The present application is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/KR2019/010306 filed on Aug. 13, 2019, which claims the benefit of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2019-0031341, filed on Mar. 19, 2019, with the Korean Intellectual Property Office, the entire contents of each hereby incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates to an inverter control apparatus and an inverter control method.
In alternating-current (AC) motor systems, digital inverters are becoming common due to the development of microprocessors and various sensors. In this case, when an instantaneous torque of a motor is controlled, magnetic flux reference control referred to as vector control is mainly applied, and performance of vector control can be determined by current control performance of the digital inverter.
Meanwhile, in the digital inverter, a sampling frequency is limited due to problems including an arithmetic operation time of a controller and heat of a power device. Therefore, when the sampling frequency of the digital inverter is not sufficiently greater than a rotation frequency of the motor, current control performance tends to be degraded or unstable. This problem is prominent in large-capacity systems or high-speed operation systems using permanent magnet motors.
That is, in a motor control system in which a sampling period is not sufficiently short, accuracy of modeling for the system is decreased, and thus there is a problem in that convergence of the inverter system on a command is degraded and a stable operating range is limited.
The present disclosure is directed to providing an inverter control apparatus and an inverter control method which improve modeling accuracy of a motor control system and secure command convergence performance and stability of an inverter.
One aspect of the present disclosure provides an inverter control method including determining a first voltage equation for a motor on a stationary coordinate system in a continuous time domain, reflecting a zero-order hold (ZOH) and a time delay to the first voltage equation and determining a second voltage equation, discretizing the second voltage equation and determining a third voltage equation, reflecting a rotor position and a speed of the motor and determining a fourth voltage equation on a synchronous coordinate system in a discrete time domain, determining a transfer function of a current control closed-loop on the synchronous coordinate system in the discrete time domain from a transfer function of a current control response characteristic in the discrete time domain, and determining a transfer function of current control to be provided to an inverter using the transfer function of the current control closed-loop and the fourth voltage equation.
The first voltage equation may be determined by the following equation:
wherein, in this case, Gp(s) may denote the voltage equation on the stationary coordinate system, Vdqss may denote an input voltage on the stationary coordinate system, idqss may denote an output current on the stationary coordinate system, Rs may denote rotor resistance of the motor, and Ls may denote rotor inductance of the motor.
The second voltage equation may be determined by the following equation:
wherein, in this case, GZOH(s) may denote a transfer function to which the ZOH is reflected, Gd(s) may denote a transfer function to which the time delay is reflected, and Tsamp may denote a sampling period.
The third voltage equation may be determined by the following equation:
wherein, in this case, ωe may denote a rotor speed of the motor.
The fourth voltage equation may be determined by the following equation:
The current control response characteristic in the discrete time domain may be designed using a low-pass filter, and the current control response characteristic may be determined by the following equation:
wherein, in this case, K may denote a dynamic characteristic of an actual current with respect to a current command.
The transfer function of the current control may be determined by the following equation:
An inverter control method of determining a transfer function of current control, which is a control signal in a discrete time domain, so as to turn a plurality of switching devices, each outputting an alternating-current (AC) voltage of an inverter, on and off, the inverter control method comprising: discretizing a voltage equation for a motor on a stationary coordinate system, in which a zero-order hold (ZOH) and a delay are reflected, in a continuous time domain, and reflecting a rotor position and a speed of the motor and determining a voltage equation of the motor on a synchronous coordinate system in a discrete time domain.
In accordance with the present disclosure, coordinate transformation is performed in a discrete time domain during system modeling so that there is an effect in that a sampling effect can be reflected in the system modeling and a current command convergence and stability can be improved.
In order to fully convey a configuration and an effect of the present disclosure, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the present disclosure is not limited to the embodiments described below but may be implemented in various forms and various modifications may be made. However, the description of the present embodiment is intended to provide a complete disclosure of the present disclosure and to fully disclose the scope of the present disclosure to a person ordinary skilled in the art to which the present disclosure belongs. In the accompanying drawings, components are enlarged in size for convenience of description, and a scale of each of the components can be exaggerated or reduced.
The terms “first,” “second,” and the like can be used to describe various components, but the components should not be limited by these terms. These terms may be used only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another component. For example, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure, a first component may be referred to as a second component, and similarly, the second component may also be referred to as the first component. In addition, the singular form includes the plural form unless the context clearly notes otherwise. Unless otherwise defined, the terms used in the embodiments of the present disclosure may be construed as commonly known to those skilled in the art.
Hereinafter, control of a conventional digital inverter will be described with reference to
In a general inverter control system 100, a discrete time converter 110 converts continuous time input signals, such as a voltage, a current, and a rotation speed which are generated by a motor, into discrete time signals by a sample-and-hold method. The sample-and-hold method is a method of memorizing a certain signal and holding the certain signal until the next signal to be memorized is input and is a common method of converting a continuous time signal into a discrete time signal.
An analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 120 quantizes the discrete time signal to allow the discrete time signal to be arithmetically processed. The above-described quantized signal is output as another quantized signal through various arithmetic operation processes of the controller 130 and is finally converted into a continuous time output signal through a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 140 to be output. This output signal is input to the motor to serve to control a control variable.
In describing the signal processing process of the inverter in terms of an input and an output, the signal processing process refers to a composite system in which a continuous time domain and a discrete time domain are mixed. Thus, it is difficult to define a relationship between an input signal and an output signal of the inverter. However, assuming that a unit of discrete time, that is, a sampling period of the system, is sufficiently fast, an operation for a discrete time domain may be regarded as a continuous time domain, and thus as shown in
However, in the case of a high-speed current control system in which a sampling period is not sufficiently fast, since an operation of the digital inverter in a discrete time domain cannot be regarded as the inverter controller 300 in a continuous time domain as shown in
Therefore, in order to derive the relationship between an input and an output including an operation in a discrete time domain, one among methods of mathematically modeling a discrete phenomenon in the continuous time domain is a zero-order hold (ZOH) method.
When the sampling period is Tsamp, a transfer function of the ZOH method is expressed as Equation 1 below in a continuous time frequency domain.
In this case, s denotes an operator corresponding to the Laplace transform, is used to convert a time function including a differentiation into a frequency domain, and operates in the continuous time domain.
Meanwhile, in the current control loop of the digital inverter, current information is measured and updated every sampling period.
For the current measured and updated every sampling period Tsamp, an arithmetic operation necessary for current control is performed in the controller of the inverter during the sampling period Tsamp In addition, before the next sampling period arrives, an arithmetic operation of the controller on a pulse width modulation (PWM) switching indicating an output of the inverter is completed and output during the next period.
Thus, in terms of calculating an output with respect to the measured input current, a time delay corresponding to the sampling period occurs. Similar to the ZOH method, an effect of the time delay can be ignored when the sampling period is sufficiently fast, whereas the effect cannot be ignored in the high-speed current control system.
Therefore, the time delay effect should be reflected, and a transfer function for the time delay effect is expressed as Equation 2 below using the Laplace transform in the continuous time frequency domain.
Gd=e−sT
As described in Equations 1 and 2, the digital inverter has the ZOH and time delay characteristics, and in consideration of these characteristics, a relational expression for input and output signals of the digital inverter of
When a transfer function for a control algorithm of the controller to be implemented in the digital inverter is defined as Gc(s) through the Laplace transform, the entire signal processing for the input and output of the digital inverter, including the discrete time operation of the digital inverter, is shown in
Therefore, the final relational expression for the input and output of the digital inverter may be integrated in the continuous time domain to be expressed as Equation 3, and when a control algorithm Gc(s) of a controller 510 is designed in the form of Equation 3, ZOHs and time delays of a ZOH unit 520 and a time delay unit 530 of the digital inverter 500 should be reflected.
Therefore, it can be said that the performance of the inverter control apparatus depends on accuracy of the modeling even for the same motor.
That is, in terms of the control algorithm of the controller 510, it can be seen that a control closed loop block diagram may be represented to be modified into one block 620 by combining a motor modeling unit 610 of the motor 600 into items obtained by considering the ZOH and the time delay.
Generally, the three-phase alternating-current (AC) motor 600 is modeled in the form of d-axis and q-axis signals through coordinate transformation. There are various types of the AC motor 600. Among the various types of the AC motor 600, an example of a surface-attached permanent magnet motor will be described.
An output voltage equation of the motor is expressed as a voltage equation of the motor in a continuous-time stationary coordinate system as in Equation 4 below.
In Equation 4, Vdss denotes a d-axis input voltage on the stationary coordinate system, Vqss denotes a q-axis input voltage on the stationary coordinate system, idss denotes a d-axis output current on the stationary coordinate system, and iqss denotes a q-axis output current on the stationary coordinate system. In addition, Rs denotes resistance of a motor stator, Ls denotes inductance of the motor stator, λPM denotes magnetic flux interlinkage of a permanent magnet, and θr denotes a position of the permanent magnet of the motor.
Alternatively, the voltage equation on the synchronous coordinate system may also be obtained in the form of Equation 6 through coordinate transformation synchronized with the position of the motor expressed as Equation 5.
In this case, Vdse denotes a d-axis input voltage on the synchronous coordinate system, Vqse denotes a q-axis input voltage on the synchronous coordinate system, idse denotes a d-axis output current on the synchronous coordinate system, and iqse denotes a q-axis output current on the synchronous coordinate system. In addition, θe denotes a position of the motor rotor, and ωe denotes a speed of the motor rotor.
That is, various types of expressions are possible for the same motor.
When the Laplace transform is applied to the voltage equations of Equations 4 and 6 to obtain a relational expression of an output current to a voltage input of the motor, the relational expression may be expressed as transfer functions of Equations 7 and 8.
On the basis of the modeling of the motor 610 as in Equation 7 or Equation 8, the control algorithm Gc(s) of the controller 510 is designed through analysis of a closed loop circuit of
Thus, when Equations 7 and 8 are used, it is possible to determine a transfer function of the control closed loop modified in one block 610 in which the ZOH and delay effects of
In a conventional system, the voltage equation on the synchronous coordinate system of Equation 8 is used for the motor modeling. In this case, when dynamic characteristics of a current command idqse* corresponding to the input of the inverter and an actual current idqse corresponding to the output of the motor are designed as in Equation 10, a relational expression shown in Equation 11 may be derived through the system shown in
That is, when the relational expression of Equation 11 is utilized through a known GT(s) and Gclosed(s) directly designed by the user, the control algorithm Ge(s) of the controller 510 may be determined in the form of Equation 12.
In this case, in order to implement the control algorithm of the controller 510 in the digital inverter 500, a transfer function in the discrete time domain is required instead of a transfer function in the continuous time domain. Therefore, in order to discretize the relational expression of Equation 11, a control algorithm Gc(z), which is capable of being finally implemented in a discretized form by applying a z transform to Gclosed(s) and GT(s), is designed as in Equation 13.
In this case, the z transform transforms a signal in the time domain represented as a real number sequence or a complex number sequence in signal processing into an expression in a complex frequency domain, and the z transform may be referred to as a transformation into a discrete time domain corresponding to the Laplace transform for a continuous time signal. The description thereof is well known to those skilled in the art to which the present disclosure pertains, and thus a detailed description thereof will be omitted herein.
Specifically, when the dynamic characteristic of the actual current with respect to the current command is designed using a low-pass filter as in Equation 14, the control algorithm Gc(z) of the controller 510 as in Equation 16 may be designed through GT(z) of Equation 15.
In this case, K used in the above equations denotes a controller variable.
In a conventional high-speed inverter system, since the sampling period is not sufficiently fast, a sampling phenomenon should be considered. Therefore, a description will be made based on the modeling of the inverter 500 and the motor 600, to which the ZOH and the delay are reflected, of
In a conventional inverter 500, a voltage equation of the motor on a stationary coordinate system is determined in the continuous time domain (S810). This is expressed as Equation 4. Thereafter, coordinate transformation is performed through Equation 5 (S820), and the voltage equation of the motor on the synchronous coordinate system may be determined in the continuous time domain (S830). This is expressed as Equation 6.
Then, the voltage equation of the motor on the synchronous coordinate system is determined as in Equation 9 in the continuous time domain in which the ZOH and the time delay are combined (S840), and a transfer function of the current control closed-loop on the synchronous coordinate system is determined as in Equation 11 in the continuous time domain (S850).
Thereafter, the transfer function of the current control closed loop on the synchronous coordinate system is discretized in the continuous time domain to determine the transfer function of the current control closed loop on the synchronous coordinate system in the discrete time domain as in Equation 12 (S860), and by using the voltage equation of the motor on the synchronous coordinate system in the continuous time domain, in which the transfer function of the current control response characteristic in the discrete time domain of Equation 14 and the discretized ZOH and time delay of Equation 15 are combined, a current control transfer function of the inverter is determined as in Equation 16 (S870) and then transmitted to the inverter (S880).
In this case, the voltage equation of Equation 6 on the synchronous coordinate system, which corresponds to the last operation of the motor modeling, is derived through the coordinate transformation of Equation 5 to the voltage equation of Equation 4 on the stationary coordinate system. In this case, in the coordinate transformation equation of Equation 5, it can be seen that the sampling period is used as a variable. That is, a result of the coordinate transformation is varied according to the sampling period.
However, it can be seen that the sampling period is not included in the voltage equation of Equation 6 on the synchronous coordinate system. This is because the voltage equation is derived from Equation 4 on the premise that the sampling period is sufficiently fast.
Therefore, according to a conventional control method, a sampling phenomenon for the coordinate transformation is not considered, and thus there is a problem of causing an error in the derivation result of the discretized GT(z) of Equation 15.
That is, the conventional system is not a problem in a general inverter control system in which the sampling period is sufficiently short, whereas in a high-speed current control system, accuracy of modeling for the system is reduced, and thus there is a problem in that convergence of the inverter controller on the command is degraded and a stable operation range is limited.
Therefore, the system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure is for improving modeling accuracy by reflecting the sampling effect on the coordinate transformation and for securing command convergence performance and stability of the inverter controller in a condition of a lower sampling index.
As shown in the drawing, the inverter system of one embodiment of the present disclosure may include a controller 3 for transmitting an on/off control signal to an inverter part 13 of an inverter 1, which drives a motor 2.
The inverter 1 may include a rectifier 11 for rectifying a three-phase AC power which is input, a smoothing part 12 for smoothing and storing a direct-current (DC) voltage rectified by the rectifier 11, and the inverter part 13 for outputting the DC voltage stored in the smoothing part 12 as an AC voltage having a predetermined voltage and a frequency according to a control signal of the controller 3. The AC voltage output from the inverter part 13 is provided to the motor 2.
The motor modeling part 6 may combine the voltage equation on the stationary coordinate system of Equation 7 with the ZOH and delay effects of Equations 1 and 2 to obtain a result for the motor modeling as in Equation 17.
Z-transform is performed to discretize Equation 17 as follows.
Thereafter, when coordinate transformation is performed on Equation 5 in a discrete domain, a voltage equation on the synchronous coordinate system, in which a ZOH and a time delay for a discrete time are combined, may be determined as in Equation 19.
Then, by utilizing the closed loop of
When Equation 20 is expressed as Gprop(z), Equation 21 is obtained, and when the dynamic characteristic of the actual current with respect to the current command is designed using a low-pass filter as in Equation 14, an algorithm of the control modeling part 5 may be derived as in Equation 22.
In this case, K denotes the controller variable and denotes the dynamic characteristic of the actual current with respect to the current command.
When Equation 22 is compared with Equation 16, it can be seen that the sampling effect, which is not considered in the coordinate transformation in Equation 16, is reflected and it can be seen that the control variable K is used as in Equation 16.
Therefore, according to the control modeling part 5 of one embodiment of the present disclosure, complexity is the same as in the related art, whereas accuracy of the system modeling is increased so that the current control performance can be improved.
As shown in the drawings, in one embodiment of the present disclosure, the control modeling part 5 may determine a voltage equation of the motor on the stationary coordinate system as in Equation 7 in the continuous time domain (S10).
Then, the control modeling part 5 may determine the voltage equation of the motor in the continuous time stationary coordinate system, in which the ZOH and the time delay are combined, as in Equation 17 (S11), discretize the voltage equation of the motor, and determine a voltage equation of the motor in the discrete time stationary coordinate system, in which the ZOH and the time delay are combined, as in Equation 18 (S12).
Thereafter, the control modeling part 5 may perform coordinate transformation using Equation 5 (S13) and determine a voltage equation of the motor in a discrete time synchronous coordinate system, in which the ZOH and the time delay are combined, as in Equation 19 (S14).
Then, when a dynamic characteristic of the actual output current for the current command is designed using a low-pass filter, the control modeling part 5 may determine a transfer function of a current control closed loop in the discrete time synchronous coordinate system as in Equation 20 from the transfer function of the discrete time current control response characteristic of Equation 14 (S15).
In addition, the control modeling part 5 may determine a transfer function of the current control as in Equation 22 from the transfer function of the current control closed loop of Equation 20 (S16) and provide the transfer function of the current control to the inverter 1.
Referring to
As described above, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure, the coordinate transformation is performed in the discrete time domain during the system modeling so that the sampling effect can be reflected in the system modeling, and the current command convergence and stability can be improved.
While the present disclosure has been described with reference to embodiments thereof, the embodiments are merely illustrative and it should be understood that various modifications and equivalent embodiments can be derived by those who skilled in the art. Accordingly, the true technical scope of the present disclosure should be determined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2019-0031341 | Mar 2019 | KR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/KR2019/010306 | 8/13/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/189862 | 9/24/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6509711 | Zaremba | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6975087 | Crabill | Dec 2005 | B1 |
8803465 | Smith | Aug 2014 | B1 |
20090196629 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20120001582 | Park | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20140145665 | Shouji | May 2014 | A1 |
20150116681 | Ueda | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150288305 | Mendoza | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104135181 | Nov 2014 | CN |
108233757 | Jun 2018 | CN |
108322119 | Jul 2018 | CN |
100866414 | Nov 2008 | KR |
20090105065 | Oct 2009 | KR |
101388398 | Apr 2014 | KR |
20170003208 | Jan 2017 | KR |
20180080730 | Jul 2018 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for related Chinese Application No. 201980094170.1; action dated Jun. 4, 2024; (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220158580 A1 | May 2022 | US |