Apparatus and method for file size estimation over broadcast networks

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9369771
  • Patent Number
    9,369,771
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 18, 2007
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 14, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
The apparatus and method for estimating the size of content being received before the actual transmission of the data utilizes Electronic Service Guide (ESG) information. The ESG information assists a client device in obtaining file information before the file is actually transmitted by the source of the same. In this manner, the power supply of the user device can be managed more efficiently and provide the user with the ability to make storage determinations at their user device before expending the power resources necessary to obtain (i.e., download) and store a particular file of interest to the user without requiring any user intervention.
Description

This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §365 of International Application PCT/US2007/025,810, filed 18 Dec. 2007, which was published in accordance with PCT Article 21(2) on 25 Jun. 2009, in English.


BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field


The present invention relate to broadcast networks. More particularly, they relate to estimating file size before receiving the same.


2. Description of Related Art


Broadcast technologies, such as DVB-H, enable delivery of data to low-power, portable client devices, which in turn enables content on demand services. In such services, content is continually received at a client and may be consumed by the end user immediately or consumed at a later time. In some cases, the amount of content that is stored is limited by the storage capacity of the client. When a service provides frequent content updates, it is desirable to enable quick storage and replacement of received data. In such services estimating the size of content being received before the actual transmission of the data can be helpful in replacing already stored content or deciding what content will be stored in the future.


SUMMARY

According to an aspect of the present principles, the method for file size estimation over a communication channel in a broadcast network includes estimating file size using broadcast schedule information before actually receiving the file, and determining whether or not to receive and store the file before downloading the same to a client device automatically and/or without requiring user intervention. This determination is based on user preferences stored in a user profile on the client device. The method can further include determining the bandwidth of the communication channel.


The file size estimation can be determined by deriving start and end times of the file from the broadcast schedule. In another implementation, the file size estimation uses electronic service guide (ESG) information relating to the file from a service provider.


The bandwidth determinations can be performed by estimation, or by obtaining previously known values for the bandwidth of the communication channel.


According to another aspect of the present principles, the apparatus includes a mobile client device having a memory contained therein and being configured to estimate a file size using broadcast scheduled information before actually receiving the file, and to automatically determine whether or not to receive and store the file before downloading the same to the memory of the device automatically and/or without requiring user intervention.


The mobile client device is further configured to determine the bandwidth of a communication channel over which the file is to be transmitted to the mobile device.


A user profile stored in the memory of the client device enables the client device to make the automatic determination without user requiring intervention.


According to another implementation of the present principles, the apparatus includes a mobile client device having a memory contained therein. The memory includes a computer program product comprising readable program code embodied thereon for use in operating the mobile client device. The program product includes program code for estimating a file size using broadcast schedule information before actually receiving the file, and program code for determining whether or not to receive and store the file before downloading the same to the mobile client device without user intervention. The client device further includes program code for determining storage space limitations on the client device using the estimated file size. This determination is made based on stored preferences in the user profile stored in the memory of the client device.


Other aspects and features of the present principles will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed solely for purposes of illustration and not as a definition of the limits of the present principles, for which reference should be made to the appended claims. It should be further understood that the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale and that, unless otherwise indicated, they are merely intended to conceptually illustrate the structures and procedures described herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings wherein like reference numerals denote similar components throughout the views:



FIG. 1 is block diagram of a bi-directional broadcast network scenario according to known implementations;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a uni-directional broadcast network according to known implementations;



FIG. 3 is diagrammatic representation of a clip and times at which the clip is to be broadcast;



FIG. 4 is diagrammatic representation of clip A to be broadcast and several clips stored in a client device;



FIG. 5 is flow diagram of the method for file size estimation according to an implementation of the present principles; and



FIG. 6a is block diagram of the method according to an implementation of the present principles;



FIG. 6b is a flow diagram of the method for file size estimation according to another implementation of the present principles.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

There are known methods to estimate the instantaneous bandwidth of a given channel. This is usually done on a bi-directional point-to-point network by measuring the amount of time it takes to acquire a known quantity of data. FIG. 1 shows an example of a bi-directional point to point network 100 where both the server 102 and client 106 are in bi-directional communication with each other via the network 104.


In most bi-directional client-server network architectures, a client requests a known quantity of data and records the start time and the end time of data transmission through a series of network packets going back and forth between the server and the client, to estimate channel capacity.



FIG. 2 shows an example of a uni-directional client/server architecture 200 where the server 202 transmits data to one or more clients 204a-c.


File Delivery can be performed using File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport (FLUTE) protocol. FLUTE is a protocol for multicast file delivery, and can be used to transmit data or content over uni-directional networks. A client can monitor the amount of data flowing at any particular time and use this information to estimate the channel capacity. In a constant capacity channel environment, this measurement could be done only once. In a variable channel, a best effort of the channel capacity (i.e., bandwidth) can be maintained and constantly updated.


A personalized broadcast video system provides a simple user interface for personalization, while efficiently using network bandwidth and minimizing receiver device battery usage. A user profile on a receiver device indicates the interests of the user. Individual clips to be broadcast are associated with flexible metadata tags, such as keywords, sent in an Electronic Service Guide (ESG). The ESG contains information about television programs scheduled for broadcast, and typically includes descriptive data, or metadata, about individual programs, such as the name of the program, a synopsis, actors, director, etc., as well as the scheduled time, date, duration and channel for broadcast.


The DVB-CBMS standard enables a service for broadcasting of multimedia content files, such as compressed video or audio files, using DVB-H. The DVB-H ESG provides a standardized ESG, which builds upon TV-Anytime or On-demand programming. In the DVB-H ESG, individual pieces of content are uniquely identified by the ContentID attribute of the content fragment.


In cases where a service of personalized broadcast video system is provided, content is continually broadcast and based on client preferences, content is received and stored. However, in such cases the client tends to be switched on all the time and hence results in inefficient power usage. Power management would be more efficient if the client only switched power on for reception of preferred content. In order to do this, however, the client has to decide which content can be saved based on local storage limitations, before the content is actually broadcast. According to an implementation of the present principles, this decision is established in the user profile preferences stored in the client device so that no user intervention is required.


The DVB-H ESG advertises the use of a file size parameter in the Acquisition fragment in the ComponentCharacteristic type named FileDownloadComponentCharacteristic under the Storage identifier. However, this only measures the file size as in megabytes and this granularity is not sufficient for providing advance notice of the content before actual broadcast.


As mentioned above, in unidirectional or broadcast networks there is no feedback from a client. The client only receives data that is broadcast. In such scenarios, the client can estimate bandwidth by passively monitoring the data packets. In order to make estimates of the file size of the content that is going to be broadcast, an estimated value of the bandwidth of the channel is required. This can be done by using a statistical table of sampled bandwidth over time or any other method of bandwidth estimation.


One example of estimating the bandwidth is by using the “b=” identifier specified in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) file. The SDP file contains a set of identifiers that associate with the acquisition of content.


In another example, a client could timestamp the start of a packet transmission and after a period of time, derive how much data was received. This would then help the client get an estimate of the bandwidth of the channel, where Bandwidth of the Channel=Number of bytes received/Time.


Another method of estimating bandwidth would be by using server provided data to the client. For example by using the DVB-H ESG specification, the Storage identifier can be used as a rough estimate of the file size of a content file going to be broadcast. This rough estimate, along with the start time and end time of broadcast from the already received schedule ESG fragment on the client device, can be used to estimate the bandwidth over an initial period of time. This is particularly useful in situations where the bandwidth of the channel is variable. The client device can use this method to estimate the approximate bandwidth. The client can also use this method to calculate the error in its estimates. For example once the whole file has been downloaded the, actual size of the file is known and this can be used to recalculate the bandwidth and hence adjust the estimating parameters so that future estimates are more accurate.


A file download service may be defined as a service that provides content for download in the form of files. These files are consumed at the receiver application and presented to the user. Providers of this service need to be sensitive about client device power and storage needs. Content is continually being broadcast and new content is stored on the client device while old ones are replaced. Replacing of old content must be time, as well as power sensitive. Knowing the content file sizes in advance, a client device can make intelligent choices when replacing content on the device and at the same time make better reception power management.


Once the bandwidth has been estimated the size of content to be broadcast can be estimated.


Referring to FIGS. 3 and 4, consider a scenario where Clip A is going to be broadcast at some time in the near future T1 and a client device 400 contains stored file content Clips B, C and D in an memory area 402 of the client device. The broadcast time of Clip A is available to the client by parsing the schedule ESG information it received from an earlier received transmission. The receiver (client device 400) has to make a decision on whether or not to store Clip A. For purposes of this example, we assume the Clips B, C and D together take up a good percentage of the storage space on the device. The memory area 402 in this example can be any type of known memory for storing content, and or programming information relating to the operation of the client device. In one implementation, the memory 402 contains the programming to implement the methods and processes of the present principles disclosed herein.


The client device 400 uses the size of Clip A to make a decision whether to store the clip. Using the estimated file size of Clip A, the client can make the decision in advance to either store or not store Clip A. For example without knowing the actual size of Clip A the client device would switch on at time T1 and receive whole of Clip A. After completion of the file download (at time T2), the file size of the clip is known. Based on this file size and other characteristics of the Clip A (e.g. keywords etc.), the client device can either store Clip A and replace some existing content (Clip B, C and D) or discard Clip A. Discarding Clip A after having used the power to receive it, is wasteful in terms of power usage and hence reduces battery life.


Using the estimated file size of Clip A, the client device can make the decision in advance to either store or not store Clip A. The device does not have to be switched on during the broadcast of Clip A if it decides it doesn't need to store the clip, thereby reducing the power usage of the device by shutting off its reception components for that period.


Referring to FIG. 5, there is shown the method 500 where the reception module (or client device) needs to be switched on regardless of whether the content was going to be stored or not. This is primarily due to the fact that the reception module 504 is started immediately after the ESG schedule is received 502. The content is received (506), and a determination is made (508) whether the receiving of the content has ended. When the content is fully received, the downloaded size is calculated 510, and the client device decides whether to store the content (512). If no, the received content is deleted (514) and the device returns to the receive schedule state. If yes, the received content is stored (516) and the device returns to the receive schedule state. As mentioned above, this method requires the client or user device to be powered on and in reception mode at all times, and may result in an inefficient use of battery power, especially when the user determines to delete the received content, after complete reception.



FIG. 6a shows the method 600 according to an implementation of the present principles, where power usage at the client device is more efficiently managed. Initially, the bandwidth of the communication channel is determined (602). As mentioned above, this determination can be either an actual, known BW, or can be estimated using any suitable known method for estimating the bandwidth of the channel. Once the bandwidth is known, the file (content) size can be estimated (604) using the previously received ESG information. When the file size has been determined, or estimated, the smart client device can determine (606) whether or not to download (store) the file (content) at the client device without requiring the user's intervention. This determination is made base on the user preferences previously established by the user in the user profile stored in the memory of the client device.



FIG. 6b shows a more detailed block diagram of steps 604 and 606 of FIG. 6a. Initially the schedule ESG is received 608. The received schedule list is iterated over or reviewed for new future content broadcasts (610). The file size is then calculated (or estimated) from the schedule information using the broadcast start and stop times (612). With this information, the client device can be presented with the decision to store, or not store the content (606). If the client device says “yes”, then the reception module is powered on, and reception of the new content is started (614). The client device starts receiving the content 616, and once all the content is received (618), the content is stored 620 and the process returns to the beginning. The client device will automatically power down upon completion of the process. Generally speaking, the client device will power down if the device is not active. If the client device is in an active state, it will power down its receiving hardware components.


In accordance with one aspect of the present principles, the steps in calculating the file size over a varying or constant bandwidth channel are: From ESG:

Duration of Broadcast=EndBroadcastTime−StartBroadcastTime.
File Size=Bandwidth of Channel*Duration of Broadcast.


It is to be understood that the present principles may be implemented in various forms of hardware, software, firmware, special purpose processors, or a combination thereof. Preferably, the present principles may be implemented as a combination of hardware and software. Moreover, the software is preferably implemented as an application program tangibly embodied on a program storage device. The application program may be uploaded to, and executed by, a machine comprising any suitable architecture. Preferably, the machine is implemented on a computer platform having hardware such as one or more central processing units (CPU), a random access memory (RAM), and input/output (I/O) interface(s). The computer platform also includes an operating system and microinstruction code. The various processes and functions described herein may either be part of the microinstruction code or part of the application program (or a combination thereof) that is executed via the operating system. In addition, various other peripheral devices may be connected to the computer platform such as an additional data storage device and a printing device.


It is to be further understood that, because some of the constituent system components and method steps depicted in the accompanying Figures are preferably implemented in software, the actual connections between the system components (or the process steps) may differ depending upon the manner in which the present principles is programmed. Given the teachings herein, one of ordinary skill in the related art will be able to contemplate these and similar implementations or configurations of the present principles.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving an electronic service guide (ESG) data from a server, said ESG data including a schedule list;determining a bandwidth of a communication channel between said server and a client, said client including a reception module for storing a broadcast content from said server;iterating over said schedule list for a new broadcast content;estimating a size of said new content from said determined bandwidth and said schedule list, said schedule list including start and stop times of said new content;determining whether to provide an operating power to said reception module for storing said new content at said client based upon said estimated size of said new content and a preference pre-provided by a user; andremoving said operating power from said reception module after said new content is stored when said operating power is provided to said reception module.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: determining a storage space limitation of said client based upon said estimated size of said new content, whereinsaid preference includes storing said new content by replacing an existing content on said client.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: measuring an actual size of said new content after said new content is stored;adjusting a parameter for said bandwidth determination step in accordance with said actual size of said new content.
  • 4. An apparatus comprising: a client having a communication channel with a server via a network;a memory included in said client;a reception module included in said client operative to store a broadcast content from said server to said memory;said client operative to:receive an electronic service guide (ESG) data from said server, said ESG data including a schedule list;determine a bandwidth of said communication channel between said server and said client;
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said client is operative to determine a storage space limitation of said memory based upon said estimated size of said new content, andsaid preference includes storing said new content by replacing an existing content on said memory.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said client is operative to measure an actual size of said new content after said new content is stored, andsaid client is operative to adjust a parameter for said bandwidth determination in accordance with said actual size of said new content.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2007/025810 12/18/2007 WO 00 6/15/2010
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2009/078839 6/25/2009 WO A
US Referenced Citations (138)
Number Name Date Kind
5202755 Yang et al. Apr 1993 A
5627970 Keshav May 1997 A
5675384 Ramamurthy et al. Oct 1997 A
5802106 Packer Sep 1998 A
5892915 Duso et al. Apr 1999 A
5974503 Venkatesh et al. Oct 1999 A
5987621 Duso et al. Nov 1999 A
6014694 Aharoni et al. Jan 2000 A
6026082 Astrin Feb 2000 A
6230200 Forecast et al. May 2001 B1
6275990 Dapper et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289382 Bowman-Amuah Sep 2001 B1
6298456 O'Neil et al. Oct 2001 B1
6332163 Bowman-Amuah Dec 2001 B1
6339832 Bowman-Amuah Jan 2002 B1
6356945 Shaw et al. Mar 2002 B1
6434568 Bowman-Amuah Aug 2002 B1
6434628 Bowman-Amuah Aug 2002 B1
6438594 Bowman-Amuah Aug 2002 B1
6442748 Bowman-Amuah Aug 2002 B1
6473794 Guheen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477580 Bowman-Amuah Nov 2002 B1
6477665 Bowman-Amuah Nov 2002 B1
6496850 Bowman-Amuah Dec 2002 B1
6502213 Bowman-Amuah Dec 2002 B1
6507872 Geshwind Jan 2003 B1
6519571 Guheen et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529909 Bowman-Amuah Mar 2003 B1
6529948 Bowman-Amuah Mar 2003 B1
6536037 Guheen et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539396 Bowman-Amuah Mar 2003 B1
6549949 Bowman-Amuah Apr 2003 B1
6550057 Bowman-Amuah Apr 2003 B1
6571282 Bowman-Amuah May 2003 B1
6578068 Bowman-Amuah Jun 2003 B1
6601192 Bowman-Amuah Jul 2003 B1
6601234 Bowman-Amuah Jul 2003 B1
6606660 Bowman-Amuah Aug 2003 B1
6611812 Hurtado et al. Aug 2003 B2
6615166 Guheen et al. Sep 2003 B1
6615199 Bowman-Amuah Sep 2003 B1
6615253 Bowman-Amuah Sep 2003 B1
6625750 Duso et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636242 Bowman-Amuah Oct 2003 B2
6640238 Bowman-Amuah Oct 2003 B1
6640244 Bowman-Amuah Oct 2003 B1
6640249 Bowman-Amuah Oct 2003 B1
6697365 Messenger Feb 2004 B1
6715145 Bowman-Amuah Mar 2004 B1
6721437 Ezaki et al. Apr 2004 B1
6721713 Guheen et al. Apr 2004 B1
6725267 Hoang Apr 2004 B1
6742015 Bowman-Amuah May 2004 B1
6834110 Marconcini et al. Dec 2004 B1
6842906 Bowman-Amuah Jan 2005 B1
6901051 Hou et al. May 2005 B1
6957186 Guheen et al. Oct 2005 B1
6983371 Hurtado et al. Jan 2006 B1
7110984 Spagna et al. Sep 2006 B1
7149698 Guheen et al. Dec 2006 B2
7165041 Guheen et al. Jan 2007 B1
7177429 Moskowitz et al. Feb 2007 B2
7188085 Pelletier Mar 2007 B2
7213005 Mourad et al. May 2007 B2
7219145 Chmaytelli et al. May 2007 B2
7228437 Spagna et al. Jun 2007 B2
7260309 Gutta Aug 2007 B2
7269564 Milsted et al. Sep 2007 B1
7310823 Okamoto et al. Dec 2007 B2
7478206 Nakamura et al. Jan 2009 B2
7568079 Horiuchi et al. Jul 2009 B2
8081955 Davis et al. Dec 2011 B2
8433181 Jeong et al. Apr 2013 B2
20010044835 Schober et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020010684 Moskowitz Jan 2002 A1
20020013156 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020026501 Hoang Feb 2002 A1
20020078357 Breukers et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020175998 Hoang Nov 2002 A1
20030007507 Rajwan et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030051249 Hoang Mar 2003 A1
20030058277 Bowman-Amuah Mar 2003 A1
20030105718 Hurtado et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135464 Mourad et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030195863 Marsh Oct 2003 A1
20030225777 Marsh Dec 2003 A1
20030229549 Wolinsky et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003413 Boston et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040034712 Rajwan et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040045030 Reynolds et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040052504 Yamada et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040091235 Gutta May 2004 A1
20040092228 Force et al. May 2004 A1
20041010712 Guheen et al. Jun 2004
20040148631 Zubowicz Jul 2004 A1
20040163121 Hyun Aug 2004 A1
20040250291 Rao et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050135779 Garrison et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144284 Ludwig et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050229222 Relan et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050238315 Kataoka Oct 2005 A1
20050240756 Mayer Oct 2005 A1
20050259682 Yosef et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050289616 Horiuchi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289635 Nakamura et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060047775 Bruck et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053077 Mourad et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064716 Sull et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060085343 Lisanke et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095792 Hurtado et al. May 2006 A1
20060095944 Demircin et al. May 2006 A1
20060107289 Deyonker et al. May 2006 A1
20060159109 Lamkin et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161635 Lamkin et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161949 Tsukamoto Jul 2006 A1
20060184977 Mueller et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060218218 Ganesan et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060242091 Jansky Oct 2006 A1
20060242672 Narayanan et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060285508 Vermola et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070016927 Robey et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070104457 Jeong et al. May 2007 A1
20070128899 Mayer Jun 2007 A1
20070130023 Wolinsky et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070130589 Davis et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070153731 Fine et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070153910 Levett Jul 2007 A1
20070192482 Smith et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201823 Kang Aug 2007 A1
20070211720 Fuchs et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070237402 Dekel et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080040760 Cho et al. Feb 2008 A1
20090204992 Boyce et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100130122 Sridhar et al. May 2010 A1
20100138870 Anthru et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100138871 Anthru et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100257572 Sridhar et al. Oct 2010 A1
20130219440 Sridhar et al. Aug 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (94)
Number Date Country
1647517 Jul 2005 CN
1708985 Dec 2005 CN
1723474 Jan 2006 CN
1751470 Mar 2006 CN
1077398 Feb 2001 EP
1107137 Jun 2001 EP
1487204 Dec 2004 EP
1622341 Feb 2006 EP
1693981 Aug 2006 EP
1909283 Apr 2008 EP
2405557 Mar 2005 GB
2434463 Jul 2007 GB
8022653 Jan 1996 JP
2000228081 Aug 2000 JP
2003046974 Feb 2003 JP
2003085880 Mar 2003 JP
2004048718 Feb 2004 JP
2004516693 Jun 2004 JP
2004220696 Aug 2004 JP
2004-533781 Nov 2004 JP
2004350316 Dec 2004 JP
2005-346824 Dec 2005 JP
2006053633 Feb 2006 JP
2006054022 Feb 2006 JP
2006505994 Feb 2006 JP
2006115224 Apr 2006 JP
2006129265 May 2006 JP
2007110395 Apr 2007 JP
2007274066 Oct 2007 JP
2007274443 Oct 2007 JP
2007312365 Nov 2007 JP
20010020498 Mar 2001 KR
20040061254 Jul 2004 KR
20070063086 Jun 2007 KR
WO 9401824 Jan 1994 WO
WO9900984 Jan 1999 WO
WO 0007314 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0051310 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0073928 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0073929 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0073930 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0073955 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0073956 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0073957 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0073958 Dec 2000 WO
WO0073956 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0116668 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116704 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116705 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116706 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116723 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116724 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116726 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116727 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116728 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116729 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116733 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116734 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116735 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0116739 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0117139 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0117194 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0117195 Mar 2001 WO
WO0116729 Mar 2001 WO
WO0116733 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0143026 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0146846 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0157667 Aug 2001 WO
WO0189176 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0193060 Dec 2001 WO
WO0203682 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0211364 Feb 2002 WO
WO0211364 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0239744 May 2002 WO
WO 02087246 Oct 2002 WO
02104028 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03017553 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03027876 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03043204 May 2003 WO
WO 03048894 Jun 2003 WO
WO2004045104 May 2004 WO
WO2004053757 Jun 2004 WO
WO2004063892 Jul 2004 WO
WO2004107747 Dec 2004 WO
WO2005015913 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005022791 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005032026 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2006066052 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2007078252 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007078253 Jul 2007 WO
WO2008033136 Mar 2008 WO
WO2008147367 Dec 2008 WO
WO2009020492 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009020493 Feb 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (25)
Entry
Search Report copy—dtd Sep. 18, 2008.
P.Kjeldsberg et al.: “Data Dependency Size Estimation for Use in Memory Optimization” IEEE Trans. on Computer Aided Design of Integrated Circuits & Sys., vol. 22, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 908-921.
Q.Hu et al.: “A Comparison of Indexing Methods for Data Broadcast on the Air”, IEEE Publication, Published Jan. 21-23, 1998, pp. 1-4.
Lo et al.: “Optimal Index and Data Allocation in Multiple Broadcast Channels”, Data Engineering Conference Publication Feb. 29-Mar. 3, 200, pp. 293-302.
A. Salkintzis et al.: “An Outband Paging Protocol for Energy Efficient Mobile Communications”; IEEETransactions on Broadcasting Sep. 2002, vol. 48, Issue 3. pp. 246-256.
Handley, M., et al., “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” RFC 4566, The Internet Society, Jul. 2006, pp. 1-49.
Paila, T., et al., “Flute—File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport,”, RFC 3926, Oct. 2004, pp. 1-35.
IP Datacast over DVB-H: Electronic Service Guide (ESG), “DVB Digital Video Broadcasting”, DVB Document A099, Nov. 2005, 89 pgs.
The TV-Anytime Forum, “Specification Series: S-3 On: Metadata (Normative) Part A: Metadata Schemas,” SP003v13 Part A, Dec. 15, 2002, 161 pgs.
Wikipedia, “Electronic Program Guide,” No date (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPG, accessed Aug. 16, 2013).
International Search Report for PCT/US2007/025810 dated Sep. 10, 2008.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/310,506 dated Mar. 22, 2012.
Tong et al.:“Blind and Semiblind Channel Equalization for Wireless Broadcast Channels,” Cornell University Itheca, NY, IEEE, Oct. 2, 2007, p. 595.
Sooncheon et al., “An Effective Resource Management for Variable Bit Rate Video-On-Demand Server,” 1997 IEEE, Sep. 1, 1997.
Pu et al., “Fine-Grain Adaptive Compression in Dynamically Variable Networks,” Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICSCS'05), 2005 IEEE, Jun. 6, 2005.
Gubbi, “Multimedia Streams and Quality of Service in the Next Generation Wireless Home,” 1999 IEEE, Nov. 15, 1999.
Knappmeyer et al., “Adapative Data Scheduling for Mobile Carousel Services”, IEEE Publication. Apr. 22, 2007.
Non-final rejection dated Mar. 23, 2012.
WIPO SR dated Sep. 24, 2008.
SR Eng TR dated Jul. 9, 2012.
SR original dated Jul. 9, 2012.
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/852,290 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 5, 2014.
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/852,290 Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 10, 2014.
US DIV Notice of Allowance for Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/852,290 dated Oct. 27, 2015.
Jean-Pierre Evain et al., “TV-Anytime Phase 1—a decisive milestone in open standards for Personal Video recorders,” EBU Technical Review, Jul. 2003.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100278178 A1 Nov 2010 US