This invention relates generally to water treatment using an electrolytic chamber to generate oxygen for the oxidation, conversion, and precipitation of contaminants so as to facilitate subsequent removal of the contaminants by filtration. More specifically, the present invention is directed to a treatment apparatus and related methods for maximizing the useful life of the electrodes and minimizing build-up of precipitates and contaminants during generation of oxygen for water sources having varying levels of contaminants.
Water systems which obtain their water by pumping from underground water tables using wells can have numerous water quality problems. It is typical to find that ground water has high amounts of dissolved minerals which come from the rocks within the aquifers. Further is it quite common to find nuisance and even toxic metals dissolved into the water. Treating this ground water so that the resulting water is appealing or safe to use can be a challenging pursuit.
Most of the minerals and metals that are dissolved in ground water are ionic, that is, the molecules are disassociated atoms in solution. These ions are quite small, ranging from 3-20 angstrom units or 0.0003 to 0.0020 microns in size. Filtration of ions with conventional filtering technologies is almost impossible, leaving only the more expensive treatment options such as reverse osmosis, deionization or distillation. It is easy to see the minerals which are dissolved in water as they leave white or colored powders and deposits when the water is evaporated. If the deposit is easily dissolved by adding fresh water, the deposit is soft. If the deposit does not readily dissolve in water again—it is considered hard. Water with hard minerals dissolved into it is problematic to water systems, particularly with water heating systems, as hard water tends to build up scale and thick deposits of these precipitated insoluble minerals and damage or occlude the piping, heat exchangers, or tanks etc. Soft waters do not experience this kind of problem.
To treat minerals, it is quite common to exchange one type of mineral for another by using an electrostatic resin. For example, a typical water softener can exchange calcium and magnesium carbonates (hardness) for sodium chloride (softness). In this process, the water softener has a large bed of resin beads composed of quaternary ammonium cations. Each bead has an electrostatic charge such that the bead can be coated to hold an amount of common salts, with sodium chloride being among the most common. This anionic ion-exchange resin has an affinity to certain minerals and prefers “hard” minerals more than the “soft” minerals. In use, water containing hard minerals passes by these resin beads and the hard minerals stick to the resin while the soft minerals are displaced from the resin. The process continues until there are no remaining soft minerals on the beads. When the beads are saturated with hard minerals, even these hard minerals begin to escape such that “hard” water beings exiting the water softener. The process is reversed by flooding the spent resin with a saturated solution of soft minerals until all of the hard minerals are removed in a process called brining. After a water rinse, the resin bed is ready to exchange soft for hard minerals again. Water softening does not remove minerals but instead exchanges problematic hard minerals for soft minerals.
Dissolved metals pose a similar problem. These metals are normally dissolved into the ground water in the absence of oxygen so they are transparent. Iron is a common metal contaminant and is usually found as clear-water iron or ferrous iron. Iron in the ferrous or non-oxidized form is not able to be filtered with conventional filtering technologies and again requires the more expensive methods for removal such as, for example, reverse osmosis, deionization or distillation. Iron can also be removed from water using a chemically based removal system, such as potassium permanganate and greens and filtration systems. However, if ferrous iron is exposed to oxygen, the resulting oxidized iron precipitates into a larger, suspended molecule, which can then be filtered using conventional filtration techniques including a large variety of common media filters using sand or other mineral particulates being the most common. While iron and manganese tend to be among the most common dissolved metals, arsenic, chromium, and other highly toxic metals are also able to be filtered with conventional filtering technologies when oxidized.
Most systems that are in use today to remove iron and manganese use air as the source of oxygen. Air contains about 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen—with the balance comprising carbon dioxide and other trace gases. Air is introduced into the contaminated water using a variety of methods and given enough time, the dissolved metals will oxidize and there precipitate for removal using conventional filtration techniques.
Most commercial iron removal systems require long retention times to adequately oxidize iron and manganese, and are not normally able to treat some of the other more toxic metals. Further, the added minerals in these waters are also precipitated and foul the piping, tanks, valves—which reduces the life of all of the components. In addition, water containing dissolved iron is often plagued by iron-eating bacteria. This type of biological contaminant is not normally toxic, but can cause significant problems in water and water treatment equipment by forming thick impervious biofilms. Evidence of the presence of iron-eating bacteria can include orange and blood-stained clothing, toilets, showers, as well as a foul odor.
There have been recent advances in the technology of aqueous metallic oxidation by using electrolysis. U.S. Pat. No. 6,689,262 discloses a method to produce pure micro-bubbles of oxygen in water, and U.S. Patent Applications 2006/0150491 and 2004/0118701 teach methods of utilizing this technology to treat water in flow-through devices. In general, these techniques use electricity and titanium electrodes to convert water into microbubbles of pure oxygen so as to cause dissolved aqueous metallic contaminants to be oxidized for subsequent removal with suitable barrier filtration technologies. These micro bubbles of oxygen rapidly and effectively convert dissolved metals into metallic oxides suitable for conventional filtering. Flow-through chambers are constructed to house various arrays of anodes and cathodes and allow the efficient generation of micro bubbles of pure oxygen. These very small bubbles rapidly dissolve into water at a very high rate and can often super-saturate water. These devices are so effective at oxidizing water electrolytically that they will precipitate metals and minerals to an excess.
Unfortunately, electrolytic water treatment systems are subject to fouling and operational disruptions caused by the formation and deposit of precipitated minerals and metallic oxides on the electrodes. These precipitates build rapidly on electrodes and surrounding surfaces until they become occluded and rendered electrically impotent. In response, prior systems have included methods for alternating the polarity of these electrodes periodically such that a partial reversal of the scaling process can take place. Any electrode acting as an anode will evolve hydrogen-based acidic water (H+) near the electrode surface as it releases oxygen bubbles. This acidic water film can help to remove surface deposits which were precipitated during the previous cathodic operation interval. At the opposing electrode, or cathode, water is converted into a basic or alkaline species with an excess of hydroxide molecules (OH−). In this environment, hydrogen is evolved while scale is precipitated on the anode's metal surface. The reversal of the electrical polarity will help forestall the eventual degradation of the electrodes but as they are used, they will decay to a point which renders them ineffective. By treating the titanium electrode with a catalytic coating such as iridium, platinum, rhodium, and ruthenium, various anodic and cathodic reactions can be optimized to produce cleaner longer-lasting electrodes and yield of preferred evolved gases.
Given the state-of-the-art in electrode technology materials, using the optimum polarity reversal timing schemes, and even employing intelligent current and voltage control, these electrolytic chambers have a relatively short life—even thought they are very efficient at precipitating metallic and mineral contaminants. As such, it would be advantageous to improve on current electrolytic treatment systems so as to increase their effective life.
The electrolytic water treatment process disclosed herein, addresses three of the shortcomings identified with electrolytic water treatment systems; (1) short electrode life; (2) mineral precipitation and fouling; and (3) control of biofilms and organic fouling.
If an electrolytic flow-through chamber is employed in clean, softened water, water without hard minerals or metallic contaminants, the life of the electrodes will last a considerable time. It is the purpose of this invention to place the electrolytic flow-through chamber in this type of clean, softened water while still providing superior aqueous metallic oxidation.
The above summary of the invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present invention. The figures and the detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify these embodiments.
These as well as other objects and advantages of this invention, will be more completely understood and appreciated by referring to the following more detailed description of the presently preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
Various configurations of conventional well water treatment systems of the prior art are illustrated generally in
It is common for well water 104 to be categorized as “hard” water necessitating the use of an ion-exchange water softener 110. In cases where the well water 104 includes a low amount of dissolved iron (generally less than 3 ppm), water softener 110 can be used to remove the iron with the consequence that the ion exchange resin in the water softener 110 becomes iron-fouled. In some cases where iron is removed with water softener 110, it is often necessary to use chemicals such as sodium bisulfite mixed into a brine tank 112 to cleanse the resin of iron deposits during the water softener's 10 recharging cycle.
As illustrated in
The disadvantages of the system illustrated in
Referring generally to
Water which has been treated and cleaned by filtration in the sand filter 118 is obtained using the pump 154 to direct water through a connection into the electrolytic oxygen generator 151. At this point, metallic-free water is oxidized and returned to the main flow stream. This oxidized bypass flow 152 is injected before the sand filter 118 and is therefore blended with the raw un-treated water. The oxygen saturated bypass water has sufficient ability to react with any aqueous metal in the raw water coming from the pressure tank 106. The metals are oxidized, precipitated, and then filtered from the water. In this environment, the electrolytic chamber 150 can operate for extended times before any significant metallic fouling occurs. A check valve 156 can be installed into the raw water line coming from the pressure tank 106 to prevent any oxidized water from affecting upstream components such as the pressure tank 106, pressure switch 108, or well pump 102. It may be desirable for some water systems to have a hard water tap 158 which provides hard water for irrigation and a separate soft water tap 159 for laundry and other household uses. In this case, it is preferable for any device such as the flow sensor 140 to be installed at a point after the sand filter 118, but before any hard water tap 158 is located to be able to measure any water that is flowing regardless of whether it is hard or soft water.
Softened water is water which has had its “hard” minerals exchanged for “soft” minerals and the most common type of soft mineral is sodium chloride. During electrolysis, sodium chloride will evolve chlorine and this will form sodium hypochlorite (bleach). This is the same chemical disinfectant which the municipalities use to treat city water and swimming pools. Many residential well water systems are plagued with organic contaminants and other toxic pathogens. Chlorine is metered into these wells using venturi injectors, metering pumps, or even electrolytic chlorinators. Swimming pools also benefit from electrolytic chlorinators when sufficient amounts of common table salt (sodium chloride) are added to the water.
Electrolytic oxygen generators 151 can only work if the water has a sufficient amount of minerals ionically dissolved into the water. Operating one of these electrolytic oxygen generators 151 in pure water will not work because no electricity will flow through the water as pure water conducts no electricity. Electrical current must jump from ion to ion to travel between the electrodes and complete a circuit. It is important that there is at least a minimum amount of minerals for the electrochemistry to work correctly. It should be noted that too much mineral concentration will also adversely affect the performance and or life of the electrodes. If there are high levels of sodium chloride in the water, the levels of chlorine generated may be too high for normal water use.
One of the disadvantages with the systems as depicted in
It can be seen that the bypass water can be drawn from either locations after the sand filter 118 or after the softener 110 depending on the desire to evolve chlorine or manage hard water build-up on electrodes in the electrolytic oxygen generator 151.
This arrangement is perhaps the simplest clean-water electrolytic oxygen generator system considering it does not require a bypass pump or an additional flow sensor. It can be seen that the water can be drawn from after the sand filter 118 or after the water softener 110 depending on the desire to evolve chlorine or manage hard water build-up on electrodes in the electrolytic oxygen generator 151.
Referring now to Table A below as well as
Referring now to
Pre-packaged filtration system 300 further comprises a media filter 310, a water softener 312, a bypass pump 314 and an electrolytic generator 316, all of which are fixably retained to the mounting frame 302 by suitable connection to the mounting floor 304 and mounting members 306. Depending upon desired system capacity and dimensional limitations, water softener 312 can include an integral brine tank or alternative, a stand-alone brine tank 318 that is similarly mounted to the mounting frame 302. In some embodiments, a saturated sodium chloride stream from the brine tank 318 can be selectively treated with the electrolytic generator 316 to generate chlorine gas for purposes of disinfecting, sanitizing or otherwise shocking the pre-packaged filtration system 300.
Pre-packaged filtration system 300 further comprises an integrated plumbing network 320 for fluidly interconnecting the various components. As illustrated, integrated plumbing network 320 includes a raw water inlet portion 322, on oxygenated raw water portion 324, a media filtered raw water portion 326, a softened bypass portion 328 and a softened outlet portion 330. Integrated plumbing network 320 is generally formed of suitable materials such as, for example, PVC or CPVC piping or polyethylene hose. Bypass pump 314 and an electrolytic element of the electrolytic generator 316 are fluidly positioned in the softened bypass portion 328. It will be understood that pre-packaged filtration system 300 and integrated plumbing network 320 can assume the variety of system configurations illustrated and as discussed previously with respect to
Pre-packaged filtration system 300 allows for easy of use and installation by providing an essentially self-contained filtration system for removing contaminants including, for example, aqueous metals, from a water supply. Generally, pre-packaged filtration system 300 can be positioned at a desired point of use and connected by attaching the raw water inlet portion 322 to a water supply and the softened outlet portion 330 to a water distribution plumbing network. The media filter 310, water softener 312, bypass pump 314 are preferably wired to an electrical box 332 on the electrolytic generator 316 such that the pre-packaged filtration system 300 shares a common power inlet 334 on the electrolytic generator 316. A raw water supply inters the raw water inlet portion 322 and is through the media filter 310 wherein any particulate matter including oxidized metal precipitates is removed. The filtered water enters the water softener 312 through the media filtered raw water portion 326 such that any hardness within the water is removed. The softened water leaves the water softener 312 and is distributed to points of use through the softened outlet portion 330. A portion of the softened water is recirculated through the softened bypass portion 328 using bypass pump 314. This softened water flows past the inline electrolytic element such that oxygen gas is generated and dissolved within the recirculated softened water. The recirculated softened water including the dissolved oxygen gas is directed into the raw water inlet portion 322 such that any contaminants including aqueous metals are oxidized or otherwise treated prior to the media filter 310 for removal by the media filter 310. By eliminating the exposure of the inline electrolytic element to harness, scaling on the inline electrolytic element is reduced if not eliminated.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments. It will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many modifications and equivalent arrangements can be made thereof without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, such scope to be accorded the broadest interpretation of the appended claims so as to encompass all equivalent structures and products.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/025,034 filed Jan. 31, 2008, and entitled “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED ELECTROLYTIC WATER TREATMENT PROCESS”, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1677153 | Spencer | Jul 1928 | A |
3671022 | Laird et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3975269 | Ramirez | Aug 1976 | A |
4012319 | Ramirez | Mar 1977 | A |
4071447 | Ramirez | Jan 1978 | A |
4225401 | Divisek et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4252856 | Sara | Feb 1981 | A |
4257352 | Habegger | Mar 1981 | A |
4587001 | Cairns et al. | May 1986 | A |
4732661 | Wright | Mar 1988 | A |
4908109 | Wright | Mar 1990 | A |
5015354 | Nishiki et al. | May 1991 | A |
5049252 | Murrell | Sep 1991 | A |
5148772 | Kirschbaum | Sep 1992 | A |
5182014 | Goodman | Jan 1993 | A |
5534143 | Portier et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5552052 | Mazewski et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561944 | Ismail et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5622610 | Nakamura | Apr 1997 | A |
5697187 | Persinger | Dec 1997 | A |
5728287 | Hough et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5766479 | Collentro et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5807473 | Sadler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5858199 | Hanak | Jan 1999 | A |
5887383 | Soeda | Mar 1999 | A |
5982609 | Evans | Nov 1999 | A |
6171469 | Hough et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173526 | Mazzei | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6284293 | Crandall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299145 | Ganan-Calvo | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315886 | Zappi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328875 | Zappi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6386751 | Wootan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394429 | Ganan-Calvo | May 2002 | B2 |
6471873 | Greenberg et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491815 | Zulik et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508033 | Hessel et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6524475 | Herrington et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6634138 | Katzman | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6689262 | Senkiw | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6890126 | Mazzei | May 2005 | B2 |
7045102 | Fraser et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7128278 | Archambeau et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7396441 | Senkiw | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20010027943 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020074237 | Takesako et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020168418 | Lorenz, II et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040118786 | Fraser et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060150491 | Senkiw | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080179259 | Senkiw | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080202995 | Senkiw | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080237060 | Hegel et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 412 472 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 723 936 | Jul 1996 | EP |
1 522 188 | Aug 1978 | GB |
63309118 | Dec 1988 | JP |
2004-249174 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2000-0060834 | Oct 2000 | KR |
WO 9521795 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9939561 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0189997 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 03072507 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090211919 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61025034 | Jan 2008 | US |