This application claims the priority, under 35 U.S.C. § 119, of European patent application EP 15 167 175.7, filed May 11, 2015; the prior application is herewith incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention lies in the field of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and relates, generally, to balanced steady-state free precision (bSSFP) imaging in magnetic resonance (MR).
Balanced steady-state free precision—bSSFP—is an imaging technique in MR providing a very high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in comparison to other MR imaging techniques. However, inevitable field inhomogeneities in the imaged object (off-resonance effects) lead to periodic signal modulations in bSSFP, which typically manifest themselves in the resulting images as regions with reduced or cancelled signal or so-called banding artifacts.
Constructive Interference in Steady State (CISS) addresses this problem of banding artifacts by sequentially acquiring two (or more) bSSFP datasets with different radio-frequency (RF) phase increments. The different RF phase increments add a constant phase to the object to be imaged, effectively moving the location of signal voids spatially. The images can subsequently be combined with different methods, such as sum-of-squares (SOS) or maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstructions, in order to obtain banding-free images (see e.g. Casselman, Jan W., et al., “Pathology of the membranous labyrinth: comparison of T1-and T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced spin-echo and 3DFT-CISS imaging”, American journal of neuroradiology 14.1 (1993): 59-69).
CISS is quite effective to remove banding artifacts in the large flip angle regime (for tissues, typically flip angles greater than about 40-50 degrees are required; for fluids flip angles of around 70-90 degrees are necessary), but fails at low flip angles. Especially at high fields, appropriate CISS imaging might not be feasible due to Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limitations. Moreover, the reconstructed CISS images do no longer reflect the genuine bSSFP steady-state signal amplitude. For illustration,
A banding-free reconstruction of the genuine bSSFP signal is of high interest for the clinical use of bSSFP imaging because signal voids hamper radiological reading. It is also important for quantitative imaging, i.e. T1/T2 relaxometry because a deviation from the true bSSFP signal model introduces false relaxometry estimates.
It is accordingly an object of the invention to provide a magnetic resonance imaging method and apparatus which overcome the above-mentioned and other disadvantages of the heretofore-known devices and methods of this general type and to provide a method and an apparatus for improving MR images obtained by the bSSFP imaging technique.
With the foregoing and other objects in view there is provided, in accordance with the invention, a method for improving intensity homogeneity of image data acquired using a balanced steady-state free precision (bSSFP) sequence in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the method comprising:
performing multiple bSSFP sequences with different radio frequency (RF) phase increments by using a MR imaging apparatus, to generate multiple bSSFP image volumes with different phase offset Φ of an object to be examined, each image volume containing voxels having intensities M that are a function of a nuclear resonance signal, and wherein a position and a size of the voxel is defined by a field of view (FOV) and a desired resolution;
a per-voxel fitting of a mathematical signal model onto a measured magnetization M of the FOV as a function of the phase offset Φ;
determining from the fit a spin density M0, a relaxation time ratio Λ and a local phase offset ΔΦ for each voxel;
generating a homogeneous image of the object by calculating a new signal intensity M(Φ) for each voxel, using the previously obtained spin density M0 and the relaxation time ratio Λ, and choosing ΔΦ so that Φ−ΔΦ=0°, in order to obtain the homogeneous image of the object.
In other words, the objects of the invention are achieved with respect to a method for improving intensity homogeneity of image data acquired from a bSSFP sequence in MR imaging by removing the banding effect, the method comprising:
performing multiple bSSFP sequences with different radio frequency (RF) phase increments by using a MR imaging apparatus in order to create multiple bSSFP image volumes (i.e. a bSSFP image series) with different phase offsets ϕ of an object to be examined, wherein each image volume comprises voxels whose intensities M are a function of a nuclear resonance signal (or magnetization) measured by the MR imaging apparatus. Each image voxel corresponds to a sub-volume of the whole measurement volume, wherein its position and size is defined by a Field of View (FOV) and the image resolution. According to known techniques, the MRI apparatus will acquire the so-called nuclear resonance signal for each sub-volume thus for each image voxel. Hereafter, a voxel will be referred to as both, a sub-volume of the whole measured volume, defined by FOV and resolution, and a data-point in the image as they represent the same volume of the object to be imaged.
a per-voxel fitting of a mathematical signal model onto the measured magnetization (represented by the image intensity M) of the FOV in function of the phase offset Φ (i.e. the different bSSFP images with different RF increment) for instance by using the equation:
wherein M0 is the spin density of a given voxel in the FOV, Λ the relaxation time ratio T1/T2, α the flip-angle of the bSSFP sequence, ΔΦ the local phase offset caused by B0 field inhomogeneity for said given voxel;
determining from said fit the spin density M0, the relaxation time ratio Λ and the local phase offset ΔΦ for each voxel. Optionally, at least one of the following quantitative parameter maps might be determined: a quantitative parameter map representing the spin density M0 for all voxels; a quantitative parameter map representing the relaxation time ratio Λ for all voxels; and a quantitative parameter map representing the local phase offset ΔΦ for all voxels;
generating a homogeneous image of said object, called hereafter “trueCISS image contrast”, by calculating a new signal intensity M(Φ) for each voxel using the previously obtained spin density M0 and the relaxation time ratio Λ into Eq. 1, wherein ΔΦ is chosen such that Φ−ΔΦ=0° in order to obtain an on-resonant bSSFP image, the latter being advantageously characterized by no signal voids and genuine bSSFP signal contrast, and thus the homogeneous image of said object. The flip-angle α is an independent variable within the mathematical signal model (Eq. 1), and can therefore be freely chosen, advantageously providing trueCISS images of any desired flip-angle even though the bSSPF image data was acquired using a different flip-angle.
The FOV of an object to be examined is for example a slice of a human brain that has to be examined by means of the MR imaging apparatus. According to known techniques, the MR imaging apparatus is indeed able to select an FOV in said object by using gradient magnetic fields in all three spatial directions that are produced by gradient coils of said MR imaging apparatus and to excite nuclear spins of the object(s) that are within said FOV. According to the present invention, a bSSFP sequence is in particular used. The MR imaging apparatus is then able to measure a nuclear resonance signal for the whole measurement volume defined by the FOV, said nuclear resonance signal resulting from the excitation of the nuclear spins within the FOV. The MR imaging apparatus is then able to convert said nuclear resonance signal into image data of the object (also referred as “image reconstruction”), wherein the image comprises voxels of different intensities. According to the present invention, the obtained images are called “bSSFP images”, to point out that a bSSFP sequence was used for acquisition. Each voxel intensity represents thus (or is a function of) the intensity of the measured nuclear resonance signal for a sub-volume, defined by the configured FOV and resolution. The previously described technique is known in the art and does not require further explanations.
Preferably, the claimed method comprises the acquisition of a minimum of two, preferably eight, bSSFP images with different radio frequency (RF) phase increments in order to perform a robust fit by means of Eq. 1. Optionally, the present method comprises a subsampling of the acquisition of the multiple bSSFP images with different radio frequency (RF) phase increments in order to achieve the same or shorter acquisition time as required for CISS (e.g. subsampling factor 4 when using 8 phase increments). Advantageously, subsampling of the acquisition allows decreasing the acquisition time required for acquiring entire images of the object to be examined. For this purpose and preferably, advanced reconstruction methods such as
Finally, the present invention also concerns a MRI apparatus for imaging an object, said MRI apparatus being configured for performing the method steps previously described.
Preferably, each step of the method is automatically performed, for example, by the MR imaging apparatus, without human intervention.
Once more in summary, the present invention provides for a method for improving image homogeneity of image data acquired from balanced Steady-State Free Precision (hereafter bSSFP) sequences in Magnetic Resonance (hereafter MR) imaging. The novel method comprises:
Other features which are considered as characteristic for the invention are set forth in the appended claims.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in an apparatus and method for improving bSSFP in magnetic resonance imaging, it is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims.
The construction and method of operation of the invention, however, together with additional objects and advantages thereof will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
To summarize, the present invention proposes the following:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15167175 | May 2015 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5270654 | Feinberg | Dec 1993 | A |
7567081 | Bieri | Jul 2009 | B2 |
9835705 | Weingartner | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20110234224 | Bieri | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Sumpf T.J., et al.: “Model-Based Nonlinear Inverse Reconstruction for T2 Mapping Using Highly Undersampled Spin-Echo MRI”, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 34, pp. 420-428, 2011. |
Carr H. Y. Steady-State Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance; Physical Review, vol. 112, No. 5 Dec. 1958, pp. 1693-1701 (1958). |
Freeman R. et al: “Phase and Intensity Anomalies in Fourier Transform NMR”; Journal of Magnetic Resonance; vol. 4, No. 3; pp. 366-383; Feb. 4, 1971; XP023956637; Iss. N: . 0022. -2364 DOI:10.1016/0022-2364(71)90047-3. |
Lustig M. et al; “Sparse MRI: The Application of Compressed Sensing for Rapid MR Imaging”; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; vol. 58; pp. 1182-1195; 2007. |
Filbert T. et al.: “TrueCISS: Genuine bSSFP Signal Reconstruction from Undersampled Multiple-Acquisition SSFP Using Model-Based Iterative Non-Linear Inversion”; Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, ISMRM 23rd Annual Meeting and Exhibition Toronto, Ontario, Canada, No. 83; p. 83 ; XP040665766; 2015. |
Cukur T. “Accelerated Phase-Cycled SSFP Imaging With Compressed Sensing”; IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE, Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 34; No. 1; pp. 107-115; XP011568784; ISSN: 0278-0062, DOI:10.1109/TMI.2014.234681; 2015. |
Pruessmann Klaas P., et al.: “SENSE: Sensitivity Encoding for Fast MRI”, in: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, No. 42, pp. 952-962, 1999; 1999. |
Casselmann, Jan W. et al.: “Pathology of the Membranous Labyrinth: Comparison of T 1- and T2-Weighted and Gadolinium-Enhanced Spin-Echo and 3DFT-CISS Imaging”, In: American Journal of Neuroradiology 14.1, pp. 59-69; 1993. |
Deoni, S. CL: “Rapid T2 Estimation With Phase-Cycled Variable Nutation Steady-State Free Precession”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine vol. 52, pp. 435-439; 2004. |
Block K.T. et. al.: “Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Radial Fast Spin-Echo MRI”, Medical Imaging, vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 1759-1769; 2009. |
Bieri Oliver: “An Analytical Description of Balanced Steady-State Free Precession with Finite Radio-Frequency Excitation”; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine., vol. 65; 2011; pp. 422-431; XP055227840; ISSN: 0740-3194; DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22626. |
Griswold M. A., et.al.: “Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA)”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 47, pp. 1202-1210, 2002. |
Björk, Marcus et al.: “Signal Processing Algorithms for Removing Banding Artifacts in MRI”; 18th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPC0-2010), Aalborg, Denmark, Aug. 2010 IEEE; pp. 1000-1004; XP032757457; ISSN: 2076-1465; 2011. |
Santini F. et al.: “Reconstruction and frequency mapping with phase-cycled bSSFP”; Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, ISMRM; 18th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition; Stockholm, Sweden; pp. 3089; XP040614540; 2010. |
Björk, Marcus et al: “Parameter Estimation Approach to Banding Artifact Reduction in Balanced Steady-State Free Precession”; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; vol. 72; No. 3; pp. 880-892; XP055227838; ISSN: 0740-3194, DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24986; 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160334487 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |