This application includes the following appendices after the claims. These appendices are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes:
1. Appendix A entitled “Validity of Using Tri-Axial Accelerometers to Measure Human Movement-Part I: Posture and Movement Detection,” and
2. Appendix B entitled “Validity of Using Tri-Axial Accelerometers to Measure Human Movement-Part II: Step Counts at a Wide Range of Gait Velocities.”
The invention relates generally to apparatus and methods for indentifying movement in a body, such as physical activity in a human patient.
Devices and methods for identifying and quantifying body position and movement are generally known. There remains, however, a continuing need for improved devices of these types. In particular, there is a need for apparatus and methods capable of accurately identifying relatively slow speed movement.
Embodiments of the invention include methods for operating a processing system to generate accurate information representative of movement of a body. On embodiment includes receiving one or more kinematic or movement signals representative of movement of the body at the processing system, continuous wavelet transform processing the one or more movement signals by the processing system to generate continuous wavelet transform data, and determining by the processing system whether the body is moving as a function of the continuous wavelet transform data. Another embodiment includes receiving one or more kinematic or movement signals representative of movement of the body at the processing system, processing the movement signals by the processing system to generate one or more step threshold levels representative of steps, and processing the movement signals by the processing system, including comparing the movement signals to the one or more step threshold levels, to identify patient steps.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, accurate detection of postural transitions, walking, and jogging is determined from body accelerations using continuous wavelet transforms. Using continuous wavelet transform processing, it is possible to determine the changing frequency content over time on a non-stationary signal. By representing the signal as a sum of a scaled and time shifted mother wavelet, continuous wavelet transforms can provide utility in obtaining transition and gait pattern information. Continuous wavelet transforms (CWT) enhance the ability of system 10 to identify movement at all speeds, including slow walking instants (e.g., speeds less than about 1.0 m/sec.).
The gravitational and bodily motion components of the acceleration or other kinematic or movement signal are used to identify all possible outcome configurations. The bodily motion component was utilized in determining static versus dynamic activity, with signal magnitude area (SMA) values above a first threshold level (e.g., 0.135 g) identified as being representative of movement. The signal magnitude area was computed over each 1 sec. window (t) across all three orthogonal axes (ax, ay, az).
Of those seconds of data identified as non-movement (e.g., those seconds below the first threshold level), a continuous wavelet transform was utilized to process the movement signals. The Daubechies 4 Mother Wavelet algorithm was applied to data received from a waist sensor in one embodiment of the invention. Other algorithms and movement signals can be used in other embodiments. Data which fell within a predetermined frequency range (e.g., 0.1-2.0 Hz) was further identified as movement. In other embodiments, movement is identified by evaluating whether the scaling value exceeds a threshold (e.g., 1.5) over a predetermined time period (e.g., about 1 sec.). In still other embodiments, movement is identified when the data content meets both the frequency and scaling value criteria.
In another embodiment of the invention, which can be implemented alone or in combination with the continuous wavelet transform embodiment described above, patient steps can be accurately identified and counted at all speeds, including at relatively slow speeds, in accordance with an adaptive thresholding algorithm. During identified walking and jogging movement segments, the anteroposterior accelerations or other movement signals from sensors 12 such as, for example, those on the right and left ankles, can be filtered (e.g., using a low-pass butterworth filter with a cut-off frequency of 6 Hz) and analyzed using a peak detection method with adaptive thresholds to calculate the number of steps taken. The adaptive thresholds for peak detection allow for a greater accuracy in the detection of steps at different walking speeds. For each continuous segment of data classified as walking or jogging, adaptive thresholds to detect heel-strike points were calculated, and optionally periodically updated. Local minimum peaks of the anteroposterior acceleration signal (αAP) were considered valid heel strike points (e.g., measurement signals determined or identified as being representative of steps) if their magnitudes were greater than a first step threshold value or level. In embodiments, the first threshold (e.g., th1 below) can be the mean of the anteroposterior acceleration signal (
th
1=0.8×(1/N)×Σt=1N(αAP
In other embodiments, valid heel strike points (i.e., given movement signal portions) are determined as a function of a second step threshold level if the movement signal representative of a previous step had a preceding maximum whose magnitude is greater than the second step level threshold, where the second threshold level is greater by a predetermined value or amount (e.g., th2 below) than the first step threshold.
th
2=0.6×max(αAP)
Still other embodiments identify steps using both the first and second threshold levels (i.e., local minimum peaks of the given anteroposterior acceleration signal). Heel strike points are considered valid if their magnitudes were greater than the first step threshold level and had a preceding maximum whose magnitude was at least the predetermined amount greater than the minimum.
In addition to adaptive acceleration thresholds, adaptive timing thresholds can also be calculated and used. If two minimum peaks are found within a first (e.g., variable or adaptive) step time threshold (i.e., t1 below) of each other for walking and a second (e.g., predetermined or fixed) step time threshold such as 0.25 sec. of each other for jogging, only the one of greater amplitude may be considered as a heel-strike point.
t
1
=f
z×0.1/mean(SMA)
The first timing threshold can be calculated for each walking activity segment as a function of the sampling frequency (fs) and the signal magnitude area SMA. A minimum value such as 0.5 sec. can be set for the first timing threshold.
To enhance the ability to address this issue of activity with high variability of heel strike accelerations (particularly during walking segments which included stair climbing), the algorithm can be extended to check for missing steps in each segment of data by calculating the difference in time between each successive identified heel-strike point. For walking (i.e., a first speed category), if there was a first time interval such as 2.5 sec. or longer between successive heel-strike points (2.0 sec. or longer between the first heel-strike point and the start of the activity segment and the last heel-strike point and the end of the activity segment), the acceleration thresholds were updated or recalculated for the segment of data within 0.5 sec. from either heel-strike point and new heel strike points were looked for within that segment. For jogging (i.e., a second speed category) if the time interval was a second time interval such as 1.25 sec. or longer between successive heel-strike points (1 sec. or longer between the first heel-strike point and the start of the activity segment and the last heel-strike point and the end of the activity segment), the acceleration thresholds were recalculated or updated for the segment of data within 0.25 sec. from either heel-strike point and new heel-strike points were sought within that segment.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In particular, the continuous wavelet transform algorithm and the adaptive threshold step counting algorithm can be used alone or in combination, and either or both algorithms can be used in combination with other movement detection algorithms such as, for example, those in the articles identified above and incorporated herein.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/857,630, filed Jul. 23, 2013, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING MOVEMENT IN A PATIENT, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/857,892, filed Jul. 24, 2013, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING MOVEMENT IN A PATIENT, which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and for all purposes.
This invention was made with government support under contract nos. NIH T32HD07447, NIH K12HD065987 and DoD DM090896. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61857630 | Jul 2013 | US | |
61857892 | Jul 2013 | US |