The following co-pending application, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/115,336, to Elrod et al., filed Apr. 1, 2002, titled “Apparatus and Method for Using Electrostatic Force to Cause Fluid Movement”, is assigned to the same assignee of the present application. The entire disclosure of this co-pending application is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present exemplary embodiment relates to miniaturized genetic, biochemical, and chemical processes related to analysis, synthesis, and purification procedures. More specifically, the present exemplary embodiment provides an apparatus and method for improved electrostatic merging and mixing of liquid droplets in which two such liquid droplets are moved towards each other. It finds particular application in conjunction with combinatorial chemistry and nanocalorimetry, and will be described with particular reference thereto. However, it is to be appreciated that the present exemplary embodiment is also amenable to other like applications.
Existing electrostatic drop merger concepts are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/115,336, titled “Apparatus and Method for Using Electrostatic Force to Cause Fluid Movement”. Those designs, i.e. the single capacitor design, consist of two electrodes laid out on a single substrate. The substrate and the electrodes are covered with a dielectric substance which insulates the electrodes. The electrodes are arranged in a straight edge pattern as well as a triangle or chevron pattern, spaced apart, so that a gap is formed between the electrodes. A first droplet is deposited in an asymmetrical pattern across the gap between the electrodes such that a larger volume of the droplet rests on one of the electrodes. Another droplet is deposited in close proximity to the first droplet, but on the opposite side of the gap. When a voltage is applied across the electrodes, the first droplet moves towards a centering position across the gap, thus in an equilibrium position between the two electrodes, where it touches the second, stationary, droplet and the droplets merge together.
When two droplets of equivalent size are brought together by moving one droplet into another stationary droplet, the droplets coalesce into a single droplet. The two droplets touch each other such that one side of the combined droplet has the liquid from the first droplet and the other side of the combined droplet has the liquid from the second droplet. Mixing occurs primarily due to diffusion between the two liquids at the boundary between them.
Using the existing electrostatic drop merger designs of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/115,336, mixing time may be decreased to some extent by using droplets of different sizes. If the first droplet is smaller than the other stationary droplet, and the droplets are brought together, the momentum of the smaller droplet will cause a swirling motion in the combined droplet. This swirling motion both increases the internal area over which the diffusion occurs and, depending on relative speed, may create a shearing motion inside the combined droplet, a motion which may create internal weak vortices (packets of rotating fluid) which further enhance mixing rates. Additionally, the smaller droplet may be moved forcibly into the larger, stationary, droplet. However, as the smaller droplet's diameter (and hence its mass) decreases, the momentum (or kinetic energy) of the smaller droplet decreases as well, thus decreasing its ability to enhance mixing.
Another area of study directed to the movement of fluids is being undertaken at Duke University, Durham, N.C., under the paradigm of digital microfluidics, which is based upon micromanipulation of discrete droplets. Microfluidic processing is performed on unit-sized packets of fluid which are transported, stored, mixed, reacted or analyzed in a discrete manner using a standard set of basic construction.
Research has focused on the use of electrowetting arrays to demonstrate the digital microfluidic concept. Electrowetting is essentially the phenomenon whereby an electric field can modify the wetting behavior of a droplet in contact with an insulated electrode. If an electric field is applied non-uniformly, then a surface energy gradient is created which can be used to manipulate a droplet sandwiched between two plates.
In accordance with one aspect of the present exemplary embodiment, an apparatus for merging and mixing two droplets using electrostatic forces is disclosed. The apparatus includes a substrate on which are disposed a first originating electrode, a center electrode, and a second originating electrode. The electrodes are disposed such that a first gap is formed between the first originating electrode and the center electrode and a second gap is formed between the second originating electrode and the center electrode. A dielectric material covers the electrodes on the substrate.
In another aspect of the present exemplary embodiment, a method for merging and mixing two droplets is disclosed. The droplets are placed on a substrate on which a first originating electrode, a center electrode, and a second originating electrode are disposed, such that a first gap is formed between the first originating electrode and the center electrode and a second gap is formed between the second originating electrode and the center electrode. A dielectric material surrounds the electrodes on the substrate. A first droplet is deposited asymmetrically across the first gap, and a second droplet is deposited asymmetrically across the second gap. Voltage potentials are placed across the first gap and second gap, respectively, whereby each droplet is moved toward the other such that they collide together, causing the droplets to merge and mix, and causing oscillations within the collided droplet.
In another aspect of the present exemplary embodiment, a method for merging and mixing two droplets is disclosed. The droplets are placed on a substrate on which a first electrode and a second electrode are disposed, such that a gap is created between the two electrodes. A dielectric material surrounds the electrodes on the substrate. A first droplet is deposited on asymmetrically across the gap, and a second droplet is disposed on the second electrode. A voltage potential is placed across the gap whereby the first droplet moves toward and collides with the second droplet, causing the droplets to merge and mix, and causing oscillations within the collided droplet.
In accord with another aspect of the present exemplary embodiment, an apparatus for merging and mixing two droplets is provided in a design with an electrode gap parallel to the direction of motion of the drops.
As noted in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/115,336, the results obtained by a drop-merging action in a device described therein are very sensitive to the positioning of the drops, and in particular to the separation (i.e., gap) between the drops. If the gap is too large, the drops will, in fact, not merge. The present application which describes a “dual merger” concept intends to bring both drops in motion at the same time, thereby improving the overall yield of merged drops by providing more tolerance for the positioning of the drops, since each drop now only needs to travel half the separation distance to successfully merge.
Additionally, previously existing single capacitor electrostatic drop merger designs cause mixing within the droplet to occur primarily through diffusion, which is a relatively slow process. The following concepts teach a manner in which to increase the quality of mixing while at the same time keeping the mixing time to a minimum. This mixing is especially useful for assay screening applications, where multiple samples are screened at the same time using 96, 384, or 1536-well microtitre plates. Moreover, in some situations it is beneficial to use droplets of substantially similar size in order to improve throughput through the assay screening process.
With reference to
Substrate 110 refers to a material having a rigid or semi-rigid or flexible surface. In many of the embodiments, the surface of the substrate 110 will be substantially flat, although in some embodiments it may be desirable to physically separate synthesis regions for different samples with, for example, wells, raised regions, etched trenches, or the like. In some embodiments, the substrate 110 itself may contain wells, trenches, flow through regions, porous solid regions, etc., which form all or part of the synthesis region. Substrate 110 may be fabricated from various materials known in the art, for example, glass, plastic, or resin.
Electrodes 120, 130, and 140 may be thin metal films patterned using any thin film deposition process known in the art. The first originating electrode 120 and the second originating electrode 140 may range in size from approximately 10 micrometers to 5 mm on each side. The center electrode 130 may range in width from about 400 micrometers to about 600 micrometers. The first gap 150 and second gap 160 may range in size from about 1 micrometer to about 500 micrometers. It is to be understood these values are for a particular device, and other values may be appropriate, depending on the implementation.
The dielectric layer 170 covers the electrodes 120, 130 and 140 with insulating material and may range in thickness from about 0.1 micrometers to 100 micrometers. Examples of suitable materials for the dielectric layer 170 include silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, Tantalum Oxide or polymers such as Parylene, Dupont Teflon AF, 3M Fluorad, 3M EGC 1700, other fluoropolymers, polysiloxanes, diamond-like carbon or other spin-coated, spray-coated, dip coated, or vapor deposited polymers. In embodiments with aqueous based droplets, the dielectric layer 170 is preferably highly hydrophobic. In embodiments with oil based droplets, the dielectric layer 170 is preferably highly oleophobic in order to enhance the motion of the droplets. As an example, a hydrophobic dielectric may be made of Parylene. As an alternative to a hydrophobic or oleophobic dielectric layer, a hydrophobic or oleophobic surface coating may be used on top of the dielectric layer 170. Suitable hydrophobic materials typically include Fluorocarbons such as Dupont Teflon AF, 3M Fluorad, 3M EGC 1700, other fluoropolymers, polysiloxanes, diamond-like carbon or vapor or plasma deposited fluorocarbons.
Turning to
Within the measurement region 215, a first droplet is placed asymmetrically across the first gap 225 such that a larger percentage of the volume of the first droplet is on the first originating electrode 220. A second droplet is placed asymmetrically across the second gap 235 such that a larger percentage of the volume of the second droplet is on the second originating electrode 240. Concurrently with the placement of the first set of droplets, a first droplet is placed within the reference region 245 asymmetrically across the first gap 255 such that a larger percentage of the volume of the first droplet is on the first originating electrode 250. A second droplet is placed asymmetrically across the second gap 265 such that a larger percentage of the volume of the second droplet is on the second originating electrode 270. A voltage potential is applied across the first voltage potential electrode 275 and the second voltage potential electrodes 270, thereby supplying a voltage potential via runners 285 & 280 across the first gaps 225 & 255 and the second gaps 235 and 265, such that the first droplets move toward the second droplets and the second droplets move toward the first droplets whereby the droplets collide, merge, and mix together. Thermistors (not shown) in the measurement region 215 and reference region 245 thereafter measure the measurement temperature and the reference temperature, respectively, of the collided droplets.
With reference to
In any case, as shown in
In addition to the droplets colliding and successfully merging, it has been observed that droplets will actually overshoot their equilibrium position when voltage pulses above certain thresholds are applied across the gaps. The existing single capacitor electrostatic drop merger design, as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/115,336, filed Apr. 1, 2002, and titled “Apparatus and Method for Using Electrostatic Force to Cause Fluid Movement”, posited that the electrostatic force caused the asymmetrically-placed droplet to move from an initial asymmetric position across the gap to a position of equilibrium in which the droplet was centered across the gap. If the droplet attempted to move further, a restoring force would try to push the drop back to the centered position, thus limiting the movement to the equilibrium position. It also posited that if the momentum of the droplet was large enough, the restoring force may not be large enough to prevent the droplet from moving a greater distance off or moving completely off the originating electrode. This concept is shown in one embodiment in
By examining high speed videos taken in the laboratory environment, it has been observed the droplets may overshoot their equilibrium position. This overshoot results in oscillations of the collided droplet that occur for a period of time after the droplets collide with each other, and that continue until the surface tension of the droplet reigns in the oscillations. These oscillations create increased agitation (beyond simple diffusion) within the collided droplet that enhances mixing for from about 15 milliseconds to 20 milliseconds following collision of the two droplets.
Additionally, it has been observed that this oscillation can also be made to occur in the existing single capacitor design in which a droplet moves and merges with a second, stationary, droplet, as shown in
The length of the pulses and the level of voltage potential needed to create the overshoot depend on the materials used. The more the droplet material adheres to the dielectric surface, the greater the voltage necessary to cause the droplet to overshoot its equilibrium position across the gap. For droplets consisting of proteins, voltages of from about 180V to about 220V have been observed to create a desirable overshoot and enhanced mixing. For droplets of water, the voltage is lower, typically about 120V.
It should be noted that the droplet merging action is sensitive to the positioning of the droplets, in particular to the separation between the droplets. In order for the droplets to successfully merge and mix, the droplets must be initially placed sufficiently close together, but without touching, such that the electrostatic force may operate on the droplets. On the other hand, when the droplets become spaced too far apart, the electrostatic force will no longer be sufficient to move the droplets together. It has been observed experimentally that using the single capacitor, straight edge or chevron design, once the closest edges of the droplets are placed greater than about 200 to 250 micrometers apart, the droplets will not mix and merge. Therefore, the droplets in the system described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/115,336 are placed initially within close proximity of each other in order for successful merging to occur. However, existing droplet placement equipment and techniques limit how closely droplets may be placed. As droplets are placed closer and closer, the droplets become more difficult to place, resulting in increased placement error and waste and decreasing the resulting yield.
With the dual capacitor drop merger design of the present exemplary embodiment, droplets may be successfully merged even when the closest edges of the two droplets are spaced up to about 300 micrometers apart. For a 250 nanoliter droplet, this equates to a center-to-center separation distance of about 1.1 millimeters between droplets. These limitations, in turn, affect the dimensions of the center electrode, which affects the spacing of the two droplets.
With reference to
As shown in Table 1, while the existing, single capacitor, chevron design provided increased tolerance for mispositioning and misalignment of the droplets, even with the chevron design, the yield was only 70% or less. This equates to 58% yield for a single nanocalorimeter measurement requiring the merging of two pairs of drops (one pair for reference, and one pair for the measurement). Once the center electrode width is reduced to approximately 400 micrometers, the droplets cannot be spaced far enough apart but still asymmetrically across the gap between electrodes for successful operation, and the yield decreases.
Turning to
With attention to
Also provided in
By employing the profiled electrodes, the horizontal component of the electric field's strength will vary along gap 730 providing an energetically favorable environment for the combined droplet 780 to be maintained at the center point of the electrode gap, where the distance between the electrodes is smallest and the field strength the highest. Thus, this embodiment acts to maintain the combined drop 780 (i.e., after the merging has occurred) to a greater degree than constant-width designs. Controlling the position of the merged or combined droplets in this way is intended to provide beneficial aspects by maintaining improved symmetry between a reference and measurement sites in a nanocalorimeter device.
It is to be appreciated that while this embodiment is shown in a design where the gap is parallel to movement, profiled electrode gaps may also be used in embodiments, where movement is perpendicular to the gap, as in previous embodiments.
Additionally, while the gap profile shown in the above embodiment results in of an “hourglass” design, it is to be understood that other electrode profiles, such as curved profiles, asymmetrical profiles, irregular-polygon profiles, sawtooth profiles as well as others, may be useful.
Still further, and with attention to
Similar to the embodiments of
The beneficial aspect of profiling in this and the previous embodiments, is to provide an increased control over the x-position of the combined drop (as indicated in the figures).
Again, while the gaps shown here are designed as “hourglass” gaps, it is to be understood that the profile of the electrodes may be of other profiles, such as curved profiles, asymmetrical profiles, irregular-polygon profiles, sawtooth profiles or others, which would be within the understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art.
Turning to
The method of droplet placement also affects the operation of the present embodiments. Droplets may be placed in a number of ways. They may be pushed out of a hypodermic needle manually. Manual placement allows gentle placement of the droplets, but the placement requires a long time and is not conducive to combinatorial chemistry applications, where rapid testing of large assays is desired. Alternatively, a commercial, non-contact jet dispensing system may be used. While commercial systems allow for increased speed of placement, they tend to place the droplet down with more force, resulting in the droplet compressing on the surface. This compression increases the cross-sectional contact area with the surface and thus makes placing the droplets closer together more difficult. As another alternative, a commercial dispensing system such as the Equator dispensing system from Deerac Fluidics may be used. This Equator dispensing system can produce a droplet either as a single droplet of the final desired volume or as a series of smaller volume droplets placed one on top of the other. In the laboratory, it was found that two 250 nanoliter droplets, produced by placing single droplets of 250 nanoliters directly on the substrate, cannot be placed closer than 1.3 millimeters apart because the droplets merge together during the placement of the second droplet. However, droplets made from five 50 nanoliter droplets can be placed as close as 1.0 millimeter apart without contacting each other during the deposition. Droplets formed by such procedures are seen for example in
While particular embodiments have been described, alternatives, modifications, variations, improvements, and substantial equivalents that are or may be presently unforeseen may arise to applicants or others skilled in the art. Accordingly, the appended claims as filed and as they may be amended are intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, variations, improvements, and substantial equivalents.
This invention was made with United States Government support under HHSN 26600400058C/N01-AI-40058 awarded by NIH. The United States Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6565727 | Shenderov | May 2003 | B1 |
20030183525 | Elrod et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030186453 | Bell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030186454 | Bruce et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030186455 | Bruce et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9954730 | Oct 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Washizu, Masao, Electrostatic Actuation of Liquid Droplets for Microreactor Applications; IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 34, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1998; pp. 732-737. |
Duke University, Durham NC, Digital Microfluidics, http://www.ee.duke.edu/Research/microfluidics/, Dec. 11, 2004; pp. 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060132542 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |