A joint generally consists of two relatively rigid bony structures that maintain a relationship with each other. Soft tissue structures spanning the bony structures hold the bony structures together and aid in defining the motion of one bony structure relative to the other. In the knee, for example, the bony structures are the tibia and the femur. Soft tissue such as ligaments, tendons, menisci, and capsule provide support to the tibia and femur. A smooth and resilient surface consisting of articular cartilage covers the bony structures. The articular surfaces of the bony structures work in concert with the soft tissue structures to form a mechanism that defines the envelop of motion between the structures. When fully articulated, the motion defines a total envelop of motion between the bony structures. Within a typical envelop of motion, the bony structures move in a predetermined pattern with respect to one another. In the example of the hip joint, the joint is a ball in socket joint that is inherently stable. The capsule and ligaments spanning the hip joint provide stability while the muscles provide motion.
The articular surfaces of the bony structure became damaged by a variety of diseases, accidents, and other causes. A common disorder of joints is degenerative arthritis. Degenerative arthritis causes progressive pain, swelling, and stiffness of the joints. As the arthritis progresses the joint surfaces wear away, resulting in contractures of the surrounding soft tissues that provide stability to the joint. Moreover, progression of the disease process increases pain and reduces mobility.
Treatment of the afflicted articular bone surfaces depends, among other things, upon the severity of the damage to the articular surface and the age and general physical robustness of the patient. Commonly, for advanced arthritis, joint replacement surgery is necessary wherein the articulating elements of the joint are replaced with artificial elements commonly consisting of a part made of metal articulating with a part made of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE).
A relatively young patient with moderate to severe degeneration of the hip joint is often treated with drug therapies. While drug therapies may temporarily provide relief of pain, progression of the disease, with resulting deformity and reduced function, ultimately necessitates surgery. Alternative treatments such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cortisone injections similarly provide only temporary relief of symptoms.
In severe situations, the entire articular surface of a bone may be replaced with an artificial surface, as, for example, when the acetabular socket and femoral head are replaced with a prosthetic device including an UHMWPE bearing to resurface the acetabulum and a polished metal or ceramic femoral head mounted to a stem extending into the medullary canal of the proximal femur to replace the femoral head. Joint replacement surgery has become a proven and efficacious method of alleviating pain and restoring function of the joint.
Current methods of preparing the rigid elements of a joint to receive components as in joint replacement surgery involve extensive surgical exposure. The exposure must be sufficient to permit the introduction of drills, reamers, broaches and other instruments for cutting or removing cartilage and bone that subsequently is replaced with artificial surfaces. For total hip replacement, the acetabular articular surface and subchondral bone is removed by spherical reamers, the femoral head is resected with an oscillating saw, and the proximal medullary canal is shaped with broaches. A difficulty with total hip replacement is that the invasiveness of the procedure causes significant interoperative blood loss and extensive rehabilitation because muscles and tendons must be released from the proximal femur to mobilize the femur and gain exposure of and access to the acetabular fossa.
Invasiveness. Conventional total hip arthroplasty is indicated for painful arthritis of the hip joint. The procedure involves exposing the hip joint through a large incision to provide the surgeon full visualization of the hip joint and the acetabular region and to provide access for surgical power instruments. In order to appropriately prepare the bony structures of the hip joint, the major muscles spanning the joint are commonly disrupted to gain adequate exposure of the joint. Steps of the procedure include removing the femoral head followed by reaming and broaching the proximal femoral canal to prepare a bony surface to support a hip stem. The stem is implanted and may be cemented in place, or press fit for bony ingrowth. The acetabulum is typically prepared using a hemispherical reamer to remove cartilage down to bleeding bone. Once the acetabulum is prepared, an acetabular component is implanted, either by cementing in place or press fitting for bony ingrowth. Surgical exposure is necessary to accommodate the bulk and geometry of the components as well as the instruments for bone preparation. The surgical exposure, which may be between six and twelve inches in length, may result in extensive trauma to the soft tissues surrounding the hip joint along with the release of muscles that insert into the proximal femur. The surgical exposure increases bleeding, pain, and muscle inhibition; all of which contribute to a longer hospitalization and rehabilitation before the patient can be safely discharged to home or to an intermediate care facility.
The prepared bony surfaces are technically referred to as the acetabular fossa, femoral canal and metaphyseal region of the femur. Prior to placing the final implants into the prepared spaces, a femoral trial, which may be the broach in some systems, is placed in the proximal femur along with a trial femoral head and neck, and an acetabular trial is placed into the acetabulum to facilitate trial range of motion and evaluation of hip stability prior to placement of the final total hip implants.
For patients who require hip replacement it is desirable to provide surgical methods and apparatuses that may be employed to gain surgical access to articulating joint surfaces, to appropriately prepare the bony structures, to provide artificial, e.g., metal or plastic, articular bearing surfaces, and to close the surgical site, all without substantial damage or trauma to associated muscles, ligaments or tendons. To attain this goal, a system and method is needed to enable articulating surfaces of the joints to be appropriately sculpted using minimally invasive apparatuses and procedures.
A system to enable minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty that will minimize soft tissue trauma and accelerate postoperative rehabilitation is needed. Further, because minimally invasive techniques inherently limit observation of the surgical site, compromising visualization of the prepared bony surfaces, a device is also needed for inspection of the prepared bony surfaces. During a surgical procedure, bone debris and blood will gather in the surgical site and require removal from time to time to visualize the acetabulum. After preparation of the acetabulum, an acetabular component is implanted. A variety of acetabular components such as cemented UHMWPE cups, cemented or press fit metal shells with UHMWPE, metal, or ceramic bearing liners are presently used. Typically, placement of a press fit shell requires an impaction force to fully seat the implant into support bone. However, the size and location of the minimally invasive incision may not be optimal for proper orientation and application of force to adequately seat and stabilize an acetabular implant. Thus, an impaction device is needed that allows for impaction of the acetabular component with the hip reduced or articulated for use with a minimally invasive exposure for total hip arthroplasty. It may also be desirable to use a surgical navigation system to position the acetabular implant.
The present invention provides a system and method for total joint replacement that involves minimally invasive surgical procedures. The instruments disclosed accomplish accurate bone preparation, implant orientation and implant fixation through a limited surgical exposure.
Thus, in one embodiment, the present invention provides a method of appropriately sculpting the articular surface of a second bone that normally articulates with a first bone. The method involves attaching a bone sculpting tool directly or indirectly to the first bone with the tool in bone sculpting engagement with the articular surface of the second bone, and then sculpting the articular surface of the second bone with the joint reduced and moving one bone with respect to the other. Optionally, the bone sculpting tool may be attached to a mount that is attached directly or indirectly to the first bone. In some situations, it may be desirable to distract the second bone from the first bone during surgery.
In a further embodiment, the invention provides a method of appropriately preparing the articular surface of a second bone that normally articulates with a first bone and implanting a prosthetic device. The method involves attaching a bone sculpting tool directly or indirectly to the first bone with the tool in bone sculpting engagement with the articular surface of the second bone, and then sculpting the articular surface by articulating one of the bones with respect to the other while bone preparation is performed. The bone sculpting tool may be attached to a bone mount that is directly or indirectly attached to or integral with a stem, trial, reamer or broach implanted in the medullary canal of a bone.
Specifically, for example, the invention may be used for replacing the surfaces of a femur and acetabulum through a minimal incision and with minimal disruption of musculotendinous structures about the hip. A typical incision for a minimally invasive total hip procedure is between two and four inches in length. It is noted that there may be some variation in incision length due to patient physiology, surgeon preferences, and/or other factors; the stated range is illustrative, not limiting. In addition to a small incision, care is taken to approach the joint capsule by separating tissues between muscle groups, rather than sectioning specific muscles. The invention includes; in various embodiments:
The MIAR is either a modular or non-modular construct that, for hip applications, comprises a femoral trial, a drive mechanism (either integral or separate) and a hemispherical reamer or similar device for removing cartilage and bone from the acetabular fossa. The reaming system enables placement of the components through a small incision and minimizes the number of components in the instrument set.
A fiber optic system is provided including a light source, fiber optic cable, imaging base and an imaging device and monitoring system to ensure proper preparation of the acetabulum.
An irrigation system and a suction system are provided. The irrigation and suction systems may be integral to the imaging base, or separate instruments available for use as needed during the procedure.
An acetabular component, such as a press fit shell, is implanted following preparation of the acetabulum. An impaction device is provided that allows for impaction of the acetabular component with the hip reduced or articulated in order to fully seat a press fit acetabular component into support bone of the acetabulum. The MIAI may not be needed with some acetabular components. A surgical navigation system for positioning the acetabular component may be used with the MIAI.
In the minimally invasive procedure, the hip is accessed through an incision adequate to expose the trochanteric fossa and allow resection of the femoral neck and removal of the femoral head and neck segment. The femoral canal is accessed through the trochanteric fossa and trochanteric region. Reamers, rasps and other devices as are known to those skilled in the art are used to prepare the proximal femur to receive a femoral implant by a sequence of reaming and broaching steps. Once prepared, the intramedullary canal and retained area of the femoral neck and trochanteric region are used to support the MIAR system to prepare the acetabulum.
In minimally invasive total hip surgery, the incision 20 is typically 6 cm as shown in
In contrast to the minimally invasive technique provided, a total hip replacement surgery involves exposing the hip joint through a large incision to provide the surgeon full visualization of the hip joint and the acetabular region and access for surgical power instruments. The femoral head is removed and the femoral canal is reamed and broached to prepare a bony surface to support a hip stem. The stem may be cemented in place, or press fit for bony ingrowth. The acetabulum is prepared, most typically using a hemispherical reamer attached to a surgical hand drill to remove cartilage down to bleeding bone. The surgical exposure as shown in
Minimally Invasive Acetabular Reamer System
As seen in
With reference to the hip joint, the femoral head is removed either before or after the femoral canal is reamed and broached to prepare a bony surface to support the hip stem or broach to be inserted. The minimally invasive acetabular reamer is mounted to the broach, reamer, trial femoral component or other device inserted into the proximal femur. It is possible to attach the MIAR directly to the proximal femur, however the instruments and the femoral implant provide an advantageous support structure as these instruments, such as rasps, broaches or trials, or the implant conform closely to the prepared bony surface and provides a rigid metal structure to which the MIAR may be mounted. Therefore, in the preferred embodiment, the MIAR is directly or indirectly attached to the femoral broach that is secured within the proximal femoral canal. It is noted that throughout the description rasps, trials, broaches, implants, and stems are used interchangeably in relation to the MIAR system. Additional embodiments include attachment of the MIAR directly to the femur, the femoral trial or the femoral implant. With the MIAR directly or indirectly attached to the femur, the reamer head is placed into the acetabulum. The MIAR is activated to initiate cartilage and bone removal as the femur is positioned. The operating surgeon controls the MIAR by placing and/or moving the leg as necessary to create a spherical reaming of the acetabulum.
The femoral trials are available in an array of sizes to accommodate the size range of the proximal femur. The hemispherical reamers are available in a range of diameters to accommodate the size range of the acetabulum. In the preferred embodiment, the drive mechanism is interchangeable amongst the femoral trails and amongst the hemispherical reamers. An alternate embodiment includes a drive mechanism for each femoral trial, or groups of trials. The trials may be grouped by size, or by right and left. The example given is for the MIAR attached directly or indirectly to a femoral rasp. Similar combinations are possible when the drive mechanism is directly or indirectly attached to a femoral trial or femoral implant.
An example procedure according to the present invention includes the following steps: the appropriate femoral trial is placed into the prepared proximal femur; the drive mechanism is placed onto the proximal aspect of the femoral trial followed by placement of the appropriate sized hemispherical reamer onto the drive mechanism; the hip is reduced and the reaming system is activated to prepare the acetabulum. Of course, if the MIAR is not modular, it is placed as a unit, the hip is reduced, and the reaming system is activated.
As shown in
Support for the MIAR is provided by a femoral broach 32. The drive mechanism 33 is supported by the femoral broach 32.
As shown in
As shown in
The acetabulum is prepared by rotating or oscillating a hemispherical reamer within the acetabulum. Alternatively, non-mechanical cutting instruments such as lasers, water jet cutting, ultrasonic probes, chemical, or other devices to remove tissue can be used. In the current invention, such devices involve rotation or oscillation of the reamer with the device supported by the femur. As shown in
Alternatively, the drive mechanism may be configured for use with any one of the attachment mechanisms provided by various manufacturers of total hip systems to attach trial necks to femoral trials. The attachment thus may be a peg in groove, peg in hole, conical taper, a screw fit, or threaded attachment. In a preferred embodiment, the drive mechanism is designed to attach to a femoral trial or rasp/trial provided with the total hip system with which the MIAR is being used. The proximal surface of the drive mechanism is designed with a quick attach mechanism that fits an array of acetabular reamer sizes.
In another embodiment the drive mechanism is supported by the femoral taper that supports the femoral head implant or implant trial. The femoral stem trial is placed into the prepared femoral canal and the appropriate femoral neck trial is placed onto the stem trial. The drive mechanism is placed onto the femoral neck trial taper and the appropriate sized acetabular reamer is directly or indirectly attached to the drive mechanism. Optionally, the femoral stem trial and femoral neck trial may be integrally formed. In this approach, the femoral canal is prepared and the appropriate sized femoral stem is selected based on the patient's femoral anatomy. The femoral stem implant is placed into the prepared femur and the drive mechanism with appropriate sized acetabular reamers is placed onto the implant to prepare the acetabulum.
In alternate embodiments, the drive mechanism may be integral to the femoral trial or the acetabular reamers. The hemispherical reamers are modular and allow changing reamer sizes during the procedure. As seen in
In yet another embodiment the acetabular reamer is assembled in a collapsed state to allow ease of reduction of the hip joint with the MIAR system in place. The acetabular reamer is elongated from the femoral housing or from the drive or gear mechanism of the MIAR. This elongation may be accomplished by a variety of devices, for example shim plates, spacers, or other suitable device placed between the elements. Alternatively the MIAR may be elongated by means of pneumatic pressure, lead screw or other power sources. The manner by which the MIAR is elongated is not critical to the invention and any suitable device or method may be used. When sufficient resistance is encountered by the joint capsule and/or other soft tissue elements about the hip, the MIAR is activated to initiate acetabular bone preparation. The process of acetabular reaming is enhanced by pressure created through tensioning the soft tissue elements. In the example of using pneumatic force, gas pressure first elongates the MIAR construct and, after a specified amount of resistance is encountered to elongation, and pneumatic pressure is transferred to elements that generate torque to turn the acetabular reamer.
While minimally invasive techniques are advantageous from a patient rehabilitation perspective, they inherently limit observation of the surgical site. Visualization of the prepared bony surfaces is compromised by the limited access. As seen in
Additionally, during a surgical procedure, bone debris and blood will gather in the surgical site and may require periodic removal to enable visualization of the acetabulum. Therefore, an irrigation system and a suction system are provided. Irrigation channels 56 pass through the imaging base 50 and are directed towards the acetabulum. The irrigation and suction systems may be configured as integral to the imaging base 50, or provided as separate instruments available as needed during the procedure.
In practice, the surgeon may periodically stop the reamer and disarticulate the hip joint to view the preparation of the acetabulum. In a preferred embodiment, the imaging base is directly or indirectly attached to the femoral trial, along with the irrigation and suction systems, after the hemispherical reamer and drive mechanism are removed. The imaging base is placed in proximity to the acetabulum by repositioning the femur. The irrigation and suction systems may be used to clear the site of bone debris and blood. The site is illuminated via the fiber optic cable and light source. The digital camera, or other imaging device, images the prepared acetabulum via the fiber optic cable and displays the image on the monitor. Alternatively, if the irrigation and suction systems are separate devices, they are used to clear the site after the imaging base has been placed in proximity to the acetabulum.
Optionally, as seen in
In combination with the imaging and irrigation system, and with the MIAR, a device to apply slight positive pressure to the surgical site may be beneficial in controlling blood loss. Pressure may be generated by creating a sealed space over the incision, then applying a positive pressure within the surgical site.
Minimally Invasive Acetabular Impaction System
Once the acetabulum has been prepared, an acetabular implant is secured to the supporting bone, usually by either bone cement or press-fit. In the case of a cemented acetabular component, the bone surface is oversized relative to the implant size. The bony surface and the implant are covered with bone cement. The implant is then placed into the acetabulum and pressed into position forming a uniform layer of bone cement between the acetabular component and supporting bone. In the case of a press fit acetabular component, the bone surface is line-to-line or slightly undersized relative to the implant size. The implant is impacted into place in the supporting bone. In standard total hip surgery, a straight handled impactor is commonly used to impact the acetabular component. The extensive exposure typically used in traditional total hip surgery provides the clearance to align the impactor relative to the acetabulum. However, in the case of a minimally invasive total hip, the incision is too small to allow proper orientation of a standard straight handled impactor. Use of a standard impactor requires making a second incision to pass the impactor through muscle and tissue in the correct orientation relative to the acetabulum. The acetabular component must be positioned properly to provide normal function and to prevent dislocation of the hip joint. Making a second incision and disrupting more muscle is contrary to the goal of a minimally invasive procedure. Therefore, a device that impacts the acetabular component through a minimally invasive incision is needed. In one embodiment, the current invention includes a device designed to directly or indirectly attach to the femoral trial and provide an impaction force to properly seat the implant. A variety of acetabular components and methods for placement thereof may be used. Example components for implanting in the acetabulum include, but are not limited to, cemented shells or press fit cups.
As seen in
The impaction device may be powered by a pneumatic impaction hammer, a hydraulic piston, a linear actuator or solenoid, an electromechanical device, a spring activated device, or any other suitable force generating mechanism. The power source may originate outside of the operative site, or may be integral with the impaction device. As an alternative a hand held impactor with a handle angled to allow access through a minimally invasive incision may be used to impact the acetabular component. In a preferred embodiment, the impactor is a single ended air driven piston and cylinder as show in
After an impaction cycle the pressure to the primary tube 119 is released and the primary piston 118 is forced back into a retracted position by a return spring 114. When the primary piston 118 is in its retracted position the air pressure to the secondary tube 115 is released and the secondary piston 117 is pushed back into locked position by a secondary return spring 116. Pressure is reapplied to the primary tube 119 to charge the impactor and the cycle is repeated.
In surgical use, the cup impactor 102 and broach may be assembled outside of the surgical site, then placed into the prepared proximal femur. Alternatively, the broach may first be placed into the proximal femur, then the cup impactor 102 attached to the broach. With the cup impactor 102 in place, the cup adaptor 110 is attached to the cup implant and the recess 127 in the adapter is placed over the mating prominence 112 on the top of the cup impactor. The hip joint is reduced, placing the acetabular shell into the acetabulum. An alignment guide (not shown) is attached to the cup impactor to aid the surgeon in properly orientating the shell with respect to the pelvis. Alternatively, a surgical navigation system may be used to position the acetabular shell by referencing the cup impactor and the acetabulum. Once in position, the shell is impacted into the acetabulum by triggering the cup impactor with successive impactions. In a preferred embodiment the trigger releases one impaction, then the cup impactor resets for a further impaction, as necessary. In an alternate embodiment the trigger releases continuous impactions for the duration the trigger is on.
Or course the impaction device is suitable for use in placing an implant other than an acetabular component. The impaction device may be used for seating an implant in a second bone in any joint replacement wherein the implant may be placed on the impaction device, aligned with a second bone, and force imparted to the implant, the force being reacted with the first bone and the second bone.
A typical surgical procedure for the MIAR is as follows:
Using the instrumentation shown, the articular surface of the acetabulum may be sculpted according to the patient's individual physiology by articulating the femur with reference to the acetabulum. The method involves providing an apparatus having a bone sculpting tool directly or indirectly attached to a bone mount, such as a femoral trial stem, attaching the mount rigidly to the femur with the tool in bone sculpting engagement with the acetabulum, and then sculpting the acetabulum by articulating the femur with respect to the joint.
The hip joint is a ball in socket joint, hence rotation of the femur while supporting the MIAR will result in a spherical preparation of the acetabulum. Alternatively, the MIAR, having a suitable reamer and drive mechanism, may be placed into the acetabulum to remove bone without rotating the femur.
In a preferred embodiment, the trochanteric fossa is surgically accessed with a minimal disruption of muscle and tendon insertions to the trochanter and surrounding area. The approach may be at the posterior border of the gluteus medius and minimus, anterior in the interval between sartorius and rectus, or a direct lateral exposure. The hip may be dislocated posteriorly if a posterior approach is used or anteriorly if either a lateral or anterior approach is used. Alternatively, the hip may remain reduced while the femoral canal is prepared and the femoral neck is resected.
The femoral neck is resected and the femoral head is removed. The resection and removal may be performed with conventional cutting devices such as oscillating saws. The femur is oriented to align the femoral canal with the incision. The femoral canal is prepared using sequential reaming and broaching. Bony preparation is per the technique specified for the particular total hip stem being used and at the surgeon's discretion.
An appropriately sized femoral trial is placed into the femur. The drive mechanism is directly or indirectly attached to the femoral trial. Preferably, the drive mechanism is designed to mount directly onto the femoral trial.
The acetabular reamer is directly or indirectly attached to the drive mechanism. The appropriate acetabular reamer is selected by the surgeon. The surgeon may choose to measure the diameter of the removed femoral head as an aid in selecting the most appropriately sized acetabular reamer.
The hip joint is reduced and the hip is articulated with the drive mechanism and acetabular reamer in place. Elongation of the MIAR construct is optionally carried out to appropriately tension the soft tissue elements about the hip. The drive mechanism is activated to prepare the acetabulum. If necessary, the femur may be advanced while the hip joint is manipulated to ensure spherical and uniform reaming of the acetabulum. Imaging may be used to check the orientation and depth of the acetabular reamer.
At the surgeon's discretion, depth of reaming and uniformity of reaming may be checked periodically during the procedure. This may be done by dislocating the hip, removing the reamer and attaching the illumination and irrigation devices (or a combined illumination and irrigation device) to the femoral trial. The hip is reduced with the illumination and irrigating devices in place and the operative site is cleared with irrigation and suction. The prepared surface of the acetabulum may then be inspected. After inspection, the illumination and irrigation devices are removed and the drive mechanism and reamer are replaced. Alternatively, depth of reaming may be assessed under fluoroscopic imaging of the hip joint.
The articulation of the hip joint to prepare the acetabulum may be repeated with sequentially larger reamers until the appropriate size is reached. Further, the size and preparation may be checked with the illumination and irrigation devices as necessary. Once the appropriate size is reached, the acetabular reamer and the drive mechanism are removed.
After preparation of the acetabulum, an appropriate acetabular component is implanted. The appropriate acetabular component may be pre-selected or may be selected after surgical preparation of the acetabulum. If the desired component is a cemented cup, the cup is cemented in place.
If the desired component is a press fit cup, a cup impactor is attached to the broach and placed into the prepared proximal femur. Alternatively, the broach may be place in the prepared femoral canal first and then attach the cup impactor to the broach. The acetabular shell is attached to the cup adaptor and placed onto cup impactor. The hip joint is reduced and the shell is positioned in the acetabular fossa. An alignment guide is attached to the cup impactor to aid the surgeon in proper orientation of the shell during impaction. The cup impactor is triggered, thereby impacting the shell. An alternative technique for placing a press fit cup may use image guided surgery or an alignment device protruding from the incision. The guiding system is used to advance the cup into proper orientation. The MIAI impactor is activated to securely seat the cup into the acetabulum. Regardless of technique, after placement of the press fit cup, the impaction device is removed. Alternatively, a surgical navigation system may be used for positioning, aligning, and monitoring the cup or cup impactor during impaction. Cup monitoring includes real time evaluation of the cup position relative to anatomical landmarks captured by the surgical navigation system after preparing the acetabulum and before placing the cup so as to indicate cup seating and cup alignment.
The acetabular liner is placed into the shell and a trial femoral neck and head are placed onto the femoral trial. The range of motion and hip stability are checked and the appropriate femoral implant is selected. The femoral trials are removed and the femoral component is implanted per manufacturer specifications.
Additional steps as known to those skilled in the art may be performed within the scope of the invention. Further, one or more of the listed steps need not be performed in a procedure within the scope of the present invention.
This application is a Division of application Ser. No. 10/075,829, filed on Feb. 12, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,102 which is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 09/882,591, filed Jun. 14, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,482,209.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3953899 | Charnley | May 1976 | A |
3958278 | Lee et al. | May 1976 | A |
4085466 | Goodfellow et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4340978 | Buechel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4457307 | Stillwell | Jul 1984 | A |
4467801 | Whiteside | Aug 1984 | A |
4487203 | Androphy | Dec 1984 | A |
4524766 | Petersen | Jun 1985 | A |
4567885 | Androphy | Feb 1986 | A |
4574794 | Cooke et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4714474 | Brooks, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4759350 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4838891 | Branemark et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4898161 | Grundei | Feb 1990 | A |
4938762 | Wehrli | Jul 1990 | A |
4944760 | Kenna | Jul 1990 | A |
5002545 | Whiteside et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5030221 | Buechel et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5037423 | Kenna | Aug 1991 | A |
5047032 | Jellicoe | Sep 1991 | A |
5057112 | Sherman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5108400 | Appel et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108448 | Gautier | Apr 1992 | A |
D331461 | Lester | Dec 1992 | S |
5176683 | Kimsey et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
D337639 | Beckman | Jul 1993 | S |
5234433 | Bert et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250050 | Poggie et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263498 | Caspari et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5331975 | Bonutti | Jul 1994 | A |
5352230 | Hood | Oct 1994 | A |
5417693 | Sowden et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417695 | Axelson, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5423822 | Hershberger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5474560 | Rohr, Jr. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486178 | Hodge | Jan 1996 | A |
5540696 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5569255 | Burke | Oct 1996 | A |
5575793 | Carls et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578039 | Vendrely et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5609642 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624443 | Burke | Apr 1997 | A |
5658292 | Axelson, Jr. | Aug 1997 | A |
5667511 | Vendrely et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669914 | Eckhoff | Sep 1997 | A |
5681315 | Szabo | Oct 1997 | A |
5683469 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683470 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688280 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690636 | Wildgoose et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690638 | Dance et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693056 | Carls et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716360 | Baldwin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725596 | Burke | Mar 1998 | A |
5741264 | Cipolletti | Apr 1998 | A |
5769854 | Bastian et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776200 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788701 | McCue | Aug 1998 | A |
5795353 | Felt | Aug 1998 | A |
5800438 | Tuke et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810830 | Noble et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824098 | Stein | Oct 1998 | A |
5824104 | Tuke | Oct 1998 | A |
5827290 | Bradley | Oct 1998 | A |
5830216 | Insall et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851183 | Bucholz | Dec 1998 | A |
5880976 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885299 | Winslow et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891034 | Bucholz | Apr 1999 | A |
5919195 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925049 | Gustilo et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5951564 | Schroder et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951606 | Burke | Sep 1999 | A |
5976147 | LaSalle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976148 | Charpenet et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989261 | Walker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997543 | Truscott | Dec 1999 | A |
6002859 | DiGioia, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010509 | Delgado et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013081 | Burkinshaw et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018094 | Fox | Jan 2000 | A |
6056756 | Eng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059831 | Braslow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063091 | Lombardo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090114 | Matsuno et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096043 | Techiera et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106529 | Techiera | Aug 2000 | A |
6132468 | Mansmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6146390 | Heilbrun et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159214 | Michelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6165181 | Heilbrun et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179877 | Burke | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197064 | Haines et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201984 | Funda et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231611 | Mosseri | May 2001 | B1 |
6236875 | Bucholz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6283980 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290704 | Burkinshaw et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6332780 | Traxel et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6379367 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6711431 | Sarin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6917827 | Kienzle, III | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6953480 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7105028 | Murphy | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20010012967 | Mosseri | Aug 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19 64 781 | Dec 1969 | DE |
21 20 320 | Nov 1972 | DE |
28 30 566 | Jul 1978 | DE |
296 09 632 | Dec 1996 | DE |
200 21 494 | May 2001 | DE |
0 685 210 | May 1995 | EP |
0 709 061 | May 1996 | EP |
0 720 834 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0 720 834 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0 780 090 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0780 092 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0 824 904 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 824 904 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1 099 430 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 086 668 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 084 680 | May 2001 | EP |
2 266 492 | Oct 1975 | FR |
2 589 720 | Nov 1985 | FR |
WO 9959669 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030236523 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10075829 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10429435 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09882591 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 10075829 | US |