In the drilling and completion industry it is known that operations affecting an earth formation including operations such as fracturing, or “fracing”, operations can be beneficial for a number of reasons. In some cases, for example, fracturing operations help to stimulate the production of hydrocarbons from earth formations. In such operations, portions of the formation are fractured to increase fluid flow from the formation into a borehole. Fracturing generally includes isolating a portion of the borehole and pressurizing fluid therein to a pressure sufficient to cause a fracture in the formation. Boreholes may include both vertical and horizontal sections, such as long horizontal wells commonly used in shale gas and other tight formations. In recent years many methods have been used to allow multiple fractures to be induced along the length of a lateral section.
Fracturing techniques and systems allow borehole sections to be isolated and fractured at discrete intervals. However, fractures generally cannot be initiated at defined points, but rather the fractures most likely run from unknown points within the desired interval. These points are likely to be points of weakness or superimposed stress, such as stress caused by isolation packers. If an isolation packer causes a high stress point or a fracture from an adjacent interval has weakened the formation near the isolation packer, the new fracture may initiate in close proximity to an adjacent fracture zone. This can cause adjacent fractures to interconnect or run parallel closely together, likely resulting in a lower productivity index, resulting in much of the interval between the packers being left unfractured and less productive than planned.
A method of fracturing an earth formation includes: isolating a section of a borehole in the earth formation; introducing a fluid into the isolated section and pressurizing the isolated section from a first pressure to a second pressure; introducing a stress concentration to a borehole wall at least one location in the isolated section when the fluid is at the second pressure or during the pressurization; and initiating a hydraulic fracture in the earth formation at the at least one location.
An apparatus for fracturing in an earth formation includes: an isolation assembly configured to isolate a section of a borehole in the earth formation; a fracturing assembly configured to be disposed at the isolated section, the fracturing assembly in fluid communication with a fluid source and including at least one passage to introduce fluid into the isolated section, the fracturing assembly configured to introduce a fluid into the isolated section and pressurize the isolated section from a first pressure to at least a fracture pressure to initiate a hydraulic fracture in the earth formation; and at least one perforation device disposable at a selected location within the isolated section and configured to introduce a stress concentration to a borehole wall at least one location in the isolated section when the fluid is at the selected pressure or during the pressurization.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
The apparatuses, systems and methods described herein provide for fracturing an earth formation at a controlled location and/or direction. The method includes generating a controlled formation stress concentration or stress riser coupled with initiating a hydraulic fracture in the formation. The stress riser can be controlled at both location and time relative to the hydraulic fracturing to initiate formation of the fracture at a selected location of a borehole wall and in a desired direction. In one embodiment, the system includes one or more perforation devices such as shaped charges that are configured to be fired or otherwise actuated to create a perforation in the borehole wall at the same time that a hydraulic pressure has been increased or is being increased to an elevated pressure relative to the borehole pressure. Examples of the elevated pressure include a fracture pressure, a leak-off pressure and other desired hydraulic pressures related to the fracture pressure. The systems and methods generate a stress riser or stress concentration at one or more selected locations that cause a fracture to initiate at the selected locations when a fracture process is performed.
Referring to
The tool 20 includes a hydraulic fracturing assembly 22, such as a fracture or “frac” sleeve device, and a perforation assembly 24. The perforation assembly 24 may be any device or tool configured to generate a stress concentration or otherwise create a weak point or weak region at a localized portion of the borehole wall. Examples of the perforation assembly 24 include shaped charges, torches, projectiles and other devices for perforating the borehole wall and/or casing.
In one embodiment, the system 10 includes one or more isolation assemblies 26 configured to isolate a portion of the borehole 12. As referred to herein, an “isolated portion” or “isolated section” refers to a portion or section of the borehole 12 that is at least substantially isolated with respect to fluid pressure from the rest of the borehole 12. In one embodiment, the isolation assembly 26 is a packer sub or other component that includes one or more packers. A “fluid” refers to any flowable substance such as water, oil or other liquids, air, and flowable solids such as sand.
One or more of the tool 20, the fracturing assembly 22, the perforation assembly 24 and/or isolation assembly 26 may include suitable electronics or processors configured to communicate with a surface processing unit 28 and/or control the respective tool or assembly.
In the embodiment of
The fracturing assembly 22, in one embodiment, includes a fracing sleeve or other housing 38 that includes including one or more passages or holes 40 and a valve assembly 42 such as a ball seat valve that is actuated to allow fracing fluid or other downhole fluid to be pumped or otherwise introduced into the isolated section 34. The fracing fluid may be any type of fluid, such as water, brine, hydrocarbon fluid, alcohol, guar based fracturing fluids, cellulosic polymeric compounds, gels, wellbore fluid and others.
In one embodiment, the system 10 includes a pumping mechanism such as one or more pumping units 44. The pumping units 44 are disposed in fluid communication with the fluid conduit 30 at a downhole and/or surface location. In one embodiment, the pumping unit 44 includes an electric motor or pump motor at the surface or downhole. The pumping unit 44 can be used to pressurize fluid in the isolated section 34 to initiate a fracture. In addition, the pumping unit 44 can be used to inflate the packers 32 via, for example, the packer valve(s) 36.
The perforation assembly 24 includes a housing such as a perforating sub, or may include one or more perforation devices 46 disposed on the frac sleeve 38 or other downhole component and configured to be located at the isolated section 34. In the embodiment shown in
Referring to
In the first stage 61, the tool 20 is deployed downhole and advanced along the borehole 14 to a desired position, such as via a production string 12 or a wireline. The desired position is a depth or point along the borehole 14 at which a fracture is desired to be initiated. The desired point could be selected, for example, from previous formation evaluation measurements, such as logs, mineralogy studies and/or models generated from logging-while-drilling (LWD) or wireline measurements so that the stress risers and packers are placed at optimum locations.
In the second stage 62, when the fracturing assembly 22 and the perforation devices 46 are located at a desired position, the packers 32 (or other isolation assembly 26) are actuated to isolate a section 34 of the borehole 14. For example, packer valves 36 are opened and downhole fluid is diverted from the fluid conduit 30 to inflate the packers 32.
In the third stage 63, fluid is introduced into the isolated section 34 via, for example, the pumping unit 44, and the isolated section 34 is pressurized to a desired pressure. The desired pressure may be a fracture pressure, a pressure above the fracture pressure, or any other pressures related to the fracture pressure. A fracture pressure is a pressure that is at least sufficient to cause a crack or fracture to form in the formation 16. In one embodiment, the fracture pressure is at least approximately known from past fracturing experience and/or through geomechanical modeling. In some embodiments, the isolated section 34 is pressurized to one or more intermediate pressures prior to pressurizing the isolated section 34 to the fracture pressure. For example, the fluid pressure in the isolated section 34 can be raised to a mini-frac or leak-off pressure and held substantially constant.
The “mini-frac” pressure is a pressure typically used during a mini-frac treatment, which is a small fracturing treatment performed before the main hydraulic fracturing treatment to acquire job design and execution data and confirm the predicted response of the treatment interval. Mini-frac procedures can be used to provide design data from the parameters associated with the injection of fluids and the subsequent pressure decline.
The “leak-off” pressure is a pressure exerted on a formation that is sufficient to cause fluid to be forced into the formation, and is generally lower than the fracture pressure. The leak-off pressure is often associated with a leak-off test, which is a test to determine the strength or fracture pressure of a formation. During the test, the well is shut in and fluid is pumped into the borehole to gradually increase the pressure that the formation experiences. At some pressure (the leak-off pressure), fluid will enter the formation, or leak off, either moving through permeable paths in the rock or by creating a space by fracturing the rock. Results of a leak-off test can be used to determine the maximum pressure or mud weight that may be applied to the well during drilling operations.
In the fourth stage 64, when the pressure in the isolated section 34 is at the desired pressure (e.g., at or above the fracture pressure), or during pressurization of the isolated section 34 (e.g., when the pressure is increasing at a desired rate), the perforation devices 46 are actuated to perforate the borehole wall at the desired location and direction. In one example, the perforation devices 46 are directed charges that are actuated, for example, via a detonation cord. The perforation devices 46 may be manually actuated by a user at the surface or automatically actuated via suitable electronics based on pressure measurements taken in the isolated section 34, fluid flow rates and/or pumping rates. In one embodiment, multiple perforation devices 46 are positioned circumferentially and radially oriented to produce the “knife cut” which produces a hoop stress that is based upon a ratio of the borehole diameter to the knife cut diameter. The perforation devices 46 may be configured to control the hoop stress on the borehole wall by varying the radial position of the devices 46 in the borehole and/or the strength of the perforation devices 46.
The combination of the increased pressure and perforation creates a stress riser at the desired location and in the desired direction which creates an initiation point from which the fracture can initiate and can also help control the direction along which the fracture may propagate. When the pressure within the stress riser region exceeds the fracturing pressure, fractures are created adjacent the borehole 14 that extend into the earth formation 16 and enhance hydrocarbon production from the formation 16 into the borehole 14. By creating the pressure riser, the fracture is initiated at or near the location or locations that the perforation was formed due to the combination of fluid pressure and the perforation.
In one embodiment, the isolated section pressure is rapidly increased to a desired pressure, such as the fracture pressure or a pressure higher than the fracture pressure, and the perforation devices 46 are actuated at or near the point in time at which the desired pressure is reached. In one embodiment, the isolated section pressure is increased to the desired pressure, held substantially constant, and the perforation devices 46 are actuated at the desired pressure.
In one embodiment, the timing of the stress riser creation and the fracture initiation are synchronized by synchronizing pressurization and perforation. For example, the perforation devices 46 are actuated at least substantially concurrently with the fluid pressure reaching the fracture pressure or other desired pressure in the isolated section 34. In other embodiments, a phased delay is utilized between pressurization and perforation, so that a selected period of time elapses between realization of the fracture pressure (or other desired pressure) and actuation of the perforation devices 46 to perforate the borehole wall. In phased embodiments, the perforation devices 46 may be actuated prior to or after achieving the desired pressurization.
In the fifth stage 65, the normal fracturing process is followed to complete the fracturing operation at the selected location. For example, fluid continues to be pumped into the fracture at desired pressures to extend the fracture. In one embodiment, a proppant such as sand is subsequently pumped into the fracture to keep the fracture open and allow formation hydrocarbons to flow into the borehole 14.
The method 60 may be repeated for each location (e.g., each lateral section) having a pre-placed perforation device 46, or the tool 20 may be moved to one or more additional depths or locations along the borehole 14 and the method 60 repeated for each depth or location.
Additional examples of the method 60 are described herein. In a first example, the pressure in the isolated section 34 is increased to the leak-off point, the pressure is then optionally held until perforation devices 46 and/or pumping units 44 are ready, and pumping is rapidly increased to fracture rates. The perforation devices 46 are manually actuated, such as via an electric trigger, to actuate the perforation devices 46 while the pressure is being increased from the leak-off point or upon reaching at least the fracture pressure.
In another example, the pressure in the isolated section 34 is increased to the leak-off point, the pressure is then optionally held until perforation devices 46 and/or pumping units are ready, and pumping is rapidly increased to fracture rates and the perforation devices 46 are automatically initiated from within a self-contained and powered perforation module 24 for the selected location. The module 24 can be programmed so that perforation is initiated based on a signal from the pumping unit 44 and/or based on flow rate, pressure or rates of pressure change measured by the module 24 or communicated to the module from a remote location. In a further example, once the leak off pressure is reached, a high and short pressure hold acts as a pre-trigger to the module 24, followed by a rapid time based rise in pressure that acts as a trigger point that causes the module 24 to fire or otherwise actuate the perforation devices 46.
The systems and methods described herein provide various advantages over existing processing methods and devices. For example, the systems and methods allow formation fractures to be initiated at precisely controlled locations and/or directions. Causing the fracture to initiate at a particular point potentially gives a better production return than allowing the fracture to self-initiate, since the fracture can be accurately initiated at identified pay zones and identified production zones within a formation are more accurately fractured to yield greater production.
The systems and methods are able to cause the fracture to initiate at a defined point, and are thereby able to avoid allowing the fracture to initiate from other points of weakness or superimposed stress such as an isolation packer. If the isolation packer causes a high stress point or the fracture from the adjacent interval weakened the formation near the isolation packer, it is likely that the new fracture my initiate in close proximity to the previous or run toward and connect with the previous fracture. Where these adjacent fractures to interconnect or run parallel closely together, it is likely that a lower productivity index would result and most of the interval between the packers for the section of lateral of interest would be left unfractured and less productive than planned. Controlling the initiation point as described herein can avoid this condition.
In support of the teachings herein, various analyses and/or analytical components may be used, including digital and/or analog systems. The system may have components such as a processor, storage media, memory, input, output, communications link (wired, wireless, pulsed mud, optical or other), user interfaces, software programs, signal processors (digital or analog) and other such components (such as resistors, capacitors, inductors and others) to provide for operation and analyses of the apparatus and methods disclosed herein in any of several manners well-appreciated in the art. It is considered that these teachings may be, but need not be, implemented in conjunction with a set of computer executable instructions stored on a computer readable medium, including memory (ROMs, RAMs), optical (CD-ROMs), or magnetic (disks, hard drives), or any other type that when executed causes a computer to implement the method of the present invention. These instructions may provide for equipment operation, control, data collection and analysis and other functions deemed relevant by a system designer, owner, user or other such personnel, in addition to the functions described in this disclosure.
One skilled in the art will recognize that the various components or technologies may provide certain necessary or beneficial functionality or features. Accordingly, these functions and features as may be needed in support of the appended claims and variations thereof, are recognized as being inherently included as a part of the teachings herein and a part of the invention disclosed.
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications will be appreciated by those skilled in the art to adapt a particular instrument, situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5131472 | Dees et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
3011551 | Young | Sep 1996 | A |
5551344 | Couet et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5706895 | Sydansk | Jan 1998 | A |
5765642 | Surjaatmadja | Jun 1998 | A |
6055213 | Rubbo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6962203 | Funchess | Nov 2005 | B2 |
20020053434 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030062160 | Boney et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075326 | Ebinger | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040188093 | Funchess | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060027123 | Van Dyk et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20090071651 | Patel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100000727 | Webb et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100292108 | Kakadjian et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Travis Cavender et all, “Interfacing Fracturing and Sand Control Completion Strategies into Multilateral Technology; Considerations and Solutions”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 80477; Apr. 15, 2003. |
T.P. Lhomme et al., “Experimental Study of Hydraulic Fracture Initiation in Colton Sandstone”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. SPE/ISRM 78187, Oct. 20, 2002. |
Delano Lougheide et al., “Horizontal Gravel Packs Successfully Deployed in Trinidad's First Multilateral Well-Planning, Implementation, and Remedial Strategies”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 90220, Sep. 26, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120067582 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |