1. Field of the Invention
The present invention pertains to the art of making golf balls, and, more particularly, to a new die configuration for use in reaction injection molding of golf ball layers and covers.
2. Description of the Related Art
Golf balls are typically made by molding a core of elastomeric or polymeric material into a spheroid shape. A cover is then molded around the core. Sometimes, before the cover is molded about the core, an intermediate layer is molded about the core and the cover is then molded around the intermediate layer. The molding processes used for the cover and the intermediate layer are similar and usually involve either compression molding or injection molding.
In compression molding, the golf ball core is inserted into a central area of a two piece die and pre-sized sections of cover material are placed in each half of the die, which then clamps shut. The application of heat and pressure molds the cover material about the core.
Blends of polymeric materials have been used for modem golf ball covers because certain grades and combinations have offered certain levels of hardness, to resist damage when the ball is hit with a club, and elasticity, to allow responsiveness to the hit. Some of these materials facilitate processing by compression molding, yet disadvantages have arisen. These disadvantages include the presence of seams in the cover, which occur where the pre-sized sections of cover material were joined, and high process cycle times which are required to heat the cover material and complete the molding process.
Injection molding of golf ball covers arose as a processing technique to overcome some of the disadvantages of compression molding. The process involves inserting a golf ball core into a die, closing the die and forcing a heated, viscous polymeric material into the die. The material is then cooled and the golf ball is removed from the die. Injection molding is well-suited for thermoplastic materials, but has limited application to some thermosetting polymers. However, certain types of these thermosetting polymers often exhibit the hardness and elasticity desired for a golf ball cover. Some of the most promising thermosetting materials are reactive, requiring two or more components to be mixed and rapidly transferred into a die before a polymerization reaction is complete. As a result, traditional injection molding techniques do not provide proper processing when applied to these materials.
Reaction injection molding is a processing technique used specifically for certain reactive thermosetting plastics. As mentioned above, by “reactive” it is meant that the polymer is formed from two or more components which react. Generally, the components, prior to reacting, exhibit relatively low viscosities. The low viscosities of the components allow the use of lower temperatures and pressures than those utilized in traditional injection molding. In reaction injection molding, the two or more components are combined and react to produce the final polymerized material. Mixing of these separate components is critical, a distinct difference from traditional injection molding.
The process of reaction injection molding a golf ball cover involves placing a golf ball core into a die, closing the die, injecting the reactive components into a mixing chamber where they combine, and transferring the combined material into the die. The mixing begins the polymerization reaction which is typically completed upon cooling of the cover material.
The present invention provides a new mold or die configuration and a new method of processing for reaction injection molding a golf ball cover or inner layer which promotes increased mixing of constituent materials, resulting in enhanced properties and the ability to explore the use of materials new to the golf ball art.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus for making a golf ball is provided. The apparatus is a mold for making a golf ball which includes a body and a cavity defined within the body for retaining a golf ball core. The mold provides a molding cavity, at least one material flow inlet, and at least one material flow channel providing fluid communication between the molding cavity and the material flow inlet. The mold additionally provides at least a portion of the material flow channel having a plurality of bends and at least one branching intersection that promotes turbulence in a liquid molding material flowing therethrough.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a method of making a golf ball is provided. The method includes providing a molding assembly including a mold defining a molding cavity adapted to receive a golf ball core and a material flow channel providing fluid communication between the molding cavity and a source of flowable molding material. The material flow channel has at least one turbulence-promoting fan gate. The method further includes obtaining a golf ball core, positioning the core within the molding cavity, and introducing an effective amount of the flowable molding material through the material flow channel and into the molding cavity thereby causing the flowable molding material to pass through the turbulence-promoting fan gate and forming a layer of the molding material about the core.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a golf ball is provided. The golf ball includes a core and at least one layer formed from a reaction injected molded material surrounding the core. The layer preferably has a thickness of about 0.015 inch to 0.050 inch.
One advantage of the present invention is that the constituent materials are mixed thoroughly, thereby providing a more consistent intermediate and/or cover layer, resulting in better golf ball performance characteristics.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the use of new, lower viscosity materials may be explored, resulting in enhanced golf ball properties and performance.
Yet another advantage of the present invention is that increased mixing of lower viscosity materials allows the intermediate layer or cover to be thinner, resulting in increased ball performance.
Still another advantage of the present invention is that a unique venting configuration of the mold reduces the porosity of the material being processed, creating a ball cover or other layer that is substantially free from voids.
Having briefly described the present invention, the above and further objects, features and advantages thereof will be recognized by those skilled in the pertinent art from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Turning now to the drawings, with reference to
Turning now to
Each upper and lower half 22A and 22B of the preferred embodiment molding assembly 20 defines an adapter portion 26A and 26B to enable the body 20 to connect to other process equipment as mentioned above and leads to a material inlet channel 28A and 28B as illustrated in
With continuing reference to
With continuing reference to
Turning now to
At each first planar wall 40A and 40B, the material can no longer continue to flow within the plane of the closed mold, i.e., the halves 22A and 22B being aligned with one another. To aid the present description it will be understood that in closing the mold, the upper half 22A is oriented downward (referring to
Specifically, at the first planar wall 40A the material flows from a point al in one half 22A to a corresponding point al in the other half 22B. Point al in half 22B lies at the commencement of a first convergent portion 42B. Likewise, at the first planar wall 40B the material flows from a point .beta.1 in one half 22B to a corresponding point .beta.1 in the other half 22A. The point .beta.1 in half 22A lies at the commencement of a first convergent portion 42A. The first convergent portion 42A and 42B brings the material to a first common area 44A and 44B. In the shown embodiment, each first convergent portion is parallel to each first diverging branching intersection to promote a smooth material transfer. For example, the portion 42A is parallel to the portion 38A, and the portion 42B is parallel to the portion 38B.
With continuing reference to
In the shown embodiment, each second convergent portion 50A and 50B, is parallel to each second diverging branching intersection 46A and 46B. For example, the portion 50A is parallel to the portion 46A and the portion 50B is parallel to the portion 46B. The second convergent portion 50A and 50B forces the material into a second common area 52A and 52B to once again rejoin the separated material. As with the first common area 44A and 44B, the second common area 52A and 52B has a full circular cross section.
After the common area 52A and 52B, a third branching intersection 54A and 54B again diverges, separating the material and conveying it in different directions. Upon reaching each respective third planar wall, i.e., the planar wall 56A in the portion 54A and the planar wall 56B in the portion 54B, the material is forced to again flow in a transverse, z-direction from the planar x-y direction. From a point .alpha.3 at the third planar wall 56A in one half 22A, the material flows to a corresponding point .alpha.3 in the other half 22B, which lies in a third convergent portion 58B. Correspondingly, from a point .beta.3 at third planar wall 56B in one half 22B, the material flows to a corresponding point .beta.3 in the other half 22A, which is in a third convergent portion 58A.
The turbulence-promoting fan gate structure 30A and 30B ends with a third convergent portion 58A and 58B returning the separated material to the connecting flow channel 32A and 32B. The connecting channel 32A and 32B is a common, uniform circular channel having a curvature of 360 degrees. Once the material enters the connecting channel portion 32A and 32B, typical straight or curved smooth linear flow recommences.
By separating-and recombining materials repeatedly as they flow, the present invention provides for increased mixing of constituent materials. Through the incorporation of split channels and transverse flow, mixing is encouraged and controlled while the flow remains uniform, reducing back flow or hanging-up of material, thereby reducing the degradation often involved in non-linear flow. Particular note is made of the angles of divergence and convergence of the fan gate portions 38A and 38B, 42A and 42B, 46A and 46B, 50A and 50B, 54A and 54B and 58A and 58B, as each extends at the angle of about 30 degrees to 60 degrees from the centerline of the linear inlet flow channel 28A, 28B. This range of angles allows for rapid separation and re-convergence while minimizing back flow. In addition, each divergent branching portion and converging portion 38A and 38B, 42A and 42B, 46A and 46B, 50A and 50B, 54A and 54B and 58A and 58B extends from the centerline of the linear inlet flow channel 28A, 28B for a distance of one to three times the diameter of the channel 28A, 28B before reaching its respective planar wall 40A and 40B, 48A and 48B and 56A and 56B. Further note is made of the common areas 44A and 44B and 52A and 52B. These areas are directly centered about a same linear centerline which extends from the inlet flow channel portion 28A, 28B to the commencement of the connecting flow channel portion 32A, 32B. As a result, the common areas 44A and 44B and 52A and 52B are aligned linearly with the channel portions 28A, 28B and 32A, 32B, providing for more consistent, uniform flow. While several divergent, convergent, and common portions are illustrated, it is anticipated that as few as one divergent and convergent portion or as many as ten to twenty divergent and convergent portions may be used, depending upon the application and materials involved.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the fan gate includes a plurality of bends or arcuate portions that cause liquid flowing through the fan gate to not only be directed in the same plane in which the flow channel lies, but also in a second plane that is perpendicular to the first plane. It is most preferable to utilize a fan gate with bends such that liquid flowing the rethrough travels in a plane that is perpendicular to both the previously noted first and second planes. This configuration results in relatively thorough and efficient mixing due to the rapid and changing course of direction of liquid flowing therethrough.
The configuration of the mold channels may take various forms. One such variation is shown in
In the above-referenced figures, the channels 30A and 30B are depicted as each comprising a plurality of angled bends or turns. Turning now to
As shown in
With reference to
The pin 36 may further comprise a tip component 68 that is disposed at the end 62 of pin 36. Most preferably, the tip component 68 is positioned at the entrance of the channel 60 at the end of 62. The tip component 68 is structured to allow the passage of gases but prevent the molding materials from entering the channel 60. The tip component 68 may be of a porous material or a solid material including one or more passages large enough to allow the transfer of gas while small enough to prevent passage of RIM materials. The component 68 may also be an integral part of pin 36, or it may be a separate unit which is joined to pin 36 by a manner known in the art, such as press fitting.
Gases, including air and moisture, are often present in a RIM process and create undesirable voids in the molded cover 14. Venting of central cavity 24A, 24B reduces voids by removing these gases. Through the use of vented pins 36 a cover 14 is provided that is significantly more free from voids or other imperfections than a cover produced by a non-vented RIM process.
A preferred method of making a golf ball in accordance with the present invention is illustrated in
In accordance with conventional molding techniques, the preferred embodiment molding processes described herein may utilize one or more mold release agents to facilitate removal of the molded layer or component from the mold.
A golf ball manufactured according the preferred method described herein exhibits unique characteristics. Golf ball covers made through compression molding and traditional injection molding include balata, ionomer resins, polyesters resins and polyurethanes. The selection of polyurethanes which can be processed by these methods is limited. Polyurethanes are often a desirable material for golf ball covers because balls made with these covers are more resistant to scuffing and resistant to deformation than balls made with covers of other materials. The current invention allows processing of a wide array of grades of polyurethane through RIM which was not previously possible or commercially practical utilizing either compression molding or traditional injection molding. For example, utilizing the present invention method and BAYER® MP-10000 polyurethane resin, a golf ball with the properties described below has been provided. It is anticipated that other urethane resins such as BAYER® MP-7500, BAYER® MP-5000, BAYER® aliphatic or light stable resins, and UNIROYAL® aliphatic and aromatic resins may be used.
Some of the unique characteristics exhibited by a golf ball according to the present invention include a thinner cover without the accompanying disadvantages otherwise associated with relatively thin covers such as weakened regions at which inconsistent compositional differences exist. A traditional golf ball cover typically has a thickness in the range of about 0.060 inch to 0.080 inch. A golf ball of the present invention may utilize a cover having a thickness of about 0.015 inch 0.050 inch. This reduced cover thickness is often a desirable characteristic. It is contemplated that thinner layer thicknesses are possible using the present invention.
Because of the reduced pressure involved in RIM as compared to traditional injection molding, a cover or any other layer of the present invention golf ball is more dependably concentric and uniform with the core of the ball, thereby improving ball performance. That is, a more uniform and reproducible geometry is attainable by employing the present invention.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the examples, and various changes and modifications may be made in the invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.
A golf ball of the present invention including a cover of BAYER® MP-10000 polyurethane resin RIM molded at a thickness of 0.035 inch (“RIM A”) was compared to a ball with a cover also molded at a thickness of 0.035 inch but of conventional ionomer resin (“Ionomer”). Also used for comparison were standard balls of the prior art, a STRATA TOUR® PROFESSIONAL 90™ ball (“STRATA®”) and a TITLEIST® TOUR PRESTIGE 90™ ball (“TOUR PRESTIGE”). Data based on the comparison is displayed in Table 1. The data for this Example and Example 2 represents the average data for one dozen balls produced according to the prescribed manner. The properties were measured according to the following parameters:
PGA Compression (“PGA Com.”) generally is a measurement of the deformation of a golf ball from thousandths of an inch determined by a force applied to a spring. The equipment for the measurement is manufactured by Atti Engineering, Union City, N.J. Details of measuring PGA compression are set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,779,561, herein incorporated by reference.
Coefficient of restitution (“COR”) generally is measured by firing the resulting golf ball from an air cannon at a velocity of 125 feet per second against a steel plate which is positioned 12 feet from the muzzle of the cannon. The rebound velocity is then measured. The rebound velocity is divided by the forward velocity to give the coefficient of restitution.
Rebound (“Rbd.”) generally is measured by dropping a ball from a fixed height of 100 inches and measuring the maximum height reached in inches after the first impact with the ground.
Cover Hardness (“Cover Hs”) is measured on a Shore C scale using DUROTRONIC 2000™ system type C, 10 measurements per ball. Cover hardness is measured by taking the measurement on a land area on the curved surface of the cover layer.
Cut is a ranking from 1 to 6 of the resistance to the ball cover of a cut, 1 being the best. Cut is measured by dropping a 5.9 lb weight from a height of 41 inches onto a golf ball in a guillotine fashion, i.e., using a tester set up with a guillotine design. The ball is loosely held in a spherical cavity and the guillotine face strikes the approximate middle of the ball surface. The face of the guillotine is approximately 0.125 inch wide by 1.52 inches long and all edges are radiused in a bullnose fashion. The ball is struck in three different locations and is then assigned a ranking based on the degree of damage.
Scuff is also a ranking from 1 to 6, 1 being the best, using a MALTBY® Sand Wedge to determine the susceptibility of the ball cover to scuffing from the club. A sharp-grooved MALTBY® Sand Wedge with 56 degrees of loft is mounted on the arm of a mechanical swing machine. The sand wedge is swung at 60 miles per hour and hits the ball into a capture net. The ball is hit three times, each time in a different location, and then assigned a ranking based on the degree of damage. The club face of the MALTBY® Sand Wedge has a groove width of 0.025 inch, cut with a mill cutter with no sandblasting or post finishing. Each groove is 0.016 inch deep and the space from one groove edge to the nearest adjacent groove edge is 0.105 inch.
Nine iron spin (“9 iron spin”), five iron spin (“5 iron spin”) and driver spin are measured by striking the resulting golf balls with a respective club (a nine iron for nine iron spin, a five iron for five iron spin and a driver for driver spin) wherein the club-head speed is about 105 feet per second. The ball is launched at an initial velocity of about 110-115 feet per second at the angle specified in the column designated “9 iron L.A.” for the nine iron spin test, the angle specified in the column designated “5 iron L.A.” for the five iron spin test and the angle specified in the column designation “driver L.A.” for the driver spin test. The spin rate is measured by observing the rotation of the ball in flight using stop action Strobe photography.
As evident in the above data, the golf ball of the present invention exhibits a higher PGA compression than any of the other tested balls, indicating a better response from a club hit. The coefficient of restitution, rebound and spin characteristics of the new ball are better than the STRATA® and TOUR PRESTIGE™ balls. Although the ionomer ball exhibits some properties which are comparable to the ball of the present invention, the cut resistance of the new ball is significantly better. A golf ball of the present invention exhibits a cut resistance of less than 1.5. As a result, the improved properties of the ball of the present invention are evident.
A golf ball of the present invention including a cover of BAYER® MP-10000 polyurethane resin RIM molded at a thickness of 0.050 inches (“RIM B”) was compared to a ball with a cover molded at a thickness of 0.035 inches but of ionomer resin (“Ionomer”). Also used for comparison are standard balls of the prior art, a STRATA TOUR® PROFESSIONAL 90™ ball (“STRATA®”) and a TITLEIST® TOUR PRESTIGE 90™ ball (“TOUR PRESTIGE™”) Data based on the comparison is displayed in Table 2.
This data illustrates the superior compression and cut resistance of a ball of the present invention, while maintaining levels of other desired properties that are similar to those exhibited by balls of the prior art. As shown in Table 2, a golf ball of the present invention exhibits a cut resistance of less than 1.5.
From the foregoing it is believed that those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize the meritorious advancement of this invention and will readily understand that while the present invention has been described in association with a preferred embodiment thereof, and other embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings, numerous changes, modifications and substitutions of equivalents may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention which is intended to be unlimited by the foregoing except as may appear in the following appended claims. Therefore, the embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined in the following appended claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/390,296, filed on Mar. 17, 2003, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/812,878, filed on Mar. 20, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,533,566, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/690,487, filed on Oct. 17, 2000, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/040,798, filed on Mar. 18, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,855,073.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10390296 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 11163532 | Oct 2005 | US |
Parent | 09812878 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10390296 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09690487 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 09812878 | Mar 2001 | US |
Parent | 09040798 | Mar 1998 | US |
Child | 09690487 | Oct 2000 | US |