1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to apparatus and methods for formation fluid collection and testing.
2. Description of the Related Art
During both drilling of a wellbore and after drilling, clean fluid from the formation is often extracted to determine the nature of the hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon-bearing formations. Fluid samples are often collected in sample chambers and the collected samples are tested to determine various properties of the extracted formation fluid. To drill a well, drilling fluid is circulated under pressure greater than the pressure of the formation in which the well is drilled. The drilling fluid invades into the formation surrounding the wellbore to varying depths, referred to as the invaded zone, which contaminates the original fluid present in the invaded zone. To collect samples of the original fluid present in the formation, a formation testing tool is conveyed into the wellbore. A pump typically extracts the fluid from the formation via a sealed probe placed against the inside wall of the wellbore. The initially extracted fluid is discarded into the wellbore while testing it for contamination. When the extracted fluid is sufficiently clean, samples are collected in chambers for further analysis. Single and concentric probes have been proposed for extracting formation fluid. In concentric probes, separate pumps are used to extract fluid from the formation via an outer probe and an inner probe. The outer probe extracts the fluid present around the inner probe, which aids in removing the contaminated fluid more efficiently and may prevent fluid from the wellbore to flow into the inner probe. When the contamination is at an acceptable level, the fluid from the inner probe is pumped into sample chambers (also referred to as “sampling”), while the fluid from the outer probe is discharged into the wellbore. During drawdown, the pump used for the outer probe creates pressure kick-backs in the inner probe, which reduces efficiency of the collection of the fluid samples. Also, since one pump is used for sampling the process of collecting samples can take long time.
The disclosure herein provides a formation evaluation system with a fluid extraction system that utilizes two or more probes that addresses some of the above-noted discrepancies.
In one aspect, a method of obtaining a fluid from a formation is disclosed that in one embodiment may include: pumping fluid received by a first probe and a second probe from the formation into the wellbore; determining when the fluid received by one of the first and second probes is clean; and pumping the fluid received by the first probe into a sample chamber while collecting the formation fluid received by the second probe from the formation into a storage device having an internal pressure less than the pressure of the formation.
In another aspect, an apparatus for obtaining a fluid from a formation is disclosed that in one embodiment may include: a first probe and a second probe; a first pump for extracting the fluid from the formation via the first probe and a second pump for extracting the fluid from the formation via the second probe; a first flow control device for directing the fluid extracted via the first probe into the wellbore and a sample chamber; a storage device for receiving the fluid extracted via the second probe due to pressure differential between the formation pressure and the pressure in the storage device; and a second flow control device for selectively directing the fluid extracted via the second probe into the wellbore and storage device.
Examples of certain features of the apparatus and methods disclosed herein are summarized rather broadly in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood. There are, of course, additional features of the apparatus and methods disclosed hereinafter that will form the subject of the claims.
For detailed understanding of the present disclosure, references should be made to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A pump 130 is coupled to the inner probe 110 via a fluid line 132 for withdrawing fluid 111a from formation 102. To draw fluid 111a from formation 102, the pump 130 is activated and the fluid withdrawn may be pumped into a chamber 136 via a flow control device 134. Alternatively, the withdrawn fluid may be discharged into the wellbore 101 via a fluid line 141. A pump 140 is coupled to the outer probe 150 via a fluid line 142 for withdrawing fluid 111b from formation 102. To draw fluid 111b from formation 102, the pump 140 is activated and in one aspect, the fluid withdrawn may be discharged into the wellbore via a conduit 144 and in another aspect collected in a clean-up unit 182 via a flow control device 143b. The clean-up device and/or sample chamber 136 may be disposed uphole or downhole of the probes 110 and 150.
The tool 120 further includes a controller 170 that contains circuits 172 for use in operating various components of the tool 120, a processor 174, such as a microprocessor, a storage device 176, such as a solid state memory, and programs 178 accessible to the processor 174 for executing instruction contained therein. The system 100 also includes a controller 190 at the surface that contains circuits 192, a processor 194, storage device 196 and programs 198.
To obtain clean formation fluid samples, the tool 120 is conveyed and placed at a selected depth in the wellbore 101. Pads 160a and 160b are activated to contact the wellbore wall 101a. The inner probe 110 and outer probe 150 are activated to urge against the wellbore wall 101a to seal the probes 110 and 150 against the wellbore wall 101a. In one aspect, both the inner and outer probes 110 and 150 are activated simultaneously or substantially simultaneously. Pumps 130 and 140 are activated to draw the formation fluid into their respective probes. Activating pump 140 causes the fluid 111b around the probe 110 to flow into the outer probe 150, while activating pump 130 causes the fluid 111a to flow into the inner probe 110. The initial fluid (111a and 111b) is the fluid present in the invaded zone and is thus contaminated. A fluid evaluation or testing device 185 may be used to determine when the fluid being withdrawn is sufficiently clean so that fluid samples may be collected. Any device, including, but not limited to, optical devices, may be utilized for determining contamination in the withdrawn fluid. As long as the fluid being withdrawn is contaminated above a threshold or otherwise not satisfactory, it may be discharged into the wellbore 101 via fluid lines 141 and 144. Once the fluid is clean, the valve 134 is operated to allow the fluid 111a from the inner probe 110 to enter the sample chamber 136. Such a mechanism allows for faster clean-up and prevents fluid from the wellbore to flow into the inner probe 110. In one aspect, when fluid 111a is being collected or prior thereto, pump 140 is deactivated and fluid 111b from the outer probe 150 is collected in the clean-up unit 180 due to pressure differential between the formation pressure and pressure in the clean-up unit 141. The pumps and flow control devices in the tool 120 may be controlled by the controller 170 according to instructions stored in programs 178 and/or instructions provided by the surface controller 190. Alternatively, controller 190 may control the operation of one or more devices in the tool 120 according to instructions provided by programs 198. The components of the formation evaluation tool 105 and methods for collecting clean formation fluid are described in more detail in reference to
Pump 240 extracts the formation fluid 211b from the formation 260 into fluid line 242. Pump 240 is shown to draw fluid 211b from line 242 via line connections 242a, 242c and 242b into line 244. The fluid in line 244 extracted via probe 250 may be selectively discharged into the wellbore 201 or into a sample clean-up unit or device 280. In one embodiment, a flow control device 262 controls the discharge of the fluid in line into the wellbore 201 and a flow control device 264 in line 265 connected to line 244 controls the discharge the fluid in line 244 to the sample clean-up unit 280. When the flow control device 262 is open and the flow control device 264 is closed, the fluid from line 244 discharges into the wellbore 201. When the flow control device 262 is closed and the flow control device 264 is open, the fluid from line 244 discharges into the sample clean-up unit 280 via line 268. A flow control device 270 between lines 242 and 244 allows the fluid in line 242 to pass into line 244. Thus, in the particular configuration of
Still referring to
The fluid present in the formation proximate to the wellbore is typically contaminated with the drilling fluid. The initial fluid extracted from the inner and outer probes 210 and 250 is thus contaminated fluid. Before clean fluid enters probes 210 and 250, the contaminated fluid entering the probes 210 and 250 is discarded into the wellbore 201. To discharge such fluid into the wellbore 201, flow control devices 220, 226, 256 and 262 are opened, while flow control devices 216, 222, 264, 266 and 270 are closed and pumps 230 and 240 are activated. Pump 230 extracts the formation fluid 211a from the inner probe 210 and such fluid is discharged into the wellbore 201 via flow control device 226, lines 232, 232a, 232b, 232c, 214 and flow control device 220. The fluid flow path for discharging the fluid 211a into the wellbore 201 is shown by arrows 215. Pump 240 extracts formation fluid 211b from formation 260, which is discharged into the wellbore 201 via fluid lines 242, 242a, 242b, 242c, 244 and flow control device 262. The fluid flow path of fluid 211b being discharged into the wellbore 201 is shown by arrows 225. The flow analysis device 285 provides measurements relating to the contamination level or contaminations in the fluid being extracted from the inner probe 210. A fluid analysis device 275 may be provided for determining characteristics of the fluid 211b flowing from the outer probe 250. The controllers 170 and/or 190 process the information from devices 275 and 285 and determine the contamination level. When the contamination level reaches an acceptable level or meets a threshold, the process of collecting clean sample is initiated as described in reference to
Although, the above embodiments show two probes in a wireline tool, the clean-up unit 280 may equally be utilized with a tool having a single or multiple probes and in wireline tools and in tools utilized during drilling of wellbores, such as drilling assemblies or bottomhole assemblies. Additionally, one or more sample chambers and clean-up units may be utilized for the purpose of this disclosure.
While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2747401 | Henri-Georges | May 1956 | A |
3352361 | Urbanosky | Nov 1967 | A |
3611799 | Davis | Oct 1971 | A |
4742459 | Lasseter | May 1988 | A |
6092416 | Halford et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6212948 | Ekdahl et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6301959 | Hrametz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6435279 | Howe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467544 | Brown | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499344 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6659177 | Bolze | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7243536 | Bolze | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7458252 | Freemark et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7857049 | Sherwood | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7886825 | Van Hal et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8899323 | Zazovsky | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9068436 | Theron | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9284838 | Cernosek | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9322267 | Pop | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20040020649 | Fields | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040221983 | Ma et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050115716 | Ciglenec et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050150287 | Carnegie | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060042793 | Del Campo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101905 | Bittleston et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080041593 | Brown | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080073078 | Sherwood | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090101339 | Zazovsky et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100223990 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110185809 | Guieze et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120132419 | Zazovsky et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130081803 | Tao | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130213645 | Proett et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140166269 | Pop | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2014/010871; International Filing Date: Jan. 9, 2014; Date of Mailing: Apr. 25, 2014; pp. 1-12. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140196532 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |