearance at a particular location between the anatomy and the support contour, but the extent of the clearance or separation is not indicated by a relative lack of pressure.
Some support theories are primarily dependent on clearance, rather than pressure. One such support theory is described in the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,860. This support theory requires sufficient clearance at locations where pressure is completely offloaded from the bony prominences of the pelvic area of the user, and maintenance of that clearance during acceptable changes in posture of the user, during normal ranges of user movement. The clearance should also accommodate a reasonable level of tissue change or atrophy over time. Under these circumstances, the degree or amount of clearance becomes a very important variable. The degree of clearance relates to the ability of the support contour to accommodate or compensate for the range of posture changes, normal movement and tissue and musculature atrophy before those changes become so significant that the clearance disappears and the risk of pressure ulcers arises. An indication of a relative lack of pressure under one postural, movement or tissue condition may not be a reliable indication of sufficient clearance to avoid pressure and shear forces on the tissue under other dynamic conditions. A pressure mapping device is not entirely useful to evaluate the clearance relationship of the user's anatomy relative to the support contour of the seat cushion, under these circumstances.
Many of the same considerations also apply with varying levels of criticality to other uses of seat cushions. For example, seat cushions used in office environments are required to support the user in a comfortable manner which encourages proper posture and without creating risks of medical problems, for example inducing blood circulatory problems. Evaluating the suitability of a support contour of an office chair to an office worker, or a similar situation is within the scope of the present invention.
This invention obtains information concerning the fit of a user's anatomy in relation to the support contour of a seat cushion in a relatively quick, inexpensive and effective manner. The amount of clearance between the anatomy of the user and the support contour at selected locations is evaluated. The clearance may be evaluated at any location where the support contour contacts the anatomy, including those locations which cannot readily be accessed while the user remains in proper and usual contact with the support contour. The clearance information may be evaluated under dynamic circumstances caused by changes in posture, normal movement and other actual conditions of use. The clearance may be evaluated without the use of sophisticated and expensive measuring equipment. The clearance information is particularly useful in evaluating the risk of pressure ulcers to a wheelchair user under circumstances where the support contour of the wheelchair seat cushion is intended to offload pressure and shear forces by establishing a desired amount of clearance from the user's anatomy at certain locations.
These and other aspects and features of the invention are realized from a method of evaluating clearance between a support contour of a seat cushion and an adjacent pelvic and proximal thigh anatomical portion of a person sitting on the cushion. The method involves the use of a clearance measurement device which deforms in response to force applied thereto. The clearance measurement device is located on the support contour at a predetermined location where the clearance is to be evaluated. A person sits on the cushion with the clearance measurement device located between the person's anatomical portion and the support contour at the predetermined location where the clearance is to be evaluated. The clearance at that predetermined location is evaluated by determining the extent to which the clearance measurement device was deformed.
The clearance measurement device may take the form of a piece of impression foam having a crush characteristic which collapses the impression foam upon the application of force to the impression foam. The clearance is evaluated by the extent to which the impression foam has collapsed. The crush characteristics of the impression foam preferably provide a capability to collapse to between 80% and 90% of its initial non-collapsed thickness. The preferable crush resistance or force is within the range of 1.50 to 1.85 pounds per square inch.
The clearance measurement device may also take the form of a piece of putty-like substance having a malleable characteristic which indents upon the application of force to the putty. The clearance is evaluated by establishing a predetermined thickness of the putty-like substance. The extent to which the putty-like substance was indented is then determined.
The clearance measurement device may also take the form of a flexible envelope containing fluid. Pressure is applied to the flexible envelope by sitting the person on the cushion with the envelope between the anatomical portion and the support contour. The clearance is evaluated by determining the amount of fluid remaining in the envelope. Preferably, the envelope includes a one-way valve which permits fluid flow out of the envelope but prevents fluid flow into the envelope.
The method of the present invention is particularly useful for determining a better one of a plurality of different cushions which each have a different support contour. The method is used in the manner described with a first cushion having a first support contour, and is then performed again with a second cushion having a second support contour. The better one of the two support contours is selected by evaluating the clearances of the two support contours relative to one another.
A more complete appreciation of the scope of the present invention and the manner in which it achieves the above-noted and other improvements can be obtained by reference to the following detailed description of presently preferred embodiments taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, which are briefly summarized below, and by reference to the appended claims.
Although not limited specifically in this regard, the present invention is particularly useful in measuring the clearance between an individual 20 and a support contour 22 (
As may be understood from
One advantageous type of support theory is described in the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,860. That support theory involves offloading pressure and shear forces from the skin in areas surrounding bony prominences of the user's skeletal structure. The offloading is accomplished by providing a relatively significant relief or clearance between the support contour 22 and the bony prominences created by the ischial tuberosities 30, the greater trochanters 32, and the coccyx 34 and sacrum 36 of the pelvic area skeletal structure 38, as understood from
To offload pressure and provide clearance with respect to the bony prominences of the pelvic area 38 and to apply contact and support pressure at the other areas of the pelvic area 38, the support contour 22 includes a relatively deep center cavity 42 which is positioned in the support contour 22 to be located directly below ischial tuberosities 30 of the pelvic skeletal structure 38, when the user is seated on the cushion 24 as shown in
The support contour 22 rises from the lowermost surface area 44 on opposite transverse sides of the cavity 42 to a relief area 46. A horizontal portion of the relief area 46 is located directly below the greater trochanters 32 on opposite lateral sides of the pelvic skeletal structure 38, when the user is seated on the cushion 20. The relief area 46 also curves transversely outwardly and upwardly from where the horizontal portion of the relief area 46 generally joins the cavity 42. The horizontal and the transversely outwardly and upwardly curved portions of the relief area 46 is shaped to establish a radius-like clearance with respect to the greater trochanters 32, and this clearance is effective to offload pressure and sheer forces from the greater trochanters 32, as shown in
The support contour 22 also includes a vertically extending indented or convex channel area 48 which extends vertically upward from the lowermost surface area 44 of the cavity 42. The channel area 48 is located at approximately the transverse center of a rear wall 50 of the cavity 42. The channel area 48 is positioned in the support contour 22 to be located directly behind the coccyx 34 and the sacrum 36 of the pelvic skeletal structure 38, when the user is seated in the cushion 24. The degree of indention of the channel area 48 into the rear wall 50 establishes clearance between the channel area 48 and the coccyx 34 and sacrum 36. The amount of this clearance is sufficient to offload pressure from the tissue surrounding the coccyx and sacrum. The amount of clearance extends transversely beyond each opposite lateral side of the coccyx 34 and the sacrum 36, to accommodate a normal range of movement of the user and a reasonable amount of tissue atrophy.
The lowermost surface area 44 of the cavity 42, the relief areas 46, and the channel area 48 generally have the shape and position, relative to the anatomical shape of the user, to provide additional clearance in the support contour 22 in the location of the areas 44, 46 and 48, as shown in
The increased clearance from the areas 44, 46 and 48, and the increased prominence of the support areas 52, 54, 56 and 58, make the support contour 32 more generally applicable to different classes of users. By adjusting the extent of clearances in the areas 44, 46 and 48 and the extent of the prominence of the support areas 52, 54, 56 and 58, a few different sizes or configurations of the support contour 22 will generally accommodate a relatively wide population of users. The benefits of the support contour 22 are therefore able to be extended to a substantial population of wheelchair users by providing a few different types of seat cushions. This benefit is more specifically described in the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,859.
The support contour 22 also includes a clearance or relief area 59 which provides additional clearance in the perineal or genital area for the user sitting on the support contour 22. The additional clearance area 59 creates a space for relief of pressure and enhancement of air circulation where the skin is prone to breakdown from heat and moisture. Relieving the pressure and providing a space for air circulation in the area 59 is a substantial benefit to wheelchair and other users who must remain seated for long periods of time, by reducing the incidence of skin breakdown and sores in the perineal area.
The clearance area 59 generally curves upwardly and forwardly from the lowermost surface area 44 of the cavity 42. This upward and forward curvature is more gentle and extends farther forward than a more abrupt vertical and forward curvature of the cavity 42 beneath the thigh bones 40. Consequently in a transverse sense, the area 59 extends slightly forwardly from the rear of the thigh support areas 56 and 58, as shown in
A clearance measuring device 60, shown in
The clearance measuring device 60 is used as shown generally in
Depending upon the type of clearance measurement desired, the user may remain static while in contact with the support contour 22, or may move through the normal range of movement that would typically occur while the user is in dynamic contact with the support contour. The degree of collapse, indention or compression of the foam pad 62, if any, will be evaluated to determine the amount of clearance under the static conditions. Under the dynamic conditions created by user movement, the compression of the foam pad 62 will reflect variations in clearance created by the movement.
After the foam pad 62 of the device 60 has been positioned and compressed between a selected position on the support contour 22 and the user's anatomy, the user is removed from contact with the device 60 and the support contour 22. An impression 66 will have been created in the foam pad 62, as shown in
To the extent that the impression 66 is located in the interior of the foam pad 62, as shown in
The ability to obtain accurate clearance measurements by evaluating the extent to which the foam pad 62 is crushed or compressed results from the crush characteristics of the impression foam used in the pad 62. The important crush characteristics are illustrated by the curve 70 shown in
It is within the range of crushing distances between points and 74 and 76 that the impression foam of the present invention should be used. Point 74 represents the uncrushed surface of the foam pad 62 (
The average ratio of the original height or thickness of the impression foam (the distance between points 74 and 78) and the distance that the impression foam will crush under relatively uniform force or resistance (the distance between points 74 and 76) is preferably equal to or greater than 5 to 1 (5:1). The average ratio of the original starting thickness of the impression foam to the maximum compressed height at the asymptotic limit of the vertically extending portion of the curve 70 is approximately 10 to 1 (10:1). The ability of the impression foam to collapse in range of ⅕ to 1/10 of its original thickness assures that a sufficient thickness of non-collapsed impression foam in the pad 62 by which to evaluate the amount of clearance. To the extent that the clearance is very small or nonexistent, that circumstance will be revealed as a result of the foam pad 62 becoming fully crushed. However, under those circumstances, the thickness of the fully crushed foam pad will usually not be so great as to create such an unusual abnormal thickness against the support contour 22 that adversely influences the position of the anatomy against the support contour.
In addition to the desired crush-distance characteristics, the impression foam has an extremely low modulus of elasticity, making it very inelastic. The crushed portions (e.g. the impression 66,
The impression foam also has very slight compressive strength. The slight compression strength allows for accurate and precise compression or crushing of the foam pad 62 without the foam pad 62 adversely influencing the fit of the anatomy within the support contour 62. Impression foam which has proved satisfactory has a preferred crushing force resistance of approximately 1.56 pounds per square inch. In general, however, an acceptable range of crushing force resistance will be within the range of 1.50–1.85 pounds per square inch. Higher crushing forces might resist the weight and contact of the user's anatomy to such a degree that a greater amount of actual clearance would be shown than would exist without the foam in place. Lower crushing force resistance will cause the impression foam to crumble and crack, making the created impression 66 useless or difficult to evaluate.
The impression foam collapses or crushes by first crushing the exterior layers of the foam lattice structure. As the crushing progresses, thin layers of crushed or failed material build up adjacent to the forcing shape because those failed layers have been fully compressed, in the same manner as full compression of the entire thickness of the impression foam, represented by the distance between points 76 and 78. Thin layers of the impression foam material beneath the fully crushed layers continue to crush at the uniform resistance or force represented by point 72 until the extent of the crushing reaches its full extent at point 76.
Impression foam having these preferred characteristics is similar to the type of foam used by florists in creating flower arrangements. However, much of the floral foam does not crush sufficiently within the preferred range of crushing force resistance. Some of the other preferred characteristics of the impression foam may also be met by typical floral foam. However, manufacturers of floral foam are able to adjust their fabrication processes to achieve impression foam having the characteristics preferred for use in this invention.
Another embodiment 80 of a clearance measuring device in accordance with the present invention is shown in
To evaluate the clearance, the pad 82 is placed in contact with that portion of the support contour 22 where the clearance is to be measured. The user's anatomy is thereafter contacted in the normal manner with the support contour. Depending upon whether a static clearance measurement or a dynamic clearance measurement is desired, the user either remains stationary while in contact with the support contour or the user moves through a normal range of movement. Thereafter, the user withdraws from contact with the support contour.
The pad 82 is then evaluated, as shown in
Another embodiment 90 of the clearance measuring device of the present invention is shown in
To use the device 90, the device 90 is positioned at the desired location for measuring a clearance between a desired portion of a support contour 22 and the anatomy of the user. Thereafter, the user contacts his or her anatomy with the support contour at the location of the device 90. Pressure from the anatomical contact with the inflated envelope 92 causes the air or fluid to escape from the valve 96, until the envelope 92 is deflated into the space defined by the clearance. Once deflated into the space defined by the clearance, there is no longer sufficient pressure to force the air or fluid from the valve 96.
The extent of clearance is evaluated by removing the device 90 and then evaluating the thickness of the envelope 92. The thickness of the envelope 92 is reflected by the amount of air remaining in the envelope, and that amount of air generally represents the amount of clearance. To use the device 90 effectively, the envelope 92 should be of approximately the desired size of the clearance area of the support contour which is to be measured. A larger envelope would allow air or fluid to be confined within or expelled from the envelope 92 from pressure at locations other than the position where the clearance is measured. The amount of remaining air under these conditions would not adequately represent the clearance at the desired location of measurement, because the extent to which the air was confined or expelled from the envelope at the other locations would inaccurately affect the thickness of the envelope 92 as a measurement of the clearance at the desired location.
All three embodiments 60, 80 and 90 of clearance measuring devices can be positioned at locations where contact of the user's anatomy with the support contour makes it impossible to feel the extent of clearance on an accurate and reliable basis. The clearance measurement devices 60, 80 and 90 can be constructed relatively inexpensively. The devices 80 and 90 can be reused by evening out the thickness of the pad 82 or by adding more air to the envelope 92. Although the foam pad 62 cannot be reused, the cost of the impression foam used in the device 60 is relatively inexpensive. Each of the clearance measuring devices is effective in measuring the clearance under static and dynamic conditions. No sophisticated equipment or training is required in order to evaluate the clearance.
One of the particularly useful aspects of the clearance measuring devices of the present invention is to assist a user in selecting a wheelchair seat cushion having a support contour 22 with adequate support characteristics for that user's anatomy. In the circumstance where a few different wheelchair seat cushions with different support contours 22 are used to address the needs of a substantial portion of the wheelchair user population without using a custom cushion, as discussed more particularly in the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/628,859, the adequacy of each different cushion is easily determined by placing one of the clearance measuring devices 60, 80 or 90 between the user and the support contour of the proposed wheelchair seat cushion to evaluate the extent of clearance and thus the effectiveness of the support contour with respect to the bony prominences of that particular user. To evaluate the clearance under exaggerated conditions, the user may even be forced downward into the support contour. The added force allows evaluation of the adaptability of the clearance to change. In this manner, the proper size and fit of a wheelchair cushion for a particular user is readily determined.
Another particularly advantageous use of the clearance measuring devices of the present invention is to evaluate the effectiveness of a seat cushion after it has been used for some amount of time. The support contour of the seat cushion may tend to break down with use, with certain areas of the support contour failing to provide adequate clearance to protect against pressure points that could create pressure ulcers. Wheelchair users are also subject to a certain degree of tissue atrophy. The tissue atrophy changes the anatomical contour and may cause pressure points, or diminish a clearance that could lead to pressure points. Under these circumstances, the use of the clearance measuring devices will quickly reveal the extent of the clearance and the necessity to obtain a new or different wheelchair cushion. Many other advantages and improvements will be apparent upon gaining a full appreciation of the significance of the present invention.
A presently preferred embodiment of the present invention and many of its improvements have been described with a degree of particularity. This description is a preferred example of implementing the invention, and is not necessarily intended to limit the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is defined by the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1742183 | Claus | Jan 1930 | A |
| 1961641 | Ollis | Jun 1934 | A |
| 2156629 | Hutchison | May 1939 | A |
| 2384713 | Varma | Sep 1945 | A |
| 2472754 | Mead | Jun 1949 | A |
| 2659418 | Berman | Nov 1953 | A |
| 2933738 | Whelan | Apr 1960 | A |
| 3158878 | Pernell | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3177036 | Halter | Apr 1965 | A |
| 3222694 | Schick | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3511537 | Ackermann | May 1970 | A |
| 3749442 | Berg et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3987507 | Hall | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4132228 | Green | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4327046 | Davis et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4347213 | Rogers, Jr. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4522447 | Snyder et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4567887 | Couch, Jr. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4588229 | Jay | May 1986 | A |
| 4615856 | Silverman | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4643481 | Saloff et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4682818 | Morell | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4726624 | Jay | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4753480 | Morell | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4756090 | Pedrow | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4824174 | Dunn, Sr. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4842330 | Jay | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4889387 | Gregory | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4890235 | Reger et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4912788 | Lonardo | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4951334 | Maier | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4972351 | Reger et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4998354 | Silverman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5018790 | Jay | May 1991 | A |
| 5079790 | Pouch | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5092655 | Deegener et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5163737 | Navach et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5180619 | Landi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5189747 | Mundy et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193285 | Heinrich et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5255404 | Dinsmoor, III et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5282286 | MacLeish | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5288135 | Forcier et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5294181 | Rose et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5317773 | Graebe | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5333921 | Dinsmoor, III | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5343876 | Rogers | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5352023 | Jay et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5369829 | Jay | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5378045 | Siekman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5390384 | Dinsmoor, III et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5395162 | Jay et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5397517 | Jay et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5414884 | Mackenzie | May 1995 | A |
| 5442823 | Siekman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444881 | Landi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5452940 | Maier | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5457833 | Jay | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5461741 | Graebe | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5470590 | Brubaker et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5490299 | Dinsmoor, III et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5496610 | Landi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5513899 | Michaels et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5522106 | Harrison et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5524971 | Jay et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5551107 | Graebe | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5551756 | Gurasich et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5592707 | Dinsmoor, III et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5613256 | Hanson | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613257 | Graebe | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617595 | Landi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5671977 | Jay et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5681092 | Hanson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5687436 | Denton | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5836025 | Poncy, Sr. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840400 | Landi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5920915 | Bainbridge et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6018832 | Graebe | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032300 | Bainbridge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6055676 | Bainbridge et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6082824 | Chow | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6161238 | Graebe | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6182314 | Frydman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6241320 | Chew et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6293026 | Lee et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293625 | Dixon | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6301722 | Nickerson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6345401 | Frydman | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6357054 | Bainbridge et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6430831 | Sundman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6453477 | Bainbridge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6493958 | Tadin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6502263 | Rowley et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6611980 | Wempe | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6625897 | Tadin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6845568 | Ward | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6883243 | Ramcke | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6904692 | Tadin | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 20010013146 | Wempe | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20030121103 | Wempe | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20050025953 | Hetzel et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050116380 | Tadin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 768163 | Aug 1934 | FR |
| 2016918 | Oct 1979 | GB |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050022406 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
