None.
None.
None.
1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates to printers and printing systems. More particularly, the disclosure relates to an apparatus and method for evaluating the programming of an identifier on print media, such as an RFID tag, within a printing device.
2. Description of the Related Art
Inkjet and laser printers have become commonplace equipment in most workplace and home computing environments. Today, many printers are multi-functional assemblies capable of printing on a large array of print media including letterhead, paper envelopes and labels. A recent innovation in the printing industry involves the manufacturing of print media with embedded radio frequency signatures in the form of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) transponders or tags. These tags, sometimes called “Smart Labels”, may be used with a variety of existing printing methods.
Embedded print media may include a backing material (sometimes referred to as the “web”) upon which a label is applied, with a RFID tag sandwiched in between the label and the backing material. There may be one or more labels on the web and the sheet, as presented, may be part label and part plain paper. In some cases there may be more than one tag arrayed across the width and down the length of the media such that multiple columns and/or rows of tags are contained on the print media.
Printing on media with embedded RFID tags is rapidly becoming a growing area of label printing. Each tag on a sheet can be printed with certain data, and the RFID tag embedded within that media can be used to allow individualized processing of user associated data. For example, a shipping label might have the delivery address and a package tracking ID printed on it, while the corresponding tag would be programmed with the same information. The delivery information may then be read from the tag, whether or not the package is positioned so that the tag is visible.
Field service personnel are often required to verify that a printing device is working properly before, during and after a repair has been made. However, an RFID enabled printing device may pose particular problems for the technician. For example, while print defects introduced by a malfunctioning printer may be readily visible, it may be difficult to determine whether an RFID tag has been successfully programmed.
In accordance with one exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure relates to a printing system for media containing one or a plurality of identifiers including a processor capable of forwarding programming data in a first print job to an identifier, reading data from the identifier in response to a second print job and comparing the data from the identifier with the programming data. Based upon such comparison, the processor may generate an error signal or approval signal.
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure relates to a method for evaluating the operation of a printing device. The method includes forwarding programming data in a first print job to an identifier, reading data from the identifier in response to a second print job and comparing the data from the identifier with the programming data. Based upon such comparison, an error signal or approval signal may be generated.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure relates to an article comprising a storage medium having stored thereon instructions that when executed by a machine result in the following: forwarding programming data in a first print job to an identifier, reading data from the identifier in response to a second print job, and comparing the data from the identifier with the programming data.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this disclosure, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the disclosure will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the disclosure taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
It is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The disclosure is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless limited otherwise, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” and “mounted,” and variations thereof herein are used broadly and encompass direct and indirect connections, couplings, and mountings. In addition, the terms “connected” and “coupled” and variations thereof are not restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings.
For simplicity the discussion below will use the terms “media,” “sheet” and/or “paper” to refer to a discrete unit of media. It should be understood, however, that this term is not limited to paper sheets, and any form of discrete media is intended to be encompassed therein, including without limitation, envelopes, transparencies, postcards, labels, and the like. The disclosure herein also applies to printing devices such as an electrophotographic printer, an inkjet printer, a fax device, a copier, an all-in-one device, an RFID printer or a multipurpose device.
Referring now to the drawings,
Printing system 10 may also contain at least one serial input or parallel input port, network or USB port, or in many cases both types of input ports, as designated by the reference numeral 18 for the serial port and the reference numeral 20 for the parallel port. Each of these ports 18 and 20 may be connected to a corresponding input buffer, generally designated by the reference numeral 22 on
Once the text of graphical data has been received by input buffer 22, it may be communicated to one or more interpreters designated by the reference numeral 28. A common interpreter is PostScript™, which is an industry standard used by some laser printers. After being interpreted, the input data may be sent to a common graphics engine to be rasterized, which may occur in a portion of RAM designated by the reference numeral 30 on
Once the data has been rasterized, it may be directed into a Queue Manager or page buffer, which may be a portion of RAM designated by the reference numeral 34. In a typical laser printer, an entire page of rasterized data may be stored in the Queue Manager during the time interval that it takes to physically print the hard copy for that page. The data within the Queue Manager 34 may be communicated in real time to a print engine designated by the reference numeral 36. Print engine 36 may include a laser light source within its printhead (not shown), and its output may be the physical marking on a piece of paper, which may be the final print output from printing system 10.
In some embodiments, the address, data, and control lines may be grouped in buses, which are electrically conductive pathways that are physically communicated in parallel (sometimes also multiplexed) around the various electronic components within printing system 10. For example, the address and data buses may be sent to all ROM and RAM integrated circuits and the control lines or interrupt lines may be directed to all input or output integrated circuits that act as buffers.
Print engine 36 may contain the core print logic which may be embodied in an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) (not shown), for example, and which may act as the printing device's primary controller and data manipulating device for the various hardware components within the print engine 36. The bitmap print data arriving from Queue Manager 34 may be received by the core print logic, and at the proper moments may be sent in a serialized format to the laser printhead.
The print engine 36 may be in communication with a number of paper-handling devices via a communications bus 70. Some of the paper-handling devices depicted on
Print engine 36 may also be in communication with a number of RFID devices. For example, an RF device controller 38 may be included that may be configured to communicate and/or control a variety of RF devices associated with system 10. One such device may be an RF reader/programmer 84, which is discussed in further detail below with reference to
Each input tray 60, 62 may be configured to hold media, which may contain one or more identifiers. An identifier as described herein may therefore by understood to include, e.g., an RFID transponder, an RFID tag (e.g., active, passive and/or semi-passive), a “smart card”, a “smart label”, a microchip/antenna package, a “chipless” RFID tag, or any other programmable identification device. A “chipless” RFID tag (e.g., RF fibers) may not make use of any integrated circuit technology to store information. The tag may also use fibers or materials that reflect a portion of a reader's signal back and such unique return signal may then be used as for identification purposes.
It may therefore be appreciated that within each input tray, and as between input trays, the media may have different types of RFID tags, each intended to have, or having, its own programmed data which tag may then communicate via the use of radio waves. Furthermore, as noted above, the RFID tags may differ with respect to whether or not the tags are a passive tag, which may be understood as those tags that are ultimately powered by an RFID reader/programmer, or an active tag, in which case the RFID tag may have its own power source. Passive RFID tags may make use of a coiled antenna that may create a magnetic field using the energy provide by the reader's carrier signal. The RFID tags may also be a semi-passive tag, which have a power source (e.g. a laminar, flexible relatively low cost battery) which may be used for on tag sensing. The RFID tags may also be a read only tag that contains a unique programming that cannot be changed, or a write once read many (WORM) tag that may enable users to encode tags at the first instance of use wherein the code may then become locked. The RFID tags may also be a read/write tag that allows for updated or new information to be written to the tag. As discussed more fully below, printing system 10 may be configured to determine whether an RFID tag has been programmed successfully.
Within each input tray 60, 62, and as between input trays, the media may have a different number of tags. With respect to media having the same number of tags, the tags may be arranged at different locations. For example, one media type may have a single tag located in the center of the page near the leading edge. A different media type may have two tags, one in the upper left corner and the other at mid-page on the right side. It may also be appreciated that as between input trays, the nature of the media in which the RFID tags may be embedded may differ. For example, the media may be paper, label, cardstock, transparencies, etc. System 10 may be used to select a media input source (e.g., trays 60 and/or 62) for printing RFID media. Although only two input trays are shown, it is contemplated that any number of input sources may be used in accordance with the present disclosure.
Printing system 10 may also include at least one paper or other type of print media positioning sensor. In some cases, the paper positioning sensors may be optoelectronic devices, which have a light source that may be a light emitting diode (LED). This may allow for sensing the position of a sheet of paper or other print media and may provide a method of determining when the leading edge or trailing edge of a sheet of print media has reached a particular point along the media pathway. Furthermore, many different types of sensors may be used other than optoelectronic devices (e.g., a limit switch to detect whether or not the printer cover is closed) without departing from the principles of the present disclosure.
In some embodiments, radio frequency control circuitry 280 may attempt to read and/or program a tag embedded in the media and then note the success or failure of this attempt. The radio frequency control circuit 280 may then monitor or “listen” on its communications port to track the page's location as it moves through the printer. It is contemplated that controller 238 may be packaged into an aftermarket option that may be installed in a printer, such as printing device 10, without modification of the printer's other essential systems such as print engine 236 including the core print logic.
Printing device 10 may include test routines that may be capable of detecting certain failures or errors within printing device 10. Some of these errors may include, but are not limited to, an inability to communicate with RF reader/programmer 284, or an indication of a problem with antenna 282 forwarded from reader/programmer 284. Printing device 10 may include firmware having check routines that may validate the data passed down from a print job. These check routines may also be capable of detecting instances of data corruption or other internal errors. In an error is detected an error message may be presented to operator panel 290, which may present descriptive debug information for a repair technician.
In one exemplary embodiment, a technician may utilize a number of print jobs in order to test printing system 10. For example, two single-page print jobs written in any language understood by the printer (e.g., PCL) and a single sheet of RFID media may be used. The first print job supplied may contain a “write” command with programming data (e.g., a known data packet) to be forwarded to the identifier on the media. By forwarding it is to be understood that the programming data is sent to the identifier, but as contemplated herein, it remains to be evaluated as to whether or not such programming data is properly transferred to the identifier. Accordingly, the second supplied job may contain a “verify” command that contains the same known data packet. The technician may therefore first load the single sheet of media into an input source (e.g., input tray 60) and send the first print job. Printing system 10 may then feed the media from input trays 60 and/or 62 and attempt to program the identifier with the known data packet.
The technician may then remove the printed page from output bin (e.g., 50, 52, and/or 54) and return it to input tray 60 or 62. The second print job may then be sent. This print job may command printing device 10 to feed the printed page, read the data (if any) on the identifier, and compare it to the expected value encoded in the print job (i.e., programming data). Accordingly, if no data is read, or if the data read from the identifier does not correspond to the data that was programmed to the identifier an error code may be generated and noted on operator panel 290. It may therefore be appreciated that such an error code may be generated when the data read from the identifier indicates that it will not properly perform as intended and provide, e.g., the programmed identification data when utilized as, e.g., as RFID tag. Similarly, if the data read from the identifier corresponds to the data that was programmed to the identifier, such that the identifier can be expected to properly perform as intended and provide programmed identification data when utilized as, e.g., an RFID tag, an approval code may be generated and again sent to the operator panel.
Printing system 10 or 200 may also include a duplex unit 58. A duplex unit may be understood as a unit that may provide for multiple (e.g. at least two) passes of media through all or a portion of the printer before the media may be sent to an output tray. Accordingly, the two print jobs may be combined into a single print job with, e.g., the “write to identifier” occurring on the first pass through device 10 and the “read/verify” occurring on the second pass of the media through device 10. The presence of a duplex unit 58 may therefore simplify the procedure for the technician or end user.
Referring now to
In some embodiments, any one of the above referenced print jobs may be embedded in the printer firmware itself (similar to a demo page) and may be called up via a special diagnostic menu. Moreover, printing device 10, when configured in a diagnostic mode, may provide step-by-step instructions to the technician or end user, allowing such user to perform the test and possibly provide the results to remote test personnel. These instructions may be provided via a graphical user interface, such as operator panel 290.
It can now be appreciated that the system 10 and/or 200 may include a display, such as operator panel 90, which may show a graphical representation of a given sheet of media indicating whether or not an identifier has been properly programmed. For example, panel 90 may provide the technician with troubleshooting instructions or other information if the data from the identifier does not correspond to an expected value. Furthermore, the size and/or position of RFID tags present on the media of a given input source may be made visible using operator panel 90. Operator panel 90 may then provide a user with the option of selecting or canceling the particular print job. Various displays are therefore contemplated, such as, for example, an all-points addressable display panel.
As used in any embodiment described herein, “circuitry” may comprise, for example, singly or in any combination, hardwired circuitry, programmable circuitry, state machine circuitry, and/or firmware that stores instructions executed by programmable circuitry. It should be understood at the outset that any of the operations and/or operative components described in any embodiment herein may be implemented in software, firmware, hardwired circuitry and/or any combination thereof.
It should now also be clear that embodiments of the methods described above may be implemented in a computer program that may be stored on a storage medium having instructions to program a system to perform the methods. The storage medium may include, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs), compact disk rewritables (CD-RWs), and magneto-optical disks, semiconductor devices such as read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) such as dynamic and static RAMs, erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), flash memories, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions. Other embodiments may be implemented as software modules executed by a programmable control device.
It should be understood that modifications can be made to the disclosure in light of the above detailed description. The terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims. Rather, the scope of the disclosure is to be determined entirely by the following claims, which are to be construed in accordance with established doctrines of claim interpretation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6585154 | Ostrover et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6827279 | Teraura | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7268906 | Ruhl et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7495792 | Snowdon et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7594115 | Ikeda | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7649641 | Fujinuma | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20040044956 | Huang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050166094 | Blackwell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050218219 | Sano et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230479 | Chapman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070029386 | Jessup | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070236720 | Tamada et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080030746 | Matsunaga et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080123128 | Powers et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080144083 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |