Apparatus and method for lithographic printing utilizing a precision emulsion ink feeding mechanism

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6698353
  • Patent Number
    6,698,353
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 20, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 2, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A control system for regulating the composition of an emulsion ink made from an oil-based ink and a water-based fountain solution using a mixing and dispersing apparatus includes a liquid level sensor, means responsive to the liquid level sensor for maintaining a proper liquid level in the mixing and dispersing apparatus, and means for producing an emulsion ink with a water content value which is within a predetermined range from a desired water content value. The producing means includes a feedforward controller and a feedback controller for regulating water-based fountain solution input rate to the mixing and dispersing apparatus.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is generally related to a method and apparatus for lithographic printing using emulsion ink and, more particularly, a method and apparatus for feeding emulsion ink to a plate cylinder of a lithographic printing press.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In a conventional lithographic printing process, an inking system is used to feed ink to the image areas of the printing plate and a separate dampening system is used to dampen the non-image areas of the printing plate. The water provided for dampening is more or less uniform across the press, while the ink input is regulated according to the image coverage of each printing zone and hence varies across the press. Such conventional processes have numerous drawbacks. The print quality is highly sensitive to the quality of the dampening systems, which are complex, expensive, difficult to maintain and take up valuable space. Great skill is required of the press operators to ensure that the proper ink/water ratio (i.e., ink/water balance) is maintained across the press during printing.




A relatively long start-up time is required before the ink/water balance reaches a steady state, and print quality varies during the start-up time. The time for the press to reach a steady state after a change in the ink feed rate is inversely proportional to the image coverage of each printing zone. Press operators commonly adjust the ink feed rate before the press has reached a steady state condition and hence end up chasing after a target print density constantly throughout an entire press run. This also accounts for inconsistent print quality. When the optical print density is lower than the target value, it could be caused by either insufficient ink supply or too much water supply. It requires a skilled crew to make the correct adjustment. Failure to do so may eventually result in tremendous print waste.




Ink input requirements vary across the press, which adds complexity to the printing process control, especially for a large newspaper press which may have as many as a thousand ink keys that need to be adjusted.




The aforementioned difficulties associated with presses having separate ink supply and dampening systems have prompted the development of systems using a single fluid for both inking and dampening: emulsion ink. Emulsion inks used in lithography are made from an emulsion of an oil-based ink and a water-based fountain solution. The emulsion ink is applied to a printing plate (typically mounted on a plate cylinder) having distinct image areas and non-image areas. The image areas have an oleophilic material, such as an oleophilic polymer, disposed on the surface thereof, so that the oil-based ink will adhere thereto for subsequent transfer to a printing substrate, such as a paper web. The non-image areas have a hydrophilic material, such as an aluminum oxide, disposed on the surface thereof, so that the water-based fountain solution will adhere thereto, thereby forming a protective film over the non-image areas, to prevent ink from adhering thereto. A principal advantage of the use of emulsion inks is that emulsion inks can eliminate the need for a separate system to dampen the printing plate and hence eliminates printing problems associated with keeping the ink/water properly in balance. Also, using emulsion inks simplifies the printing process by eliminating the need for many ink keys that would otherwise be required in presses using separate dampening and inking systems, i.e., to account for variations in image density.




However, a major drawback of the use of emulsion inks is that emulsion inks are often unstable (i.e. the oil-based ink and water-based fountain solution separate into distinct liquid layers). Such instability is undesirable because it interferes with ink transfer. For example, if the emulsion ink is not stable enough, the oil-based ink and water-based fountain solution will separate prematurely, before reaching the printing plate, resulting in scumming and wash marks, as water released from the emulsion ink will interfere with ink transfer by (a) reducing the amount of emulsion ink fed to the printing plate and (b) flushing across image areas of the printing plate. However, if the emulsion ink is overly stable, it will not release a sufficient amount of water to the printing plate to keep the non-image areas of the printing plate free of ink. Accordingly, the emulsion ink is formulated to have a stability that is within a “window” between being too stable and too unstable for satisfactory litho-graphic printing. It has been found that suitable emulsion inks have a water content of at least 35% by weight.




Also, because the viscosity of lithographic inks is relatively high, about 10 to a few hundred poises, lithographic inks generally do not flow freely. As water is dispersed into a matrix of lithographic ink to produce emulsion inks, the flow properties further deteriorate, making the formation of a suitably stable emulsion ink difficult.




Accordingly, when using emulsion ink, it is often necessary to adjust the ink/water balance during operation of the printing press. With existing press configurations, the adjustment will not take effect until the emulsion ink needing adjustment is substantially used up.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagrammatic view of a printing press incorporating a precision emulsion ink feeding mechanism in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a schematic diagrammatic view of the emulsion ink feeding mechanism;





FIG. 3

is a side elevational view, partially in cross-section, of a liquid mixing and dispersing apparatus forming part of the emulsion ink feeding mechanism;





FIG. 4

is a plan view showing a rotor, an inner stator member, and an outer stator member forming part of the liquid mixing and dispersing apparatus;





FIG. 5

is a fragmentary side elevational view showing the rotor, the inner stator member, and the outer stator member, partially in cross-section taken generally along lines


5





5


of

FIG. 4

;





FIG. 6

is an elevational view, taken from below, showing the rotor;





FIG. 7

is a schematic diagrammatic view of a control system for regulating the emulsion ink composition for the precision emulsion ink feeding mechanism;





FIG. 8

is a schematic diagrammatic view of an ink distribution rail and fountain roller assembly forming part of the precision emulsion ink feeding mechanism;





FIG. 9

is a plan view, partially in cross-section, of the ink distribution rail and fountain roller of

FIG. 8

;





FIG. 10

is a cross-sectional view, taken generally along lines


10





10


of

FIG. 9

, of the ink distribution rail; and





FIG. 11

is a schematic diagrammatic view of an alternative ink distribution rail and fountain roller assembly.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




The embodiments described herein are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the scope of the invention to the precise form or forms disclosed. Instead, the following embodiments have been described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and to enable others skilled in the art to follow its teachings.




In the illustrations given, and with reference first to

FIG. 1

, there is shown a printing press generally designated


10


for printing an image on a paper web


12


. The press


10


has a printing unit


14


for printing ink on the web


12


. Although not shown, the press


10


may include one or more additional printing units that may each be used, for example, for printing a different color of ink on the web


12


.




The printing unit


14


has a plate cylinder


16


associated with a blanket cylinder


18


. During printing by the press


10


, an image of the ink is transferred from the plate cylinder


16


to the blanket cylinder


18


to print the image on one surface of the web


12


. An emulsion ink, made up of an oil-based ink and a water-based fountain solution, is fed to the plate cylinder


16


from a digitally-controlled gear pump ink injector unit


20


through a plurality of distribution rollers


22


, including a fountain roller


23


, an auxiliary vibrator drum


27


, a vibrator/scraper drum


24


, and a pair of form rollers


25




a


and


25




b


. A smoothing blade


21


is mounted to the gear pump injector unit


20


and contacts the surface of the fountain roller


23


in order to evenly spread the emulsion ink onto the fountain roller


23


. The surface of the fountain roller


23


is covered with a brush surface made from a material available commercially as Part No. 2A3 from Kanebo USA Inc., 693 5th Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10022. This material is similar to the “loop” portion of so-called “hook and loop” fasteners, such as VELCRO®. The vibrator/scraper drum


24


has a wear-resistant, oleophilic/hydrophobic surface that collects excess emulsion ink that is in turn scraped off of the vibrator/scraper drum


24


by a doctor blade


26


and collected for re-use by an auger and scraper assembly


28


, forming part of an ink feed and recirculation system


29


, shown schematically in FIG.


2


. The auxiliary vibrator drum


27


and the vibrator/scraper drum


24


oscillate in an axial direction (i.e., in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the paper in

FIG. 1

) to help ensure that a uniform emulsion ink film is supplied to the plate cylinder


16


and to prevent the formation of ridges on the emulsion ink film.




The fountain roller


23


rotates at a maximum speed of about 60 revolutions per minute, and proportionally slower as press speed is slowed. The rotation of the fountain roller


23


is thus quite slow in comparison to the rotation of the auxiliary vibrator drum


27


, which typically rotates at a speed of about 1,000 revolutions per minute when the press


10


is operating.




The inking rollers (i.e. the fountain roller


23


, the form rollers


25




a


,


25




b


, and those rollers therebetween) are driven by a separate motor so that the inking rollers may be driven while the plate cylinder


16


and the blanket cylinder


18


are stationary. Therefore, the inking rollers may be driven at press startup until an acceptable emulsion ink has been formed by the ink feed and recirculation system


29


, thereby minimizing print waste during press startup.




With reference to

FIG. 2

, the collected excess ink is transported by the auger and scraper assembly


28


to a conduit


30


which feeds a mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


. Fresh ink is fed to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


from an ink supply reservoir


34


through a conduit


36


. The flow of fresh ink through the conduit


36


is controlled by a new ink valve


38


that is responsive to a liquid level sensor


40


that senses the level of liquid in the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


. If the liquid level sensor


40


determines an overflow level of liquid, emulsion ink via conduit


62


is diverted to a conduit


61


and into an auxiliary reservoir


65


. Liquid from the auxiliary reservoir


65


may be used again by feeding it back to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


via a conduit


67


. Liquid discharge into or out of the auxiliary reservoir


65


is controlled via solenoid valves


69




a


,


69




b


, and


69




c


and by air depressurizing (discharge into) or air pressurizing (discharge out of) the auxiliary reservoir


65


. The solenoid valve


69


c can connect the auxiliary reservoir


65


to either a shop air system


71


, providing air pressure of from about 40 psi (about 276 kPa) to about 70 psi (about 483 kPa), for pressurizing the auxiliary reservoir


65


, or an ambient air source


73


, providing air at an ambient pressure of about 14.7 psi (about 101 kPa), for depressurizing the auxiliary reservoir


65


. If desired, a vacuum source may be substituted for the ambient air source


73


, in order to provide air at an even lower pressure.




Fresh fountain solution (or clean water, as the case may be) is fed to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


from a fountain solution supply reservoir


44


through a conduit


46


. The flow of fresh fountain solution through the conduit


46


is controlled by a valve


48


that is responsive to a water content sensor


50


that senses the percentage of water flowing out of the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


in an outlet conduit


52


. The emulsion ink is fed to an ink distribution rail


60


via a conduit


59


. The ink distribution rail


60


in turn feeds the digitally-controlled gear pump ink injector unit


20


. Unused emulsion ink is continuously recirculated to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


via the return conduit


62


. This continuous recirculation of unused emulsion ink via the return conduit


62


is in addition to the ink scraped off of the vibrator/scraper drum


24


and returned to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


via the conduit


30


. The continuous recirculation of emulsion ink ensures that the emulsion ink remains stable and makes it possible to reformulate the emulsion ink, if necessary (i.e. if the water content thereof is too low or too high), without having to wait for the exhaustion of all of the emulsion ink that is in need of reformulation. This dramatically reduces the amount of print waste due to poorly formulated emulsion ink.




A restriction valve


51


ensures that the pressure in the conduit


62


is between about 10 psi (about 69 kPa) and about 20 psi (about 138 kPa). The restriction valve


51


ensures that there is adequate pressure in the ink distribution rail


60


and adequate pressure for filling the auxiliary reservoir


65


, when necessary.




With reference to

FIGS. 3 and 5

, the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


includes a vessel


63


comprising a first circular horizontal wall


64


, and a cylindrically-shaped upper vertical wall


66


having a height of about 21.0 cm and an inner diameter of about 17.8 cm, that together define a cylindrically-shaped upper chamber


68


.




The first horizontal wall


64


has a circular opening


70


therein having a diameter of about 6.4 cm. The vessel


63


also includes a cylindrically-shaped lower vertical wall


72


having an inner diameter of about 13.8 cm, that is disposed directly below the first horizontal wall


64


. The first horizontal wall


64


, the cylindrically-shaped lower vertical wall


72


, and a second circular horizontal wall


74


, together define a cylindrically-shaped lower chamber


76


. The second circular horizontal wall


74


has a substantially square-shaped opening


78


therein, having dimensions of about 8.0 by 8.0 cm, that leads to a gear pump


80


, driven by a motor


81


(FIG.


2


), that pumps emulsion ink out of the lower chamber


76


.




A cup-shaped outer stator


82


is fixedly attached to the first horizontal wall


64


and is perforated by twenty four vertical slots


84


evenly distributed about an outer stator cylindrical wall


86


, having a wall thickness of about 4.8 mm. A cup-shaped inner stator


88


is fixedly attached to the outer stator


82


and is perforated by sixteen vertical slots


90


evenly distributed about an inner stator cylindrical wall


92


, having a wall thickness of about 4.0 mm. Each of the slots


84


and


90


has a height of about 15.9 mm and a width of about 3.4 mm.




A high-speed electric motor


94


is disposed above the upper chamber


68


and drives a motor shaft


96


in a clockwise direction as viewed from above, as indicated by an arrow


98


. A propeller


100


is mounted to the motor shaft


96


for rotation therewith and comprises three propeller blades


102


equally angularly spaced apart from one another by 120 degrees and each pitched by an angle of about 20 degrees with respect to the horizontal such that a leading edge


104


of each propeller blade


102


is above a respective trailing edge


106


of each propeller blade


102


. The propeller


100


has a diameter of about 12.7 cm and is mounted to the motor shaft


96


in the upper chamber


68


at a location that is preferably between one half to one full propeller diameter above the first horizontal wall


64


.




A rotor


108


(best seen in

FIGS. 4 and 6

) is mounted to the lower end of the motor shaft


96


for rotation therewith. The rotor


108


includes three horizontal blades


110


that are equally angularly spaced apart from one another by 120 degrees. Each blade


110


includes a downwardly extending inner tooth


112


and a downwardly extending outer tooth


114


. Each inner tooth


112


is disposed radially inwardly of the inner stator wall


92


and each outer tooth


114


is disposed between the inner stator wall


92


and the outer stator wall


86


. A relatively close clearance of about 0.4 mm is provided between the teeth


112


,


114


and the stator walls


86


,


92


.




In operation, the motor


94


is rotated at a speed of between about 500 and about 4,000 revolutions per minute, and the motor shaft


96


, the rotor


108


, and the propeller


100


rotate at the same speed as the motor


94


. Due to the pitch of the propeller blades


102


, the rotation of the propeller


100


causes the ink and fountain solution in the upper chamber


68


to mix together and to flow downwardly toward the rotor


108


. The rotation of the rotor


108


shears the ink and fountain solution between the rotor teeth


112


,


114


and the inner and outer stator walls


92


and


86


. This shearing causes the formation of a fine emulsion ink that is dispersed through the slots


90


and


84


in the inner and outer stator walls


92


and


86


into the lower chamber


76


. The emulsion ink is then pumped by the gear pump


80


to the conduit


57


(FIG.


2


).




The propeller


100


pre-mixes the ink and fountain solution together and ensures that the fountain solution added to the upper chamber


68


does not simply sit on top of the ink surface and fail to mix with the ink matrix to form an emulsion ink having the desired water content. The propeller


100


also prevents a cavity from forming above the rotor


108


, that would inhibit ink and fountain solution from flowing into the lower chamber


76


.




With reference to

FIG. 7

, an electronic control system


116


, for regulating the emulsion ink composition for the precision emulsion ink feeding mechanism, comprises a new ink controller


118


and a water content controller


120


.




The control system


116


ensures that the liquid level in the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


is maintained at an acceptable level. The control system


116


comprises the liquid level sensor


40


that includes an overflow sensor


122


and a minimum liquid level sensor


124


, both of which are shown schematically in FIG.


2


. New ink and/or fountain solution is added to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


from the ink supply reservoir


34


, the fountain solution supply reservoir


44


and/or the auxiliary reservoir


65


if the liquid level in the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


is too low, and emulsion ink is discharged from the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


to the auxiliary reservoir


65


if the liquid level in the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


is too high. Emulsion ink may also be discharged from the mixing and dispensing apparatus


56


to the auxiliary reservoir


65


if the water content of the emulsion ink is out of tolerance, so that either fresh ink or fountain solution can be added to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


from the ink supply reservoir


34


or the fountain solution supply reservoir


44


, respectively, to quickly reformulate the emulsion ink without overflowing the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


.




The water content controller


120


uses both feedback and feedforward control strategies. The feedback control strategy is based on the difference between the desired water content value and the actual water content value, as sensed by the water content sensor


50


, generating an error signal, E, which is input into a PID (proportional, integration, differentiation) controller


121


.




The feedforward control strategy includes an input K


n


, based on the status of the new ink valve


38


, an input K


s


, based on the press speed, and a water offset input that accounts for evaporation. The input K


n


accounts for the fact that, when the new ink valve


38


is open, fresh ink is being fed to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


. The input K


s


accounts for the fact that, as press speed goes up, more scraped ink will be fed to the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


. The feedforward control strategy therefore anticipates the expected requirements for fountain solution and minimizes the error, E, that needs to be resolved by the PID controller


121


. Accordingly, response time for necessary adjustments to the emulsion ink is minimized.




The operation of the water content controller


120


is also regulated by the new ink controller


118


. For example, when the ink level is low, fresh ink will be pumped into the mixing and dispersing apparatus


56


. This action will lower the water content of the emulsion ink in the ink feed and recirculation system


29


. Hence, more water has to be pumped into the ink feed and recirculation system


29


to maintain a constant level of water content.




With reference to

FIGS. 8-10

, the digitally-controlled gear pump ink injector unit


20


comprises a plurality of positive displacement gear pumps


126


mounted within the ink distribution rail


60


. Each of the positive displacement gear pumps


126


may be any suitable positive displacement pump, such as a diaphragm pump, a reciprocating piston pump, a moving vane pump, or a lobe pump. The positive displacement gear pumps


126


are driven by a single electric motor


128


by means of a single drive shaft


130


. The positive displacement gear pumps


126


can be precisely controlled electronically, thereby providing optimal coverage of the fountain roller


23


with emulsion ink and providing the capability, for example, to proportionally control the flow rate through the positive displacement gear pumps


126


based on press speed. This makes it unnecessary to rely on a metering roll to achieve optimal coverage of the plate cylinder


16


, and makes the printing press


10


reach a steady state fairly quickly.




In an alternative embodiment, shown schematically in

FIG. 11

, a proportionally-controlled positive displacement pump ink injector unit


220


comprises a plurality of positive displacement pumps


226


mounted within the ink distribution rail


60


. Each of the positive displacement pumps


226


is independently driven by a separate digitally-controlled electric motor


228


by means of a separate drive shaft


230


, in order to allow a marginal differentiation of the ink feed rate of the positive displacement pumps


226


, for example, to compensate for the effects of what are commonly known as starvation and ghosting.




Numerous modifications and alternative embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the foregoing description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the best mode of carrying out the invention. The details of the structure may be varied substantially without departing from the spirit of the invention, and the exclusive use of all modifications which come within the scope of the appended claims is reserved.



Claims
  • 1. A control system for regulating the composition of an emulsion ink made from an oil-based ink and a water-based fountain solution using a mixing and dispersing apparatus, for a lithographic printing press, the control system comprising:a liquid level sensor adapted to provide an actual level of the emulsion ink in the mixing and dispersing apparatus; a first regulator adapted to regulate a water-based fountain solution content of the emulsion ink based at least on a desired water-based fountain solution content, an actual water-based fountain solution content of the emulsion ink, and the actual level of the emulsion ink; and a second regulator operatively coupled to the first regulator and adapted to regulate an oil-based ink content of the emulsion ink based at least on the desired water-based fountain solution content, the actual water-based fountain solution content, and the actual level of the emulsion ink.
  • 2. The control system of claim 1, further comprising means for adding oil-based ink and water-based fountain solution into the mixing and dispersing apparatus if the level of the emulsion ink in the mixing and dispersing apparatus is too low.
  • 3. The control system of claim 1, further comprising means for discharging the emulsion ink from the mixing and dispersing apparatus if the level of the emulsion ink in the mixing and dispersing apparatus is too high.
  • 4. The control system of claim 1, further comprising means for discharging the emulsion ink from the mixing and dispersing apparatus if the content of the water-based fountain solution of the emulsion ink is outside of the predetermined range from the desired content of the water-based fountain solution.
  • 5. The control system of claim 1, further comprising a water content sensor for measuring the content of the water-based fountain solution of the emulsion ink produced by the mixing and dispersing apparatus, the water content sensor having an output;wherein the first regulator generates an error signal from a difference between the desired content of the water-based fountain solution of the emulsion ink and the output of the water content sensor.
  • 6. The control system of claim 5, wherein the first regulator comprises at least a proportional control element using the error signal as its input.
  • 7. The control system of claim 5, wherein the first regulator comprises a proportional, integral and differential control element using the error signal as its input.
  • 8. The control system of claim 1, wherein the second regulator comprises means for anticipating expected water-based fountain solution requirements based on at least one sensed condition.
  • 9. The control system of claim 8, wherein the sensed conditions include an input based upon a flow rate of fresh oil-based ink into the mixing and dispersing apparatus.
  • 10. The control system of claim 8, wherein the sensed conditions include a water offset input to account for evaporation.
  • 11. The control system of claim 8, wherein the sensed conditions include a press speed input.
  • 12. The control system of claim 11, wherein the second regulator provides an additional amount of water-based fountain solution proportional to the press speed to the mixing and dispersing apparatus.
  • 13. A lithographic printing press control system for regulating the composition of an emulsion ink made from an oil-based ink and a water-based fountain solution using a mixing and dispersing apparatus, the mixing and dispersing apparatus having an oil-based ink input and a water-based fountain solution input, the control system comprising:a liquid level sensor for measuring emulsion ink level inside the mixing and dispersing apparatus, the liquid level sensor having an output; means responsive to the output of the liquid level sensor for maintaining a proper emulsion ink level in the mixing and dispersing apparatus; a water sensor for measuring water content of the emulsion ink produced by the mixing and dispersing apparatus, the water sensor having an output; means for regulating the water-based fountain solution input rate based on the output of the liquid level sensor, a desired water content of the emulsion ink, at least one of the variables selected from the group consisting of press speed, oil-based ink input rate and water evaporation rate, and the output of the water sensor; and means for regulating the oil-based ink input rate based on the output of the liquid level sensor, the desired water content of the emulsion ink, and the output of the water sensor.
  • 14. The control system of claim 1, wherein the first regulator is a feedback regulator.
  • 15. The control system of claim 1, wherein the second regulator is a feedforward regulator.
  • 16. A method of regulating a composition of an emulsion ink made from an oil-based ink and a water-based fountain solution using a mixing and dispersing apparatus, for a lithographic printing press, the method comprising:measuring an actual emulsion ink level in the mixing and dispersing apparatus; determining an amount of water required to maintain the emulsion ink level in a desired emulsion ink level range based at least on a desired water content in the emulsion ink, an actual water content in the emulsion ink, and the actual emulsion ink level; determining the amount of ink required to provide the composition of the emulsion ink based at least on the desired water content, the actual water content in the emulsion ink, and at least the actual emulsion ink level; and supplying the amount of the water required and the amount of the ink required to the mixing and dispersing apparatus to provide a desired level of emulsion ink in the mixing and dispersing apparatus.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein determining an amount of water required to maintain the emulsion ink level in a desired emulsion ink level range comprises:measuring a water content error based on a difference between the desired water content in the emulsion ink and the actual water content in the emulsion ink, wherein the actual water content is measured with a water senor; and determining an amount of water required to maintain the emulsion ink level in a desired emulsion ink level range based on the water content error and at least one of the variables selected from the group consisting of press speed, ink input rate and water evaporation rate.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein determining the amount of ink required to provide the composition of the emulsion ink is based on difference between the desired water content in the emulsion ink and the actual water content in the emulsion ink, wherein the actual water content is measured with a water senor.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation filed U.S. application Ser. No. 08/923, 010, filed Sep. 3, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,318,259.

US Referenced Citations (34)
Number Name Date Kind
2154544 Taylor Apr 1939 A
2177656 Kaddeland Oct 1939 A
2366375 Worthington Jan 1945 A
3045592 Shearer et al. Jul 1962 A
3137137 Källe Jun 1964 A
3958509 Murray et al. May 1976 A
4064801 Switall Dec 1977 A
4085672 Grosart Apr 1978 A
4281597 Dressler Aug 1981 A
4329923 Iida May 1982 A
4388864 Warner Jun 1983 A
4407159 Wytaniec Oct 1983 A
4461211 Wesselmann et al. Jul 1984 A
4523854 Beckley Jun 1985 A
4527479 Dahlgren et al. Jul 1985 A
4559493 Goldberg et al. Dec 1985 A
4595933 Mayer Jun 1986 A
4658207 Scribano et al. Apr 1987 A
4690055 Fadner et al. Sep 1987 A
4787313 Osborn et al. Nov 1988 A
4864925 Van Kanegan et al. Sep 1989 A
5027706 Niemiro et al. Jul 1991 A
5044274 Gaunt Sep 1991 A
5088402 Hycner et al. Feb 1992 A
5105739 Osawa et al. Apr 1992 A
5224421 Doherty Jul 1993 A
5280750 Yoshida et al. Jan 1994 A
5303649 Reder et al. Apr 1994 A
5315930 Niemiro May 1994 A
5372067 Doyle Dec 1994 A
5438921 Hasegawa Aug 1995 A
5694974 Niemiro et al. Dec 1997 A
5735205 Nordgren Apr 1998 A
5927200 Chou et al. Jul 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0 355 590 Feb 1990 EP
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/923010 Sep 1997 US
Child 09/989310 US