Apparatus and method for measuring a fluid flow parameter within an internal passage of an elongated body

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7752918
  • Patent Number
    7,752,918
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 8, 2007
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 13, 2010
    15 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for measuring at least one parameter of a fluid flowing through an internal passage of an elongated body is provided. The internal passage is disposed between a first wall and a second wall, and the first wall and the second wall each include an interior surface and an exterior surface. The method includes the steps of providing an array of at least two ultrasonic sensor units, operating the sensor units to transmit ultrasonic signals at one or more frequencies substantially coincident with at least one frequency at which the transmitted ultrasonic signals resonate within the first wall, receiving the ultrasonic signals with the sensor units, and processing the received ultrasonic signals to measure the at least one parameter of fluid flow within the internal passage.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention pertains to the field of processing ultrasonic signals, and more particularly to apparatus and methods for using ultrasonic signals to measure one or more parameters of a fluid flowing within an internal passage of an elongated body.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Flow meters utilizing ultrasonic transducers can be used to sense fluid flow properties such as velocity, volumetric flow rate, etc. Cross correlation ultrasonic flow meters (CCUF), for example, can measure the time required for ultrasonic beams to transit across a flow path at two, axially displaced locations along a pipe. Within this measurement principle, variations in transit time are assumed to correlate with properties that convect with the flow, such as vortical structure, inhomogeneities in flow composition, and temperature variations to name a few.


CCUFs utilize high frequency acoustic signals, i.e. ultrasonics, to measure much lower frequency, time varying properties of structures in the flow. Like all other cross correlation based flow meters, the physical disturbances which cause the transit time variations should retain some level of coherence over the distance between the two sensors. CCUFs are typically much more robust to variations in fluid composition than the other ultrasonic-based flow measurement approaches such as transit time and Doppler based methods.


Transit time, defined as the time required for an ultrasonic beam to propagate a given distance, can be measured using a radially aligned ultrasonic transmitter and receiver. For a homogenous fluid with a no transverse velocity components flowing in an infinitely rigid tube, the transit time is given by the following relation:

t=D/Amix

where “t” is the transit time, D is the diameter of the pipe, and Amix is the speed of sound propagating through the fluid.


In such a flow, a variation in transit time is analogous to a variation in sound speed of the fluid. In real fluids however, there are many mechanisms, which could cause small variations in transit time which remain spatially coherent for several pipe diameters. For single phase flows, variations in the transverse velocity component will cause variations in transit time. Variations in the thermophysical properties of a fluid such as temperature or composition will also cause variations. Many of these effects convect with the flow. Thus, influence of transverse velocity of the fluid associated with coherent vortical structures on the transit time enables transit time based measurements to be suitable for cross correlation flow measurement for flows with uniform composition properties. The combination of sensitivity to velocity field perturbation and to composition changes make transit time measurement well suited for both single and multiphase applications.


Despite CCUFs functioning over a wide range of flow composition, standard transit time ultrasonic flow meters (TTUF) are more widely used. TTUFs tend to require relatively well behaved fluids (i.e. single phase fluids) and well-defined coupling between the transducer and the fluid itself TTUFs rely on transmitting and receiving ultrasonic signals that have some component of their propagation in line with the flow. While this requirement does not pose a significant issue for in-line, wetted transducer TTUFs, it does pose a challenge for clamp-on devices by introducing the ratio of sound speed in the pipe to the fluid as an important operating parameter. The influence of this parameter leads to reliability and accuracy problems with clamp-on TTUFs.


Signal-to-noise ratio (i.e., the ratio of a desired signal to a noise signal containing no useful information) is very often an issue with flow meters that utilize non-wetted ultrasonic sensors that send and receive signals through the walls of the vessel (e.g., pipe) in which the fluid flow is passing. In addition, differences in material properties between the pipe walls and the fluid flow traveling therein can create impedance mismatches that inhibit signal propagation. Attenuated signals undesirably decrease the signal-to-noise ratio, and likely also decrease the accuracy of information available from the signal. Consequently, it would be desirable to provide a method for improving the strength and quality of a signal produced and received by an ultrasonic sensor unit utilized within a flow meter, and an apparatus operable to do the same.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a method for improving the strength and quality of a signal produced and received by an ultrasonic sensor unit utilized within a flow meter, and an apparatus operable to do the same.


According to the present invention, a method for measuring at least one parameter of a fluid flowing through an internal passage of an elongated body is provided. The internal passage is disposed between a first wall and a second wall, and the first wall and the second wall each include an interior surface and an exterior surface. The method includes the steps of providing an array of at least two ultrasonic sensor units, operating the sensor units to transmit ultrasonic signals at one or more frequencies substantially coincident with at least one frequency at which the transmitted ultrasonic signals resonate within the first wall, receiving the ultrasonic signals with the sensor units, and processing the received ultrasonic signals to measure the at least one parameter of fluid flow within the internal passage.


According to present invention, a method for sensing flow within an internal passage of a pipe is provided. The internal passage is disposed between a first wall of the pipe and a second wall of the pipe. The method includes the steps of providing a flow meter having an array of at least two ultrasonic sensor units, operating the sensor units to transmit ultrasonic signals at one or more frequencies substantially coincident with at least one frequency at which the transmitted ultrasonic signals resonate within the first wall, and receiving the ultrasonic signals with the sensor units.


In some embodiments of the present method, ultrasonic transmitters within the sensor units are pulsed between an active period when ultrasonic signals are transmitted and an inactive period when ultrasonic signals are not transmitted. The active periods each have a duration sufficient to enable the transmitted ultrasonic signals resonating within the first wall to increase in amplitude an amount that readily distinguishes the transmitted ultrasonic signals from signal noise.


In some embodiments, one or more of the sensor units further includes the ability to receive ultrasonic signals transmitted from the transmitter and reflected within the first wall. This can be accomplished by using a transmitter capable of acting as a receiver, or by using an independent feedback ultrasonic receiver located on the exterior surface of the first wall proximate the transmitter.


According to the present invention, an apparatus for sensing flow within an internal passage of a pipe is provided. The internal passage of the pipe is disposed between a first wall of the pipe and a second wall. The apparatus includes an array of at least two ultrasonic sensor units. Each sensor unit includes an ultrasonic transmitter mountable on an exterior surface of the first wall and an ultrasonic receiver mountable on an exterior surface of the second wall and substantially aligned with the transmitter to receive ultrasonic signals transmitted therefrom. The apparatus further includes a processor adapted to operate the ultrasonic transmitters to transmit ultrasonic signals at one or more frequencies substantially coincident with at least one frequency at which the transmitted ultrasonic signals resonate within the first wall of the pipe, and adapted to receive signals from the ultrasonic receivers.


The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments thereof.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from a consideration of the subsequent detailed description presented in connection with accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a flow meter having an array of ultrasonic sensor units disposed axially along a pipe for measuring the volumetric flow of the fluid flowing in the pipe, in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 1A is the same block diagram as that shown in FIG. 1, with the exception that independent feedback receivers are included.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an alternative embodiment of a sensing device of a flow meter embodying the present invention similar to that shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a pipe having a turbulent pipe flowing having coherent structures therein, in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a frequency-amplitude graph showing transmitted spectra, with high peaks in amplitude representing resonant conditions.



FIG. 5 is a frequency-amplitude graph showing reflected spectra, with sharp valleys in amplitude representing resonant conditions.



FIG. 6 is diagrammatic representation illustrating the application of a signal monitoring technique wherein a dither at a frequency of w is applied to a fundamental resonance frequency Fr.





BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a flow meter, generally shown as 10, is provided to measure the velocity and/or volumetric flow rate of a single phase fluid 12 (e.g., gas, liquid or liquid/liquid mixture) and/or a multi-phase mixture 12 (e.g., process flow) flowing through an elongated body having an internal passage such as a pipe 14. For ease of description, the term “pipe” will be used hereinafter in place of the aforesaid “elongated body”. The present invention is not, however, limited to use with circular cross-section pipes, however. The multi-phase mixture may be a two-phase liquid/gas mixture, a solid/gas mixture or a solid/liquid mixture, gas entrained liquid or a three-phase mixture.


The flow meter 10 embodiment shown in FIG. 1 includes a sensing device 16 comprising an array of ultrasonic sensor units 18-21 The array includes at least two ultrasonic sensor units and may have as many as “N” number of ultrasonic sensor units, where “N” is an integer. Each sensor unit comprises a pair of ultrasonic sensors 40, 42, one of which functions as a transmitter (Tx) 40 and the other as a receiver (Rx) 42. The sensor units 18-21 are spaced axially along the outer surface 22 of a pipe 14 having a process flow 12 propagating therein, at locations x1, x2, x3, . . . xN, respectively. The distances between sensor units should be known or determinable; but do not necessarily have to be uniform. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the pair of sensors 40, 42 within each sensor unit is diametrically disposed on the pipe to provide a through transmission configuration, such that the sensors transmit and receive an ultrasonic signal that propagates through the fluid substantially orthogonal to the direction of the flow of the fluid within the pipe. The ultrasonic sensors 18-21 are clamped onto, or are otherwise attached to, the outer surface 22 of the pipe 14. The embodiment shown in FIG. 1 diagrammatically shows transmitters 40 attached to a first wall portion 23 of the pipe 14 and the receivers 42 diametrically disposed and attached to a second wall portion 25 of the pipe 14. Externally attached sensor units 18-21 may be referred to as “non-wetted”, as opposed to “wetted” sensor units which are in direct contact with the process flow.



FIG. 2 illustrates an alternative sensor arrangement wherein the transmitter (Tx) 40 and receiver (Rx) 42 of each sensor unit 18-21 may be offset axially such that the ultrasonic signal from the transmitter sensor has an axial component in its propagation direction, as shown in FIG. 2. Although diametrically disposed sensors 40, 42 are preferred, the sensors 40, 42 may alternatively simply oppose each other on the pipe. In addition, the sensor units 18-21 may be at different radial location on the pipe compared to each other.


Referring back to FIG. 1, each pair of ultrasonic sensors 40, 42 is operable to measure a transit time (i.e., time of flight (TOF), or phase modulation) of an ultrasonic signal propagating through the process flow 12 from the transmitting sensor 40 to the receiving sensor 42. The transit time measurement or variation is indicative of a coherent property that convects with the flow 12 within the pipe (e.g., vortical disturbances, inhomogeneities within the flow, temperature variations, bubbles, particles, pressure disturbances), which are indicative of the velocity of the process flow 12. The ultrasonic sensors may operate at practically any frequency. It has been found, however, that higher frequency sensors are more suitable for single phase fluids and lower frequency sensors are more suitable for multiphase fluids. The optimum frequency of the ultrasonic sensor is therefore related to the size or type of particle or substance propagating with the flow 12, and is also related to resonant frequencies of the pipe as will be discussed below. Examples of frequency used for a flow meter embodying the present invention are 1 MHz and 5 MHz. The ultrasonic sensors may provide a pulsed, chirped or continuous signal through the process flow 12. An example of a sensor 40, 42 that may be used is Model no. 113-241-591, manufactured by Krautkramer.


The ultrasonic signals injected into the pipe 14 can, if tuned properly, create a resonant response within one or both walls 23, 25 of the pipe 14. The resonant response amplifies the ultrasonic signal as it passes through the first wall 23, thereby increasing the ultrasonic signal entering the flow within the pipe 14. Likewise, the ultrasonic signal entering the second wall 25 of the pipe 14 from the flow 12 may also be amplified by the resonant response within the second wall 25, thereby increasing the ultrasonic signal to be sensed by the receiver. As a result, the signal-to-noise ratio of the sensor unit is improved.


The tuning of the sensor Units 18-21 to produce an ultrasonic frequency operable to create a resonant response within a pipe system can be done in a variety of different ways; e.g., by initially collecting empirical data from a similar type pipe system or the actual pipe system itself or the tuning can be done in real-time during use of the flow meter. For example, the drive frequency of the transmitter can be slowly adjusted to maximize the through signal, and the relevant frequency(ies) identified. The sensor units may be fine tuned by using a dithering technique as is described below. FIG. 4 shows an amplitude-frequency plot of a pipe system subjected excitation frequencies, where the high peaks indicate resonant conditions.


Once an ultrasonic frequency operable to create a resonant response within the pipe (i.e., a fundamental resonance frequency) is selected, the signal received by the receiver 42 of each sensor unit 18-21 can be periodically or continuously monitored to evaluate whether the received signal intensity is optimal. Changes in signal intensity can occur due to factors such as temperature induced frequency shifts in the pipe system, frequency changes within the driving electronics, etc. One method for monitoring the resonant condition (i.e., tuning the injected frequency to the resonance condition), is to put a slight dither on the fundamental resonance frequency (Fr) as is illustrated in FIG. 6. A dither with a frequency of w will induce an amplitude modulation of 2ω at the received signal as the dither traverses the peak of the resonance waveform. The receiving electronics can then bandpass filter on the 2ω signal and feed a correction signal to the transmitting electronics to optimize the 2ω component. Dithering represents an exemplary technique for monitoring and optimizing the signal received by the receiver, but is not the only such technique that can be used with the present invention. For example, other techniques include introducing an oscillation to help optimize the injected frequency for maximum signal, which maximum signal helps correlate the received signal from noise within the system.


In an alternative embodiment, monitoring of the resonant condition can be accomplished by sensing signal spectra reflected within the first wall of the pipe. The monitoring can be performed by the transmitter acting as a receiver, or it can be performed using an independent feedback receiver 41 (see FIG. 1A) located proximate the transmitter 40 in each sensor unit 18-21. In this embodiment, the feedback receiver monitors signal spectra reflected within the first wall of the pipe. A processor 37 (see below) is adapted to receive signals from the feedback ultrasonic receiver representative of the ultrasonic signals reflected within the first wall, and identify a minimum reflected signal indicative of the resonant condition. FIG. 5 shows a diagrammatic plot of spectra reflected within the first wall. The deep valleys represent minimum reflected signals indicative of resonant conditions within the pipe, where the majority of the energy is transmitted through rather than reflected back. In this case, the preferred operation point of the sensor unit 18-21 would be the frequency associated with the minimum (i.e., deep valley). As indicated above, the performance of the sensor unit can be monitored using techniques such as dithering.


In addition to improving the performance of the sensor unit 18-21 by finding and using a resonant condition, the present invention also includes improving the performance of the sensor unit by determining a preferred transmitter pulse duration for a sensor unit 18-21. The above-described resonant response builds in intensity within the wall 23, 25 for a period of time, beginning when the fundamental response frequency is first introduced into the pipe wall 23, 25. The resonant response will reach a maximum intensity (i.e., the transmitted signal reaching a maximum amplitude) after a period of time, at which point dampening within the pipe system prevents any further increase in intensity. The period of time from start to maximum intensity represents a preferred pulse duration for the injected signal. Less than the preferred pulse duration results in a less than optimum signal amplification, and more than the preferred pulse duration results in no more than the optimum signal amplification. The preferred pulse duration will likely vary from system to system due to factors such as pipe wall thickness, material, operating temperature, etc., and can be determined by tuning the system prior to using it, or the tuning can be done in real time while the system is in use, or a combination of both.


An ultrasonic signal processor 37 fires the transmitter sensors 40 in response to a firing signal 39 from a processor 24 and receives the ultrasonic output signals S1(t)−SN(t) from the receiver sensors 42. The signal processor 37 processes the data from each of the sensor units 18-21 to provide an analog or digital output signal T1(t)−TN(t) indicative of the time of flight or transit time of the ultrasonic signal through the process flow 12. The signal processor 37 may also provide an output signal indicative of the amplitude (or attenuation) of the ultrasonic signals. One such signal processor is model number USPC 2100 manufactured by Krautkramer Ultrasonic Systems. Measuring the amplitude of ultrasonic signal is particularly useful and works well for measuring the velocity of a fluid that includes a substance in the flow (e.g., multiphase fluid or slurry).


The output signals (T1(t)−TN(t)) of the ultrasonic signal processor 37 are provided to the processor 24, which processes the transit time measurement data to determine a parameter such as the volumetric flow rate of the process flow. The transit time or time of flight measurement is defined by the time it takes for an ultrasonic signal to propagate from the transmitting sensor 40 to the respective receiving sensor 42 through the pipe wall and the process flow 12. The effect of the vortical disturbances (and/or other inhomogeneities within the fluid) on the transit time of the ultrasonic signal is to delay or speed up the transit time. Therefore, each sensing unit 18-21 provides a respective output signal T1(t)−TN(t) indicative of the variations in the transit time of the ultrasonic signals propagating orthogonal to the direction of the process flow 12. The transit time measurement is derived by interpreting the convecting coherent property and/or characteristic within the process piping using at least two sensor units 18, 19.


In one example, the flow meter 10 measures the volumetric flow rate by determining the velocity of vortical disturbances 45 (e.g., coherent structures such as “turbulent eddies”; see FIG. 2) propagating with the flow 12 using the array of ultrasonic sensors 18-21. Coherent structures 45 are an inherent feature of turbulent boundary layers present in all turbulent flows. The ultrasonic sensor units 18-21 measure the transmit time T1(t)−TN(t) of the respective ultrasonic signals between each respective pair of sensors 40, 42, which varies due to the vortical disturbances as these disturbances convect within the flow 12 through the pipe 14 in a known manner. Therefore, the velocity of these vortical disturbances is related to the velocity of the process flow 12 and hence the volumetric flow rate may be determined. The volumetric flow rate may be determined by multiplying the velocity of the process flow 12 by the cross-sectional area of the pipe.


The overwhelming majority of industrial process flows 12 involve turbulent flow. Turbulent fluctuations within the process flow 12 govern many of the flow properties of practical interest including the pressure drop, heat transfer, and mixing. For engineering applications, considering only the time-averaged properties of turbulent flows is often sufficient for design purposes. For sonar based array processing flow metering technology, understanding the time-averaged velocity profile in turbulent flow 12 provides a means to interpret the relationship between speed at which coherent structures 45 convect and the volumetrically averaged flow rate.


Turbulent pipe flows 12 are highly complex flows. Predicting the details of any turbulent flow is problematic, although much is known regarding the statistical properties of the flow. For instance, as indicated above, turbulent flows contain self-generating, coherent vortical structures such as “turbulent eddies” 45. The maximum length scale of coherent structures 45 is set by the diameter of the pipe 14. These structures 45 remain coherent for several pipe diameters downstream, eventually breaking down into progressively smaller structures until the energy is dissipated by viscous effects.



FIG. 3 diagrammatically illustrates the relevant flow features of turbulent pipe flow 12 along with an axial array of ultrasonic sensor units 18-21, each sensor unit having a transmitter unit 40 and a receiver unit 42. As shown, the time-averaged axial velocity is a function of radial position, from zero at the wall to a maximum at the centerline of the pipe. The flow 12 near the wall is characterized by steep velocity gradients and transitions to relatively uniform core flow near the center of the pipe 14. Vortical structures (e.g., “turbulent eddies”) are superimposed over the time averaged velocity profile. These coherent structures contain temporally and spatially random fluctuations with magnitudes typically less than ten percent (10%) of the mean flow velocity and are carried along with the mean flow. Experimental investigations have established that turbulent eddies 45 generated within turbulent boundary layers remain coherent for several pipe diameters and convect at roughly eighty percent (80%) of maximum flow velocity (Schlichting, 1979).


The ultrasonic sensors provide transit time-varying signals T1(t), T2(t), T3(t), TN(t) to the signal processor 24 to known Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) logics 30-33, respectively. The FFT logics 30-33 calculate the Fourier transform of the time-based input signals T1(t)−TN(t) and provide complex frequency domain (or frequency based) signals T1ω, T2ω, T3ω, TNω indicative of the frequency content of the input signals. Techniques other than FFTs can be used to obtain the frequency domain characteristics of the signals T1(t)−TN(t). The frequency signals T1ω−TNω are fed to an array processor 36, which provides a flow signal 40 indicative of the volumetric flow rate of the process flow 12 and a velocity signal 42 indicative of the velocity of the process flow.


One technique of determining the convection velocity of the vortical disturbances within the process flow 12 involves characterizing the convective ridge of the vortical disturbances using an array of unsteady ultrasonic sensors or other beam forming techniques, similar to that shown in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/729,994, filed Dec. 4, 2000, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Determining the Flow Velocity Within a Pipe”, which is incorporated herein by reference.


The flow metering methodology uses the convection velocity of coherent structure with turbulent pipe flows 12 to determine the volumetric flow rate. The convection velocity of these turbulent eddies 45 is determined by applying array processing techniques to determine the speed at which the eddies convect past the axial ultrasonic sensor array distributed along the pipe 14, similar to that used in the radar and sonar fields. U. S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2004/0199340, published Oct. 7, 2004, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses an example of an acceptable array processing technique. The prior art teaches many sensor array processing techniques, however, and the present invention is not restricted to any particular technique.


While the present invention describes a flow meter having an array of ultrasonic meters to measure the velocity of the vortical disturbances within the flow 12, the present invention contemplates that the ultrasonic sensors 18-21 measures any property and/or characteristic of the flow 12 that convects with the flow (e.g., vortical disturbances, inhomogeneities within the flow, temperature variations, acoustic wave variations propagating within the pipe, bubbles, particles, pressure disturbances)


It should be understood that any of the features, characteristics, alternatives or modifications described regarding a particular embodiment herein may also be applied, used, or incorporated with any other embodiment described herein.


Although the invention has been described and illustrated with respect to exemplary embodiments thereof the foregoing and various other additions and omissions may be made therein and thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Numerous other modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, and the appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements.

Claims
  • 1. A method for measuring at least one parameter of a fluid flowing through an internal passage of an elongated body, which internal passage is disposed between a first wall and a second wall, and the first wall and the second wall each include an interior surface and an exterior surface, the method comprising: providing an array of at least two ultrasonic sensor units, each sensor unit including an ultrasonic transmitter mounted on the exterior surface of the first wall and an ultrasonic receiver located on the exterior surface of the second wall and substantially aligned with the transmitter;wherein each sensor unit further includes a feedback ultrasonic receiver located on the exterior surface of the first wall, and each feedback receiver is operable to receive ultrasonic signals transmitted from the transmitter and reflected within the first wall;operating the ultrasonic transmitters to transmit ultrasonic signals through the first wall, at one or more frequencies substantially coincident with at least one frequency at which the transmitted ultrasonic signals resonate within the first wall, in a manner that increases a signal-to-noise ratio of the ultrasonic signals by using resonance of the ultrasonic signals within the first wall to increase the amplitude of the ultrasonic signals traveling through the first wall, and thereby increase the amplitude of the ultrasonic signals transmitted into the internal passage;receiving the ultrasonic signals with the ultrasonic receivers; andprocessing the received ultrasonic signals to measure the at least one parameter of fluid flow within the internal passage.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the transmitter operates as the feedback ultrasonic receiver.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the feedback ultrasonic receiver is independent of the transmitter.
  • 4. A method for sensing flow within an internal passage of a pipe, which passage is disposed between a first wall of the pipe and a second wall of the pipe, the method comprising: providing a flow meter having an array of at least two ultrasonic sensor units, each sensor unit including an ultrasonic transmitter mounted on an exterior surface of the first wall and an ultrasonic receiver located on an exterior surface of the second wall and substantially aligned with the transmitter;wherein each sensor unit further includes a feedback ultrasonic receiver located on the exterior surface of the first wall, and each feedback receiver is operable to receive ultrasonic signals transmitted from the transmitter and reflected within the first wall;operating the ultrasonic transmitters to transmit ultrasonic signals through the first wall, at one or more frequencies substantially coincident with at least one frequency at which the transmitted ultrasonic signals resonate within the first wall, in a manner that increases a signal-to-noise ratio of the ultrasonic signals by using resonance of the ultrasonic signals within the first wall to increase the amplitude of the ultrasonic signals traveling through the first wall, and thereby increase the amplitude of the ultrasonic signals transmitted into the internal passage; andreceiving the ultrasonic signals with the ultrasonic receivers.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the transmitter operates as the feedback ultrasonic receiver.
  • 6. An apparatus for sensing flow within an internal passage of a pipe, which passage is disposed between a first wall of the pipe and a second wall of the pipe, the apparatus comprising: an array of at least two ultrasonic sensor units, each sensor unit including an ultrasonic transmitter mounted on an exterior surface of the first wall and an ultrasonic receiver located on an exterior surface of the second wall and substantially aligned with the transmitter to receive ultrasonic signals transmitted therefrom; anda processor adapted to operate the ultrasonic transmitters to transmit ultrasonic signals through the first wall at one or more frequencies substantially coincident with at least one frequency at which the transmitted ultrasonic signals resonate within the first wall of the pipe, in a manner that increases a signal-to-noise ratio of the ultrasonic signals by using resonance of the ultrasonic signals within the first wall to increase the amplitude of the ultrasonic signals traveling through the first wall, and thereby increase the amplitude of the ultrasonic signals transmitted into the internal passage, and adapted to receive signals from the ultrasonic receivers;wherein each sensor unit further includes a feedback ultrasonic receiver located on the exterior surface of the first wall, and each feedback receiver is operable to receive ultrasonic signals transmitted from the transmitter and reflected within the first wall.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the processor is adapted to receive signals from the feedback ultrasonic receiver representative of the ultrasonic signals reflected within the first wall, and identify a minimum reflected signal indicative of the resonant condition.
Parent Case Info

Applicant hereby claims priority benefits under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/858,323 filed Nov. 9, 2006, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (137)
Number Name Date Kind
2874568 Petermann Dec 1955 A
3715709 Zacharias et al. Feb 1973 A
3751979 Ims Aug 1973 A
3781895 Monser Dec 1973 A
3851521 Ottenstein Dec 1974 A
3885432 Herzl May 1975 A
RE28686 Coulthard Jan 1976 E
3952578 Jacobs Apr 1976 A
3987674 Baumoel Oct 1976 A
4004461 Lynworth Jan 1977 A
4032259 Brown Jun 1977 A
4048853 Smith et al. Sep 1977 A
4080837 Alexander et al. Mar 1978 A
4195517 Kalinoski et al. Apr 1980 A
4248085 Coulthard Feb 1981 A
4320659 Lynnworth et al. Mar 1982 A
4445389 Potzick et al. May 1984 A
4520320 Potzick et al. May 1985 A
4561310 Barnard et al. Dec 1985 A
4677305 Ellinger Jun 1987 A
4717159 Alston et al. Jan 1988 A
4896540 Shakkottai et al. Jan 1990 A
4932262 Wlodarczyk Jun 1990 A
5040415 Barkhoudarian Aug 1991 A
5060506 Douglas Oct 1991 A
5083452 Hope Jan 1992 A
5218197 Carroll Jun 1993 A
5285675 Colgate et al. Feb 1994 A
5289726 Miau et al. Mar 1994 A
5359897 Hamstead et al. Nov 1994 A
5363342 Layton et al. Nov 1994 A
5367911 Jewell et al. Nov 1994 A
5398542 Vasbinder Mar 1995 A
5524475 Kolpak et al. Jun 1996 A
5526844 Kamen et al. Jun 1996 A
5591922 Segeral et al. Jan 1997 A
5625140 Cadet et al. Apr 1997 A
5708211 Jepson et al. Jan 1998 A
5741980 Hill et al. Apr 1998 A
5770805 Castel Jun 1998 A
5770806 Hiismaki Jun 1998 A
5835884 Brown Nov 1998 A
5845033 Berthold et al. Dec 1998 A
5856622 Yamamoto et al. Jan 1999 A
5948959 Peloquin Sep 1999 A
6016702 Maron Jan 2000 A
6062091 Baumoel May 2000 A
6151958 Letton et al. Nov 2000 A
6202494 Riebel et al. Mar 2001 B1
6233374 Ogle et al. May 2001 B1
6261232 Yokosawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6293156 Shen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6345539 Rawes et al. Feb 2002 B1
6349599 Lynnworth et al. Feb 2002 B1
6354147 Gysling et al. Mar 2002 B1
6378357 Han et al. Apr 2002 B1
6397683 Hagenmeyer Jun 2002 B1
6412353 Kleven et al. Jul 2002 B1
6435030 Gysling et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442996 Thurston et al. Sep 2002 B1
6443226 Diener et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450037 McGuinn et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463813 Gysling Oct 2002 B1
6532827 Ohnishi Mar 2003 B1
6536291 Gysling et al. Mar 2003 B1
6550342 Croteau et al. Apr 2003 B2
6558036 Gysling et al. May 2003 B2
6587798 Kersey et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601005 Eryurek et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601458 Gysling et al. Aug 2003 B1
6609069 Gysling Aug 2003 B2
6626049 Ao Sep 2003 B1
6658945 Kleven Dec 2003 B1
6672163 Han et al. Jan 2004 B2
6681641 Baumoel Jan 2004 B2
6691584 Gysling et al. Feb 2004 B2
6698297 Gysling Mar 2004 B2
6732575 Gysling et al. May 2004 B2
6773603 Moorehead et al. Aug 2004 B2
6782150 Davis et al. Aug 2004 B2
6813962 Gysling et al. Nov 2004 B2
6837098 Gysling et al. Jan 2005 B2
6837332 Rodney Jan 2005 B1
6862920 Gysling et al. Mar 2005 B2
6889562 Gysling et al. May 2005 B2
6898541 Gysling et al. May 2005 B2
6931945 Takeda et al. Aug 2005 B2
6971259 Gysling Dec 2005 B2
6988411 Gysling et al. Jan 2006 B2
7032432 Gysling et al. Apr 2006 B2
7509878 Sato et al. Mar 2009 B2
20020123852 Gysling et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129662 Gysling et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030038231 Bryant et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030047007 Baumoel Mar 2003 A1
20030089161 Gysling May 2003 A1
20030136186 Gysling et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030154036 Gysling et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030172743 Ao et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040006409 Liljenberg et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040011141 Lynnworth Jan 2004 A1
20040016284 Gysling et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040069069 Gysling et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040074312 Gysling Apr 2004 A1
20040144182 Gysling et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167735 Rothman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040168522 Bailey et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040168523 Bailey et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194539 Gysling Oct 2004 A1
20040199340 Gysling et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199341 Gysling et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210404 Gysling et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040226386 Croteau et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040231431 Bailey et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040255695 Gysling et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050000289 Gysling et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050005711 Gysling et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050005712 Gysling et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050005713 Winston et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050005912 Gysling et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050011258 Gysling et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050011279 Takeda et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050011283 Gysling et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050011284 Davis et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050012935 Kersey Jan 2005 A1
20050033545 Gysling Feb 2005 A1
20050039520 Davis et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044929 Gysling et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050044966 Gysling et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050050956 Gysling et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050061060 Banach et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050072216 Engel Apr 2005 A1
20050125166 Loose et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125170 Gysling et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050171710 Gysling et al. Aug 2005 A1
20080060448 Wiest et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080098824 Bailey et al. May 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
4306119 Sep 1994 DE
0290336 Nov 1988 EP
1186868 Mar 2002 EP
2210169 Jun 1989 GB
58048817 Mar 1983 JP
WO9314382 Jul 1993 WO
WO99067629 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0000793 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0046583 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0102810 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0250511 Jun 2002 WO
WO 2004063741 Jul 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080173100 A1 Jul 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60858323 Nov 2006 US