Example embodiments generally relate to coring sediments from the earth, and more specifically relate to an improved apparatus and method for coring unconsolidated sediments from the earth.
Wellbores are sometimes drilled into subterranean formations that contain hydrocarbons to allow recovery of the hydrocarbons. The formation materials encountered while drilling into a subterranean formation can vary widely depending on the location and depth of the desired reservoir. In order to properly characterize the materials in a wellbore, one or more samples may be taken and tested to determine a variety of properties of the materials. Specific samples may be taken in various forms including cuttings from the formation in the returned drilling fluids during drilling or special samples cut for testing that are commonly referred to as core samples.
Core samples may be cut using core cutters to produce the samples in a variety of diameters and lengths. The resulting core samples may then be tested in a testing apparatus to determine one or more physical properties of the sample such as the permeability, porosity, fluid flow or fluid or gas saturations in the sample. Special testing apparatuses may be used and specific methods may be carried out to determine the various properties of the samples. Core samples acquired in the subsurface of the earth are generally recovered with a core barrel that either has a disposable inner barrel or a disposable inner barrel liner. At the surface, the core barrel is separated from the coring assembly and placed on the drilling rig floor or other work area.
If the core material is unconsolidated, the core is “stabilized” to prevent mechanical damage caused by handling and shipment. Core stabilization may either be by freezing with dry ice to artificially consolidate the core, or by filling an annular space of the core barrel with a non-reactive core stabilizing compound, for example, epoxy or gypsum.
Thus, there is a need in the art for apparatus and methods that reduce the risk of core damage and the stabilization of core samples in inner barrels. In particular, there is a need in the art for techniques that reduce the movement and handling of the inner barrel, and the contained core in the stabilization process, and, which advantageously permits stabilization of the full length of the inner barrel without the need for segmenting the inner barrel and contained core sample.
Accordingly, example embodiments described relate to a core sampling apparatus and method for micro-coring unconsolidated sediments and in-situ sediment solidification with resin impregnation. The unconsolidated sediment can be loose sand or it can be soil in the vadose zone, with or without moisture. The corer is pushed into the sediment and retrieved largely undisturbed. The present core sampling apparatus allows in-situ resin impregnation such that the solidified core can be inspected and analyzed by different petrographic techniques depending on the type of data desired.
One example embodiment is a core sampling apparatus including a corer having an inner wall, an outer wall, and a plurality of impregnation tubes disposed between the inner and the outer wall. The impregnation tubes can be parallel to a central axis of the corer. Each of the plurality of impregnation tubes can have a plurality of holes. The inner wall may include a plurality of holes corresponding to the plurality of holes formed on the impregnation tubes, and the holes can be separated by a distance of 0.5 centimeters (cm) or more. The outer wall has a smooth outer surface to facilitate drilling into the sediment. The apparatus may further include a corer cap configured with a pump connection, the pump connection adapted to be connected to a vacuum pump for creating a vacuum to ease sampling of the core. The apparatus can also include a removable resin container, and a ring configured to connect to the removable resin container on top and the corer at the bottom, the ring including a plurality of inlets corresponding to the plurality of impregnation tubes in the corer. In one embodiment, the pump connection may be connected to a vacuum pump for facilitating resin impregnation and minimizing undesired air bubbles, or it may be used during drilling to facilitate the sampling process. The resin can include at least one of epoxy, vinylester, polyester, and combinations thereof. Alternatively, the apparatus may include a resin gun, and a ring configured to connect to the resin gun on top and the corer at the bottom, the ring including a plurality of inlets corresponding to the plurality of impregnation tubes in the corer. The apparatus can also include a core catcher attached to a lower end of the corer, the core catcher configured to collect and secure a core sample.
Another example embodiment is a method for sampling a core. The method can include extracting a core sample using a corer, and stabilizing, within the corer, unconsolidated sediment in the core sample. The apparatus can also include a core catcher attached to a lower end of the corer, the core catcher configured to collect and secure a core sample. The step of stabilizing unconsolidated sediment may include impregnating the core sample with a resin. The method can also include introducing the resin through a plurality of holes formed on an inner wall of the corer. The method can further include providing the corer with an outer wall, and disposing a plurality of impregnation tubes between the inner and the outer wall. In one embodiment, the impregnation tubes may be disposed parallel to a central axis of the corer. The method may also include providing each of the plurality of impregnation tubes with a plurality of holes. The plurality of holes on the inner wall correspond with the plurality of holes formed on the impregnation tubes, and vice versa. The method can also include providing a corer cap with a pump connection, and connecting the pump connection to a vacuum pump for creating a vacuum to ease sampling of the core. The method may also include removing the corer cap after the core sample has been collected, and connecting a removable resin container to the corer via a ring configured to connect to the removable resin container on top and the corer at the bottom, the ring including a plurality of inlets corresponding to the plurality of impregnation tubes in the corer. The method may further include providing the ring with a pump connection, and connecting the pump connection to a vacuum pump for facilitating resin impregnation and minimizing undesired air bubbles. Alternatively, the method may include removing the corer cap after the core sample has been collected, and connecting a resin gun to the corer via a ring configured to connect to the resin gun on top and the corer at the bottom, the ring including a plurality of inlets corresponding to the plurality of impregnation tubes in the corer.
So that the manner in which the features, advantages and objects of the example embodiments, as well as others which may become apparent, are attained and can be understood in more detail, more particular description of the example embodiments briefly summarized above may be had by reference to the embodiment which is illustrated in the appended drawings, which drawings form a part of this specification. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only example embodiments and is therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope as the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
The methods and systems of the present disclosure will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings in which embodiments are shown. The methods and systems of the present disclosure may be in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the illustrated embodiments set forth in this disclosure; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey its scope to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
Example embodiments described relate to a core sampling apparatus and method for micro-coring unconsolidated sediments and in-situ sediment solidification with resin impregnation. The unconsolidated sediment can be loose sand or it can be soil in the vadose zone, with or without moisture. Sediment is pushed into the corer and retrieved largely undisturbed. The present core sampling apparatus allows in-situ resin impregnation such that the solidified core can be inspected and analyzed by different petrographic techniques depending on the type of data desired.
Turning now to the figures,
In this way, a core stabilization apparatus and method are provided. A core sample within an inner wall may be stabilized using a resin mixture without first sectioning inner wall and enclosed core sample. The core sample is stabilized along the entire length of the inner wall by simultaneously injecting the resin into the wall through a plurality of ports provided in the inner wall. Delivery of the resin mixture to the injection ports is provided through a plurality of impregnation tubes disposed between the walls of the corer. Before injecting the resin mixture, drilling mud remaining within the inner wall is expelled using a displacing gas introduced into a plurality of vent ports provided in the inner wall. The vent ports also permit the displacement of gas within the inner wall void space during injection of the core stabilizing compound, and, additionally, allow for the escape of any excess resin supplied during the injection process. Although any resin known to one of skill in the art may be used for the purpose, epoxy, vinylester, polyester, and combinations thereof are just a few examples. In some embodiments, the resin may have a low viscosity, for example less than 600 cps, to enable easy impregnation into the sediment. The resin may also have a quick drying rate such that it stabilizes the sediment in less than two hours, or even in less than one hour.
The Specification, which includes the Summary, Brief Description of the Drawings and the Detailed Description, and the appended Claims refer to particular features (including process or method steps) of the disclosure. Those of skill in the art understand that the invention includes all possible combinations and uses of particular features described in the Specification. Those of skill in the art understand that the disclosure is not limited to or by the description of embodiments given in the Specification.
Those of skill in the art also understand that the terminology used for describing particular embodiments does not limit the scope or breadth of the disclosure. In interpreting the Specification and appended Claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context of each term. All technical and scientific terms used in the Specification and appended Claims have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs unless defined otherwise.
As used in the Specification and appended Claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The verb “comprises” and its conjugated forms should be interpreted as referring to elements, components or steps in a non-exclusive manner. The referenced elements, components or steps may be present, utilized or combined with other elements, components or steps not expressly referenced.
Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain implementations could include, while other implementations do not include, certain features, elements or operations. Thus, such conditional language generally is not intended to imply that features, elements or operations are in any way required for one or more implementations or that one or more implementations necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements or operations are included or are to be performed in any particular implementation.
The systems and methods described, therefore, are well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as others that may be inherent. While example embodiments of the system and method has been given for purposes of disclosure, numerous changes exist in the details of procedures for accomplishing the desired results. These and other similar modifications may readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the art, and are intended to be encompassed within the spirit of the system and method disclosed and the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1373492 | Dodds | Apr 1921 | A |
1784886 | Baker | Dec 1930 | A |
1896703 | Dean | Feb 1933 | A |
1987853 | Howard et al. | Jan 1935 | A |
2141261 | Clark | Dec 1938 | A |
2170716 | Higgins, Jr. | Aug 1939 | A |
2221392 | Baker | Nov 1940 | A |
2382992 | Harris | Aug 1945 | A |
2532716 | Havlick | Dec 1950 | A |
2698737 | Dean | Jan 1955 | A |
2740477 | Monaghan | Apr 1956 | A |
3064742 | Bridwell | Nov 1962 | A |
3066748 | Doherty | Dec 1962 | A |
3139147 | Hays et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
3146837 | Bridwell | Sep 1964 | A |
3163241 | Daigle et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3298450 | Sato | Jan 1967 | A |
3372760 | Raymond et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3438452 | Bernard et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3497018 | Shultz et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3794127 | Davis | Feb 1974 | A |
3807234 | Duperon | Apr 1974 | A |
3833075 | Bachman et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3878904 | Dobson | Apr 1975 | A |
3952817 | Anderson | Apr 1976 | A |
4081040 | Henson | Mar 1978 | A |
4234046 | Haynes | Nov 1980 | A |
4310057 | Brame | Jan 1982 | A |
4317490 | Milberger | Mar 1982 | A |
4335622 | Bartz | Jun 1982 | A |
4350051 | Thompson | Sep 1982 | A |
4356872 | Hyland | Nov 1982 | A |
4518050 | Sollie et al. | May 1985 | A |
4552229 | Radford et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4605075 | Radford et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4606416 | Knighton et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4607710 | Radford | Aug 1986 | A |
4669554 | Cordry | Jun 1987 | A |
4671367 | Brunsing | Jun 1987 | A |
4716974 | Radford | Jan 1988 | A |
4804050 | Kerfoot | Feb 1989 | A |
4807707 | Handley et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4930587 | Young et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946000 | Gibson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5101917 | Abdul et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5253720 | Radford et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5419211 | Rodel et al. | May 1995 | A |
5771985 | Jaworski | Jun 1998 | A |
6009960 | Leitko, Jr. et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6443243 | Griffin, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6659204 | Aumann et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
8684110 | Reid, Jr. et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9051800 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9322265 | Kong | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9506307 | Kinsella | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20030089526 | Beeker | May 2003 | A1 |
20030205408 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20080283298 | Garcia et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0588664 | Mar 1994 | EP |
2036451 | Dec 1970 | FR |
20030077055 | Oct 2003 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Gardner, Kenneth L.; “Impregnation technique using colored epoxy to define porosity in petrographic thin sections” Can. J. Earth Sci. vol. 17 1980; pp. 1104-1108. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International PCT application PCT/US2018/067485 (SA5795) report dated Apr. 2, 2019; pp. 1-11. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190195037 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |