This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/400,969, filed 5 Aug. 2010.
The invention disclosed herein relates to apparatus and methods for waste reduction and improvements to the quality and production in web processing operations, such as diaper manufacturing. While the description provided relates to diaper manufacturing, the apparatus and method are easily adaptable to other applications.
Generally, diapers comprise an absorbent insert or patch and a chassis, which, when the diaper is worn, supports the insert proximate a wearer's body. Additionally, diapers may include other various patches, such as tape tab patches, reusable fasteners and the like. The raw materials used in forming a representative insert are typically cellulose pulp, tissue paper, poly, nonwoven web, acquisition, and elastic, although application specific materials are sometimes utilized. Usually, most of the insert raw materials are provided in roll form, and unwound and applied in assembly line fashion.
In the creation of a diaper, multiple roll-fed web processes are typically utilized. To create an absorbent insert, the cellulose pulp is unwound from the provided raw material roll and pulverized by a pulp mill. Discrete pulp cores are formed by a core forming assembly and placed on a continuous tissue web. Optionally, super-absorbent powder may be added to the pulp core. The tissue web is wrapped around the pulp core. The wrapped core is debulked by proceeding through a calendar unit, which at least partially compresses the core, thereby increasing its density and structural integrity. After debulking, the tissue-wrapped core is passed through a segregation or knife unit, where individual wrapped cores are cut. The cut cores are conveyed, at the proper pitch, or spacing, to a boundary compression unit.
While the insert cores are being formed, other insert components are being prepared to be presented to the boundary compression unit. For instance, the poly sheet is prepared to receive a cut core. Like the cellulose pulp, poly sheet material is usually provided in roll form. The poly sheet is fed through a splicer and accumulator, coated with an adhesive in a predetermined pattern, and then presented to the boundary compression unit. In addition to the poly sheet, which may form the bottom of the insert, a two-ply top sheet may also be formed in parallel to the core formation. Representative plies are an acquisition web material and a nonwoven web material, both of which are fed from material rolls, through a splicer and accumulator. The plies are coated with adhesive, adhered together, cut to size, and presented to the boundary compression unit. Therefore, at the boundary compression unit, three components are provided for assembly: the poly bottom sheet, the core, and the two-ply top sheet.
A representative boundary compression unit includes a die roller and a platen roller. When all three insert components are provided to the boundary compression unit, the nip of the rollers properly compresses the boundary of the insert. Thus, provided at the output of the boundary compression unit is a string of interconnected diaper inserts. The diaper inserts are then separated by an insert knife assembly and properly oriented. At this point, the completed insert is ready for placement on a diaper chassis.
A representative diaper chassis comprises nonwoven web material and support structure. The diaper support structure is generally elastic and may include leg elastic, waistband elastic and belly band elastic. The support structure is usually sandwiched between layers of the nonwoven web material, which is fed from material rolls, through splicers and accumulators. The chassis may also be provided with several patches, besides the absorbent insert. Representative patches include adhesive tape tabs and resealable closures.
The process utilizes two main carrier webs; a nonwoven web which forms an inner liner web, and an outer web that forms an outwardly facing layer in the finished diaper. In a representative chassis process, the nonwoven web is slit at a slitter station by rotary knives along three lines, thereby forming four webs. One of the lines is on approximately the centerline of the web and the other two lines are parallel to and spaced a short distance from the centerline. The effect of such slicing is twofold; first, to separate the nonwoven web into two inner diaper liners. One liner will become the inside of the front of the diaper, and the second liner will become the inside of the back of that garment. Second, two separate, relatively narrow strips are formed that may be subsequently used to cover and entrap portions of the leg-hole elastics. The strips can be separated physically by an angularly disposed spreader roll and aligned laterally with their downstream target positions on the inner edges of the formed liners.
After the nonwoven web is sliced, an adhesive is applied to the liners in a predetermined pattern in preparation to receive leg-hole elastic. The leg-hole elastic is applied to the liners and then covered with the narrow strips previously separated from the nonwoven web. Adhesive is applied to the outer web, which is then combined with the assembled inner webs having elastic thereon, thereby forming the diaper chassis. Next, after the elastic members have been sandwiched between the inner and outer webs, an adhesive is applied to the chassis. The chassis is now ready to receive an insert.
In diapers it is preferable to contain elastics around the leg region in a cuff to contain exudates for securely within the diaper. Typically, strands of elastic are held by a non-woven layer that is folded over itself and contains the elastics within the overlap of the non-woven material. The non-woven is typically folded by use of a plow system which captures the elastics within a pocket, which is then sealed to ensure that the elastics remain in the cuff.
Most products require some longitudinal folding. It can be combined with elastic strands to make a cuff. It can be used to overwrap a stiff edge to soften the feel of the product. It can also be used to convert the final product into a smaller form to improve the packaging.
To assemble the final diaper product, the insert must be combined with the chassis. The placement of the insert onto the chassis occurs on a placement drum or at a patch applicator. The inserts are provided to the chassis on the placement drum at a desired pitch or spacing. The generally flat chassis/insert combination is then folded so that the inner webs face each other, and the combination is trimmed. A sealer bonds the webs at appropriate locations prior to individual diapers being cut from the folded and sealed webs.
Roll-fed web processes typically use splicers and accumulators to assist in providing continuous webs during web processing operations. A first web is fed from a supply wheel (the expiring roll) into the manufacturing process. As the material from the expiring roll is depleted, it is necessary to splice the leading edge of a second web from a standby roll to the first web on the expiring roll in a manner that will not cause interruption of the web supply to a web consuming or utilizing device.
In a splicing system, a web accumulation dancer system may be employed, in which an accumulator collects a substantial length of the first web. By using an accumulator, the material being fed into the process can continue, yet the trailing end of the material can be stopped or slowed for a short time interval so that it can be spliced to leading edge of the new supply roll. The leading portion of the expiring roll remains supplied continuously to the web-utilizing device. The accumulator continues to feed the web utilization process while the expiring roll is stopped and the new web on a standby roll can be spliced to the end of the expiring roll.
In this manner, the device has a constant web supply being paid out from the accumulator, while the stopped web material in the accumulator can be spliced to the standby roll. Examples of web accumulators include that disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/110,616, which is commonly owned by the assignee of the present application, and incorporated herein by reference.
As in many manufacturing operations, waste minimization is a goal in web processing applications, as products having spliced raw materials cannot be sold to consumers. Indeed, due to the rate at which web processing machines run, even minimal waste can cause inefficiencies of scale. In present systems, waste materials are recycled. However, the act of harvesting recyclable materials from defective product is intensive. That is, recyclable materials are harvested only after an identification of a reject product at or near the end of a process. The result is that recyclable materials are commingled, and harvesting requires the extra step of separating waste components. Therefore, the art of web processing would benefit from systems and methods that identify potentially defective product prior to product assembly, thereby eliminating effort during recyclable material harvesting.
Furthermore, to improve quality and production levels by eliminating some potentially defective product, the art of web processing would benefit from systems and methods that ensure higher product yield and less machine downtime.
Provided are method and apparatus for minimizing waste and improving quality and production in web processing operations.
Importantly, the methods taught in the present application are applicable not only to diapers and the like, but in any web based operation. The waste minimization techniques taught herein can be directed any discrete component of a manufactured article, i.e., the methods taught herein are not product specific. For instance, the present methods can be applied as easily with respect to diaper components as they can for feminine hygiene products, as they can for face masks in which components such as rubber bands and nose pieces are used.
For instance, by practicing the methods of the present invention, waste of staples and elastic bands can be avoided during manufacture of face masks, for instance those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,131,442. One of the objectives is simply to recognize product during manufacture that ultimately would fail quality control inspection, and avoid placing material on to that product during the manufacturing processes.
As another example, the amount of adhesive applied to certain products can be reduced by not applying adhesive to products that have already been determined to be defected or assigned to rejection. For instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,320, adhesive application is shown for example in FIG. 11. By assigning or flagging product that has already been determined to end up in a scrap or recycling pile, the adhesive flow can be stopped or minimized
In yet another exemplary application of the methods of the present invention, discrete components or raw material carried on products that have already been determined to be defected or assigned to rejection can also be removed and recycled prior to commingling with other discrete components or raw material. For instance, if an absorbent pad, such as shown at reference numeral 40 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,320 is destined for application to a product that has already been determined to be defected or assigned to rejection, the absorbent pad can be withdrawn from the product, or never introduced in the first instance. For example, during startup or shutdown of high speed diaper manufacturing operations, a certain number of products is routinely discarded into recycling. By identification of the start up or shut down routine, avoidance of introduction of absorbent pads can be achieved. Alternatively, during stand-by, the absorbent pads often degrade by accumulation of dust. By identifying which products would bear the dust, the absorbent pads can be withdrawn from further manufacture, and no additional components would be applied to such a product.
In one embodiment, a method for assembling a plurality of continuous webs is provided, including defining first web inspection parameters and inspecting at least one of the plurality of continuous webs to determine whether the at least one web conforms to the first web inspection parameters. Further, the method involves providing a chassis web which is adapted to receive a patch and providing a patch web from which the patch is cut. Finally, the cut patch is applied to the chassis web if the inspected web conforms to the first web inspection parameters. In another embodiment, the method also includes steps of defining first patch inspection parameters and inspecting a cut patch to determine whether the patch conforms to the first patch inspection parameters. While the patch inspection may provide interesting diagnostic information related to a web processing machine, the application of the patch may be limited to those patches that conform to the first patch inspection parameters.
Another embodiment of the method of the present invention involves defining first web inspection parameters and a product pitch. Generally in any web process, a web is provided, which is traveling at a web velocity. This embodiment involves inspecting the web to determine whether the web conforms to the first web inspection parameters and producing an inspection value as a result of the inspecting step. This value is then recorded once per sample time interval. The sample time interval may be calculated by dividing the defined product pitch by the web velocity. While the inspection value may be as simple as a bivalent value, a more informational multivalent value may be used.
In addition to the web process provided, an apparatus for carrying out the process is provided. An embodiment of the apparatus includes a continuous web supply providing continuous web material from an upstream position to a downstream position and a means for providing a patch spaced from a first side of the continuous web material. A patch applicator is provided to alter the space between the patch providing means and the continuous web material and a web inspection device is positioned upstream from the patch applicator. Additionally, a programmable controller receives an input from the web inspection device and provides an output to the patch applicator. The web processing apparatus may also include a patch inspection device that provides an output to the programmable controller. A patch reject conveyor may be positioned to receive defective patches from the patch providing means. In another embodiment of a web processing apparatus, a product inspection device may be located downstream from the patch applicator to provide an output to the programmable controller. Also, a product reject conveyor could be adapted to divert defective product as indicated by the product inspection device.
One aspect of the present invention involves automatically correcting any cuff folding defects. Before entering the cuff folding system, the cuff material is first slit into two even width strips and then passes through a web guide. The cuff fold is created by passing the material over the elastic guide roller. Part of the cuff web extends over the edge of the elastic guide roller; it is this portion of cuff that is folded back on top of itself. As the cuff web passes over the elastic roller guide, two adhesive coated strands of elastic are laid down on top of the cuff web just before folding. The fold is completed as the cuff passes over the folding board with the elastic strands inside the fold. The cuff next passes over the chill roll to set the adhesive. During the folding of the cuff non-woven, the non-woven can become operatively disengaged with the plow, causing the overlap not to be formed, resulting in a product defect by which the cuff elastic is not captured within a pocket in the non-woven.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention which may be embodied in other specific structures. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
It is noted that the present waste minimization techniques and apparatus are described herein with respect to products such as diapers, but as previously mentioned, can be applied to a wide variety of processes in which discrete components are applied sequentially.
Referring to
The process continues through debulking, core cutting and spacing, optionally, compression, and application of tape and elastics. The process then proceeds with application of outer and inner non-woven layers, and waist elastic. The web can undergo folding, extraction and trimming of excess material, and application of material to tighten the diaper about the waist. Eventually, the product is folded and packaged.
As seen on
At each of these operations shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The process utilizes two main carrier webs; a nonwoven web 11 which forms an inner liner web, and a web 12 that forms an outwardly facing layer in the finished diaper 50. In this embodiment, the nonwoven web 11 is slit, at slitter station 15, by rotary knives 14 along three lines. One of these lines is preferably on approximately the centerline of web 11 and the other two lines are parallel to and spaced a short distance from the centerline. The effect is twofold; first, to separate web 11 into two inner liners 20. One liner will become the inside of the front of the diaper 50 and the second liner will become the inside of the back of that garment. Second, two separate, relatively narrow strips 22 and 24 are formed which are subsequently used to cover and entrap portions of leg-hole elastics 26. Strips 22 and 24 are separated physically by an angularly disposed spreader roll 23 and aligned laterally with their downstream target positions on the inner edges of the liner webs 20.
Adhesive patterns are applied to the liner webs 20 in target areas for the leg-hole elastics 26. A spray gun assembly 29 of a type known in the art is preferably used to apply the adhesive patterns. Two sets of leg-hole, elastic strands 26 are introduced through laydown guides 30, which reciprocate from side to side past each other. The strands 26 are glued to the web sections 20, their laydown patterns following a serpentine path. Given the absence of adhesive in the area separating the inner liners 20, for some portion of each successive diaper product, the strands 26 each track parallel to the inner slit edges of the web sections 20. Laydown guides 30 then apply the strands 26, which form leg-hole elastics as the web sections 20 are carried along the face of a drum or roll 32. Those parts of the elastic patterns which are near the inner slit edges of webs 20 are then covered by the introduction of an adhesive lamination thereover of the strips 22 and 24 of nonwoven web also against the drum 32.
The side-to-side excursions of the leg-hole elastic lay-down guides 30 result in arcuate segments of elastic strands extending on each side of the web centerline. After the nonwoven strips 22 and 24 have been applied to cover and entrap those parts of the elastics 26 that run nearest to and parallel to the inner edges of the webs 20, a second pair of slitter knives 34 is used to trim away a portion of the narrow nonwoven strips 22, 24, along with that part of the inner liner webs 20 to which they are laminated. This also removes those portions of the elastic strands 26 which are contained within the laminations. The resultant trimmed scrap strips 36 are removed from the process for disposal elsewhere.
The effect of the last-described step is to remove the cut away portions of the elastic, eliminating its corresponding unwanted gathering effect from the crotch region of the garments 50. The remaining portions of the curved elastic strands create a gathering effect around the leg openings of the finished garments 50.
Subsequent to the combining and trimming of the inner webs 20 and the cover strips 22, 24, the combining drum 32 carries the webs to a nip with a second combining drum 38, where the web sections 20, with their respective curved elastic patterns exposed, are transferred to and laminated adhesively against the inside face of outer liner web 12. This process entraps the curved elastic patterns 26 between the inner liners 20 and outer web 12 thereby forming a composite web 39.
The composite web 39 is then provided with a pattern of adhesive in preparation to receive an absorbent insert or patch 46. The patch 46 is cut from a provided patch web 40 by a cooperation of a cutter 41 and an anvil surface on a vacuum roll 42 and rotated into position for transfer to the composite web 39 by a patch applicator 105. If the patch 46 is to be applied to the web 39—a determination explained more fully below—the patch applicator 105 forces the web 39 against the patch 46, thereby adhering the patch 46 to the web 39.
Leg-hole materials 48, if not previously removed, are cut at a cutting station 47, thereby removing the material 48 contained within an approximate perimeter defined by the curved pattern of the elastics 26. The running composite chassis web 39 is folded, before or after cutting out of the leg holes, longitudinally along its centerline, thereby generally aligning its front waist edge with its back waist edge. The regions 53 which are to become the side seams 54 of the garments 50 are then welded by a sealing device 49 either ultrasonically or by heat. Note that the leg holes are preferably cut out before this point, leaving only a narrow zone for welding. The weld pattern is preferably wide enough to extend into both the left side seam of one garment and the right side seam of the adjacent garment. The garments 50 are then separated by passing through a cut-off knife assembly 55, which severs the web along the transverse axis of the side seam weld 53.
In addition to the exemplary components generally found in a web processing apparatus, the present device and methods further include an advanced defect detection system. An embodiment of the defect detection system preferably comprises at least one visual inspection station 101, but preferably a plurality of visual inspection stations 101. Each visual inspection station 101 may include a vision sensor, such as an In-Sight Vision Sensor available from Cognex Corporation of Natick, Mass. Since each component part of a product resulting from a web process has a point of incorporation into the product, visual inspection of each component part preferably occurs prior to the point of incorporation. The results of the visual inspections that occur are relayed from each visual inspection station 101 to a programmable logic controller (PLC) 103. Each visual inspection station 101 may provide diagnostic capability by monitoring lighting, focus and positioning.
Machine vision systems typically require digital input/output devices and computer networks to control other manufacturing equipment, in this case the splicing unit.
A typical machine vision system will consist of several among the following components:
The sync sensor determines when a part (often moving on a conveyor) is in position to be inspected. The sensor triggers the camera to take a picture of the part as it passes by the camera and often synchronizes a lighting pulse. The lighting used to illuminate the part is designed to highlight features of interest and obscure or minimize the appearance of features that are not of interest (such as shadows or reflections).
The camera's image can be captured by the framegrabber. A framegrabber is a digitizing device (within a smart camera or as a separate computer card) that converts the output of the camera to digital format (typically a two dimensional array of numbers, corresponding to the luminous intensity level of the corresponding point in the field of view, called pixel) and places the image in computer memory so that it may be processed by the machine vision software.
The software will typically take several steps to process an image. In this case, the image processing will result in either detection of the indicator material, or non-detection of the indicator material.
Commercial and open source machine vision software packages typically include a number of different image processing techniques such as the following:
In most cases, a machine vision system will use a sequential combination of these processing techniques to perform a complete inspection. A system that reads a barcode may also check a surface for scratches or tampering and measure the length and width of a machined component.
Additionally, machine downtime can be minimized by the provision of systems and methods for warning a machine operator of expected machine troubles so that scheduled maintenance can occur.
The PLC 103 includes software adapted to run several routines that may be initiated by some triggering event, such as an automatic detection of a defined condition or manual input by a machine operator. Some routines are run during machine setup while other routines are run during machine operation, while still other routines are run during machine diagnostics at some point during machine downtime.
The PLC 103 generally receives inputs 120 from the visual inspection stations 101, from the various machine components, or from manual input by a machine operator on an operator interface, or human machine interface (HMI) 115. Some of the inputs can also be from stations near the pulp rolls, pulp mills, forming rollers, or elsewhere in the system where inspection is present.
The HMI 115 provides an interface for user interaction with the web processing machinery and may comprise a pressure sensitive touch screen, a keyboard, a computer mouse, or even a wireless device providing such an interface. The PLC 103 preferably provides controlling outputs 121 to the patch applicator 105, the cutter 41 and vacuum roll 42, a patch reject conveyor 107 and a product reject conveyor 109.
The input to the PLC 103 from each inspection station 101 preferably comprises a defect indicator 111 that represents a detected web defect at a position in the process a number of patch placements from the patch applicator 105. That is, at any given time during machine operation, between any inspection station 101 and any patch applicator 105 in a web process, there exists material sufficient to produce a determinable number of products having a patch applied thereto. Therefore, a defect may be detected and flagged as corresponding to a specific product location throughout the process.
In determining whether a patch should be applied to a product by a patch applicator 105, the PLC 103 stores a product status indicator for each product in the process, preferably for each product between the product reject conveyor 109 and most remote visual inspection station 101. The status indicator accumulates defect indicators 111 from the inspection stations 101 to track the progress of a product through the process.
A preferred product status indicator is a byte of digital data, with each bit reflecting the defect indicator 111 for the tagged product from an inspection station 101. For example, the least significant bit in the status indicator may represent the defect indicator for the most remote visual inspection station 101. As the bit significance increases, so does the proximity of the respective inspection station 101 to the product reject conveyor 109. A byte of data would provide for the possibility of eight inspection stations, and specific tracking of defects at those inspection stations. To store the product status indicator, the PLC 103 preferably includes some volatile and some nonvolatile computer memory. The volatile memory may provide quicker access times during machine operation, while the nonvolatile memory could be used to store product status indicators when the machine is paused. The minimum amount of memory required by the PLC 103 is at least partly determined by the number of visual inspection stations 101 and the number of potential products in queue between the first visual inspection station 101 and the product reject conveyor 109. For example, if a web process utilizes eight visual inspection stations 101 and two hundred products could be in queue in any given time, a volatile memory of at least two hundred bytes would be required.
The visual inspection station outputs may be sampled synchronously, or the outputs may be asynchronously analyzed by the PLC 103. If synchronous, the outputs may be sampled at a rate equal to the speed of the traveling webs divided by the product pitch, or product size. To enable use of different product sizes in a given process, the sample timing of the inspection station results may be varied, accordingly.
In addition to synchronous sampling of the inspection station results, the results could be analyzed asynchronously, which may be advantageous if various materials are incorporated into the process at different rates. Asynchronous analysis of the outputs, however, may provide less visibility into the specific defects included in a completed product.
Prior to operating or running a web process, the machinery must be threaded with raw patch web material. The PLC 103 may provide a software routine, such as an automatic web threading routine, for aiding such setup. An operator threads the patch web material 40 through the machine to the patch applicator 105. The operator then initiates the automatic threading routine by using the HMI 115. The HMI 115 is coupled to the PLC 103 and the PLC 103 controls the patch applicator 105, patch cutter 41, vacuum roll 42, and patch reject conveyor 107. A first number of patches 46 are cut by the patch cutter 41 and culled via the patch reject conveyor 107. The culled patches 46a may be a predetermined number from the start of the threading routine, or cut patches 46 could be inspected by a visual inspection station 101, and culled until the patches 46 meet visual inspection parameters 108, as seen in
Also, if the machine was shut down or paused with existing patch web material loaded through the patch cutter, but a vacuum remains drawn through the vacuum anvil drum, the patch web material on the vacuum anvil drum will act as an air filter. The longer the patch web material is on the drum, the dirtier it will get. Such soiled material may not be used in the construction of products for sale. Therefore, the PLC 103 could provide a software routine for clearing the vacuum anvil drum of soiled web material. Patches that have been on the anvil for a predetermined amount of time, and therefore may have dust built up, are culled through the reject prior to machine startup. Like the automatic threading routine, a predetermined number of patches may be culled, or the patches may be inspected for dust build-up.
In addition to threading and anvil clearing, a placement accuracy routine could be provided, for use on machine startup, or when the product configuration is changed. In a representative placement accuracy routine, patches are placed to several startup reject products, and relevant dimensions are taken by a visual inspection station 101 placed downstream from the patch applicator 105. The inspection results indicate if and when the patch placement meets specified patch placement parameters.
During machine operation, the PLC 103, through software algorithms, determines whether a patch 46 should be placed by the patch applicator 105, whether the patch 46 should be culled, or whether the web 39 should be allowed to continue to run without patch placement. A patch 46 is placed on the moving chassis web 39 only if both the patch 46 and web 39 are in condition for satisfactory placement.
After machine setup and threading of any materials, the PLC 103 begins verifying status indicators at the <application> position in memory. Generally, during machine operation, the PLC 103 controls whether a patch 46 is applied by a patch applicator 105. For each product, the PLC 103 determines the action of the patch applicator 105, the patch reject conveyor 107, and the product reject conveyor 109. For each product presented to a patch applicator 105, the PLC 103 issues one of the following commands to the patch applicator 105 and patch cutter: (1) apply patch; (2) cull patch; or (3) cull web.
The apply patch command is issued if no component part has been flagged as defective in the composite web 39 that is presented to the patch applicator 105 and the patch 46, itself, satisfies inspection parameters. When the apply patch command is issued, the vacuum anvil drum 42 remains relatively stationary while the composite web 39 having a deposited adhesive is forced by the patch applicator 105 against the patch 46. After the patch 46 is applied, the PLC awaits the arrival of the next patch attachment site or product pitch.
The cull patch command is issued if a patch 46a does not meet inspection parameters. Representative parameters can be seen in
The cull web command is issued if any component part of the composite web 39 is flagged as defective.
The PLC 103 may also contain a unit diagnostics program, which monitors parameters of the patch on the anvil to determine the health of the cutting knives and anvils. The unit diagnostics program involves the use of defined patch parameters measured by a vision inspection station and compared to expected values. Information that is gathered by the diagnostics program is stored and processed in a database. Where measured parameters are approaching acceptable limits, alerts are sent to the machine operator, indicating that potential problems are developing. The HMI may automatically present the Unit Diagnostics Screen for the operator to assess the situation. Furthermore, the HMI may provide graphics and charts to assist the operator by showing trend data, measured data, and comparable data. Thus, an operator is given advance notice of a problem so that any corrections can be made during the next machine downtime. Specifically, as the knives on the patch cutter age, the patches tend to skew. Furthermore, the deviation between subsequent patch cut lengths is another indicator that a knife blade may require replacement.
In an effort to prolong machine run-time between service and to reduce start-up rejects, an automatic anvil adjustment program may be provided. Such adjustment allows the anvil drum and knife roll to move relative to one another. Startup and shutdown rejects can result in rejections of many products. The movements are preferably in one millimeter increments over a five millimeter range. The adjustments are made as the machine is running to prevent wear on a single spot as well as to minimize buildup of cut web material on the anvil. In addition to the automatic adjustment, a manual override adjustment may be provided for troubleshooting.
If the unit diagnostics program detects a pair of patches that have parameters outside of acceptable limits, which is usually caused by a catastrophic failure of a knife or anvil, the machine operator is alerted and the HMI preferably automatically presents the Unit Diagnostics Screen for the operator to assess the situation. For every knife or anvil that fails, two patches will be affected. Therefore, if the anvil roller can accompany eight patches, twenty-five percent of the patches will fall out of acceptable limits. All patches that fall out of the acceptable limits are culled by way of the reject patch conveyor. All patches that fall within acceptable limits will continue to be placed on a composite web that is otherwise indicated as appropriate for receiving a patch. After being notified of the problem, the machine operator will observe the HMI to verify problem. In an attempt to correct the problem, the operator may try an electronic anvil shift, which, if successful, will allow the process to continue. If the electronic anvil shift does not correct the problem, the operator will request that the machine stop. To aid in repair or replacement of the failed knife or anvil, the cutter and anvil drum will stop in a position allowing easy access to the failed components. As a convenience and to enable more efficient repair of the failed components, a rapid change out (RCO) tool or kit could be provided, such as a set of hex wrenches. The operator changes the failed part and prepares the machine to restart. The routine for automatically clearing the anvil drum may then run, and the unit begins attaching patches to the composite web. The alarm that first alerted the operator of the problem is then reset, either automatically, or manually by the operator through the use of the HMI.
There may arise a situation where multiple anvils or knives appear to have failed. In this situation, the operator is alerted to the problem, but no patches are culled. Rather, a visual inspection station downstream from the patch applicator is examined to determine if there truly is a problem. If the problem is verified by the placement accuracy check, the operator shuts down the machine and proper maintenance is performed. If an examination of the placement accuracy inspection station does not confirm the purported problem, the unit diagnostics program may be suspended until it can be repaired.
Although the foregoing description involves the placement of an absorbent insert or patch onto a diaper chassis, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the apparatus and process could be used to avoid unnecessary waste in the application of any sort of patch to a moving web. Other examples of patches that may be placed are tape tab patches and reusable fasteners.
Referring now to
Automatic Cuff Folding Defect Correction
Referring now to
Referring now to
As the cuff webs 310 pass over the elastic roller guides 340, preferably two adhesive coated strands of elastic 320 are laid down on top of each of the cuff webs 310 just before folding.
Referring again to
As best shown on
Referring again to
Still referring to
1.1 Cuff Correction Systems
The cuff folding system 300 preferably has four cuff correction mode options, described below.
1.1.1 Basic Cuff Correction Mode
The Basic Cuff Correction mode does not utilize the vision system 310, optional tape applicator (not shown), or optional elastic correction rollers 350 (
1.1.2 Advanced Cuff Correction Mode
The Advanced Cuff Correction mode incorporates a fold correction sequence and an elastic mistrack sequence.
The fold correction sequence engages the plows 360, the elastic mistrack correction rollers 350, applies tape and the cuff infeed rate is increased to help in the correction of the fold problem. If the system is unable to correct itself after a predetermined period, such as after 5 attempts, a general machine fault can be raised.
The elastic mistrack correction rollers 350 (
This mode supports all faults and rejects.
1.1.3 Advanced (Elastic Correction Only) Cuff Correction Mode
The Advanced (Elastic Correction Only) Cuff Correction mode includes everything that comes with the Advanced Cuff Correction mode except for the tape applicator.
Without the tape applicator, the fold correction sequence is different while in this mode. If a fold correction is required, the plows 360 will be engaged (by moving plows 360 slidably between the position shown in dashed lines on
1.1.4 Disabled
All cuff correction system monitoring and corrective action will be disabled regardless of which option is installed.
2. Setup and adjustment
2.1 Cuff System Adjustments
2.1.1 Adhesive adjustments
As shown in
When properly positioned, the glue gun heads 330 preferably apply some downward pressure on the elastic strands 320 to deflect them slightly.
The cuff unit cross machine direction adjustment mechanism 352 can be used to adjust the cuff unit in the cross machine direction.
2.2 Elastic Roller Setup
Referring now to
2.3 Idler Roll Adjustments
The proper location for the cuff infeed and outfeed idler rolls are shown in
Referring to
Still referring to
Referring to
A feather arrest 358 consisting of a feather arrest block 362 and nut plate 361 is used to control buildup of process materials which results in product reject or process shut-down. The width of the feather arrest is preferably roughly the same as the folding board or plate 380 and, the feather arrest block 362 mounts to the underside of it by nut plate 361. The feather arrest block 362 has a sloped surface which rises slightly above the plane of the folding plate 380, this causes the cuff web 310 to contact the tip of the feather arrest block 362 (somewhat like a scraper) as it exits the cuff folding assembly. This action minimizes buildup. The feather arrest block 362 preferably has a mirrored shape which allows it to be used a total of four times before needing replacement. The cuff web 310 preferably makes contact with an outboard edges of the feather arrest blocks 362, this allows them to be swapped out between operator and drive side folding boards 380. The mirrored shape of the feather arrest block 362 allows it to be rotated 180° and remounted providing an additional use out of each feather arrest.
3. Operation
3.1 Fold Inspection
If the fold of the non-woven web 310 becomes too narrow or the web width is out of spec on either the drive side or the operator side independently, the fold correction sequence is initiated. The fold correction sequence can be disabled if machine speed is below a predetermined speed, such as 150 ppm, and momentarily when a splice has been detected.
3.2 Fold Correction Sequence
In the fold correction sequence, the plows 360 are engaged, and the elastic mistrack correction rollers 350 are engaged momentarily and the cuff infeed rate is increased to help in the correction of the fold problem. After a brief delay to allow everything to become fully engaged, tape can be applied to the web (not shown) to further assist correcting the fold defect. Should the vision system 370 detect that cuff problems no longer exist during the brief delay, the fold correction sequence is aborted and tape is not applied to the web. Once tape has been applied to the web, the system will wait long enough to evaluate whether the problem still exists, again via vision system 370. If the problem no longer exists, the plows 360 are disengaged, the correction attempts counter is reset, and the cuff infeed 305 is returned to its normal rate. If the problem still exists, the above procedure can be repeated, such as to a preset limit of up to a total of 5 attempts. Then, if desired, if the system is unable to correct itself after 5 attempts, a general machine fault is raised.
3.3 Elastic Inspection
If the inner elastic strand is missing or the fold becomes too wide on either the drive side or the operator side independently, the elastic mistrack correction sequence can be initiated. The elastic mistrack correction sequence is preferably disabled if the system is in the fold correction sequence, if the machine is not at speed set point, or momentarily when a splice has been detected.
3.4 Elastic Mistrack Correction Sequence
In the elastic mistrack correction sequence, the elastic correction rollers 350 are engaged momentarily and the cuff infeed rate is increased to help in the correction of the elastic mistrack. Once the rollers 350 are disengaged, the system will wait long enough to evaluate whether the problem still exists. If the problem no longer exists, an elastic mistrack correction attempts counter is reset and the cuff infeed 305 is returned to its normal rate. If the problem still exists, the above procedure can be repeated a predetermined number of times, such as up to a total of 5 attempts. If the system is unable to correct itself after the predetermined number of attempts, a general machine fault can be raised.
3.5 Process Response
3.5.1 Glue Gun
Intermittent glue is enabled any time speed is above a predetermined speed, such as 100 ppm.
3.5.2 Plows
Plows 360 are engaged when a splice is detected for a set number of products to allow the splice to pass. This action is part of the Advanced Cuff Correction Mode, Advanced (Elastic Correction Only) Cuff Correction Mode, and the Basic Cuff Correction Mode described previously. In addition, the plows 360 engage during the fold correction sequence.
3.5.3 Tape Applicator
Tape can be applied to the web during the fold correction sequence.
3.5.4 Elastic Mistrack Correction Rollers
Elastic mistrack correction rollers 350 are engaged during the elastic mistrack correction sequence. Elastic mistrack correction rollers 350 are engaged at the beginning of each fold correction sequence. Elastic mistrack correction rollers 350 are engaged whenever machine speed is not at set point with two exceptions. First, if the cameras 372 detect a need to run the fold correction sequence, the command to engage the elastic mistrack correction rollers 350 when machine speed is not at set point is disabled. This allows the fold correction sequence to run like normal. Second, the elastic mistrack correction rollers 350 will not engage during ramp-down even though the machine speed is not at set point during this time.
3.5.5 Reduced Tension (Increased Infeed Rate)
Under four different scenarios, the cuff infeed rate is increased by a predetermined amount, such as 0.75 mm, to reduce tension. First, if the splicer sequence activates at the unwind of the cuff webs 310, the cuff infeed rate is increased until the splice has passed the folding boards 380. Second, whenever machine speed is not at set point, the cuff infeed rate is increased to help maintain the cuff fold. Third, if the system ever enters the fold correction sequence, the cuff infeed rate is increased to help in the correction of the fold. Last, if the system ever enters the elastic mistrack correction sequence, the cuff infeed rate is increased to help in the correction of the elastic mistrack.
3.5.6 Ramp-Up Notes
The elastic mistrack correction rollers 350 are engaged during ramp-up because the machine speed is not at set point. The fold correction sequence will take place if the need arises once machine speed equals or exceeds a predetermined amount, such as 150 ppm. If a fold correction sequence occurs, the command to enable the elastic mistrack correction rollers when the machine speed is not at set point is momentarily disabled. The elastic mistrack correction sequence is disabled during ramp-up, and the cuff infeed rate is increased to help maintain the cuff fold.
3.5.7 Ramp-Down Notes
The fold correction sequence will take place during ramp-down if the need arises and the machine speed still exceeds a predetermined amount, such 150 ppm. The elastic mistrack correction sequence is disabled during ramp-down.
3.5.8 Splice Notes
When a splice in one of the incoming cuff webs 310 is detected, the plows 360 engage and the fold correction sequence and the elastic mistrack correction sequence are disabled. The plows 360 remain engaged for a product count long enough to allow the splice to pass through the plows and pass the vision system. Once the product count has been met, the plows 360 will disengage and the fold correction sequence and the elastic mistrack correction system will be enabled. When the splicer sequence activates at the unwind, the cuff infeed rate is increased until the splice has passed the folding boards.
3.6 Faults
The Advanced Cuff Correction System and the Advanced (Elastic Correction Only) Cuff Correction System can raise 4 different general machine faults. If the drive side camera 372 OK status signal is not present, a cuff vision system drive side camera fault is raised. If the operator side camera 372 OK status signal is not present, a cuff vision system operator side camera fault is raised. If the fold correction sequence fails to fix a detected problem in a predetermined number of attempts, it will raise an unable to correct cuff fold fault. If the elastic mistrack correction sequence fails to fix a detected problem in a predetermined number of attempts, it will raise an unable to correct cuff elastic/glue fault. Glue is noted in this fault description because a lack of glue on the elastic strands 320 will cause the camera 372 to be unable to detect it.
3.7 Rejects
Rejects are caused any time the system enters the fold correction sequence or the elastic mistrack correction sequence until problems are no longer detected. Due to the nature of the vision system 372, rejects from the cuff vision system have a speed dependency and need to have the offsets and quantities set at the desired running speed. There are 8 different reject reasons caused by the Advanced Cuff Correction System and the Advanced (Elastic Correction Only) Cuff Correction System. These are drive side web width out of spec, drive side fold too narrow, drive side fold too wide, drive side inner elastic strand missing, operator side web width out of spec, operator side fold too narrow, operator side fold too wide, and operator side inner elastic strand missing.
4. Troubleshooting
4.1 Cuff Problems Possible Causes:
The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
135145 | Murphy | Jan 1873 | A |
293353 | Purvis | Feb 1884 | A |
312257 | Cotton et al. | Feb 1885 | A |
410123 | Stilwell | Aug 1889 | A |
432742 | Stanley | Jul 1890 | A |
643821 | Howlett | Feb 1900 | A |
1393524 | Grupe | Oct 1921 | A |
1431315 | Le Moine | Oct 1922 | A |
1605842 | Jones | Nov 1926 | A |
1629681 | Cram | May 1927 | A |
1686595 | Belluche | Oct 1928 | A |
1957651 | Joa | May 1934 | A |
2009857 | Potdevin | Jul 1935 | A |
2054832 | Potdevin | Sep 1936 | A |
2117432 | Linscott | May 1938 | A |
2128746 | Joa | Aug 1938 | A |
2131808 | Joa | Oct 1938 | A |
2164408 | Joa | Jul 1939 | A |
2167179 | Joa | Jul 1939 | A |
2171741 | Cohn et al. | Sep 1939 | A |
2213431 | Joa | Sep 1940 | A |
2254290 | Joa | Sep 1941 | A |
2254291 | Joa | Sep 1941 | A |
2282477 | Joa | May 1942 | A |
2286096 | Joa | Jun 1942 | A |
2296931 | Joa | Sep 1942 | A |
2304571 | Joa | Dec 1942 | A |
2324930 | Joa | Jul 1943 | A |
2345937 | Joa | Apr 1944 | A |
2466240 | Joa | Apr 1949 | A |
2481929 | Joa | Sep 1949 | A |
2510229 | Joa | Jun 1950 | A |
2540844 | Strauss | Feb 1951 | A |
2584002 | Elser et al. | Jan 1952 | A |
2591359 | Joa | Apr 1952 | A |
2618816 | Joa | Nov 1952 | A |
2627859 | Hargrave | Feb 1953 | A |
2695025 | Andrews | Nov 1954 | A |
2702406 | Reed | Feb 1955 | A |
2721554 | Joa | Oct 1955 | A |
2730144 | Joa | Jan 1956 | A |
2772611 | Heywood | Dec 1956 | A |
2780253 | Joa | Feb 1957 | A |
2785609 | Billeb | Mar 1957 | A |
2788786 | Dexter | Apr 1957 | A |
2811905 | Kennedy, Jr. | Nov 1957 | A |
2828745 | Deutz | Apr 1958 | A |
2839059 | Joa | Jun 1958 | A |
2842169 | Joa | Jul 1958 | A |
2851934 | Heywood | Sep 1958 | A |
2875724 | Joa | Mar 1959 | A |
2890700 | Lonberg-Holm | Jun 1959 | A |
2913862 | Sabee | Nov 1959 | A |
2939461 | Joa | Jun 1960 | A |
2939646 | Stone | Jun 1960 | A |
2960143 | Joa | Nov 1960 | A |
2990081 | De Neui et al. | Jun 1961 | A |
2991739 | Joa | Jul 1961 | A |
3016207 | Comstock, III | Jan 1962 | A |
3016582 | Joa | Jan 1962 | A |
3017795 | Joa | Jan 1962 | A |
3020687 | Joa | Feb 1962 | A |
3021135 | Joa | Feb 1962 | A |
3024957 | Pinto | Mar 1962 | A |
3053427 | Wasserman | Sep 1962 | A |
3054516 | Joa | Sep 1962 | A |
3069982 | Heywood et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3086253 | Joa | Apr 1963 | A |
3087689 | Heim | Apr 1963 | A |
3089494 | Schwartz | May 1963 | A |
3091408 | Schoeneman | May 1963 | A |
3114994 | Joa | Dec 1963 | A |
3122293 | Joa | Feb 1964 | A |
3128206 | Dungler | Apr 1964 | A |
3203419 | Joa | Aug 1965 | A |
3230955 | Joa | Jan 1966 | A |
3268954 | Joa | Aug 1966 | A |
3288037 | Burnett | Nov 1966 | A |
3289254 | Joa | Dec 1966 | A |
3291131 | Joa | Dec 1966 | A |
3301114 | Joa | Jan 1967 | A |
3318608 | Smrekar | May 1967 | A |
3322589 | Joa | May 1967 | A |
3342184 | Joa | Sep 1967 | A |
3356092 | Joa | Dec 1967 | A |
3360103 | Joa | Dec 1967 | A |
3363847 | Joa | Jan 1968 | A |
3391777 | Joa | Jul 1968 | A |
3454442 | Heller, Jr. | Jul 1969 | A |
3463413 | Smith | Aug 1969 | A |
3470848 | Dreher | Oct 1969 | A |
3484275 | Lewicki, Jr. | Dec 1969 | A |
3502322 | Cran | Mar 1970 | A |
3521639 | Joa | Jul 1970 | A |
3526563 | Schott, Jr. | Sep 1970 | A |
3538551 | Joa | Nov 1970 | A |
3540641 | Besnyo | Nov 1970 | A |
3575170 | Clark | Apr 1971 | A |
3607578 | Berg et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3635462 | Joa | Jan 1972 | A |
3656741 | Macke et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3666611 | Joa | May 1972 | A |
3673021 | Joa | Jun 1972 | A |
3685818 | Burger et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3728191 | Wierzba et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3751224 | Wackerle | Aug 1973 | A |
3758102 | Munn et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3772120 | Radzins | Nov 1973 | A |
3776798 | Milano | Dec 1973 | A |
3796360 | Alexeff | Mar 1974 | A |
3811987 | Wilkinson et al. | May 1974 | A |
3816210 | Aoko et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3847710 | Blomqvist et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3854917 | McKinney et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3883389 | Schott, Jr. | May 1975 | A |
3888400 | Wiig | Jun 1975 | A |
3901238 | Gellert et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3903768 | Amberg et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3904147 | Taitel et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3918968 | Coast | Nov 1975 | A |
3960646 | Wiedamann | Jun 1976 | A |
3988194 | Babcock et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3991994 | Farish | Nov 1976 | A |
4002005 | Mueller et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4003298 | Schott, Jr. | Jan 1977 | A |
4009814 | Singh | Mar 1977 | A |
4009815 | Ericson et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4053150 | Lane | Oct 1977 | A |
4056919 | Hirsch | Nov 1977 | A |
4081301 | Buell | Mar 1978 | A |
4090516 | Schaar | May 1978 | A |
4094319 | Joa | Jun 1978 | A |
4103595 | Corse | Aug 1978 | A |
4106974 | Hirsch | Aug 1978 | A |
4108584 | Radzins et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4136535 | Audas | Jan 1979 | A |
4141193 | Joa | Feb 1979 | A |
4141509 | Radzins | Feb 1979 | A |
4142626 | Bradley | Mar 1979 | A |
4157934 | Ryan et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4165666 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4168776 | Hoeboer | Sep 1979 | A |
4171239 | Hirsch et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4205679 | Repke et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4208230 | Magarian | Jun 1980 | A |
4213356 | Armitage | Jul 1980 | A |
4215827 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4222533 | Pongracz | Sep 1980 | A |
4223822 | Clitheroe | Sep 1980 | A |
4231129 | Winch | Nov 1980 | A |
4236955 | Prittie | Dec 1980 | A |
4275510 | George | Jun 1981 | A |
4284454 | Joa | Aug 1981 | A |
4307800 | Joa | Dec 1981 | A |
4316756 | Wilson | Feb 1982 | A |
4325519 | McLean | Apr 1982 | A |
4342206 | Rommel | Aug 1982 | A |
4364787 | Radzins | Dec 1982 | A |
4374576 | Ryan | Feb 1983 | A |
4379008 | Gross et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4394898 | Campbell | Jul 1983 | A |
4411721 | Wishart | Oct 1983 | A |
4452597 | Achelpohl | Jun 1984 | A |
4492608 | Hirsch et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4501098 | Gregory | Feb 1985 | A |
4508528 | Hirsch et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4522853 | Szonn et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4543152 | Nozaka | Sep 1985 | A |
4551191 | Kock et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4578052 | Engel et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4586199 | Birring | May 1986 | A |
4589945 | Polit | May 1986 | A |
4603800 | Focke et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608115 | Schroth et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4610097 | Kotitschke et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4610681 | Strohbeen et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4610682 | Kopp | Sep 1986 | A |
4614076 | Rathemacher | Sep 1986 | A |
4619357 | Radzins et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4634482 | Lammers | Jan 1987 | A |
4641381 | Heran et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4642150 | Stemmler | Feb 1987 | A |
4642839 | Urban | Feb 1987 | A |
4650406 | Peters | Mar 1987 | A |
4650530 | Mahoney et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4663220 | Wisneski et al. | May 1987 | A |
4672705 | Bors et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4675016 | Meuli et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4675062 | Instance | Jun 1987 | A |
4675068 | Lundmark | Jun 1987 | A |
4686136 | Homonoff et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693056 | Raszewski | Sep 1987 | A |
4699606 | Whitley et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4701239 | Craig | Oct 1987 | A |
4720415 | Vander Wielen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4723698 | Schoonderbeek | Feb 1988 | A |
4726874 | Van Vliet | Feb 1988 | A |
4726876 | Tomsovic, Jr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743241 | Igaue et al. | May 1988 | A |
4751997 | Hirsch | Jun 1988 | A |
4753429 | Irvine et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756141 | Hirsch et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763822 | Mohrsen | Aug 1988 | A |
4764325 | Angstadt | Aug 1988 | A |
4765780 | Angstadt | Aug 1988 | A |
4776920 | Ryan | Oct 1988 | A |
4777513 | Nelson | Oct 1988 | A |
4782647 | Williams et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4785986 | Daane et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4795416 | Cogswell et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4795451 | Buckley | Jan 1989 | A |
4795510 | Wittrock et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4798353 | Peugh | Jan 1989 | A |
4801345 | Dussaud et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802570 | Hirsch et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4840609 | Jones et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4845964 | Bors et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4864802 | D'Angelo | Sep 1989 | A |
4880102 | Indrebo | Nov 1989 | A |
4888231 | Angstadt | Dec 1989 | A |
4892536 | Des Marais et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4904440 | Angstadt | Feb 1990 | A |
4908175 | Angstadt | Mar 1990 | A |
4909019 | Delacretaz et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4915767 | Rajala et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917746 | Kons | Apr 1990 | A |
4925520 | Beaudoin et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927322 | Schweizer et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927486 | Fattal et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927582 | Bryson | May 1990 | A |
4937887 | Schreiner | Jul 1990 | A |
4963072 | Miley et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4987940 | Straub et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4994010 | Doderer-Winkler | Feb 1991 | A |
5000806 | Merkatoris et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5021111 | Swenson | Jun 1991 | A |
5025910 | Lasure et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5045039 | Bay | Sep 1991 | A |
5062597 | Martin et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5064179 | Martin | Nov 1991 | A |
5064492 | Friesch | Nov 1991 | A |
5080741 | Nomura et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5094658 | Smithe et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5096532 | Neuwirth et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108017 | Adamski, Jr. et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109767 | Nyfeler et al. | May 1992 | A |
5110403 | Ehlert | May 1992 | A |
5114392 | McAdam, III et al. | May 1992 | A |
5127981 | Straub et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131525 | Musschoot | Jul 1992 | A |
5131901 | Moll | Jul 1992 | A |
5133511 | Mack | Jul 1992 | A |
5137505 | Ishii et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5147487 | Nomura et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5163594 | Meyer | Nov 1992 | A |
5171239 | Igaue et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176244 | Radzins et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178601 | Lovenbrant | Jan 1993 | A |
5183252 | Wolber et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188627 | Igaue et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190234 | Ezekiel | Mar 1993 | A |
5195684 | Radzins | Mar 1993 | A |
5203043 | Riedel | Apr 1993 | A |
5212656 | Clary | May 1993 | A |
5213645 | Nomura et al. | May 1993 | A |
5222422 | Benner, Jr. et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223069 | Tokuno et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226992 | Morman | Jul 1993 | A |
5246433 | Hasse et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252228 | Stokes | Oct 1993 | A |
5267933 | Precoma | Dec 1993 | A |
5273228 | Yoshida | Dec 1993 | A |
5275676 | Rooyakkers et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5308345 | Herrin | May 1994 | A |
5328438 | Crowley | Jul 1994 | A |
5340424 | Matsushita | Aug 1994 | A |
5368893 | Sommer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5389173 | Merkatoris et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5393360 | Bridges et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5407507 | Ball | Apr 1995 | A |
5407513 | Hayden et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415649 | Watanabe et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421924 | Ziegelhoffer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424025 | Hanschen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429576 | Doderer-Winkler | Jul 1995 | A |
5435802 | Kober | Jul 1995 | A |
5443437 | Mack | Aug 1995 | A |
5449353 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5464401 | Hasse et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5486253 | Otruba | Jan 1996 | A |
5494622 | Heath et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500075 | Herrmann | Mar 1996 | A |
5516392 | Bridges et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518566 | Bridges et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525175 | Blenke et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531850 | Herrmann | Jul 1996 | A |
5540647 | Weiermann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545275 | Herrin et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545285 | Johnson | Aug 1996 | A |
5552013 | Ehlert et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556360 | Kober et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556504 | Rajala et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560793 | Ruscher et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575187 | Dieterlen | Nov 1996 | A |
5586964 | Chase | Dec 1996 | A |
5602747 | Rajala | Feb 1997 | A |
5603794 | Thomas | Feb 1997 | A |
5616113 | Van Den Bergh | Apr 1997 | A |
5624420 | Bridges et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624428 | Sauer | Apr 1997 | A |
5628738 | Suekane | May 1997 | A |
5634917 | Fujioka et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643165 | Klekamp | Jul 1997 | A |
5643396 | Rajala et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645543 | Nomura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659229 | Rajala | Aug 1997 | A |
5660657 | Rajala et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660665 | Jalonen | Aug 1997 | A |
5683376 | Kato et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683531 | Roessler et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
RE35687 | Igaue et al. | Dec 1997 | E |
5693165 | Schmitz | Dec 1997 | A |
5699653 | Hartman | Dec 1997 | A |
5705013 | Nease | Jan 1998 | A |
5707470 | Rajala et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711832 | Glaug et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716311 | Novick et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725518 | Coates | Mar 1998 | A |
5725714 | Fujioka | Mar 1998 | A |
5743994 | Roessler et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745922 | Rajala et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746869 | Hayden et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749989 | Linman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766389 | Brandon et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788797 | Herrin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817199 | Brennecke et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829164 | Kotitschke | Nov 1998 | A |
5836931 | Toyoda et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858012 | Yamaki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865393 | Kreft et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868727 | Barr et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876027 | Fukui et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5876792 | Caldwell | Mar 1999 | A |
5879500 | Herrin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902222 | Wessman | May 1999 | A |
5902431 | Wilkinson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5932039 | Popp et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938193 | Bluemle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964390 | Borresen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964970 | Woolwine et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6022443 | Rajala et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024682 | Mandel et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036805 | McNichols | Mar 2000 | A |
6043836 | Kerr et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050517 | Dobrescu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074110 | Verlinden et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076442 | Arterburn et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098249 | Toney et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123792 | Samida et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138436 | Malin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6171432 | Brisebois | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183576 | Couillard et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195850 | Melbye | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6196147 | Burton et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210386 | Inoue | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212859 | Bielik, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214147 | Mortellite et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6250048 | Linkiewicz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264784 | Menard et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276421 | Valenti et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276586 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276587 | Borresen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284081 | Vogt et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287409 | Stephany | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306122 | Narawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309336 | Muessig et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312420 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314333 | Rajala et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315022 | Herrin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319347 | Rajala | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336921 | Kato et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358350 | Glaug et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369291 | Uchimoto et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375769 | Quereshi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391013 | Suzuki et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6416697 | Venturino et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431038 | Couturier | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440246 | Vogt et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443389 | Palone | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446795 | Allen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473669 | Rajala et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475325 | Parrish et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478786 | Glaug et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482278 | McCabe et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494244 | Parrish et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6514233 | Glaug | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521320 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523595 | Milner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524423 | Hilt et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526733 | Schellenberg | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533879 | Quereshi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540857 | Coenen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547909 | Butterworth | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551228 | Richards | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551430 | Glaug et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554815 | Umebayashi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557466 | Codde et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569275 | Popp et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572520 | Blumle | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581517 | Becker et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585841 | Popp et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589149 | VanEperen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6596107 | Stopher | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596108 | McCabe | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605172 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605173 | Glaug et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6637583 | Andersson | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648122 | Hirsch et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6649010 | Parrish et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651923 | Kinnunen et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656309 | Parker et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6659150 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6659991 | Suckane | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675552 | Kunz et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684925 | Nagate et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722494 | Nakakado | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730189 | Franzmann | May 2004 | B1 |
6743324 | Hargett et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750466 | Guha et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758109 | Nakakado | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766817 | da Silva | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6808582 | Popp et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
D497991 | Otsubo et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
6814217 | Blumenthal et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820671 | Calvert | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837840 | Yonekawa et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840616 | Summers | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852186 | Matsuda et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6875202 | Kumasaka et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893528 | Middelstadt et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6913664 | Umebayashi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6913718 | Ducker | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918404 | Dias da Silva | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6942759 | Mohrsen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946059 | Mohrsen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6976521 | Mlinar | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978486 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7017820 | Brunner | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7045031 | Popp et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066586 | da Silva | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077393 | Ishida | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7130710 | Popp et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144356 | Harnish | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7172666 | Groves et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195684 | Satoh | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201345 | Werner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214174 | Allen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7214287 | Shiomi | May 2007 | B2 |
7247219 | O'Dowd | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7303708 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7380213 | Pokorny et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7398870 | McCabe | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7449084 | Nakakado | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7452436 | Andrews | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7500941 | Coe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7533709 | Meyer | May 2009 | B2 |
7537215 | Beaudoin et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7569007 | Thoma | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587966 | Nakakado et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618513 | Meyer | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7638014 | Coose et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640962 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7703599 | Meyer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708849 | McCabe | May 2010 | B2 |
7770712 | McCabe | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771407 | Umebayashi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780052 | McCabe | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809179 | Singh et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811403 | Andrews | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861756 | Jenquin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871400 | Sablone et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7909956 | Coose et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7975584 | McCabe | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987964 | McCabe | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007484 | McCabe et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007623 | Andrews | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011493 | Giuliani et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8016972 | Andrews et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8257535 | Yamamoto | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273003 | Umebayashi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
9387131 | Andrews | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010012813 | Bluemle | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010017181 | Otruba et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020046802 | Tachibana et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059013 | Rajala et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020084568 | Codde et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096241 | Instance | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020125105 | Nakakado | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020162776 | Hergeth | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030000620 | Herrin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030015209 | Gingras et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030051802 | Hargett et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052148 | Rajala et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066585 | McCabe | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083638 | Molee | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084984 | Glaug et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030089447 | Molee et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121614 | Tabor et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135189 | Umebayashi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040007328 | Popp et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040016500 | Tachibana et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044325 | Corneliusson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040087425 | Ng et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112517 | Groves et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040164482 | Edinger | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040182497 | Lowrey | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050000628 | Norrby | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022476 | Hamer | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050026760 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050077418 | Werner et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050139713 | Weber et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050196538 | Sommer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230056 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230449 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233881 | Meyer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234412 | Andrews et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050257881 | Coose et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050275148 | Beaudoin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021300 | Tada et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060137298 | Oshita et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060199718 | Thoma | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217253 | Thoma | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224137 | McCabe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265867 | Schaap | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070045461 | Sartain et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074953 | McCabe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070238596 | Terhaag et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080223537 | Wiedmann | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090020211 | Andrews et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100078119 | Yamamoto | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100078120 | Otsubo | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100078127 | Yamamoto | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100168708 | Umebayashi | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193138 | Eckstein | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100193155 | Nakatani | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1007854 | Nov 1995 | BE |
1146129 | May 1983 | CA |
1153345 | Sep 1983 | CA |
1190078 | Jul 1985 | CA |
1210744 | Sep 1986 | CA |
1212132 | Sep 1986 | CA |
1236056 | May 1988 | CA |
1249102 | Jan 1989 | CA |
1292201 | Nov 1991 | CA |
1307244 | Sep 1992 | CA |
1308015 | Sep 1992 | CA |
1310342 | Nov 1992 | CA |
2023816 | Mar 1994 | CA |
2404154 | Oct 2001 | CA |
2541194 | Oct 2006 | CA |
2559517 | Apr 2007 | CA |
2337700 | Aug 2008 | CA |
2407867 | Jun 2010 | CA |
60123502 | Oct 2006 | DE |
60216550 | Dec 2006 | DE |
102005048868 | Apr 2007 | DE |
102006047280 | Apr 2007 | DE |
0044206 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0048011 | Mar 1982 | EP |
0089106 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0099732 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0206208 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0304140 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0439897 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0455231 | Nov 1991 | EP |
510251 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0652175 | May 1995 | EP |
0811473 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0901780 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0990588 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1132325 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1199057 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1272347 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1366734 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1504738 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1571249 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1619008 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1707168 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1726414 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1302424 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1801045 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1941853 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2233116 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2238955 | Oct 2010 | EP |
509706 | Nov 1982 | ES |
520559 | Dec 1983 | ES |
296211 | Dec 1987 | ES |
200601373 | Jul 2009 | ES |
2311349 | Sep 2009 | ES |
2177355 | Nov 1973 | FR |
2255961 | Jul 1975 | FR |
1132325 | Oct 2006 | FR |
2891811 | Apr 2007 | FR |
191101501 | Jan 1912 | GB |
439897 | Dec 1935 | GB |
856389 | Dec 1960 | GB |
941073 | Nov 1963 | GB |
1096373 | Dec 1967 | GB |
1126539 | Sep 1968 | GB |
1346329 | Feb 1974 | GB |
1412812 | Nov 1975 | GB |
2045298 | Oct 1980 | GB |
2115775 | Sep 1983 | GB |
2288316 | Oct 1995 | GB |
1374910 | May 2010 | IT |
1374911 | May 2010 | IT |
428364 | Jan 1992 | JP |
542180 | Feb 1993 | JP |
576566 | Mar 1993 | JP |
626160 | Feb 1994 | JP |
626161 | Feb 1994 | JP |
6197925 | Jul 1994 | JP |
9299398 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10035621 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-277091 | Oct 1998 | JP |
0602047 | May 2007 | SE |
0601003-7 | Jun 2007 | SE |
0601145-6 | Oct 2009 | SE |
WO9403301 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO9732552 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9747265 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9747810 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9821134 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9907319 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO9913813 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9932385 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9965437 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO2007029115 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0143682 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0172237 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO2004007329 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2005075163 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2007039800 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007126347 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008001209 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008155618 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2011 regarding EP Application No. 11250672.0, 4 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Jul. 23, 2009, 14 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Mar. 10, 2010, 11 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Nov. 9, 2010, 14 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Jun. 23, 2011, 10 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Jan. 5, 2012, 8 pages. |
“Reciprocating Mechanisms”, Franklin Jones, vol. 1, date unknown, 2 pages. |
European Search Report regarding Application No. EP11250709, dated Oct. 17, 2014, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13196663 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 16365308 | US |