The invention disclosed herein relates to apparatus and methods for waste reduction and improvements to the quality and production in web processing operations, such as diaper manufacturing. While the description provided relates to diaper manufacturing, the apparatus and method are easily adaptable to other applications.
Generally, diapers comprise an absorbent insert or patch and a chassis, which, when the diaper is worn, supports the insert proximate a wearer's body. Additionally, diapers may include other various patches, such as tape tab patches, reusable fasteners and the like. The raw materials used in forming a representative insert are typically cellulose pulp, tissue paper, poly, nonwoven web, acquisition, and elastic, although application specific materials are sometimes utilized. Usually, most of the insert raw materials are provided in roll form, and unwound and applied in assembly line fashion.
In the creation of a diaper, multiple roll-fed web processes are typically utilized. To create an absorbent insert, the cellulose pulp is unwound from the provided raw material roll and pulverized by a pulp mill. Discrete pulp cores are formed by a core forming assembly and placed on a continuous tissue web. Optionally, super-absorbent powder may be added to the pulp core. The tissue web is wrapped around the pulp core. The wrapped core is debulked by proceeding through a calender unit, which at least partially compresses the core, thereby increasing its density and structural integrity. After debulking, the tissue-wrapped core is passed through a segregation or knife unit, where individual wrapped cores are cut. The cut cores are conveyed, at the proper pitch, or spacing, to a boundary compression unit.
While the insert cores are being formed, other insert components are being prepared to be presented to the boundary compression unit. For instance, the poly sheet is prepared to receive a cut core. Like the cellulose pulp, poly sheet material is usually provided in roll form. The poly sheet is fed through a splicer and accumulator, coated with an adhesive in a predetermined pattern, and then presented to the boundary compression unit. In addition to the poly sheet, which may form the bottom of the insert, a two-ply top sheet may also be formed in parallel to the core formation. Representative plies are an acquisition web material and a nonwoven web material, both of which are fed from material rolls, through a splicer and accumulator. The plies are coated with adhesive, adhered together, cut to size, and presented to the boundary compression unit. Therefore, at the boundary compression unit, three components are provided for assembly: the poly bottom sheet, the core, and the two-ply top sheet.
A representative boundary compression unit includes a die roller and a platen roller. When all three insert components are provided to the boundary compression unit, the nip of the rollers properly compresses the boundary of the insert. Thus, provided at the output of the boundary compression unit is a string of interconnected diaper inserts. The diaper inserts are then separated by an insert knife assembly and properly oriented. At this point, the completed insert is ready for placement on a diaper chassis.
A representative diaper chassis comprises nonwoven web material and support structure. The diaper support structure is generally elastic and may include leg elastic, waistband elastic and belly band elastic. The support structure is usually sandwiched between layers of the nonwoven web material, which is fed from material rolls, through splicers and accumulators.
The present invention relates to disposable hygiene products and to methods and apparatuses for processing components of disposable hygiene products. More specifically, the invention relates to manufacturing a stretchable breathable laminate that is bonded at a plurality of bond sites.
Elastic laminates can be formed of a layer of stretched elastic between two non-stretched layers of non-woven material. Once the stretched elastic layer is bonded with the non-stretched non-woven, a stretch engine is formed once the elastic material is allowed to relax, forming a laminate that can be stretched in the machine direction.
During construction of such laminates, defects in the elastic material supplied to the process can result in snapped or otherwise unacceptable elastic introduced to the system. If such unacceptable elastic is introduced into the laminate, the manufacturing process can require slowing or stoppage in order for properly produced laminate to be re-introduced into the process. One aspect of the present invention relates to an automated method and apparatus to first detect such defects, and to automatically re-thread the elastic material through stretch rollers and continue with the processing sequence using acceptable elastic material resulting in an acceptable formed laminate.
Such automation results in less manual threading and re-threading, and less system downtime and scrapped product (resulting from unacceptable elastic forming unacceptable laminate).
The chassis may also be provided with several patches, besides the absorbent insert. Representative patches include adhesive tape tabs and resealable closures.
The process utilizes two main carrier webs; a nonwoven web which forms an inner liner web, and an outer web that forms an outwardly facing layer in the finished diaper. In a representative chassis process, the nonwoven web is slit at a slitter station by rotary knives along three lines, thereby forming four webs. One of the lines is on approximately the centerline of the web and the other two lines are parallel to and spaced a short distance from the centerline. The effect of such slicing is twofold; first, to separate the nonwoven web into two inner diaper liners. One liner will become the inside of the front of the diaper, and the second liner will become the inside of the back of that garment. Second, two separate, relatively narrow strips are formed that may be subsequently used to cover and entrap portions of the leg-hole elastics. The strips can be separated physically by an angularly disposed spreader roll and aligned laterally with their downstream target positions on the inner edges of the formed liners.
After the nonwoven web is sliced, an adhesive is applied to the liners in a predetermined pattern in preparation to receive leg-hole elastic. The leg-hole elastic is applied to the liners and then covered with the narrow strips previously separated from the nonwoven web. Adhesive is applied to the outer web, which is then combined with the assembled inner webs having elastic thereon, thereby forming the diaper chassis. Next, after the elastic members have been sandwiched between the inner and outer webs, an adhesive is applied to the chassis. The chassis is now ready to receive an insert.
To assemble the final diaper product, the insert must be combined with the chassis. The placement of the insert onto the chassis occurs on a placement drum or at a patch applicator. The inserts are provided to the chassis on the placement drum at a desired pitch or spacing. The generally flat chassis/insert combination is then folded so that the inner webs face each other, and the combination is trimmed. A sealer bonds the webs at appropriate locations prior to individual diapers being cut from the folded and sealed webs.
Roll-fed web processes typically use splicers and accumulators to assist in providing continuous webs during web processing operations. A first web is fed from a supply wheel (the expiring roll) into the manufacturing process. As the material from the expiring roll is depleted, it is necessary to splice the leading edge of a second web from a standby roll to the first web on the expiring roll in a manner that will not cause interruption of the web supply to a web consuming or utilizing device.
In a splicing system, a web accumulation dancer system may be employed, in which an accumulator collects a substantial length of the first web. By using an accumulator, the material being fed into the process can continue, yet the trailing end of the material can be stopped or slowed for a short time interval so that it can be spliced to leading edge of the new supply roll. The leading portion of the expiring roll remains supplied continuously to the web-utilizing device. The accumulator continues to feed the web utilization process while the expiring roll is stopped and the new web on a standby roll can be spliced to the end of the expiring roll.
In this manner, the device has a constant web supply being paid out from the accumulator, while the stopped web material in the accumulator can be spliced to the standby roll. Examples of web accumulators include that disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/110,616, which is commonly owned by the assignee of the present application, and incorporated herein by reference.
As in many manufacturing operations, waste minimization is a goal in web processing applications, as products having spliced raw materials cannot be sold to consumers. Indeed, due to the rate at which web processing machines run, even minimal waste can cause inefficiencies of scale. In present systems, waste materials are recycled. However, the act of harvesting recyclable materials from defective product is intensive. That is, recyclable materials are harvested only after an identification of a reject product at or near the end of a process. The result is that recyclable materials are commingled, and harvesting requires the extra step of separating waste components. Therefore, the art of web processing would benefit from systems and methods that identify potentially defective product prior to product assembly, thereby eliminating effort during recyclable material harvesting.
Furthermore, to improve quality and production levels by eliminating some potentially defective product, the art of web processing would benefit from systems and methods that ensure higher product yield and less machine downtime.
Provided are method and apparatus for minimizing waste and improving quality and production in web processing operations.
Importantly, the methods taught in the present application are applicable not only to diapers and the like, but in any web based operation. The waste minimization techniques taught herein can be directed any discrete component of a manufactured article, i.e., the methods taught herein are not product specific. For instance, the present methods can be applied as easily with respect to diaper components as they can for feminine hygiene products, as they can for face masks in which components such as rubber bands and nose pieces are used.
For instance, by practicing the methods of the present invention, waste of staples and elastic bands can be avoided during manufacture of face masks, for instance those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,131,442. One of the objectives is simply to recognize product during manufacture that ultimately would fail quality control inspection, and avoid placing material on to that product during the manufacturing processes.
As another example, the amount of adhesive applied to certain products can be reduced by not applying adhesive to products that have already been determined to be defected or assigned to rejection. For instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,320, adhesive application is shown for example in
In yet another exemplary application of the methods of the present invention, discrete components or raw material carried on products that have already been determined to be defected or assigned to rejection can also be removed and recycled prior to commingling with other discrete components or raw material. For instance, if an absorbent pad, such as shown at reference numeral 40 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,320 is destined for application to a product that has already been determined to be defected or assigned to rejection, the absorbent pad can be withdrawn from the product, or never introduced in the first instance. For example, during startup or shutdown of high speed diaper manufacturing operations, a certain number of products is routinely discarded into recycling. By identification of the start up or shut down routine, avoidance of introduction of absorbent pads can be achieved. Alternatively, during stand-by, the absorbent pads often degrade by accumulation of dust. By identifying which products would bear the dust, the absorbent pads can be withdrawn from further manufacture, and no additional components would be applied to such a product.
In one embodiment, a method for assembling a plurality of continuous webs is provided, including defining first web inspection parameters and inspecting at least one of the plurality of continuous webs to determine whether the at least one web conforms to the first web inspection parameters. Further, the method involves providing a chassis web which is adapted to receive a patch and providing a patch web from which the patch is cut. Finally, the cut patch is applied to the chassis web if the inspected web conforms to the first web inspection parameters. In another embodiment, the method also includes steps of defining first patch inspection parameters and inspecting a cut patch to determine whether the patch conforms to the first patch inspection parameters. While the patch inspection may provide interesting diagnostic information related to a web processing machine, the application of the patch may be limited to those patches that conform to the first patch inspection parameters.
Another embodiment of the method of the present invention involves defining first web inspection parameters and a product pitch. Generally in any web process, a web is provided, which is traveling at a web velocity. This embodiment involves inspecting the web to determine whether the web conforms to the first web inspection parameters and producing an inspection value as a result of the inspecting step. This value is then recorded once per sample time interval. The sample time interval may be calculated by dividing the defined product pitch by the web velocity. While the inspection value may be as simple as a bivalent value, a more informational multivalent value may be used.
In addition to the web process provided, an apparatus for carrying out the process is provided. An embodiment of the apparatus includes a continuous web supply providing continuous web material from an upstream position to a downstream position and a means for providing a patch spaced from a first side of the continuous web material. A patch applicator is provided to alter the space between the patch providing means and the continuous web material and a web inspection device is positioned upstream from the patch applicator. Additionally, a programmable controller receives an input from the web inspection device and provides an output to the patch applicator. The web processing apparatus may also include a patch inspection device that provides an output to the programmable controller. A patch reject conveyor may be positioned to receive defective patches from the patch providing means. In another embodiment of a web processing apparatus, a product inspection device may be located downstream from the patch applicator to provide an output to the programmable controller. Also, a product reject conveyor could be adapted to divert defective product as indicated by the product inspection device.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention which may be embodied in other specific structures. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
It is noted that the present waste minimization techniques and apparatus are described herein with respect to products such as diapers, but as previously mentioned, can be applied to a wide variety of processes in which discrete components are applied sequentially.
Referring to
The process continues through debulking, core cutting and spacing, optionally, compression, and application of tape and elastics. The process then proceeds with application of outer and inner non-woven layers, and waist elastic. The web can undergo folding, extraction and trimming of excess material, and application of material to tighten the diaper about the waist. Eventually, the product is folded and packaged.
As seen on
At each of these operations shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The process utilizes two main carrier webs; a nonwoven web 11 which forms an inner liner web, and a web 12 that forms an outwardly facing layer in the finished diaper 50. In this embodiment, the nonwoven web 11 is slit, at slitter station 15, by rotary knives 14 along three lines. One of these lines is preferably on approximately the centerline of web 11 and the other two lines are parallel to and spaced a short distance from the centerline. The effect is twofold; first, to separate web 11 into two inner liners 20. One liner will become the inside of the front of the diaper 50 and the second liner will become the inside of the back of that garment. Second, two separate, relatively narrow strips 22 and 24 are formed which are subsequently used to cover and entrap portions of leg-hole elastics 26. Strips 22 and 24 are separated physically by an angularly disposed spreader roll 23 and aligned laterally with their downstream target positions on the inner edges of the liner webs 20.
Adhesive patterns are applied to the liner webs 20 in target areas for the leg-hole elastics 26. A spray gun assembly 29 of a type known in the art is preferably used to apply the adhesive patterns. Two sets of leg-hole, elastic strands 26 are introduced through laydown guides 30, which reciprocate from side to side past each other. The strands 26 are glued to the web sections 20, their laydown patterns following a serpentine path. Given the absence of adhesive in the area separating the inner liners 20, for some portion of each successive diaper product, the strands 26 each track parallel to the inner slit edges of the web sections 20. Laydown guides 30 then apply the strands 26, which form leg-hole elastics as the web sections 20 are carried along the face of a drum or roll 32. Those parts of the elastic patterns which are near the inner slit edges of webs 20 are then covered by the introduction of an adhesive lamination thereover of the strips 22 and 24 of nonwoven web also against the drum 32.
The side-to-side excursions of the leg-hole elastic laydown guides 30 result in arcuate segments of elastic strands extending on each side of the web centerline. After the nonwoven strips 22 and 24 have been applied to cover and entrap those parts of the elastics 26 that run nearest to and parallel to the inner edges of the webs 20, a second pair of slitter knives 34 is used to trim away a portion of the narrow nonwoven strips 22, 24, along with that part of the inner liner webs 20 to which they are laminated. This also removes those portions of the elastic strands 26 which are contained within the laminations. The resultant trimmed scrap strips 36 are removed from the process for disposal elsewhere.
The effect of the last-described step is to remove the cut away portions of the elastic, eliminating its corresponding unwanted gathering effect from the crotch region of the garments 50. The remaining portions of the curved elastic strands create a gathering effect around the leg openings of the finished garments 50.
Subsequent to the combining and trimming of the inner webs 20 and the cover strips 22, 24, the combining drum 32 carries the webs to a nip with a second combining drum 38, where the web sections 20, with their respective curved elastic patterns exposed, are transferred to and laminated adhesively against the inside face of outer liner web 12. This process entraps the curved elastic patterns 26 between the inner liners 20 and outer web 12 thereby forming a composite web 39.
The composite web 39 is then provided with a pattern of adhesive in preparation to receive an absorbent insert or patch 46. The patch 46 is cut from a provided patch web 40 by a cooperation of a cutter 41 and an anvil surface on a vacuum roll 42 and rotated into position for transfer to the composite web 39 by a patch applicator 105. If the patch 46 is to be applied to the web 39—a determination explained more fully below—the patch applicator 105 forces the web 39 against the patch 46, thereby adhering the patch 46 to the web 39.
Leg-hole materials 48, if not previously removed, are cut at a cutting station 47, thereby removing the material 48 contained within an approximate perimeter defined by the curved pattern of the elastics 26. The running composite chassis web 39 is folded, before or after cutting out of the leg holes, longitudinally along its centerline, thereby generally aligning its front waist edge with its back waist edge. The regions 53 which are to become the side seams 54 of the garments 50 are then welded by a sealing device 49 either ultrasonically or by heat. Note that the leg holes are preferably cut out before this point, leaving only a narrow zone for welding. The weld pattern is preferably wide enough to extend into both the left side seam of one garment and the right side seam of the adjacent garment. The garments 50 are then separated by passing through a cut-off knife assembly 55, which severs the web along the transverse axis of the side seam weld 53.
In addition to the exemplary components generally found in a web processing apparatus, the present device and methods further include an advanced defect detection system. An embodiment of the defect detection system preferably comprises at least one visual inspection station 101, but preferably a plurality of visual inspection stations 101. Each visual inspection station 101 may include a vision sensor, such as an In-Sight Vision Sensor available from Cognex Corporation of Natick, Mass. Since each component part of a product resulting from a web process has a point of incorporation into the product, visual inspection of each component part preferably occurs prior to the point of incorporation. The results of the visual inspections that occur are relayed from each visual inspection station 101 to a programmable logic controller (PLC) 103. Each visual inspection station 101 may provide diagnostic capability by monitoring lighting, focus and positioning.
Machine vision systems typically require digital input/output devices and computer networks to control other manufacturing equipment, in this case the splicing unit.
A typical machine vision system will consist of several among the following components:
The sync sensor determines when a part (often moving on a conveyor) is in position to be inspected. The sensor triggers the camera to take a picture of the part as it passes by the camera and often synchronizes a lighting pulse. The lighting used to illuminate the part is designed to highlight features of interest and obscure or minimize the appearance of features that are not of interest (such as shadows or reflections).
The camera's image can be captured by the framegrabber. A framegrabber is a digitizing device (within a smart camera or as a separate computer card) that converts the output of the camera to digital format (typically a two dimensional array of numbers, corresponding to the luminous intensity level of the corresponding point in the field of view, called pixel) and places the image in computer memory so that it may be processed by the machine vision software.
The software will typically take several steps to process an image. In this case, the image processing will result in either detection of the indicator material, or non-detection of the indicator material.
Commercial and open source machine vision software packages typically include a number of different image processing techniques such as the following:
In most cases, a machine vision system will use a sequential combination of these processing techniques to perform a complete inspection. A system that reads a barcode may also check a surface for scratches or tampering and measure the length and width of a machined component.
Additionally, machine downtime can be minimized by the provision of systems and methods for warning a machine operator of expected machine troubles so that scheduled maintenance can occur.
The PLC 103 includes software adapted to run several routines that may be initiated by some triggering event, such as an automatic detection of a defined condition or manual input by a machine operator. Some routines are run during machine setup while other routines are run during machine operation, while still other routines are run during machine diagnostics at some point during machine downtime.
The PLC 103 generally receives inputs 120 from the visual inspection stations 101, from the various machine components, or from manual input by a machine operator on an operator interface, or human machine interface (HMI) 115. Some of the inputs can also be from stations near the pulp rolls, pulp mills, forming rollers, or elsewhere in the system where inspection is present.
The HMI 115 provides an interface for user interaction with the web processing machinery and may comprise a pressure sensitive touch screen, a keyboard, a computer mouse, or even a wireless device providing such an interface. The PLC 103 preferably provides controlling outputs 121 to the patch applicator 105, the cutter 41 and vacuum roll 42, a patch reject conveyor 107 and a product reject conveyor 109.
The input to the PLC 103 from each inspection station 101 preferably comprises a defect indicator 111 that represents a detected web defect at a position in the process a number of patch placements from the patch applicator 105. That is, at any given time during machine operation, between any inspection station 101 and any patch applicator 105 in a web process, there exists material sufficient to produce a determinable number of products having a patch applied thereto. Therefore, a defect may be detected and flagged as corresponding to a specific product location throughout the process.
In determining whether a patch should be applied to a product by a patch applicator 105, the PLC 103 stores a product status indicator for each product in the process, preferably for each product between the product reject conveyor 109 and most remote visual inspection station 101. The status indicator accumulates defect indicators 111 from the inspection stations 101 to track the progress of a product through the process.
A preferred product status indicator is a byte of digital data, with each bit reflecting the defect indicator 111 for the tagged product from an inspection station 101. For example, the least significant bit in the status indicator may represent the defect indicator for the most remote visual inspection station 101. As the bit significance increases, so does the proximity of the respective inspection station 101 to the product reject conveyor 109. A byte of data would provide for the possibility of eight inspection stations, and specific tracking of defects at those inspection stations. To store the product status indicator, the PLC 103 preferably includes some volatile and some nonvolatile computer memory. The volatile memory may provide quicker access times during machine operation, while the nonvolatile memory could be used to store product status indicators when the machine is paused. The minimum amount of memory required by the PLC 103 is at least partly determined by the number of visual inspection stations 101 and the number of potential products in queue between the first visual inspection station 101 and the product reject conveyor 109. For example, if a web process utilizes eight visual inspection stations 101 and two hundred products could be in queue in any given time, a volatile memory of at least two hundred bytes would be required.
The visual inspection station outputs may be sampled synchronously, or the outputs may be asynchronously analyzed by the PLC 103. If synchronous, the outputs may be sampled at a rate equal to the speed of the traveling webs divided by the product pitch, or product size. To enable use of different product sizes in a given process, the sample timing of the inspection station results may be varied, accordingly.
In addition to synchronous sampling of the inspection station results, the results could be analyzed asynchronously, which may be advantageous if various materials are incorporated into the process at different rates. Asynchronous analysis of the outputs, however, may provide less visibility into the specific defects included in a completed product.
Prior to operating or running a web process, the machinery must be threaded with raw patch web material. The PLC 103 may provide a software routine, such as an automatic web threading routine, for aiding such setup. An operator threads the patch web material 40 through the machine to the patch applicator 105. The operator then initiates the automatic threading routine by using the HMI 115. The HMI 115 is coupled to the PLC 103 and the PLC 103 controls the patch applicator 105, patch cutter 41, vacuum roll 42, and patch reject conveyor 107. A first number of patches 46 are cut by the patch cutter 41 and culled via the patch reject conveyor 107. The culled patches 46a may be a predetermined number from the start of the threading routine, or cut patches 46 could be inspected by a visual inspection station 101, and culled until the patches 46 meet visual inspection parameters 108, as seen in
Also, if the machine was shut down or paused with existing patch web material loaded through the patch cutter, but a vacuum remains drawn through the vacuum anvil drum, the patch web material on the vacuum anvil drum will act as an air filter. The longer the patch web material is on the drum, the dirtier it will get. Such soiled material may not be used in the construction of products for sale. Therefore, the PLC 103 could provide a software routine for clearing the vacuum anvil drum of soiled web material. Patches that have been on the anvil for a predetermined amount of time, and therefore may have dust built up, are culled through the reject prior to machine startup. Like the automatic threading routine, a predetermined number of patches may be culled, or the patches may be inspected for dust build-up.
In addition to threading and anvil clearing, a placement accuracy routine could be provided, for use on machine startup, or when the product configuration is changed. In a representative placement accuracy routine, patches are placed to several startup reject products, and relevant dimensions are taken by a visual inspection station 101 placed downstream from the patch applicator 105. The inspection results indicate if and when the patch placement meets specified patch placement parameters.
During machine operation, the PLC 103, through software algorithms, determines whether a patch 46 should be placed by the patch applicator 105, whether the patch 46 should be culled, or whether the web 39 should be allowed to continue to run without patch placement. A patch 46 is placed on the moving chassis web 39 only if both the patch 46 and web 39 are in condition for satisfactory placement.
After machine setup and threading of any materials, the PLC 103 begins verifying status indicators at the <application> position in memory. Generally, during machine operation, the PLC 103 controls whether a patch 46 is applied by a patch applicator 105. For each product, the PLC 103 determines the action of the patch applicator 105, the patch reject conveyor 107, and the product reject conveyor 109. For each product presented to a patch applicator 105, the PLC 103 issues one of the following commands to the patch applicator 105 and patch cutter: (1) apply patch; (2) cull patch; or (3) cull web.
The apply patch command is issued if no component part has been flagged as defective in the composite web 39 that is presented to the patch applicator 105 and the patch 46, itself, satisfies inspection parameters. When the apply patch command is issued, the vacuum anvil drum 42 remains relatively stationary while the composite web 39 having a deposited adhesive is forced by the patch applicator 105 against the patch 46. After the patch 46 is applied, the PLC awaits the arrival of the next patch attachment site or product pitch.
The cull patch command is issued if a patch 46a does not meet inspection parameters. Representative parameters can be seen in
The cull web command is issued if any component part of the composite web 39 is flagged as defective.
The PLC 103 may also contain a unit diagnostics program, which monitors parameters of the patch on the anvil to determine the health of the cutting knives and anvils. The unit diagnostics program involves the use of defined patch parameters measured by a vision inspection station and compared to expected values. Information that is gathered by the diagnostics program is stored and processed in a database. Where measured parameters are approaching acceptable limits, alerts are sent to the machine operator, indicating that potential problems are developing. The HMI may automatically present the Unit Diagnostics Screen for the operator to assess the situation. Furthermore, the HMI may provide graphics and charts to assist the operator by showing trend data, measured data, and comparable data. Thus, an operator is given advance notice of a problem so that any corrections can be made during the next machine downtime. Specifically, as the knives on the patch cutter age, the patches tend to skew. Furthermore, the deviation between subsequent patch cut lengths is another indicator that a knife blade may require replacement.
In an effort to prolong machine run-time between service and to reduce start-up rejects, an automatic anvil adjustment program may be provided. Such adjustment allows the anvil drum and knife roll to move relative to one another. Startup and shutdown rejects can result in rejections of many products. The movements are preferably in one millimeter increments over a five millimeter range. The adjustments are made as the machine is running to prevent wear on a single spot as well as to minimize buildup of cut web material on the anvil. In addition to the automatic adjustment, a manual override adjustment may be provided for troubleshooting.
If the unit diagnostics program detects a pair of patches that have parameters outside of acceptable limits, which is usually caused by a catastrophic failure of a knife or anvil, the machine operator is alerted and the HMI preferably automatically presents the Unit Diagnostics Screen for the operator to assess the situation. For every knife or anvil that fails, two patches will be affected. Therefore, if the anvil roller can accompany eight patches, twenty-five percent of the patches will fall out of acceptable limits. All patches that fall out of the acceptable limits are culled by way of the reject patch conveyor. All patches that fall within acceptable limits will continue to be placed on a composite web that is otherwise indicated as appropriate for receiving a patch. After being notified of the problem, the machine operator will observe the HMI to verify problem. In an attempt to correct the problem, the operator may try an electronic anvil shift, which, if successful, will allow the process to continue. If the electronic anvil shift does not correct the problem, the operator will request that the machine stop. To aid in repair or replacement of the failed knife or anvil, the cutter and anvil drum will stop in a position allowing easy access to the failed components. As a convenience and to enable more efficient repair of the failed components, a rapid change out (RCO) tool or kit could be provided, such as a set of hex wrenches. The operator changes the failed part and prepares the machine to restart. The routine for automatically clearing the anvil drum may then run, and the unit begins attaching patches to the composite web. The alarm that first alerted the operator of the problem is then reset, either automatically, or manually by the operator through the use of the HMI.
There may arise a situation where multiple anvils or knives appear to have failed. In this situation, the operator is alerted to the problem, but no patches are culled. Rather, a visual inspection station downstream from the patch applicator is examined to determine if there truly is a problem. If the problem is verified by the placement accuracy check, the operator shuts down the machine and proper maintenance is performed. If an examination of the placement accuracy inspection station does not confirm the purported problem, the unit diagnostics program may be suspended until it can be repaired.
Referring now to
Elastic laminates can be formed of a layer of stretched elastic between two non-stretched layers of non-woven material. Once the stretched elastic layer is bonded with the non-stretched non-woven, a stretch engine is formed once the elastic material is allowed to relax, forming a laminate that can be stretched in the machine direction.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
As can be seen, on a microscopic level, fibrous elements 322 of non-elastomeric layers 312a and 312b remain in bond sites 320. Further, at least a portion of the elastomeric layer 314 can remain commingled with fibrous elements 322 at the bond sites, in order to provide a smooth, yet structurally stable bond at the bond site 320.
Referring now to
The unwinding process preferably incorporates web accumulator device 322. A common use of a web accumulator 322 is where a web is fed from primary supply wheel 316s and it is necessary to splice the leading edge of the webs 312a or 312b from a standby supply wheel (not shown) to the trailing edge of the webs 32a and 12b from the primary supply wheel 316 in a manner that will not cause interruption of the web supply to a web consuming or utilizing device.
In one known type of accumulator, the swinging dancer arm type, there is a set of spaced apart rollers on a swingable dancer arm cooperating with another set of rollers on an arm that may be stationary or swingable. A web is looped back and forth between the sets of rollers on opposed arms in a serpentine fashion. When the swingable arm is swung away from the other arm a substantial length of web is accumulated. During normal running of the web the arms will be urged to their maximum practical separation from each other to accumulate the maximum length of web. If the infeed web is slowed or stopped for a short time the tension in the web urges the arms to the minimum separation position in order to make the accumulated web available to the machine. After infeed to the accumulator is resumed the arms separate again and return to their original position to accumulate and store another length of web.
In another known type of accumulator, the linear sliding carriage type, there is a set of rollers mounted on a movable carriage which can run linearly toward or away from a set of corresponding rollers which may either be stationary or similarly slidably mounted. During normal operation of the accumulator, the two sets of rollers will be slid to their maximum practical separation to accumulate the maximum amount of web. If the infeed supply to the web accumulator is slowed or stopped, the rollers will be slid toward each other to allow the stored web to be paid out. As the web infeed is returned to regular operational speed the movable rollers slide back toward the original position to accumulate another length of web. Metering stations 332 can be provided to analyze the speed of the infeed of the layers 312a and 312b, and to assist in determining how much material remains on infeed rolls.
Referring still to
A first ultrasonic bonding station 326a achieves breathability by joining the non-elastomeric layer 312b with the stretched elastomeric layer 14. Because the elastomeric layer 314 has been stretched, yet the non-elastomeric layer 312b has not been stretched, when the two layers are joined, the elastomeric layer 314 still will have stored the stretch.
Next, the second ultrasonic bonding station 326b bonds the pre-bonded combination of the non-elastomeric layer 312b and elastomeric layer 314 with the non-elastomeric layer 312a, achieving thee elastic lamination 310. Next, the elastomeric layer 314 is taken off of tension, which results in a gathering of the elastomeric layer 314 to create the ripple like appearance of the material as seen in
One advantage of two station bonding is that it offers flexibility for different anvil patterns at each station. For instance, a chicken feet pattern at the first station 326a, and a dot pattern anvil at the second station 326b, results in good breathability as well as good elastic retention forces at smaller bond sites. Additionally, because ultrasonic bonding station 326a is not required to penetrate three layers 312a, 314 and 312b, flexibility is offered with the degree of energy supplied.
Alternatively, the two non-woven layers 312a and 312b can be brought together with the elastomeric layer 314 sandwiched between, and the elastomeric layer 314 can be bonded to both non-woven layers 312a and 312b simultaneously (see
During construction of such laminates, defects in the elastic material 314 supplied to the process can result in snapped or otherwise unacceptable elastic introduced to the laminate. If such unacceptable elastic is introduced into the laminate, the manufacturing process can require slowing or stoppage in order for properly produced laminate to be re-introduced into the process and rethreaded in the manner shown in
Such automation results in less manual threading and re-threading, less system downtime, and and scrapped product resulting from unacceptable elastic forming unacceptable laminate being present in finished product.
Air knives (shown schematically on
An air knife, such as a commercially available EXAIR air knife, is a tool traditionally used to blow off liquid or debris from products as they travel on conveyors. The knife consists of a high intensity, uniform sheet of laminar airflow.
A pressurized air plenum containing a series of holes or continuous slots through which pressurized air exits in a laminar flow pattern characterizes an air knife. The exit air velocity then creates an impact air velocity onto the surface of whatever object the air is directed. This impact air velocity can range from a gentle breeze to greater than Mach 0.6 (40,000 ft/min) to alter the surface of a product without mechanical contact.
Traditional uses of air knives remove liquids, control the thickness of liquids, dry the liquid coatings, remove foreign particles, cool product surfaces or create a hold down force to assist in the mechanical bonding of materials to the surface. The present use of an air knife to transport a loose end of a web material, such as an elastic material is novel. Several air knives are used in succession to guide or thread the loose end of the web material through a series of rollers or in another targeted direction.
Referring now to
Referring still to
If the elastomeric layer 314 should be detected as being unacceptable, a threading/re-threading sequence is initiated. Unacceptable elastomeric 314 infeed conditions can be indicated for instance by the first camera positioned near the infeed of elastomeric layer 314; or missing elastomeric, as determined by the next camera positioned after the non-woven layers have been sandwiched about the elastomeric layer 314; or by a pressure sensor mounted before the first stretch wheel 338.
Depending on the location and nature of the free end of the incoming elastomeric 314, which can be determined by additional vision sensors deployed throughout the stretch wheel array, the elastomeric 314 might require retreatment from the stretch wheel array (for instance if the free end of the incoming elastomeric 314 is within the stretch wheel array). Alternatively, if the free end of the incoming elastomeric 314 is prior to the first stretch wheel 338, retreatment will not be necessary.
The threading/re-threading sequence involves nearly immediate movement of the first and third stretch wheels 338 and 342 (see
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Although the foregoing description involves the placement of an absorbent insert or patch onto a diaper chassis, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the apparatus and process could be used to avoid unnecessary waste in the application of any sort of patch to a moving web. Other examples of patches that may be placed are tape tab patches and reusable fasteners.
The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/400,318 filed 26 Jul. 2010. This application is also a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/880,261, filed on Jul. 20, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
35145 | Murphy | Jan 1873 | A |
2933353 | Purvis | Feb 1884 | A |
312257 | Cotton et al. | Feb 1885 | A |
410123 | Stilwell | Aug 1889 | A |
432742 | Stanley | Jul 1890 | A |
643821 | Howlett | Feb 1900 | A |
1393524 | Grupe | Oct 1921 | A |
1431315 | Le Moine | Oct 1922 | A |
1605842 | Jones | Nov 1926 | A |
1629681 | Cram | May 1927 | A |
1686595 | Belluche | Oct 1928 | A |
1957651 | Joa | May 1934 | A |
2009857 | Potdevin | Jul 1935 | A |
2054832 | Potdevin | Sep 1936 | A |
2117432 | Linscott | May 1938 | A |
2128746 | Joa | Aug 1938 | A |
2131808 | Joa | Oct 1938 | A |
2164408 | Joa | Jul 1939 | A |
2167179 | Joa | Jul 1939 | A |
2171741 | Cohn et al. | Sep 1939 | A |
2213431 | Joa | Sep 1940 | A |
2254290 | Joa | Sep 1941 | A |
2254291 | Joa | Sep 1941 | A |
2282477 | Joa | May 1942 | A |
2286096 | Joa | Jun 1942 | A |
2296931 | Joa | Sep 1942 | A |
2304571 | Joa | Dec 1942 | A |
2324930 | Joa | Jul 1943 | A |
2345937 | Joa | Apr 1944 | A |
2466240 | Joa | Apr 1949 | A |
2481929 | Joa | Sep 1949 | A |
2510229 | Joa | Jun 1950 | A |
2540844 | Strauss | Feb 1951 | A |
2584002 | Elser et al. | Jan 1952 | A |
2591359 | Joa | Apr 1952 | A |
2618816 | Joa | Nov 1952 | A |
2627859 | Hargrave | Feb 1953 | A |
2695025 | Andrews | Nov 1954 | A |
2702406 | Reed | Feb 1955 | A |
2721554 | Joa | Oct 1955 | A |
2730144 | Joa | Jan 1956 | A |
2772611 | Heywood | Dec 1956 | A |
2780253 | Joa | Feb 1957 | A |
2785609 | Billeb | Mar 1957 | A |
2788786 | Dexter | Apr 1957 | A |
2811905 | Kennedy, Jr. | Nov 1957 | A |
2828745 | Deutz | Apr 1958 | A |
2839059 | Joa | Jun 1958 | A |
2842169 | Joa | Jul 1958 | A |
2851934 | Heywood | Sep 1958 | A |
2875724 | Joa | Mar 1959 | A |
2890700 | Lonberg-Holm | Jun 1959 | A |
2913862 | Sabee | Nov 1959 | A |
2939461 | Joa | Jun 1960 | A |
2939646 | Stone | Jun 1960 | A |
2960143 | Joa | Nov 1960 | A |
2990081 | De Neui et al. | Jun 1961 | A |
2991739 | Joa | Jul 1961 | A |
3016207 | Comstock, III | Jan 1962 | A |
3016582 | Joa | Jan 1962 | A |
3017795 | Joa | Jan 1962 | A |
3020687 | Joa | Feb 1962 | A |
3021135 | Joa | Feb 1962 | A |
3024957 | Pinto | Mar 1962 | A |
3053427 | Wasserman | Sep 1962 | A |
3054516 | Joa | Sep 1962 | A |
3069982 | Heywood et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3086253 | Joa | Apr 1963 | A |
3087689 | Heim | Apr 1963 | A |
3089494 | Schwartz | May 1963 | A |
3091408 | Schoeneman | May 1963 | A |
3114994 | Joa | Dec 1963 | A |
3122293 | Joa | Feb 1964 | A |
3128206 | Dungler | Apr 1964 | A |
3203419 | Joa | Aug 1965 | A |
3230955 | Joa | Jan 1966 | A |
3268954 | Joa | Aug 1966 | A |
3288037 | Burnett | Nov 1966 | A |
3289254 | Joa | Dec 1966 | A |
3291131 | Joa | Dec 1966 | A |
3301114 | Joa | Jan 1967 | A |
3318608 | Smrekar | May 1967 | A |
3322589 | Joa | May 1967 | A |
3336847 | Johnson | Aug 1967 | A |
3342184 | Joa | Sep 1967 | A |
3356092 | Joa | Dec 1967 | A |
3360103 | Joa | Dec 1967 | A |
3391777 | Joa | Jul 1968 | A |
3454442 | Heller, Jr. | Jul 1969 | A |
3463413 | Smith | Aug 1969 | A |
3470848 | Dreher | Oct 1969 | A |
3484275 | Lewicki, Jr. | Dec 1969 | A |
3502322 | Cran | Mar 1970 | A |
3521639 | Joa | Jul 1970 | A |
3526563 | Schott, Jr. | Sep 1970 | A |
3538551 | Joa | Nov 1970 | A |
3540641 | Besnyo | Nov 1970 | A |
3575170 | Clark | Apr 1971 | A |
3607578 | Berg et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3635462 | Joa | Jan 1972 | A |
3656741 | Macke et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3666611 | Joa | May 1972 | A |
3673021 | Joa | Jun 1972 | A |
3685818 | Burger et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3728191 | Wierzba et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3751224 | Wackerle | Aug 1973 | A |
3758102 | Munn et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3772120 | Radzins | Nov 1973 | A |
3776798 | Milano | Dec 1973 | A |
3796360 | Alexeff | Mar 1974 | A |
3811987 | Wilkinson et al. | May 1974 | A |
3816210 | Aoko et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3847710 | Blomqvist et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3854917 | McKinney et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3883389 | Schott, Jr. | May 1975 | A |
3888400 | Wiig | Jun 1975 | A |
3901238 | Geller et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3903768 | Amberg et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3904147 | Taitel et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3918698 | Coast | Nov 1975 | A |
3960646 | Wiedamann | Jun 1976 | A |
3988194 | Babcock et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3991994 | Farish | Nov 1976 | A |
4002005 | Mueller et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4003298 | Schott, Jr. | Jan 1977 | A |
4009814 | Singh | Mar 1977 | A |
4009815 | Ericson et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4053150 | Lane | Oct 1977 | A |
4056919 | Hirsch | Nov 1977 | A |
4081301 | Buell | Mar 1978 | A |
4090516 | Schaar | May 1978 | A |
4094319 | Joa | Jun 1978 | A |
4103595 | Corse | Aug 1978 | A |
4106974 | Hirsch | Aug 1978 | A |
4108584 | Radzins et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4136535 | Audas | Jan 1979 | A |
4141193 | Joa | Feb 1979 | A |
4141509 | Radzins | Feb 1979 | A |
4142626 | Bradley | Mar 1979 | A |
4157934 | Ryan et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4165666 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4168776 | Hoeboer | Sep 1979 | A |
4171239 | Hirsch et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4205679 | Repke et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4208230 | Magarian | Jun 1980 | A |
4213356 | Armitage | Jul 1980 | A |
4215827 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4222533 | Pongracz | Sep 1980 | A |
4223822 | Clitheroe | Sep 1980 | A |
4231129 | Winch | Nov 1980 | A |
4236955 | Prittie | Dec 1980 | A |
4275510 | George | Jun 1981 | A |
4284454 | Joa | Aug 1981 | A |
4307800 | Joa | Dec 1981 | A |
4316756 | Wilson | Feb 1982 | A |
4325519 | McLean | Apr 1982 | A |
4342206 | Rommel | Aug 1982 | A |
4364787 | Radzins | Dec 1982 | A |
4374576 | Ryan | Feb 1983 | A |
4379008 | Gross et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4394898 | Campbell | Jul 1983 | A |
4411721 | Wishart | Oct 1983 | A |
4452597 | Achelpohl | Jun 1984 | A |
4492608 | Hirsch et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4501098 | Gregory | Feb 1985 | A |
4508528 | Hirsch et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4522853 | Szonn et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4543152 | Nozaka | Sep 1985 | A |
4551191 | Kock et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4586199 | Birring | May 1986 | A |
4589945 | Polit | May 1986 | A |
4603800 | Focke et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608115 | Schroth et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4610097 | Kotitschke et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4610681 | Strohbeen et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4610682 | Kopp | Sep 1986 | A |
4614076 | Rathemacher | Sep 1986 | A |
4619357 | Radzins et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4634482 | Lammers | Jan 1987 | A |
4641381 | Heran et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4642150 | Stemmler | Feb 1987 | A |
4642839 | Urban | Feb 1987 | A |
4650530 | Mahoney et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4663220 | Wisneski et al. | May 1987 | A |
4672705 | Bors et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4675016 | Meuli et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4675062 | Instance | Jun 1987 | A |
4675068 | Lundmark | Jun 1987 | A |
4686136 | Homonoff et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693056 | Raszewski | Sep 1987 | A |
4701239 | Craig | Oct 1987 | A |
4720415 | Vander Wielen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4723698 | Schoonderbeek | Feb 1988 | A |
4726874 | Van Vliet | Feb 1988 | A |
4726876 | Tomsovic, Jr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743241 | Igaue et al. | May 1988 | A |
4751997 | Hirsch | Jun 1988 | A |
4753429 | Irvine et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756141 | Hirsch et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763822 | Mohrsen | Aug 1988 | A |
4764325 | Angstadt | Aug 1988 | A |
4765780 | Angstadt | Aug 1988 | A |
4776920 | Ryan | Oct 1988 | A |
4777513 | Nelson | Oct 1988 | A |
4782647 | Williams et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4785986 | Daane et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4795451 | Buckley | Jan 1989 | A |
4795510 | Wittrock et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4798353 | Peugh | Jan 1989 | A |
4801345 | Dussaud et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802570 | Hirsch et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4840609 | Jones et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4845964 | Bors et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4864802 | D'Angelo | Sep 1989 | A |
4880102 | Indrebo | Nov 1989 | A |
4888231 | Angstadt | Dec 1989 | A |
4892536 | Des Marais et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4904440 | Angstadt | Feb 1990 | A |
4908175 | Angstadt | Mar 1990 | A |
4909019 | Delacretaz et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4915767 | Rajala et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917746 | Kons | Apr 1990 | A |
4925520 | Beaudoin et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927322 | Schweizer et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927486 | Fattal et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927582 | Bryson | May 1990 | A |
4937887 | Schreiner | Jul 1990 | A |
4963072 | Miley et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4987940 | Straub et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4994010 | Doderer-Winkler | Feb 1991 | A |
5000806 | Merkatoris et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5021111 | Swenson | Jun 1991 | A |
5025910 | Lasure et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5045039 | Bay | Sep 1991 | A |
5062597 | Martin et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5064179 | Martin | Nov 1991 | A |
5064492 | Friesch | Nov 1991 | A |
5080741 | Nomura et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5094658 | Smithe et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5096532 | Neuwirth et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108017 | Adamski, Jr. et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109767 | Nyfeler et al. | May 1992 | A |
5110403 | Ehlert | May 1992 | A |
5127981 | Straub et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131525 | Musschoot | Jul 1992 | A |
5131901 | Moll | Jul 1992 | A |
5133511 | Mack | Jul 1992 | A |
5147487 | Nomura et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5163594 | Meyer | Nov 1992 | A |
5171239 | Igaue et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176244 | Radzins et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5183252 | Wolber et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188627 | Igaue et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190234 | Ezekiel | Mar 1993 | A |
5195684 | Radzins | Mar 1993 | A |
5203043 | Riedel | Apr 1993 | A |
5213645 | Nomura et al. | May 1993 | A |
5222422 | Benner, Jr. et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223069 | Tokuno et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226992 | Morman | Jul 1993 | A |
5246433 | Hasse et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252228 | Stokes | Oct 1993 | A |
5267933 | Precoma | Dec 1993 | A |
5273228 | Yoshida | Dec 1993 | A |
5275676 | Rooyakkers et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5308345 | Herrin | May 1994 | A |
5328438 | Crowley | Jul 1994 | A |
5340424 | Matsushita | Aug 1994 | A |
5368893 | Sommer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5389173 | Merkatoris et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5393360 | Bridges et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5407507 | Ball | Apr 1995 | A |
5407513 | Hayden et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415649 | Watanabe et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421924 | Ziegelhoffer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424025 | Hanschen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429576 | Doderer-Winkler | Jul 1995 | A |
5435802 | Kober | Jul 1995 | A |
5443437 | Mack | Aug 1995 | A |
5449353 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5464401 | Hasse et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5486253 | Otruba | Jan 1996 | A |
5494622 | Heath et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500075 | Herrmann | Mar 1996 | A |
5516392 | Bridges et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518566 | Bridges et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525175 | Blenke et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531850 | Herrmann | Jul 1996 | A |
5540647 | Weiermann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545275 | Herrin et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545285 | Johnson | Aug 1996 | A |
5552013 | Ehlert et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556360 | Kober et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556504 | Rajala et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560793 | Ruscher et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575187 | Dieterlen | Nov 1996 | A |
5586964 | Chase | Dec 1996 | A |
5602747 | Rajala | Feb 1997 | A |
5603794 | Thomas | Feb 1997 | A |
5616113 | Van Den Bergh | Apr 1997 | A |
5624420 | Bridges et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624428 | Sauer | Apr 1997 | A |
5628738 | Suekane | May 1997 | A |
5634917 | Fujioka et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643165 | Klekamp | Jul 1997 | A |
5643396 | Rajala et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645543 | Nomura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659229 | Rajala | Aug 1997 | A |
5660657 | Rajala et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660665 | Jalonen | Aug 1997 | A |
5683376 | Kato et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683531 | Roessler et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
RE35687 | Igaue et al. | Dec 1997 | E |
5693165 | Schmitz | Dec 1997 | A |
5699653 | Hartman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705013 | Nease | Jan 1998 | A |
5707470 | Rajala et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711832 | Glaug et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5725518 | Coates | Mar 1998 | A |
5725714 | Fujioka | Mar 1998 | A |
5743994 | Roessler et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745922 | Rajala et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746869 | Hayden et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749989 | Linman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766389 | Brandon et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788797 | Herrin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817199 | Brennecke et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829164 | Kotitschke | Nov 1998 | A |
5836931 | Toyoda et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858012 | Yamaki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865393 | Kreft et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868727 | Barr et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876027 | Fukui et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5876792 | Caldwell | Mar 1999 | A |
5879500 | Herrin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902431 | Wilkinson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5932039 | Popp et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938193 | Bluemle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964390 | Boerresen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964970 | Woolwine et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6022443 | Rajala et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036805 | McNichols | Mar 2000 | A |
6043836 | Kerr et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050517 | Dobrescu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074110 | Verlinden et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076442 | Arterburn et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098249 | Toney et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123792 | Samida et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6171432 | Brisebois | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183576 | Couillard et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195850 | Melbye | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210386 | Inoue | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212859 | Bielik, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214147 | Mortellite et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6250048 | Linkiewicz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264784 | Menard et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276421 | Valenti et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276586 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276587 | Boerresen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284081 | Vogt et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287409 | Stephany | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306122 | Narawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309336 | Muessig et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312420 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314333 | Rajala et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315022 | Herrin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319347 | Rajala | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336921 | Kato et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358350 | Glaug et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369291 | Uchimoto et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375769 | Quereshi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391013 | Suzuki et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6416697 | Venturino et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431038 | Couturier | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440246 | Vogt et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443389 | Palone | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446795 | Allen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473669 | Rajala et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475325 | Parrish et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478786 | Glaug et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482278 | McCabe et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494244 | Parrish et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6514233 | Glaug | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521320 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523595 | Milner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524423 | Hilt et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533879 | Quereshi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540857 | Coenen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547909 | Butterworth | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551228 | Richards | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551430 | Glaug et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554815 | Umebayashi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569275 | Popp et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572520 | Blumle | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581517 | Becker et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585841 | Popp et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589149 | VanEperen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6596107 | Stopher | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596108 | McCabe | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605172 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605173 | Glaug et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6637583 | Anderson | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648122 | Hirsch et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6649010 | Parrish et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651923 | Kinnunen et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656309 | Parker et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6659150 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6659991 | Suekane | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675552 | Kunz et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684925 | Nagate et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722494 | Nakakado | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730189 | Franzmann | May 2004 | B1 |
6743324 | Hargett et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750466 | Guha et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758109 | Nakakado | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766817 | da Silva | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6808582 | Popp et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
D497991 | Otsubo et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
6814217 | Blumenthal et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820671 | Calvert | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837840 | Yonekawa et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840616 | Summers | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852186 | Matsuda et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6875202 | Kumasaka et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893528 | Middelstadt et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6913718 | Ducker | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918404 | Dias da Silva | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6942759 | Mohrsen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946059 | Mohrsen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6976521 | Mlinar | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978486 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7017820 | Brunner | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7045031 | Popp et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066586 | da Silva | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077393 | Ishida | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7130710 | Popp et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144356 | Harnish | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7172666 | Groves et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195684 | Satoh | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201345 | Werner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214174 | Allen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7214287 | Shiomi | May 2007 | B2 |
7247219 | O'Dowd | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7303708 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7380213 | Pokorny et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7398870 | McCabe | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7449084 | Nakakado | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7452436 | Andrews | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7533709 | Meyer | May 2009 | B2 |
7537215 | Beaudoin et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7587966 | Nakakado et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618513 | Meyer | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7638014 | Coose et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640962 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7703599 | Meyer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708849 | McCabe | May 2010 | B2 |
7770712 | McCabe | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771407 | Umebayashi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780052 | McCabe | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809179 | Singh et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811403 | Andrews | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861756 | Jenquin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871400 | Sablone et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7909956 | Coose et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7975584 | McCabe | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987964 | McCabe | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007484 | McCabe et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007623 | Andrews | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011493 | Giuliani et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8016972 | Andrews et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8257535 | Yamamoto | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20010012813 | Bluemle | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010017181 | Otruba et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020046802 | Tachibana et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059013 | Rajala et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020096241 | Instance | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020125105 | Nakakado | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020162776 | Hergeth | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030000620 | Herrin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030015209 | Gingras et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030051802 | Hargett et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052148 | Rajala et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066585 | McCabe | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083638 | Molee | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084984 | Glaug et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030089447 | Molee et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121614 | Tabor et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135189 | Umebayashi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040007328 | Popp et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040016500 | Tachibana et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044325 | Corneliusson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040087425 | Ng et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112517 | Groves et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040164482 | Edinger | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040182497 | Lowrey | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050000628 | Norrby | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022476 | Hamer | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050077418 | Werner et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050139713 | Weber et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050196538 | Sommer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230056 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230449 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233881 | Meyer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234412 | Andrews et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050257881 | Coose et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050275148 | Beaudoin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021300 | Tada et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060137298 | Oshita et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060224137 | McCabe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265867 | Schaap | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070045461 | Sartain et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074953 | McCabe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080223537 | Wiedmann | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090020211 | Andrews et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100078119 | Yamamoto | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100078120 | Otsubo | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100078127 | Yamamoto | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100193138 | Eckstein | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100193155 | Nakatani | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1007854 | Nov 1995 | BE |
1146129 | May 1983 | CA |
1153345 | Sep 1983 | CA |
1190078 | Jul 1985 | CA |
1210744 | Sep 1986 | CA |
1212132 | Sep 1986 | CA |
1236056 | May 1988 | CA |
1249102 | Jan 1989 | CA |
1292201 | Nov 1991 | CA |
1307244 | Sep 1992 | CA |
1308015 | Sep 1992 | CA |
1310342 | Nov 1992 | CA |
2023816 | Mar 1994 | CA |
2404154 | Oct 2001 | CA |
2541194 | Oct 2006 | CA |
2559517 | Apr 2007 | CA |
2337700 | Aug 2008 | CA |
2407867 | Jun 2010 | CA |
60123502 | Oct 2006 | DE |
60216550 | Dec 2006 | DE |
102005048868 | Apr 2007 | DE |
102006047280 | Apr 2007 | DE |
0044206 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0048011 | Mar 1982 | EP |
0089106 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0099732 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0206208 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0304140 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0439897 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0455231 | Nov 1991 | EP |
510251 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0652175 | May 1995 | EP |
0811473 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0901780 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0990588 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1132325 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1199057 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1272347 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1366734 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1504738 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1571249 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1619008 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1707168 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1726414 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1302424 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1801045 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1941853 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2233116 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2238955 | Oct 2010 | EP |
509706 | Nov 1982 | ES |
520559 | Dec 1983 | ES |
296211 | Dec 1987 | ES |
200601373 | Jul 2009 | ES |
2311349 | Sep 2009 | ES |
2177355 | Nov 1973 | FR |
2255961 | Jul 1975 | FR |
1132325 | Oct 2006 | FR |
2891811 | Apr 2007 | FR |
191101501 | Jan 1912 | GB |
439897 | Dec 1935 | GB |
856389 | Dec 1960 | GB |
941073 | Nov 1963 | GB |
1096373 | Dec 1967 | GB |
1126539 | Sep 1968 | GB |
1346329 | Feb 1974 | GB |
1412812 | Nov 1975 | GB |
2045298 | Oct 1980 | GB |
2115775 | Sep 1983 | GB |
2288316 | Oct 1995 | GB |
1374910 | May 2010 | IT |
1374911 | May 2010 | IT |
428364 | Jan 1992 | JP |
542180 | Feb 1993 | JP |
576566 | Mar 1993 | JP |
626160 | Feb 1994 | JP |
626161 | Feb 1994 | JP |
6197925 | Jul 1994 | JP |
9299398 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10035621 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-277091 | Oct 1998 | JP |
0602047 | May 2007 | SE |
0601003-7 | Jun 2007 | SE |
0601145-6 | Oct 2009 | SE |
WO2008155618 | Dec 1988 | WO |
WO9403301 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO9732552 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9747265 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9747810 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9821134 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9907319 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO9913813 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9932385 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9965437 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO0143682 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0172237 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO2004007329 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2005075163 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2007029115 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007039800 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007126347 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008001209 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2011 regarding EP Application No. 11250672.0, 4 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Jul. 23, 2009, 14 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Mar. 10, 2010, 11 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Nov. 9, 2010, 14 pages. |
USPTO Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/880,261, dated Jun. 23, 2011, 10 pages. |
“Reciprocating Mechanisms”, Franklin Jones, vol. 1, date unknown, 2 pp. |
European Search Report regarding Application No. EP11250709, dated Oct. 17, 2014, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120159753 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61400318 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11880261 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 13160932 | US |