The present invention relates generally to the field of computer-facilitated communications; more particularly, to instant messaging between users logged into a computer network.
A paramount concern in a modern enterprise is the ability to quickly respond to changing information. Electronic messaging systems such as instant messaging and e-mail have provided convenient tools for contacting people or groups of people efficiently. These systems provide a fast and inexpensive method for individuals to communicate and collaborate. Reliance on electronic communication has increased markedly in recent years. As technology advances, it is certain that organizations will become more dependent on immediate access to information to excel in a competitive environment.
It is also important for members of an organization to be able to effectively share identical screen images in real-time, such as text and graphics, among one or more client computers. Users typically share these images with one another using e-mail or instant message attachments. A practice known as “screen sharing” or “window sharing” is also used to allow for the display of identical information on computer screens or windows which are mutually connected in a distributed system. Nevertheless, these solutions have shortcomings. For one, instant messaging is not used for screen sharing. Instead, users are typically connected via a slow connect medium, which adversely affects the instantaneous quality of instant messaging. Furthermore, when users send large attachments, there is an overall slowdown in the speed and reliability of their networks as server capacity is consumed at high levels. In addition, instant messaging systems are generally not scalable. There is typically only one path for a message to take over a network, and past systems have lacked the intelligence to find a more optimum path for the instant messages.
Consequently, if there is too much traffic on a particular path, the recipient of an instant message may be subjected to a substantial delay.
Still another major shortcoming of existing instant messaging systems is that they do not provide a secure medium for confidential communication. Instant messaging has been traditionally conducted over the Internet, with communications sent via clear text. This type of insecure forum is often unacceptable for high-security business information. Finally, most instant messaging systems cannot track the presence of an individual throughout an organization. If an emergency happens within the organization, for example, there is no way to automatically alert the proper individuals using existing instant messaging technology.
What is needed is a comprehensive instant messaging system that allows for encrypted communication, collaborative screen sharing using the instant messaging system, and extensibility. Furthermore, an instant messaging system that is able to track the presence of individuals within an organization and to alert those individuals automatically if a predetermined event occurs would also be beneficial.
The present invention will be understood more fully from the detailed description that follows and from the accompanying drawings, which, however, should not be taken to limit the invention to the specific embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.
A system and method for instant messaging collaboration is described. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth, such as the architecture of a message center, details regarding particular types of instant messaging collaboration, and the use of the invention for sharing business reports, in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, persons having ordinary skill in the computer arts will appreciate that these specific details may not be needed to practice the present invention.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, an instant messaging system is provided that allows users to transmit messages instantaneously to any user located in a list of users contained in the instant messaging system. The system is able to track the presence of users that are using the instant message system within an organization, and to send users alerts about changing information within the organization. For example, if the instant messaging system is used in an oil refinery and there is a dangerous condition occurring in the refinery, an instant message may be sent to the appropriate people within the refinery so that they are able to immediately respond to the event. The system also provides for instant messaging through e-mail if users are not using the instant messaging system.
In one embodiment, the instant messaging system allows users to plug in their own security, such as bit encryption, so that confidential information may be transmitted between users in a highly secure manner. In another embodiment, a proprietary instant messenger allows for peer-to-peer collaboration, completely bypassing a server for instant messaging. In this manner, users of the system may communicate directly with one another and share identical screen images without having to communicate through the Internet, or with any other server, for that matter. If an image on one user's screen changes, this change may be streamed in real-time to all other participants in the instant messaging collaboration. The instant messaging system of the present invention is also extensible, such that message deliveries can be farmed out to back-up servers to send instant messages to users if network traffic necessitates this type of transmission.
Referring now to
As is known in the art, the existing enterprise systems contain a variety of different data about the organization. For example, the ERP system 102 may contain data regarding essential business functions including payroll, manufacturing, general ledger, and human resources, whereas the CRM system 103 may contain core information regarding the organization's customers. As data in these various systems changes (e.g., a sale is made, a new employee is hired, payroll is processed, etc.), one or more message queuing systems 107 may be used to allow these various applications 102, 103, 104, etc., to exchange information on the data being stored in their systems. To this end, one implementation of the present invention employs a message queue server (e.g., the Microsoft RTM message Queue Server (MSMQ) (not shown in this view), although other message queuing systems may be used as well, to provide loosely-coupled and reliable network (across servers) communication services based on a message-queuing model. In MSMQ, messages are sent to a queue, where the message is retained in storage until it is removed and used by another application. In this manner, loosely-coupled applications can share data to provide an enterprise-wide view of information, such as data and business transactions.
An enterprise link 110 is coupled to the enterprise computing runtime environment 101 through a network connection, such as the Internet 111. Of course, as is noted above, the network connection may also be a LAN, a WAN, a wireless network, or any other system of connections that allows one or more computers to exchange information. The enterprise link 110 integrates, in real-time, the disparate data in the message queues. The enterprise link 110 of the present invention is maintained active. It continuously accepts raw data feeds 121, 122, 123, etc., from the existing enterprise systems, and then reformats, synchronizes, and consolidates the data.
In a traditional model, the data in the message queues is usually processed through the dataflow system when a specified number of records had built up within the message queues (i.e., the data is then transmitted in batch mode). According to an algorithm contained within the data flow system of the present invention, however, individual records are processed through to the enterprise link 110 the moment that they appear; that is, the program continuously checks for new messages and handles them in real-time. In this manner, real-time data flow is transmitted through the raw data feeds 121, 122, 123 via the message queues.
It should be noted that although a message queuing system is used in one embodiment, the enterprise link 110 may also obtain data from the enterprise computing runtime environment 101 in a variety of other ways. These sources of data may be, for example, HyperText Transport Protocol (“HTTP”) requests and/or Application Programming Interface (“API”) calls and/or Web Services calls. In these alternative embodiments, the enterprise link 110 contains a web server (not shown in this view) to process the HTTP requests and/or another application or server to process the API and/or Web Service calls.
Regardless of how the enterprise link 110 receives the raw data feeds (e.g., 121-123) the enterprise link 110 transmits the data it receives from the enterprise computing runtime environment 101 via a network connection 160 to an active data cache (ADC) 120. Alternatively, the data may be transmitted to the ADC 120 via some other connection. The ADC 120 comprises a high-performance, memory-based persistent cache which stores the data (e.g., as shown by stars 131, 132, and 133) it receives from the enterprise link 110. The ADC 120 contains code which may be implemented in software such as Java™, Perl, C++, or other types of programming languages that can be stored on a computer-readable medium (e.g., a disk) to manage the data that is actively changing within the enterprise computing runtime environment 101 and to make the data accessible to the end-user in real-time. In this manner, the data represented by stars 131, 132, and 133 in the ADC 120 is constantly changing such that it is synchronized in real-time with the data in the enterprise computing runtime environment 101. The data 131, 132, and 133 in the ADC 120 may also be made persistent to disk 140, as disk 140 is optionally used for backup, restore, and recovery purposes.
An active designer 154 is the component module of the enterprise link 110 that determines the particular data that is contained within the ADC 120. Active designer 154 determines the process by which the data 131, 132, and 133 is transmitted to the ADC 120. As is shown in
By way of example, when sales data arrives at the ERP 102, the active designer 154 may contain a set of data flow definitions on how to retrieve, transform, and display this data. Each data flow definition may include executable software code instructing the enterprise link 110 to retrieve, by way of example, the data within the salesperson field whenever a sale is made, to describe how many sales that salesperson has made for the day, etc., and then to transmit this data to the ADC 120.
In the embodiment of
Referring now to
The presence component 209 may determine, for example, that a user is off-line, and therefore may not receive an instant message. The presence component may also determine that even though a user may not be using instant messaging, that the user has an e-mail address, where the instant message may be sent to be viewed the next time the user checks e-mail. The user manager 204 allows the server component 200 to obtain log-in information for various users. The user manager 204 also maintains lists of users that the server component 200 may communicate with via instant messaging. Local user information 205, including the name and e-mail address of users, may also be contained within the server component 200 of the message center architecture.
A variety of plug-ins 206, 207, and 208, may be connected to the message center 170 to allow the message center 170 to contact instant messaging users 220 and 230. In the embodiment illustrated by
Components of the enterprise computing runtime environment may use the event engine 202 to transmit messages through the API layer 201 directly to the Microsoft instant messaging server 210 through plug-in 208. The Microsoft instant messaging server 210 may then use the Internet 215 to transmit the instant message to a user 220. For instance, if an instant message needs to be sent to user 220 within an organization, the event engine 202 immediately transmits this message to the server component 200. The user manager 204 resolves the user's e-mail address on the Microsoft instant messaging server 210. The server component 200 employs the presence component 209 to determine whether or not user 220 is on-line. If user 220 is not on-line, then a message is transmitted back to the message center 170 indicating that the user is not on-line and thus cannot be contacted. Alternatively, the server component 200 may send the instant message to the user 220 via e-mail through the SMTP mail protocol plug-in 207 for the user 220 to receive next time the user checks his in-box. If the user 220 is on-line, however, then the plug-in 208 immediately transmits the message via the Internet 215 to the Microsoft instant messaging server 210. The Microsoft instant messaging server 210 then transmits the message to the user 220.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a user 230 may receive instant messages without using the Microsoft instant messaging server 210. For example, the proprietary instant messaging plug-in 206 allows instant messages to be transmitted from the event engine 202 to users who are logged into a proprietary server 240. If a message arrives at the server component 200 from the event engine 202 for the user 230, the user manager 204 is able to resolve the user's 230 e-mail address and transmit the message to the user 230 via the mail server plug-in 207. In addition, the message center is able to determine how the user 230 is logged on to the system. That is, it recognizes that the user 230 is logged on using the proprietary server 240 and therefore is able to send the message to the user 230 via the proprietary instant messaging plug-in 206.
Instant messages may be sent using the proprietary instant messaging plug-in 206 and the SMTP plug-in 207 simultaneously. Or, alternatively, an algorithm within the server component 200 may contain a set of rules to determine the best mode of instant message transmission. For example, if a message arrives at the message center for user 220, an algorithm may dictate that the instant message first try to be sent via the Microsoft instant messaging server 210, next through the proprietary server 240, and, if this fails, through the SMTP plug-in 207 via the mail server 211.
In another embodiment, an algorithm may be used to try to transmit the instant message through the proprietary server 240 first, the Microsoft instant messaging server 210 second, and the mail server 211 last. The proprietary server 240 may be connected to the server component 200 and to the users 230 and 220 via a standard Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) connection 216. Thus, the proprietary server 240 allows messages to be transmitted using bit-encryption or other highly secure transmission methods. The users 220 and 230 may also be connected to each other via the TCP/IP connections 216 and to the mail server 211 via the TCP/IP connection 216.
In addition, two components of the proprietary server 240 allow for the farming out of network traffic to multiple in-house servers. A presence component 251 of the proprietary server 240 is able to detect the presence of users 220 and 230 of the system, that is, whether or not users 220 and 230 are logged on to the proprietary server 240. A message component 252 of the proprietary server 240, handles message delivery to users 220 and 230.
If multiple messages are transmitted to the proprietary server 240 it may farm them out to back-up servers 241, 242, 243, etc., via the TCP/IP connection 216 located in-house if network traffic is too extensive. In this way, the instant messaging system is scalable. If hundreds of users in an organization need to receive an instant message, these messages may be farmed out to as many back-up servers 241, 242, 243, etc., as necessary and then transmitted to the appropriate users. Furthermore, users 220 and 230 may also communicate directly, without going through a proprietary server 240. This type of direct connection may be brokered by the proprietary server 240. In this case, the proprietary server 240 may set up a direct connection between user 220 and user 230 if the proprietary server is unable to connect to the users 220 and/or 230.
The proprietary server sets up with direct communication using an algorithm. According to the algorithm, the proprietary server 240 sends user 220 the IP address of user 230 (or vice versa). User 220 and user 230 then try to connect directly, bypassing the proprietary server for communication. If the communication is successful, the users 220 and 230 partake in instant message collaboration. If not, the instant message may be brokered back to the proprietary server 240. Thus, the instant messaging system can not only provide collaboration to users 220 and 230, the instant messaging system may also find the optimum path for the instant messages to use within the system.
Referring now to
In one example, the data may be in the form of a report 306 which is displayed in a specified format, such as a graph. The data may be active. That is, as data changes within the enterprise computing runtime environment these changes are immediately made available to the user 301 (or any user specified by the algorithm contained within the event engine) in real-time via the server component 320 of the message center. At this point, the user's 301 client computer is communicating directly with the server component 320 via connection 321.
Hosted inside the user's 301 client computer is the data. User 301 may click on the chat window to view the data on the user's client computer screen 304. Moreover, the user 301 may share the data with users 302 and 303 via the proprietary server 350. If the user 301 decides to share the data with users 302 and 303, the user 301 may use a viewer 335 to display a drop-down screen 340. A space 345 for text entry in the drop-down screen 340 is provided as well as a conversation window 355 to allow for instant messaging, that is, for “chatting” with users 302 and 303 via the proprietary server 350. The user 301 may send the data comprising the graphical report 306 in the form of an instant message to users 302 and 303 through the proprietary server 350. This message is streamed through the propriety server 350 via the instant messaging protocol. Icons appear on users' 302 and 303 client computer screens 370 and 371, indicating that they are the recipients of an instant message. When the users 302 and 303 click on the icons, they are able to see the exact data, in this example, the graphical report 306, that is shown on user's 301 computer screen. Users 302 and 303 are able to click on their viewers 375 and 385, to display drop-down screens 380 and 390. Spaces for text entry 381 and 391 and conversation windows 382 and 392 may be used to convey messages to users 301, 302, and 303 involved in the instant messaging collaboration in the manner described herein.
In addition, users 301, 302, and 303 are able to annotate the data in real-time in order to make changes to the data or insert comments. As a user 301, for example, annotates the data, the annotated data is streamed in real-time to users 302 and 303 who are involved in the instant messaging collaboration via the proprietary server 350. Furthermore, users 302 and/or 303 may also make changes to the data in real-time, which may be streamed through the proprietary server 350 to the users 301, 302, and 303.
Another feature of the present invention allows for client computers that have pen-enabled data input. For example, a user 301 may circle a portion of the graphical report 306 with a pen-type device coupled to user's 301 client computer. This circle appears in real-time on users' 302 and 303 computer screens in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Spaces for pen-enabled entries 346, 383, and 393, such as handwriting recognition windows, may be located on users 301, 302, and 303 drop-down screens 340, 380, and 390. This feature permits instant messaging collaboration to be conducted using tablet personal computers where the main data entry device is not a keyboard but, a pen-type device.
Referring now to
In this example, the first user decides to share the sales report with a second and third user, and thus selects the viewer feature on the user's computer screen (block 504). A drop-down menu is displayed on the first user's computer screen (block 505). The first user utilizes a keypad to type in a message in the conversation window of the drop-down menu and sends this message as well as the sales report to the second and third users through the proprietary server using the instant messaging protocol (block 506).
Continuing with this example, the second and third users receive the exact data that is displayed on the first user's computer screen (block 507). The first user annotates the sales data by using a pen-type device to circle a portion of the data (block 508). This change in the data is instantaneously streamed in real-time to the second and third users (block 509) who are involved in an instant messaging collaboration via the proprietary server with the first user. The second and third users use drop-down menus on their respective computer screens to communicate with the users involved in the collaboration (block 510). The second and third users make changes to the active data report, pen-enabled or otherwise (block 511). These changes are streamed to the users involved in the instant messaging collaboration (block 512).
A flow chart illustrating one example operation according to one embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Referring now to
A display device 806 for providing visual output is also coupled to bus 801 for communicating information and command selections to processor 802. Keyboard 807 is coupled to bus 801 for communicating information and command selections to processor 802. Another type of input device is cursor control unit 808, which may be a device such as a mouse or trackball, for communicating direction commands that control cursor movement on display 809.
For example, the cursor control unit 808 may be used to click on a box that will display the instant messages and/or active data transmitted to the computer system 800. Yet another type of input device is a pen-type device 810, for making pen-enabled annotations to a document or for entering messages in handwriting recognition windows (not shown in this view) on drop-down menus on the display 809.
Processor 802 is shown coupled through bus 801 to an input/output (I/O) interface 811, which can be used to control and transfer data to electronic devices connected to computer 800, such as other computers, tape records, and the like.
Network interface device 812 is coupled to bus 801 and provides a physical and logical connection between computer system 800 and network medium, such as the Internet. Depending on the network environment in which computer 800 is used, this connection is typically to a server computer, but it can also be to a network router or to another client computer. Note that the architecture of
In the foregoing, a system and method for instant messaging collaboration has been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it should be understood that numerous changes in the disclosed embodiments can be made in accordance with the disclosure herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The preceding description, therefore, is not meant to limit the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined only by the appended claims and their equivalents.
The present application is a divisional of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/289,162, filed Nov. 5, 2002, entitled “Apparatus and Method For Instant Messaging Collaboration,” which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/410,989, filed Sep. 16, 2002, entitled “Business Intelligence System,” all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4403286 | Fry et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
5010478 | Deran | Apr 1991 | A |
5033009 | Dubnoff | Jul 1991 | A |
5283894 | Deran | Feb 1994 | A |
5289372 | Guthrie et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5510980 | Peters | Apr 1996 | A |
5544329 | Engel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553215 | Kaethler | Sep 1996 | A |
5592608 | Weber et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5613131 | Moss et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615362 | Jensen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5654726 | Mima et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5717895 | Leedom et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721847 | Johnson | Feb 1998 | A |
5754774 | Bittinger et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758337 | Hammond | May 1998 | A |
5765164 | Prasad et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778372 | Cordell et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781911 | Young et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784275 | Sojoodi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787409 | Seiffert et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5809267 | Moran et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812840 | Schwartz | Sep 1998 | A |
5831609 | London et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5831615 | Drews et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835721 | Donahue et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5857201 | Wright, Jr. et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862325 | Reed et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864669 | Osterman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5881239 | Desgrousilliers | Mar 1999 | A |
5890174 | Khanna et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893126 | Drews et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893150 | Hagersten et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898434 | Small et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5918009 | Gehani et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922044 | Banthia | Jul 1999 | A |
5926177 | Hatanaka et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928327 | Wang et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930794 | Linenbach et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943620 | Boltz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5974236 | Sherman | Oct 1999 | A |
6023694 | Kouchi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025844 | Parsons | Feb 2000 | A |
6031978 | Cotner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035324 | Chang | Mar 2000 | A |
6038558 | Powers et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055548 | Comer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070197 | Cobb et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073242 | Hardy et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075530 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088481 | Okamoto et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092102 | Wagner | Jul 2000 | A |
6094681 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6112236 | Dollin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125177 | Whittaker | Sep 2000 | A |
6141659 | Barker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6170019 | Dresel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175859 | Mohler | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182116 | Namma et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185582 | Zellweger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189069 | Parkes et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201539 | Miller et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204846 | Little et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205474 | Hurley | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208990 | Suresh et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219042 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226750 | Trieger | May 2001 | B1 |
6233578 | Machihara et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239797 | Hills et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240444 | Fin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243698 | Powers et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243713 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256649 | Mackinlay et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256676 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260114 | Schug | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269393 | Yost et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301601 | Helland et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304546 | Natarajan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314463 | Abbott et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317737 | Gorelik et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336135 | Niblett et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341312 | French et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348933 | Walls et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363363 | Haller et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6393421 | Paglin | May 2002 | B1 |
6397217 | Melbin | May 2002 | B1 |
6430576 | Gates et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430604 | Ogle et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449344 | Goldfinger et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467052 | Kaler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480847 | Linenbach et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501956 | Weeren et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510457 | Ayukawa et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513047 | Talley | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519568 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519601 | Bosch | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523046 | Liu et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6532465 | Hartley et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535227 | Fox et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542165 | Ohkado | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546425 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567796 | Yost et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567814 | Bankier et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574618 | Eylon et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6574639 | Carey et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591277 | Spence et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591278 | Ernst | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598167 | Devine et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606596 | Zirngibl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6640234 | Coffen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647272 | Asikainen | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651055 | Kilmer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651142 | Gorelik et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654790 | Ogle et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664978 | Kekic et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668173 | Greene | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678719 | Stimmel | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687360 | Kung et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701485 | Igra et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714982 | McDonough et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731314 | Cheng et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745193 | Horvitz et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766418 | Alexander et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775267 | Kung et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775298 | Aggarwal | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782424 | Yodaiken | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789083 | Thelen | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6789090 | Miyake et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792456 | Hellerstein et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807562 | Pennock et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807583 | Hrischuk et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6832341 | Vijayan | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839737 | Friskel | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6898625 | Henry et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901592 | Mar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907422 | Predovic | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6915457 | Miller | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6920607 | Ali et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6937713 | Kung et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938221 | Nguyen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941345 | Kapil et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941351 | Vetrivelkumaran et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954757 | Zargham et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954902 | Noma et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6996768 | Elo et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003568 | Chikada et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003731 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7024474 | Clubb et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7028092 | MeLampy et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031314 | Craig et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032006 | Zhuk | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035923 | Yoakum et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7058953 | Willard et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7089311 | Devine et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096432 | Huapaya et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113934 | Levesque et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113964 | Bequet et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120139 | Kung et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7139797 | Yoakum et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7171473 | Eftis et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7174339 | Wucherer et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7177909 | Stark et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188160 | Champagne et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197565 | Abdelaziz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7221658 | Armstrong et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7222294 | Coffen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233979 | Dickerman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243124 | Gardner et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7243127 | Tabayoyon, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7243130 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269625 | Willhide et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7269627 | Knauerhase | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272660 | Powers et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7275215 | Werndorfer et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283805 | Agrawal | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284034 | Matsa et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296217 | Earnshaw et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7299257 | Boyer et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310532 | Knauerhase et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313593 | Pulito et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313617 | Malik et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7353455 | Malik | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359938 | Davies et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7373428 | Armstrong et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7379963 | Khare et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7386588 | Mousseau et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389351 | Horvitz | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392478 | Aureglia et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398327 | Lee | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7401158 | Beauchamp et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406569 | van de Waerdt | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412481 | Nicholls et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412486 | Petrack et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7412518 | Duigou et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7412645 | Kotler et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415502 | Vishik et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7426059 | Broda et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433922 | Engstrom | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436939 | Packingham | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7436947 | Ordille et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454423 | Powers et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461378 | Beyda | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7464139 | Malik | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7487437 | Aureglia et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7552204 | Bobde et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554938 | Smith et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7627666 | DeGiulio et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7631047 | Adamczyk | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7657616 | Poling et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7664817 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668915 | Couts et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668917 | Netsch et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7725523 | Bolnick et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7814208 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7899879 | Broda | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904823 | Beauchamp et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912899 | Beauchamp et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925771 | Ping et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7936815 | Dankworth et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7941542 | Broda et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7945846 | Beauchamp et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8001185 | Nicholls et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8165993 | Broda et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8255454 | Broda | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010034733 | Prompt et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039616 | Kumagai et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010040945 | Fujino et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049683 | Yoshikawa | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049721 | Blair et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013853 | Baber et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023143 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032602 | Lanzillo et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038217 | Young | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038362 | Bhatia et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020056000 | Coussement | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057657 | La Porta et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057678 | Jiang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059425 | Belfiore et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059472 | Wollrath et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065894 | Dalal et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073236 | Helgeson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075303 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078208 | Crump et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083067 | Tamayo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083072 | Steuart | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083118 | Sim | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095465 | Banks et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103909 | Devine et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107864 | Battas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107905 | Roe et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107957 | Zargham et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116362 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116461 | Diacakis et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120697 | Generous et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120765 | Boehmke | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138640 | Raz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143710 | Liu | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147777 | Hackbarth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152402 | Tov et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165849 | Singh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178035 | Lajouanie | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178353 | Graham | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184187 | Bakalash et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194393 | Hrischuk et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198985 | Fraenkel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199203 | Duffy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004742 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009603 | Ruths et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014513 | Ruths et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018719 | Ruths et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023691 | Knauerhase | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028597 | Salmi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028682 | Sutherland | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028683 | Yorke et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033329 | Bergman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037103 | Salmi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037113 | Petrovykh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041108 | Henrick et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030071850 | Geidi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074393 | Peart | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088633 | Chiu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093585 | Allan | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101201 | Saylor et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101223 | Pace et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105837 | Kamen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110249 | Buus et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112948 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115186 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120805 | Couts et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126136 | Omoigui | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131069 | Lucovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131142 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154177 | Holland et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158873 | Sawdon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182428 | Li et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182461 | Stelting et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187971 | Uliano et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204741 | Schoen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208543 | Enete et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217081 | White et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217142 | Bobde et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218631 | Malik | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220860 | Heytens et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229722 | Beyda | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235279 | Richomme | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002360 | Chun et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040002958 | Seshadri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003090 | Deeds | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010543 | Grobman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019695 | Fellenstein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024822 | Werndorfer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030762 | Silverthorne et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031054 | Dankworth et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039776 | Ballard | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039800 | Black et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049477 | Powers et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054802 | Beauchamp et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040060001 | Coffen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073596 | Kloninger et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080504 | Salesky et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087300 | Lewis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040146044 | Herkerdorf et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152477 | Wu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040254998 | Horvitz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004984 | Simpson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055329 | Bakalash et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086211 | Mayer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102294 | Coldewey | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102611 | Chen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114534 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125377 | Kotler | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144114 | Ruggieri et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187982 | Sato | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060089939 | Broda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060161540 | Schmitz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206589 | Lentini et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060259626 | Stone-Kaplan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070192495 | Marais | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080004904 | Tran | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043256 | Broda et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046505 | Netsch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046506 | Broda | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046510 | Beauchamp et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046536 | Broda | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046556 | Nicholls et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046568 | Broda et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046803 | Beauchamp et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046837 | Beauchamp et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077656 | Broda | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080148289 | Nicholls et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080209490 | Dankworth et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090031205 | Aureglia et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037803 | Bauchot | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110167169 | Ping et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120060078 | Beauchamp et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0163466 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Long, Allan Christian et al., “PDA and Gesture Use in Practice: Insights for Designers of Pen-based User Interfaces,” University of California at Berkeley, 1997. |
“Middleware—The Essential Component for Enterprise Client/Server Applications,” International Systems Group, Inc., Feb. 1997. |
Pioch, Nicholas, “A Short IRC Primer,” Jan. 1, 1997. |
Stephanidis, Constantine et al., “Design Representations and Development Support for User Interface Adaptation,” Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology, 1995. |
“An Introduction to Messaging and Queuing,” IBM Corp., Jun. 1995. |
“Relational OLAP: An Enterprise-Wide Data Delivery Architecture,” MicroStrategy, Inc., 1994. |
“Guidelines for Implementing and Using the NBS Data,” Federal Information Processing Standards, Publication 74, Apr. 1, 1981. |
“ILOG Views 2D Graphics: The C++ Library for Interactive 2D Graphics,” ILOG. |
“Sametime 3 Features and Benefits,” IBM. |
“Scripting Support for Web Page Printing Sample,” Microsoft Corp., 2004. |
Oikarinen, Jarkko et al., “Internet Relay Chat Protocol,” Network Working Group, May 1993. |
“Report of Novelty Search,” PATENTEC, dated Oct. 16, 2003. |
Using Microsoft Excel 97 Manual. Bestseller Edition. Que Corporation, 1997. |
Microsoft Excel Print Screen Images (figs. 1-6). |
“Introduction to Dynamic HTML,” http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms533044(d=printer).aspx, downloaded Jul. 17, 2007. |
Excel 2000, publ. by Microsoft in 1999, screen captures pp. 1-12. |
Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition), Oct. 6, 2000, printed from w3.org. |
Ünal, A., “Electronic Commerce and Multi-enterprise Supply/Value/Business Chains,” Information Sciences, Aug. 2000, pp. 63-68, vol. 127, Issues 1-2, NH Elsevier. |
Karn, P. et al., “The ESP Triple DES Transform,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 1851, Category: Experimental, Sep. 1995, pp. 1-11. |
Goldsmith, D. et al., “UTF-7: A Mail-Safe Transformation Format of Unicode,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2152, Obsoletes: RFC 1642, Category: Informational, May 1997, pp. 1-15. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/035,376, mailed Jan. 25, 2011, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, mailed Dec. 30, 2010, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, mailed Jan. 4, 2011, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231: Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 5, 2010, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,134: Final Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2010, 25 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441: Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2010, 31 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073: Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 27, 2010, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/035,376 mailed Mar. 18, 2011, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544 mailed Oct. 28, 2010, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441 mailed Mar. 7, 2011, 30 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441 mailed May 18, 2011, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, filed Dec. 12, 2005, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 2, 2010, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, filed Dec. 12, 2005, Office Action mailed Aug. 9, 2011, 35 pages. |
“Report of Novelty Search,” PATENTEC, dated Apr. 4, 2004. |
“Steel-Belted Radius/Enterprise Edition,” Funk Software, Inc., 2004. |
“Jabber: About: Technology Overview,” Jabber Software Foundation, Dec. 12, 2003. |
Smith, Jan, “Browser Basics: Printing,” http://www.jegsworks.com/Lessons/web/basics/printing,htm, Feb. 10, 2003. |
Perfetti, Christine et al., “Macromedia Flash: A New Hope for Web Applications.” User Interface Engineering, 2002. |
Weiss, Aaron, “The Document Object Model Dissected,” Jupitermedia Corporation, 2002. |
“Protecting the Enterprise from Rogue Protocols,” Akonix Systems, Inc., 2002. |
“Informatica Applications: Leverage Your Enterprise Information for Better Decision Making,” Informatica Corporation, 2002. |
“Informatica Applications: Informatica Customer Relationship Analytics,” Informatica Corporation, 2002. |
“Brocade Rapidly Implements Customer and Sales Analytics,” Informatica Corporation, 2002. |
Howlett, Dennis et al., “Delivering Value Back to the Business: A Guide to Successful Portal Selection and Implementation.” TIBCO Software, 2002. |
“Sametime for iSeries 2.5,” Lotus Software, IBM Corporation, 2002. |
“Business Intelligence Software: Engendering a Quiet Revolution in the Business Place,” MicroStrategy, Dec. 20, 2002. |
Woods, Bob, “CypherGuard Secures MSN, Windows IM,” JupiterMedia Corporation, Oct. 3, 2002. |
“Business Transformation Through End-to-End Integration,” IBM, Aug. 2002. |
“The Sagent Analytic Advantage,” Sagent Technology Inc., May 2002. |
Watson, Hugh J., “Recent Developments in Data Warehousing,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, pp. 1-25, vol. 8, 2001. |
“The Business Intelligence Industry's Leading Products and Services,” Business Objects, 2001. |
Brewster, Stephen, “Windowing Systems,” Glasgow Interactive Systems Group, 2001. |
“Express Communicator,” White Paper, ACD Systems Ltd., May 2001. |
“Business Rules Powering Business and E-Business,” White Paper, ILOG, May 2001. |
“A Data Warehouse Tutorial,” Paretoanalysts, Dec. 27, 2001. |
“The Sagent Performance Story,” Sagent Technology, Inc., Oct. 2001. |
“Achieving Global Business Visibility With the webMethods Integration Platform,” webMethods, Inc., Sep. 2001. |
Bernstein, Philip A. et al., “Data Warehouse Scenarios for Model Management,” Microsoft Corporation, 2000. |
“Implementing the RosettaNet eBusiness Standard: Automating High-tech Supply Chains Using Business Ware for RosettaNet,” Vitria Technology Inc., 2000. |
Wang, Wenjie et al., “Instant Messaging Insight,” Computer Science Department, New York Unuversity, Nov. 22, 2000. |
“X Window System: Getting Started,” Stanford University, Oct. 26, 2000. |
Day, Mark et al., “A Model for Presences and Instant Messaging,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments 2778, The Internet Society, Feb. 2000. |
“The Basics of the Browser,” Santa Clara County Office of Education Internet Institutue (SCCOE), 1999. |
Corke, Randy, “Keeping Data Warehouse Current: Automating Incremental Updates with Data Movement,” DM Direct, May 1999. |
Moran, Brian et al., “Getting to Know OLAP and MDX,” Windows IT Pro, Instant Doc #5112, Apr. 1999. |
Handley, Mark et al., “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments 2543, The Internet Society, Mar. 1999. |
“MQSeries Link for R/3,” IBM, 1998. |
Tsai, Michael, “The Personal Computing Paradigm,” ATPM Inc., 1998. |
Schoedl, Arno, “Issues for Implementing User Interface Software,” Georgia Institute of Technology, Sep. 26, 1998. |
“Print Without Pop Up Window Using Javascript,” Experts Exchange, posted Nov. 3, 2002. |
“Adding Printing Capabilities,” Interactivetools.com, posted Oct. 19, 2002. |
Loo, Thomas et al., “How Can I Print a Document That is Not Currently Loaded Into a Frame or Window?” Synop Software, Apr. 24, 2002. |
Howlett, Jake, “Further Control of Printing,” Codestore, Jan. 3, 2002. |
Cimino, Steve, “How Can I Print a Web Page in ASP?”, Internet.com Corp., posted Jul. 27, 2001. |
“JavaScript: MSIE 5 Unable to Print Child Window.” Experts Exhange, posted Jun. 7, 2000. |
Nonsenko, Andrew, “Scripting Support for Web Page Printing,” Microsoft Corporation, Mar. 28, 2000. |
Movva, Ramu et al., “MSM Messenger Service 1.0 Protocol,” Internet Draft, Aug. 1999. |
Richardson, Tristan et al., “The RFB Protocol,” ORL Cambridge, Jul. 16, 1998. |
Gwinn, Allen, “Simple Network Paging Protocol—Version 3—Two-Way Enhanced,” Network Working Group, Oct. 1995. |
Dabke, P, “Enterprise Integration Via Corba-Based Information Agents,” IEEE Internet Computing, Sep./Oct. 1999, pp. 49-57, vol. 3, Issue 5. |
Habraken, J. “Ten Minute Guide to Microsoft Excel 2002,” Sep. 27, 2001, Que, Section, “Lesson 6, Performing Calculations with Functions.” |
Roman, S. “Writing Excel Macros with VBA: Second Edition,” Jun. 25, 2002, Chapter 6: Functions and Subroutines. |
Anton, Jesse et al., “Web Catching for Database Applications with Oracle Cache”, Jun. 4-6, 2002, pp. 594-599. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559, dated Feb. 1, 2008; 12 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated Jan. 29, 2008; 14 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated Jul. 28, 2008, 12 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,162, dated Nov. 30, 2007; 12 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231, dated Nov. 6, 2008, 10 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231 dated Apr. 30, 2009, 10 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Mar. 5, 2009, 19 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Sep. 4, 2009, 24 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Jan. 4, 2008; 8 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Sep. 12, 2008, 10 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Feb. 12, 2009, 8 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Jul. 30, 2009, 9 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Sep. 18, 2009, 3 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, dated Oct. 6, 2008, 20 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, dated May 13, 2009, 18 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, dated Oct. 27, 2009, 20 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 15 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544, dated Aug. 28, 2009, 18 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, dated Feb. 5, 2008, 19 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, dated Sep. 11, 2009, 22 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Sep. 1, 2005, 15 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated May 18, 2006, 13 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Feb. 21, 2007, 16 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Jun. 25, 2007, 17 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Jan. 9, 2008, 16 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Sep. 3, 2008, 17 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Nov. 3, 2008, 3 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Sep. 4, 2009, 24 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Dec. 14, 2009, 25 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231, dated Dec. 9, 2005, 17 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231, dated Apr. 11, 2006, 15 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231, dated Nov. 30, 2006, 13 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231, dated Apr. 16, 2007, 15 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231, dated Apr. 15, 2008, 12 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231, dated Dec. 14, 2009, 9 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated May 18, 2006; 11 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated Mar. 27, 2007; 12 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated May 31, 2007; 3 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated Aug. 6, 2007; 11 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated Apr. 14, 2008; 3 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated Jan. 6, 2009; 11 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated Jun. 11, 2009; 9 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,155, dated Sep. 29, 2009; 7 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, dated Jul. 20, 2007, 9 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, dated Mar. 19, 2008, 12 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, dated Jul. 21, 2008, 3 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, dated Jul. 20, 2009, 3 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544, dated Sep. 8, 2006, 12 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544, dated Dec. 3, 2008, 6 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544, dated Feb. 3, 2009, 16 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544, dated Dec. 11, 2009, 2 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544, dated Mar. 25, 2010, 12 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,665, dated Dec. 7, 2006, 8 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,665, dated May 9, 2007, 7 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, dated Oct. 3, 2008, 18 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, dated Dec. 16, 2008, 3 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, dated Feb. 4, 2009, 19 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, dated Jan. 5, 2010, 27 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Feb. 8, 2007; 7 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Jun. 21, 2007; 7 pages total. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Oct. 28, 2008; 3 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Jan. 19, 2010; 9 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,134, dated Jun. 3, 2010; 21 pages total. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,231, dated Apr. 12, 2010, 12 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Jun. 17, 2010, 28 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Jun. 17, 2010; 9 pgs. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,073, dated Aug. 23, 2010; 2 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,128, dated Jul. 7, 2010, 25 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,544, dated Aug. 13, 2010, 10 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, dated Jun. 25, 2010, 28 pages total. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,978, dated Jun. 17, 2010, 28 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,139 dated Dec. 9, 2005, 14 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,139 dated Apr. 11, 2006, 16 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,139 dated Nov. 30, 2006, 14 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,139 dated May 1, 2007, 6 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,142 dated Dec. 20, 2005, 9 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,142 dated Apr. 24, 2006, 12 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,142 dated Dec. 4, 2006, 9 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,142 dated May 30, 2007, 10 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,142 dated Jan. 4, 2008, 9 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,142 dated May 2, 2008, 5 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,945 dated Feb. 9, 2007, 8 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,945 dated Jul. 5, 2007, 9 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,945 dated Jan. 9, 2008, 7 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/390,945 dated Jun. 9, 2008, 7 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,162 dated Dec. 21, 2005, 12 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,162 dated Apr. 20, 2007, 8 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,162 dated Nov. 30, 2007, 12 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/289,162 dated Apr. 16, 2008, 17 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559 dated Jan. 31, 2005, 11 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559 dated Aug. 8, 2005, 11 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559 dated Dec. 30, 2005, 10 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559 dated Jan. 11, 2007, 10 pages total. |
Final Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559 dated Aug. 15, 2007, 13 pages total. |
Advisory Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559 dated Oct. 25, 2007, 3 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559 dated Feb. 1, 2008, 12 pages total. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,559 dated Aug. 21, 2008, 9 pages total. |
Office Action of U.S. Appl. No. 12/035,376 dated Sep. 15, 2010, 9 pages total. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,134, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2012, 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,665, filed May 30, 2003, Notice of Allowance mailed May 30, 2012, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,441, filed Dec. 12, 2005, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 19, 2011, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,665, filed May 30, 2003, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 10, 2012, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,665, filed May 30, 2003, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 7, 2012, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080155020 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60410989 | Sep 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10289162 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 12039471 | US |